Enclosure 3A - Project Summary Form NATIONAL FIRE PLAN COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE AND WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE PROJECTS Application for Wildland Urban Interface Fuels / Education and Prevention / Community Planning for Fire Protection Projects Applicant Applicant/Organization: Yakima County Phone: FAX: (509) 574-2360 (509) 574-2361 Email: Address (Street or P. O. Box, City, State, Zip): 128 North 2nd Street, Room 400, Yakima, WA 98901 Project Coordinator Project Coordinator (Name and Title): Jakki MacLean, Fire Marshal Organization/Jurisdiction: Yakima County Fire Protection Bureau Phone: FAX: Email: (509) 574-2378 (509) 574-2361 Jakki.maclean@co.yakima.wa.us Project Information Project Title: Wildfire Watch Proposed Project Start Date: January 1, 2004 Proposed Project End Date: December 31, 2004 Federal Funding Request: $52,000.00 Total Project Funding: $70,900.00 Are you submitting multiple projects? If so, please explain and prioritize: No Brief Project Description: With the cooperation of local building and fire service professionals, USFS, DNR, Dept. of Defense, and the Yakama Indian Nation, Yakima County adopted and continues to enforce the Urban Wildland Interface Code. Our "Wildfire Watch" project will continue to help reduce fire risk in the interface areas through application of the requirements of the UWIC. In addition to these requirements for new construction, we intend to deliver and expand a number of community education programs to promote our voluntary efforts toward wildfire mitigation. Through the application of Firewise and FireFree programs, we also intend to promote interagency strategic fire plans. Project Location (latitude/longitude if applicable): County: Congressional District: Unincorporated Yakima County Yakima 4th Project Type: Check appropriate project type. More than one type may be checked. If only Box (4) is checked, use Enclosure 4. (1) Wildland Urban Interface Fuels Project (3) Community Planning for Fire Protection Project (2) X Wildland Urban Interface Education and Prevention (4) Fuels Utilization and Marketing Project Project If the applicant is an unincorporated area, define the geographic area being represented: Approx. 4300 square miles with a combination of agricultural, sagebrush, and forested areas. Enclosure 3B (Page 1 of 3) - Project Narrative Description Applications for funding must include a narrative response that describes the proposal. Please do not submit responses longer than one page, single space, 12-pitch font. Describe project including, but not limited to: project location Address these project implementation items as anticipated outcomes applicable: measures and reporting interagency partners project relationship to community or natural landscape fire plans project time frames and income specify types of activities and equipment used amount or extent of actions (acres, number of homes, etc) environmental, cultural and historical resource requirements Yakima County encompasses an area of approximately 4300 square miles, bordered by urbanized areas, Hanford Nuclear Reservation, Yakama Indian Reservation, Yakima Training Center Military Reservation, U. S. Forest Service, and Dept. of Natural Resources land. We have begun to develop a "disaster resistant" community through enforcement of the requirements of the Urban Wildland Interface Code. Working with our Geographic Information Systems, we have been identifying hazardous risk areas and regulating development and construction in those areas. Through application of building standards and materials and approved defensible spaces, we are providing a higher degree of protection to both the citizens who develop in these areas from the threat of wildfire and the wildland areas from the hazards that occur from human habitation. Our goal is to reduce the risk of fires occurring in the Urban Wildland Interface areas and to mitigate the spread and severity should a fire occur. This will be accomplished through education, inspection, and enforcement of proper home siting, construction methods, and landscaping techniques. We will further increase the protection of people and property from wildfires through the ongoing inspection and education for commercial facilities located adjacent to or within the wildland areas. We believe that our program can directly impact approximately 400 structures per year through site assessment, inspection, and investigation. It is also our goal to reach 10,000 individuals through a variety of public awareness programs. Measurement of these goals will be provided through documentation of the number and location of site assessments, inspections, investigations, and plan check activities as well as program delivery. Our partnerships with business and industry, community groups, and the various agencies bordering Yakima County will enhance our ability to protect the environmental resources of our forested areas as well as the cultural integrity of our Native American lands. This proposal is a continuation of efforts we began in April of 2001 with the adoption of the Urban Wildland Interface Code. Efforts will be ongoing, but the target focus dates to accomplish the identified goals for this funding request are January 1, 2004 through December 1, 2004. Response: Enclosure 3B (Page 2 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria Applications for funding must include narrative responses that address the following four criteria. Within each criterion, subcriteria are listed in descending order of importance. Limit your responses to the areas provided. 