Transportation & Planning Committee
Monday, February 11, 2013
3:30 – 5:00 p.m.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Government Center
Room 280
Committee Members:
Staff Resource:
David Howard, Chair
Michael Barnes, Vice Chair
John Autry
Warren Cooksey
Patsy Kinsey
Ruffin Hall, Assistant City Manager
AGENDA
I.
MPO Update – 20 minutes
Staff Resource: Bob Cook, Planning
Staff will provide the Committee with the latest updates.
Action: For information only
II.
Capital Investment Plan Referrals – 70 minutes
Staff Resources: Danny Pleasant, Transportation
Jim Keenan, Engineering & Property Management
Alysia Osborne, Planning
Staff will continue reviewing the capital projects referred to the Transportation and Planning
Committee. Examples include the Cross-Charlotte Trail, Northeast Corridor Bridges,
East/Southeast Corridor Projects and the Northeast Corridor Investments (NECI).
Action: For information only
Attachment:
Zoning Board of Adjustment Annual Report
Attachments: Follow-up information from the January 14 Committee meeting:
− Population Employment Projections
Follow-up information from the January 30 Committee meeting:
− Sidewalk projects by Council District (recently completed and future
projects)
− Council District 7 Projects
− Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Evaluation Process, High Accident
Locations and Safety Warrants
− Pedestrian Crossing Evaluation Process
− MUMPO Budget Information
Next Scheduled Meeting: Thursday, February 28, 2013 – 12:00 p.m.
Future Topics –CIP (continued), FY2014 Focus Area Plan, and Parking and Housing near Colleges and
Universities
Distribution:
Mayor & City Council
Transportation Cabinet
Alysia Osborne
Julie Burch, Interim City Manager
Bob Cook
Jim Keenan
Leadership Team
Danny Pleasant
MEMORANDUM
FROM THE
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
February 6, 2013
Transportation and Planning Committee Members
Stephanie C. Kelly, CMC, City Clerk
Zoning Board of Adjustment Annual Report
The attached report of the Zoning Board of Adjustment is being sent to you pursuant to the
Resolution related to Boards and Commissions adopted by City Council at the November 23, 2009
meeting. This resolution requires annual reports from City Council Boards and Commissions to be
distributed by the City Clerk to both City Council and to the appropriate Committee for review.
If you have questions or comments for this board, please convey those to staff support for a response
and/or follow-up.
Follow Up Information
Population and Employment Projections for Mecklenburg County
Presented to Transportation and Planning Committee on January 14, 2013
th
The information provided in this document is a follow up to the January 14 Transportation and Planning
Committee meeting. The data included here was requested by the committee members. Please contact
Ruchi Agarwal (704-336-8307) in Planning Department or Anna Gallup (704-336-8034) in CDOT for further
questions.
1. Historical trend showing Charlotte’s capture rate of Mecklenburg County’s Population (1960 – 2010)
We project a similar trend of 80% or higher capture rate for Charlotte in 2020, 2030 and 2040.
Note: Growth in the last decade due to annexations
Charlotte grew in the last decade (2000-2010) by 190,596 people or 35.2%. Out of this 123,916 people or
22.9% were due to annexations since 2000.
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning
1
01/31/13
2. Age, Occupation, Income and Home Value Trends for Charlotte in 2000 and 2010
The table below shows age, occupation and economic characteristics of Charlotte population in 2000 and
2010.
Charlotte Characteristics in 2000 and 2010
Age
2000
32.7
Median age (years)
(X)
2010
33.2
(X)
Less than 18 years
133,635
24.7%
184,651
25.2%
62 years and over
56,749
10.5%
79,591
10.9%
20 - 24 years
Occupation
41,513
7.7%
54,121
7.4%
2000
108,837
38.1%
2010
134,409
38.3%
Service
36,234
12.7%
56,744
16.2%
Sales & Office
83,330
29.2%
94,527
27.0%
Natural Resources, Construction & Maintenance
23,582
8.2%
25,537
7.3%
Production, Transportation & Material Moving
Economic Indicators
33,618
11.8%
39,517
11.3%
Management & Professional
Median Household Income
2000
2010
$ 46,975
$ 49,616
Median Value of Owner-Occupied Housing Units
$ 134,300
$ 177,300
*Data Source: 2000 Census and 2010 American Community Survery (ACS) 1-Year Estimates
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning
2
01/31/13
Median Household Income
Educational Attainment: Bachelor’s Degree or Higher
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning
3
01/31/13
3. Geographic Mobility Data
The table below shows in-migration data that includes Charlotte residents who have moved from a different
county within NC, different state or abroad. The data shows almost 57,000 people moved to Charlotte in
2011 which is 8% of the total population.
IN-MIGRATION POPULATION
Population
Estimate
%
AGE
Median age (years)
28
Less than 18 years
11,116
19%
18 to 24 years
13,624
24%
25 to 44 years
23,236
41%
45 to 64 years
7,530
13%
65 years and over
1,860
3%
White
30,078
53%
Black or African American
18,140
32%
505
1%
Asian
4,806
8%
Some other race
3,511
6%
Hispanic or Latino origin (of any race)
6,749
12%
RACE AND ETHNICITY
American Indian and Alaska Native
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Less than Bachelor's degree
18,294
56%
Bachelor's degree
8,985
28%
Graduate or professional degree
5,327
16%
Less than $25,000
21,635
52%
$25,000 to $49,999
11,371
28%
8,285
20%
Householder lived in owner-occupied housing units
14,532
27%
Householder lived in renter-occupied housing units
38,892
73%
INDIVIDUAL INCOME IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS (IN
2011 INFLATION-ADJUSTED DOLLARS)
Population 15 years and over
$50,000 or more
HOUSING TENURE
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2007-2011 American Community Survey
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning
4
01/31/13
4. Projected Absolute Population Growth in Mecklenburg County
Based on the population projections Mecklenburg County will see an increase of about 19,000 people
annually in next three decades.
Mecklenburg County
Population
2010
919,600
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning
2010 - 2020
Population Growth
2020 - 2030
2030 - 2040
192,700
188,600
191,200
21%
17%
15%
5
01/31/13
Sidewalk Program Projects by District
FY2010 – FY2012
Charlotte Department of Transportation
February 7, 2013
DISTRICT 1
Year
Street
Limit A
Limit B
Miles
District(s)
FY2010
Davidson
Iverson
Lyndhurst
Park Rd
Chiswick Rd
Firwood Drive
N Sharon Amity Rd
Park Rd
Vail Avenue
East Ford Road
Hollis Rd
Hartford Ave
E 36th St
Ideal Way
McDonald Avenue
At Kindercare
Colwick Rd
Briabend Dr
Addison Dr
Sunset Dr
Dotger Avenue
Matheson
Anson St
Hollis Rd
Anderson St
Lyndhurst Av
Magnolia Avenue
gap
Barwick Rd
Kenlough Dr
Emory Ln
Poindexter Dr
Cranbrook Lane
Shamrock
Hartford Ave
Auburn Ave
0.50
0.25
0.10
0.05
0.19
0.25
0.41
0.20
0.01
0.25
0.37
0.10
2.68
1
1
1
1
1
1
1&5
1
1
1
1
1
FY2010
FY2010
FY2010
FY2011
FY2011
FY2011
FY2011
FY2011
FY2012
FY2012
FY2012
Total
DISTRICT 2
Year
Street
Limit A
Limit B
Miles
District(s)
FY2010
Frasier Ave
Rozzelles Ferry Road
Hoskins Road
Newcastle St
Wesley Heights Way
Coulwood Dr
Gum Branch Rd
Gum Branch Rd
Kentberry Dr
McClure Cir
Pleasant Grove Rd
Valleydale Rd
Bellhaven Blvd
W 5th St
Hoskins Ave
Morgan St
Jennings St
Tuckaseegee Rd
Cathey Rd
Cathey Rd
Bellhaven Bv
Bellhaven Bv
Bellhaven Bv
McClure
Coulwood
Gum Branch
Existing sidewalk
Linwood Ave
Hoskins Avenue Dr
Kay St
Westbrook Dr
Valleydale
Kentberry Dr
Kentberry Dr
Coulwood Dr
Pleasant Grove Rd
Old Plank
Gum Branch
Kentberry Dr
Total
0.02
0.50
0.02
0.23
0.05
0.80
0.34
0.43
0.76
0.38
0.23
0.10
0.14
4.00
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
FY2010
FY2011
FY2011
FY2011
FY2012
FY2012
FY2012
FY2012
FY2012
FY2012
FY2012
FY2012
Sidewalk Program Projects by District
FY2010 – FY2012
Charlotte Department of Transportation
February 7, 2013
DISTRICT 3
Year
Street
Limit A
Limit B
Miles
District(s)
FY2010
FY2010
Bland St
Crisman St
Grover
Old Steele Creek
South Blvd
S. Tryon St
Alleghany Road
South Blvd
West Blvd
Arrowood Dr
0.05
0.10
0.09
0.27
0.55
3
3
3
3
3&5
FY2010
S Tryon St
Choate Cir
0.70
3
FY2010
FY2012
Tuckaseegee Road
Arrowood
Clanton Road
S Tryon St
W Tyvola Rd
Rozzelles Ferry Road
Green Street
Old Mt Holly
Windy Valley
Forestbrook
Hanson
Barringer
Choate Cir
Nations Ford Rd
Hovis
Rozzelles Ferry Road
Rozzelles Ferry Road
First Street
0.64
0.21
0.71
0.30
0.26
0.34
0.07
0.07
0.04
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
FY2012
Tuckaseegee Road
I-85 NB Ramps
0.10
3
FY2012
West Tremont Ave
West Tremont Ave
South Blvd
Pacific St
RR
Tyvola Rd
Sharon Lakes Rd
Old Steele Creek Rd
(NC160)
Browns Ave
Red Oak
Pelton
Steele Creek Rd
S Tryon St
Old Mt Holly Rd
Hovis
Windy Valley
Old Mt Holly Rd
Ashley Road (Ashley to
Edgewood)
Hawkins Ave
Total
0.10
4.60
3
Limit A
Limit B
Miles
District(s)
W Arrowhead Dr
N Tryon St
Fountain Grove Rd
gap
0.21
0.04
0.30
0.01
4
4
4
4
0.54
4
0.20
4
1.12
4
Grier Rd
End of street
Countryside Dr
Garrison Dr
n/a
E Mallard Creek
Church Rd
MHP Driveway
Newell-Hickory Grove
Rd
John Russell Rd
0.08
4
Tom Hunter Rd
Apt entrance
0.18
4
Vancouver
Reagan
0.18
2.86
4
FY2010
FY2010
FY2010
FY2011
FY2011
FY2011
FY2011
FY2012
FY2012
FY2012
DISTRICT 4
Year
Street
Countryside Dr
FY2010 W Arrowhead Dr
FY2010 Galloway Drive
FY2010 IBM Dr
FY2010
FY2010
John Kirk Dr
University City Blvd
FY2010
Orr Rd
North Tryon Street
FY2011
Grier Rd
Rocky River Rd E
Rocky River Rd E
Reagan Dr (I-85 Svc
FY2011
Rd)
FY2011 Tom Hunter Rd
FY2011
Total
Sidewalk Program Projects by District
FY2010 – FY2012
Charlotte Department of Transportation
February 7, 2013
DISTRICT 5
Year
Street
Shasta Ln
FY2010 South Blvd
FY2010 Wallace Ave
FY2011 N Sharon Amity Rd
FY2010
Limit A
Limit B
Miles
District(s)
Randolph Rd
Arrowood Dr
WT Harris
Addison Dr
Sardis Rd
Sharon Lakes Rd
Existing sidewalk
Emory Ln
0.80
0.55
0.07
0.41
1.83
5
3&5
5
1&5
Total
DISTRICT 6
Year
Street
Limit A
Limit B
Miles
District(s)
FY2010
Wintercrest Ln
Scofield Rd
0.33
6
FY2011
Colony Rd
Fairview Rd
0.23
6
FY2011
Fairview Rd
Haven Drive
Park Rd
Providence Rd
Boyce
Murrayhill Rd
Wedgewood Dr
Pinehurst
Wintercrest Ln
Reese Rd
Mockingbird Ln
Folger Ln
Sardis Rd
Woodlawn Rd
Seneca Pl
Wakefield
Fairview Rd
Colony Crossings Dr
(south int.)
Arundel Rd
Elementary School
gap
Blueberry Ln
Terrace Dr
Wedgewood Ln
Murrayhill Rd
Woodlawn
Total
0.17
0.06
0.05
0.24
0.45
1.40
0.28
0.20
3.41
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
Limit A
Limit B
Miles
District(s)
11831 Elm Lane
Bevington
Glenmore Gardens Dr
gap
Greenway
McKee Elementary
McMullen Creek
Greenway
Total
0.05
0.40
0.20
7
7
7
0.32
7
FY2011
FY2011
FY2011
FY2012
FY2012
FY2012
FY2012
DISTRICT 7
Year
Street
Elm Lane
FY2010 Elm Lane
FY2011 McKee Road
FY2010
FY2012
Castlekeep Road
Blue Heron Road
0.97
¯
Top 70 Future Sidewalk Program Projects
s
r
16
s
r
£
¤
s
¨
§
¦ r
16
21
115
77
District 4
District 2
s
sr
r
49
49
¨
§
¦
85
s
r
27
¨
§
¦
85
s
r
24
29
74
¨
§
¦
485
¤£
¨
¦
¤§
District 3 £
¨
§
¦
s
r
District 1
277
277
160
District 5
s
r
27
£
¤
s
r
74
218
s
r
51
s
r
16
District 6
s
r
49
District
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Projects
0
16
20
10
3
6
20
* Total includes 5 projects
that are in multiple districts.
