Measurements of φ3/γ Anton POLUEKTOV Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 1 CKM matrix and φ3/γ quark Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa quark mixing matrix (CKM): iφ 3 ~e A ( i ) Vud Vus Vub 1 / 2 2 2 V Vcd Vcs Vcb 1 / 2 A V V V A3 (1 i ) A2 1 td ts tb 2 3 i g Vij quark i m W j W g Vij* j CKM unitarity leads to triangle in complex plane: ∗ i=1,k=3: V ub V ud V ∗cb V cdV ∗tb V td=0 ≃ FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 V ∗ub V ud ∗ ub V V ud 1 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ V ∗tb V td ∗ ub V V ud =0 2 Constraints on CKM parameters Direct angle measurements (CKMfitter world averages, 2007): • φ1/β = 21.5 ± 1.0º (B→J/ψK0) • φ2/α = 88 ± 6º (B→ρρ) • φ3/γ = 77 ± 30º (B→DK) [BaBar (SLAC) , Belle (KEK)] Good agreement so far. Trees FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 Loops A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 3 KEKB and Belle detector KEKB Collider 3.5 GeV e+ & 8 GeV e– beams 3 km circumference, 11 mrad crossing angle L = 1.7 x 1034 cm–2s–1 (world record) ∫ L dt ~ 820 fb–1 @ Υ(4S)+off(~10%) FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 4 PEP-II and BaBar detector Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) 1.5T magnet e + Drift Chamber (DCH) e ­ Instrumented Flux Return (IFR) Electromagnetic Calorimeter (EMC) Detector of Internally Reflected Cherenkov Light (DIRC) 3.1 GeV e+ & 9 GeV e– beams L = 1.2 x 1034 cm–2s–1 ∫ L dt = 530 fb–1 @ Υ(4S)+off (~10%) FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 5 B+→D0K+ decay CP violation enters the Standard Model as a complex phase ⇒ only observable in the interference. To measure φ3/γ, use interference on Vub and Vcb amplitudes: B– D0K–: B– D0K– : A1 ~ VcbVus* ~ A3 A 2 ~VubVcs* ~Aλ 3(ρ i ) ~ e i3 Amplitudes interfere if D0 and D0 decay into the same final state Relative phase: 3 (B–→DK–), 3 (B+→DK+) 0 〉 =∣D0 〉 r B ei ∣D0 〉 ∣D includes weak (φ3/γ) and strong (δ) phase. Magnitude of CP violation is determined by the ratio of the two amplitudes: 0 rB A ( B D K ) / A ( B D 0 K ) Vub* Vcs Vcb* Vus [color supp ] ~ 0.1 Precision of γ/φ3 depends on rB: σ(φ3/γ) ~ 1/rB. Measuring rB is also essential. FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 6 Methods of φ3/γ measurement ● Based on B→DK. Different D0 modes can be used: – GLW (CP eigenstates: D0→ππ, KK, Kφ, Kω) Belle: 275M BB pairs (B→DCPK, B→D*CPK: PRD 73 051106 (2006)) BaBar: 382M BB pairs (B→DCPK: arXiv:0802.4052, B→D*K: Hot topic, B→DCPK*: PRD 72 071103 (2005)) – ADS (CF and DCS states: D0→Kπ, Kππ) Belle: 657M BB pairs (B→DK: arXiv:0804:2063) BaBar: 232M BB pairs (B→DK, B→D*K, B→DK* with D→Kπ: PRD 72 032004 (2005)) – Dalitz (multibody states: D0→Kππ, KKK, πππ) Belle: 657M BB pairs (B→DK, B→D*K with D*→Dπ0, D0→KSπ+π-: arXiv:0803.3375) BaBar: 382M BB pairs (B→DK, B→D*K with D*→Dπ0,Dγ, D0→KSπ+π-,KSK+K-: