Enclosure 3A - Project Summary Form NATIONAL FIRE PLAN COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE AND WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE PROJECTS Application for Wildland Urban Interface Fuels / Education and Prevention / Community Planning for Fire Protection Projects Applicant Applicant/Organization: Pend Oreille Conservation District Phone: FAX: Email: (509) 447-4217 (509) 447-0371 charlotte@pocd.org Address (Street or P. O. Box, City, State, Zip): PO Box 280 Project Coordinator Project Coordinator (Name and Title): Darcy Kern, Firewise Education Coordinator Organization/Jurisdiction: Pend Oreille County Washington Phone: FAX: Email: (509) 447-4217 (509) 447-0371 darcy@pocd.org Project Information Project Title: Northeast Washington WildFire Reduction Team Proposed Project Start Date: January 1, 2004 Proposed Project End Date: December 31, 2005 Federal Funding Request: 25,000 Total Project Funding: 33,760 Are you submitting multiple projects? If so, please explain and prioritize: yes. Dry Hydrants in the Lake in the Woods, and other identified locations prioritized in the county’s fire plan, K-12 fire prevention education Brief Project Description: This proposal incorporates Dry Hydrant development into the community fire plan and fire prevention education for the purpose of strengthening fire protection efforts in Pend Oreille (Pond-eray) County. The project will reduce devastating fires in the Wildland/urban interface by strategically installing dry hydrants in vulnerable areas within Pend Oreille County. The intent will be to provide access to adequate water supplies in the Wildland Urban Interface. The entire County’s Fire Districts have pledged their support with equipment and time towards this proposal. The landowners and the environment will benefit by the reduced response time which will lessen the effects of wildland fire on the community and the natural resources. The project has community partnerships with the schools, state foresters, and the volunteer fire fighters by incorporating K-12 fire education into the county's education plan. Educational activities are directed towards the importance of good access and visible road signs, fuels reduction around family homes with defensible fire plans and identifying emergency personnel in the community. Links to local information will be incorporated into the Pend Oreille Conservation District Web Site. Project Location (latitude/longitude if applicable): County: Congressional District: Pend Oreille County Pend Oreille County 5 Project Type: Check appropriate project type. More than one type may be checked. If only Box (4) is checked, use Enclosure 4. (1) (2) Wildland Urban Interface Fuels Project Wildland Urban Interface Education and Prevention Project (3) (4) Community Planning for Fire Protection Project Fuels Utilization and Marketing Project If the applicant is an unincorporated area, define the geographic area being represented: Enclosure 3B (Page 1 of 3) - Project Narrative Description Applications for funding must include a narrative response that describes the proposal. Please do not submit responses longer than one page, single space, 12-pitch font. Describe project including, but not limited to: project location Address these project implementation items as anticipated outcomes applicable: measures and reporting interagency partners project relationship to community or natural landscape fire plans project time frames and income specify types of activities and equipment used amount or extent of actions (acres, number of homes, etc) environmental, cultural and historical resource requirements Response: Pend Oreille (Pond-eray) County is a rural county situated in northeastern Washington containing 90% forestland. Historically, when wildfires occurred they were contained mostly to the public lands or large industrial forest lands and fire suppression was initiated to minimize damage to these lands. Much of the harvested private land in this forgotten part of eastern Washington was subject to the forest practice rules of the past, the mature Ponderosa Pine and Western Larch stands were hygraded and diameter cuts were common practice. This led to subdividing and rural development as land converted into residential uses. The unmanaged land is typically void of any large trees and open to noxious weeds and Pend Oreille Conservation District (POCD) has responded by working with small acreage landowners to implement best management practices on their property. Unfortunately, most landowners find landscaping 5- 10 acres for fire prevention is overwhelming and replacement stands of Lodgepole Pine now dominate much of the landscape in thick unproductive acreages increasing fire risk in the wildland/urban interface. By completing the installation of strategically placed dry hydrants new sources of fire protection can be incorporated into Pend Oreille County Fire District's rural fire protection plan. A dry hydrant is a non-pressurized pipe permanently installed in existing lakes, ponds or streams that provides a means of suction supply of water to a tank truck. The “Dry Hydrant Fire Fighting Concept” includes not only the strategic location of the hydrant itself, but also the equipment and trained personnel to use it efficiently. All three of these components are essential for an effective dry hydrant system. The design for a dry hydrant was of high priority to the conservation district and the Natural Resource Conservation Service has completed the standard engineered design. The Conservation District, Fire District #3 and the County completed three installations in 2002 which are functioning perfectly. This project includes the installation of at least three more dry hydrants. The Natural Resource Conservation Service has already completed an engineered design this winter for the highest priority location at Lake in the Woods located near the border of Idaho and Washington. Other locations have been identified and ranked by the local fire districts. Each hydrant was ranked according to its location to the wildland/urban interface and the water source. Within this project an element