Thoroughfares
Freeway
Major - Class III
Major thoroughfare
Minor thoroughfare
Freeway - Proposed
Major - Proposed
Minor - Proposed
District 7
¨
§
¦
485
£
¤
521
£
¤
521
Spheres of Influence
City Limits
Charlotte Sphere of Influence
Adjoining Municipalities and
Their Spheres of Influence
0
1
2
Miles
Planning & Design
February 6, 2013
CDOT Sidewalk Priority List
L:\GIS\Sidewalk
Top 70 Future Sidewalk Program Projects
Charlotte Department of Transportation
February 6, 2013
Rank
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
Street Name
North Sharon Amity Rd
Rea Road
Hovis Road
Reliance St/Bradford Dr
Rea Road
Providence Road
Pineville-Matthews Rd
W. Tyvola Road
Old Providence Road
Pineville-Matthews Rd
Brown-Grier Road
Sandy Porter Road
Sardis Road North
Beatties Ford Road
Johnston Road
Sharon Road
Little Rock Road
Marvin Road
North Tryon Street
Old Concord Road
WT Harris Boulevard
Ballantyne Commons Pkwy
Kuykendall Road
Salome Church Road
Wilkinson Boulevard
Ballantyne Commons Pkwy
Bellhaven Boulevard
Toddville Road
N. Hoskins Road
Wilkinson Boulevard
Elm Lane
Nations Ford Road
Oakdale Road
Providence Road West
Rea Road
S Hoskins Rd
Little Rock Road
North Tryon Street
Pavilion Boulevard
Limit A
Tangle Dr
Pineville - Matthews Road
Rozzelles Ferry Road
Rowan St
Piper Station Drive
Greentree Dr
Elizabeth Ln
Billy Graham Parkway
Sharon View Road
Echo Forest Dr
Steele Creek Road
3533 Sandy Porter Rd
Rittenhouse Circle
Sunset Rd
Marvin Road
Ferncliff Dr
Freedom Drive
Wilkee Drive
University City Boulevard (NC49)
Newell - Hickory Grove Road
I-85
Providence Road
Providence Road
View Drive
Boyer Street
Sir Francis Drake
Mt. Holly-Huntersville Road
Freedom Drive
Cricketeer Drive
Little Rock Road
Camfield St
Crompton
Auten Rd
Johnston Road
Windyrush Dr
Glenwood Dr
Wilkinson Boulevard
Arrowhead Drive
University City Blvd
Limit B
Craig Av
Fairways Club Drive
Brookshire Boulevard
S Hoskins Rd
I-485 Ramps
Knob Oak Lane
Sardis Plantation Dr
Rubine Street
English Meadows
Alexander Rd
Sandy Porter Road
Brown-Grier Road
Maple Shade Ln
McIntyre Ave
Copper Mountain Blvd
Sharon Ln
Tuckaseegee Road
Ardrey Kell Road
Mallard Creek Church Road
WT Harris Boulevard
Mallard Creek Road
Annalexa Lane
Hampton Oaks Ln
City Limit
Little Rock Road
Quail Acres Rd
Valleydale Rd
Rozzelles Ferry Road
Brookshire Boulevard
City Limits
Bryant Farms Rd
Moody Ridge
Peachtree Rd
Edindale Drive
Cedar Croft Dr
Gossett Av
I-85 SB Ramps
I-85 Connector
Harris Houston Road
District
5
7
2
2
7
6
7
3
6, 7
7
3
3
6
2
7
6
3
7
4
4
2, 4
7
7
4
3
7
2
2, 3
2
3
7
3
2
7
7
2
3
4
4
Top 70 Future Sidewalk Program Projects
Charlotte Department of Transportation
February 6, 2013
Rank
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
Street Name
Westinghouse Boulevard
Yorkmont Road
Rozzelles Ferry Road
Arrowood Rd
Providence Road
Rozzelles Ferry Road
Steele Creek Road
Johnston Road
Sardis Rd
Brookshire Blvd
Idlewild Road
Johnston-Oehler Road
Rea Road
Sardis Road North
Nations Ford Road
Tyvola Road
Arrowood Road
McKee Road
Mount Holly Road
Oakdale Road
Tilley Morris Road
University City Boulevard
Weddington Road
Margaret Wallace Road
Hovis Road
Arrowood Road
Little Rock Road
Moores Chapel Road
Pavilion Boulevard
Steele Creek Road
Sunset Road
Limit A
Granite
Tyvola Road
Brookshire Blvd
Bramblewood Road
Allison Lane
Hoskins Road
Sledge Rd
John J Delaney Drive
Sardis Road North
Oakdale Road
Oak Drive
Mallard Creek Road
Colony Rd
Sardis Road
Windsong
Yorkmont Road
Whitehall Executive Center Dr
Kuykendall
Freedom Drive
Peachtree Rd
McKee Road
WT Harris Ramps
Walker Road
Sam Newell Road
Tar Heel Road
I-77 NB Ramps
Tuckaseegee
Claremont Road
N Tryon St
Steele Oaks Drive
Glenlea Commons Drive
Limit B
Texland
Beam Road
Hart Road
Interstate 77
City Limit
Hovis Road
S Tryon Street
Ballentyne Crossing Avenue
Sardis View Ln
Bellhaven Road
Braewick Pl
Song Sparrow
Summerlin Pl
Rittenhouse Circle
Hebron
Billy Graham Parkway
Sandy Porter Road
Davis Drive
City Limits
City Limits
County Line
WT Harris Ramps
County Line
Idlewild Road
Rozzelles Ferry Road
I-77 SB Ramps
Keeter Drive
Old Moores Chapel Rd
Harris Houston Road
Brown-Grier Road
Brookfield Pointe Drive
District
3
3
2
3
7
2
3
7
6, 7
2
5
4
7
6
3
3
3
7
2, 3
2
7
4
7
5
2
3
3
4
4
3
2
Other Question and Answer
A response to the below question was requested by Mayor Foxx outside of the May 16th
Budget Adjustments meeting.
Question 1: How much capital investment has occurred within the Ballantyne area
geography over the past 20 years by the City (does not include Mecklenburg County
investments, including those made on behalf of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg School
System)?
For the purposes of this calculation, the Ballantyne area geography is defined as the
Council District 7 boundary (Attachment# 4). Total capital investments over the past 20
years are summarized below:
Investment Category
Affordable Housing
Business Investment Grants / Synthetic Tax
Increment Grants
Charlotte Area Transit System (CATS)*
Neighborhoods
Public Facilities
Storm Water
Transportation
Water / Sewer
Other (Intelligent Transportation System /
Landscaping)
TOTAL
Amount
$0.0
$12.9
$0.2
$5.6
$6.9
$26.6
$104.5
$264.1
$4.2
$425.0
in millions
* excludes buses
Budget Straw Votes
May 30, 2012
Page 43
Hy
Bv
N
Ar
row
rid
ge
t
P
oi
n
t
Bv
Ra
E Westin
Ln
0
r
Ga
Ln
Ma
in
St
225
ood
th W
Rd
r ro
WA
ke
La
w
vie
Ju
a
nit
r
Ol
ive
Dr
S
Pa
rk
Av
t
Ind
us
L
Colleg
e St
tria
l Dr
n
Ervin L
Vi
rg
an
Rd
Ln
nS
t
Sh
aro
a
r
r
129
Leitner D
5R
5
I-48
Ra
af D
Longle
I-48
Rd
Ln
Ct
e
Ed
n
Ct
Danby Rd
Gatestone
Bluffto
n
Harmon Ln
Dia
mo
nd
Dr
ge
rid
Ag
120
Hill
Rd
85
I-4
97
b
ay
W
nR
dW
est
Cressida Dr
231
in i
aP
ine
lC
t
Sw
ede
n
ebr
o
rm
Do
Green Birch D
r
M
Sam
Ballyliffin Dr
d
sR
k
e
e
y St
owr
Imp
eria
Ln
a
W
Wi
llow
R
Ra
e
at
114
Birn
en
Dr
idg
e
ta
Vis
Rd
Wo
87
a
Fl
r
nD
o
y
n
Ca
n
ue
Bl
ge L
d
i
rR
Dee
r
ll D
a
H
ral
o
l
F
n
rL
a
d
Ce
ple
Kap
te Ln
odga
Dr
Rd
ng
n
ro
I
t
Ke
tte
ri
ro
ok
Tre
e
Ln
Ln
Ben
tO
ak R
n Dr
Morabli
t
dC
o
o
w
rB
Innisfree Pl
n
Soaringfree L
Rd
on
t
f
i
T
Dr
De
e
Re
n is
to
n
Sm
ok
e
Bras
140
d
s Rd
r
r
Cr
Produced by Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning 06/20/11
Ct
ell Cr
Lissad
Dr
r
101
Qu
a
il R
Do
tts
C
d
Pr
o
Hill L
n
148
n
lk L
a
d
W
ar ell R
d
Ce y K
d re
Ar
Ln
Rd
Fo
xm
Dawnridge Dr
Carmel Hills
D
r
n
Dr
Dr
Zackery Av
Cr
os
s
Ca
rm
el
C
t
an
y
r
B
s
rm
a
F
Rd
Old C
Ln
ey
Ardr
g
Bu
H
t
r
Mo
o
r
M
or
ro
w
ey
a
86
t Ln
ic
k
R
d
se
or
d
R
n
232
Dr
cliff
e
s
Ro
s Py
mon
Snapfinger Dr
r
Co m
C
an
tyne
n
a
l
l
Ba
r
sD
He
at
h
bay
e
l
t
s
Ca
Dr
of
ldcr
e
i
F
t Dr
Rd
Tol
le
e
Ct
t
d
t
kC
airie
mD
Dr
100
r
Rd
un
d
Long Cov
eD
r
lC
tal
Ln
lC
t
nc
e
Cot
ta
Bar
dsto ge Dr
wn
Ma
Rd
ryh
urs
t Ln
Dr
Lawton Bluff
Dov
e
t Dr
ck
Rd
Ct
Be
ver
ly
112
Serape Rd
E I-485
Springs Mill Rd
Ln
rt y
n
ou
137
Ln
Sain
tfield
Pl
Alexa Rd
Hills
D
y
r
cop
aR
d
rly
ai
w
ie
nv
v
Dr
r
Sa
rd
St
Dr
Cou
nt
ev
5
n Ct
de
r
d
idge R
High R
r
dD
Pro
vi
den
H
ut
n
st
il
r
lD
de
Ol
ng
Ct
lant
atio
n
Sa
rd
is
Gl
en
Dr
Dr
233
St
rat
for
n
l Rd
L
de
e
em
Dr
Fawn H
il
on
St
Ro
y
ur
xb
n
yL
h
us
Br
113
Tilley
Foxfire Rd
Rd
Ct
r
D
eld
i
f
d
Re
ill
Arborh
r
R
ation
Plant
d
Whi
tef
Briar Rid
ge Dr
Bridle B
rook Wy
Rosegate
Ln
ow
Morr
is
Ox
b
227
Rd
Ln
tte
Bu
n
ur
h
rC
217
s Rd
Crew
t
cen
s
e
Cr
Ln
Ln
riars
Ln
y
ip P
h
Matthews Township Py
s
n
t
t
S
ow
s
T
i
S
Lo
s
s
ew
h
me
t
t
A
a
M
N
W
r
Ch
D
n
ar
W
ri o
les
a
J
r
M
oh
Rd
St
D
hews-Mint Hill
n
n
tt
a
M
o
t
St
ver
Tre
t
S Ames S
St
Jefferson
Sa
ont St
die
S Freem
E
Dr
Ch
ar
r
les
tD
Ken
St
kD
n
a
yb
Old
Bar
nR
d
Galty Ln
Tr
ai
lR
id
ge
ve
Co
r
nde
Ga
ds
h ir
eD
r
lle
Ho
n
Bell L
Blue
Cedar Bird Ln
Ln
r
Till
ot
Hins
on D
Ct
Cameo
ge Rd
Berry Rid
llow Rd Pro
vide
Brook Ho
nce
Glen
Rd
ce P
n
yL n
b
s
yL
rn
b
o
s
Th
er
m
So
Quill Ln
Sabot Ln
Hu
nti
96
n
ws L
o
l
l
e
B
Drayton Hall L
n
RKd
e
no
e
x
ck
Av
M
e
Ch
Sar
orth
dis Rd N
ine
Dr
Sa
rd
is
Rd
Lorr
a
Rd
l
rfie
o
b
Ar
xa n
Iverl
eigh
Tl
Grier Farm L
n
I-485 R
a
I-48
Rd
ck L n
91
Dr
Ale
Adria
all Rd
Kuykend
Mckee Rd
Ra
t
at
ws
e
h
Kilmo
na
y Rd
Valle
ry Ln
-M
ille
e
sid
e
k
La
l
yP
b
m
He
r
eD
d
ea
n
km
a
by L
n
O
a
l
A
n
Pi
118
r
ir D
a
l
C
Ln
Rd
ns
Lawki
n
erto
b
m
Ki
Fairhill Pl
Dr
is
103
Pl
n
to
d
le
l
er R
Co lexand
A
an
D
Sp
r in
gs
Lega
cy Cr
Chevis Ct
Dr
Chase
y
b
r
a
D
Chasewater Dr
nt
Tus
k
ou
M
Row Ln
Fairway
n
on L
s
i
l
l
A
Ma
ri
nd L n
y
Winsla
incy W
u
Q
y
r
Hen
O u t er H
Sage
Ln
C re
st B
Bos
ham
Be
ve
ord Ln
Pensf
Fairchild Ln
Oak Pond Cr
oix
Ln
Ln
re
er
Pi
St
Ln
ark
p
r
Dee
Dr
orn
h
t
e
t
Whi
90
ff D
r
St C
r
Win
dbl
u
68
Lynbridge Dr
Shallo
wood
Smokerise Hill Dr
o
Will
oin
wP
flo
k Ln
Cr
ow
Candlew
yc
Heathgate Rd
We
st
Cactus Valley Rd
Inner H
y
nia
o
l
Co
Wat
er R
Pl
R
ide
119
Ki
r ks
Pr
ov
Rd
Wedge C
t
o
R
g
in
d
un
r
W I-485
Chilvary Dr
Old
Pr
r
ne
w
to
rk
o
Y
er
D
Woodf
ox D
s Rd
Red
Go
rha
ea
on-r
B
Dr
-rea
n
o
B
Haddonfi
eld
ce C
Roy
op
Av
irh
Fa
s on
r
ge D
d
i
rR
dso
n
i
W
k Dr
Grand Oa
Ducksbill Dr
Ln
m
r
Fa
Bob
rks
hou Bay Tree Wy
a
P
se D
r
Duckhorn Dr
d
Rd
ic
isw
h
C
131
co t
tR
in
W
ru
dy
La
nc
sh
w
atthe
M
e
l
l
i
Pinev
Rd
d
d
oo ywin
tw
in Ga
l
F
Ln
Dr
Ha
rdi
so
nR
70
69
n Dr
Tru
s
Dr
Pond
k
ee
r
C
121
C
t
k
Lin
rn
ynto
Wess
Rd
Pl
ley
n
r
Da
ea
r
kD
n
a
b
n
Fer
n
to
t
Co
Carso
ns
e
Le
R
chm
Coa
urry
L
pP
l
Old
S
dle
to
ob
u
7
C
Camellia Ln
Sp
in
I-48
5R
r
139
Bl
ak
en
dD
Stoddar
e Ln
Bellevu
Hillingdon Rd
rla
n
I-485 Ra
D
Piper Glen
Ra
I-485
S
ove
r
g
h
Hig
gy
Pl
r
ourse Dr
ton
oD
Ct
der
n
a
l
l
Ca
St
on
ep
at
h
Rd
Kell
r
Be
vin
g
lub
D
bell
Rd
Dr
Dr
d
Loch Ln
Giver
ny
Co
lon
yR
Den
big
h
110
ga
te
Mon
ti
Hatton Ct
Oakthorpe Dr
St
on
eb
r
Houston Ridge Rd iar D
144
Elmsto
ne
Dr
aven
Ln
Megwo
od
Endh
Dr
Ln
orn
c
i
r
Dr Society St
Cap
ar k
P
n
o
r
Allys
Maplehurst D
r
Eldon D
Lisha Ln
Dr
Hazelview
ck
Ro
93
Ln
Dr
W
oo
dle
igh
Oa
ks
226
Ct
ord
f
d
a
Bro
Lea
f Ar
bor
L
Ln
Brem
oor
St
oc
Kr ktie
on
R
os d
Pl
73
ot Rd
Wingedfo
Carmel Vis
ta
low
Wil
Gu Rd
nn We
st
i so
n
Ln
vid
e
nc
e
av
en
Tori
ngd
on W
y
En
dh
t
idg
eD
r
n
lL
e
c
r
Ma
Rd
to n
g
n
i
ann
dR
iel
s
eagle
Glen
6
Ln
Cotillion Av
l
tead P
s
h
t
a
e
H
Ln
Quail Hunt
d
wR
e
i
V
il
Cr
Qua
ood
w
d
Win
el F
ores
t Dr
Vlo B
si D
r
Sharon Rd
ohn
St J
agle
s Rd
te Ln
Ivyga
Poun
d
ney
Dela
t
th S
e
b
r
i
Bla
e
stl
a
C
al
y
Ro
Copper M
ountain Bv
ce
New Providen
2
c
cifi
a
P
o
Ech
Dr
Carm
Dr
r
dD
n
ry L
a
sem
Ro
75
Glen
e
erf
88
rt
Po
Wy
D
oke
n
Meadow
ridge Dr
Little Av
n
Ega
nJ
Joh
She
rbro
n
eL
s
r
o
kh
c
a
Bl
s Ea
gle L
n
Deer Spring Ln
m
Ca
o
er
r
dD
92
oo
W
n
Arbor Pointe Dr
Dryden Ln
Rd
Bramwyck Dr
Riverben
d
As
ht
o
Br
oo
kfi
el
t
City of Charlotte - Council District 7
Chandworth Rd
n
Ja
st L
m
e
r
es
c
h
t
u
Ja
o
S
ck
Ln
Pomerol Ln
l
P
n
io
Kilchurn
St Emil
C
Innes C t
Winghurst Dr
t
n
Valley L
Hawick
Providence Rd West
n
e Ct
i
kL
p
s
l
a
Go
ro
ve
l
i
S
Ln
C
t
Palli
sers
T
Park
Cross r
Fox
ing D
hal
r
lD
r
Kenlau
ren Tr
ick
w
r
Roun
dabo
ut Ln
Hope
crest
Dr
Dr
n
o
nt
e
ad
Br
n Rd
Hopeto
adow Ln
e
M
il
a
u
Q
n
ge
r
Be n
L
rg
u
b
le
d
i
n
He
ry L
r
e
nb
Tur
Cr
Lilly
76
Rd
Mill
a
ne
o
G
d
yR
a
w
ew Ln
Miles
1
EH
Lance Dr
3
Rd
r
vi
Bridge
0.5
aD
77
Kin
D
reek
C
s
g
Old Hebr
on
d
Dr ster
c
i
t
a
las anc
o
L
h
Sc
n
Mill L
s
r
e
My
Hy
City Council District Boundaries shown on this map
were adopted on June 13, 2011 and will be in effect July1, 2011.