arXiv:0804.2089) 371M BB pairs (B0→D0K*0: Moriond EW 2008) ● Based on B0 decays (measurement of 2φ1+φ3 ) Belle: 386M BB pairs (B→D*π partial, B→D(*)π full rec.: PRD 73 092003 (2006)) BaBar: 232M BB pairs (B→D*π partial: PRD 71 112003 (2005), B→D(*)π, Dρ full rec.: PRD 73 111101 (2006)) 347M BB pairs (B→DKπ time-dependent Dalitz: arXiv:0712.3469) FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 7 GLW method M. Gronau, D. London, D. Wyler PLB 253, 483 (1991); PLB 265, 172 (1991) СР eigenstate of D-meson is used (DCP). CP-even: D1 →K+K–, π+ π –, Double ratio R C P± = CP-odd: D2 → KS π0, KS ω, KS φ, KSη… Br B D C P± K / Br B D C P± 0 0 Br B D K / Br B D 2 =1r B2r B cos ' cos Br B D C P± K −Br B D C P± 2r B sin ' sin = СР-asymmetry: A C P± = Br B D C P± K Br B D C P± R C P± for D1 A1,2 have opposite signs for D2 Alternative variables: x± =r B cos±= R 1 A 1− R2 1 A 2 = 1 4 R R2−2 2 r B= 1 2 FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 8 BaBar: GLW method (B→DK) BaBar collaboration, 382M BB pairs [arXiv: 0802:4052] CP-even modes: DCP+→K+K–, π+ π – CP-odd modes : DCP−→KS π0, KS ω ● Cut on mES, event shape variables ● ΔE and PID variable included into likelihood ACP+ +0.27 ± 0.09 ± 0.04 ACP- −0.09 ± 0.09 ± 0.02 RCP+ 1.06 ± 0.10 ± 0.05 RCP- 1.03 ± 0.10 ± 0.05 The same result expressed in Cartesian variables: x+ −0.09 ± 0.05± 0.02 x− +0.10 ± 0.05 ± 0.03 r2 0.05 ± 0.07 ± 0.03 x± precision comparable to Dalitz analysis FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 9 * BaBar: GLW method (B→D K) BaBar collaboration, 382M BB pairs, B→D*K with D*→Dπ and D*→Dγ CP-even modes: DCP+→K+K–, π+ π – New! Preliminary CP-odd modes : DCP−→KS π0, KS ω, KS ϕ ● Cut on mES, event shape variables ● ΔE and PID variable included into likelihood D*→Dπ and D*→Dγ have strong phase difference exactly 180° ⇒ Can combine both ACP+ −0.11 ± 0.09 ± 0.01 ACP- +0.06 ± 0.10 ± 0.02 RCP+ 1.31 ± 0.13 ± 0.03 RCP- 1.10 ± 0.12 ± 0.04 See als o BaBar ho topic ta t lk The same result expressed in Cartesian variables: x+* +0.09 ± 0.07 ± 0.01 x−* −0.02 ± 0.06 ± 0.01 r*2 0.22 ± 0.10 ± 0.03 (KS ϕ excluded to allow comparison with Dalitz) FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 10 ADS method D. Atwood, I. Dunietz and A. Soni, PRL 78, 3357 (1997) Enhance magnitude of CP violation by using Doubly Cabibbo-suppressed D decays e.g. B−→[K+π−]D K−: Observable: R ADS = Br B D supp K 2 2 =r B r D 2r B r D cos 3 cos Br B D fav K where ≡ B D ∣ ∣ A D 0 K − r D= =0.0578±0.0008 0 − A D K FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 11 Belle: ADS method Belle collaboration, 657M BB pairs [arXiv: 0804:2063, submitted to PRD(RC)] B−→[K+π−]D K− (suppressed) and B−→[K–π+]D K− (favored) modes are selected. ● ● Cut on Mbc, MD, PID likelihood, event shape B→DsuppK B→DfavK Fit ΔE to extract signal yield 2.0 −3 R ADS =8.06.3 −5.7 −2.8 ×10 CP