Enclosure 3B - Project Summary Form 162 NATIONAL FIRE PLAN COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE AND WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE PROJECTS Application for Community Risk Assessment and Mitigation Planning Applicant Applicant/Organization: Jackson County Phone: Type of Applicant: (enter appropriate letter in box) B (541) 774-6086 FAX: A. State B. County C. Municipal D. Township E. Interstate F. Intermunicipal G. Special District (541) 774-6455 Email: bernhald@jacksoncounty.org H. Independent School District I. State-Controlled Institution of Higher Learning J. Private University K. Indian Tribe L. Nonprofit Organization M. Other (Specify) _______________________ Address (Street or P. O. Box, City, State, Zip): 10 South Oakdale Ave, Medford, OR 97501 Project Coordinator Project Coordinator (Name and Title): Lin Bernhardt, Natural Resources Coordinator Organization/Jurisdiction: Jackson County Phone: (541) 774-6086 FAX: (541) 774-6455 Email: bernhald@jacksoncounty.org Project Information Project Title: Jackson County Integrated Fire Plan Proposed Project Start Date: March 1, 2005 Proposed Project End Date: February 28, 2006 Federal Funding Request: $80,000 Total Project Cost: $100,000 Are you submitting multiple projects? If so, please prioritize, and explain if the projects are stand alone, sequential, or other: No Brief Project Summary: Who, What, Where, Desired Outcomes in relation to NFP Goals and Community Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plans (This should summarize page 2). Jackson County proposes to develop a county-wide integrated fire plan that will be closely linked with the fire plan that neighboring Josephine County is currently developing. Core elements of this plan include a wildfire risk assessment, an evaluation of emergency operations, and a mitigation action plan. The result of this plan will be to minimize the threats of wildfire to communities and the environment. Project Location: Jackson County County: Jackson Name of Federal, tribal, and/or State Official with whom you coordinated this proposal: Paul Galloway, US Forest Service Jim Wolf, Oregon Dept. of Forestry Tom Murphy, BLM Federal Congressional District: Telephone number of Contact: 541 552-2921 541 664-3328 541 618-2236 Enclosure 3B (Page 1 of 3) - Project Narrative Description Applications for funding must include a narrative response that describes the proposal. Please do not submit responses longer than one page, single space, 12-pitch font. Describe project including, but not limited to: change fire behavior WHO are your collaborators - are they current or potential collaborators? Address these through fuels reduction describe the relationship of this plan’s desired outcome to NFP Goals items as increase community and to any existing community fire protection plan. applicable: education and awareness project time frames and matching or contributed funds enhance fire protection tools and/or skills needed to complete project capability specific project location, geographic extent, and fire risk assessment desired outcome methodology For this project, explain the level of cooperation, coordination or strategic planning, through a “Local Coordination Group.” If you haven’t worked with a local coordination group, why not? Desired Outcomes – To complete an integrated fire plan for Jackson County that will result in increased protection for resources, property, and human life. The plan will be closely aligned with Josephine County’s fire plan and coordinated with the Josephine/Jackson Local Coordinating Committee (JJLCG), of which Jackson County is a member. Collaborators – Collaborators include all the members of the JJLCG, which are the Forest Service, BLM, Oregon Dept. of Forestry, Josephine County, Jackson County, the Rogue Valley Fire Chiefs Association, and Southern Oregon Regional Economic Development Inc. (SOREDI). Other collaborators will include fire protection districts within Jackson County, the State Fire Marshal, and other community and governmental organizations. Relationship to NFP goals – NFP funding is intended to support strategic community risk assessment and mitigation plans, which is exactly what the Jackson County Integrated Fire Plan is proposed to do. The plan will identify and prioritize risk, and identify actions for mitigation. Project time frames and matching funds – The plan will be developed between March 1, 2005 and February 28, 2006. The county will provide 20% for in-kind match. Tools and skills needed to complete the plan – Jackson County will contract with an expert in fire planning to develop the plan with staff guidance. Staff work closely with agency partners and serve as a member of the JJLCG. Specific project location, geographic extent, and fire risk assessment – The plan will cover all of Jackson County but will be closely coordinated with the Josephine County fire plan. Risk assessment will occur on a two-county basis and will include at least the following elements: fire hazard rating, fire risk, evaluation of protection capability, and structural vulnerability. Change in fire behavior through fuels reduction – The plan will identify a fuels reduction strategy that will include an outreach component. Increase in community education and awareness – This will occur through the outreach and public involvement components of the plan. This will include such things as public meetings, presentations, and distribution of educational materials. Enhanced fire protection capability – This will occur through a variety of means including increased coordination and a better understanding of roles and responsibilities, hazard identification and prioritization, and hazard mapping, Enclosure 3B (Page 2 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria Applications for funding, must include narrative responses that address the following four criteria. Be sure you address every one briefly, yet thoroughly. Limit your responses to the area provided. 