Sh
ort
e
ov
ghouse B
v
ho
c
E
C
Rd
Pineville
Rock Hill-
So
ern
h
t
u
v
d
dR
B
op
Lo
r
Fo
s
n
tio
a
N
N I - 77 E
xit 2 Ra
I-4
85
F
o
re
s
Fo
r
e
st P
o
i
n
tC
r
Sof
tw
i
n
dD
Win
r
d
s
ong
Dr
H
Co ill S
n t
e
Av
I-7
7
Kermit St
Rd
Ln
Re
id
od
C
t
er
S
Do
v
Dr
ra
n
fo
rd
n Dr
John
sto
NP
o
l
kS
M
t
o
r
row
Av
St
dR
w oo
s
Ma
rin
e
Dr
G
B
i
sh
op
Bv
Kennys St
Cr
aft
e
r
sL
n
Rd
Crum
p
Rod
n
e
yS
t
Ca
d
i
l
lac
St
Pin
e
v
i
l
le R
d
Sh
on
at
e
a
I-485 Ra I-485 R
E
n
gla
nd
d
De
n
m
ark
R
rd L
a
k
e
sD
r
S
o
u
th B
v
W
a
terf
o
B
u
xt
V
a
lle
y
a
r
o
nb
ro
o
kD
r
Starvall
ey Dr
Thorncli
ff Dr
M
oo
nr
id
ge
g
Dr
Chesley D
r
Dr
Oak
ston
e Pl
Osprey Dr
Blue
Dr
Glen
way
Ct
a
Ly
th
r
Her
on D
Pa
r
k
Vis
t
Jade St
Ar
row
o
Sullivan Ridge Dr
Sharon Hills Rd
Dr
W
Di
xie
H
li ls
Dr
I-485
R
Dr
am
aC
r
C
Ro
ck
Riverbirch Dr
Watercrest Rd
Co
ve
Qu y C
h
a
il H ase
i
ll R Dr
d
Sp
rin
r
Dr
Dr
Park Rd
Sh
Bv
Wa
lsh
Sy
th
e
Ct
Ca
n
e
Ct
C
o
n
lan
C
an
yo
n
Ru
d
o
lph
D
M
e
e
ting
St
Co
Ru
sh
m
or
e
Ea
g
le
G le
n
Park Rd
Ln
sti
ga
n
Nolen Ln
Dr
ade
y
Rd
ar
on
H
o
n
ors
Ct
S
h
illi
n
gt
on
Pl
W
a
y
la
nd
Dr
Joh
nst
o
n
Rd
Rd
e
W
ill
stm
Lan
r
eD
e
l
k
Wil
n
ell L
w
e
l
t
Ket
c
a
s
t
er H
y
Su
t
Ti
lle
Sharon A
cres Rd
nf
G
le
Brigmo
re Dr
r
Dr
ry
Ryder Av
De
e
p
w
ood D
r
Ra
d
n
er L
n
Rally Dr
L
a
n
s
ford
Rd
Mis
ty R
i
d
ge
Ln
Rougem
ont Ln
Hil
Bal
t
u
s
rol L
n
Hig
Green R
ea Rd
ld
O
d
O
l
d
Bel
lR
hv
i
e
wR
d
S
t
o
ne
y
Colony Rd
ence Rd
Old Prov
id
a
l
lA
v
h
e
r
by
D
Ct
Pomerane Pl
C
o
Em
ld
era
d Rd
Fruitlan
r
rD
e
t
s
he st Dr
c
n
i
re
W
lands Ct
a l r ey C
Royal High
y
Ro Ard
Ct
d
Hall
l
l
all R
e
b
H
p
e
Cam
ourn
b
r
D
ch
h
ul
G
is
s
av
Tr
A
r
D
d
ll
vin R
a
r
a
H
M
in
w
ld
Ba
Rd
Ra
Dr
ock
n
n
Ba
Ln
ace
r
T
le
Brid
Rd
Wade A
rdrey
ton
Johns
t Ln
n
Ln
tto
n
k Dr
Treebar
to
Eas
y
G re
R
r
le C
y
o
C
H
er
Rd
es
s
nit
Mck
d
m
ity
n
u
se
ou
m
m
u
S
ub
Cl
h Dr
c
s
r
i
H
n
ton L
New
Dr
a
nd
a
w
Dr
na
t
o
T
es
or
f
e
dg
i
R
r
D
Rd
on
r
r
m
a
o
tt
m
Ta
Bo
w
o
ad
e
M
Pr
d
fie
ld
Hu
n
t
c
liff D
r
l Ln
n
Lake Challis
L
Rd
Rd
C
a
rm
Ca
r
m
el R
d
D
Bl
u
e
bi
rd
Swing L
n
Rd
l
ge
r
Rea R
d
r
Foxrid
ge Rd
Raven
cliff Dr
Ln
Rea R
d
Camilla Dr
Bin
for
d
'
sR
N
id
o
g
eR
ra
's
d
el
R
Headford Rd
Mill
Baker
Bv
t
ling C
Ries
Ln
Lindrick
d
R
yside
a
W
Old
m
Co
Oliv
ia
rk
Pa
d
Lahinch Ct
Ln
eR
us
o
H
ity
n
u
mm r Av
o
C
ere
rt h
d
o
e
N
L
r
t on D
sh
rtru
o
al P
D
el
d
W
a
ke
h
u
rst
R
mo
or
L
a
kes
D
Gly
n
l
Rd
Pa
th
Seton House Ln
F
Har
tmill
C
el
a
n
dP
Pin
Gosfo
rd Pl
Autumn Le
af Ln
Par Co
ve Ln
Four
Mi
Lau
r
e
n
Glen
Ln
r
b
e
rry
ion
t
a
nt
Dr
Rock Dove Ct
P
r
o
v
i
nceto
wne
i ng
D ow
St
Blak
ene
y
P
ark
Ma
Dr
Sa h o n i
l
v
ia S a St
t
Dr
Foxhaven
le
moy
Gar
o Dr
Verdug
r
lm
nE
L
m
Ln
Lan
den
D
a
Pl
ill
xM
r
Lyndon
ville Dr
d Dr
lintg
rove
Strawberry Ln
Dr
ey
Dr
Kni
er
Oa
ks
Ch
i
lh
am
Pl
ghts
woo
Ln
Fo
r
O
ld
D
r
ge
Fa
ri V
al
r
Arboretum
Dr
C
Ch
l
iff
adm
s
o
re D ide
r
D
Ho
lly
w
Furrier Dr
Mornin
g Dale
Rd
Ln
Dr
W
ilb
y
Pl
s
t
Oa
Lo
S
a
rdi
s
Ma
Brackenbury Ln
kR
d
Peve
rell Ln
Gr
ov
e
t ti n
g
r
idg
e
Reverdy Ln
Hickory Hill
Umi Ct
Riv
Fair
w
a
y
Ridge
Rd
Foxfield Ln
rin
g
C
ros
s
Ch
a
Ln
Dr
Ln
Be
n
tri
d
le C r
eek R
d
thu
rD
Ar
El
Kin
g
Fo
ow D
rt R d
rd Ct
e ad
m
l
l
i
t
S
Tom
Sho
y
Tom Short Rd
Ol
y
m
p
i
c
Club D
r
d
Tree R
d
e
t
in
Pa
Ln
Willesden
Kyrene Rd
May 30, 2012
Dr
d
y
Ro
Pin
n
n
Dr
es D
M apl
n
a
D
e
V
alle
y
nw
l
iel R
C
l
u
bD
r
Lyn
dL
oo
Hollybrook Dr
M
D
ard
l
l
a
St
Crestwood Dr
r
Shandon C
M
n
Sp a
n
i
k
oy
Wy
G
le
nn
Sh
Ab
o al
Su
M
b
C
a
n
e
r
y
n
e
y
t
e
i
e
n
kC
W
gd
t
a
l
eD y
r
en
Ed
D
ke
a
L
d
Re
le
ap
ci
e
rak
D
s
Cr
ll C
t
Cr
s
wn
Do
St
l
Tea
eL
ridg
iew
odv
o
W
o
rad
Alva
t
Oakley Av
Sir
an
Fr
nd Dr
Cruden B
ay Wy
Jam
es R
i
c
h
ard
Dr
ey Po
Berkel
Bou
l
w
are
C
S
lk
Po
Providence Rd
Retana Dr
St
Ne
w
e
ll R
d
Sam
r
r
M
iro
Ln
Providence Rd
S Polk
ce P
y Ln
la
na P
i
l
o
r
Ca
Wood V
alle
85
I-4
Sikes Pl
Ln
Vintage
n
a
B
e
eT
r
ee
C
Py
Centrum
Ra
Ct
t
ce L
Dr
Sandpiper
L
a
d
y Gr
a
Dr
t
P
in O
C
ak
Esh
e
r
w
o
od Ln
a
St
el
d
rm
Shadow Creek R
Ca
n
r
ar D
d
e
kC
Par
k Ln
Baybroo
Dr Warwickshir
eL
85
I-4
e
ad
k
c
Blo
fo
Heming
B
South Hall
v
Se
C
illa
n
rry L
Kilbe
Ln
by
d
n
kL
Dr
P
lave
c
n
E
F
ce
n
ide
v
o
r
Pr
D
e
er
m
s
ra
G
st
ore
He
m
Rd
sR
wn
ee
Cr
an
Ln
r
d
Rd
Rd
Av
t
Pl
R
ek
e
r
C
Dr
le
Circ
r
a
Ced
nn
Co
tton
Bra
Dr
Ho
e
r
c
t
no
en
ll C
Ma
d
i
i
yh
ov
r
rr e
P
st
Su
a
E
Dr
s
i
v
Da
A
m
and
a
s
Down
n
tio
Raintree Ln
n
Oaks L
Rd
Rd
L
view
s
t
l
Co
ker
Wal
Brenham Ln
Dr
t Dr
Clarks Wynd
Fair
For
es
n
te
t
Pa
ll
Hi
es
nD
r
dC
hur
ch
tria
Sim
fiel
Eq
u
Rd
Liddington Rd
r
Woodburn T
n
d
Weddington R
Bo
un
t
y
Ct
Do
ia
Br
kC
a
rO
Twelve Oaks Pl
Rd
Dr
y
a
tw
n
Be
ncy
Na
Wi
ls
o
Co
nD
le
r
M
Fall
i
ll R
sL
a
d
k
eD
r
Ct
e
n
Ty
Tresanton Dr
Tr
Cr
Gl
en
St
d
r
ka
um
Pl
e
Alpin
l
c
Pa
M
i
n
de n
lp
Cu
Bv
M
t
sC
r
te
as
n
Hampto
H
o
rn
e
ll P
e
Fiv
ll s
Kno
it D
r
I-485 R
ll
Brookne
tD
Camelo
Pl
y
atio
ord
ns F
Cr
r
lC
a
r
o
alm
gs Dr
Sprin
r
elot D
c
n
a
L
r
utle
B
t
t
Rhe
r
eD
s
u
R
i
se
le
B
r
n
rto
a
h
W
e Rd
Weddington Rd
en
le
i
A
South
D
rd
o
f
er
pe Ln
Ln
N
Old
e
urn
t
Wa
o Ln
h
c
i
l
Jer
Hall P
n
o
t
l
i
M
Ox Winte
r br
bo
o
o
r
ke
o
u
Dr
gh
D
Bu
mb r
l
e
Be
ng
Wi
Bo
ed
S
me
Sum
Dr
Brynwood
Marque
Pl
r
ire D
h
s
d
for
Bed
d
En
Win
idg
dy R
eD
r
Ct
t Dr
T
r
ad
e
Tl
N
y
ad
Sh
k
Oa
E
r in
C
es
ircl
d
st R
e
r
o
hF
Hug
r
ey D
n
d
y
S
y
Ma
Wy
a
r
a
Ke d
R
rd
a
n
Sa
ra
n
ac
Ln
l
rlin P
Clearbro
ok Rd
n St
har
Len
n
wL
ho
Stan
A
s
hle
r
ll D
n
gL
r
u
wb t Dr
Ne
Rd
s
e
e
r
g
ec
id
Vin ock R n Rd
w
eyl
st o
Gr
m
llia
Wi
T
r
ad
e
r sa
tte
Rd
Tl
vie
Oak
y
's W
y
e
ns
He Ct
roy
e
am
Dr
t
nC
Rd
to
w
s
l
o
l
l
r
Co ail Ho
Wy
t
kD
y
n
Qu
i
e
C
l
d
n
om
He
ee
r on
r
A
yG
e
l
d
Ha
Elizabeth Ln
e
Ch
yC
r
ee
k
t
sC
le
Dr
Ju o n e
Rh
Dr
rt
wo
s
s
le
e
istl
h
e
W
dg
i
R
ey
n
o
St
Rd
Laurium
d
Ch
Po
Dr
Ha
m
Garamond Ct
aR
d
fr e
El
ne
urt
o
Dr
C
lle
i
v
Lin
y al
o
R
yB
Iv
y
fW
f
lu
Ct
Ta
p
sto
n
Weymouth Ln
Dr
s
l
Lil
n
d
L
od
n
Ple
Pla
ins
Rd
B
e
or
m
t
il
ak
NI
-48
Fo
st
re
Town
r
r
y
Rd
st
D
rH
u te
O
5
Tank
Dr
136
n
eL
Dr
Fo
re
Streets
Interstate
Parcels
Ln
H
ner
n
I
485
S I- C
pc
cL
n
y
Case
tta Dr
Wi
nt
Lig er W
oo
ht
dD
wo
r
od
Dr
Swee
tgum
Voting Precincts
asa
nt
Hic
yL
kor
C re
sce
nt K
noll
85
-I 4
Ra
215
r
es D
Four Lak
Ann
ecy
D
District 7
District 6
District 5
District 4
District 3
District 2
District 1
Adopted Council Districts
H
a
m
p
ton G
len
d
St
e br o
WH
st Dr
Highland Fore
L
th
ea
Privette R
tC
t
Rebel Dr
n
Maylin L
o
R
e Rd
o
r
n
Mo
d
Brightm
oor Dr
Armadale L
n
P
ill
M
nd
Clu
M bV
c
leo iew L
n
d
St
r
L
ynn
w
x
O
r
Mill
Rd
Well
ey Hill R
Kilkenn
S
u
m
m
Ln
Fullwood
Council
Pl
d
View R
Sharon
ll
is
Sard
Am
Fitzwi
n
iams L
n
yL
ir
C
Dr
od
Wo
dC
e
h
s
h
ken
a
L
bling
Bub
Dr
ce
a
l
P
try
Rd
n
u
n
o
o
n
C
h an
s
n
Gle
G
ol
d
en
H
i
ll R
Old
d
P
o
nd L
n
t
Dr
r
l
stria
u
d
n
I
t
Poplar Knoll Dr
itta
Br
C
ny
Sam Newell Rd
E
S
hn
o
J
St
Mo
F rnin
o
re gwo
s
o
t
m
dD
o
r
e
y
nd
eP
t
e
n
p
oi
de
eP
In
c
n
E
de
n
e
ep
Ind
ew
Rd
r
d
Lan
rk D
ma
Rd
Northeas
t Py
ok
ybro
e
l
l
Va
Rd
tth
Ma
l
hoo
c
sS
E
hn
Jo
nt
D
Bv
e
nc
pe
s
Budget Straw Votes
r
tte
i
R
E
de
In
Ca
mp
u
e
nro
Mo
Ct
y
lle
No
n
Bv
Ri
d
g
eR
d
ce
Fen
tL
Pos
e
nc
e
nd
Dr
Ln
Canmore St
Ln
Ln
Provence
Page 47
Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Evaluation Process
Charlotte Department of Transportation
The Traffic Safety Section within the Charlotte Department of Transportation (CDOT) is responsible for
the compilation and analysis of collisions that occur within the right of way inside the Charlotte city
limits. This data is used to develop projects and programs to address documented crash patterns with
the ultimate goal of reducing collisions throughout the City. With more than 20,000 intersections in the
City and on average 18,000 crashes annually, CDOT has developed several methods to focus efforts on
the most unsafe intersections.
