This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
2006
National winter canola
variety trial
Report of Progress 973
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
CONTENTS
2006 NATIONAL WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIAL
Objectives ...................................................................................................................1
Procedures...................................................................................................................1
Growing Conditions....................................................................................................1
Results.........................................................................................................................1
Acknowledgments.......................................................................................................1
RESULTS FROM THE 2006 NATIONAL WINTER CANOLA VARIETY TRIALS
Meridianville, AL, Table 1 .........................................................................................2
Marianna, AR, Table 2................................................................................................3
Griffin, GA, Table 3....................................................................................................4
Starkville, MS, Table 4 ...............................................................................................5
Raleigh, NC, Table 5 ..................................................................................................6
Orange, VA, Table 6...................................................................................................7
Petersburg, VA, Table 7..............................................................................................8
Southeast Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2006, Figure 1....................................9
Belleville, IL, Table 8 ...............................................................................................11
Carbondale, IL, Table 9 ............................................................................................12
Columbia City, IN, Table 10.....................................................................................13
Russellville, KY, Table 11........................................................................................14
East Lansing, MI, Table 12.......................................................................................15
Custar, OH, Table 13 ................................................................................................16
Fremont, OH, Table 14 .............................................................................................17
State College, PA, Table 15......................................................................................18
Midwest Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2006, Figure 2....................................19
Fruita, CO, Table 16 .................................................................................................21
Rocky Ford, CO, Table 17........................................................................................22
Colby, KS, Table 18..................................................................................................23
Hutchinson, KS, Table 19.........................................................................................24
Columbia, MO, Table 20 ..........................................................................................25
Lincoln, NE, Table 21...............................................................................................26
Chickasha, OK, Table 22 ..........................................................................................27
Enid, OK, Table 23 ...................................................................................................28
Lahoma, OK, Table 24..............................................................................................29
Perkins, OK, Table 25...............................................................................................30
Tipton, OK, Table 26 ................................................................................................31
Chillicothe, TX, Table 27 .........................................................................................32
Lingle, WY, Table 28 ...............................................................................................33
Great Plains Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2006, Figure 3 .............................34
Sources of Seed for Entries in the NWCVT, Table 29 .............................................36
Contribution No. 07-187-S from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
i
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
06” represents the actual precipitation. Yields at
many locations in 2005-06 were affected by
drought conditions, especially on the Great
Plains. Severe drought conditions followed by
late spring rainfall resulted in regrowth, further
reducing yields. Percentage of regrowth is
provided where it occurred. Winter conditions
were mild in some locations and colder in
others, resulting in differential winter-kill.
2006 National Winter
Canola Variety Trial
Objectives
The objectives of this trial are to
evaluate winter canola germplasm over a wide
range of environments, to determine where
released varieties and experimental lines are
best adapted, and to increase the visibility of
winter canola across the nation. In recent years,
this trial has increased in the number of
environments and is planted at locations in the
Great Plains, Midwest, Southeast, and the
Pacific Northwest. The wide diversity in
environments has improved our knowledge and
understanding of winter canola germplasm.
Results
Of the trials distributed in 2005-06, 12
locations were lost because of poor stand
establishment or winter-kill. Twenty-eight
locations in 19 states were harvested. Overall
yields were slightly less than in 2005, and
significantly below average in the Great Plains.
Eleven of the 28 locations included at least one
line with yields greater than 3,000 lb/a. Fifteen
of the 28 locations included at least one line
with yields greater than 2,000 lbs/a.
ARC97019, DSV05013, DSV05100, KS3074,
KS3254, and KS9135 are among the top 10
yielding entries common to the Great Plains
and Midwest.
Winter hardiness continues to be an
important trait to consider when selecting a
winter canola cultivar. Winter hardiness has
been improved over the past several years, but
variability still exists for this trait in available
cultivars. Several lines had high average
survival where differential winter-kill occurred,
including KS9124, ‘Plainsman’, KS3074, and
KS2064.
Procedures
The variety trial was distributed to 47
locations in 22 states during the 2005-06
growing season. The trial included 7 hybrids,
11 released varieties, and 18 experimental lines
from eight different breeding programs.
Management guidelines were supplied
to each cooperator, but previous experience in
the different regions was used for final
management decisions. All trials were planted
in small research plots (approximately 100
square feet) and replicated three times. Results
for yield and winter survival at most locations
include two-year and three-year summaries.
Entries are listed in order from highest to
lowest yields.
2005-06 Growing Conditions
Temperature and precipitation data are
plotted at the top of the site-description page
for each location. On the temperature graphs,
the thick black lines represent the long-term
average high and low temperatures (oF) for the
location. The upper thin line represents the
actual daily high temperatures and the lower
thin line represents the actual daily low
temperatures. On the precipitation graph, the
line labeled “normal” represents the long-term
average precipitation, and the line labeled “05-
Acknowledgments
This work was funded in part by the
National Canola Research Program, United
States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative
States Research Program; the Oklahoma
Agricultural Experiment Station; and the
Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station.
Assistant Scientist Cindy La Barge and student
workers John Bergin, Doug Miller, and Amy
Walton assisted with the planting, care, harvest,
and data preparation for these tests.
1
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Meridianville, Alabama
Ernst Cebert, Alabama A&M University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 10/5/2005 at 6 lbs/a in 7-in. rows
Harvested:
6/9/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan 2 oz/a
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
6.5-6.5-6.5 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
100-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Previous crop: Fallow
Soil type:
Decatur silty clay loam
Elevation:
624 ft
Latitude:
34°35N
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
60
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
50
Normal
40
30
20
05-06
10
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 1. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Meridianville, Alabama.
Winter Survival
Yield
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
Virginia
DSV 05102
Wichita
Abilene
DSV 05104
Jetton
KS3254
Casino
KS3074
TCI Exp 983
KS3068
DSV 05103
Kronos
DSV 05100
ARC98015
Sumner
DSV 05101
Baldur
KS3018
KS2064
KS9135
KS2185
ARC98007
ARC97018
Plainsman
KS3350
KS3067
Rasmus
ARC2180-1
VSX-2
ARC97019
KS7436
Ceres
KS9124
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
2300
2260
2079
2023
1934
1924
1874
1861
1846
1766
1751
1747
1727
1727
1714
1685
1672
1670
1622
1590
1528
1458
1394
1372
1275
1240
1231
1211
1111
1098
933
875
741
643
1559
42
NS
lb/ac
1727
-1742
1725
-1643
---------1201
-1524
1310
1241
1465
1066
--1142
--1097
1315
1494
-1030
967
899
1369
---
2226
-2082
1945
-2129
--------------1946
---1599
----1984
-1442
1311
1483
1771
---
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
98
98
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99.9
0.7
NS
%
100
-100
100
-100
---------100
-100
99
99
100
100
--100
--100
100
100
-100
99
100
100
---
100
-100
100
-100
--------------100
---100
----100
-100
99
100
100
---
%
77
79
73
68
73
56
63
85
70
91
70
71
68
60
92
68
83
66
61
73
60
56
66
70
66
68
68
56
76
50
63
48
25
36
67
29
32
50%
Bloom
date
3/28
3/31
3/28
4/1
3/30
4/2
3/31
3/30
4/1
3/28
4/6
3/30
3/30
3/29
3/31
3/27
3/28
3/30
3/29
3/30
3/30
3/29
4/3
3/29
4/5
3/31
4/6
3/28
3/30
4/2
4/5
3/29
3/29
4/5
3/31
3
5
e
e
e
el
e
l
e
e
el
e
l
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
l
e
l
e
l
e
e
l
l
e
e
l
Maturity
Plant
Height
date
6/27
6/28
6/30
6/28
6/26
7/1
6/29
6/30
7/1
6/27
6/28
6/29
6/30
6/27
6/27
6/29
7/1
6/28
7/1
6/29
7/2
6/29
6/28
6/30
6/27
6/26
6/28
7/2
6/11
6/29
7/3
6/30
6/28
7/4
6/29
0.02
NS
in.
37
43
41
39
46
34
41
43
44
41
40
41
43
41
47
39
40
40
41
41
42
36
44
41
43
37
38
36
37
35
37
39
39
35
40
10
6
s
t
t
s
t
s
t
t
t
t
s
t
t
t
t
s
s
s
t
t
t
s
t
t
t
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
Total
Oil
%
8.3
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.3
0.0
3.7
5.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
0.0
3.3
0.0
1.2
86.3
1.9
%
38.9
39.7
40.6
39.0
39.3
39.4
39.5
40.3
39.6
39.8
39.7
40.8
39.4
40.4
40.0
39.4
41.3
41.2
40.1
40.7
41.2
40.1
41.4
40.8
43.3
40.6
40.2
40.7
39.1
41.3
39.3
39.8
40.9
39.5
40.2
1.0
0.9
%
0.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
4.0
3.3
0.0
5.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.3
5.3
5.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
5.0
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.0
0.0
1.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
72.9
1.7
lb/bu
58.3
59.3
59.5
61.5
60.0
59.3
60.2
58.8
60.2
60.2
59.3
59.5
58.2
59.0
60.3
60.2
60.5
60.5
61.0
60.7
60.5
60.2
59.5
60.0
61.3
59.5
59.8
57.2
59.5
59.5
58.8
60.3
59.6
60.1
59.7
1.7
2.1
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data from 2005 and
2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
2
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Marianna, Arkansas
Robert Bacon & Jim Kelly, University of Arkansas
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 10/5/2005 at 7 lbs/a in 7-in. rows
Harvested:
6/12/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan 4 oz/a
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
120-0-0-24 lbs. N-P-K-S fertilizer in the spring
Previous crop: Fallow
Soil type:
Loving silt loam
234 ft
Elevation:
34°45N
Latitude:
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
60
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
50
40
Normal
30
20
05-06
10
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 2. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Marianna, Arkansas.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
DSV 05102
DSV 05104
DSV 05101
KS9135
Baldur
DSV 05103
DSV 05100
Plainsman
Kronos
Ceres
KS3067
KS3254
ARC97019
Casino
KS3074
KS7436
ARC97018
KS3068
KS2064
Rasmus
Wichita
ARC98007
Virginia
VSX-2
TCI Exp 983
Sumner
KS2185
ARC2180-1
KS9124
Jetton
KS3350
Abilene
ARC98015
KS3018
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
3378
2930
2808
2770
2754
2750
2723
2649
2636
2590
2581
2438
2412
2398
2348
2330
2308
2249
2235
2192
2159
2111
2032
2003
1926
1888
1839
1805
1796
1791
1749
1704
1680
1480
2278
18.7
697
lb/ac
--------------------------------------
---3290
---3016
3258
3271
---2831
-3106
---3398
2962
-3207
3259
----2441
3190
-2263
--2966
---
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
Matur- Plant
Fall
50%
Stand Bloom
ity
Height
%
--------------------------------------
date
3/25
3/25
3/29
3/24
3/24
3/26
3/28
3/24
3/24
3/23
3/26
3/29
3/27
3/24
3/25
3/27
3/22
3/24
3/23
3/21
3/27
3/26
3/21
3/24
3/24
3/23
3/25
3/23
3/23
3/27
3/23
3/21
3/23
3/21
3/24
4
NS
date
5/18
5/20
5/21
5/20
5/18
5/20
5/20
5/19
5/19
5/19
5/19
5/21
5/21
5/18
5/20
5/19
5/19
5/20
5/21
5/19
5/20
5/18
5/19
5/20
5/19
5/20
5/18
5/19
5/19
5/19
5/19
5/19
5/21
5/18
5/19
1
NS
in.
--------------------------------------
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
48.4
47.1
46.0
46.9
50.0
47.9
47.0
47.0
50.8
50.1
46.0
45.9
46.8
49.0
44.3
46.1
46.2
45.0
46.7
47.4
45.7
43.9
44.5
46.5
47.8
45.2
44.8
43.3
44.4
46.3
44.6
48.5
44.1
45.3
46.4
3.6
2.8
Total
Oil
%
36.4
37.9
35.6
37.4
37.3
36.4
38.1
36.7
36.6
36.8
37.7
37.2
35.9
36.4
36.5
36.5
35.7
37.4
35.3
35.3
36.3
35.6
35.5
34.6
38.5
36.2
33.3
35.2
35.8
35.2
35.6
35.7
35.7
35.7
36.2
3.9
1.4
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data
from 2005 and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
3
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Griffin, Georgia
Paul Rose, University of Georgia
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/5/2005 at 5 lbs/a in 7-in. rows
Harvested:
6/9/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan
Insecticides:
Pounce
Irrigation:
1 inch at planting
Fertility:
49-98-104 lbs. fertilizer N-P-K in the fall
120-0-0 lbs. fertilizer N-P-K in the spring
Previous crop: Soybean
Soil type:
Pacolet sandy clay loam
Elevation:
234 ft
Latitude:
34°45N
Comments:
60
40
20
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
60
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
50
40
05-06
30
20
Normal
10
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 3. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Griffin, Georgia.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
DSV 05103
DSV 05101
DSV 05100
Virginia
Wichita
TCI Exp 983
ARC97018
KS3067
DSV 05104
Baldur
Casino
Jetton
DSV 05102
Rasmus
Kronos
KS9124
Abilene
KS9135
VSX-2
KS3074
ARC97019
ARC98015
ARC2180-1
KS3254
KS3068
KS2185
KS3350
ARC98007
Plainsman
Sumner
KS2064
KS7436
KS3018
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.10)
2181
1915
1727
1639
1595
1586
1560
1545
1467
1462
1461
1460
1447
1404
1362
1345
1290
1268
1252
1244
1232
1230
1223
1220
1173
1160
1150
1134
1092
1070
981
914
906
776
1337
132
310
lb/ac
---2278
2329
------2155
-1833
1860
1608
1651
1696
2026
---1830
--1895
--1292
1833
1584
1624
-1284
1845
---
---2115
2143
-----1431
2006
-1741
-1490
1550
1487
1963
------1895
--1052
--1530
-1365
1747
---
--------------------------------------
%
---100
100
------100
-100
100
100
100
100
100
---100
--100
--100
100
100
100
-100
100
---
---100
100
-----100
100
-100
-100
100
100
100
------100
--100
--100
-100
100
---
%
--------------------------------------
50% Matur- Plant
Bloom
Height
ity
date
3/31
3/30
3/30
3/28
4/2
3/31
4/2
4/2
3/29
3/29
4/3
3/30
3/31
3/29
4/1
4/1
3/30
4/1
3/28
4/1
3/30
3/30
3/24
4/2
4/2
3/18
4/3
4/3
4/4
3/28
3/30
3/30
3/31
3/31
3/30
2
4
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
e
l
l
l
date
--------------------------------------
in.