asymmetry: A ADS=−0.130.98 −0.88 ±0.26 rB<0.19 at 90% CL (with the conservative assumption cos φ3 cos δ = –1) 11 9 ° Using CLEO measurement =22−12 −11 [arXiv: 0802:2268] and φ3,δB measurements from Dalitz analysis, See talk by D avid As tighter rB constraint can be obtained. ne on Frid ay FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 r A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 12 Dalitz analysis method A. Giri, Yu. Grossman, A. Soffer, J. Zupan, PRD 68, 054018 (2003) A. Bondar, Proc. of Belle Dalitz analysis meeting, 24-26 Sep 2002. 0 〉 =∣D0 〉 r B ei ∣D0 〉 ∣D Using 3-body final state, identical for D0 and D0: Ksπ+π-. Dalitz distribution density: ∣A D 2 K S m 2 − K S ,m d m2K S , m2K 2 S − ∝∣ AD∣ dm2K S dm2K S − 2 ∣ (assuming СР-conservation in D0 decays) 2 2 If A D mK ,mK is known, parameters 3 / ,r B , are obtained from the fit to Dalitz distributions of D→Ksπ+π– from B±→DK± decays S − S Need to know a complex form of the D0 decay amplitude, but only |A|2 is obtained from D*→Dπ ⇒ Need to use model description, model uncertainty as a result FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 13 Belle Dalitz: D0→KSπ+π− amplitude [preliminary] Belle collaboration, 657M BB pairs [arXiv: 0803:3375] 2 M Ksπ – (GeV 2 ) Isobar model is used as a baseline. K-matrix for systematics test. M K2 (GeV 2 ) M K2 (GeV 2 ) M K2 (GeV 2 ) M 2 (GeV 2) s s σ1(M=522±6 MeV, Γ=453±10 MeV) σ2(M=1033±7 MeV, Γ=88±7 MeV) FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 s Intermediate state K S σ1 KS ρ(770) KS ω KS f0(980) K S σ2 KS f2(1270) KS f0(1370) KS ρ(1450) K* (892)+π– K*(892)–π+ K*(1410)+π– K*(1410)–π+ K*0(1430)+π– K*0(1430)–π+ K*2(1430)+π– K*2(1430)–π+ K*(1680)+π– K*(1680)–π+ Nonresonant Amplitude Phase, ° 1.56±0.06S 1 (fixed)S 0.0343±0.0008S 0.385±0.006S 0.20±0.02S 1.44±0.04S 1.56±0.12S 0.49±0.08S 1.638±0.010 0.149±0.004 0.65±0.05 0.42±0.04 2.21±0.04S 0.36±0.03S 0.89±0.03S 0.23±0.02S 0.88±0.27 2.1±0.2 2.7±0.3 214±3S 0 (fixed)S 112.0±1.3S 207.3±2.3S 212±12S 342.9±1.7S 110±4S 64±11S 133.2±0.4 325.4±1.3 120±4 253±5 358.9±1.1S 87±4S 314.8±1.1S 275±6S 82±17 130±6 160±5 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 14 ( ) Belle B→D * K Dalitz: signal selection [preliminary] Belle collaboration, 657M BB pairs [arXiv: 0803:3375] B D*K DK B ΔE (GeV) Mbc (GeV/c2) ΔE (GeV) • |ΔE|<30 MeV • |Mksππ–MD| < 11 MeV/c2 • Mbc>5.27 GeV/c2 • 144.9 < ΔM < 145.9 MeV/c2 (B→D*K only) Mbc (GeV/c2) • Continuum rejection variables cosθthr, “virtual calorimeter” Fisher discriminant: |cosθthr| < 0.8, F > −0.7 in (Mbc, ΔE) fit to determine background composition. Whole range is used in Dalitz fit, included into likelihood. 756 events, 29% background (B→DK). 