1. Planning for Action (40 points) A. Describe your desired plan outcome and how the outcome will be measured. B. How will the plan address : Fire behavior changes through fuels reduction Community education and awareness Enhanced suppression capability C. How will the completed plan be implemented, and by whom? OR How does this plan enhance or complete previous fire planning by the community? D. How will the plan address landowner responsibility for implementation of this plan? E. Describe your ability to complete project in one year of receipt of funds Response: A. The desired outcome is to reduce the risk of fire to resources, property and human life. This will be done through collaboration with other agencies and the public. The plan will identify hazards and risk, address emergency operations (i.e. protection capabilities), and identify mitigation actions. The plan will also include a section on monitoring that will identify benchmarks. Annual updates on progress and lessons learned will be incorporated in plan revisions. B. Fire behavior changes through fuels reduction: A strategy for fuel reduction will be based on identification of hazards and risk. Community education and awareness: This will occur through the outreach and public involvement components of the plan. This will include such things as public meetings, presentations, and distribution of educational materials. Enhanced suppression capability: An evaluation of suppression capability will include wildland suppression procedures, training resources and needs, inventory of resources, communication, and mutual aid and evacuation procedures. C. The plan will be developed by a consultant with the oversight of county staff. It will be developed in close cooperation with the JJLCG and Josephine County fire plan. Local plans, such as the Applegate Fire Plan, will be incorporated in – and will inform – the county plan. D. Landowner responsibility will be addressed through the public outreach and education components of the plan. Their role will be addressed in the emergency operations section (e.g. telephone trees, emergency contacts, evacuation procedures etc.), and the mitigation action plan (e.g. fuel reduction). E. Josephine County is significantly ahead in terms of developing their fire plan. Much of this effort and experience can be capitalized upon. Also, an agreement will be in place to ensure that the consultant we hire will complete the plan in the given time frame. 2. Enhancing Community Collaboration and Local Capacity. (30 points ) A. Describe your strategy for collaboration to develop this plan across multiple ownerships. B. Identify the interested partners and members of the community who are involved in this project, and the level of their involvement. C. How will this project enhance local community collaboration and local capacity for cooperative action? D. Describe skills or experience the community will gain through development of this plan. Response: A. The strategy involves working closely with the JJLCG, which includes the public landowners. The JJLCG is now well established and the county is a key player. The plan’s outreach strategy will address private landowners. B. In addition to representatives from the JJLCG, we have been working closely with representatives from the Applegate Fire Plan. Sandy Shaffer participates on the JJLCG. C. & D. The fire plan will assist the fire protection agencies in understanding the existing standards of each agency. It will incorporate existing agreements among agencies and see if new ones are needed. Participants will evaluate the current structure and evaluate where improvements can be made. The plan will also outline opportunities for interagency fire education and prevention programs. The plan will be used by participating agencies to inform those they serve on how services are being maximized through strong cooperation and the sharing of resources and expertise. Enclosure 3B (Page 3 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria 3. Expanding Community Participation. (30 Points) A. B. C. D. E. Explain the level of cooperation, coordination and/or involvement of the Local Coordination Group. List the cooperators/members (in a broad way) of the local area coordination group. Describe your strategy for leveraging funding. Who are the partners and what is their commitment to the plan’s completion, including any existing or proposed cost-share agreements and their status. Describe the extent of local support or opposition for the project. Describe your strategy for post-plan marketing and collaboration for the successful implementation of the next steps described in the plan. To what extent will this project be offered to serve as a model for other communities in your sub-geographic area, state-wide area? Response: A. The JJLCG will be very involved in this plan from beginning to end. The members include the Forest Service, BLM, Oregon Dept. of Forestry, the Rogue Valley Fire Chiefs Association, Southern Oregon Regional Economic Development, Inc. (SOREDI), and Josephine and Jackson counties. B. Jackson County will be providing a 20% match for in-kind services. If additional funds are needed, the county may apply to the Forest Service and BLM RACs as well as Title III. C. This effort to develop a fire plan is strongly supported locally. Josephine County and agency officials have been encouraging this effort as has the Applegate Partnership, a local group that has developed a model community fire plan. D. Collaboration will continue through the JJLCG, Josephine County, agency partners, and residents. There will be timeline developed for project implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. A monitoring plan will be developed which will include annual updates of progress and a description of how benchmarks have been achieved, a description of monitoring and evaluation, and plans for updating and continued community involvement. E. Jackson County is part of District 4, which also includes Josephine, Douglas, Coos and Curry counties. Jackson County took the lead on developing the 5-county Wildland Fire Resource and Inventory Study of 2003. The next logical step is for each county to have an integrated county fire plan. It is anticipated that the Jackson and Josephine county fire plans will serve as a model. Enclosure 3C - Project Work Form Tasks Time Frame Responsible Party Hire consultant March 2005 Jackson County Form advisory group Determine how it will interface with Josephine County’s group and the JJLCG April 2005 Jackson County/ Consultant Determine planning process and develop more detailed schedule April 2005 Jackson County/ Consultant Collect data, develop wildfire risk assessment June 2005 Consultant/ Jackson County Evaluate emergency operations August 2005 Consultant/ Jackson County Develop mitigation action plan (including a strategy for risk reduction, recommended actions for fuels reduction, and education and community outreach) November 2005 Consultant/ Jackson County Develop monitoring and evaluation chapters January 2006 Consultant/ Jackson County Adopt plan and distribute February 2006 Jackson County Enclosure 3D Project Budget Cost Category Description Federal Agency Applicant Partner 1 Partner 2 Personnel Subtotal Fringe Benefits Subtotal Travel Subtotal Equipment Subtotal Supplies Subtotal Contractual Plan development $80,000 Subtotal $80,000 Other Contract oversight, overhead $20,000 Subtotal Total Costs $20,000 $80,000 $20,000 Project (Program) Income1 (using deductive alternative) 1 Program income is the gross revenue generated by a grant or cooperative agreement supported activity during the life of the grant. Program income can be made by recipients from fees charged for conference or workshop attendance, from rental fees earned from renting out real property or equipment acquired with grant or cooperative agreement funds, or from the sale of commodities or items developed under the grant or cooperative agreement. The use of Program Income during the project period may require prior approval by the granting agency. Total