51
51
51
47
49
53
53
49
51
51
53
46
54
49
53
47
52
50
49
51
52
56
51
53
47
44
51
52
52
44
53
47
46
46
50
2
NS
Lodg- Shatter- Test
Weight
ing
ing
%
--------------------------------------
%
4.0
3.3
4.0
0.7
3.3
1.7
5.0
1.0
4.7
7.0
3.3
3.3
5.7
5.0
3.3
5.0
5.0
8.3
1.7
3.0
6.7
3.7
8.3
6.7
3.3
3.3
7.0
5.0
4.0
5.0
7.3
7.3
3.3
2.3
4.5
2.2
NS
lb/bu
--------------------------------------
Total
Oil
%
42.5
41.5
42.5
39.0
41.1
43.7
-42.3
41.3
42.2
43.1
40.5
41.5
42.1
41.7
41.6
41.0
43.1
40.7
41.0
41.8
42.4
41.7
41.2
40.8
41.1
41.7
41.4
39.4
40.8
41.4
41.5
39.2
40.3
41.4
0.7
1.7
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data from
2005 and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
4
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Starkville, Mississippi
Brian Baldwin, Mississippi State University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/14/2005 at 5.1 lbs/a in 7-in. rows
Harvested:
5/19/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan 1pt/a
Insecticides:
None
Fertility:
21-0-0-20 lbs. fertilizer N-P-K-S in the fall
0-0-0-65 lbs. fertilizer N-P-K-S in the spring to
reduce soil pH and and free up available P
Previous crop: Sweet corn & watermellon
Soil type:
Sumter silty clay loam
Elevation:
344 ft
33°44N
Latitude:
Comments:
Highly calcareous soils (pH = 8.1) reduced yields.
60
40
20
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
60
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
50
40
05-06
30
Normal
20
10
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 4. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Starkville, Mississippi.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
DSV 05102
ARC97018
Jetton
KS3068
Sumner
Wichita
KS7436
VSX-2
Virginia
TCI Exp 983
DSV 05100
ARC98007
Rasmus
KS3018
KS9135
KS3350
DSV 05103
Kronos
KS2185
ARC98015
DSV 05104
DSV 05101
KS3254
KS2064
Baldur
ARC2180-1
KS9124
KS3074
Plainsman
Abilene
KS3067
Ceres
ARC97019
Casino
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
517
505
485
469
467
450
444
412
402
398
389
383
382
378
337
334
318
317
314
311
309
285
262
250
245
237
213
208
193
179
171
171
145
123
324
51
NS
lb/ac
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
75
80
92
80
80
70
67
80
73
70
90
90
78
85
78
90
72
70
73
92
75
63
83
73
60
83
73
80
67
60
72
57
78
70
76
16
20
%
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
date
3/23 l
3/20 le
3/18 e
3/23 l
3/15 e
3/20 le
3/15 e
3/20 le
3/21 le
3/15 e
3/20 le
3/21 le
3/15 e
3/20 le
3/23 l
3/21 le
3/24 l
3/25 l
3/18 e
3/23 l
3/23 l
3/23 l
3/24 l
3/25 l
3/20 le
3/25 l
3/25 l
3/26 l
3/26 l
3/23 l
3/25 l
3/18 e
3/26 l
3/26 l
3/22
5
6
Matur- Plant
ity
Height
date
136
135
133
135
135
135
136
134
133
132
133
135
135
133
135
135
138
135
133
138
136
136
138
138
138
137
133
133
135
133
137
138
136
136
135
2
NS
in.
36
36
30
35
32
34
35
29
28
35
39
40
34
32
34
35
36
32
26
40
38
34
34
33
36
32
35
31
33
35
35
39
35
36
34
12
7
t
t
s
t
t
s
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
Lodg- Shatter- Moist
ing
ing
ure
%
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
%
11.2
11.5
9.5
11.1
10.4
10.6
12.5
9.9
10.5
8.4
10.6
11.1
10.6
10.3
11.9
11.1
12.5
12.0
9.9
13.2
11.5
11.7
13.9
11.9
10.9
12.1
9.9
10.7
11.6
10.5
11.7
13.6
11.8
12.2
11.3
13.3
2.5
Total
Oil
%
39.0
37.2
36.9
37.5
37.8
38.4
37.9
38.4
37.6
38.6
37.6
37.5
37.4
37.2
36.4
36.6
33.6
37.0
39.1
37.5
35.2
38.7
38.0
38.1
39.0
37.2
36.0
39.2
36.5
36.9
38.2
34.6
38.2
37.7
37.4
5.5
NS
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
5
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Raleigh, North Carolina
Kim Tungate & Amber Moore, North Carolina State University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 10/17/05 at 16.6 lbs/a in 4-in. rows
60
Harvested:
7/1/2006
Pesticides:
Trifluralin
40
Irrigation:
None
20
Fertility:
50-0-20 lbs. fertilizer N-P-K in the fall
bloom
plant
harvest
0
90-0-0-25 lbs. fertilizer N-P-K-S in the spring
7/1
Previous crop:
Fallow
50
Soil type:
Appling
40
Elevation:
331 ft
Latitude:
35°39N
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
30
Normal
20
Comments:
2/1
05-06
10
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 5. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Raleigh, North Carolina
Yield
Line
VSX-2
DSV 05101
ARC98015
ARC97019
KS2185
KS3350
DSV 05100
KS9124
Baldur
Ceres
Rasmus
KS3068
KS3074
Casino
KS3254
DSV 05103
Abilene
ARC2180-1
ARC97018
DSV 05102
DSV 05104
KS9135
Wichita
Jetton
KS3018
KS7436
KS2064
Kronos
ARC98007
Virginia
TCI Exp 983
Sumner
Plainsman
KS3067
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
Winter Survival
2006
2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
--------------------------------------
lb/ac
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
80
75
75
75
73
73
72
72
72
72
72
70
70
70
69
68
68
68
68
67
67
67
67
67
65
63
62
62
60
58
57
48
47
42
66
25
NS
%
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
date
--------------------------------------
*Matur- Plant
ity
Height
%
75
58
50
75
70
53
52
53
78
57
57
73
50
67
72
78
60
73
75
52
50
73
65
52
52
50
55
78
60
55
72
73
52
75
63
33
NS
in.
33
36
33
33
35
31
31
33
36
35
35
31
33
31
31
30
33
33
32
33
33
31
33
31
32
33
33
34
30
33
33
32
34
33
33
10
NS
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
--------------------------------------
Total
Oil
%
38.9
39.4
37.6
37.4
39.8
38.4
36.7
40.1
38.3
38.6
40.9
36.3
38.9
38.0
37.2
37.8
37.8
39.8
38.4
40.3
40.2
38.2
40.8
37.8
36.8
39.4
40.0
37.6
35.2
39.7
38.6
39.0
37.6
-38.6
4.9
NS
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *Maturity was rated as the percent of
the plot fully mature.
6
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Orange, Virginia
David Starner, Virginia Tech University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/26/2005 at 5 lbs/a in 7-in. rows
Harvested:
6/16/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan 2 pt/a
Insecticides:
Capture 2 EC 2.5 oz/a
Fertility:
29-83-0 lbs. fertilizer N-P-K in the fall
60-0-0 lbs. fertilizer N-P-K in the spring
None
Irrigation
Previous crop: Tall Fescue
Soil type:
Davidson clay loam
Elevation:
515 ft
Latitude:
38°13N
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harves t
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
50
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
40
Normal
30
20
05-06
10
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 6. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Orange, Virginia.
Yield
Line
2006
*2yr
Winter Survival
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
50%
Stand Bloom
Maturity
Plant Lodg- Shatter- Test
Weight
ing
Height ing
Total
Oil
lb/ac
%
in.
0-10 date
date
%
%
lb/bu
%
KS3254
3392
--100
--4.7
4/12 l 6/14 l
57 t
--50.9
39.6
Kronos
3321 3933 3669
92
89
82
4.0
4/10
6/13 el
57 t
--50.7
40.0
ARC97019
3320
--97
--5.0
4/9
6/14 l
57 t
--50.4
39.8
DSV 05100
3290
--97
--4.7
4/9
6/14 l
56 t
--50.6
42.6
ARC97018
3274
--95
--6.3
4/8 e 6/14 l
53 t
--50.7
40.6
Wichita
3262 3878 3592
93
90
83
6.3
4/8 e 6/12 el
52
--51.1
39.7
DSV 05103
3228
--98
--4.7
4/10
6/14 l
58 t
--50.9
40.7
KS3074
3203
--98
--4.3
4/10
6/11 el
52
--51.0
41.1
ARC98007
3152
--97
--5.7
4/9
6/14 l
54 t
--50.6
41.6
KS3350
3129
--95
--5.3
4/10
6/13 el
54 t
--50.5
39.9
KS3067
3055
--92
--7.3
4/10
6/13 el
50 s
--50.8
41.7
KS3068
3054
--97
--5.7
4/10
6/12 el
52
--51.0
41.0
Virginia
3039 2841 2742
97
81
73
3.3
4/8 e 6/13 el
49 s
--50.0
40.7
KS9135
3023 3314 3145
98
93
84
4.3
4/11 l 6/14 l
56 t
--50.5
40.7
TCI Exp 983
2991
--95
--5.0
4/8 e 6/14 l
51 s
--50.8
44.3
Sumner
2983 3408
-92
87
-3.7
4/7 e 6/12 el
49 s
--51.2
40.7
DSV 05102
2941
--97
--4.0
4/9
6/13 el
57 t
--51.5
41.2
ARC98015
2925
--95
--6.0
4/10
6/13 el
55 t
--50.7
41.1
Baldur
2925 3859
-87
88
-5.0
4/9
6/14 l
53 t
--50.7
42.2
DSV 05101
2915
--100
--4.7
4/7 e 6/14 l
54 t
--50.7
41.2
Jetton
2912 3461 3346
95
90
84
5.0
4/9
6/13 el
49 s
--50.2
40.0
KS3018
2897 3191
-92
85
-4.7
4/9
6/13 el
52
--51.1
39.8
78
2.7
4/10
6/14 l
56 t
--50.3
39.3
Abilene
2823 3315 3128
100
92
ARC2180-1
2818 3166
-95
91
-6.0
4/7 e 6/13 el
50 s
--49.9
40.7
VSX-2
2756 3289 3005
93
89
74
3.3
4/8 e 6/13 el
46 s
--49.3
40.5
KS2185
2689 3249
-95
89
-6.0
4/6 e 6/12 el
46 s
--51.0
40.5
Casino
2661
-2395
95
-69
4.7
4/11 l 6/14 l
54 t
--50.2
40.6
KS9124
2599 2944 2910
97
89
80
4.3
4/11 l 6/14 l
52
--50.8
40.3
Rasmus
2570 2766 2734
95
89
77
3.3
4/8 e 6/14 l
50 s
--49.8
40.8
KS2064
2562 2997
-90
89
-6.0
4/9
6/12 el
51 s
--50.5
41.6
DSV 05104
2464
--93
--4.0
4/10
6/14 l
57 t
--50.8
42.5
Plainsman
2422 2051 2137
98
87
75
3.0
4/13 l 6/13 el
58 t
--50.6
40.0
KS7436
2419 2941 2914
98
90
83
3.7
4/9
6/15 l
51 s
--50.8
40.2
Ceres
2155 2340 2293
92
82
72
1.3
4/11 l 6/14 l
55 t
--51.1
39.8
Mean
2917 3213 2916
95
89
77
4.6
4/9
6/13
53
--50.6
40.8
CV (%)
11
--6
--29
1.0
0.6
6
--0.7
1.6
LSD (0.05)
524
--NS
--1.8
2
2
5
--0.6
1.6
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data from
2005 and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
7
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Petersburg, Virginia
Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 10/4/2005 at 6 lbs/a in 15-in rows
Harvested:
7/10/2006
Pesticides:
1 pt/a Treflan
Insecticides:
100 mL/a KARATE
Fertility:
100-100-100 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer
None
Irrigation
Previous crop: Fallow
Soil type:
Abell sandy loam
Elevation:
134 ft
Latitude:
37°14N
Comments:
Trial was harvested two weeks late resulting in yield losses to
shattering
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
50
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
40
Normal
30
20
05-06
10
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 7. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Petersburg, Virginia.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
DSV 05102
Virginia
DSV 05101
DSV 05103
DSV 05100
VSX-2
DSV 05104
KS3350
KS9135
ARC2180-1
KS3254
KS3067
KS3074
ARC98015
Abilene
ARC97018
Kronos
KS3068
ARC97019
KS2185
TCI Exp 983
Casino
Baldur
Jetton
KS7436
Rasmus
KS3018
KS9124
Plainsman
ARC98007
Wichita
Sumner
KS2064
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
1947
1881
1858
1709
1673
1494
1141
1092
1032
1007
1005
977
976
930
903
903
899
899
883
873
866
855
841
818
817
807
789
780
761
692
658
651
550
402
1011
26
424
lb/ac
-1739
---1665
--1260
999
----1246
-1103
--1018
--1228
1056
783
1322
1141
893
919
-997
1101
874
851
1172
---
-2471
---2449
--2011
-----1881
-2026
------2057
1457
1994
-1564
1416
-2067
--1396
1837
---
--------------------------------------
%
-100
---100
--100
100
----100
-100
--100
--100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
---
-100
---100
--100
-----100
-100
------100
100
100
-100
100
-100
--100
100
---
Fall
50% Matur- Plant
Height
ity
Stand Bloom
%
--------------------------------------
date
--------------------------------------
date
--------------------------------------
in.
42
33
38
38
39
35
38
37
36
39
37
36
37
42
35
34
35
35
37
33
36
37
35
33
33
35
34
39
40
38
33
32
34
36
36
8
5
t
s
t
t
t
s
t
t
s
t
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
t
t
t
s
s
s
s
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
--------------------------------------
Total
Oil
%
39.5
37.2
39.3
39.6
40.5
37.5
39.6
37.4
37.6
37.3
38.7
38.6
38.6
37.6
36.8
36.6
37.4
38.4
36.5
37.8
42.0
38.2
39.0
37.1
39.4
37.4
37.5
37.6
36.7
37.6
38.5
37.1
37.9
38.8
38.1
1.9
1.5
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data
from 2005 and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
8
Height - inches
Figure 1. Southeast Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2006.
