Enclosure 3D - Project Summary Form 157 NATIONAL FIRE PLAN COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE AND WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE PROJECTS Application for Fuels Utilization and Marketing Projects Applicant Applicant/Organization: Forest Restoration Partnership Phone: Type of Applicant: (enter appropriate letter in box) l 541-929-4377 FAX: A. State B. County C. Municipal D. Township E. Interstate F. Intermunicipal G. Special District 775-263-4242 Email: darin@forestpartners.org H. Independent School District I. State-Controlled Institution of Higher Learning J. Private University K. Indian Tribe L. Nonprofit Organization M. Other (Specify) _______________________ Address (Street or P. O. Box, City, State, Zip): 1420 E 22nd Ave, Eugene OR 97403 Project Coordinator Project Coordinator (Name and Title): Darin Stringer, Director Organization/Jurisdiction: N/A Phone: 541-929-4377 FAX: 775-263-4242 Email: darin@forestpartners.org Project Information Project Title: Harvester Chipper Bagger Machine design and construction Proposed Project Start Date: 110/04 Proposed Project End Date: 9/05 Federal Funding Request: $261,700 Total Project Funding: 314,040 Are you submitting multiple projects? If so, please explain and prioritize: No Brief Project Summary: Who, What, Where, Desired Outcomes in relation to NFP Goals and Community Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plans (This should summarize page 2). FRP proposes to design and build a harvesting machine which will harvest small diameter trees, chip the trees, and then bale the chips for subsequent forwarding to the landing and finally to the biomass facility. The machine will mostly be based upon existing available components and proven technology. The existing technology includes: New Holland TV145 Bi-Directional Tractor; Valby 10” PTO driven chipper; Nokka grapple loader and trailer; Norrhydro Felling Grab; New Holland BR740 bailer modified to handle chips. Slight modification of some of the components will be required. All custom designed components will be illustrated with computer aided design (CAD) software, and assembly instructions will be published. The machine design will be published on a web site, and 4 month of demonstration tours will be conducted on the Deschutes National Forest. The machine will be a prototype for a final production machine costing less than $175,00 which can be assembled by loggers. Project Location: County: Federal Congressional District: Philomath Oregon, Bend Oregon Benton, Deschutes 2nd Name of Federal, State or Tribal contact with whom you coordinated this proposal: Telephone number of Contact: Cindi Glick, Deschutes National Forest, 541-383-5495 Enclosure 3D (Page 1 of 3) - Project Narrative Description Applications for funding must include a narrative response that describes the proposal. Please do not submit responses longer than one page, single space, 12-pitch font. Describe project including, but not limited to: Geographic scope of project Address these Is the project linked to a plan? items as Project time frames and partners applicable: Specify types of activities and equipment used Anticipated outcomes and measures of success How will the project results be reported? Special skills or expertise needed to complete the work For this project, explain the level of cooperation, coordination or strategic planning, through a “Local Coordination Group.” If you haven’t worked with a local coordination group, why not? Response: FRP proposes to design and build a harvesting machine which will harvest small diameter trees, chip the trees, and then bale the chips for subsequent forwarding to the landing and finally to the biomass facility. The machine will mostly be based upon existing available components and proven technology. The basic machine will be a New Holland TV145 Bidirectional Tractor. The TV145 and its predecessors, including the TV140 and the 9030 Versatile, are durable machines with a long track record of customization for forestry applications. Over the past decade, these machines have been fitted with knuckle-booms for use as brush mowers throughout the west, and with processing heads to harvest small diameter trees in Eastern Canada. The TV145 has 105HP (PTO), is articulated, has three separate hydraulic systems with up to 60 GPM, and has both PTO’s and 3 Pt hitches at both ends of the tractor. The cab end of the TV145 will be fitted with a Nokka 4475H knuckle-boom, and a Norrhydro felling grab. The Nokka will be frame mounted. This combination will allow the operator to reach out and fell small diameter trees (2” –10”) and build a small piles of chippable material in front of the machine.. A Valby Chipper (CH260) will be mounted on the 3 pt hitch on the cab end and powered through the PTO of the TV145. The Valby will handle material up to 10” in diameter and the infeed can be controlled from within the cab. The operator will use the Nokka and felling grab to place the material in the infeed chute of the Valby. While the material is being chipped, the operator will continue felling and bunching small diameter trees. The chipped material will be blown through a tube to the engine end of the TV145, where a modified hay baler will be mounted (New Holland BR740). The baler will compress and roll the chips into a round bale (4’ wide by 4’ tall), the bales will be tightly wrapped using the EdgeWrap™ system to prevent separation. The bales will be expelled from the baler and deposited on the forest floor. Subsequently the bales will be forwarded to the landing using