149 events, 20% background (B→D*K, D*→Dπ0). FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 In “clean” signal region (|cosθthr| < 0.8, F > −0.7) A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 15 Belle Dalitz: fit results [preliminary] Fit parameters are x±= rB cos(±φ3+δ) and y±= rB sin(±φ3+δ) Unbinned maximum likelihood fit with event-by-event background treatment (ΔE, Mbc, |cosθthr|, F included into likelihood) B D*K K D B Errors are statistical and experimental systematic. Model error not included. FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 x–= +0.105 ± 0.047 ± 0.011 y–= +0.177 ± 0.060 ± 0.018 x+= –0.107 ± 0.043 ± 0.011 y+= –0.067 ± 0.059 ± 0.018 x–= +0.024 ± 0.140 ± 0.018 y–= –0.243 ± 0.137 ± 0.022 x+= +0.133 ± 0.083 ± 0.018 y+= +0.130 ± 0.120 ± 0.022 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 16 Belle Dalitz: fit results B →DK only: ± ± [preliminary] φ3=81 +13 ° ± 5°(syst) ± 9°(model) −15 B K D B±→D*K± only: φ3=64 ° ± 4°(syst) ± 9°(model) +21 −23 B±→DK±, B±→D*K± combined: +12 φ3=76 −13 ° ± 4°(syst) ± 9°(model) rDK=0.16 ± 0.04 ± 0.01(syst) ± 0.05(model) B D*K rD*K=0.21 ± 0.08 ± 0.01(syst) ± 0.05(model) δDK=136 +14 ° ± 4°(syst) ± 23°(model) −16 +20 δD*K=343 −22 ° ± 4°(syst) ± 23°(model) Model error estimate is the same as in previous analysis. Stat. confidence level of CPV is (1-5.5·10-4) or 3.5σ ! FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 17 BaBar Dalitz: D0→KSπ+π− and KSK+K− modes BaBar collaboration, 383M BB pairs [arXiv: 0804:2089] K * 892 ± , K *0 1430± , K *2 1430 ± , K * 1680 − , 770, 782 , f 2 1270 , K-matrix for ππ S-wave and running phase a0 9800 , 1020 , f 0 1370 , f 2 1270 , a0 14500 , a0 980± , a0 1450+ non-resonant for Kπ S-wave FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 18 BaBar Dalitz: signal selection 7 modes used: B→DK, B→D*K with D*→Dπ0 and Dγ, B→DK* D0→KSπ+π- and KSK+K- (except for B→DK*) D0→KSK+K- D0→KSπ+π- B± D K ± B ± [ D 0 ] D K ± ∗ B ± [ D ]D K ± ∗ B ± D [ K S ± ]K ∗ 133±15 ev 129±16 ev 600±31 ev 112±13 ev FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 32±7 ev 118±18 ev 21±7 ev A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 19 BaBar Dalitz: fit results Fit results expressed in Cartesian coordinates x±= rB cos(±γ+δ), y±= rB sin(±γ+δ) B DK ± B D K ± ± B→ D 0K ∗ ± B→ D*0K B± D K ∗ B→ D 0K* x− y− +0.090 ± 0.043 ± 0.015 ± 0.011 −0.111 ± 0.069 ± 0.014 ± 0.004 +0.115 ± 0.138 ± 0.039 ± 0.014 x+ −0.067 ± 0.043 ± 0.014 ± 0.011 +0.137 ± 0.068 ± 0.014 ± 0.005 −0.113 ± 0.107 ± 0.028 ± 0.018 y+ −0.015 ± 0.055 ± 0.006 ± 0.008 +0.080 ± 0.102 ± 0.010 ± 0.012 +0.125 ± 0.139 ± 0.051 ± 0.010 +0.053 ± 0.056 ± 0.007 ± 0.015 −0.051 ± 0.080 ± 0.009 ± 0.010 +0.226 ± 0.142 ± 0.058 ± 0.011 Statistical Systematic FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 D0 model A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 20 BaBar Dalitz: combined result ° =7623 −24 ±5±5 30 −28 =63 ° ±8±7 (D →KSπ π modes only) 0 + - CPV significnce is 3.0σ FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 r B= 0.086± 