Examples of Best Practices From the January 2014 Graduate Program Assessment Reports Note: This list is not meant to be exhaustive, but is intended to highlight positive aspects of graduate assessment plans at Mines. Applied Math and Statistics Faculty have defined sub-outcomes (which describe specific skills and or types of knowledge) for each of the three Master’s level outcomes, which facilitates measurement of students’ achievement of these skills. Faculty have mapped these specific skills/bodies of knowledge to the courses. Chemical and Biological Engineering Faculty have convened periodic meetings and held a departmental retreat to discuss graduate program/student assessment issues. Mining Engineering Faculty will utilize activities which are already embedded into the program (such as the thesis defense, comprehensive exams, and graduate seminar presentations) to assess the outcomes, rather than creating assessment methods which are not embedded into the program. This approach is characteristic of a sustainable assessment plan. Petroleum Engineering Use of rubrics to assess writing and oral presentation skills may provide consistent, detailed, and objective measures of students’ achievement of outcomes, both over time and across groups of students. Suggestions for Consideration We strongly encourage faculty to utilize activities which are already embedded into the program (such as the thesis defense, comprehensive exams, and graduate seminar presentations) to assess the outcomes, rather than creating assessment methods which are not embedded into the program. This approach is characteristic of a sustainable assessment plan. If you would like the committee to provide sample rubrics to support this type of assessment, please let us know or visit http://inside.mines.edu/assessment/Sample-Rubrics. The Office of Graduate Studies conducts an exit survey of graduating students. Faculty can request the survey results for their students and could use them as part of their assessment plan. Faculty could track publication and/or citation rates, conference presentation rates, patent rates, and external funding rates to demonstrate achievement of outcomes or objectives. Programs could adopt the “Thesis Committee Reporting” form (see the assessment website) to monitor students’ progress through the program. Some departments rely on grades (which do not provide faculty with detailed information about specific levels of knowledge or skill development) as part of their assessment plan. Grades provide a global measure of achievement which are not necessarily standardized over time and among faculty. Use of rubrics, which divide an assignment, project, etc. into specific, measurable components, would facilitate assessment of outcomes based on consistent criteria. While course passage and passage of exams contribute to program completion and success, they are typically minimum expectations for continued enrollment. It would be most useful for faculty to make a distinction between different types of skills/knowledge and students’ achievement of these skills in their courses, theses, etc. beyond these minimum thresholds. This approach will enable faculty to track areas of strength and opportunities for improvement over time and among students, which is likely to be much more useful information than just monitoring the number of students who pass and fail the qualifying exams. There may be a disconnect between faculty expectations for students’ knowledge as at the time of the qualifying exam and use of this exam to demonstrate “exemplary” disciplinary expertise. Faculty in some programs have defined sub-outcomes (which describe specific skills and/or types of knowledge) for each of the outcomes. This facilitates measurement of students’ achievement of these skills. Faculty have mapped these specific skills/bodies of knowledge to the courses, to enable them to identify where students have the opportunity to develop these skills and knowledge. While this approach is certainly not required, you may consider whether this strategy would provide you with useful insights about student learning.