of education will assist the goals of fire prevention needed for upcoming fire seasons by incorporating firewise management techniques into the northeast area Envirothon event for high school students. The district will sponsor a week long event during Fire Prevention Week with all the county fire districts, state and federal forest managers, WSU and others. Development of these activities and events will be included into the Conservation District's annual and long range plan. Previous firewise activities have been incorporated into the district's 6th grade conservation days, Pend Oreille Waterfestival and Natural Resource Day which have been very effective in providing students with hands-on activities while learning about fire behavior as a tool as well as learning its dangers. The five days of Fire Prevention Week will bring together five agencies and 1000 Pend Oreille County students from pre-school to sixth grade together for intensive fire prevention instruction. Smokey Bear will lead students on a stroll through a mock defensible space adjacent to an unsafe landscape. Visual aids to encourage discussion about the importance of firewising one's property will be used before they stop at the entrance to the "Edith House" (which exhibits exit drills in the home) Fireman outfitted in personal protection equipment (PPE) will explain the importance of recognizing emergency personnel during hazardous conditions while other firemen demonstrate the "Stop, Drop, and Roll" technique. Introducing fire safety/fire behavior to students will provide educational opportunities for students to share what they have learned with their parents by providing a copy of a firewise discussion paper for homework. Follow-up visits to the schools by the Conservation and Fire Districts to test the student's knowledge will reinforce the message. Enclosure 3B (Page 2 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria Applications for funding must include narrative responses that address the following four criteria. Within each criterion, subcriteria are listed in descending order of importance. Limit your responses to the areas provided. 1. Reducing Fire Risk. (40 points)) A. Describe how the proposal promotes reduction of risk in high hazard areas or communities, or natural landscapes. B. Describe how the proposed project benefits resources on federal land or adjacent non-federal land, or how it protects the safety of communities. C. To what extent does the project implement or create a cooperative (1) fuels treatment plan or (2) community fire strategy (include evidence of the plan if it already exists)? D. Explain to what extent the affected community or proponent has been involved or plans to involve the affected community in a qualified fuels education program (e.g., FIREWISE). E. Explain how the proposal (1) leads to, enhances or restores a local fire-adapted ecosystem, and/or (2) mitigates or leads to the mitigation of hazardous fuel conditions. F. How will the proposed treatments or programs be maintained in future years? Response The dry hydrants will be used by Volunteer Fire Districts and state/federal fire personnel. The need is great due to the lack of access to open water in the proposed hydrant locations. Pend Oreille Conservation District (POCD) has identified dry hydrant development and forest protection as a high priority in their annual plan for the past two years. Three dry hydrants were installed previously in the southwest part of the county towards the city of Spokane. The concept is not new and many fire departments have successfully used dry hydrants for a number of years, but their use has not been widespread until recently. The installation, maintenance and physical aspect of the dry hydrant project will include the volunteer Fire Districts, POCD volunteers, PO County, staff will be supervised by the Natural Resource Conservation Service. The county is committed to maintenance and operation. The proposal will also help facilitate a workshop to train fire volunteers on proper operation and maintenance of the fire truck unit and the dry hydrants. The District will partner with WSU to incorporate training provided at the Fire Wise Workshops and by Fire Safe Spokane to educate the local community about creating defensible areas around their home-sites and cabins. The POCD has a web site and sends out a summer newsletter to over 1000 landowners and has staff and local contacts to implement the education portion of the proposal. 2. Increasing local capacity. (30 points) A. How would the proposal improve or lead to the improvement of the local economy in terms of jobs and sustainable economic activity? How many jobs are expected to be created or retained and for how long (please distinguish between essentially yearround and seasonal jobs)? How will this proposal link to toher projects (or proposed projects) to create year-round jobs? B. To what extent will this project be offered to serve as a model for other communities or natural landscapes? C. Will biomass or forest fuels be utilized; if so, in what manner and how much? Pend Oreille County is the 1st county in Washington to incorporate dry hydrants in their community fire plan. Since last year the conservation district has had numerous phone calls from other communities interested in dry hydrants. We serve as a model in structuring our fire fighting capabilities to minimize the effects of a wildfire knowing that it’s not a matter of if a wildland fire will happen but when. The status of the forests in Pend Oreille County is ripe for wildfire and typical western fire behavior is expected but can be unpredictable. Protecting homes and communities are a priority while using fire as a natural tool is the fire fighting strategy of the future. By the time fire fighting season arrives in Pend Oreille County, the fire fighting resources are long gone to other parts of the western states already on fire. It is this situation which leads the fire districts and emergency personnel to develop plans that rely on fire behavior to save lives and property. This project will include house and road signs for those who cannot afford them