0.035±0.010± 0.011 r B= 0.135±0.051±0.011± 0.005 ∗ 0.088 ± − 0.105 r s= 0.163 0.037± 0.021 28 ° B =109−31±4±7 ∗ 28 ° B =−63−30±5±4 43 ° s=104−41±17±5 Accounts for possible non-resonant B→DKπ A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 21 Dalitz analisys: model-independent way Model-independent way: obtain D0 decay strong phase from ψ(3770)→DD data PB (m2 , m2 ) | f D ( x iy ) f D |2 PD rB2 PD 2 PD PD [ xC y S ] PD (m2 , m2 ) | f D (m2 , m2 ) |2 PD (m , m ) | f D (m , m ) | 2 2 2 2 2 x rB cos( 3 ) y rB sin( 3 ) C (m2 , m2 ) cos( D (m2 , m2 ) D (m2 , m2 )) S (m2 , m2 ) sin( D (m2 , m2 ) D (m2 , m2 )) Free parameters Unknown, can be obtained from charm data at ψ(3770): See Bru talk tom ce Ya by orr bsle ow y PCP (m2 , m2 ) | f D f D |2 PD PD 2 PD PD C DCP→KSπ+π–: ψ(3770)→(KSπ π )D (KSπ π )D : + – + – PCorr ( m2 , m2 , m2 , m2 ) | f D f D f D f D |2 PD PD PD PD 2 PD PD PD PD (CC SS ) Contribution to φ3/γ error: ~5° with CLEO data (but this is stat. error, more reliable than current model uncertainty) ~1° with BES data (20 fb-1) FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 22 Techniques using neutral B decays (BaBar) Decay Both amplitudes are color-suppressed, rB ~0.4 B0D0K*0: ° 0 ∗0 /3 =162±56 , r D K 0.5590% Decay B0 D∓ K 0 :± BaBar collaboration, 347M BB pairs [arXiv: 0712:3469] Use B flavor tag, perform time-dependent Dalitz plot analysis. Sensitive to 2β+γ 0 Interference between B D ∗∗0 0 0 − ∗ K S (b→u and b→c) and B D K (b→c) ° 2 /213=83±53±20 FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 23 World average (UTfit) UTfit averages including all results available today γ/φ3=81±13° rDK=0.098±0.017 FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 [ provided by V. Sordini ] rD*K=0.092±0.038 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ rDK*=0.13±0.09 24 Conclusion ● Many new measurements related to φ3/γ appeared in 2008: – BaBar GLW, Belle ADS updates, – Belle Dalitz update with D0→KSπ+π- – BaBar Dalitz update with D0→KSπ+π- and new D0→KSK+K-. ● Combining all B-factory results, there is strong evidence of CP violation in B→DK. ● rB is shown to be significantly non-zero. Can predict future sensitivity with confidence. ● φ3/γ statistical precision is now comparable to D0 model uncertainty. Model-independent Dalitz analysis using charm data (CLEO) will allow to obtain a more reliable result. FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 25 B-meson selection In Υ(4S) decays, pairs of B-mesons are produced (near BB threshold) E B E cm / 2, small CM momentum (300 MeV/c) Selection variables: • CM energy difference: E E i ( E cm / 2) B-meson “beam-constrained mass” Mbc (Belle) or “energy substituted mass” MES (BaBar): M bc ( E cm / 2) 2 ( pi ) 2 • Event shape (e+e-bb and e+e-uu,dd,ss,cc separation): e+e-uu,dd,ss,cc FPCP, Taiwan. May 5, 2008 e+e-bb A. Poluektov. Measurements of φ3/γ 26