Homework #5 Do problems 11.1, 11.2, 11.3, 11.4, & 11.5 on page 265. CBEN 408 Spring 2016 -1- March 31, 2016 Solutions Problem #11.1 (10 points) A gas contract specifies that the water content must be 4 lb/MMscf or lower. What is this specification in mg/Nm3, ppmv, and ppmw? Assume the molar mass of the gas is 18. Solution The table to the right shows the results for this problem.1 Note the following for the calculations: The conversion for scf to Nm³ involves not only the unit conversion for ft³ to m³ but must also take into account the change in the reference temperature (standard temperature is 60°F & the normal temperature is 0°C/32°F). The conversion is the same whether the MMscf is on a wet or dry basis. So: lb g mg 6 scf lb X 4 453.59237 1000 0.02679 10 lb g MMscf MMscf MMscf mg 68 Nm3 The ideal gas volume fraction (or ppmv) is essentially the molar fraction. The conversion is slightly different depending on whether the MMscf are on a dry or wet basis (though for all practical purposes the numbers will be the same because the molecular weights are about the same & because the water content is so low). For the MMscf on a wet basis: lb lb 4 MMscf 18.015 lb.mol 106 84 ppmv X 6 MMscf 1 379.5 10 lb.mol For the MMscf on a dry basis we have to add the contribution of the water into the denominator: lb lb 4 MMscf 18.015 lb.mol X 106 84 ppmv lb lb 6 MMscf 1 379.5 10 4 18.015 lb.mol MMscf lb.mol Note that the numbers shown may be slightly different from hand calculations because of the number of digits retained in intermediate calculations. 1 CBEN 408 Spring 2016 -2- March 31, 2016 Just like the ppmv, the mass fraction (or ppmw) is essentially the same whether the MMscf is on a wet or dry basis, mostly because the molecular weigt of the hydrocarbon portion is essentially the same as the molecular of water. Since these molecular weights are essentially equal: lb 4 MMscf X 106 84 ppmw lb MMscf 18 lb.mol 379.5 lb.mol CBEN 408 Spring 2016 -3- March 31, 2016 Problem #11.2 (10 points) Estimate the water content of a natural gas (molar mass of 18) at 1000 psia (69 bara) and 100°F (38°C) by using Figure 11.1a and by using Equation 11.2. (See Appendix B for vapor pressure of water.) Solution The table to the right shows the specified values as well as intermediate & final results.1,2 The determination of the water content from Figure 11.1a is pretty straightforward. The vapor pressure of water can be determined using the equation & coefficients in Appendix B. Note that the numbers shown may be slightly different from hand calculations because of the number of digits retained in intermediate calculations. 2 The pure component parameters & chart values are from the Kidnay, et. al. text book. 1 CBEN 408 Spring 2016 -4- March 31, 2016 B vap PH2O exp A C ln T DT E T 7258.2 exp 73.649 7.3037 ln T 4.1653 106 T 2 T 7258.2 2 exp 73.649 7.3037 ln 310.9 4.1653 106 310.9 310.9 6550 Pa 0.95 psia So: yH2O vap PH2O 0.95 0.00095 P 1000 and the water content (based on wet gas scf) will be: X H2O yH2O MH2O 0.00095118.015 45.1 lb/MMscf Vstd 379.49 106 Note that the water content based on dry gas basis will be: X H2O 0.00095118.015 yH2O MH2O 45 lb.2/MMscf 1 yH2O Vstd 1 0.000951 379.49 106 Note: this value can also be estimated from appropriate software, such as HYSYS. Using a methane/ethane mixture as shown & the Peng-Robinson EOS the water content will be: X H2O 0.00121518.015 yH2O MH2O 58 lb/MMscf 1 yH2O Vstd 1 0.001215 379.49 106 CBEN 408 Spring 2016 -5- March 31, 2016 Problem #11.3 (5 points) Determine the correction needed for molar mass of the gas in Exercise 11.2 using Figure 11.1b. What is the additional correction needed if the gas is in contact with produced water containing 2% by weight brine? Solution The table to the right shows the specified values as well as intermediate & final results.1,2 The dry gas’s specific gravity is nearly 0.6 so there is very little correction to the figure’s value. The correction for the brine’s salinity is greater, & reduces the water content to Note that the numbers shown may be slightly different from hand calculations because of the number of digits retained in intermediate calculations. 