Establishing a National Standardization Secretariat: NSS Options and Resource Requirements

advertisement

ITU Regional Standardization Forum for Asia-Pacific

(Jakarta, Indonesia, 27-28 October 2015)

Establishing a National

Standardization Secretariat:

NSS Options and Resource Requirements

Gary Fishman

Pearlfisher International gryfishman@aol.com

1

NSS-General Level: Start Up Phase

• Limited resources

• Little or no ITU-T

Study Group

involvement

• Participate in higher-level ITU bodies

(Guidelines §2)

2

Responsible Agency (RA)

• Use existing resources as much as possible

• Responsible Agency has been authorized, or one can be agreed informally among involved agencies:

– Responsible for PP, Council, Member State (MS) issues

– Point of contact to ITU

– Approve contributions, Sector Member (SM) applications

– Approve MS delegations to ITU meetings

– Create T-NAC and appoint T-NAC Chairman

3

T-NAC

– The main working level advisory committee for the NSS-General Level

– Responsible for all ITU-T matters of interest, including WTSA, TSAG and SGs

– Open to public and private participants

– Can create ad hoc groups as needed, e.g.:

WTSA, TSAG, a Study Group

– Draft national process procedures

– Acts as preparatory group for ITU-T meetings

4

Secretariat Bureau

• Secretariat administrative functions are provided from within RA or contracted by

RA

– Monitor Circulars and other ITU communications, and facilitate responses

– Develop and maintain a website and email lists

– Support national level meetings

– Record-keeping

5

NSS General Level

Priorities

• Top priorities for the NSS-General Level:

– Draft enabling legislation (if required)

• Including funding!

– Establish national procedures

6

Moving Up To NSS-Study Group Level

Funding

Responsible Agency

National Advisory Committee (NAC) for ITU

(PP, Council, Budget, MS dues…)

Secretariat

Bureau

D-NAC R-NAC T-NAC

(Subcommittees: WTSA, TSAG, SGs)

• Participate in ITU-T SGs

• Operational functions NSG M

of RA move down to a NAC

• One National Study Group (NSG)

NSG N NSG X

for each ITU-T SG of interest

7

NSS-Study Group Level: RA

• Overall responsibility for ITU matters, assigned under enabling legislation

• Ensure stable funding

• Approve national procedures

• Approve MS contributions

• Official point of contact with ITU

• Approve SM applications for membership

• Appoints NAC Chair and T-NAC Chair

8

NSS-Study Group Level: NAC

• Open to public and private sector

• Chairs of T-NAC, R-NAC, D-NAC and NSGs are members of NAC

• Preparatory group for ITU-level events, e.g.,

Plenipot, Council

• Maintain national procedures for ITU

• Parent body to T-NAC, R-NAC and D-NAC

• Addresses ITU-level and cross-Sector issues

9

NSS-Study Group Level: T-NAC

• Continues from the T-NAC of General Level

• Open to public and private sector

• Create National Study Groups, only as needed, one-to-one with ITU-T SGs

– T-NAC chair appoints NSG Chairs

• Change former ad hoc groups into permanent subcommittees of T-NAC, e.g.:

– SC-Policy: ITU-T policy matters and WTSA

– SC-TSAG: TSAG

– SC-SG: General and cross-SG matters

10

NSS-Study Group Level:

National Study Group

• One NSG for each ITU-T SG of interest

• Open to public and private sector

• Preparatory group for the ITU-T SG and related regional groups, e.g.:

– Prepare contributions

– Propose national delegation members

– Report on ITU-T meeting results

11

Moving Up To NSS-Full Sector Level

Funding

Responsible Agency

National Advisory Committee (NAC) for ITU

(PP, Council, Budget, MS dues…)

Secretariat

Bureau

D-NAC R-NAC T-NAC

(Subcommittees: WTSA, TSAG, networks, svcs)

• Participate in most NSG 2 NSG 3

or all ITU-T SGs

• Sufficient resources

• One National Study Group (NSG) for each ITU-T SG

12

NSG 20

Communications with ITU-T

• How many communications does TSB send to Member States?

– About 300 Circulars, 100 Collective Letters and

100 Recommendation approval Notifications per 4-year study period: 1 every 2 or 3 days!

13

~300 Circulars per study period

Consultation on deletion of a

Rec and notice it is deleted, 15,

5%

Consultation on deletion of a

Question and notice it is deleted, 15, 5%

Questionnaire,

30, 10%

Informationonly, 15, 5%

Meeting notices, 75, 25%

Formal consultation of

Member States for Rec’n approval process, 30, 10%

Announcement that a Rec or

Question was approved or not approved, 60,

20%

Announcement of a workshop, seminar, forum, tutorial , 60,

20%

Legend: Type of Circular,

number, % of total.

Dashed outline: Possible response to TSB.

14

Human Resources (Headcount)

Human Resource

Senior Manager

(RA)

Manager

Assistant Manager

National Standardization Secretariat

General

Level

Headcount

Study Group

Level

Headcount

Full Sector

Level

Headcount

0.2 0.2-1 1

0

1

0-1 (or 3)

1-2 (or 4)

1 (or 3)

2 (or 4)

Support Staff

Secretariat Bureau

(n) For all 3 ITU Sectors

0.4

0

0.4-2

1

2

~2

15

Travel Estimates (% of time/person)

National Standardization Secretariat

General Level

Travel time

Study Group Level

Travel time

Full Sector Level

Travel time

Senior

Manager

10% 10-30% 30-40%

0% 0-30% 30-40% Manager

Assistant

Manager

0% 0-20% 20-30%

16

Other Resource Requirements

• Chairs and secretaries of National

Advisory Committees, ad hoc groups,

NSGs, etc. are provided on a voluntary basis by those interested and participating in the work

– Not part of the NSS funding requirements

• Website, e-working method facilities

• ITU (and other organization) dues

17

Funding

• At the NSS-General Level, until secure funding is arranged, it should be possible to initiate a national process and structure without major new funding resources, for example:

– Senior Manager (RA) could serve as Chairman of T-NAC

– Secretariat Bureau functions could be provided by sharing existing RA support staff

18

Funding

• Legislation giving the RA responsibility for ITU/ITU-T should also provide for allocation of sufficient funds to carry out that role, including:

– Staff

– Travel

– Communication facilities

– Website

– Membership dues

– Secretariat Bureau

19

Alternative Funding Sources

• Contributions from other involved agencies – problematical

– Can lead to conflicts over leadership roles

• Solicit resources or impose obligations on participating private entities

– Useful only when there is a small number of players (e.g., an incumbent operator) but NOT sustainable nor recommended when there is a competitive private sector

20

Thank you

Gary Fishman

Pearlfisher International gryfishman@aol.com

21

Download