One of the tools is the High Accident Location (HAL) list. The HAL is based on a crash rate which is a
mathematical formula that accounts for total numbers of collisions over a three-year period divided by
the intersection traffic volumes. There are currently 87 ranked intersections on the HAL. Intersections
with a crash rate at 1.10 or higher are included.
Another tool CDOT uses to prioritize safety locations is the Intersection Safety Warrants list. The
locations are selected and prioritized using many crash-related factors, including frequency, rate,
severity, and patterns such as type and time of day. There are more than 480 locations identified on the
Safety Warrants list. CDOT updates the Intersection Safety Warrants list every two years.
Citizens, media, City Council, and staff from other agencies, primarily North Carolina Department of
Transportation (NCDOT) and CMPD, bring forward potential safety concerns. Each request is evaluated
fully using the documented crash data and compared against the HAL and Safety Warrants list to
determine if countermeasures are appropriate.
The locations identified on the HAL, Safety Warrants list, or those identified by citizens or other agencies
are preliminary candidates for safety improvements. The final decision to install countermeasures at a
location depends on the findings of a detailed engineering investigation, which includes a breakdown of
the crash data to evaluate trends and potential patterns over three to five years, sight distance
evaluations, and roadway/site evaluations. Staff also evaluates benefit-to-cost of the countermeasures.
The project rankings are continually evaluated as new potential safety concerns are identified to
maximize the limited funding resources.
Data Source
CDOT’s crash data comes from an electronic database populated by crash reports entered by the CMPD.
CDOT receives the raw data from CMPD and processes the information to locate the crash site and verify
the accuracy of many variables including the crash type. Data reported in this paper is collected within
the City of Charlotte limits. The data is typically current to within 30 – 60 days of the evaluation.
City of Charlotte
Department of Transportation
Traffic Safety Section
Sorted by Rank
ID
Location
Collisions
2012 High Accident Locations
2009
2010
2011
3 Years
Total
Avg. Daily
Traffic
Crash Rate
Rank
Prior Year Rank
Notes
6
1
30
6,200
4.42
1
1
Recent CDOT signalization project
NCDOT spot safety project/ proposed Fall 2012
13108
E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BV & S DAVIDSON ST
23
9902
CAMBRIDGE COMMONS DR & HARRISBURG RD
20
18
16
54
15,000
3.29
2
2
10100
ASHLEY RD & FREEDOM DR & TUCKASEEGEE RD
20
38
33
91
28,700
2.90
3
20
12618
E 5TH ST & N CALDWELL ST
16
10
11
37
14,800
2.28
4
3
4698
LAWING RD & MIRANDA RD & OAKDALE RD & SUNSET RD
5
9
4
18
7,300
2.25
5
8
8847
E SUGAR CREEK RD & N TRYON ST & W SUGAR CREEK RD
54
47
23
124
57,300
1.98
6
6
8181
FREEDOM DR & TODDVILLE RD
11
11
9
31
14,600
1.94
7
49
13600
3RD-4TH CONNECTOR ST & E 4TH ST & N KINGS DR & S KINGS DR
28
36
30
94
45,400
1.89
8
14
11956
E 9TH ST & N COLLEGE ST
4
7
6
17
8,400
1.85
9
10
12038
E 8TH ST & N COLLEGE ST
2
10
6
18
8,900
1.85
10
16
4866
E MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD & N TRYON ST & W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
30
33
26
89
47,300
1.72
11
12
50041
CHARLOTTETOWNE AV & METROPOLITAN AV
15
17
7
39
21,300
1.67
12
18
24904
PINEVILLE-MATTHEWS RD & PROVIDENCE RD
46
35
45
126
71,300
1.61
13
25
13667
E 7TH ST & HAWTHORNE LN
9
15
24
48
27,200
1.61
14
75
13420
E BLAND ST & S TRYON ST & W BLAND ST
12
2
13
27
15,300
1.61
15
55
13763
CENTRAL AV & EASTWAY DR
31
36
34
101
58,200
1.58
16
24
12721
S CHURCH ST & W HILL ST & W JOHN BELK RA
7
4
9
20
11,800
1.55
17
Not Ranked
13343
E 7TH ST & E INDEPENDENCE BV
15
22
17
54
32,000
1.54
18
21
11237
N I-77 EXIT 10B RA & W TRADE ST
12
9
10
31
18,500
1.53
19
46
11262
EASTWAY DR & FRONTENAC AV & SHAMROCK DR
33
30
22
85
51,000
1.52
20
40
7380
REAGAN DR & W SUGAR CREEK RD
28
18
26
72
43,500
1.51
21
52
11979
E 12TH ST & E BROOKSHIRE FR RA & N CALDWELL ST
18
14
10
42
25,500
1.50
22
13
4061
DAVID COX RD & LAKEVIEW RD & OLD STATESVILLE RD
12
7
7
26
16,000
1.48
23
35
13912
CHARLOTTETOWNE AV & E JOHN BELK RA & KENILWORTH AV
25
17
28
70
43,400
1.47
24
43
15253
ALBEMARLE RD & E W T HARRIS BV
68
42
40
150
93,200
1.47
25
22
10622
MULBERRY CHURCH RD & QUEEN CITY DR
11
13
6
30
18,800
1.46
26
23
5919
GIBBON RD & NEVIN RD
7
10
8
25
15,700
1.45
27
61
27388
CONLAN CR & JOHN J DELANEY DR
8
9
14
31
19,800
1.43
28
4
8515
ATANDO AV & STATESVILLE AV
14
24
16
54
34,500
1.43
29
94
11232
BARRINGTON DR & MILTON RD
10
8
3
21
13,500
1.42
30
19
12775
E 4TH ST & S CALDWELL ST
9
15
9
33
21,500
1.40
31
Not Ranked
Estimated ADT
Estimated ADT
Estimated ADT
Estimated ADT
12413
E 6TH ST & N BREVARD ST
5
4
6
15
9,800
1.40
32
50
23328
SLEDGE RD & STEELE CREEK RD
13
12
4
29
19,000
1.39
33
17
14442
CENTRAL AV & N SHARON AMITY RD
36
27
31
94
62,000
1.38
34
36
16506
ELLINGTON ST & N WENDOVER RD
13
8
12
33
21,800
1.38
35
Not Ranked
14431
N COLONIAL AV & RANDOLPH RD & S COLONIAL AV
10
18
13
41
27,500
1.36
36
38
21549
S TRYON ST & SANDY PORTER RD
18
29
21
68
45,700
1.36
37
11
12135
E 7TH ST & N COLLEGE ST
8
10
5
23
15,600
1.35
38
34
Recent CDOT signalization project
3146
MALLARD CREEK RD & ODELL SCHOOL RD
7
8
3
18
12,300
1.34
39
15
Estimated ADT
17273
BILLY GRAHAM PY & S TRYON ST & W WOODLAWN RD
21
20
38
79
54,000
1.34
40
Not Ranked
20422
S TRYON ST & W ARROWOOD RD
27
27
20
74
50,600
1.34
41
72
17450
NATIONS FORD RD & S TRYON ST & YORKMONT RD
15
21
8
44
30,100
1.33
42
90
13531
REMOUNT RD & WEST BV
15
13
8
36
24,800
1.33
43
68
15195
ALBEMARLE RD & FARM POND LN
35
25
25
85
58,800
1.32
44
45
11311
51371
MILTON RD & N SHARON AMITY RD
N TRYON ST_UNIVERSITY POINTE BV
16
10
19
45
31,400
1.31
45
70
9
26
15
50
35,200
1.30
46
Not Ranked
2011 City of Charlotte
Collision Data
Release Date: 7/17/2012
Estimated ADT
Left turn restriction installed 2012
Estimated ADT
12
City of Charlotte
Department of Transportation
Traffic Safety Section
Sorted by Rank
ID
Location
Collisions
2012 High Accident Locations
2009
2010
2011
3 Years
Total
Avg. Daily
Traffic
Crash Rate
Rank
Prior Year Rank
Notes
12809
E 7TH ST & N MCDOWELL ST
17
14
7
38
26,800
1.29
47
33
7195
REAGAN DR & TOM HUNTER RD
6
1
6
13
9,200
1.29
48
Not Ranked
30018
BERKELEY PLACE DR & W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
13
11
13
37
26,300
1.28
49
73
4973
MALLARD CREEK RD & W W T HARRIS BV
27
29
30
86
61,200
1.28
50
Not Ranked
998
CAROWINDS BV & CATAWBA TRACE & CHOATE CR
16
20
5
41
29,400
1.27
51
30
15201
ALBEMARLE RD & LAWYERS RD
25
20
28
73
52,800
1.26
52
64
5266
DOUG MAYES PL & J W CLAY BV
4
7
5
16
11,700
1.25
53
Not Ranked
Estimated ADT
5704
E W T HARRIS BV & N TRYON ST & W W T HARRIS BV
E JOHN BELK RA_S CALDWELL ST
44
42
23
109
79,800
1.25
54
37
Estimated ADT
10
13
14
37
27,200
1.24
55
Not Ranked
14078
EAST BV & SOUTH BV
21
23
18
62
45,600
1.24
56
47
15882
EAST BV & QUEENS RD WEST & S KINGS DR
17
9
6
32
23,800
1.23
57
26
11972
N POPLAR ST & W 5TH ST
4
8
1
13
9,700
1.22
58
29
12958
E 3RD ST & S DAVIDSON ST
10
6
3
19
14,200
1.22
59
96
12695
E TRADE ST & N CALDWELL ST & S CALDWELL ST
11
9
7
27
20,200
1.22
60
74
12611
S CHURCH ST & W STONEWALL ST
7
9
3
19
14,300
1.21
61
44
12265
S CHURCH ST & W 4TH ST
10
3
9
22
16,600
1.21
62
Not Ranked
14091
E 7TH ST & N CASWELL RD & PECAN AV
15
16
10
41
31,000
1.21
63
65
13960
CENTRAL AV & KILBORNE DR & NORLAND RD
10
18
14
42
31,900
1.20
64
53
17151
E INDEPENDENCE BV & IDLEWILD RD
41
35
28
104
79,400
1.20
65
39
12068
N POPLAR ST & S POPLAR ST & W TRADE ST
9
4
7
20
15,300
1.19
66
Not Ranked
13158
7280
N I-85 EXIT 41 RA & W SUGAR CREEK RD
17
16
19
52
39,900
1.19
67
Not Ranked
15287
ALBEMARLE RD & N SHARON AMITY RD
36
27
24
87
67,200
1.18
68
42
18776
SOUTH BV & TYVOLA RD
28
29
29
86
67,500
1.16
69
88
4332
S I-85 RA & W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
21
18
21
60
47,200
1.16
70
Not Ranked
7094
EQUIPMENT DR & W SUGAR CREEK RD
4
9
9
22
17,500
1.15
71
Not Ranked
10162
E SUGAR CREEK RD & THE PLAZA
17
18
18
53
42,200
1.15
72
71
12110
S MINT ST & W 4TH ST
7
0
4
11
8,800
1.14
73
Not Ranked
12779
E TRADE ST & N DAVIDSON ST & S DAVIDSON ST
11
5
7
23
18,500
1.14
74
83
11876
N GRAHAM ST & S GRAHAM ST & W TRADE ST
14
13
7
34
27,400
1.13
75
Not Ranked
9440
BRADFORD DR & EDGEWOOD RD & FREEDOM DR
15
6
10
31
25,000
1.13
76
Not Ranked
12170
S POPLAR ST & W 4TH ST
5
3
5
13
10,500
1.13
77
Not Ranked
12891
E HILL ST & S COLLEGE ST
3
4
11
18
14,600
1.13
78
Not Ranked
11783
N GRAHAM ST & W 5TH ST
17
6
3
26
21,100
1.13
79
54
14183
OLD STEELE CREEK RD & WEST BV
12
3
11
26
21,200
1.12
80
Not Ranked
12076
N CHURCH ST & W 5TH ST
5
3
10
18
14,700
1.12
81
Not Ranked
11639
PARKWOOD AV & PEGRAM ST
9
3
10
22
18,000
1.12
82
84
9791
MATHESON AV & N TRYON ST & W 30TH ST
19
14
12
45
37,000
1.11
83
Not Ranked
21296
E ARROWOOD RD & ENGLAND ST & OLD PINEVILLE RD
9
3
14
26
21,400
1.11
84
Not Ranked
4175
LAKEVIEW RD & STATESVILLE RD
4
8
5
17
14,000
1.11
85
Not Ranked
28255
ARDREY KELL RD & REA RD
15
14
21
50
41,400
1.10
86
Not Ranked
5672
BEATTIES FORD RD & SUNSET RD
16
16
15
47
39,000
1.10
87
41
2011 City of Charlotte
Collision Data
Release Date: 7/17/2012
Estimated ADT
Estimated ADT
Estimated ADT
Estimated ADT
Estimated ADT
Estimated ADT
13
City of Charlotte
Department of Transportation
Traffic Safety Section
Sorted Alphabetically
ID
667
22716
21
161
722
5565
7975
1488
577
326
503
423
1070
1629
10848
909
981
9190
1359
311
5293
1202
4105
4543
345
1533
923
5549
1489
5175
4108
114
5199
825
5715
2356
4432
4071
2073
381
990
1156
495
165
832
700
1281
4242
5611
20
1490
1994
1211
853
2127
1741
23114
1098
250
677
8263
5325
Location Name
3RD-4TH CONNECTOR ST & CHARLOTTETOWNE AV & E 3RD ST
ALBEMARLE RD & CENTRAL AV
ALBEMARLE RD & COPPER CREEK CT & LAKE FOREST RD EAST
ALBEMARLE RD & E W T HARRIS BV
ALBEMARLE RD & FARM POND LN
ALBEMARLE RD & GREENBROOK DR
ALBEMARLE RD & OLDE SAVANNAH RD
ALBEMARLE RD & REDDMAN RD
ALBEMARLE RD & REGAL OAKS DR
ALBEMARLE RD & WINTERHAVEN DR
ALLEGHANY ST & CRISMAN ST
ALLEGHANY ST & FREEDOM DR
ALLEGHANY ST & WILKINSON BV
ALLEN A BROWN RD & BROWNE RD & DEARMON RD
ALLENBROOK DR & FREEDOM DR
ALLISTER DR & E W T HARRIS BV
AMITY POINTE RD & N SHARON AMITY RD
ANN MARIE DR & NATIONS FORD RD
ARBORETUM DR & PINEVILLE-MATTHEWS RD
ARBOR WAY & FAIRVIEW RD
ARCHDALE DR & CHERRYCREST LN
ARCHDALE DR & MONTPELIER RD
ARDSLEY RD & QUEENS RD & QUEENS RD WEST
ARLINGTON AV & S CALDWELL ST & SOUTH BV
ARNOLD DR & CENTRAL AV
ASHLEY RD & JOY ST
ASHLEY RD & TUCKASEEGEE RD