1. Reducing Fire Risk. (40 points)) A. Describe how the proposal promotes reduction of risk in high hazard areas or communities, or natural landscapes. B. Describe how the proposed project benefits resources on federal land or adjacent non-federal land, or how it protects the safety of communities. C. To what extent does the project implement or create a cooperative (1) fuels treatment plan or (2) community fire strategy (include evidence of the plan if it already exists)? D. Explain to what extent the affected community or proponent has been involved or plans to involve the affected community in a qualified fuels education program (e.g., FIREWISE). E. Explain how the proposal (1) leads to, enhances or restores a local fire-adapted ecosystem, and/or (2) mitigates or leads to the mitigation of hazardous fuel conditions. F. How will the proposed treatments or programs be maintained in future years? Response: This project will reduce fire risk to the community by providing properties and structures that are ignition resistant. Ongoing public education measures will also specify the specific risks throughout the year to help reduce the occcurrence of fires. In the long term, access roads and water supply will reduce the fire risk to the overall community. Inspections of facilities within or adjacent to Federal lands will further increase the protection of people and property from wildfires. Application of the requirements of the UWIC will provide an ongoing strategy to promote fire safe development. The ordinance itself specifies a three year review to ensure that regulations are updated as necessary and it is our intent to re-inspect on an annual basis to ensure continued homeowner action to maintain their fire resistance. Inititally we included fire officials, business and industry representatives, local, state and federal governmental agencies and a variety of members from the general public to assist us in the adoption of the UWIC. Our ongoing efforts will include outreach through wildland education at the Central Washington Home Show, Arbor Day events, Fire Awareness Days at the Mall, a Firewise Workshop, FireFree programs and publications, and a variety of nonprofit organization and special interest groups. We also hope to present a Junior Firewise Workshop in our local schools. 2. Increasing local capacity. (30 points) A. How would the proposal improve or lead to the improvement of the local economy in terms of jobs and sustainable economic activity? How many jobs are expected to be created or retained and for how long (please distinguish between essentially yearround and seasonal jobs)? How will this proposal link to toher projects (or proposed projects) to create year-round jobs? B. To what extent will this project be offered to serve as a model for other communities or natural landscapes? C. Will biomass or forest fuels be utilized; if so, in what manner and how much? Response: By coordinating efforts of multiple governmental agencies, nonprofit organizations, and the building industry, we will be able to deliver a more community-wide program. While this may not increase jobs, it will help ensure the need for those currently participating in these efforts. Fire safety education will be available through various formal presentations, publications, public service announcements, on-site demonstrations and ongoing media programs. We are anticipating the need for one additional person, working in concert with current staff, to implement this program. This person will coordinate efforts with volunteer and rural fire districts and the Yakama Indian Nation in an attempt to reach citizens in hazardous areas who do not ordinarily have access to these prevention programs. To my knowledge there is only one other county in Washington State that has adopted an Urban Wildland Interface Ordinance. As a member of Region 7 Life Safety Council, which encompasses three wildland counties (Yakima, Kittitas, and Klickitat), we are able to share our programs and assist these agencies in their wildland mitigation efforts. Through the Washington State Association of Fire Marshals, we have further opportunity to provide a model to any jurisdiction that would request our assistance. Enclosure 3B (Page 3 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria 3. Increasing interagency and intergovernmental coordination. (15 Points) A. Describe how this project implements a local intergovernmental strategy or plan, or creates such a plan. Describe the plan if it already exists. B. Explain the level of cooperation, coordination or strategic planning through a “Local Coordination Group” for wildland fire activities, or among federal, state, tribal, local government and community organizations. List the cooperators (a detailed list of cooperators will be required for projects that are funded). Response: Over the past several years we have been working with representatives from the Central Washington Homebuilders, Washington Architects Association, Sturctural Engineers of Washington, U.S. Forest Service, Department of Defense, Yakama Indian Reservation, Department