2 The pure component parameters & chart values are from the Kidnay, et. al. text book. 1 CBEN 408 Spring 2016 -6- March 31, 2016 Problem #11.4 (15 points) A field TEG unit is required to produce a gas (molar mass of 22) that will not condense water at 40°F and 500 psia (4°C and 34 bara). Gas to the glycol unit is water saturated at 110°F and 300 psia and the flow rate is 80 MMscfd (25 N-m³/s). a. Using a TEG rate of 3 gal/lb (0.025 m³/kg) of water removed, what will be the minimum glycol circulation rate in gpm (m3/h)? Utility costs are $0.04 per kwh for the compressor motor and $5.00 per MMBtu ($4.75/GJ) for fuel gas. b. The TEG unit has a regeneration duty equal to the heat required to vaporize the removed water with an overall efficiency of 33%. Assume TEG regeneration temperature of 400°F (204°C). Compute the daily heater fuel energy cost. Solution The table to the right shows the specified values as well as intermediate & final results.1,2 Note the following about the given data & the results: Though not clearly called out the rate given, 80 MMscfd, will be used for the dry gas portion of the gas. The contribution for the water in the gas needs to be added on top of this. The water heat of vaporization is calculated specifically at the regeneration temperature, 400°F. There is no compression in this process so these cost contributions are absent. Note that the numbers shown may be slightly different from hand calculations because of the number of digits retained in intermediate calculations. 2 The pure component parameters & chart values are from the Kidnay, et. al. text book. 1 CBEN 408 Spring 2016 -7- March 31, 2016 The first step is to determine the water contents at the inlet & dried conditions. The copy of Fig. 11.1a on the right shows that these water contents are 200 & 14.5 lb/MMscf, respectively. The figure below 11.1a shows the specific gravity corrections. The correction at the inlet temperature, 110°F, can be read from the chart. However, the expected curve at the dried condition is not on the chart; it is expected to be 1. Note: these values can also be estimated form appropriate software, such as HYSYS. Using a methane/ethane mixture as shown & the Peng-Robinson EOS the water content at the initial condition (dry gas basis) will be: X H2O 0.004520 18.015 yH2O MH2O 215.6 lb/MMscf 1 yH2O Vstd 1 0.004520 379.49 106 and the dried target will be: X H2O 0.000278 18.015 yH2O MH2O 13.2 lb/MMscf 1 yH2O Vstd 1 0.000278 379.49 106 CBEN 408 Spring 2016 -8- March 31, 2016 Now that we know the water contents we need to determine how much water is to be removed. Noting that the gas flowrate is on a dry basis: mabs 196.8 14.580 14580 lb/day The TEG flowrate is based on the given rate of 3 gal TEG per lb H2O: gal lb H2O 1 day gal EG * . VTEG 3 14580 30.4 day 24 60 min min lb H2O The heat required to boil off the absorbed water & regenerate the TEG (as well as ultimately figuring out how much fuel gas is needed to do this) is based on the heat of vaporization of water at the regeneration temperature, 400°F. From the steam tables in the back of the textbook the enthalpy of saturated vapor & liquid are 1202.2 Btu/lb & 375.3 Btu/lb, respectively; the heat of vaporization will be the difference between these two values, 826.9 Btu/lb. So the heat needed to regenerate