9
Wichita
Jetton
KS2064
KS7436
Baldur
Ceres
Mean
Virginia
Ceres
Abilene
KS2064
KS3067
Wichita
KS3068
KS3018
Rasmus
Sumner
TCI Exp 983
KS3067
Jetton
Virginia
KS2185
Abilene
Kronos
KS9124
Plainsman
Rasmus
Mean
Sumner
VSX-2
VSX-2
KS9124
Casino
TCI Exp 983
KS3350
KS3018
KS7436
KS3074
KS9135
KS9135
DSV 05104
DSV 05103
ARC97019
DSV 05101
KS2185
KS3254
DSV 05101
ARC97018
ARC2180-1
ARC97018
KS3068
ARC2180-1
Baldur
DSV 05103
Casino
ARC98007
DSV 05102
ARC98007
KS3074
ARC97019
Kronos
DSV 05100
KS3254
-6
Plainsman
-4
DSV 05100
-2
DSV 05104
0
KS3350
2
ARC98015
4
ARC98015
6
DSV 05102
Survival - %
Plainsman
KS9124
Ceres
ARC2180-1
KS2064
Mean
KS3018
KS3350
KS2185
ARC98015
ARC98007
ARC97019
Abilene
Sumner
KS7436
Casino
Rasmus
TCI Exp 983
KS3067
KS3068
KS9135
Wichita
KS3074
ARC97018
KS3254
DSV 05104
Jetton
Kronos
Baldur
Virginia
VSX-2
DSV 05101
DSV 05100
DSV 05103
DSV 05102
Yield - lb/a
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
600
400
200
0
-200
-400
9
7
5
3
1
-1
-3
-5
-7
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
3
50% Bloom
1
-1
-3
Plainsman
KS3067
KS3254
ARC97019
KS3068
KS3074
KS9124
Casino
ARC98007
DSV 05103
KS3350
KS9135
Kronos
Ceres
DSV 05104
DSV 05102
DSV 05101
ARC98015
DSV 05100
Wichita
KS2064
Mean
ARC97018
ARC2180-1
Baldur
KS7436
Jetton
VSX-2
Rasmus
KS3018
Virginia
Abilene
TCI Exp 983
Sumner
KS2185
-5
3
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
-0.5
-1
TCI EXP 983
DSV 05100
DSV 05104
Baldur
KS3067
DSV 05102
KS7436
DSV 05101
DSV 05103
KS3074
Casino
Rasmus
ARC98015
Wichita
Sumner
VSX-2
KS3254
Mean
KS9135
KS2185
Jetton
ARC2180-1
Ceres
KS9124
KS3350
ARC98007
Kronos
KS3068
KS2064
Abilene
Virginia
KS3018
ARC97018
ARC97019
Plainsman
Total Oil - %
2.5
Note: Values are averages of the differences
between each cultivar and the mean of
Ceres, Jetton, Plainsman, and Wichita for
yield (lbs/a), winter survival (%), plant height
(inches), 50% bloom date (days), and total
oil content (%). The number of observations
for each trait is represented by the different
color of the bars (as shown at right).
0 to 15
Observations
16-30
Observations
More than 30
Observations
Figure 1. Southeast Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2006 (continued).
10
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Belleville, Illinois
Michael Schmidt & Jim Klein, Southern Illinois University,
Carbondale
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/22/05 at 10 lbs/a in 7.5-in. rows
Harvested:
6/13/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan 1.5 pt/a; Select 8 oz/a
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
18-46-60 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
90-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Soil type:
Stoy silt loam
Elevation:
415 ft
Latitude:
37°47N
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
50
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
40
30
05-06
20
Normal
10
harvest
bloom
plant
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 8. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Belleville, Illinois
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Kronos
ARC97019
ARC97018
KS3074
KS3068
Baldur
DSV 05100
Jetton
Virginia
Wichita
ARC98007
VSX-2
KS3350
ARC2180-1
ARC98015
DSV 05102
DSV 05101
KS2064
DSV 05104
TCI Exp 983
DSV 05103
KS3018
Casino
KS7436
KS9135
Sumner
KS9124
KS3254
KS2185
Abilene
Rasmus
KS3067
Plainsman
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
4204
4199
4185
4154
4121
4068
4042
3983
3963
3948
3937
3881
3875
3865
3779
3634
3619
3596
3580
3577
3539
3517
3448
3432
3428
3419
3401
3328
3288
3275
3270
2969
2647
-3672
7
426
lb/ac
3933
----3757
-3868
3869
3769
-3958
-3945
---3686
---3290
3593
3627
3685
3416
3860
-3738
3513
3548
-2944
3002
3667
---
3531
------3727
3677
3408
-3664
-3945
---3686
----3157
3249
3467
-3494
--3116
3445
-2935
2766
3356
---
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
---
%
84
----84
-89
77
90
-87
-91
---82
---75
89
87
87
85
95
-89
85
85
-82
75
85
---
87
------88
79
91
-83
-91
---82
----89
79
83
-91
--83
81
-83
67
85
---
%
78
88
92
78
85
83
87
82
82
85
83
87
83
90
80
85
82
77
85
83
82
85
77
78
78
80
83
80
80
57
63
87
65
-81
10
12
date
--------------------------------------
Matur- Plant
Height
ity
date
--------------------------------------
in.
56
52
53
52
51
53
56
48
48
52
54
49
52
53
58
56
55
51
55
54
56
50
53
49
54
48
50
53
47
54
51
50
57
55
52
4
3
t
t
s
s
s
t
t
t
t
t
s
s
s
s
s
s
t
t
Lodg- Shatter- Test
Weight
ing
ing
%
--------------------------------------
%
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
3.3
3.3
0.0
3.3
5.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
1.7
1.7
1.7
6.7
8.3
5.0
0.0
3.3
3.3
1.7
0.0
3.3
5.0
0.0
3.3
1.7
8.3
6.7
5.0
10.0
3.3
5.0
3.7
81.1
4.9
Total
Oil
lb/bu
47.2
47.7
47.9
48.9
48.8
47.1
48.1
47.1
47.3
48.7
47.5
46.7
48.1
47.1
46.9
47.0
46.6
48.7
47.7
48.8
46.3
48.6
46.5
48.8
47.3
49.5
48.1
47.3
47.6
48.8
46.2
49.5
47.6
46.8
47.7
1.1
0.9
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data
from 2005 and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
11
%
--------------------------------------
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Carbondale, Illinois
Michael Schmidt & Jim Klein, Southern Illinois University,
Carbondale
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/9/05 at 10 lbs/a in 7.5-in. rows
Harvested:
6/9/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan 1.5 pt/a; Select 8 oz/a
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
18-46-60 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
90-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Soil type:
Stoy silt loam
Elevation:
400 ft
Latitude:
38°30N
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
50
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
40
05-06
30
20
Normal
10
harvest
bloom
plant
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 9. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Carbondale, Illinois.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
DSV 05100
DSV 05101
DSV 05104
KS3254
KS9135
KS3074
ARC97018
KS2185
DSV 05103
Jetton
Baldur
ARC98015
VSX-2
Virginia
Sumner
KS7436
KS3350
Rasmus
Ceres
DSV 05102
Wichita
KS9124
ARC97019
KS3068
Casino
ARC2180-1
Abilene
KS3018
TCI Exp 983
Kronos
Plainsman
KS2064
ARC98007
KS3067
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
4202
4193
4134
3970
3832
3802
3792
3760
3759
3692
3643
3641
3630
3609
3607
3585
3556
3513
3500
3461
3429
3428
3410
3382
3365
3358
3353
3305
3278
3140
3134
3129
2912
-3561
8
447
lb/ac
----3153
--3360
-3163
2621
-3030
2979
2670
2826
-2981
2867
-2819
3025
--3120
-2668
2836
3278
3050
2668
2971
--3008
---
----3009
----2863
--2806
2647
-2501
-2763
2710
-2608
2832
--2523
-2407
--2650
2488
---2741
---
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
---
%
----72
--89
-89
80
-89
85
82
90
-82
75
-86
94
--97
-93
82
100
90
82
85
--85
---
----77
----84
--86
83
-89
-79
78
-87
93
--93
-92
--86
85
---85
---
0-10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
---
date
--------------------------------------
Matur- Plant
Height
ity
date
--------------------------------------
in.
50
50
52
52
51
47
49
46
52
45
50
54
46
44
45
50
50
47
49
50
49
46
49
51
48
51
51
50
49
51
52
50
51
45
49
4
4
t
t
t
t
t
s
s
t
s
t
t
s
s
s
t
t
s
t
s
t
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
s
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
27
17
0
10
7
17
20
3
33
10
3
37
0
7
0
13
23
10
0
27
37
7
53
20
10
23
23
13
30
17
0
30
47
67
19
66
20
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
50.8
49.7
49.4
49.4
50.2
50.4
49.6
50.1
48.6
49.1
50.8
49.0
49.4
49.5
50.9
50.5
49.7
49.8
51.2
50.9
50.5
49.9
50.8
50.0
48.9
48.8
51.2
50.6
49.6
51.4
50.6
50.9
49.4
-50
1.5
1.2
Total
Oil
%
--------------------------------------
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data
from 2005 and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
12
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Columbia City, Indiana
Shawn Conley & Ellsworth Christmas, Purdue University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/8/05 at 5 lbs/a in 6-in. rows
Harvested:
7/10/2006
Pesticides:
None
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
33-58-46 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
120-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Soil type:
Boyer sandy loam
Elevation:
830 ft
Latitude:
41°6N
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
40
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
30
Normal
20
05-06
10
bloom
plant
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 10. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Columbia City, Indiana.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
KS3018
KS3254
KS3074
KS9135
ARC97019
ARC98015
Casino
KS3067
KS2185
ARC98007
Sumner
KS3068
KS2064
KS3350
Ceres
Abilene
KS9124
Baldur
Kronos
Wichita
Plainsman
ARC2180-1
KS7436
Virginia
DSV 05101
ARC97018
Rasmus
DSV 05102
DSV 05103
DSV 05100
Jetton
DSV 05104
VSX-2
TCI Exp 983
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
1627
1554
1522
1480
1347
1324
1322
1289
1264
1262
1245
1244
1225
1222
1184
1128
1114
1097
1077
1076
1055
1023
981
938
911
863
845
831
756
615
602
573
520
.
1122
23
230
lb/ac
1823
--1972
--1800
-1774
-1765
-1732
-1318
1778
1465
-1615
1680
1349
1469
1490
1390
--1288
---1183
-1105
-1511
---
---1853
--------1732
-1165
1633
1333
-1550
1618
1214
-1544
1457
--1328
---1249
-1133
-1439
---
67
53
57
37
43
47
50
57
47
23
43
40
43
43
37
50
40
17
37
37
40
27
33
23
20
23
30
23
20
13
17
20
13
0
34
37
21
%
77
--62
--62
-60
-48
-67
-23
67
62
-40
42
49
42
50
32
--32
---35
-23
-41
---
---75
--------67
-49
78
74
-60
61
66
-84
70
--54
---57
-49
-61
---
%
43
47
53
53
53
50
53
47
47
53
50
60
53
50
27
53
43
50
50
47
47
57
47
50
43
53
37
47
47
40
47
53
53
47
49
19
NS
50%
Bloom
date
4/10
4/15
4/14
4/15
4/14
4/16
4/16
4/11
4/10
4/16
4/10
4/14
4/13
4/13
4/14
4/14
4/15
4/16
4/16
4/14
4/17
4/16
4/14
4/18
4/16
4/16
4/16
4/17
4/19
4/19
4/15
4/18
4/13
-4/15
1
3
e
l
l
e
e
l
e
e
e
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
e
Matur- Plant Lodg- Shatter- Test
Height ing
ity
ing
Weight
date
--------------------------------------
in.
52
54
51
54
55
56
52
50
46
51
48
53
52
51
54
54
53
55
56
50
56
55
50
44
51
51
50
50
53
50
50
52
46
.
52
5
5
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
s
t
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
s
t
t
t
t
s
%
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
46.9
45.9
47.6
46.2
44.5
45.2
45.1
46.8
47.6
44.2
47.2
47.8
46.5
45.5
46.0
47.1
43.1
45.0
43.9
45.9
45.0
44.3
44.9
43.9
44.7
43.2
42.0
45.9
44.2
44.3
41.7
43.0
41.4
.
45.1
2.7
2.2
Total
Oil
%
35.0
36.2
36.0
35.6
34.4
36.1
34.4
36.2
35.3
35.6
35.2
35.4
34.8
33.9
35.3
33.5
33.8
34.9
32.1
34.3
34.2
34.1
35.5
32.7
32.1
32.4
32.0
33.0
30.5
33.3
32.8
34.9
32.7
29.6
34.0
5.5
NS
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data
from 2005 and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
13
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Russellville, Kentucky
Brian Caldbeck, Miles Enterprises
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/22/2005 at 5 lbs/a in 7.5-in rows
Harvested:
6/14/2006
Pesticides:
Quadris 10 oz/a
Insecticides:
Warrior 2.56 oz/a
Irrigation:
none
Fertility:
18-46-60-15 lbs. N-P-K-S fertilizer in fall
120-0-0 N-P-K fertilizer & 1 lb. Boron in spring
Previous crop:
Soil type:
Elevation:
870 ft
Latitude:
38°32N
Comments:
60
40
20
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
60
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
50
40
Normal
30
plant
20
05-06
10
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 11. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Russellville, Kentucky.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Maturity
Plant
Height
DSV 05103
DSV 05100
DSV 05101
KS3074
DSV 05102
KS9135
KS2185
KS3068
Kronos
Plainsman
Wichita
TCI Exp 983
Virginia
KS9124
DSV 05104
VSX-2
Sumner
ARC98007
Rasmus
ARC97019
ARC98015
KS3254
Abilene
KS3350
KS7436
Baldur
Casino
Jetton
KS3067
KS2064
ARC97018
KS3018
ARC2180-1
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
3795
3540
3529
3300
3164
2885
2875
2818
2817
2814
2789
2747
2706
2693
2689
2686
2632
2579
2501
2466
2464
2426
2335
2292
2225
2182
2167
2164
2130
2110
2072
1988
1774
1693
2590
17
724
lb/ac
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
date
--------------------------------------
date
--------------------------------------
in.
64 t
64 t
63 t
56 s
61 t
61 t
54 s
58 s
61 t
62 t
60 t
62 t
57 s
57 s
65 t
61 t
58 s
64 t
58 s
62 t
63 t
62 t
57 s
60 t
58 s
64 t
61 t
55 s
57 s
59 s
58 s
59 s
63 t
58 s
60
5
5
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
Total
Oil
%
28.3
10.0
8.3
21.7
31.7
21.7
28.3
21.7
1.7
10.0
5.0
23.3
15.0
21.7
6.7
6.7
11.7
23.3
8.3
21.7
36.7
31.7
43.3
30.0
5.0
16.7
5.0
25.0
18.3
36.7
38.3
30.0
43.3
28.3
21.0
83.8
28.7
%
37.1
38.9
37.2
38.1
36.7
37.2
36.0
38.1
36.9
37.1
38.1
37.4
36.7
36.3
38.6
36.8
36.2
37.3
37.4
37.0
36.3
37.1
35.3
36.8
37.5
37.9
36.3
36.7
39.3
36.7
36.5
36.3
35.2
36.6
37.0
2.1
1.6
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
--------------------------------------
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
14
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
East Lansing, Michigan
Russell Freed, Michigan State University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/6/2005 at 7 lbs/a in 11-in. rows
Harvested:
7/24/2006
Pesticides:
None
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Previous crop: Soybean
Fertility:
66-66-66 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
78-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Soil type:
Capac loam
Elevation:
880 ft
42°40'N
Latitude:
Comments:
60
40
20
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
40
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
30
Normal
20
05-06
10
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 12. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at East Lansing, Michigan.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
**2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
DSV 05100
DSV 05103
DSV 05101
DSV 05102
DSV 05104
Jetton
KS3350
Rasmus
Virginia
VSX-2
KS7436
ARC97018
KS3254
Abilene
KS9124
Plainsman
KS3068
Sumner
Casino
Baldur
ARC97019
KS2185
Kronos
Wichita
KS3018
ARC2180-1
KS3067
KS3074
KS9135
ARC98007
KS2064
ARC98015
TCI Exp 983
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
3615
3565
3420
3150
3025
2730
2610
2495
2350
2345
2340
2335
2225
2180
2180
2180
2095
2095
2040
2035
1985
1985
1965
1950
1940
1910
1875
1875
1825
1705
1595
1440
1355
1260
2226
---
lb/ac
-----2287
-2008
2208
1588
1619
--2367
1802
2264
-2135
1653
1668
-1581
2148
1997
1858
1853
--2178
-1121
--882
1948
---
-----1931
-1915
1867
1608
1411
--2124
1604
1859
--1719
1668
--1742
1751
---------1190
1806
---
--------------------------------------
%
-----33
-10
50
3
10
--67
15
25
-67
15
30
-23
65
67
37
22
--63
-7
--5
34
---
-----67
-55
75
52
55
--84
58
63
--58
---83
84
----82
----53
67
---
%
--------------------------------------
date
--------------------------------------
Matur- Plant
ity
Height
date
--------------------------------------
in.
