Focus On Results Accountability Reporting for the California Community

advertisement
Focus On Results
Accountability
Reporting for the
California Community
Colleges
A Report to the Legislature,
Pursuant to AB 1417
(Pacheco, Stat. 2004, Ch. 581)
California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office
Jack Scott, Chancellor
Patrick Perry, Vice Chancellor
Technology, Research, and Information Systems
March 31, 2012
ARCC 2012 Report: College Level Indicators
Victor Valley College
Victor Valley Community College District
College Performance Indicators
Student Progress and Achievement: Degree/Certificate/Transfer
Table 1.1:
Student Progress and
Achievement Rate
Percentage of first-time students who showed intent to complete and who achieved any
of the following outcomes within six years: Transferred to a four-year college; or earned
an AA/AS; or earned a Certificate (18 units or more); or achieved "Transfer Directed"
status; or achieved "Transfer Prepared" status. (See explanation in Appendix B.)
2003-2004
to 2008-2009
Student Progress
and Achievement Rate
Table 1.1a:
Percent of Students Who
Earned at Least 30 Units
45.5%
Percent of Students Who
Earned at Least 30 Units
Table 1.2:
70.3 %
47.0 %
2004-2005
to 2009-2010
68.9 %
2005-2006
to 2010-2011
69.5 %
Percentage of first-time students with a minimum of six units earned in a Fall term and
who returned and enrolled in the subsequent Fall term anywhere in the system. (See
explanation in Appendix B.)
Fall 2007 to
Fall 2008
Persistence Rate
61.0 %
Chancellor's Office
California Community Colleges
1102 Q Street
43.6 %
2005-2006
to 2010-2011
Percentage of first-time students who showed intent to complete and who earned at least
30 units while in the California Community College System.
(See explanation in Appendix B.)
2003-2004
to 2008-2009
Persistence Rate
2004-2005
to 2009-2010
Sacramento, California 95811-6549 www.cccco.edu
Fall 2008 to
Fall 2009
59.9 %
Fall 2009 to
Fall 2010
61.6 %
Page 698
State of California
ARCC 2012 Report: College Level Indicators
Victor Valley College
Victor Valley Community College District
College Performance Indicators
Student Progress and Achievement: Vocational/Occupational/Workforce Development
Table 1.3:
See explanation in Appendix B.
Annual Successful Course
Completion Rate for
Credit Vocational Courses
2008-2009
Annual Successful Course
Completion Rate for
Vocational Courses
71.5 %
2009-2010
71.2 %
2010-2011
70.2 %
Pre-Collegiate Improvement: Basic Skills, ESL, and Enhanced Noncredit
Table 1.4:
See explanation in Appendix B.
Annual Successful Course
Completion Rate for
Credit Basic Skills Courses
2008-2009
Annual Successful Course
Completion Rate for
Basic Skills Courses
Table 1.5:
2006-2007 to
2008-2009
55.3 %
2007-2008 to 2008-2009 to
2009-2010
2010-2011
ESL Improvement Rate
49.3%
48.7%
42.3%
Basic Skills Improvement Rate
58.2%
54.4%
51.9%
See explanation in Appendix B.
Career Development and
College Preparation (CDCP)
Progress and Achievement Rate
2006-2007 to
2008-2009
CDCP Progress and
Achievement Rate
Chancellor's Office
California Community Colleges
1102 Q Street
52.8 %
2010-2011
See explanation in Appendix B.
Improvement Rates for
ESL and Credit Basic
Skills Courses
Table 1.6:
56.0 %
2009-2010
Sacramento, California 95811-6549 www.cccco.edu
.%
2007-2008 to 2008-2009 to
2009-2010
2010-2011
.%
.%
Page 699
State of California
ARCC 2012 Report: College Level Indicators
Victor Valley College
Victor Valley Community College District
College Profile
Table 1.7:
Annual Unduplicated
Headcount and Full-Time
Equivalent Students (FTES)
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
Annual Unduplicated Headcount
20,831
20,156
18,780
Full-Time Equivalent Students (FTES)
10,027
10,002
10,006
Source: The annual unduplicated headcount data are produced by the Chancellor’s Office,
Management Information System. The FTES data (Resident only) are produced from the
Chancellor’s Office, Fiscal Services 320 Report.
