Charlotte City Council
Housing and Neighborhood Development Committee
Summary Meeting Minutes
January 17, 2007
COMMITTEE AGENDA TOPICS
I.
II.
Johnston and Mecklenburg Mills RFP Follow Up
Housing and Neighborhood Development Focus Area Plan
COMMITTEE INFORMATION
Council Members Present:
Michael D. Barnes, Susan Burgess, Anthony Foxx, Don Lochman and
Pat Mumford
Council Members Absent:
None
Staff Resource:
Julie Burch, Assistant City Manager
Staff:
Stanley Watkins, Neighborhood Development
Stan Wilson, Neighborhood Development
Zelleka Bierman, Neighborhood Development
Kim Eagle, Budget and Evaluation
Randy Harrington, Budget and Evaluation
Debra Campbell, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department
Others: Chad Maupin, Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Association
Hollis Nixon, President, Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Association
Meeting Duration: 12:10 p.m. – 1:25 p.m.
1.
2.
ATTACHMENTS
Agenda Packet – January 17, 2007
Follow Up Items
Housing and Neighborhood Development Committee
Meeting Summary for January 17, 2007
Page 2
DISCUSSION HIGHLIGHTS
I. Johnston and Mecklenburg Mills RFP Follow Up
Chad Maupin and Hollis Nixon of the Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Association (HNCNA)
provided a brief presentation on the Johnston and Mecklenburg Mills RFP in the North Davidson
(NoDa) area and the importance of Artspace to NoDa and the Charlotte community. The Committee
was reminded that both of the Mill buildings are designated historic landmarks. They explained that
the NoDa neighborhood proposes that Mecklenburg Mill be removed from the RFP for separate
negotiation between Artspace and the City, while Johnston Mill and the associated out buildings and
vacant land move forward under the current RFP . It was noted that the neighborhood association
supports the replacement of affordable housing as spelled out in the RFP. They stated that
Artspace, given its business model, will not consider a project in Charlotte without support from the
City and, as a policy, does not respond to RFP’s. It was further explained that, should Artspace be
included as part of the RFP, there would be no guarantee that developers will include them.
Concern was expressed that a delay in the City’s commitment to Artspace would clear the way for
other potential suitors, such as neighboring cities Concord and Gastonia. Artspace has a history of
spurring economic development, which would be a boon to the area, as businesses in NoDa are
struggling to survive. They added that the success of businesses in this area is incumbent upon NoDa
retaining and building its identity as the Arts District. In addition, it would help Charlotte retain and
attract an educated and active “cultural class”.
Committee member Lochman expressed concern about prioritizing one profession over others for tax
dollar subsidized affordable housing, adding that qualification for affordable housing and government
subsidies is an economic issue, not a “class” issue. He questioned whether artists are more desired as
neighbors than any other poor population, given the need for affordable housing. Mr. Lochman stated
that, in his opinion, Council has a responsibility to the average tax paying citizens and should look at
the economics of the situation to determine priorities for disposing of the property.
Committee member Mumford questioned whether the current RFP is worded to allow flexibility based
on the current condition of the property. He expressed his uncertainty about the attractiveness of
the site to developers in its current condition, adding that it is not in the City’s best interest to
retain ownership of either building any longer, as they are currently non-performing assets. Mr.
Mumford stated that the Committee must determine whether the driving force is economic return on
the investment, or replacement of affordable housing, either on a one-to-one basis or accommodated
elsewhere.
Committee member Foxx reiterated Mr. Mumford’s comments, adding that if the economics of the
deal end up better without Mecklenburg Mills in the bid, it makes sense to offer options on the
property or exclude it from the RFP. Mr. Foxx asked if there would be any barriers to entry for
artists if affordable housing were developed on the site?
Housing and Neighborhood Development Committee
Meeting Summary for January 17, 2007
Page 3
Stanley Watkins responded that artists, similar to anyone else within the affordable income range,
could make application to the management of the site to secure a space. Mr. Watkins noted that the
current RFP offers up the entire site, but the language could be modified to allow a bid on all or a
portion of the site. He added that staff is looking for clear direction from the Committee as to what
should be included in the RFP and the criteria to be used in the selection process.