62
58
58
61
62
59
57
60
57
59
61
60
59
60
60
59
60
58
60
60
61
59
61
58
59
61
59
61
59
63
59
62
59
62
60
4
NS
Lodg- Shatter- Test
Weight
ing
ing
Total
Oil
%
0
50
52
35
0
0
42
41
0
0
42
42
38
40
42
40
37
40
22
0
22
60
59
35
45
30
60
59
42
49
55
54
0
0
33.3
0.3
20
%
40.0
39.0
39.8
39.1
40.6
39.1
38.7
39.5
38.7
38.5
41.0
39.7
38.9
37.1
37.5
38.4
38.4
37.8
39.1
40.0
36.6
38.4
38.5
37.9
38.4
38.7
39.1
39.6
38.9
39.3
37.5
39.9
41.8
39.4
38.9
2.1
1.9
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
--------------------------------------
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data from 2005
and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006. **2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3 yr means include data
from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
15
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Custar, Ohio
Edwin Lentz, The Ohio State University, Northwest OARDC
Research Station
Planted on 9/7/2005 in 7-in. rows
Harvested:
7/6/2006
Pesticides:
5 oz Select
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
8.4-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilzer in the fall
Previous crop: Wheat
Soil type:
Hoytville clay loam
Elevation:
700 ft
Latitude:
41°13N
Comments:
Moldboard plowed, disked, cultipacked, leveled, cultivated,
and cultipacked after planting.
100
Temperature-F
80
60
40
20
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
50
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
40
05-06
30
20
Normal
10
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 13. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Custar, Ohio.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
KS3254
Baldur
Kronos
DSV 05100
ARC97019
KS3068
KS9135
ARC2180-1
KS3018
DSV 05102
KS3074
Ceres
KS2064
Rasmus
ARC98007
ARC97018
KS3350
Wichita
Casino
Jetton
ARC98015
VSX-2
Abilene
DSV 05101
KS2185
KS3067
KS9124
DSV 05103
KS7436
Sumner
Plainsman
DSV 05104
Virginia
TCI Exp 983
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
4447
4392
4375
4371
4333
4263
4209
4185
4168
4167
4149
4089
4084
4080
4066
4058
4043
4039
4003
3970
3947
3909
3889
3882
3832
3808
3803
3796
3795
3768
3597
3347
3282
3244
3982
6
382
lb/ac
--------------------------------------
--3789
---3498
----3446
-3244
---3300
3167
3403
-3344
3486
---3126
-3190
-3056
-3008
-3295
---
100
99
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
100
100
100
99
100
99
99
0.3
0.5
%
--------------------------------------
--99
---98
----99
-99
---98
98
98
-97
99
---98
-99
-98
-97
-97
---
%
88
87
85
82
93
97
95
95
93
81
95
78
85
85
90
94
96
92
86
93
96
95
83
88
90
90
88
88
82
82
85
82
95
96
89
5
7
date
4/24
4/22
4/23
4/23
4/23
4/26
4/23
4/23
4/21
4/24
4/25
4/22
4/23
4/23
4/26
4/24
4/24
4/23
4/25
4/22
4/26
4/23
4/22
4/22
4/20
4/24
4/26
4/25
4/27
4/22
4/25
4/24
4/23
4/24
4/24
1
2
e
l
e
l
e
l
e
l
e
e
e
l
l
l
e
l
Matur- Plant
Height
ity
date
--------------------------------------
in.
45
47
47
48
47
45
44
43
43
47
43
43
45
45
45
42
45
42
45
39
43
39
46
46
41
44
46
48
41
43
47
45
40
41
44
7
5
t
t
t
st
st
st
st
st
t
t
t
s
t
s
t
s
st
t
t
s
st
t
t
s
st
t
t
s
s
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
--------------------------------------
Total
Oil
%
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among valuses in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *3yr means include data from 2004 and
2006.
16
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Fremont, Ohio
Edwin Lentz, The Ohio State University, North Central OARDC
Research Station
Planted on 9/13/2005 in 7-in. rows
Harvested:
7/9/2006
Pesticides:
None
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
27-69-90 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
Previous crop: Fallow
Soil type:
Hoytville silty clay loam
Elevation:
636 ft
Latitude:
41°21N
Comments:
Deep chiseled, cultivated, leveled, and cultipacked after
planting.
100
Temperature-F
80
60
40
20
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
50
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
40
05-06
30
20
Normal
10
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 14. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Fremont, Ohio.
Yield
*2yr
Winter Survival
Line
2006
3yr
DSV 05100
DSV 05101
DSV 05102
DSV 05103
Rasmus
KS2185
Casino
Kronos
KS9124
KS3254
Wichita
ARC97019
Virginia
DSV 05104
Baldur
KS3068
ARC97018
KS3350
ARC2180-1
Jetton
ARC98015
KS7436
KS3018
Abilene
VSX-2
Plainsman
ARC98007
KS9135
KS3074
KS3067
KS2064
Sumner
TCI Exp 983
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
lb/ac
3194
--3086
--2958
--2635
--2604 2415 2676
2602 2594
-2575
-2850
2515 2366 2534
2485 2530 2704
2470
--2427 2339 2547
2425
--2411 2273 2599
2410
--2403 2321
-2385
--2372
--2367
--2345 1986.2
-2293 2158 2492
2269
--2226 2195
-2226 2202
-2219 2216 2360
2191 2049 2464
2141 1890 2246
2104
--2091 2159 2541
2083
--2054
--2042 1966
-1995 1961
-1862
--1719 1332 1820
2358 2199 2431
9.2
--354
---
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
100
100
100
99
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
100
99
100
100
99
100
99
100
100
100
100
100
99
100
100
99
100
100
100
100
99
100
100
0.5
NS
%
----89
99
-94
99
-92
-68
-86
---96
82
-97
100
97
62
99
-99
--100
98
-96
91
---
----85
-92
67
93
-87
-78
------77
---100
75
93
-83
-----77
84
---
0-10
9.7
9.2
9.8
8.8
8.8
9.5
9.2
9.0
9.2
9.3
9.2
9.5
9.3
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.5
8.8
9.2
9.3
9.0
9.0
9.0
8.8
9.2
8.8
9.4
9.0
9.2
9.0
8.8
8.8
9.5
6.0
9.1
5.4
8.0
date
4/25
4/26
4/26
4/27
4/23
4/22
4/28
4/24
4/29
4/29
4/25
4/26
4/24
4/25
4/24
4/28
4/26
4/26
4/25
4/24
4/29
4/27
4/26
4/26
4/24
4/30
4/27
4/28
4/28
4/28
4/26
4/24
4/25
4/27
4/26
0.9
2
l
e
e
l
e
l
l
e
e
l
e
l
l
e
l
l
l
l
e
l
Matur- Plant
Height
ity
date
--------------------------------------
in.
50
49
50
48
44
43
50
51
46
46
46
49
41
48
48
47
46
42
46
39
49
47
46
48
40
54
47
42
46
43
48
43
42
46
46
6.2
5
t
t
t
s
s
t
t
t
s
s
s
t
s
t
s
s
s
s
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
--------------------------------------
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
--------------------------------------
Total
Oil
%
--------------------------------------
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data
from 2005 and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
17
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
State College, Pennsylvania
Greg Roth & Mary Carol Frier, Russell Larson Experiment
Farm, Centre County, Pennsylvania State University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/12/2005 at 6 lbs/a in 7-in. rows
Harvested:
7/7/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
100-0-0-8 lbs. fertilizer N-P-K-S in the spring
Previous crop: Wheat
Soil type:
Haggerstown/Murrill silt loam
Elevation:
1219 ft
Latitude:
40°77N
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
6/1
7/1
40
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
30
Normal
20
05-06
10
bloom
plant
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
Table 15. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at State College, Pennsylvania.
Winter Survival
Yield
Line
2006
2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
Abilene
Virginia
Jetton
KS3074
VSX-2
Baldur
Kronos
KS3067
KS3254
KS3018
KS3068
KS9135
KS3350
ARC97019
KS2185
KS2064
ARC2180-1
Wichita
KS9124
TCI Exp 983
Casino
Rasmus
ARC97018
ARC98007
KS7436
Sumner
Ceres
ARC98015
DSV 05100
DSV 05102
DSV 05101
DSV 05103
DSV 05104
Plainsman
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
3286
3215
3056
3015
2994
2984
2983
2955
2872
2868
2814
2802
2777
2764
2752
2732
2725
2704
2664
2658
2598
2589
2564
2550
2533
2495
2418
2371
2165
2096
1993
1891
1821
1695
2629
13
555
lb/ac
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
93
93
92
97
92
95
93
97
97
95
95
97
92
92
93
93
95
95
95
95
92
95
95
95
95
95
93
95
95
97
97
95
95
97
95
3
NS
%
--------------------------------------
--------------------------------------
%
83
93
83
80
82
83
66
83
92
83
86
80
76
87
73
75
83
73
83
83
82
70
83
80
72
66
81
82
85
72
70
73
70
53
78
17
13
date
4/30
4/26 e
4/29 e
5/2 l
4/30
4/30
5/1
5/1
5/3 l
4/30
5/3 l
5/4 l
5/2 l
5/1
4/28 e
5/1
4/29 e
5/1
5/4 l
4/30
5/3 l
4/29 e
4/30
5/2 l
4/28 e
4/26 e
5/4 l
5/3 l
4/30
4/30
4/30
5/3 l
4/30
5/5 l
5/1
1
3
Matur- Plant Lodg- Shatter- Test
ity
Height ing
Weight
ing
date
6/27
6/28
6/30
6/28
6/26
7/1
6/29
6/30
7/1
6/27
6/28
6/29
6/30
6/27
6/27
6/29
7/1
6/28
7/1
6/29
7/2
6/29
6/28
6/30
6/27
6/26
6/28
7/2
6/11
6/29
7/3
6/30
6/28
7/4
6/29
2
NS
in.
55
47
48
52
49
51
55
53
55
53
54
56
50
56
44
52
54
52
53
50
52
50
53
56
53
48
52
57
54
54
54
57
53
59
53
4
5
t
s
s
t
t
t
t
s
t
t
s
t
t
t
%
--------------------------------------
%
33
33
27
33
31
33
30
23
23
23
33
27
23
36
33
33
30
27
27
27
36
33
33
27
21
33
34
21
23
36
23
27
33
23
29
25
NS
lb/bu
51.0
50.6
50.0
51.5
50.4
51.0
51.6
51.3
51.6
51.1
51.6
50.7
50.6
51.0
51.1
50.8
50.1
51.3
50.3
50.9
49.5
48.7
51.2
50.2
51.7
51.9
52.5
49.9
50.6
51.1
50.4
49.5
50.3
47.4
50.7
1.3
1.5
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
18
Total
Oil
%
41.0
40.1
40.4
41.3
41.1
40.0
40.2
40.4
40.4
40.8
40.2
40.5
40.5
40.4
40.2
41.5
38.8
40.6
41.5
40.0
40.5
39.9
42.9
41.0
43.5
40.7
39.9
41.0
41.1
39.8
40.6
40.7
41.2
40.3
40.6
2.4
NS
Height - inches
19
Figure 2. Midwest Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2006.
Sumner
Casino
KS7436
DSV 05101
Virginia
DSV 05104
DSV 05103
Rasmus
Rasmus
KS3350
TCI Exp 983
KS3018
Sumner
KS3067
Ceres
Plainsman
Baldur
KS3067
VSX-2
Virginia
Jetton
KS2185
VSX-2
KS2064
ARC98007
ARC97018
Mean
ARC98015
ARC98007
Ceres
KS3074
TCI Exp 983
ARC2180-1
Jetton
Ceres
KS3018
DSV 05104
DSV 05102
Wichita
ARC97018
DSV 05100
VSX-2
Abilene
ARC2180-1
Mean
KS3067
Wichita
Mean
Abilene
KS2064
KS7436
Rasmus
KS3068
KS3068
KS3350
Baldur
KS9124
ARC97019
KS9124
Plainsman
KS3350
ARC97018
Kronos
ARC98015
Baldur
Jetton
Kronos
Wichita
ARC2180-1
KS9135
Virginia
Sumner
KS7436
KS9135
ARC97019
TCI Exp 983
KS3254
Kronos
KS3068
KS3254
DSV 05102
DSV 05101
KS2185
KS3074
DSV 05102
DSV 05103
KS3074
DSV 05101
DSV 05100
ARC97019
-10
KS3254
-5
Abilene
0
Casino
5
Casino
KS2064
DSV 05104
10
ARC98007
KS9124
-6
DSV 05100
-4
KS9135
-2
DSV 05103
0
KS2185
2
KS3018
4
Plainsman
6
ARC98015
Survival - %
Yield - lb/a
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
700
500
300
100
-100
-300
-500
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
3
50% Bloom
2
1
0
-1
-2
-3
Virginia
Sumner
KS2185
DSV 05103
Plainsman
KS3018
DSV 05102
ARC2180-1
Jetton
TCI Exp 983
Abilene
Abilene
TCI Exp 983
Rasmus
VSX-2
DSV 05101
Casino
VSX-2
Wichita
Kronos
KS3018
Mean
KS2064
ARC97019
KS7436
DSV 05101
KS2185
KS3067
KS9124
Baldur
ARC97019
Ceres
Kronos
ARC2180-1
Mean
KS3350
Jetton
KS2064
Ceres
ARC97018
DSV 05100
ARC97018
DSV 05102
KS3074
Rasmus
Wichita
KS9135
DSV 05104
Sumner
KS3067
Virginia
KS3074
KS3350
DSV 05100
KS9135
KS3068
ARC98015
Casino
KS3254
KS3254
KS9124
ARC98007
KS7436
Baldur
DSV 05103
DSV 05104
ARC98007
Plainsman
ARC98015
KS3068
-4
2.0
Total Oil - %
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
Note: Values are the averages of the
differences between each cultivar and the
mean of Ceres, Jetton, Plainsman, and
Wichita for yield (lbs/a), winter survival (%),
plant height (inches), 50% bloom date
(days), and total oil content (%). The number
of observations for each trait is represented
by the different colors of the bars (as shown
at right).