ASHMORE DR & E INDEPENDENCE BV
ATANDO AV & STATESVILLE AV
ATMORE ST & E SUGAR CREEK RD
AUDREY ST & EASTWAY DR
AUSTIN DR & N TRYON ST
BALLANTYNE COMMONS PY & DURANT BV & JOHN J DELANEY DR
BALLANTYNE COMMONS PY & JOHN J DELANEY DR
BALLANTYNE CROSSING AV & JOHNSTON RD
BANNER ELK DR & SUNSET RD
BANNINGTON RD & PINEVILLE-MATTHEWS RD
BARAWAY DR & E W T HARRIS BV
BARCLAY DOWNS DR & BULFINCH RD
BARRINGER DR & REMOUNT RD
BARRINGER DR & S I-77 RA & WEST BV
BARRINGER DR & WEST BV
BARRINGTON DR & MILTON RD
BARTON CREEK DR & N TRYON ST
BAXTER ST & S KINGS DR
BAYBROOK LN & PINEVILLE-MATTHEWS RD
BEAL ST & N WENDOVER RD
BEARWOOD AV & E SUGAR CREEK RD
BEATTIES FORD RD & BOOKER AV & OAKLAWN AV
BEATTIES FORD RD & CATHERINE SIMMONS AV
BEATTIES FORD RD & CELIA AV
BEATTIES FORD RD & CINDY LN & GRIERS GROVE RD
BEATTIES FORD RD & FRENCH ST
BEATTIES FORD RD & GILBERT ST & MONTANA DR
BEATTIES FORD RD & KELLER AV
BEATTIES FORD RD & LASALLE ST
BEATTIES FORD RD & MONTGOMERY GARDENS DR
BEATTIES FORD RD & MT HOLLY-HUNTERSVILLE RD
BEATTIES FORD RD & N I-85 EXIT 37 RA
BEATTIES FORD RD & ROZZELLES FERRY RD & W 5TH ST & W TRADE ST
BEATTIES FORD RD & RUSSELL AV
BEATTIES FORD RD & S I-85 EXIT 37 RA & SIR BAILEY DR
2011 City of Charlotte
Collision Data
Signalized
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
2010 Safety Warrants
Intersection Warrants
Pedestrian and Bike Warrants
5 Year
Frontal Last Year
Last 3 Bike
Ped
Collisions Total
Severity Night Chronic
Bike Alcohol
Impact Increase
Years Chronic Chronic
X
X
87
X
59
X
46
X
274
X
166
X
27
X
13
X
97
X
X
112
X
101
X
14
X
52
X
32
X
20
X
10
X
23
X
16
X
10
X
33
X
11
X
25
X
X
10
X
21
X
24
X
12
X
16
X
X
45
X
36
X
70
X
33
X
25
X
45
X
35
X
52
X
X
27
X
44
X
26
X
12
X
X
25
X
23
X
15
X
13
X
X
X
40
X
X
35
X
15
X
34
X
30
X
11
X
46
X
X
45
X
18
X
42
X
X
44
X
47
X
X
X
28
X
86
X
10
X
21
X
61
X
37
X
17
X
39
Release Date: 7/17/2012
2011 HAL
Rank
22
45
20
29
30
57
17
City of Charlotte
Department of Transportation
Traffic Safety Section
Sorted Alphabetically
ID
382
243
2164
254
1282
907
656
1542
2048
4606
1885
1681
737
23007
8074
25483
1240
802
1216
1241
1653
7856
12343
1762
1751
479
2109
2146
383
10625
1126
232
2241
562
4253
387
501
331
2035
5716
2451
362
890
305
2018
288
579
13
1528
398
47
642
306
194
588
40961
2297
344
1025
1703
2338
2079
Location Name
BEATTIES FORD RD & SUNSET RD
BEATTIES FORD RD & TATE ST
BELMONT AV & N CALDWELL ST & PARKWOOD AV
BELMONT AV & N DAVIDSON ST
BELMONT AV & SEIGLE AV
BELVEDERE AV & THE PLAZA
BENNETT ST & N TRYON ST
BENTLEY PL & EASTWAY DR
BERKELEY PLACE DR & W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
BERRYHILL RD & THRIFT RD & TUCKASEEGEE RD
BEVINGTON PL & REA RD
BILLINGSLEY RD & CONSERVANCY LN & RANDOLPH RD
BILLY GRAHAM PY & MORRIS FIELD DR
BILLY GRAHAM PY & N I-85 EXIT 33 RA
BILLY GRAHAM PY & WESTMONT DR
BLAKENEY GREENS BV & REA RD
BLUE HERON DR & PINEVILLE-MATTHEWS RD
BONLYN DR & E W T HARRIS BV
BONNIE CONE LN & E MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD & MARY ALEXANDER RD
BOYER ST & OLD DOWD RD
BRIAR CREEK RD & CENTRAL AV
BRIAR CREEK RD & E INDEPENDENCE BV
BRICE ST & RUSH AV
BROOK RD & CLEMSON AV & THE PLAZA
BROOKSHIRE BV & HOVIS RD
BROOKSHIRE BV & OAKDALE RD
BROOKSHIRE BV & OLD PLANK RD
BROOKSHIRE BV & PLEASANT GROVE RD
BROWNE RD & EASTFIELD RD
BROWNE RD & HAMPTON PLACE DR
BROWN-GRIER RD & SANDY PORTER RD & W ARROWOOD RD
BUICK DR & CONFERENCE DR & E INDEPENDENCE BV
BUSINESS CENTER DR & LITTLE ROCK RD & QUEEN CITY DR
CALIBRE CROSSING DR & CROSS POINT CR & E INDEPENDENCE BV
CAMBRIDGE COMMONS DR & HARRISBURG RD
CAMP GREENE ST & FREEDOM DR
CAMP GREENE ST & WILKINSON BV
CAMP STEWART RD & HARRISBURG RD
CANTERWOOD DR & ELGYWOOD LN
CARMEL COMMONS BV & CARMEL RD
CARMEL RD & JOHNSTON RD
CAROWINDS BV & CATAWBA TRACE & CHOATE CR
CENTRAL AV & EASTWAY DR
CENTRAL AV & HAWTHORNE LN
CENTRAL AV & IRIS DR
CENTRAL AV & LANDIS AV
CENTRAL AV & MORNINGSIDE DR
CENTRAL AV & N SHARON AMITY RD
CENTRAL AV & PIEDMONT ST
CENTRAL AV & THE PLAZA
CHALLIS FARM RD & PINEVILLE-MATTHEWS RD
CHANCELLOR PARK DR & E W T HARRIS BV
CHARLESTON DR & E INDEPENDENCE BV
CHARLOTTETOWNE AV & E 4TH ST
CHARLOTTETOWNE AV & ELIZABETH AV
CHARLOTTETOWNE AV & METROPOLITAN AV
CHASTAIN PARC DR & MT HOLLY-HUNTERSVILLE RD & PUMP STATION RD
CHEROKEE RD & PROVIDENCE RD
CHEROKEE RD & PROVIDENCE RD
CHIPPENDALE RD & MONROE RD
CHOYCE AV & NATIONS FORD RD & REGENCY EXECUTIVE PY
CHRISTENBURY RD & W SUGAR CREEK RD
2011 City of Charlotte
Collision Data
Signalized
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
2010 Safety Warrants
Intersection Warrants
Pedestrian and Bike Warrants
5 Year
Frontal Last Year
Last 3 Bike
Ped
Collisions Total
Severity Night Chronic
Bike Alcohol
Impact Increase
Years Chronic Chronic
X
116
X
20
X
13
X
X
29
X
17
X
25
X
X
54
X
38
X
42
X
20
X
32
X
34
X
83
X
23
X
22
X
X
31
X
24
X
29
X
25
X
X
38
X
33
X
14
X
3
X
X
26
X
16
X
58
X
X
17
X
19
X
46
X
12
X
39
X
103
X
24
X
X
29
X
X
X
68
X
62
X
26
X
27
X
X
13
X
20
X
73
X
X
70
X
187
X
42
X
10
X
11
X
33
X
X
191
X
10
X
40
X
12
X
80
X
22
X
X
71
X
36
X
X
X
36
X
11
X
68
X
14
X
21
X
16
X
10
Release Date: 7/17/2012
2011 HAL
Rank
87
49
2
51
16
34
12
18
City of Charlotte
Department of Transportation
Traffic Safety Section
Sorted Alphabetically
ID
1823
1232
5956
4196
1471
5442
1086
2419
1553
11012
831
790
2131
2156
24
1503
5051
1020
10734
421
499
1889
1689
1919
490
2325
5144
1527
443
5128
1096
654
1808
163
787
1057
18
247
517
1506
916
1194
1082
1927
393
1333
270
207
820
819
999
1485
1545
698
41
1088
1276
79
5172
620
1102
2382
Location Name
CINDERELLA RD & W SUGAR CREEK RD
CITISIDE DR & EASTWAY DR & WELDON AV
CITY VIEW DR & E INDEPENDENCE BV
CLANTON RD & DONALD ROSS RD & WEST BV
CLANTON RD & N I-77 EXIT 7 RA
CLANTON RD & ST VARDELL LN
CLARK BV & N TRYON ST
CLAUDE FREEMAN DR & W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
CLEARMONT AV & N SHARON AMITY RD & SPANISH QUARTER CR
COLE DR & GLENVILLE AV & SHAMROCK DR
COLONY RD & SHARON VIEW RD
COLVILLE RD & N LAUREL AV & RANDOLPH RD & S LAUREL AV
CONCORDIA AV & N GRAHAM ST
CONLAN CR & JOHN J DELANEY DR
CONWAY AV & SCALEYBARK RD
CORONADO DR & N SHARON AMITY RD
COTILLION AV & SHARON RD
COTTONWOOD ST & N GRAHAM ST & REAGAN DR
COULOAK DR & MT HOLLY-HUNTERSVILLE RD
COVECREEK DR & THE PLAZA
COVEDALE DR & MONROE RD
CRAIG AV & N SHARON AMITY RD
CRAIGWOOD DR & HICKORY GROVE RD
CREEKRIDGE RD & VILLAGE LAKE DR
CROWNPOINT EXECUTIVE DR & KREFELD DR & SARDIS RD NORTH
DAVID COX RD & LAKEVIEW RD & OLD STATESVILLE RD
DILWORTH RD EAST & EAST BV
DINADAN DR & NATIONS FORD RD
DOGWOOD PL & HICKORY GROVE RD
DOUG MAYES PL & J W CLAY BV
DOWNS RD & E WESTINGHOUSE BV
DUNN AV & MONROE RD
E 11TH ST & E BROOKSHIRE FR RA & N DAVIDSON ST
E 11TH ST & N COLLEGE ST
E 11TH ST & N TRYON ST & W 11TH ST
E 12TH ST & E BROOKSHIRE FR RA & N CALDWELL ST
E 12TH ST & N BREVARD ST
E 12TH ST & N COLLEGE ST
E 18TH ST & N DAVIDSON ST
E 28TH ST & N TRYON ST & W 28TH ST
E 36TH ST & THE PLAZA
E 3RD ST & E JOHN BELK RA
E 3RD ST & PROVIDENCE RD & S CASWELL RD
E 3RD ST & S CALDWELL ST
E 3RD ST & S COLLEGE ST
E 3RD ST & S DAVIDSON ST
E 3RD ST & S KINGS DR
E 3RD ST & S MCDOWELL ST
E 3RD ST & S TORRENCE ST
E 3RD ST & S TRYON ST & W 3RD ST
E 4TH ST & E JOHN BELK RA
E 4TH ST & HAWTHORNE LN & QUEENS RD
E 4TH ST & S CALDWELL ST
E 4TH ST & S COLLEGE ST
E 4TH ST & S DAVIDSON ST
E 4TH ST & S MCDOWELL ST
E 4TH ST & S TRYON ST & W 4TH ST
E 5TH ST & N CALDWELL ST
E 5TH ST & N DAVIDSON ST
E 5TH ST & N MCDOWELL ST
E 5TH ST & N TRYON ST & W 5TH ST
E 6TH ST & N BREVARD ST
2011 City of Charlotte
Collision Data
Signalized
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
2010 Safety Warrants
Intersection Warrants
Pedestrian and Bike Warrants
5 Year
Frontal Last Year
Last 3 Bike
Ped
Collisions Total
Severity Night Chronic
Bike Alcohol
Impact Increase
Years Chronic Chronic
X
X
31
X
33
X
X
44
X
37
X
25
X
20
X
X
X
X
36
X
43
X
37
X
13
X
X
31
X
30
X
10
X
52
X
13
X
10
X
10
X
44
X
X
X
30
X
X
24
X
X
32
X
16
X
10
X
13
X
16
X
50
X
31
X
15
X
15
X
26
X
27
X
20
X
37
X
59
X
X
40
X
78
X
18
X
39
X
17
X
36
X
36
X
X
39
X
50
X
48
X
30
X
37
X
73
X
X
63
X
35
X
63
X
X
43
X
X
46
X
40
X
41
X
17
X
X
59
X
51
X
X
52
X
X
26
X
30
X
35
X
35
Release Date: 7/17/2012
2011 HAL
Rank
28
23
53
69
22
59
31
4
32
19
City of Charlotte
Department of Transportation
Traffic Safety Section
Sorted Alphabetically
ID
1714
508
1353
1641
1015
731
1486
1728
4525
670
7
587
1059
1549
450
2032
8267
14186
455
5422
1076
901
23228
23692
7927
1242
23137
769
6050
2107
1695
58
801
1018
1091
117
1053
2433
828
498
328
641
1178
8362
5944
366
2049
7952
1303
316
712
734
9077
5385
4325
197
5108
255
19811
576
746
1200
Location Name
E 6TH ST & N COLLEGE ST
E 6TH ST & N MCDOWELL ST
E 7TH ST & E INDEPENDENCE BV
E 7TH ST & N BREVARD ST
E 7TH ST & N MCDOWELL ST
E 7TH ST & N TRYON ST & W 7TH ST
E 8TH ST & HAWTHORNE LN
E 8TH ST & N COLLEGE ST
E 9TH ST & N BREVARD ST
E 9TH ST & N COLLEGE ST
E ARROWHEAD DR & N TRYON ST & W ARROWHEAD DR
E BLAND ST & S TRYON ST & W BLAND ST
E CARSON BV & S TRYON ST & W CARSON BV
E HEBRON ST & NATIONS FORD RD & W HEBRON ST
E HEBRON ST & SOUTH BV
E HILL ST & S TRYON ST & W HILL ST
E INDEPENDENCE BV & EASTWAY DR RA
E INDEPENDENCE BV & HAWTHORNE LN
E INDEPENDENCE BV & IDLEWILD RD
E INDEPENDENCE BV & N WENDOVER RD RA
E INDEPENDENCE BV & SHARON FOREST DR
E INDEPENDENCE BV & WALLACE RD
E MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD & JOHN KIRK DR
E MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD & UNIVERSITY CITY BV
E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BV & S DAVIDSON ST
E MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BV & S TRYON ST & W MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BV
E MCCULLOUGH DR & E W T HARRIS BV
E MCCULLOUGH DR & MCCULLOUGH DR & N TRYON ST
E MOREHEAD ST & MYRTLE AV & ROYAL CT
E STONEWALL ST & S COLLEGE ST
E STONEWALL ST & S MCDOWELL ST
E SUGAR CREEK RD & EASTWAY DR & PURSER DR
E SUGAR CREEK RD & GREENSBORO ST
E SUGAR CREEK RD & N DAVIDSON ST
E SUGAR CREEK RD & REDWOOD AV
E SUGAR CREEK RD & THE PLAZA
E TRADE ST & ELIZABETH AV & N MCDOWELL ST & S MCDOWELL ST
E TRADE ST & N CALDWELL ST & S CALDWELL ST
E TRADE ST & N COLLEGE ST & S COLLEGE ST
E TRADE ST & N DAVIDSON ST & S DAVIDSON ST
E TREMONT AV & SOUTH BV
E W T HARRIS BV & IDLEWILD RD NORTH
E W T HARRIS BV & KIMMERLY GLEN LN & SUSAN DR
E W T HARRIS BV & NINA DR
E W T HARRIS BV & OLD CONCORD RD
E W T HARRIS BV & ROSE HEATHER CT & UNIVERSITY RIDGE DR
E W T HARRIS BV & SNOW LN
E W T HARRIS BV & UNIVERSITY CITY BV
E WESTINGHOUSE BV & NATIONS FORD RD & WESTINGHOUSE BV
E WOODLAWN RD & MURRAYHILL RD
E WOODLAWN RD & RUNNYMEDE LN & SELWYN AV
E WOODLAWN RD & SCALEYBARK RD
EAGLES LANDING DR & FREEDOM DR