the TEG & the associated cost is: Qregen lb H2O Btu 14580 day 826.9 lb H2O Btu 36.5 106 0.33 day Cost 36.5 MMBtu $ $183 per day 5 day MMBtu There is no recompression is the TEG dehydration process so there are no associated costs, either. CBEN 408 Spring 2016 -9- March 31, 2016 Problem #11.5 (20 points) A field 4A molecular sieve adsorbent system is required to produce a gas (molar mass of 22) that will not condense water at 40°F and 500 psia (4°C and 34 bara). Gas to the unit is water-saturated at 110°F (43°C) and 300 psia (21 bara) and the flow rate is 80 MMscfd (89 x 103Nm³/h). The loading averages 10% (by weight) of water on the adsorbent bed, the superficial velocity in the adsorbent vessel is 40 feet per minute (0.20 m/s). The dehydrator uses an adsorption time of 8 hours, and heats and cools in 4 hours each. a. What mass of adsorbent is needed to remove the water? b. What are the dimensions of the adsorbent bed? For the adsorbent system, assume the vessel wall thickness is 2” (50 mm) and uses steel with a density of 500 lb/ft³ (6.4 kg/m³). The heat capacity of the steel is 0.12 Btu/lb-°F (0.5 kJ/kg-K). Ignore the vessel heads but include 5 feet (1.5m) of extra shell for bed supports and screens. Ignore heat losses to the surroundings and assume the heat of adsorption is equal to the heat of vaporization of water. c. What is the required regeneration duty to heat the bed to 450°F (230°C)? The adsorbent system has a pressure drop of 15 psi (1 bar). Utility costs are $0.04 per kWh for the compressor motor and $5.00 per MMBtu ($4.75/GJ) for fuel gas. Assume the regeneration gas heater has an efficiency of 75%. d. Compute the daily energy cost for both heater fuel and compression (see Chapter 9 for compression). Solution The table to the right shows the initial calculations to determine the amount of water to be adsorbed.1,2 Note the following about the given data & the results: Though not clearly called out the rate given, 80 MMscfd, is for the dry gas portion of the gas. The contribution for the water in the gas needs to be added on top of this. Note that the numbers shown may be slightly different from hand calculations because of the number of digits retained in intermediate calculations. 2 The pure component parameters & chart values are from the Kidnay, et. al. text book. 1 CBEN 408 Spring 2016 - 10 - March 31, 2016 The first step is to determine the water contents at the inlet & dried conditions. The copy of Fig. 11.1a on the right shows that these water contents are 200 & 14.5 lb/MMscf, respectively. The figure below 11.1a shows the specific gravity corrections. The correction at the inlet temperature, 110°F, can be read from the chart. However, the expected curve at the dried condition is not on the chart; it is expected to be 1. Note: these values can also be estimated form appropriate software, such as HYSYS. Using a methane/ethane mixture as shown & the Peng-Robinson EOS the water content at the initial condition (dry gas basis) will be: X H2O 0.004520 18.015 yH2O MH2O 215.6 lb/MMscf 1 yH2O Vstd 1 0.004520 379.49 106 and the dried target will be: X H2O 0.000278 18.015 yH2O MH2O 13.2 lb/MMscf 1 yH2O Vstd 1 0.000278 379.49 106 CBEN 408 Spring 2016 - 11 - March 31, 2016 The next step is to determine the bed characteristics as shown in the table on the right. Note the following about the given data & the results: The actual flowrate is used to determine the superficial velocity in the bed, not the standard velocity. The actual flowrate can be calculated from the standard flowrate by using pressure & temperature ratios (actual to standard) but must also include the water content. The calculation for the actual flowrate is: P* Vact V * Pact Tact * T 14.69596 psia 110 