0 to 15
Observations
16-30
Observations
More than 30
Observations
Figure 2. Midwest Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2006 (continued).
20
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Fruita, Colorado
Calvin Pearson, Western Colorado Research Center, Colorado
State University
Planted on 9/7/05 at 4.5 lbs/a in 30 in rows.
Harvested:
7/24/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan 1.5pt/a
Insecticides:
Irrigation:
Furrow Irrigation
Previous crop:
Fertility:
75-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Soil type:
Youngston clay loam
Elevation:
4624 ft
Latitude:
39°10N
Comments:
100
Temperature-F
80
60
40
20
plant
bloom
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
10
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
05-06
5
Normal
bloom
plant
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 16. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Fruita, Colorado
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
DSV 05101
Kronos
DSV 05100
KS7436
ARC97018
Abilene
KS2185
KS3254
Baldur
DSV 05103
DSV 05102
Rasmus
KS3350
KS3074
Wichita
ARC2180-1
Casino
VSX-2
KS9135
ARC98007
KS3068
KS3018
ARC97019
Sumner
TCI Exp 983
DSV 05104
ARC98015
KS9124
Virginia
KS2064
KS3067
Ceres
DKW13-86
Jetton
Plainsman
DKW13-62
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
2556
2521
2265
2241
2164
2117
2102
2095
2033
1992
1925
1912
1910
1887
1828
1809
1788
1785
1753
1727
1712
1704
1686
1684
1635
1628
1613
1575
1564
1553
1510
1478
1437
1426
1033
781
1790
18
514
lb/ac
-2688
-2164
-2158
2173
-2530
--2451
--1995
2015
1862
1978
1929
--1855
-2026
---1716
2111
1661
-2032
-2130
1315
-2057
---
----------------------------------------
100
93
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
92
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
97
100
100
100
100
3
NS
%
-97
-100
-100
100
-100
--100
--100
96
100
100
100
--100
-100
---100
100
99
-100
-100
100
-100
---
----------------------------------------
0-10
9.9
9.8
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.9
9.9
10.0
10.0
9.8
9.9
9.8
9.9
9.9
9.9
10.0
9.7
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.8
9.9
9.9
10.0
9.8
10.0
9.8
9.9
6.8
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
9.8
1.8
0.3
date
4/26
4/24 e
4/27
4/25 e
4/25 e
4/26
4/24 e
4/27
4/24 e
4/26
4/26
4/24 e
4/25 e
4/26
4/25 e
4/27
4/25 e
4/25 e
4/25 e
4/26
4/25 e
4/25 e
4/25 e
4/24 e
4/27
4/26
4/27
4/26
4/26
4/25 e
4/25 e
4/25 e
4/26
4/26
4/30 l
4/27
4/26
1
2
Matur- Plant
Height
ity
date
----------------------------------------
in.
51
52
51
46
48
49
44
53
50
51
50
47
49
51
46
52
50
46
50
52
49
50
46
47
49
50
55
49
46
51
50
46
46
46
51
51
49
4
3
t
s
s
t
s
t
s
t
s
t
s
s
s
s
Lodg- Shatter- Test
Weight
ing
ing
Total
Oil
%
3.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.7
3.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
11.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1
325
5.6
%
40.2
38.2
40.8
41.6
39.1
39.5
41.1
40.0
40.2
39.7
41.0
39.8
40.0
40.1
40.0
40.1
39.1
40.1
39.2
39.6
39.4
33.9
38.1
39.6
41.6
39.7
40.3
38.7
39.1
37.1
39.7
40.3
38.6
40.1
37.1
39.9
39.5
4.0
NS
%
0.0
5.0
0.0
0.0
3.3
3.3
0.0
3.3
5.0
0.0
0.0
5.0
1.7
1.7
1.7
6.7
8.3
5.0
0.0
3.3
3.3
1.7
0.0
3.3
5.0
0.0
3.3
1.7
8.3
6.7
5.0
10.0
3.3
5.0
8.3
15.0
3.7
81.1
4.9
lb/bu
50.4
50.2
48.7
50.8
49.3
50.3
49.3
51.0
49.4
49.6
48.8
46.2
49.2
49.7
48.0
48.4
49.9
49.1
47.0
48.1
47.1
48.1
45.9
47.8
49.3
47.6
47.3
46.9
48.1
47.5
48.3
50.6
49.4
49.1
46.8
46.2
48.6
3.9
3.1
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data
from 2005 and 2006.
21
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Rocky Ford, Colorado
Abdel Berrada, Arkansas Valley Research Center, Colorado
State University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 8/31/05 at 6.4 lbs/a on 30-in beds
Harvested:
6/28/2006 through mid July
Pesticides:
Roundup 1 lb/a & Treflan 1.5 pt/a on 8/29/05
Select 2EC 4.5 oz/a on 9/29/05
Insecticides:
Capture 2EC 2.5 oz/a to control flea beetles
Irrigation:
3 inches in fall and 5 inches in spring
Fertility:
50-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall and spring
Previous crop:
Soil type:
Rocky Ford silty clay loam
Elevation:
4180 ft
Latitude:
38°3N
Comments:
Stands and fall growth were excellent. Some weed pressures
may have reduced yield potential.
60
40
20
plant
bloom harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
15
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
10
Normal
5
05-06
bloom harvest
plant
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 17. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Rocky Ford, Colorado
Yield
Line
2006
DKW13-86
KS2064
Ceres
KS3067
DSV 05103
ARC97019
KS3068
Kronos
Sumner
KS7436
DSV 05100
DSV 05104
KS9135
ARC98007
KS3254
Plainsman
Abilene
Wichita
KS3350
KS3074
ARC98015
KS9124
Baldur
DSV 05102
DKW13-62
KS2185
Jetton
Rasmus
KS3018
DSV 05101
Virginia
Casino
VSX-2
ARC2180-1
ARC97018
TCI Exp 983
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.07)
3171
2580
2481
2438
2410
2200
2188
2153
2141
2058
2016
1948
1947
1945
1897
1861
1852
1838
1665
1644
1541
1530
1445
1265
1261
1251
1226
1167
1125
1111
839
807
752
---1750
35
1036
*2yr
lb/ac
---------------------------------------
Winter Survival
3yr
2006
----------------------------------------
56
80
89
81
77
53
77
80
71
67
58
65
80
56
76
86
77
60
69
78
73
85
74
65
60
68
57
67
82
58
46
75
66
25
31
23
66
17
15
2yr
%
---------------------------------------
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
----------------------------------------
0-10
4.3
9.5
2.2
9.2
6.8
9.3
9.3
5.8
8.3
8.3
9.5
8.0
9.3
10.0
9.5
8.2
9.0
9.5
10.0
8.8
9.5
8.7
7.5
8.3
8.8
9.2
9.2
8.7
9.5
8.3
9.0
9.3
9.0
10.0
9.5
9.5
8.6
8.2
5.9
date
4/29
4/24
4/24
4/26
4/25
5/12
4/25
4/24
4/25
4/26
5/11
-4/25
5/11
5/12
4/25
5/2
5/3
4/26
4/26
5/12
4/26
4/24
5/9
5/13
4/25
5/12
5/1
4/24
5/11
-5/2
-5/16
------
Matur- Plant
Height
ity
date
----------------------------------------
in.
34
35
36
34
37
37
33
36
34
33
35
35
36
35
30
35
33
33
36
32
34
35
33
36
33
32
35
32
29
31
29
34
28
38
34
36
34
10
NS
Lodg- Shatter- Test
Weight
ing
ing
%
----------------------------------------
%
6.6
4.5
17.1
2.6
2.3
12.8
3.1
16.1
3.5
8.3
3.6
4.9
14.3
13.4
7.4
2.1
8.6
2.3
5.0
2.0
21.5
5.8
4.5
4.3
-3.3
7.4
2.8
6.0
2.4
7.0
10.0
4.5
9.8
12.5
-----
lb/bu
----------------------------------------
Total
Oil
%
36.2
38.0
38.1
37.7
38.7
36.3
37.8
35.8
36.3
37.0
38.2
36.1
37.1
38.5
38.8
38.3
38.3
37.9
31.7
38.5
39.3
38.0
40.9
39.1
37.3
29.4
37.4
37.0
33.8
35.7
38.3
38.6
38.6
---37.2
5.5
4.2
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
22
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Colby, Kansas
Robert Aiken, NWREC Crops Program, Kansas State
University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 8/22/05 at 5 lbs/a in 12-in. rows
Harvested:
6/28/2006
Pesticides:
3 oz/a Select on 9/12/05 and 2 pt/a Poast on
10/17/05
Irrigation:
3.95 inches in the fall and 6.75 inches in the
spring
Fertility:
68-30-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
Previous crop: Wheat
Soil type:
Keith silt loam
Elevation:
3170 ft
39°29N
Latitude:
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
30
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
20
Normal
10
05-06
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 18. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Colby, Kansas.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
VSX-2
Jetton
KS3067
KS9124
KS3254
KS3068
ARC98007
KS3350
Baldur
ARC97018
Wichita
KS3074
DSV 05102
DSV 05100
Virginia
Plainsman
KS9135
ARC2180-1
KS2064
ARC97019
KS2185
ARC98015
KS3018
Casino
Kronos
Sumner
Abilene
TCI Exp 983
Rasmus
DKW13-86
DSV 05101
KS7436
DSV 05104
DSV 05103
DKW13-62
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
1082
949
903
854
812
811
799
797
789
765
764
737
728
695
693
678
677
667
649
610
606
586
578
497
490
481
457
413
409
399
363
351
351
345
269
--630
36
370
lb/ac
811
754
-680
------789
----522
655
------752
-748
913
-515
--452
---277
579
---
-1020
--------849
----517
-------897
-748
803
----889
---371
776
---
67
72
70
72
65
78
63
70
70
65
75
72
65
60
72
67
62
62
77
67
65
62
78
72
67
70
68
60
60
57
65
47
60
57
52
47
65
16
17
%
52
48
-68
------72
----70
62
------63
-64
65
-55
--42
---52
55
---
-65
--------81
----80
-------75
-75
75
----61
---65
69
---
%
83
88
77
80
80
77
88
87
83
82
77
88
93
87
75
78
78
88
83
90
77
83
80
87
60
80
80
88
80
88
88
78
80
92
83
52
82
9
12
date
4/24
4/26
4/23
4/27
4/28
4/26
4/26
4/24
4/23
4/24
4/24
4/24
4/28
4/26
4/25
5/1
4/23
4/26
4/23
4/25
4/21
4/27
4/20
4/28
4/27
4/22
4/24
4/23
4/25
4/29
4/25
4/26
4/29
5/1
5/1
4/29
4/26
2
3
e
e
l
e
e
e
e
e
e
l
l
l
l
l
Matur- Plant
ity
Height
date
----------------------------------------
in.
----------------------------------------
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
----------------------------------------
%
----------------------------------------
lb/bu
47
47
48
47
47
49
46
46
47
47
49
48
46
46
47
44
48
46
47
46
48
47
46
44
47
48
44
44
43
47
43
46
43
44
44
--46
4
3
Total
Oil
%
36.8
35.7
35.7
34.8
36.0
35.0
35.9
34.2
35.8
35.4
35.0
35.8
34.4
35.3
34.9
33.4
34.8
35.3
34.7
35.2
36.1
35.8
33.4
34.9
34.7
35.0
35.4
39.2
35.2
35.4
37.0
36.3
35.2
34.8
36.6
34.0
35.4
2.0
1.5
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data from 2004 and
2006, 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2006
23
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Hutchinson, Kansas
William Heer & Victor Martin, South Central Experiment Field,
Kansas State University
Planted on 9/16/05 at 5 lbs/a in 8-in rows.
Harvested:
6/20/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan
Insecticides:
Warrior
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
25-40-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
75-0-0 lbs N-P-K fertilizer in the sping
Soil type:
Ost silt loam
Elevation:
1570 ft
Latitude:
37°56N
Comments:
100
Temperature-F
80
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
30
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
20
Normal
10
Dry conditions at planting reduced stands. Plants were able to
compensate with branching. Plants were reduced in height due
to low rainfall.
05-06
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 19. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Hutchinson, Kansas.
Winter Survival
Yield
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
ARC97019
ARC98015
KS9124
Virginia
DSV 05100
KS3254
Baldur
Kronos
Wichita
KS3074
KS3350
KS3018
ARC97018
KS2064
KS9135
KS7436
KS3068
KS3067
ARC2180-1
VSX-2
ARC98007
DSV 05102
Abilene
DSV 05103
Casino
Jetton
KS2185
DKW13-86
Plainsman
DKW13-62
Ceres
DSV 05101
Rasmus
DSV 05104
Sumner
TCI Exp 983
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
1673
1582
1563
1516
1426
1425
1418
1394
1352
1341
1340
1333
1311
1301
1300
1295
1295
1286
1284
1276
1276
1261
1247
1179
1156
1155
1112
1079
1051
1043
1009
973
947
937
896
843
1247
18
360
lb/ac
--1493
1399
--1260
1373
1334
----1255
1287
1278
--1239
1231
--1303
--1160
1169
1076
1066
1057
945
-1008
-967
-1205
---
--2006
1968
---2003
1992
----1255
1869
2132
---1899
--1899
--2090
-1736
1588
1529
1531
-1685
-1656
-1769
---
100
100
100
100
97
100
99
100
100
100
100
100
99
99
100
100
100
100
99
100
99
100
100
100
100
100
100
96
100
95
100
99
100
98
100
93
99
2
3
%
--100
99
--99
100
100
----99
100
100
--99
98
--100
--100
100
98
100
96
100
-100
-100
-99
---
--100
99
---100
100
----99
100
100
---98
--100
--100
-98
100
97
100
-100
-100
-100
---
0-10
8.3
7.3
6.0
7.0
7.0
7.0
6.3
5.7
8.0
6.3
8.3
7.7
7.7
6.0
6.3
5.3
6.7
6.3
8.0
7.7
7.7
6.3
5.3
6.3
6.7
7.0
7.0
6.0
5.7
5.3
2.3
7.0
5.7
7.0
4.7
7.0
6.6
18.2
1.9
date
----------------------------------------
Matur- Plant
**Reity
Height growth
date
----------------------------------------
in.