EAST BARDEN RD & PROVIDENCE RD
EAST BV & FLORAL AV
EAST BV & KENILWORTH AV
EAST BV & PARK RD
EAST BV & SOUTH BV
EASTFIELD RD & HIGHLAND CREEK PY
EASTFIELD RD & PROSPERITY CHURCH RD
EASTWAY DR & FRONTENAC AV & SHAMROCK DR
EASTWAY DR & MEDFORD DR
2011 City of Charlotte
Collision Data
Signalized
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
2010 Safety Warrants
Intersection Warrants
Pedestrian and Bike Warrants
5 Year
Frontal Last Year
Last 3 Bike
Ped
Collisions Total
Severity Night Chronic
Bike Alcohol
Impact Increase
Years Chronic Chronic
X
40
X
37
X
97
X
43
X
X
74
X
35
X
10
X
35
X
13
X
X
44
X
47
X
33
X
14
X
29
X
64
X
X
16
X
20
X
18
X
227
X
34
X
40
X
54
X
23
X
83
X
X
X
56
X
13
X
35
X
66
X
14
X
56
X
48
X
44
X
35
X
55
X
10
X
107
X
X
64
X
51
X
X
79
X
X
37
X
46
X
29
X
40
X
11
X
35
X
40
X
26
X
45
X
X
31
X
35
X
51
X
39
X
11
X
14
X
10
X
58
X
15
X
102
X
10
X
29
X
149
X
30
Release Date: 7/17/2012
2011 HAL
Rank
18
10
9
15
65
1
72
60
74
56
20
20
City of Charlotte
Department of Transportation
Traffic Safety Section
Sorted Alphabetically
ID
616
5466
6425
446
210
1631
315
4235
1989
908
2148
2279
12770
2094
23470
17699
1030
1456
5167
180
199
25
22674
1244
546
1078
1793
811
233
720
5280
1514
2231
7953
1283
2374
869
8151
136
5110
952
953
1397
956
1612
5875
160
1364
8053
1754
7904
1147
2144
8090
19207
1845
5849
550
5591
2306
1319
899
Location Name
EASTWAY DR & THE PLAZA
EDGEWOOD RD & QUEEN CITY DR & TUCKASEEGEE RD
ELGYWOOD LN & TOM HUNTER RD
ELIZABETH AV & N KINGS DR
ELLINGTON ST & N WENDOVER RD
ELMIN ST & MORNING DR & WEST BV
ENFIELD RD & KILBORNE DR
EPRI DR & W W T HARRIS BV & WACHOVIA DR
EQUIPMENT DR & W SUGAR CREEK RD
ERWIN RD & STEELE CREEK RD
EXIT 61 JOHNSTON RD INNER RA & JOHNSTON RD
EXIT 9 WILKINSON BV & TUCKASEEGEE RD & WILKINSON BV
FAIRES FARM RD & KATHERINE KIKER RD
FAIRVIEW RD & PARK RD
FAIRVIEW RD & SOUTH PARK DR
FALLS BRANCH LN & MT HOLLY-HUNTERSVILLE RD
FARMHURST DR & FOREST POINT BV & NATIONS FORD RD
FINCHLEY DR & SHAMROCK DR
FREEDOM DR & PARK FAIRFAX DR
FREEDOM DR & S I-85 HY & S I-85 RA
FREEDOM DR & THRIFTWOOD DR
GALLERIA BV & MONROE RD
GALLERIA VILLAGE DR & SARDIS RD NORTH
GIBBON RD & NEVIN RD
GIBBON RD & OLD STATESVILLE RD
GIBBON RD & W SUGAR CREEK RD
GLENDORA DR & MONROE RD
GOVERNOR HUNT RD & MALLARD CREEK RD
GREENWICH RD & RANDOLPH RD
GREYSON RIDGE DR & HIGH RIDGE RD & PROVIDENCE RD
GRIER RD & NEWELL-HICKORY GROVE RD
GRIER RD & ROCKY RIVER RD
GROVER RD & SOUTH BV
HAMILTON RD & STEELE CREEK RD
HARGROVE AV & MIDLAND AV & WILKINSON BV
HARRI ANN DR & LAWYERS RD
HARRILL ST & PARKWOOD AV
HARRIS HOUSTON RD & PAVILION BV
HARRISBURG RD & PARKTON RD
HAWTHORNE LN & KENNON ST
HAWTHORNE LN & PARK DR
HAWTHORNE LN & PARKWOOD AV
HAWTHORNE LN & SUNNYSIDE AV
HEATHWAY DR & N TRYON ST
HENDERSON CR & OLD STATESVILLE RD
HEYWOOD AV & KEMPTON PL
HIDDEN VALLEY RD & W SUGAR CREEK RD
HILO DR & N TRYON ST
HODGSON RD & RANDOLPH RD & SLOANE SQUARE WY
HOOD RD & PLAZA RD EXT
HOOD RD & ROBINSON CHURCH RD
HOOD RD & ROCKY RIVER RD
HUNTER AV & W SUGAR CREEK RD
HUNTING RIDGE LN & IDLEWILD RD
HUNTINGTON MEADOW LN & STEELE CREEK RD
HUNTSMOOR DR & NATIONS FORD RD
I-485 RA & N TRYON ST
I-485 RA & N TRYON ST
I-485 RA & N TRYON ST
I-485 RA & N TRYON ST
I-485 RA & REA RD
I-485 RA & S TRYON ST
2011 City of Charlotte
Collision Data
Signalized
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
2010 Safety Warrants
Intersection Warrants
Pedestrian and Bike Warrants
5 Year
Frontal Last Year
Last 3 Bike
Ped
Collisions Total
Severity Night Chronic
Bike Alcohol
Impact Increase
Years Chronic Chronic
X
134
X
24
X
10
X
45
X
X
40
X
10
X
11
X
X
X
34
X
X
39
X
34
X
38
X
54
X
X
11
X
26
X
32
X
12
X
22
X
20
X
11
X
20
X
25
X
32
X
19
X
34
X
X
48
X
X
40
X
13
X
21
X
29
X
40
X
22
X
10
X
X
58
X
28
X
27
X
X
X
30
X
16
X
9
X
27
X
15
X
14
X
26
X
10
X
X
X
41
X
10
X
11
X
55
X
27
X
11
X
11
X
X
23
X
18
X
X
10
X
12
X
11
X
25
X
17
X
31
X
12
X
17
X
X
15
X
44
Release Date: 7/17/2012
2011 HAL
Rank
93
35
71
27
95
21
City of Charlotte
Department of Transportation
Traffic Safety Section
Sorted Alphabetically
ID
8034
18749
24973
9248
1110
1499
809
1401
378
90
817
1172
1170
521
216
4426
8035
8140
1968
355
1781
757
2344
2248
436
1064
985
9271
9044
5161
1326
2005
1717
533
645
325
1690
1953
1588
23876
111
755
590
5284
15036
1511
724
334
89
5680
2038
10875
707
24083
372
5512
244
5074
78
4203
1121
227
Location Name
I-485 RA & S TRYON ST
I-485 RA & SOUTH BV
I-485 RA & STEELE CREEK RD
I-77 RA & WESTINGHOUSE BV
I-77 TO W W T HARRIS BV RA SB & W W T HARRIS BV & W W T HARRIS BV TO I-77 RA SB
IBM DR & NEAL RD & VINOY VIEW DR
IDLEBROOK DR & IDLEWILD RD
IDLEWILD RD & OAK DR & WYALONG DR
IDLEWILD RD & PINEY GROVE RD
IDLEWILD RD NORTH & LAWYERS RD
INWOOD DR & SOUTH BV
J M KEYNES DR & N TRYON ST & UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL DR
J W CLAY BV & N TRYON ST
JOHN J DELANEY DR & JOHNSTON RD
JOHN KIRK DR & OLD CONCORD RD
JOHNSTON RD & WALSH BV
JOSH BIRMINGHAM PY & OLD DOWD RD
KEMP ST & N TRYON ST
KILBORNE DR & SUDBURY RD
KIMMERLY GLEN LN & N SHARON AMITY RD
KINGMAN DR & S TRYON ST
LAKE RD & MILHAVEN LN & STATESVILLE RD
LAKEVIEW RD & STATESVILLE RD
LAMBETH DR & N TRYON ST
LASALLE ST & NEWCASTLE ST & NEWLAND RD
LAWING RD & MIRANDA RD & OAKDALE RD & SUNSET RD
LEAKE ST & WEST BV
LEGRANGER RD & W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
LILAC RD & PARK RD
LITTLE ROCK RD & SCOTT FUTRELL DR
LITTLE ROCK RD & TUCKASEEGEE RD
LONGLEAF DR & SOUTH BV
LUCENA ST & MORETZ AV
LUMARKA DR & MONROE RD & THERMAL RD
MALLARD CREEK RD & MEDICAL PLAZA DR
MALLARD CREEK RD & ODELL SCHOOL RD
MALLARD CREEK RD & OLD MALLARD CREEK RD
MALLARD CREEK RD & POLK AND WHITE RD
MALLARD CREEK RD & RIDGE RD
MALLARD GLEN DR & W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
MARVIN RD & N WENDOVER RD
MCDANIEL LN & OLD CONCORD RD
MCLEAN RD & MEADOW VISTA RD & OLD CONCORD RD
MCMAHAN DR & PINEVILLE-MATTHEWS RD
METROMONT INDUSTRIAL BV & REAMES RD
MICHAEL BAKER PL & RUNNYMEDE LN
MINERAL SPRINGS RD & N GRAHAM ST & W SUGAR CREEK RD
MONROE RD & SHADE VALLEY RD
MONROE RD & WASHBURN AV
MOORES CHAPEL RD & OLD MT HOLLY RD
MORETZ AV & N GRAHAM ST & W 28TH ST
MORNINGSTAR PLACE DR & N TRYON ST
MOSS RD & S TRYON ST
MOUNT HOLLY RD & MT HOLLY-HUNTERSVILLE RD
MULBERRY CHURCH RD & QUEEN CITY DR
MULBERRY CHURCH RD & S I-85 EXIT 33 RA
MUSEUM PLAZA & RANDOLPH RD
N CHURCH ST & S CHURCH ST & W TRADE ST
N CHURCH ST & W 5TH ST
N CHURCH ST & W 6TH ST
N COLONIAL AV & RANDOLPH RD & S COLONIAL AV
N DAVIDSON ST & PARKWOOD AV
2011 City of Charlotte
Collision Data
Signalized
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
2010 Safety Warrants
Intersection Warrants
Pedestrian and Bike Warrants
5 Year
Frontal Last Year
Last 3 Bike
Ped
Collisions Total
Severity Night Chronic
Bike Alcohol
Impact Increase
Years Chronic Chronic
X
23
X
18
X
38
X
41
X
36
X
20
X
27
X
13
X
23
X
11
X
29
X
47
X
75
X
76
X
12
X
39
X
26
X
15
X
10
X
25
X
16
X
18
X
X
37
X
24
X
31
X
X
31
X
23
X
10
X
11
X
X
33
X
25
X
43
X
15
X
33
X
22
X
45
X
30
X
12
X
36
X
18
X
X
30
X
16
X
42
X
27
X
13
X
20
X
81
X
16
X
32
X
X
10
X
X
32
X
10
X
X
53
X
30
X
X
57
X
11
X
15
X
49
X
36
X
21
X
68
X
X
35
Release Date: 7/17/2012
2011 HAL
Rank
85
5
39
26
81
36
22
City of Charlotte
Department of Transportation
Traffic Safety Section
Sorted Alphabetically
ID
796
8258
762
783
149
2020
1453
913
1268
1386
1462
5145
7812
922
5767
4128
153
643
5513
75
2364
5483
5057
53893
2051
4515
5600
5446
1650
2043
4053
1021
5545
904
1548
36
2359
4578
1274
1449
9550
56
4191
2397
162
1390
6066
24965
1648
10628
5226
991
6059
1046
1433
1002
2050
48
593
2446
847
23404
Location Name
N GRAHAM ST & NORRIS AV
N GRAHAM ST & ONEIDA RD
N GRAHAM ST & S GRAHAM ST & W TRADE ST
N GRAHAM ST & W 5TH ST
N GRAHAM ST & W 6TH ST
N I-77 EXIT 10B RA & N I-77 EXIT 10C RA & W 5TH ST
N I-77 EXIT 16 RA & REAMES RD & SUNSET RD
N I-77 EXIT 16 RA & SUNSET RD
N I-77 EXIT 3 RA & W ARROWOOD RD
N I-77 EXIT 5 RA & TYVOLA RD
N I-77 EXIT 8 RA & REMOUNT RD & TOOMEY AV
N I-85 RA & W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
N I-85 RA & W W T HARRIS BV
N IRWIN AV & W 5TH ST
N MCDOWELL ST & PARKWOOD AV
N POPLAR ST & W 5TH ST
N SHARON AMITY RD & SHAMROCK DR
N SYCAMORE ST & W 5TH ST
N TRYON ST & PAVILION BV
N TRYON ST & REAGAN DR
N TRYON ST & STETSON DR
N TRYON ST & UNIVERSITY CITY BV
N TRYON ST & UNIVERSITY CITY BV
N TRYON ST & UNIVERSITY POINTE BV
N TRYON ST & W 10TH ST
N TRYON ST & W 23RD ST
NATIONS FORD RD & S I-77 EXIT 4 RA
NATIONS FORD RD & SHORT HILLS DR
NEWLAND RD & STATESVILLE AV
NORTHLAKE CENTRE PY & REAMES RD & W W T HARRIS BV
OAK LEIGH DR & UNIVERSITY CITY BV
OAKDALE RD & OLD PLANK RD
OAKDALE RD & PLEASANT GROVE RD & RADIO RD
OLD CONCORD RD & ORR RD
OLD CONCORD RD & SUTHER RD
OLD PINEVILLE RD & SCALEYBARK RD & SOUTH BV
OLD PROVIDENCE RD & PROVIDENCE RD
OLD PROVIDENCE RD & REA RD
OLD STEELE CREEK RD & W TYVOLA RD
OLD STEELE CREEK RD & WEST BV
ORCHARD CR & S TRYON ST
PARK CEDAR DR & PINEVILLE-MATTHEWS RD
PARK RD & PINEVILLE-MATTHEWS RD
PARK RD & SENECA PL
PARKWOOD AV & PEGRAM ST
PARKWOOD AV & UMSTEAD ST
PEBBLESTONE DR & VILLAGE LAKE DR
PERIMETER PY & W W T HARRIS BV
PLANTATION RD & WEDDINGTON RD
PLAZA WALK DR & THE PLAZA
PROSPERITY CHURCH RD & RIDGE RD
PROVIDENCE COUNTRY CLUB DR & PROVIDENCE RD
PROVIDENCE RD & SHALOM PARK DR
PROVIDENCE RD & STRAWBERRY HILL DR
QUEENS RD & S CASWELL RD
QUEENS RD WEST & WESTFIELD RD
REA RD & WILLIAMS POND LN
REAGAN DR & TOM HUNTER RD
REID AV & WEST BV
REMOUNT RD & TOOMEY AV
REMOUNT RD & WEST BV
RIVERGATE PY & S TRYON ST
2011 City of Charlotte
Collision Data
Signalized
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
2010 Safety Warrants
Intersection Warrants
Pedestrian and Bike Warrants
5 Year
Frontal Last Year
Last 3 Bike
Ped
Collisions Total
Severity Night Chronic
Bike Alcohol
Impact Increase
Years Chronic Chronic
X
23
X
14
X
X
52
X
47
X
69
X
X
37
X
66
X
43
X
9
X
16
X
15
X
50
X
14
X
X
X
26
X
12
X
X
31
X
92
X
16
X
44
X
X
47
X
27
X
15
X
12
X
32
X
9
X
10
X
X
26
X
13
X
17
X
33
X
20
X
20
X
14
X
30
X
25
X
70
X
30
X
28
X
11
X
X
40
X
10
X
36
X
11
X
29
X
60
X
10
X
18
X
31
X
14
X
X
65
X
19
X
21
X
10
X
30
X
14
X
25
X
45
X
25
X
12
X
14
X
66
X
X
60
Release Date: 7/17/2012
2011 HAL
Rank
75
79
28
58
46
80
82
48
43
23
City of Charlotte
Department of Transportation
Traffic Safety Section
Sorted Alphabetically
ID
11442
1191
10
5467
1531
936
1466
4189
222
187
1186
335
5187
8317
166
8690
147
53
1431
1685
268
16564
319
1108
1502
4349
2316
5940
6394
73
360
680
24417
544
477
760
4308
440
1576
Location Name
ROMARE BEARDEN DR & WEST BV
S CHURCH ST & W HILL ST & W JOHN BELK RA
S CHURCH ST & W STONEWALL ST
S I-77 EXIT 10B RA & S I-77 EXIT 10C RA & W 5TH ST
S I-77 EXIT 10B RA & W TRADE ST