Mr. Lochman questioned the time frame of the RFP process and stated that the City should offer
both buildings and accompanying vacant land in the initial RFP and reserve the option of bidding on a
portion of the site as a fallback. Council member Barnes confirmed this sentiment and expressed
concern that the RFP process has been delayed to cater to one constituency, while there are others,
such as the Charlotte Housing Partnership that are waiting to express interest through the RFP
process. Mr Barnes inquired as to how long the RFP process will take. Stanley Watkins answered that
the RFP process typically averages six months.
Ms. Burgess stated that Artspace typically is invited in by cities to solve a problem and does not have
a practice of responding to RFP’s. She added that an Artspace representative came to the January 2,
2007 City Council meeting to describe the program, not to ask for Mecklenburg Mills. Referencing
the aforementioned presentation, Mr. Lochman noted that the Artspace representative stated that
$500,000 is the approximate amount needed to bring an Artspace project to construction, when
asked if Artspace would have positive cash flow without initial government capital. Committee
member Burgess stated that the Artspace representative later clarified that the City’s only
contribution would be to sell the Mecklenburg Mill for $1.00. Mr. Foxx commented that moving
forward with both buildings in the RFP would not preclude Artspace from partnering with another
organization or developer to make a proposal.
Ms. Burgess stated that the RFP should be specific as to the portion(s) being offered up for bid and
expressed a need to include in the RFP a stipulation that the proposal must complement the unique
character of the neighborhood, with a note that the provision of studios and/or gallery space for
artists would be a factor for consideration in the selection process. She also stated that the RFP
should include information on the Committee’s desire to have any off-site affordable housing in close
proximity to the existing Mills. Mr. Lochman commented that the provision of artists studios will not
go toward furthering affordable housing and any references to character of the neighborhood are
implicit and subjective and do not belong in an RFP, which should be clear and concise. He added that
the character of the neighborhood will be retained because the exterior of the historic buildings
cannot be substantially changed. Ms. Burgess expressed concern about the character of additional
buildings that may be built on the site and added that design standards would require compatibility
with the Mill buildings. Julie Burch pointed out that page 13 of the current RFP references project
design and requires an architectural and site design study to be provided for new and existing
buildings.
Mr. Barnes asked whether the City has received an estimate on the cost to repair the termite
damage? Stanley Watkins responded that staff is awaiting an appraisal. Stan Wilson added that a
report has been done on the condition of the building, which is included as an attachment to the RFP,
but the properties have not been assessed for the cost of renovation because individual developers
Housing and Neighborhood Development Committee
Meeting Summary for January 17, 2007
Page 4
will likely want to conduct their own analyses. Mr. Lochman commented that, at some point, the City
will need a specific assessment of the damage, in order to evaluate the accuracy of damage estimates
that are submitted with proposals.
Mr. Foxx expressed concern about conveying the property to another party via the RFP process to
later find that the extent of the damage is too extensive for the purchaser to afford, which could
result in requests for additional funds from the City. Julie Burch stated that the RFP should clearly
specify that the buildings are to be purchased “as is”. She added that the condition of the buildings
may be worsening with the passage of time and potential developers need to enter into the process
fully aware of the extent of renovations that may be required to upfit the buildings. Stanley Watkins
stated that typically through the RFP process, financial data (and in some instances deposits) is
requested from proposed purchasers for use in the selection process to ascertain their capability to
follow through on the proposal. Stan Wilson added that staff is working with the City Attorney’s
office to include language in the RFP that will best protect the City.
Upon a motion made by Mr. Lochman and seconded by Mr. Barnes the Committee voted 3-1 to
approve the RFP as submitted by staff. (Mr. Mumford was not present for the vote).
Vote:
Yeas: Barnes, Foxx, Lochman
Nays: Burgess
Absent: None
The RFP is scheduled to go to full Council on February 12, 2007.
II. Housing and Neighborhood Development Focus Area Plan
Julie Burch explained that the draft Focus Area Plan has been updated and is being submitted to the
Committee for preview and preliminary feedback. Ms. Burch reviewed focus area initiative #5, which
is a new initiative to educate and engage residents in maintaining model neighborhood standards. She
explained that the measure for this initiative is the percent of neighborhood organizations that
implement successful problem solving initiatives, adding that this initiative will reflect the work of
the Neighborhood Development Department and its interaction with neighborhoods,.