36
35
37
35
34
34
36
39
31
37
33
35
33
36
40
33
34
36
36
32
34
38
37
39
35
30
31
31
38
37
36
35
32
35
31
33
35
7
4
t
t
s
s
t
t
s
t
s
s
t
t
s
s
t
t
s
s
t
t
t
s
s
s
t
t
t
s
s
s
%
0.0
5.7
1.7
1.7
2.7
3.7
4.0
0.0
2.0
0.7
2.7
2.3
1.0
1.0
4.3
0.3
2.0
1.7
3.7
1.0
5.7
6.0
1.3
8.3
5.7
2.0
4.3
1.0
13.3
3.0
0.0
9.0
8.3
20.0
0.0
15.3
4.0
102.0
6.7
Shatter- Test
ing
Weight
%
2.7
4.0
2.7
3.0
0.7
1.0
4.0
6.7
6.7
3.0
5.3
4.3
4.3
10.0
3.0
1.0
3.0
1.3
3.0
2.7
2.7
0.3
4.0
0.7
3.0
3.7
6.0
1.3
0.7
3.7
1.3
0.3
1.3
0.3
8.7
2.3
3.1
94.3
4.8
lb/bu
50.2
51.2
51.2
50.4
51.6
51.6
51.1
50.9
51.6
52.5
50.6
49.4
50.4
50.6
51.5
51.2
50.8
51.9
50.2
48.5
50.7
51.0
51.1
51.0
50.4
50.3
49.9
52.3
50.4
50.7
50.8
50.0
48.7
51.6
49.7
50.7
50.8
1.8
1.5
Total
Oil
%
37.7
36.4
36.8
36.2
37.0
37.3
38.1
36.3
36.6
36.0
36.4
35.7
37.3
36.7
35.3
37.7
36.3
37.2
35.6
37.1
36.8
36.5
36.0
36.4
36.0
36.8
36.4
36.9
35.0
37.2
34.0
37.2
36.3
37.1
37.2
40.1
36.6
1.8
1.5
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data
from 2005 and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006. **Regrowth was rated as percentage of plants with new growth
at harvest.
24
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Columbia, Missouri
Howard Mason, Crop Performance Testing, University of
Missouri
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 10/3/2005 at 8lbs/a in 7-in. rows
Harvested:
6/20/2006
Pesticides:
None
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
90-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer
Previous crop: Wheat
Soil type:
Mexico silt loam
Elevation:
870 ft
Latitude:
38°32N
Comments:
Planting date was later than normal. Very dry conditions at
planting resulted in poor stands. Dry conditions persisted from
November to February and rainfall totaled 3.5 inches.
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
40
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
30
Normal
20
05-06
10
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 20. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Columbia, Missouri.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
KS3350
Abilene
ARC97019
KS3068
KS3074
Wichita
KS3018
Sumner
KS2185
Kronos
KS9135
Baldur
KS7436
ARC98015
Jetton
ARC98007
Casino
VSX-2
Virginia
KS3067
ARC97018
KS2064
Rasmus
KS9124
ARC2180-1
DSV 05101
DSV 05103
DSV 05100
Plainsman
KS3254
DSV 05102
DSV 05104
Ceres
TCI Exp 983
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
511
486
427
379
334
314
311
299
290
285
285
277
263
257
257
256
244
234
225
221
157
154
154
152
150
147
134
108
100
94
67
48
32
32
235
76.4
NS
lb/ac
-620
---502
-557
541
552
660
570
447
-419
-564
373
477
--463
365
568
----250
---219
-490
---
-791
---738
-665
-775
847
-784
-691
-733
703
761
---824
1292
----494
---506
-650
---
62
55
47
58
47
53
63
55
65
35
63
63
28
73
38
43
50
65
52
53
30
55
40
50
38
47
43
37
58
33
45
43
42
27
49
46
NS
%
-67
---62
-61
69
45
69
61
45
-44
-61
56
52
--66
53
63
----63
---53
-57
---
-74
---72
-70
-59
77
-61
-55
-70
67
62
---78
85
----73
---63
-66
---
0-10
3.2
3.7
5.5
6.0
4.0
3.0
4.0
5.2
3.0
3.7
4.2
3.3
4.3
5.2
3.3
2.7
4.7
3.0
2.8
2.5
3.8
3.7
2.8
3.0
3.8
2.3
4.3
4.5
3.7
4.3
4.2
1.8
3.5
2.7
3.7
36.4
NS
date
--------------------------------------
Matur- Plant
Height
ity
date
--------------------------------------
in.
36
37
37
38
35
35
36
34
31
39
38
37
35
40
33
38
35
35
34
38
38
35
34
37
38
37
36
25
38
36
38
11
23
24
34
21
12
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
s
s
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
3
13
10
12
7
13
10
7
13
18
12
13
7
7
10
17
8
15
8
12
13
18
27
3
3
27
15
8
0
5
13
7
0
0
10
76
13
%
--------------------------------------
lb/bu
--------------------------------------
Total
Oil
%
35.2
36.1
37.6
37.4
37.5
35.2
34.3
35.0
35.2
35.0
36.0
38.1
36.9
35.3
38.1
36.4
36.2
36.2
38.0
37.6
37.1
36.2
35.0
35.5
35.4
31.2
35.6
40.1
34.9
37.8
36.4
33.8
36.9
36.6
36.1
4.0
NS
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data from 2005
and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
25
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Lincoln, Nebraska
Lenis Nelson, University of Nebraska
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/14/05 at 5 lbs/a in 9-in rows.
Harvested:
7/10/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan 1.5pt/a
Insecticides:
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
55-50-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
Previous Crop:
Soil type:
Sharpsburg soil series
Elevation:
1217 ft
Latitude:
48°8N
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
30
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
20
Normal
05-06
10
plant
bloom
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 21. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Lincoln, Nebraska.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
**2yr
KS9124
KS3254
Abilene
DSV 05102
DSV 05103
KS7436
Jetton
KS3018
KS3068
ARC98015
KS3074
Virginia
ARC98007
KS9135
ARC2180-1
KS3350
Sumner
KS2185
Casino
Wichita
DSV 05100
DSV 05101
Plainsman
Baldur
KS2064
VSX-2
Kronos
ARC97019
Ceres
Rasmus
KS3067
DKW13-86
DKW13-62
ARC97018
DSV 05104
TCI Exp 983
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
3150
2997
2798
2707
2647
2558
2553
2543
2502
2477
2461
2446
2446
2442
2425
2416
2406
2373
2356
2345
2283
2280
2271
2266
2250
2197
2187
2142
2022
1972
1844
1757
1752
1745
1568
1218
2303
17
794
lb/ac
2663
-2397
--2212
2214
2123
---2201
-2170
2182
-2065
2093
2051
2002
--1896
2120
1893
1988
1937
-1788
1851
-1612
1589
---1707
---
2429
-2303
--2304
2083
----2201
-2230
--2040
-2013
2043
--1770
--2135
2171
-1796
1767
-1723
1607
---1780
---
----------------------------------------
%
100
-97
--100
100
100
---97
-100
100
-98
100
100
100
--100
100
-98
100
-100
98
-100
100
---99
---
3yr
98
-96
--100
99
------96
--95
97
99
--99
--97
99
-95
87
-99
100
---97
---
Fall
Stand
0-10
8.2
8.5
8.8
9.7
9.2
9.0
8.7
9.3
9.2
9.7
8.8
8.3
9.3
8.8
9.3
9.2
8.5
9.2
8.5
9.5
9.3
9.0
8.3
9.3
8.8
7.2
9.3
8.7
3.7
8.5
9.8
8.7
8.0
9.5
8.5
8.3
9.6
8.7
1.4
Matur- Plant
50%
Height
ity
Bloom
date
----------------------------------------
date
----------------------------------------
in.
50
50
49
49
50
47
45
49
50
52
48
45
52
53
49
48
48
41
48
46
49
48
54
51
48
46
50
49
53
47
46
42
48
48
47
41
48
6
4
t
t
t
s
t
t
s
t
t
s
t
t
t
t
s
s
Lodg- Shatter- Test
Weight
ing
ing
%
----------------------------------------
%
1.7
1.7
2.3
1.7
1.3
1.7
1.3
2.0
2.7
2.0
3.7
1.0
2.7
4.0
2.0
1.7
1.3
1.0
2.3
3.3
0.3
1.3
2.3
1.3
1.3
0.3
2.0
1.0
2.3
0.7
2.0
1.3
2.3
1.3
2.7
3.0
1.9
78.4
NS
lb/bu
51.1
49.2
49.9
49.8
48.6
49.8
48.6
48.2
49.5
49.0
48.9
49.1
49.2
48.4
47.4
49.2
50.2
49.5
48.1
49.1
48.5
48.4
48.6
49.8
49.5
49.3
49.3
48.5
49.0
47.3
49.0
49.2
49.3
48.0
48.7
49.5
49.1
1.8
NS
Total
Oil
%
36.3
37.2
35.2
35.7
36.5
37.5
34.5
34.5
36.0
36.3
35.3
35.3
36.1
34.3
35.3
35.2
35.5
36.3
35.0
34.7
36.0
35.0
35.3
36.9
36.5
35.9
35.2
34.4
35.8
-36.4
36.2
-35.1
37.5
39.6
35.9
1.5
1.4
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data from 2005
and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006. **2yr means include data from 2004 and 2005, 3yr means include data
from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
26
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Chickasha, Oklahoma
Don Hooper, South Central Research Station, Oklahoma State
University
Planted on 9/21/05 at 5 lbs/a in 8-in. rows
Harvested:
6/6/2006
Pesticides:
None
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
120-0-0-20 lbs. N-P-K-S fertilizer
Previous crop: Wheat
Soil type:
Elevation:
1150 ft
Latitude:
35°3N
Comments:
100
Temperature-F
80
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1 12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
40
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
30
05-06
20
Dry conditions from November to June caused significant
reductions in yield. A secondary bloom in late spring further
reduced yield.
10
Normal
plant
harvest
bloom
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 22. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Chickasha, Oklahoma.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
DKW13-62
ARC2180-1
KS9135
KS7436
ARC97018
Baldur
Kronos
Wichita
ARC98015
ARC98007
TCI Exp 983
Jetton
VSX-2
Virginia
Rasmus
KS3074
ARC97019
KS9124
KS3068
DSV 05103
KS3350
KS3067
Abilene
Casino
DKW13-86
KS2064
DSV 05104
DSV 05102
DSV 05100
Plainsman
KS3254
KS2185
DSV 05101
Sumner
KS3018
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
599
547
542
521
514
511
508
480
474
464
456
438
431
431
425
422
407
406
399
374
363
359
327
323
308
307
291
283
261
255
246
228
219
205
203
177
385
46
NS
lb/ac
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
99
100
98
93
100
100
100
100
99
100
99
100
99
91
99
100
100
99
99
99
99
97
99
97
100
94
99
99
98
99
99
98
99
99
98
99
99
3
NS
%
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
0-10
8.7
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
9.0
8.7
8.3
8.3
8.0
8.7
8.3
8.7
7.7
7.0
9.0
8.3
8.3
9.0
8.7
8.0
8.3
8.0
8.7
8.3
7.7
8.3
9.0
8.0
8.3
7.3
7.3
7.0
8.3
6.0
8.2
12.6
NS
date
4/10
4/6
4/7
4/9
4/9
4/7
4/7
4/9
4/8
4/7
4/8
4/8
4/5
4/10
4/7
4/8
4/6
4/8
4/9
4/4
4/6
4/9
4/9
4/8
4/6
4/8
4/6
4/6
4/8
4/6
4/8
4/10
4/7
4/8
4/8
4/9
4/8
3
NS
Matur- Plant
Height
ity
date
----------------------------------------
in.
41
39
39
42
41
39
43
42
41
45
41
38
41
42
40
41
42
41
41
40
43
43
40
43
43
40
41
40
38
35
41
38
38
39
38
38
40
10
NS
*Regrowth
%
63
40
40
60
73
53
60
40
57
30
77
67
37
73
37
57
67
57
60
80
53
43
70
87
53
67
53
38
63
48
47
57
70
68
63
50
57
47
NS
Shatter- Test
Weight
ing
%
----------------------------------------
lb/bu
48.0
45.9
47.1
47.5
46.8
45.3
43.8
46.3
45.2
45.9
47.3
45.1
43.6
47.6
46.6
46.6
45.0
43.6
46.2
45.0
45.0
45.7
47.2
46.2
45.5
46.4
44.0
44.5
44.0
46.6
46.5
47.3
46.5
45.7
44.5
46.6
45.8
4.7
NS
Total
Oil
%
----------------------------------------
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *Regrowth was rated as percentage of
plants with new growth at harvest.
27
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Enid, Oklahoma
John Lamle, Gene McVey, & Van Schuermann, Johnston
Seed Company
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/20/05 at 5 lbs/a in 8-in. rows
Harvested:
6/7/2006
Pesticides:
Assure II
Insecticides:
Lorsban for aphid control
Fertility:
27-65-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
120 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Previous crop: Millet
Soil type:
Silt loam
Elevation:
1227 ft
Latitude:
36°26N
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1 12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
40
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
30
05-06
20
Stands were reduced at planting because of a dry seed bed.
Despite dry conditions in early spring, varieties were able to
compensate for the reduced stands, resulting in a respectable
yield. Minimal green regrowth observed.
Normal
10
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 23. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Enid, Oklahoma.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
ARC98007
KS3074
ARC97019
ARC97018
Sumner
DSV 05100
KS3067
KS3068
Abilene
KS9135
DSV 05102
KS2185
KS2064
Wichita
DSV 05103
KS3018
TCI Exp 983
KS3350
KS9124
Jetton
DKW13-86
Baldur
KS7436
KS3254
Rasmus
ARC2180-1
ARC98015
Virginia
VSX-2
DKW13-62
Kronos
Plainsman
DSV 05101
Casino
DSV 05104
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
1565
1527
1474
1401
1316
1313
1294
1279
1279
1261
1244
1198
1184
1169
1144
1137
1087
1077
1075
1050
1028
1019
1016
1016
1010
987
986
983
948
930
910
842
838
820
810
699
1104
17
312
lb/ac
----1111
---1278
1205
-1341
1187
1253
----1204
940
964
996
1065
-1114
967
-916
940
874
804
1019
---760
1036
---
----------------------------------------
98.3
96.0
96.0
92.7
98.3
95.0
91.7
98.3
100.0
99.3
95.0
96.7
96.0
96.0
94.3
98.3
96.7
98.3
98.3
91.0
93.3
96.0
99.3
97.7
97.7
95.0
97.7
90.0
97.0
92.0
91.7
98.3
88.3
97.7
88.3
96.7
96
4.8
NS
%
----98
---99
97
-98
97
97
----97
94
95
91
97
-96
95
-93
97
94
93
95
---94
95
---
----------------------------------------
0-10
6.7
5.7
6.7
7.0
5.0
6.0
5.3
5.0
3.0
4.7
5.0
5.3
4.7
5.0
5.7
4.0
6.0
5.0
5.3
5.3
6.3
3.7
4.3
4.7
2.7
7.7
5.3
6.0
5.7
4.7
3.7
3.7
4.0
4.7
5.3
2.3
5
30
2.5
date
4/5
4/4
4/5
3/30
3/31
4/6
4/6
4/8
4/3
4/6
4/8
3/27
4/5
4/2
4/6
3/30
3/30
4/4
4/8
4/2
4/5
4/5
4/4
4/8
4/3
4/2
4/6
4/5
4/4
4/12
4/7
4/11
4/8
4/9
4/10
4/5
4/5
2
3
Matur- Plant
ity
Height
e
e
e
e
l
l
l
l
date
----------------------------------------
in.