of Natural Resources, fire officials, and private citizen groups to enact the UWIC Ordinance and promote voluntary participation in wildfire mitigation efforts. These partners have assisted us in ongoing promotion of public education programs through the community. We will continue to draw upon the exprertise of all of these agencies in their fields to provide the best educational information and programs possible. We will also be providing "train the trainer" education so that we may take advantage of the volunteer organizations who are willing to help deliver our educational programs. We are hoping to further enhance our outreach efforts in our rural schools and with tribal students in coordination with Yakama Nation, Forest Service, and DNR representatives. Currently we are coordinating efforts with the DNR to join representatives from Yakima County, Kittitas County, and the Yakama Indian Nation into a Central Cascade Co-Op for wildland protection. Through these partnerships we intend to prepare community fire plans to identify priority fire hazards, complete hazardous resource assessments, and develop interagency strategic fire plans. 4. Expanding Community Participation. (15 Points) A. To what extent have interested individuals, groups, and communities been provided an opportunity to become informed and involved in this proposal? B. Describe the extent of local support or opposition for the project, including any cost-sharing arrangements. C. What are the environmental, social and educational benefits or concerns of the project? Response: Over the past few years we have been working with local fire officials, business and industry representatives, local, state, and federal governmental agencies and the general public to develop our UWIC Ordinance. Many of those individuals testified in favor of this project at the public hearing. Representatives of various groups and officials attended a Firewise Workshop which was held in Yakima. Many of these agencies have agreed to provide staff and equipment toward the ongoing public awareness and education of wildfire mitigation efforts. We intend to provide educational materials in both English and Spanish to help accommodate our diverse population. We also have a commitment from a number of nonprofit orgainzations to support and promote the program. Recently we have also been involved in discussions with our Office of Emergency Management and their associated partners and volunteers to address mitigation efforts in building and fire safety issues. Our ultimate goal is to develop a long-term plan addressing the role of each agency in the overall prevention and management of wildand fires. Through these partnerships, we intend to demonstrate the relationship between responsible fire safety practices and the protection of our wildlife, our Native cultrual resources, and our natural resources. Enclosure 3C - Project Work Form Tasks Time Frame Responsible Party Identify, Inspect, Investigate, and Plan Review Structures within Urban Wildland Interface Areas; Record Risk Abatement for Existing Properties; Identify Site Specific UWIC Properties January 1 - December 31, 2004 Fire Protection Bureau Staff Distribute Printed Educational Materials; Conduct Media Interviews; Deliver Public Education Programs to Current Property Owners January 1 - December 31, 2004 Multi-Agency Partners, Fire Protection Bureau Staff Deliver Public Safety Announcements January 1 - December 31, 2004 Fire Protection Bureau Staff Update Informational Web Page January 1 - December 31, 2004 Fire Protection Bureau Staff, Technology Services Speak at Community Events/Business Meetings January 1 - December 31, 2004 Fire Protection Bureau Staff, MultiAgency Partners Record Statistics for Public Education Program Delivery; Evaluate Program Success January 1 - December 31, 2004 Fire Protection Bureau Staff Prepare Community Fire Plans, Coordinate with Central Cascade Co-op, Develop Interagency Strategic Fire Plans January 1 - December 31, 2004 Fire Protection Bureau Staff, MultiAgency Partners Enclosure 3D Project Budget Cost Category Description Federal Agency Applicant Partner 1 Partner 2 Total Personnel $31,800.00 $10,400.00 $42,200.00 Subtotal $31,800.00 $10,400.00 $42,200.00 Fringe Benefits $7,800.00 $2,600.00 $10,400.00 Subtotal $7,800.00 $2,600.00 $10,400.00 Travel $1,500.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 Subtotal $1,500.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 Supplies $8,900.00 $3,400.00 $12,300.00 Subtotal $8,900.00 $3,400.00 $12,300.00 Other $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 Subtotal $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $4,000.00 $52,000.00 $18,900.00 $70,900.00 Equipment Subtotal Contractual Subtotal Total Costs Project (Program) Income1 (using deductive alternative) 1 Program income is the gross revenue generated by a grant or cooperative agreement supported activity during the life of the grant. Program income can be made by recipients from fees charged for conference or workshop attendance, from rental fees earned from renting out real property or equipment acquired with grant or cooperative agreement funds, or from the sale of commodities or items developed under the grant or cooperative agreement. The use of Program Income during the project period may require prior approval by the granting agency.