459.67 °R 80.33 MMscfd 300 psia 60 459.67 °R 4.13 MMcfd and the minimum bed diameter to meet the superficial velocity spec is: Amin P* V act V * vmax Pact Amin Tact * T ft³ 4.13 106 day 71.7 ft² 40 ft 24 60 min min day 4 71.7 ft² 4 Amin 2 Dmin Dmin 9.56 ft 4 In the U.S. vessel dimensions are usually in ½ ft increments, so the actual diameter will be 10 ft. CBEN 408 Spring 2016 - 12 - March 31, 2016 Next, the mass amount of mole sieve material is used to determine the bed height: msieve 14580 lb 8 hr 24 hr 48620 lb Sieve lb H2O 0.1 lb Sieve Vsieve hmin 48620 lb Sieve 1080 ft³ Sieve lb Sieve 45 ft³ 1080 ft³ Sieve 0.25 10 ft 2 13.8ft h 14 ft Now we can determine the heat required for regeneration. Note the following about the given data & the results: Per guidelines there is a 50°F difference between the regeneration temperature & the regen gas to the mole sieve. We’ll assume the temperature given is the regen temperature & the temperature of the regen gas (not requested) is 50°F above this. Heat must not only be provided to vaporize the water off of the adsorbent at the regen temperature. But we must also heat up the water, vessel, & sieve from the bed adsorption temperature to the regeneration temperature (110°F to 450°F). Per the guidelines only 40% of the heat from the hot regen gas is actually absorbed by the water, vessel, & mole sieve material. The number of cycles per day is not controlled by the heating time, but rather the combined heating & cooling time (which will match up to the time for adsorption). So there will be 3 cycles per day. CBEN 408 Spring 2016 - 13 - March 31, 2016 The actual amount of mole sieve material is slightly different from the minimum amount calculated because of the change of minimum bed dimensions to ones at ½ ft increments. The volume of steel (neglecting the heads) will be found from the thickness of the shell: 2 2 2 2 Douter Dinner H Dinner 2t Dinner H tDinner t 2 H Dinner t tH 4 4 . 2 2 10 ft ft 14 5 ft 101.1 ft³ 12 12 Vsteel and the volume of the mole sieve bed is: 2 Dinner H 4 . 2 10 ft 14 ft 1100 ft³ 4 Vsieve The total heat needed to bring the vessel & sieve up to the regeneration temperature (per cycle) will be: Qsolid sieveVsieveC p ,sieve vesselVvesselC p ,vessel Tregen Tads lb Btu lb Btu 45 1100ft³ 0.25 500 101.1ft³ 0.12 450 110 °F . °F lb ft³ °F lb ft³ 6.27 106 Btu The heat needed to bring the water to the regen temperature & then vaporize (per cycle) will be: Qwater mwater H Tregen H Tads H vap 4840 lb 351.88 775.41 Btu/lb 5.48 106 Btu The total heat needed to the regen gas will be: Qsolid Qwater Qloss 0.4 Btu Btu Btu 2.5 6.27 5.48 106 29.4 106 88.1 106 cycle cycle day Qregen with the daily total coming from 3 cycles per day. So the associated cost is: Cost 88.1 MMBtu $ $441 per day . 5 day MMBtu CBEN 408 Spring 2016 - 14 - March 31, 2016 The compression costs will come from recompressing the dried gas back to the inlet pressure. Note the following about the given data & the results: The gas’s heat capacity ratio was not given. A typical value of 1.3 was used. The compressor’s efficiency was not given. A typical value of 70% was used. No information was given about the outlet temperature from the mole sieve unit. It was assumed that there was only a minimal change, so it is the same as the inlet. The isentropic work of compression was calculated as: 1 / P2 ˆ Ws RT1 1 1 P1 1.9859 110 459.67 1.31 /1.3 1.3 300 1 1.3 1 285 58.4 Btu/lb.mol At 70% efficiency for the compression: Wˆ 58.4 Wˆ s ,act s 83.4 Btu/lb.mol IS 0.7 So, the power needed is: scf 1 lb.mol Btu Btu P N Wˆ s ,act 80 106 17.6 106 83.4 day 379.49 scf lb.mol day The other power values were determined by converting the units as appropriate. CBEN 408 Spring 2016 - 15 - March 31, 2016