47
44
46
44
37
45
43
43
45
50
49
38
47
42
49
41
45
45
44
39
40
40
41
45
41
43
47
40
37
45
45
46
44
44
44
40
43
7
5
t
s
t
t
t
t
s
t
s
t
s
t
t
s
s
t
s
t
s
s
t
t
t
s
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
----------------------------------------
%
----------------------------------------
lb/bu
52.2
52.2
51.6
50.9
52.0
51.9
52.1
53.0
51.6
52.5
52.9
50.4
51.4
52.3
52.8
51.1
52.0
50.2
51.7
51.1
52.6
52.9
51.9
51.4
48.7
50.5
52.4
49.8
50.6
52.7
50.6
51.9
51.4
51.5
52.5
51.7
51.6
1.5
1.3
Total
Oil
%
35.6
34.7
33.1
33.6
35.2
34.2
34.3
33.7
34.0
34.2
33.6
34.9
34.5
33.5
34.8
33.6
37.7
33.7
33.7
33.4
33.3
34.1
35.4
33.8
34.2
34.0
33.2
32.0
32.8
32.6
33.9
33.6
33.0
32.0
34.5
32.9
33.9
2.5
1.7
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data from 2005
and 2006.
28
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Lahoma, Oklahoma
Ray Sidwell, North Central Research Station, Oklahoma State
University
Planted on 9/20/05 at 5 lbs/a in 8-in. rows
Harvested:
6/8/2006
Pesticides:
Trifluralin 1 qt/a
Insecticides:
Lorsban for aphid control in spring
Fertility:
26-68-0-21 lbs. N-P-K-S fertilizer in the fall
78-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Previous crop: Wheat
Soil Type:
Grant silt loam
Elevation:
1236 ft
Latitude:
36°23N
Comments:
100
Temperature-F
80
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
40
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
30
05-06
20
Adequate moisture at planting resulted in good fall stands. Dry
conditions that followed reduced overall plant height. No green
regrowth was observed.
10
Normal
bloom
plant
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 24. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Lahoma, Oklahoma.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
DSV 05103
DSV 05100
DSV 05101
Wichita
KS3254
Baldur
KS3074
KS3068
Abilene
ARC97019
KS2064
KS9135
ARC97018
KS3018
Kronos
ARC98007
KS9124
KS2185
DKW13-86
KS3067
DSV 05104
ARC98015
DSV 05102
ARC2180-1
KS3350
Sumner
Jetton
Virginia
DKW13-62
Plainsman
KS7436
Casino
VSX-2
Rasmus
TCI Exp 983
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
1309
1275
1167
1115
1089
1065
1053
1050
1044
1029
1016
995
989
979
976
970
965
959
907
882
878
868
824
812
804
786
782
770
764
755
740
728
673
659
590
426
908
18
273
lb/ac
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
100
99
100
100
100
100
100
100
97
100
100
100
98
100
100
100
100
100
95
100
100
100
100
100
98
100
100
1.5
NS
%
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
0-10
8.7
9.7
8.7
8.7
8.3
9.0
7.7
9.3
7.3
9.7
7.0
7.7
9.3
8.0
7.0
8.7
8.3
9.0
8.0
8.0
8.0
9.0
8.3
9.3
9.0
8.7
7.7
8.0
8.3
7.7
7.3
7.7
8.3
7.0
8.7
3.7
8.2
9.6
1.3
date
----------------------------------------
Matur- Plant
ity
Height
date
----------------------------------------
in.
41
35
37
37
37
37
39
39
37
39
42
43
37
39
41
41
35
33
35
39
40
39
41
38
35
35
33
31
39
38
35
39
33
35
31
37
37
6.6
4
t
s
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
s
s
s
t
t
t
t
s
s
s
s
t
s
t
s
s
s
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
----------------------------------------
%
----------------------------------------
lb/bu
52.2
51.3
50.8
50.9
51.3
50.7
50.8
50.7
51.0
49.1
51.3
50.2
49.6
48.3
51.7
50.9
49.8
48.6
51.9
49.0
51.3
51.2
51.5
49.0
47.6
50.3
49.7
48.7
50.5
51.0
50.7
51.6
48.2
46.2
49.9
51.2
50.2
2.3
1.9
Total
Oil
%
38.1
38.9
39.1
38.5
38.0
38.7
38.3
38.4
38.2
37.5
38.3
38.3
38.1
37.3
36.6
38.8
37.8
38.2
38.0
38.7
39.2
37.9
38.5
37.3
36.9
38.0
38.0
37.3
37.4
36.9
38.3
36.4
37.9
37.1
41.0
36.6
38.0
1.4
1.1
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest.
29
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Perkins, Oklahoma
Rick Matheson, Agronomy Research Station,
Oklahoma State University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/21/05 at 5 lbs/a in 8-in rows.
Harvested:
6/12/2006
Pesticides:
Trifluralin 1.5 pt/a
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
None
Fertility:
121-38-38 lbs. N-P-K fertilzer
Previous crop: Wheat
Soil type:
Tiller sandy loam
Elevation:
896 ft
Latitude:
35°58N
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
40
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
30
05-06
20
Excellent moisture at planting resulted in good stand
establishment. Minimal winter kill was oberved. Prevailing
drought conditions in the spring reduced yields. Green
regrowth also affected yield potential.
10
Normal
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 25. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Perkins, Oklahoma.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
ARC97019
ARC98015
KS3067
ARC2180-1
KS9135
ARC97018
KS3068
Wichita
DSV 05100
Jetton
ARC98007
KS7436
KS9124
KS2185
KS3254
Baldur
Virginia
KS3074
DKW13-62
Kronos
Casino
KS3018
Sumner
KS2064
DSV 05104
DSV 05102
VSX-2
DSV 05101
KS3350
DSV 05103
Abilene
TCI Exp 983
Rasmus
DKW13-86
Plainsman
Ceres
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
442
377
338
326
292
287
283
283
281
275
271
264
252
244
229
214
212
197
190
189
186
185
170
170
160
160
160
159
157
154
145
143
129
120
111
108
222
34
128
lb/ac
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
99
100
100
99
100
93
100
98
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
100
100
100
93
100
100
100
100
100
100
99
98
95
100
100
100
100
97
93
100
100
99
3
5
%
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
0-10
9.0
9.0
8.7
9.0
8.0
8.0
8.3
9.3
8.3
8.7
8.7
8.3
8.0
8.7
7.7
8.7
8.3
7.3
8.7
7.7
9.0
8.7
8.0
8.0
8.3
8.7
8.3
9.0
7.7
7.7
7.3
8.3
8.0
8.3
6.3
2.3
8.1
8.8
1.2
date
4/9
4/9
4/9
4/9
4/11
4/9
4/10
4/7
4/11
4/7
4/10
4/6
4/12
4/3
4/12
4/11
4/9
4/10
4/13
4/10
4/12
4/6
4/6
4/6
4/12
4/13
4/10
4/9
4/9
4/13
4/5
4/10
4/11
4/9
4/8
4/8
4/9
3
5
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
e
l
e
l
e
l
e
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
e
e
e
l
l
l
l
l
l
e
l
l
l
e
e
Matur- Plant
ity
Height
date
----------------------------------------
in.
37
40
32
37
37
35
33
31
37
33
36
33
36
30
35
35
33
32
37
39
35
30
31
35
38
39
33
35
33
39
33
30
33
33
35
37
35
7
4
t
t
s
t
t
s
s
t
s
t
s
t
s
s
s
t
t
s
s
t
t
s
s
t
s
s
s
s
t
**Regrowth
%
35
42
28
35
27
53
25
22
42
27
33
25
43
22
47
38
47
30
50
25
63
17
28
27
57
57
43
55
43
65
27
38
57
30
37
13
38
35
21
Shatter- Test
ing
Weight
%
----------------------------------------
lb/bu
46.3
46.8
48.9
46.8
42.9
45.4
46.2
42.1
47.7
44.6
40.6
47.9
40.4
47.5
47.2
41.6
46.1
40.3
46.8
45.0
40.5
38.7
43.1
45.3
44.9
44.2
42.7
43.1
42.6
41.6
46.6
42.6
40.5
39.6
37.6
39.7
44.1
11.1
NS
Total
Oil
%
33.6
35.6
35.8
33.5
33.8
34.2
34.6
33.5
35.8
33.2
31.8
36.3
32.7
34.6
34.3
33.0
34.3
32.8
34.9
34.6
31.3
31.1
35.0
32.8
36.0
33.8
33.1
34.5
33.5
33.2
34.0
38.9
34.3
33.2
33.3
34.2
34.0
3.8
2.9
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. **Regrowth was rated as percentage of
plants with new growth at harvest.
30
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Tipton, Oklahoma
Rocky Thacker, Southwest Argonomy Research Station,
Oklahoma State University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/22/05 at 5 lbs/a in 8-in. rows
Harvested:
6/5/2006
Pesticides:
Trifluralin 1 pt/a
Insecticides:
Lorsban and Warrior
Fertility:
32-0-0-36 lbs. N-P-K-S fertilizer in the fall
90-23-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the spring
Previous crop: Wheat
Soil type:
Tipton soil series
Elevation:
1274 ft
Latitude:
34°26N
Comments:
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1 12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
30
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
20
05-06
Moisture was adequate at planting and entries were able to
establish. Extremely dry conditions prevailed through the
remainder of the growing season. Green regrowth affected
yields negatively.
10
Normal
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1 12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 26. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Tipton, Oklahoma.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
ARC98007
KS3068
DSV 05102
ARC98015
DSV 05103
KS3074
KS3067
KS3018
DSV 05101
KS9124
Kronos
KS9135
ARC97019
Ceres
Sumner
DSV 05100
Virginia
KS2064
VSX-2
KS3254
Wichita
TCI Exp 983
Abilene
KS7436
KS2185
Baldur
Jetton
Rasmus
KS3350
ARC97018
ARC2180-1
DKW13-86
Casino
DKW13-62
Plainsman
DSV 05104
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
280
214
199
194
187
182
179
172
168
166
159
151
150
144
141
140
130
124
121
117
111
104
98
90
88
85
80
79
69
65
62
54
30
30
12
-134
60
NS
lb/ac
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
88
88
87
88
83
87
85
80
88
82
85
88
88
82
83
88
85
87
88
87
87
90
87
85
90
83
83
83
88
87
88
88
85
80
88
82
86
4
6
%
----------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
0-10
9.3
8.0
7.7
8.0
7.3
8.3
8.7
8.3
8.3
7.7
6.3
8.3
8.7
1.0
6.7
9.3
7.7
7.7
8.0
7.3
8.3
8.7
6.3
7.0
9.0
7.7
8.0
7.0
8.3
8.3
9.0
8.3
8.3
8.0
7.3
8.3
7.8
10.3
1.3
50%
Bloom
date
4/3
4/8
4/8
4/7
4/10
4/7
4/8
3/27
4/6
4/12
4/6
4/7
4/5
4/5
4/1
4/3
4/3
4/6
4/4
4/14
4/6
4/1
4/4
4/4
4/3
4/6
4/7
4/4
4/4
4/6
4/6
4/7
4/11
4/15
4/16
4/13
4/4
3
5
e
l
e
l
e
l
l
l
l
Matur- Plant
ity
Height
date
----------------------------------------
in.
39
35
37
39
39
37
37
36
41
37
37
36
39
38
36
33
41
35
36
35
39
36
37
38
34
39
35
35
36
34
35
37
37
37
37
35
37
10
NS
Lodg- Shatter- Test
ing
ing
Weight
%
----------------------------------------
%
----------------------------------------
lb/bu
41.7
44.1
44.0
40.6
39.1
41.5
43.9
40.3
40.3
45.8
42.5
38.0
41.8
44.1
37.7
44.3
34.8
41.4
37.3
45.3
43.0
46.8
43.8
33.1
44.8
35.7
41.1
35.7
36.2
-30.9
-31.7
---40.7
11.9
NS
Total
Oil
%
32.2
32.1
30.3
31.3
32.2
30.5
32.3
32.2
31.3
34.1
32.4
31.8
32.3
32.5
32.1
31.1
29.8
32.3
31.5
31.7
32.5
32.4
30.3
32.0
29.5
34.5
32.4
30.0
33.2
31.4
31.5
30.7
32.0
31.8
31.1
32.8
31.8
3.2
2.5
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest
31
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Chillicothe, Texas
David Bordovsky & Gregory Church, Agricultural Research
and Extension Center, Texas A&M University
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 9/19/05 at 5 lbs/a in 10-in. rows
Harvested:
6/6/2006
Pesticides:
Treflan
Insecticides:
Lorsban at 1 pt/a on 3/10/2006 and 4/19/2006
Irrigation:
2.75 inches on 12/12/2005 and 3/8/2006
Fertility:
60-0-0 lbs. N-P-K fertilizer in the fall
Previous crop: Fallow
Soil type:
Abilene clay loam
Elevation:
1401 ft
Latitude:
34°11N
Comments:
Challenging year because of dry weather and multiple aphid
pressures in the spring.
60
40
20
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1 12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
30
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
20
05-06
10
Normal
plant
bloom
harvest
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
Table 27. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Chillicothe, Texas.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
KS7436
DSV 05103
ARC97019
ARC97018
KS3350
Virginia
DSV 05101
ARC98007
KS 3067
Sumner
VSX-2
Jetton
KS3068
Baldur
DSV 05102
KS9135
KS2185
ARC98015
KS3074
DKW13-62
DSV 05104
Kronos
TCI 983
DKW13-86
ARC2180-1
KS2064
KS3018
KS3254
Wichita
KS9124
Rasmus
Ceres
DSV 05100
Plainsman
Abilene
Casino
Mean
CV (%)
LSD (0.05)
871
784
760
729
701
696
695
690
688
682
671
624
620
601
593
577
574
559
543
538
531
530
528
501
486
486
479
472
466
449
415
411
370
353
344
299
564
25
232
lb/ac
1340
----1215
---1082
1253
1265
-1194
-1022
1361
--1088
-1166
-1198
-1076
--1265
1129
1052
852
-835
982
-1078
---
1402
----1263
---1472
1608
1665
---1341
---1020
---1278
----1378
1225
1154
970
-982
1036
609
1114
---
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
---
%
100
----100
---100
100
100
-100
-100
100
--100
-100
-100
-100
--100
100
100
100
-100
100
-100
---
100
----100
---100
99
99
---100
---94
---99
----100
100
98
99
-99
99
100
98
---
0-10
5.0
5.7
6.3
6.7
6.7
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.3
6.7
7.3
6.7
7.7
6.7
6.3
6.7
6.3
7.3
6.3
7.0
6.7
4.7
7.7
7.0
7.3
7.0
7.0
6.3
7.0
6.7
6.3
2.3
6.3
6.3
5.7
6.3
6.5
10.9
1.2
50%
Bloom
date
3/27
4/3
4/1
3/22
3/28
3/28
4/1
3/26
4/2
3/27
3/29
3/28
4/2
3/26
4/1
4/2
3/27
3/30
4/3
4/5
4/3
4/2
3/22
3/31
3/28
4/1
3/29
4/3
4/1
4/2
3/26
4/1
3/29
4/5
4/1
4/4
3/30
2
3
l
e
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
e
l
l
l
l
Matur- Plant
Height
ity
date
----------------------------------------
in.