Committee member Barnes expressed concern that the reference to model neighborhood standards
may be too subjective and questioned how, in light of prohibitive federal laws, the City will accomplish
strengthening areas of the City and holding people accountable for their actions.
Stanley Watkins responded that Neighborhood Development has not done a good job of imparting to
Council all of the initiatives that the department is involved in with neighborhoods, both in and
outside of the revitalization areas, and the outcomes as a result of the involvement. Mr. Watkins
added that all of the initiatives involve strengthening neighborhood organizations and equipping them
to begin to solve problems on their own. He noted that changes have been proposed to ordinances,
such as housing occupancy standards and boarded up structures and stressed the need for the
resources necessary to properly enforce the ordinances.
Housing and Neighborhood Development Committee
Meeting Summary for January 17, 2007
Page 5
Julie Burch also pointed out that, as a result of last years City Council retreat and by subsequent
Council adoption, there is a separate Housing and Neighborhood Development Priority Action Plan that
provides a more specific look at the initiatives. Ms. Burch added that the focus area plan will be
before the City Council at this years retreat.
Mr. Barnes asked if issues associated with Section 8 are included in the plan and whether the City
will be partnering with the Charlotte Housing Authority (CHA), in an effort to address challenges
presented by Section 8?
Committee member Burgess stated that the CHA Director, Charles Woodyard,is seeking permission
to try innovative measures in Charlotte pertaining to Section 8, which may result in flexibility to
address issues associated with Section 8 that are specific to Charlotte.
Committee member Foxx noted that the targets for expanding affordable housing have decreased, as
noted in initiative #2 and asked whether the resulting numbers are net of affordable housing
decreases? Stanley Watkins responded that the numbers reflect the projection of the number of
units that the City will be able to produce with the given funds.
The meeting was adjourned at 1:25 p.m.
City Council
Housing and Neighborhood Development Committee Meeting
Wednesday, January 17, 2007 – Noon
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center – Rooms 270/271
Committee Members:
Susan Burgess, Chair
Anthony Foxx, Vice-Chair
Michael Barnes
Don Lochman
Pat Mumford
Staff Resource:
Julie Burch
_______________
AGENDA
I.
Johnston and Mecklenburg Mills RFP Follow Up
(Attachment - A)
II.
Housing and Neighborhood Development Focus Area Plan
(Attachment - B)
Note: Attached is December 11, 2006 Follow Up Report (Attachment C)
_______________
Distribution:
Mayor/Council
Pam Syfert, City Manager
City Leadership Team
Corporate Communications
Debra Campbell – Planning Department
Anna Schleunes- City Attorney’s Office
Saskia Thompson- Manager’s Office
CDC Executive Directors
Housing Trust Fund Advisory Board
Neighborhood Representatives
Budget Office
Ruffin Hall
Phyllis Heath
Lisa Schumacher
Charlotte Housing Authority
Charles Woodyard
Troy White
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Housing Partnership
Pat Garrett
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department
Chief Darrel Stephens
Gerald Sennett
Neighborhood Development
Stanley Watkins
Richard Woodcock
Stan Wilson
Stephanie Small
Walter Abernethy
Pat Mason
Interested Parties
Roy Close, Artspace
Hollis Nixon, NoDa
Attachment A
Johnston and Mecklenburg Mills RFP Priorities
Housing and Neighborhood Development Committee
January 17, 2007
Committee Request:
Provide guidance to City staff on priorities for revising the Mills Request for Proposal (RFP).
Policy Framework:
City’s Mixed Housing Development Policy adopted by City Council on September 24,
2003.
• Charlotte Region Transit Station Area Joint Development Principles and Policy
Guidelines: The Joint Development Policies, adopted by the Charlotte City Council in
April 2003.
• The City’s FY2006-2010 Consolidated Plan was approved by City Council on June 13,
2005. The Plan identified the need for affordable, safe and decent housing for low and
moderate-income families. The Plan reaffirmed the three basic goals of the City’s
Housing Policy - Preserve the existing housing stock, Expand the supply of affordable
housing, and Support family self-sufficiency initiatives.
•
Project Description:
ƒ On January 2, 2007, the City Council discussed priorities for disposition of the
Johnston and Mecklenburg Mills at the request of the Housing and Neighborhood
Development Committee.