and areas with poor access will be identified for future action. Response: Enclosure 3B (Page 3 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria 3. Increasing interagency and intergovernmental coordination. (15 Points) A. Describe how this project implements a local intergovernmental strategy or plan, or creates such a plan. Describe the plan if it already exists. B. Explain the level of cooperation, coordination or strategic planning through a “Local Coordination Group” for wildland fire activities, or among federal, state, tribal, local government and community organizations. List the cooperators (a detailed list of cooperators will be required for projects that are funded). Response: Pend Oreille County is home to many natural resource professionals both working and retired. POCD works closely with local Fire District volunteers, staff at the Newport USFS, WA Dept. of Natural Resources, WSU/Cooperative Extension, Kalispel Tribe, and the NRCS Newport Field Office on a variety of issues, projects and plans. POCD is the lead entity for Watershed Planning under HB 2514 and for Bull Trout Recovery under HB2496. There are many issues surrounding a community Fire Protection Plan like water quality and water quantity, natural resources, air quality, soil erosion and wildlife. POCD is part of the overall coordination team in northeast Washington and has coordinated this proposal so as not to duplicate efforts. POCD has commitment from the community partners, the natural resource agencies and other volunteers supporting this project. (we have letters of support from all of the fire districts, City of Newport, School Superintendents and Principals, and PO County and the Natural Resource Conservation Service has agreed to provide the engineered dry hydrant designs for the remaining locations) 4. Expanding Community Participation. (15 Points) A. To what extent have interested individuals, groups, and communities been provided an opportunity to become informed and involved in this proposal? B. Describe the extent of local support or opposition for the project, including any cost-sharing arrangements. C. What are the environmental, social and educational benefits or concerns of the project? Response: When the Conservation District first researched dry hydrants we had to work with the WA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife to develop fish screens and with the WA Dept. of Ecology to obtain a special exception for water rights. These concerns were addressed and dry hydrants are approved. All of the county’s fire district’s and the county are excited about this project, we have had no objections to this proposal. Both the County and the local fire districts will contribute significant amounts of inkind to the project and are in full support. The schools are excited about the idea of a coordinated event like Fire Prevention Week in October as they can plan other activities around it like biology and water cycle education currently taught when the students return to school in the fall. If the children are excited then they will share their enthusiasm with their parents. The activities planned at the Fire Prevention Week can be somewhat frightening to young children but with a twist of fun thrown in the impact on young minds will be positive. Many of the volunteer firefighters are extremely good with children and are passionate about fire safety and educating the youth about the dangers of wildfire. The POCD Firewise Education Coordinator is deeply committed to the POCD Firewise Program and has the ability to bring all the stakeholders together to complete the project. Property identification signs will provide emergency personnel and fire districts a better chance to evacuate should a wildfire occur. Enclosure 3C - Project Work Form Tasks Time Frame Responsible Party Prepare and submit permits for dry hydrants January 2004-2005 POCD, Fire Districts Collect site and survey information with the Natural Resource Conservation Service Immediately POCD, NRCS Identify driveways and homes that are in need of signage. Provide information to landowners. Develop a list of landowners to prioritize. Install dry hydrants March 2004-2005 POCD, local fire districts July-August 2004-2005 POCD, County, local fire districts Provide information in POCD newsletter, website and at the County Fair August 2004-2005 POCD, NRCS, DNR, WSU Begin planning with partners for the Fire Prevention Week Sept. 2004-2005 POCD, USFS, DNR & local fire districts Sponsor and hold a county-wide Fire October 2004- 2005 Prevention Week in both the south and central part of the county POCD and other participating agencies attending planning sessions Rank landowners needing driveway signs and install July – Oct 2004, 2005 Local Fire Districts Incorporate fire behavior education in the county Envirothon and lobby to include it in the State Envirothon May 2004, 2005 POCD, USFS, NRCS, WSU Prepare Final Report December 2005 POCD Enclosure 3D Project Budget Cost Category Description Personnel Coordinator/POCD Staff Volunteers Subtotal Federal Agency Applicant POCD 9,700 9,700 Partner 1 Partner 2 Total POCD In-Kind Fire Districts PO County 1,200 1,200 5,000 5,000 2,000 2,000 9,700 8,200 17,900 250 250 150 150 800 400 1,200 Fringe Benefits Subtotal Travel Coordinator/POCD Staff Volunteers Subtotal 800 800 Equipment Subtotal Supplies Dry Hydrants Signs, newsletter, website Subtotal Contractual Sign installation Subtotal 10,000 4,000 14,000 160 160 10,000 4,160 14,160 500 500 500 500 25,000 33,760 Other Subtotal Total Costs Project (Program) Income1 (using deductive alternative) 1 Program income is the gross revenue generated by a grant or cooperative agreement supported activity during the life of the grant. Program income can be made by recipients from fees charged for conference or workshop attendance, from rental fees earned from renting out real property or equipment acquired with grant or cooperative agreement funds, or from the sale of commodities or items developed under the grant or cooperative agreement. The use of Program Income during the project period may require prior approval by the granting agency.