S I-77 EXIT 3 RA & W ARROWOOD RD
S I-85 RA & W W T HARRIS BV
S MINT ST & S MINT ST & W SUMMIT AV
S MINT ST & W 3RD ST
S MINT ST & W CARSON BV
S MINT ST & W MOREHEAD ST
S TRYON ST & STEELE CREEK RD
S TRYON ST & TOWNSHIP RD
S TRYON ST & W WOODLAWN RD
S TRYON ST & WEST BV
S TRYON ST & YORK CENTER DR & GENERAL DR
SAM NEELY RD & STEELE CREEK RD
SAM WILSON RD & WILKINSON BV
SARDIS LN & SARDIS RD
SARDIS RD & SARDIS RD NORTH
SELWYN AV & WELLESLEY AV
SENATOR ROYALL DR & W MALLARD CREEK CHURCH RD
SHAMROCK DR & TIPPERARY PL & WILLARD FARROW DR
SHANNONHOUSE DR & THE PLAZA
SHARON RD & SHARON VIEW RD
SHARON RD & SULKIRK RD
SHOPTON RD & STEELE CREEK RD
SLEDGE RD & STEELE CREEK RD
SOFLEY RD & W SUGAR CREEK RD
SOUTH BV & WICKER DR
SOUTH BV & WISTERIA DR
STARHAVEN DR & THE PLAZA
STEELE CREEK RD & STEELECROFT PY
STEELE CREEK RD & WESTINGHOUSE BV
SUTHER RD & UNIVERSITY CITY BV
TECHNOLOGY DR & W W T HARRIS BV
TOM HUNTER RD & WHITE PLAINS RD
W TRADE ST & WESLEY HEIGHTS WY
WEST BV & WILMORE DR
2011 City of Charlotte
Collision Data
Signalized
No
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
No
No
2010 Safety Warrants
Intersection Warrants
Pedestrian and Bike Warrants
5 Year
Frontal Last Year
Last 3 Bike
Ped
Collisions Total
Severity Night Chronic
Bike Alcohol
Impact Increase
Years Chronic Chronic
X
10
X
X
X
26
X
X
44
X
X
16
X
X
28
X
26
X
20
X
15
X
X
18
X
X
11
X
39
X
X
70
X
37
X
35
X
41
X
X
27
X
27
X
27
X
13
X
31
X
18
X
X
40
X
22
X
23
X
28
X
26
X
16
X
X
X
55
X
X
27
X
65
X
76
X
10
X
21
X
37
X
47
X
74
X
15
X
24
X
12
Release Date: 7/17/2012
2011 HAL
Rank
17
61
33
24
MID-BLOCK and UNSIGNALIZED PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS PROCESS
Pedestrian crossings are an important part of the transportation network. CDOT is responsible for
evaluation and prioritization of pedestrian crossing requests. The Pedestrian Crossing Committee (PCC)
is led by CDOT and comprised of many department representatives, including engineers, planners, and
other experienced staff from Traffic Safety, Public Service, Planning & Design, CATS, and Land
Development.
Mid-block and unsignalized pedestrian crossing requests come from citizens, City Council, and staff from
other Departments through a variety of project developments. Each request is evaluated fully to
determine if enhanced pedestrian crossings are appropriate given the land use, roadway design, and
operating speed of the street. Enhanced pedestrian crossings can include warning signs, marked
crosswalks, refuge islands, medians, Hybrid Pedestrian Beacons, or a combination of these traffic control
devices. Staff uses a number of criteria, such as location, traffic volumes, traffic speed, crossing
proximity to an existing signal, and pedestrian volume in the evaluation process. If thresholds are met
regarding the criteria, an Engineering Study is conducted to determine the most appropriate enhanced
pedestrian crossing.
Once a crossing has been approved, it is placed on a list to compete for funding. There is currently no
established funding source devoted to pedestrian crossings. Staff looks for opportunities to partner
with other programs such as Pedestrian and Traffic Safety, Sidewalk, Traffic Calming, Business Corridors,
Area Plans, or road conversions through resurfacing. Since the PCC formed in 2006 and began tracking
crossing requests, staff has evaluated about 200 locations. There are currently 18 approved pedestrian
crossing locations waiting on funding.
Below are several examples of enhanced pedestrian crossings that have been implemented through the
various projects and programs.
Figure 1. Marked Crosswalk, Warning Signs, Refuge Island on Rozzelles Ferry Road
Figure 2. Hybrid Pedestrian Beacon, Marked Crosswalk, Warning Signs on Beatties Ford Road
Figure 3. Pedestrian Refuge Island on Rozzelles Ferry Road
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Transportation & Planning Committee Members
Robert W. Cook, AICP
Planning Program Manager
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Planning Department
February 7, 2013
Mecklenburg-Union Metropolitan Planning Organization
Budget Information
Attached please find information requested at the January 30, 2013 Transportation & Planning Committee
meeting. Included is the following information:
• Financial Report for the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) grant
• Financial Report for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) grant
• FY 2013 revenue MUMPO receives from all voting jurisdictions
• “Review of MPO Procedures: Weighted Voting, Local Match and Member Service
Arrangements” prepared for MUMPO by J.S. Lane Company, LLC
Staff is prepared to discuss the attached information at the February 11, 2013 Transportation & Planning
Committee meeting. If you have questions before the meeting please don’t hesitate to contact me via
email at rwcook@charlottenc.gov or by phone at 704-336-8643.
CHARLOTTE-MECKLENBURG PLANNING DEPARTMENT
www.charlotteplanning.nc.us
600 East Fourth Street
Charlotte, NC 28202-2853
PH: (704)-336-2205
FAX: (704)-336-5123
Mecklenburg-Union Metropolitan Planning Organization
Unified Planning Work Program
Financial Report for FHWA (PL) Grant
FY2013 Grant
(80%)
Description
Personnel/Staff Time
Technology Infrastructure & Software
Contractual Services
Sub Total
Towns & Counties
Grand Totals
FY2013 Local
Match (20%)
FY2013 Budget
616,900.00
14,080.00
461,020.00
154,225.00
3,520.00
115,255.00
771,125.00
17,600.00
576,275.00
1,092,000.00
273,000.00
1,365,000.00
156,000.00
1,248,000.00
39,000.00
312,000.00
195,000.00
1,560,000.00
Financial Report for FTA (5303) Grant
FY2013 Grant
(80%)
Description
Personnel/ Staff Time
Contractural Services
Grand Totals
311,584.00
24,000.00
335,584.00
Revenue for MUMPO FY13
FY2013 NCDOT
Match (10%)
38,948.00
3,000.00
41,948.00
FY13
Dues collected to cover cost of staffing 2 engineers
Charlotte
Cornelius
Davidson
Huntersville
Indian Trail
Matthews
Mecklenburg
Mint Hill
Monroe
Pineville
Stallings
Union
Waxhaw
Weddington
Wesley Chapel
Wingate
Grand Total
$50,994.40
$3,178.00
$3,178.00
$6,355.40
$6,405.00
$6,355.40
$6,355.40
$6,355.40
$12,810.00
$3,178.00
$6,405.00
$12,810.00
$6,405.00
$6,405.00
$6,405.00
$6,405.00
$150,000.00
FY2013 Local
Match (10%)
38,948.00
3,000.00
41,948.00
FY2013 Budget
389,480.00
30,000.00
419,480.00
MECKLENBURG-UNION METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION
Review of MPO Procedures: Weighted Voting, Local Match and Member Service Arrangements
Conducted as Task Order 2012-1 under MPO On-Call Service Agreement
J. S. Lane Company, LLC
1.9.2013
MUMPO – Procedures Review
LOCAL MATCH REQUIREMENTS
l The most common source of MPO funding for local
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY
METHODOLOGY
The Mecklenburg MPO has requested that a
review of how MPOs conduct weighted
voting, provide for local match on MPOfunded projects (when the funds are passed
through from federal and state sources), and
arrangements for the provision of services to
member agencies. The following summary is
a compilation of previous studies and one
additional study conducted for this task.
Since the three questions posed for this study
involve discrete sub-processes within the
MPO, a compilation of studies was used to
provide this preliminary response. The three
studies cited herein are:
A brief summary of the highlights of the
findings and implications to MUMPO is
presented in Figure 1.
The work was conducted under the MPO OnCall Service Agreement with J. S. Lane
Company, LLC as the lead agency and Anne
Morris as a task leader for survey gathering.
Questions about this study may be
addressed to:
J. Scott Lane, Owner & Manager
J. S. Lane Company, LLC
1004 Broyhill Hall Court
Wake Forest, NC, 27587
919.601.9098 / jslanempo@gmail.com
2 | J. S. Lane Company, LLC
Local Match Requirements. AMPO Survey
Results: Local Match (2005 and 2009). This
effort was really two separate studies that
allow some time-series comparisons to see if
the operations of the MPOs studied are
changing with respect to the question of how
local matches are being provided for
federally funded projects.
Weighted Voting Procedures. AMPO Survey
Results: Policy Board Structure (2004) and
Hampton Roads Transportation Planning
Organization (HRTPO) Survey of Best
Practices (2009, Scott Lane/The Louis Berger
Group, under contract to PBS&J, Inc.). These
two studies had different collection
methodologies, with the AMPO study only
considering weighted voting as one of
several issues related to policy board
structures. A third study conducted by the
Center for Urban Transportation Research
(CUTR) in 2010 is also incorporated into the
matches is from local government (70%).
l The local match may come in the form of annual
dues (typically based on population) and/or
individual project assessments.
l The ability and willingness of local governments to
pay a matching amount is challenging due to
economic hardship, poor understanding of what the
MPO provides, and a reduced willingness to share
in the match requirements by state government and
toll authorities.
WEIGHTED VOTING PROCEDURES
l Few MPOs have a weighted voting system but may
have multiple representatives from one agency.
l When MPOs do have a weighted voting scheme, it
is based on population as a rule with every member
agency receiving at least one vote.
l Voluntary weighted votes are invoked very
infrequently.
l Quorum requirements should also be considered
when developing a voting system to ensure that no
one or small group of members can “filibuster” a
proposed vote.
MEMBER SERVICE AGREEMENTS
l Traditional and board meetings were the most
popular way for MPOs to communicate their
constituents, although newsletters, email, and
training opportunities as other options.
l Data collection is a service all 12 surveyed MPOs
provided to their member agencies; other services
included public involvement, meeting facilitation,
traffic modeling and GIS/mapping.
l Non-member agencies are coordinated with on a
regular or occasional basis, but many cited “as
needed” to this question.
l MPOs regularly rely on non-MPO staff to take a
leadership role in various initiatives.
Figure 1. Highlights of the Procedures Research
MUMPO – Procedures Review
discussion of this section, bringing the total
number of resources to three.
Member Service Arrangements. The
primary resource used for this discussion is a
survey of 12 peer MPOs (as determined by
the Consultant Team and the MPO staff), but
is enriched by both the CUTR study as well
as an older AMPO study conducted in 2004
(AMPO Survey Results: Institutional Survey).