2008-2009
Table 1.8:
Age of Students at Enrollment
2009-2010
2010-2011
19 or less
31.4 %
31.7%
29.8 %
20 - 24
23.7 %
25.8%
28.1 %
25 - 49
37.0 %
34.9%
35.1 %
Over 49
7.7 %
7.4%
6.9 %
Unknown
0.1 %
0.2%
0.1 %
Source: Chancellor's Office, Management Information System
Table 1.9:
2008-2009
Gender of Students
2009-2010
2010-2011
Female
55.6%
56.7%
55.7%
Male
41.9%
41.6%
42.9%
2.5%
1.7%
1.5%
Unknown
Source: Chancellor's Office, Management Information System
Chancellor's Office
California Community Colleges
1102 Q Street
Sacramento, California 95811-6549 www.cccco.edu
Page 700
State of California
ARCC 2012 Report: College Level Indicators
Victor Valley College
Victor Valley Community College District
College Profile
Table 1.10:
Ethnicity of Students
2008-2009
African American
2009-2010
2010-2011
12.4%
13.5%
13.9%
American Indian/Alaskan
Native
1.0%
0.7%
0.5%
Asian
2.4%
2.0%
1.8%
Filipino
1.5%
1.2%
1.0%
Hispanic
32.9%
35.8%
37.9%
Pacific Islander
0.6%
0.4%
0.4%
Two or More Races
0.0%
1.6%
2.6%
Unknown/Non-Respondent
8.4%
6.5%
4.7%
40.8%
38.3%
37.0%
White Non-Hispanic
Source: Chancellor's Office, Management Information System
Chancellor's Office
California Community Colleges
1102 Q Street
Sacramento, California 95811-6549 www.cccco.edu
Page 701
State of California
ARCC 2012 Report: College Level Indicators
Victor Valley College
Victor Valley Community College District
College Peer Grouping
Table 1.11: Peer Grouping
Indicator
College's
Rate
Peer
Group
Peer Group Peer Group
Low
High
Peer
Group
A
Student Progress and
Achievement Rate
47.0
49.9
38.0
60.5
A1
B
Percent of Students Who
Earned at Least 30 Units
69.5
73.3
65.7
81.4
B2
C
Persistence Rate
61.6
69.1
60.4
79.7
C5
D
Annual Successful Course
Completion Rate for Credit
Vocational Courses
70.2
73.3
62.6
81.3
D2
E
Annual Successful Course
Completion Rate for Credit
Basic Skills Courses
55.3
58.5
40.8
70.2
E4
F
Improvement Rate for
Credit Basic Skills Courses
51.9
52.8
25.0
64.2
F4
G
Improvement Rate for
Credit ESL Courses
42.3
48.8
10.1
67.5
G2
Note: Please refer to Appendices A and B for more information on these rates. The technical details of the peer grouping process are
available in Appendix D.
Chancellor's Office
California Community Colleges
1102 Q Street
Sacramento, California 95811-6539
Page 702
www.cccco.edu
State of California
ARCC 2012 Report: College Level Indicators
Victor Valley College
Victor Valley Community College District
College Self-Assessment
Our service area is centered in a transitional suburban region that has experienced severe economic
declines during the last three years:
? Regional median household values declined to $40k less than county average ($160k v. $200k).
? Regional median household income declined to $5k less than county average ($50k v. $55k).
? Regional unemployment is 15%.
Challenges include unprecedented student demand for classes and services, as well as ongoing restrictions
on state funding. Rationed scheduling in 2010-2011 resulted in fewer unduplicated headcounts but with little
negative impact on FTEs production. In comparison with regional demographics, student population
under-represents white non-Hispanics (37% v. 43%) and males (42.9% v. 50%), and over-represents African
Americans (13.9% v. 10%).
ARCC 2012 shows that VVCCD performance has shown growth but continues to be below peers all six
indicators.
1. At 47%, VVCCD increased by 3.4 percentage points over last year on Student Progress and
Achievement (SPAR). Performance is now 2.9 percentage points below the peer group average.
2. VVCCD’s Percentage of Students Who Earned at Least 30 Units is 69.5%, an increase of 0.6
percentage points over the 2009-2010 cohort and 3.8 percentage points below peers.
3. The Persistence Rate for VVCCD increased 1.7 percentage points from last year, but is 7.5 percentage
points below peers.
4. Vocational Course Completion Rate declined 1.0 percentage point and is 3.1 percentage points below
peers.
5. The Basic Skills Successful Course Completion Rate increased by 2.5 percentage points from last year
and is below peers by 3.2 percentage points.
6. Improvement Rates show declines and are below peer performance: Basic Skills Improvement declined
2.5 percentage points and is 0.9 percentage points below peers; ESL Improvement decreased by 6.4
percentage points and is 6.5 percentage points below peers.
Our improvement goals for 2012 were to match or exceed the ARCC peer group averages for all six
indicators. At present, we have not met those targets. The district continues to underperform most notably
on Persistence and key progress achievements such as ESL Improvement and Earned 30+ Units. Gains
made last year on SPAR and course success in Credit Basic Skills and Credit Vocational will continue, as we
identify improvements campus-wide to increase success in credit vocational courses as part of our Perkins
planning efforts. Each CTE program will be required to review and analyze core indicator data, and include
improvement plans in their individual Title IC application for 2012-2013
Through the annual program review and planning process, the division of student services has discussed
ARCC indicators as well as recommendations from the Student Success Task Force Report and, as a result,
formulated its goals and an action plan to improve persistence and student progress overall. In addition,
relevant strategic objectives and priorities will be incorporated into VVC’s Educational Master Plan,
underway at this writing. Progress on all action plans will be monitored throughout deployment using ARCC
indicators, among others, to represent part of the summative view on the overall impact of our collective
efforts on improving institutional performance.
Chancellor's Office
California Community Colleges
1102 Q Street
Sacramento, California 95811-6539
www.cccco.edu
Page
703
State of California
Download