ƒ The presentation to the Council considered the following factors, not necessarily in
priority order:
o
o
o
o
ƒ
Return of the City's investment - Maximize the return of the City’s
investment ($6.7 million). The Mills’ value is estimated between $4.2 and $4.8
million. Private and non-profit developers have expressed interest in the
property. [Note: A new appraisal has been ordered and should be available in
three to five weeks.]
Replacement of affordable housing – Previously, there were 150 affordable
housing units on the site. Consideration should be given to replacing those units
either on-site or off-site. Also, a priority for residency should be given to the
former Mecklenburg Mills residents.
Promote transit oriented development - Proximity of the site to a future
transit station (36th Street) supports mixed use development at the site.
Space for Artist – The City could donate a building for artist housing or
encourage artist housing as part of an RFP process. Artspace, a non-profit
housing developer presented an overview of their organization and gave
examples of how it could assist the City in creating low-income housing for
artists.
City Council members discussed the pros and cons of the various factors. The
importance of the City recovering as much of its investment as possible was
considered by some members as the most important factor. Replacement of
1
Attachment A
ƒ
affordable housing was considered by members as important as well. Some Council
members saw the property as an opportunity to create a unique development (mixed
use of housing, office & retail) which could be an asset to the neighborhood and
future light rail plans. Opinions were spilt on whether considerations should be given
to artists on the site. It was suggested that the RFP include opportunities for all the
above mentioned factors. Finally, the Council acknowledged the competing priorities
that the Council committee faces and indicated it would await the Committee’s
recommendation.
Typically, RFPs give guidance to would-be proposals on the important factors that will
be evaluated in making a decision. City staff is seeking guidance on the most
important factors.
Attachments:
Background on the Johnston and Mecklenburg Mills Property
Summary of the Request for Proposal (Updated as of 11/14/06)
2
Attachment A
Background on Johnston and Mecklenburg Mills Property
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Mecklenburg Mill Apartments is a 60-unit complex located at 3327 North Davidson
Street and Johnston Mill Apartments is a 90-unit complex located at 3315 North
Davidson Street.
August 6, 1990 – The City approved a $1,000,000 loan to Trenton Property, Inc. for the
acquisition and rehabilitation of Johnston and Mecklenburg Mills.
June 24, 1991 - The City provided an additional loan of $2,533,500 to develop Johnston
Mill and renegotiated the $600,000 balance of the original loan.
The City invested $2.4 million for the rehabilitation of the Mecklenburg Mill
Apartments.
September 27, 2004 - City Council approved an additional $800,000 to acquire the first
mortgage for Johnston Mill Apartments to protect the City’s interest and maintain the
units as affordable.
In January 2006, the City foreclosed and took possession of both the Mecklenburg and
Johnston Mill apartments.
On May 12, 2006, the residents in Mecklenburg Mill were evacuated for their safety.
At the January 17, 2007 Housing and Neighborhood Committee meeting, staff will
provide an update on the current conditions of the Mills properties and a progress
report on obtaining an appraisal.
3
Attachment A
Summary of the Mills Request For Proposal (RFP)
(Updated as of 11/14/06)
•
•
City staff has prepared a Request for Proposals based on the recommendations of a
Proposal Review Committee.
Committee representation was as follows:
- Kevin Sutton, North Davidson Neighborhood Association
- Chad Maupin, North Davidson Neighborhood Association
- Paul McBroom, North Davidson Business Association
- Paul Sires, North Davidson Business Association
- Fred Dodson, Charlotte Mecklenburg Housing Partnership
- Diane English, Belmont Neighborhood Representative
- Angela Coleman, Villa Heights Neighborhood Representative
- City Staff representatives from Economic Development, Planning, CATS, Real Estate
and Neighborhood Development
•
RFP Scope: The City is seeking proposals from qualified developers or development
teams to purchase, design, rehabilitate, market and manage the Mill properties. The
City seeks mixed-income development.
o Proposals can be for rental and/or ownership housing units.
o Proposals offering “off-site” rental housing will also be considered.