Only the original survey conducted for this
study was focused purely on the issue of
service provision; the other two resources
mentioned important aspects of this question
as part of a more comprehensive review of
MPO organization practices.
Each of the three discussion topics is briefly
summarized in a problem statement, and
then followed by a discussion of the state-ofthe-practice as expressed by these studies. In
no instance was every MPO in the country
surveyed, and the number of surveyed MPOs
does not allow a blanket statement about
the most common or best practice, but only
describes how MPOs are engaging certain
practices within the limits of the sample
frame and specific question presented.
ISSUE 1: LOCAL MATCH REQUIREMENTS
When a metropolitan planning organization
uses federal funds – or allows other agencies
to use funds on its behalf – a matching
amount is required as an offset. Typically
these funds are from the FHWA PL104(F) or
FTA 5303 programs, which require a 20%
or 10% local match, respectively.
In 2004, the Association of Metropolitan
Planning Organizations (AMPO) conducted a
survey of 101 MPOs. Three-fourths of the
MPOs surveyed derived revenue from more
than one source; 29.5% derived revenue
from dues paid by member agencies. Of
these, 43% reported that the way that dues
were calculated were based entirely or
partially based on population, the most
common form of allocation. Other variables
used to assess dues included the following:
l Sales, gas, jet fuel, and property taxes
l In proportion to jurisdiction’s share of VMT
l Voting members on board
l Specific needs for the year, based on
projects or federal planning funds
available
l Equally split among entities
l Land area
l Auto registration
l Per hook-up for water and sewer districts
l Flat rate
About 17% of all MPO revenue was derived
from local sources; the remaining 83% was
derived from federal, state or other sources.
3 | J. S. Lane Company, LLC
MUMPO – Procedures Review
Some of these other sources included in-kind
(services), transit authority, match on local
planning assistance program, toll revenues,
and state grants. In at least one case, smaller
jurisdictions did not pay a matching
requirement.
A second survey conducted separately in
2009 by AMPO received 66 responses.
Although questions were similar to that in the
2004 survey, the results were not presented
in an identical way in the 2009 survey that
allows direct comparisons. However, similar
revenue sources were cited, and a similar
number of local-only (29.85%) sources for
matching funds were cited. Again, other
sources of match requirements included toll
revenues, in-kind services, and states. The
2009 survey did not attempt to provide an
average for the amount of budget derived
from local sources. The 2009 survey did
however note a number of MPOS (53.73%)
that cited specific challenges with respect to
collecting local government funding, as
follows.
l Larger projects
l Limitations of smaller jurisdictions
l Budget cutbacks (many)
l General willingness to provide a local
match
4 | J. S. Lane Company, LLC
l FHWA
interpretation that state DOT
salaries cannot be used to match PL104(F)
funds
l Declining toll revenues
l Reduction in state participation
Implications:
In both surveys reviewed, about 70% of the
MPOs responding used local funds (the most
commonly cited source of revenue) to match
federal funding.
Other sources of funding included transit
agencies, states, and other transportation
authorities.
Revenues are frequently assessed as a dues
payment annually, but may also be charged
against specific member services/projects.
The ability and willingness of local
governments to pay a matching amount is
challenging due to economic hardship, poor
understanding of what the MPO provides, and
a reduced willingness to share in the match
requirements by state government and toll
authorities.
MUMPO – Procedures Review
ISSUE 2: WEIGHTED VOTING
The second issue studied was how MPO
policy boards (MPOs are comprised of one
policy and one technical board, although
other committees may provide input in an
advisory capacity) conducted their voting.
Voting rights issues can quickly become
convoluted and contentious, particularly
when associated issues like quorum
requirements and allocations of funds
become involved. MPOs are generally
thought to rely heavily on a per capita
system for determining the weight of voting
authority assigned to each member agency
(for the purposes of this discussion, we are
assuming that all member agencies have at
least one vote, although some agencies may
have be on the board in an ex-officio
capacity). In this instance, weighted voting
does not mean that one agency has more
than one representative at the MPO table;
however, clearly more representation from a
single agency implies that there is an
additional weight accorded that agency. Not
all MPOs employ a weighted voting method,
and some only invoke a weighted vote at the
request of one or more member agencies.
Other MPOs that have voluntary weighted
voting never use it. Finally, other issues such
as the rotation of board seats among a
group of member agencies (e.g., small towns
in a single county) may complicate the voting
picture.
By far the most complete review of MPO
structures was conducted by the Center for
Urban Transportation Research in a 2010
report titled, “Staffing and Administrative
Capacity
of
Metropolitan
Planning
Organizations.” Of the 133 MPOs surveyed
in this study, only 13.5% actually had a
weighted vote capacity, without any
correlation between the size of the MPO and
its propensity to have a weighted vote.
Several MPOs noted that although their
bylaws permitted weighted voting it had
never been invoked. The authors of the CUTR
report note that applying a weighted voting
scheme can be problematic due to assigning
votes to a statewide or regional agency such
as the state DOT or a transit authority. The
report further notes that
“Proper communication from professional
staff, early consideration of board
member concerns, and thorough public
involvement can minimize divisive votes on
the MPO floor. If little or no division
exists, the utility of weighted voting is
minimal.”(page 2-5, CUTR)
When agencies do have weighted voting, it
is nearly always based on population. A
5 | J. S. Lane Company, LLC
MUMPO – Procedures Review
typical situation is that of Metroplan (Little
Rock, AR), where any regular member can
call for a weighted vote on any issue
appearing before the board. When this call
is done, the maximum number of votes goes
from 27 to 111 and an affirmation must
carry 57 votes from at least three member
agencies. The Highway Department and
transit providers are allowed one vote, and
every local government gets one vote
regardless of their population. The measure
had been in place for 18 years as of the
writing of the CUTR report and survey, and
had never been used during that entire
period.
Another MPO practice study was conducted
in 2008 for the Hampton Roads MPO
(PBS&J, Inc.). Of the 43 responding MPOs,
79% (34) did not report having any
weighted voting system (Figure 2). However,
a number of respondents without weighted
voting were quick to point out that a larger
agency may well have more than one
representative on the policy board. While it
should be noted that weighted voting rarely
occurs in minority of MPOs that have the
option, it is equally important to observe that
if every member agency knows that a
weighted vote will favor one or two larger
jurisdictions then there will be a reluctance to
call for the weighted vote by a smaller
6 | J. S. Lane Company, LLC
member agency since the measure might be
seen as futile or even hostile.
There are some unusual but noteworthy
systems for voting. SEMCOG (Detroit, MI)
uses a complex polling system that
simultaneously records (anonymously) both a
weighted and unweighted vote. The Capital
District Transportation Committee (Albany,
NY) does not vote at all: every action is
reached by consensus of the affected parties
(determined by the Chairperson) or the issue
is remanded back to committee.
An older study (2004) conducted by AMPO
noted that 33% of the 130 MPOs surveyed
had weighted representation; but only 15%
had a provision for weighted voting. Of the
latter, 60% used population only to
determine the weights; 10% by population
plus financial contributions; and 30% cited
other variables. Forty percent (40%) of those
with a weighted vote stated that they
always used a weighted vote; 45% said that
the weighted voting system was never used
or used less than once per year. This study
also validated the Capital District
Transportation
Committee
consensus
approach, with 52% of the MPOs surveyed
stating that consensus is either required
(25%) or often used (27%). However, some
MPOs inserted comments that qualified the
definition of “consensus” as being either a
simple majority or being an affirmative vote
of all “affected” parties.
21%
79%
No
Yes
Figure 2. Percent of Surveyed MPOs With/Without
Weighted Voting (PBS&J, Inc., 2008)
MUMPO – Procedures Review
This same research also asked about quorum
requirements, or the number of members that
need to be present to conduct an official
meeting and vote on issues. Interestingly,
although most of the MPOs cited a simple
majority of eligible members being needed
to hold a meeting, several MPOs noted that
fewer – perhaps only 25% – of the total
voting membership needed to be present to
conduct an official meeting. Multi-state
MPOs definitely complicated some of the
quorum rules, such as that presented in the
bylaws of DVRPC (Philadelphia, PA):
no meeting and hence no votes cast. In this
instance, if the quorum requirements are
weighted by population (as is the case with
the Capital Area MPO in North Carolina),
then a large jurisdiction (or small number of
jurisdictions) can “filibuster” a proposed vote
by simply not attending a meeting. As with
weighted voting, such a quorum issue need
never be exercised as long as the threat to
do so is clearly understood by all the
member jurisdictions.
“A quorum of the Executive Committee for
the purpose of transacting business at any
committee meeting shall exist only when
there are present, in person, at least three
members or alternates from each of the
party States including at least two of three
State officials or appointees or their
alternates from each State. No action of
the committee shall be effective or binding
unless a majority of each party State’s
representatives who are present at such
meeting, including at least two of the
three State’s officials or appointees or
their alternates, shall vote in favor
thereof.”
Few MPOs have a weighted voting system;
however, many MPOs have multiple
representatives from one member agency.
Quorum requirements can be as important as
the weighted representation on the policy
board, since without a quorum there can be
Implications:
When MPOs do have a weighted voting
scheme, it is based on population as a rule
with every member agency receiving at least
one vote.
When MPOs do have a voluntary (called)
weighted voting option in place, it is used very
infrequently.
The ability to reach a quorum should also be
considered in the development of voting
rights, since an inappropriately applied
weighted vote to a quorum may result in the
ability of one or a small group of members to
boycott a proposed vote.
7 | J. S. Lane Company, LLC
MUMPO – Procedures Review
l 7 identified training classes / seminars /
ISSUE 3: MEMBER SERVICES
The third and final issue revolved around
how MPOs provided services to their
member
agencies.
To
acquire
this
information, twelve peer MPOs were
contacted and asked to complete a fourquestion survey as a part of this reporting
effort.
Question 1 – How does your MPO interact
with its members?
All 12 MPOs responded to this question
which identified 17 methods of interacting
with members. The number of MPOs that
utilized each method is shown below and in
Figure 3.
l 12 identified board meetings
l 4 identified informal meal meetings
l 11 identified temporary task forces
l 12 identified standing committees
l 8 identified UPWP/ TIP subcommittees
l 10 identified website
l 7 identified phone conference calls
l 4 identified video conferencing
l 2 identified phone polling
l 11 identified email
l 4 identified newsletters
l 9 identified newsletters (digital)
l 9 identified member orientation classes
8 | J. S. Lane Company, LLC
lunch-n-learn
l 2 identified retreats
l 9 identified individual project committees
l 3 identified other methods
Question 2 - How often do non-member
agencies get invited to participate on an
equal level with any of these
opportunities?
Ten responded to this question. Only one
responded that they do this “quarterly” while
four reported this was done “regularly,”
“often,” “occasionally,” or “on occasion as
projects require.” The other five MPOs
reported that “a number of our standing
committees have positions for other
community
interests,
and
those
representatives participate as full members;”
“advisory membership is involved with every
aspect;” “we have five non-member
agencies that are ex-officio members of our
Technical Committee, …several NGOs and
non-profit agencies [on a Citizen Advisory
Committee]…and [non-MPO agencies] on
project steering committees;” [we notify]
“non-member agencies about the different
MPO
meetings
and
studies
to
participate…submit comments;” and “at
board meetings
informal meal meetings
temporary task forces
standing committees
UPWP/ TIP subcommittees
website
phone conference calls
video conferencing
phone polling
email
newsletters
newsletters (digital)
member orientation classes
training classes / seminars / lunch-n-learn
retreats
individual project committees
other methods
0
3
6
9
12
15
Figure 3. How Does Your MPO Interact with Member Agencies?
MUMPO – Procedures Review
standing committee meetings and project
related meeting where public becomes
voting members.”
Question 3 – How often do non-MPO
personnel take a leadership role in
initiatives noted above [in question 2]?
engineering
traffic modeling
public involvement/ outreach
meeting facilitation (neutral person)
meeting facilities
data collecting, management, and/or distribution
partially or wholly funding staff position at different agency
grant preparation
graphic design, GIS/ mapping, and printing
other services
0 3 6 9 12 15
Figure 4. What Services Does Your MPO Provide to Members?
Eleven responded to this question. Only one
responded “none,” while two others
responded “rarely,” and “we have limited
examples where we’ve co-sponsored a
project with non-MPO entities in the past; in
those instances, the leadership is drawn from
the co-sponsors and have on occasion been
led by someone not affiliated with an MPO
member.” The other eight MPOs reported
“regularly;” “as the project requires;”
“depending on the scope of work or studies
non-MPO personnel are encouraged to take
a leadership role in planning activities
sponsored by the MPO;” “committee officers,
sub-committee chairmen, or task for
chairmen, are never MPO staff members;”
“MPO staff never take a leadership role;”
“most committee task forces are chaired by
non-MPO staff;” “we have a citizen oversight
and environmental justice committee and
both require 100% non-MPO involvement
and leadership;” and “often to always.”
Question 4 – How does your MPO provide
member agency support services?
All 12 MPOs responded to this question
which identified 10 types of support services,
including a “don’t provide any services
beyond federal or state requirements.” The
number of MPOs that provided each type of
services is shown below and in Figure 4.
l 5 provided engineering
l 10 provided traffic modeling
l 6 provided public involvement/ outreach
l 6 provided meeting facilitation (neutral
person)
l 8 provided meeting facilities
l 12 provided data collecting, management,
and/or distribution
l 1 provided partially or wholly funding
staff position at different agency
l 5 provided grant preparation
l 9 provided graphic design, GIS/ mapping,
and printing
l 6 provided other services
Engineering assistance – Of the five
providing this service, four provided both inhouse and consultant services and one
provided only in-house services.
Traffic modeling assistance – Of the 10
providing this service, two provided both inhouse and consultant services, six provided
9 | J. S. Lane Company, LLC
MUMPO – Procedures Review
only in-house services, and two provided
only consultant services.
provided this services and it provided only
in-house services.
Public involvement/outreach assistance in
non-MPO events – Of the six providing this
service, three provided both in-house and
consultant services, two provided only inhouse services, and one provided only
consultant services.
Grant preparation assistance – Of the five
providing this service, none provided both inhouse and consultant services, four provided
only in-house services and one provided only
consultant services.
Meeting
facilitation
(neutral
person)
assistance – Of the six MPOs providing this
service, one provided both in-house and
consultant services, three provided only inhouse services, and two provided only
consultant services.
Meeting facilities assistance – Of the eight
providing this service, two provided both,
five provided in-house services, and one
provided only consultant services.
Data collecting, management, and/or
distribution assistance – All 12 of the MPOs
provided this service, six provided both inhouse and consultant services, five provided
in-house only services, and one provided
only consultant services.
Partially or wholly funding staff position at
different agency assistance – Only one MPO
10 | J. S. Lane Company, LLC
Graphic design, GIS / mapping and printing
assistance – Of the nine providing this
service, four provided both in-house and
consultant services, four provided only inhouse services, and one provided only
consultant services.
Other types of assistance – These were
provided by six MPOs that identified seven
other services:
l traffic signal coordination (in-house and
cash for project);
l cooperative purchasing (in-house and cash
for project);
l metropolitan planning funds (PL) used to
conduct local studies with local match (both
in-house and consultant);
l planning assistance (both in-house and
consultant and cash for project and annual
fee);
l technical studies (both in-house and
consultant and cash for project);
l website posting (in-house); and
l translation services (consultant).