34
42
43
43
40
37
40
45
41
34
38
37
40
44
43
39
35
46
38
43
42
42
38
37
41
40
35
40
38
41
37
36
43
39
36
39
40
9
6
s
t
t
st
s
st
t
t
s
s
s
st
t
t
s
s
t
s
t
t
t
s
s
t
st
s
st
s
t
s
s
t
s
s
s
st
Lodg- Shatter- Test
Weight
ing
ing
%
----------------------------------------
%
0.0
0.0
1.0
6.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
6.0
1.3
4.3
2.7
2.0
1.7
10.0
0.0
3.3
1.0
4.3
2.0
0.3
0.0
3.3
0.3
1.7
3.0
6.7
1.3
2.0
1.0
1.7
3.0
0.3
0.0
0.3
2.3
1.3
2.0
103
3.5
lb/bu
----------------------------------------
Total
Oil
%
----------------------------------------
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically different
from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data from 2005
and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006.
32
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Lingle, Wyoming
James Krall & Jerry Nachtman, University of Wyoming
100
Temperature-F
80
Planted on 8/24/05 at 5 lbs/a in 14-in rows.
Harvested:
7/14/2006
Pesticides:
Trifluralin
Insecticides:
None
Irrigation:
Lateral sprinkler
Fertility:
50-30-0-20 lbs. N-P-K-S fertilizer in the fall
Previous crop: Winter wheat
Soil type:
Abilene clay loam
Elevation:
4180 ft
Latitude:
42°7N
Comments:
No lodging, shattering, or bird damage observed.
60
40
20
plant
bloom
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
6/1
7/1
6/1
7/1
20
Cumulative
Precipitation-in.
15
10
Normal
5
05-06
plant
bloom
0
7/1
8/1
9/1
10/1
11/1
12/1
1/1
2/1
3/1
4/1
5/1
Table 28. Results from the 2006 National Winter Canola Variety Trial at Lingle, Wyoming.
Yield
Winter Survival
Line
2006
*2yr
3yr
2006
2yr
3yr
Fall
Stand
50%
Bloom
DSV 05102
KS3254
ARC97018
KS9135
KS3068
KS3074
ARC2180-1
Baldur
Virginia
Abilene
DSV 05100
Kronos
Casino
Jetton
KS9124
Wichita
Rasmus
KS2064
ARC98007
KS3018
KS3067
DSV 05103
Sumner
VSX-2
ARC97019
DSV 05101
TCI Exp 983
KS7436
Plainsman
KS3350
KS2185
Ceres
ARC98015
DSV 05104
Mean
CV (%)
2029
1990
1915
1881
1798
1790
1755
1754
1751
1695
1626
1588
1583
1562
1557
1489
1485
1479
1460
1458
1435
1391
1350
1298
1266
1248
1197
1192
1183
1175
1146
1094
1059
811
1485
26
lb/ac
---1459
--1205
1329
1220
1254
-1284
1283
1074
1285
1166
1164
--1157
--1082
984
---1066
1084
--1148
--1155
--
---1503
----1233
1152
-1317
958
1032
1262
1237
999
-----957
744
---1041
1005
--950
--1086
--
94
99
99
99
98
100
99
99
99
99
99
99
98
97
99
100
98
97
93
95
100
93
100
99
98
96
99
92
99
100
98
100
97
93
98
3
%
---100
--99
100
100
100
-100
99
99
99
100
99
--97
--100
100
---89
86
--76
--88
--
---94
----93
77
-99
75
93
94
97
74
-----84
89
---88
79
--64
--83
--
0-10
7.7
8.1
9.0
9.0
8.5
7.5
8.3
8.5
7.6
6.2
9.3
5.7
7.5
7.3
8.2
6.8
7.2
7.3
9.3
8.7
8.3
7.5
7.7
8.1
8.5
8.9
8.7
5.5
6.5
7.0
7.5
2.0
9.3
8.4
7.7
18.1
date
-------------------------------------
Matur- Plant
Height
ity
date
-------------------------------------
in.
-------------------------------------
Lodg- Shatter- Test
Weight
ing
ing
%
-------------------------------------
%
-------------------------------------
lb/bu
-------------------------------------
Total
Oil
%
40.6
42.2
40.9
39.6
39.3
40.2
39.2
41.5
39.3
38.7
40.3
40.6
40.1
40.3
40.7
39.2
38.9
40.8
41.2
36.9
40.1
38.9
39.4
40.8
40.0
40.6
43.7
40.2
36.4
38.1
38.7
39.0
39.8
40.2
39.9
3.0
LSD (0.05)
628
--5
--2.3
------2.4
Bold - Superior LSD group - Differences among values in bold are not statistically significant at the 0.05 level. e - not statistically
different from earliest, l - not different from latest; s - not different from shortest, t - not different from tallest. *2yr means include data
from 2005 and 2006, 3yr means include data from 2004, 2005, and 2006. 2004 data from Torrington, WY.
33
34
-2
-4
-6
Kronos
Virginia
KS7436
KS9124
Jetton
Baldur
DSV 05100
ARC97018
ARC98007
DSV 05103
KS9135
KS3068
ARC97019
KS3074
KS3254
Sumner
Mean
Ceres
Casino
DSV 05104
TCI Exp 983
DSV 05104
Jetton
Rasmus
Wichita
DKW13-86
Rasmus
Sumner
VSX-2
Figure 3. Great Plains Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2006.
Plainsman
TCI Exp 983
DKW13-62
Ceres
ARC97018
DKW13-62
Virginia
KS2185
Jetton
Mean
Abilene
DSV 05101
ARC98007
DKW13-86
-4
ARC2180-1
-2
TCI Exp 983
0
KS3018
2
Rasmus
4
DSV 05101
ARC98015
DKW13-86
DSV 05103
VSX-2
KS3350
KS2185
VSX-2
KS2064
Mean
ARC97019
DSV 05102
Wichita
Abilene
Kronos
Virginia
KS3254
DSV 05102
KS3067
0
KS2185
2
KS3067
4
ARC2180-1
KS3068
KS3350
Baldur
KS7436
KS9135
Casino
Abilene
ARC98015
KS3018
Sumner
KS2064
KS3074
Plainsman
KS9124
Wichita
Survival - %
6
DSV 05100
KS3018
Ceres
DKW13-62
KS3067
KS7436
KS3068
Baldur
DSV 05102
KS3074
DSV 05101
KS9124
ARC97018
KS3350
KS3254
DSV 05100
Casino
KS2064
DSV 05104
Kronos
ARC2180-1
ARC97019
Plainsman
KS9135
DSV 05103
ARC98007
ARC98015
Height - inches
Yield - lb/a
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
400
200
0
-200
-400
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
6
50% Bloom
4
2
0
-2
-4
Abilene
ARC97018
TCI Exp 983
KS2185
Sumner
KS3018
ARC97019
ARC2180-1
Plainsman
Kronos
KS3350
KS3018
Wichita
Rasmus
Ceres
KS2185
Baldur
KS3350
Jetton
KS9135
Virginia
KS7436
KS2064
Casino
KS2064
Wichita
DSV 05101
Jetton
VSX-2
Abilene
Mean
KS3067
Rasmus
DSV 05103
Kronos
KS9135
DKW13-62
KS9124
Ceres
KS3074
Virginia
DKW13-86
KS3068
KS3068
Mean
ARC2180-1
DSV 05102
VSX-2
KS9124
ARC98007
ARC97018
DSV 05103
Sumner
DKW13-86
Casino
ARC97019
KS3074
DSV 05104
Plainsman
ARC98015
ARC98015
DSV 05101
DSV 05100
KS3254
ARC98007
DSV 05102
DSV 05100
KS3067
KS3254
DSV 05104
KS7436
DKW13-62
Baldur
TCI Exp 983
-6
3.5
3
Total Oil - %
2.5
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
-0.5
-1
-1.5
-2
Note: Values are averages of the differences
between each cultivar and the mean of
Ceres, Jetton, Plainsman, and Wichita for
yield (lbs/a), winter survival (%), height
(inches), and 50% bloom date (days). The
number of observations for each trait is
represented by the different color of the bars
(as shown at right).
0 to 15
Observations
16-30
Observations
More than 30
Observations
Figure 3. Great Plains Winter Canola Summary, 1996-2006 (continued).
35
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Table 29. Sources of Seed for Entries in the National Winter Canola Variety Trial
3
Seed Source
3
Seed Source
Blackleg Rating
Blackleg Rating
2
Entry
1
Type
Herbicide
Tolerance
2
2006
2yr
3yr
Entry
Deutsche Saatveredelung AG (DSV)
Svalöv Weibull
Lippstadt, Germany
S-268 81 Svalöv
Type
Herbicide
Tolerance
2006
2yr
3yr
OP
---
---
---
30
---
---
1
Sweden
DSV 05100
H
DSV 05101
H
DSV 05102
H
DSV 05103
H
DSV 05104
H
-----------
-----------
-----------
-----------
Casino
Technology Crops International
P.O. Box 11925
Winston-Salem, NC 27116
Kansas State University
Throckmorton Plant Sciences Center
TCI Exp 983
OP
---
Manhattan, KS 66506-5501
University of Arkansas
Abilene
OP
---
---
12
13
Department of Crop, Soil, & Environmental Science
KS2064
OP
---
---
20
---
Fayetteville, AR 72701
KS2185
OP
---
---
43
---
KS3018
OP
---
---
43
---
ARC2180-1
OP
---
---
13
---
KS7436
OP
---
---
17
15
ARC98007
OP
---
---
---
---
KS9124
OP
---
---
18
---
ARC97018
OP
---
---
---
---
KS9135
OP
---
---
13
---
ARC98015
OP
---
---
---
---
KS3067
OP
---
---
---
---
ARC97019
OP
---
---
---
---
KS3068
OP
---
---
---
---
KS3074
OP
---
---
---
---
Virginia State University
KS3254
OP
---
---
---
---
Agricultural Experiment Station
KS3350
OP
---
---
---
---
Petersburg, VA 23806
Plainsman
OP
---
---
17
22
Sumner
OP
SU
---
10
---
Virginia
OP
---
---
10
13
Wichita
OP
---
---
14
12
VSX-2
OP
---
---
12
---
Monsanto
800 North Lindberg Bvd.
1
St. Louis, MO 63167
2
DKW13-62
OP
RR
---
---
---
DKW13-86
OP
RR
---
---
---
---
3
Hans-Georg Lembke KG
Hohenlieth Germany D-24363 Holtsee
H
---
---
10
Ceres
OP
---
---
19
13
Jetton
OP
---
---
12
12
Kronos
H
---
---
20
---
Rasmus
OP
---
---
19
---
SU = sulfonylurea, RR = glyphosate
Blackleg rated as total percentage of plants killed by
blackleg or having basal stem canker. Data collected at
Griffin, GA by D.V. Phillips and D. Spradlin. Nurseries were
located on or adjacent to fields infected with Phoma blackleg
the previous season. 2yr means include data from 2004 and
2005; 3yr means include data from 2003, 2004, and 2005.
Norddeutche Pflanzenzucht (NPZ)
Baldur
OP = open pollinated, H = hybrid.
36
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service
has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu.
Senior Authors
Michael Stamm, Dept. of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan
& Oklahoma State University, Stillwater
Cynthia La Barge, Dept. of Agronomy, Kansas State University, Manhattan
Other Contributors
Robert Aiken, KSU Northwest Research-Extension Center, Colby
Richard Auld, Texas Tech University, Lubbock
Robert Bacon & Jim Kelly, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
Brian Baldwin, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State
David Baltensperger & Glen Frickel, University of Nebraska, Scottsbluff
Brent Bean, Texas A&M University, West Amarillo
Abdel Berrada, Colorado State University, Rocky Ford
Harbans Bhardwaj, Virginia State University, Petersburg
David Bordovsky & Gregory Church, Texas A&M University, Chillicothe
Brian Caldbeck, Miles Enterprises, Russellville
Ernst Cebert, Alabama A&M University, Normal
Shawn Conley & Ellsworth Christmas, Purdue University, West Lafayette
Russell Freed, Michigan State University, East Lansing
William Heer & Victor Martin, KSU South Central Experiment Field, Hutchinson
Don Hooper, Oklahoma State University, Chickasha
Duane Johnson, Montana State University, Kalispell
Jerry Johnson, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins
Rick Kochenower, Oklahoma State University, Goodwell
James Krall & Jerry Nachtman, University of Wyoming, Lingle
John Lamle, Gene McVey, & Van Schuermann, Johnston Seed Company, Enid
Kevin Larson, Colorado State University, Walsh
Edwin Lentz, The Ohio State University, Findlay
James Long & Kelly Kusel, KSU Southeast Agricultural Research Center, Parsons
Howard Mason, University of Missouri, Columbia
Rick Matheson, Oklahoma State University, Perkins
Kent McKay, North Dakota State University, Minot
Lenis Nelson, University of Nebraska, Lincoln
Calvin Pearson, Colorado State University, Fruita
Paul Porter & Dave LeGare, University of Minnesota, St. Paul
Charlie Rife, Blue Sun Biodiesel, Torrington
Greg Roth & Mary Carol Frier, Pennsylvania State University, State College
Paul Rose, University of Georgia, Griffin
Mark Stack, Colorado State University, Yellowjacket
Ray Sidwell, Oklahoma State University, Lahoma
Michael Schmidt & Jim Klein, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
David Starner, Virginia Tech University, Orange
Rocky Thacker, Oklahoma State University, Tipton
Kim Tungate & Amber Moore, North Carolina State University, Raleigh
Merle Witt, KSU Southwest Research-Extension Center, Garden City
Contents of this publication may be freely reproduced for educational purposes. All other rights reserved. In each case,
give credit to the author(s), name of the work, Kansas State University, and the date the work was published.
This Report of Progress was edited, designed, and printed by the Department of Communications
at Kansas State University
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, Manhattan 66506
SRP 973
April 2007
Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
These materials may be available in alternative formats.
950