•
Developer Expectations:
o Secure the financing for the acquisition and rehabilitation of the apartments.
o Secure all approvals, (zoning, subdivision, etc.) permits and pay fees necessary
for the development and construction on the site.
o Provide liability, builder’s risk and workman’s compensation insurance in amounts
acceptable to the City of Charlotte.
o Develop a “turnkey housing project” in accordance with plans approved by the
City.
o Adhere to the agreed upon time schedule for construction. Construction shall be
initiated within six (6) months of the real estate closing.
o Secure and maintain proof of appropriate licenses as required by local and state
laws.
o Develop and execute a sales and marketing plan for the project (homeownership)
o Provide on-site management or equivalent for entire existence of the
apartments.
o Provide a project development pro forma and financial qualifications of the
development team.
•
City Financial Contributions
o The City financial contribution to any proposed development is limited to the
value inherent in the buildings and the land.
•
Former Mecklenburg Mill Residents:
o Former Mecklenburg Mill residents who meet the leasing and/or ownership
4
Attachment A
requirements will be given priority for any housing development.
•
1:1 Replacement
o The City seeks a 1:1 replacement of 150 affordable units, either on-site or offsite.
•
Affordability Targets (minimum affordability targets)
o The City’s goal is to maximize the number of affordable units. The City’s priority
is housing units that serve households earning 30 percent or less than the area
median income.
Percent of
Affordable Units
Percent of
Area Median Income
Development
Type
At Least 20% of the Units
<60%
Rental
At Least 20% of the Units
Up to 80%
Ownership
(Note: The Median income for a 4-person family in Charlotte is currently
$64,400. This figure is adjusted annually by the City and changed depending on
the size of household.)
•
Architectural Design Guidelines
o RFP document includes design guidelines to create livable housing units that are
attractive, easy to maintain and enhance the architectural character of the
NODA neighborhood. Guidelines address; transit, unit design, plans, construction
and historic tax credits.
o The site is in proximity of a proposed future transit station site, which has not
been approved. As part of the Northeast Light Rail Project Draft Environmental
Impact Study (DEIS), a Station Area Concept was developed for the 36th Street
station. The Station Area concept calls for small-scale (two to three stories)
infill development to strengthen the character of established neighborhoods.
o The Planning Department recommends a focus on compatibility with the historic
character and limited land availability. Proposed development should not exceed
four stories. The property may need to be rezoned to accommodate the
development future. Consideration should be given to the opportunity for
redeveloping surrounding industrial land uses to neighborhood-oriented mixed use
developments that can help reinforce Historic North Davidson’s vitality.
•
Historic Landmarks Commission Review
o All proposals must be reviewed by the Historic Landmarks Commission.
•
Engineering Reports
o The City will provide the most recent available engineering reports on the site.
5
Attachment A
•
RFP Submission Requirements
o Developers or Development teams must submit the following information as its
proposal submission to the City of Charlotte.
Submission Information
Description
General Developer
Information
Information to include; experience and qualifications
of all team members, type of organization, recent
financial information, previous developments (similar
in nature), references, certificate of good standing.
Proposed Project Information
Information to include; general description of the
proposed project, number and type of units, income
levels served (particularly 30% and below), proposed
economic development, market study, graphic
illustrations, (site plan, floor plans and conceptual
design), and proposed project schedule.
Project Financing
Information to include; project pro forma, cash flow
projections, offered price for the property, sources
and uses of funds, scope of work (projected
construction costs and specifications).
Project Design
•
Information to include; integration of light rail
station with the Mill site, architectural site design,
streetscape design, parking, public spaces and
amenities, pedestrian paths.
Selection Criteria
The City will select the developer/development team that most successfully meets
the criteria listed below:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Proven ability of the development team to successfully develop and manage
higher-density residential projects. Proven ability shall mean successfully
completed and managed at least three multi-family developments.
Ability to secure construction and permanent financing for the project.
Commitment and ability to bring developer equity to the project.
Degree of responsiveness to the development program, specifically affordable
housing replacement and the affordability targets (priority units serving 30
percent or less than the area median income), design requirements and other
goals and objectives in the request for proposals.
Quality of the design proposed and ability of the development team to
implement a high quality project.
A purchase price that provides the City of Charlotte acceptable compensation
for City’s land while achieving the other goals of this project.
A Management plan for the project that maintains the affordability goals of
this project.
6
Attachment A
8.
Proven ability and experience in managing mixed income higher-density
residential properties.
9. Connectivity between site and light rail station.
10. Maximum Density.
Projected RFP Schedule: The preliminary schedule for this project is as follows:
•
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
•
Issue Request for Proposals
Pre-Submission Conference
Proposal Due Date
Selection Committee Reviews and Short List
Proposal Presentations
Selection Committee Recommendation
City Council Approval of the Development Team
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
The Historic North Charlotte Neighborhood Association and the North Davidson
Business Association request that the City delay issuing the Request for Proposals
for redevelopment of the Johnston and Mecklenburg Mills until February 2007.
7
Attachment B
FY08-09 Focus Area Plan
Housing and Neighborhood Development Committee
January 17, 2007
Committee Request:
Receive as information the draft FY08-09 Housing and Neighborhood Development Focus
Area Plan.
Policy Framework:
• Annually the City Council reviews and amends the focus area plans for each of its five
focus areas – Community Safety, Economic Development, Environment, Housing and
Neighborhood Development and Transportation.
Project Description:
ƒ The City staff has updated the Housing and Neighborhood Development Focus Area
Plan, which included reviewing and updating as appropriate the focus area theme,
description, strategic objectives and objective targets.
ƒ The following strategic objectives are being proposed for the FY08-09 plan:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Reduce the number of Challenged neighborhoods
Expand the supply of affordable housing
Eliminate sub-standard housing and neighborhood nuisances
Graduate revitalization neighborhoods
Success of neighborhood problem-solving initiatives
Invest in comprehensive infrastructure improvements
ƒ
There is one new strategic objective suggested this year, neighborhood problem
solving initiatives. This objective tracks and measures the City’s success in working
with neighborhoods to resolve problems.
ƒ
Also, the targets for affordable housing and infrastructure have been adjusted to
reflect the Council’s spending priorities.
ƒ
The City Council will have an opportunity to discuss and amend the strategic plan at
the upcoming City Council Retreat planned for January 31, 2007 thru February 2,
2007.
Attachment:
Draft FY08-09 Housing and Neighborhood Development Focus Area Plan
1
City of Charlotte
FY2008 & FY 2009 Strategic Focus Area Plan DRAFT
“Creating great neighborhoods in which
to live, work, and play.”
The City of Charlotte’s long-term health, vitality, and distinction as a leading city is predicated upon its ability
to develop and sustain its neighborhoods. Social changes, crime and disorder, physical deterioration, and
economic divestments create challenges for the City’s residential, commercial and industrial neighborhoods.
The City’s housing and neighborhood strategy focuses on quality of life measures, expanding affordable
housing, effective code enforcement, infrastructure investments, and successful neighborhood revitalization
initiatives. The City will be responsive to addressing the needs of all neighborhoods, but will develop unique
approaches and solutions to address each of the City’s challenged, transitioning, and stable neighborhoods. (Also
see Community Safety, Economic Development and Transportation Focus Area Plans for more housing and neighborhood
development strategies.)
2008 & 2009
Page 1
City of Charlotte
FY2008& FY2009 Strategic Focus Area Plan
Housing & Neighborhood
Development
DRAFT
Strengthen Neighborhoods
H&ND.1
►
Focus Area Initiative:
Measure:
Target:
Target:
Prior Year:
Reduce the number of challenged neighborhoods
Number of fragile neighborhood statistical area (NSAs)
FY2009 - n/a
FY2008 - 22
FY2007 - n/a
FY2006 - 24
H&ND.2
►
Focus Area Initiative:
Measure:
Target:
Target:
Prior Year:
Expand the supply of affordable housing
Number of completed affordable housing units
FY2009 - 600
FY2008 - 800
FY2007 - 1,000
FY2006 - 1,187
H&ND.3
►
Focus Area Initiative:
Measure:
Eliminate sub-standard housing and neighborhood nuisances
Number of housing units, nuisance complaints and zoning citations
brought into compliance
FY2009 - Housing - 2,700
Nuisance - 37,000
Zoning - 5,750
FY2008 - Housing - 2,600
Nuisance - 36,000
Zoning - 5,500
FY2007 - Housing - 2,500
Nuisance - 35,600
Zoning - 5,250
FY2006 - Housing - 2,569
Nuisance - 37,204
Zoning - n/a
Target:
Target:
Prior Year:
H&ND.4
►
Focus Area Initiative:
Measure:
Target:
Prior Year:
H&ND.5
►
Focus Area Initiative:
Measure:
Target:
Prior Year:
Neighborhoods that have graduated from the revitalization plan process
Number of revitalization neighborhoods completed (8 neighborhoods
have revitalization plans)
FY2009 - 1
FY2008 - 1
FY2007 - None
FY2006 - 1
Educate and engage residents in maintaining model neighborhood
standards
Percent of neighborhood organizations implementing successful problem
solving initiatives
Number
Success Ratio
FY2009 - 360
80%
FY2008 - 360
80%
FY2007 - 310
80%
FY2006 - 110
99%
Page 2
City of Charlotte
FY2008 & FY2009 Strategic Focus Area Plan
Housing & Neighborhood
Development
DRAFT
Invest in Infrastructure
H&ND.1
►
Focus Area Initiative:
Measure:
Target:
Prior Year:
Invest in comprehensive neighborhood infrastructure
City neighborhood infrastructure investments vs. infrastructure needs
FY2009 - $15.0 million/$651 million
FY2008 - $12.5 million/$651 million
FY2007 - $12.5 million/$651 million
FY2006 - $ 8.8 million/$548 million
Page 3
Attachment C
Follow Up Report
Housing and Neighborhood Development Committee
January 17, 2007
The following items are requests for information that resulted from the December 11, 2006
H&ND Committee Meeting:
Committee Request: Provide information to citizens about composting.
Result: Neighborhood Development will add a link to its website concerning composting
and lawn maintenance.
Committee Request: Provide names of citizen volunteers for the Housing Symposium.
Result: See attached list of volunteers who have agreed to serve on sub-committees, help
with event preparation and provide service on the day of the event the 18
volunteers.
Committee Request: Provide base line figure used in the 2006 Transportation Action Plan,
as it pertains to providing access to transit.
Result: As part of effectively integrating land use and transportation, CDOT has been
tracking this data since 2003. In 2003, it was calculated that 63.2% of the City's
population was within 1/4 mile of transit (bus service). At that time, CDOT
established the 65% benchmark as a goal it would seek to achieve. Unfortunately,
the trend is going in the wrong direction, as that percentage has dropped to 61.2%
in 2006.
In the next couple of months, CDOT and other staff will be presenting information
to Council's Transportation Committee about this trend and other factors affecting
implementation of the Transportation Action Plan (TAP).
Committee Request: Make information on the Housing Charlotte 2007 accessible to Council
members.
Result: Housing Charlotte 2007 website is operational. Refer to HousingCharlotte2007.org
1
Attachment C
12th Annual Neighborhood Symposium
Citizen Volunteers
The following is a list of volunteers who agreed to serve on sub-committees, help with event
preparation and provide service on the day of the event. Other volunteers will include city
and county staff, youth groups and non-profit partners. In addition, several civic
organizations have committed volunteers, including Leadership Charlotte, Junior League of
Charlotte, Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority and Las Amigas, Inc.
Volunteer Name
Ms. Bailey
Mary Boyd
Katherine Cara
Bee Jay Caldwell
Debra Campbell
Beverly Clark
Dee L. Davis
Martin Doss
Diane English
Darryl Gaston
Geraldine Johnson
Cheryl Harden
Sabrina Kennedy
Jean Leier
Marsha Livingston
Mattie Marshall
Dewanna McNeely
Nola Murphy
Carol Scally
Debra Smith
Mark Sprinkle
Helen Thompson
Stephanie Walker
E-Mail
wilfredbailey@aol.com
mlboyd@carolina.rr.com
katherinealexandracara@yahoo.com
Telephone
704-875-0367
704-523-6163
704-393-7123
ddavis@pcmnc.com
martydoss@aol.com
aqua4265@msn.com
704-375-1051
gerriemj@yahoo.com
charden@bellsouth.net
sskennedy@aol.com
704-432-0496
freshideas678@yahoo.com
ysamarsh@carolina.rr.com
704-641-2355
704-493-1631
scallywag4nc@yahoo.com
704-7166513
Msprinkle1@carolina.rr.com
704-333-5430
swalk5130@bellsouth.net
2