a conventional forwarder or a forwarding trailer towed from the cab end of the TV145. The bunks of the forwarder or forwarding trailer will be slightly modified to accommodate the bales of chips. The forwarding of the bags to the landing will minimize site disturbance, and large landing size, usually associated with whole tree harvesting. The compressed bags of chips will maximize trucking efficiency. Flat bed trucks will be loaded with the forwarder or the knuckle boom on the TV145. The components needed will be: New Holland TV145 tractor; Noka 4475H knuckle-boom; Norrhydro felling grab; Valby CH260 chipper; Nokka 122H forwarding trailer; A modified New Holland BR740 bailer. Partners Include: The Deschutes National Forest – Demo Site – Cindi Glick; Nichols Consulting – Engineering – Bill Nichols; Trent Machinery – Machine shop – Troy Trent; South Fork Fabrication – Machine Shop – Russ Salvage. Rotochopper, Inc. Anticipated outcomes: The final outcome will be a fully functional harvesting system which will be demonstrated to potential users on a demo site on the Deschutes National Forest. Assembly instructions and CAD blueprints will be published on a web site so that other users may assemble their own machines. Project results will be reported via a web site and through demonstrations of the system. Enclosure 3D (Page 2 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria Applications for funding must include narrative responses that address the following four criteria. Within each criterion, subcriteria are listed in descending order of importance. Limit your responses to the areas provided. 1. Increasing Economic Utilization of Woody Material Removed in Fuels Management and Forest Restoration Activities (50 Points) A. Will biomass or forest fuels be utilized? If so, in what manner and how much? B. Will the project improve the local economy in terms of jobs and sustainable economic activity? C. How many jobs are expected to be created or retained, and for how long? D. Are any private businesses involved in this project? If so, what are their roles? E. Can this project be offered to serve as a model to other communities or businesses? If so, why and how will the model be conveyed or made available? F. If the project involves new product development, what evidence is there for appropriate markets and end-users? G. How will the project be sustained or carried forward beyond the project timelines? Will it depend on public funding sources? Response: Utilization: The system is specially designed to effectively and efficiently harvest and utilize small diameter forest biomass. In addition, the system is design to minimize site disturbance by allowing for the forwarding of the chip material to the landing as opposed to skidding. Because the machine will produce dense bales of chips in a logistically logical size (4’X4’) trucking efficiency will be maximized. This will enable flat bed semi trailers to be loaded to maximum allowable gross weights. Economy and Jobs: Successful design and assembly of the machine and harvesting system will revolutionize the harvesting of biomass fuels in the intermountain west. The efficiency promoted by the system will significantly reduce the costs of producing biomass fuel from small diameter thinnings. This efficiency will lead to a whole new industry related to the harvesting and burning of biomass. It is anticipated that hundreds of new jobs will be promoted in the forest products industry if this efficient harvesting system is designed and implemented. Private Businesses: Innovative engineering firms and machine shops with extensive experience in designing and modifying harvesting machines will be the primary basis for design concepts and mechanical solutions. Theses business were listed in the previous section. Model: The whole intent of this proposal is to design, model, build, and relay the plans, of a harvester specifically designed to meet the need for a fuels reduction in the West. Information will be conveyed at demos, and through a detailed web site which will publish assembly information, and blueprints, as well as production information and user instructions. Appropriate Markets: It is anticipated that the machine will cost about $175,000 to build, once the design and modifications are worked through. This means that a logger could buy the components, and easily assemble them himself, and be up and running with less than a week of assembling and building time, for less than 25% of the cost of a cut-to-length, processor/forwarder system. In addition, almost half the cost of the system is in the TV145 tractor which could easily be sold or leased into the agricultural market, during poor market conditions, or during the winter months. Hence, the machine and system is very attractive to gyppos and would be in high demand. Because of it efficiency, the machine would help to create biomass markets where previous inefficiencies prevented the development. Project Future: Once the machine was up and running and the initial trial and demonstrations concluded, it is expected that the machine would be put into full scale production. It would be used by FRP on fuels reduction projects throughout the PNW, where visitors and interested candidates could continue to come and see it in action. Enclosure 3D (Page 3 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria A. B. C. D. E. 2. Expanding community participation and collaboration. (30 points ) Identify the partners and community members involved in planning and implementing the project. Describe the extent of local support for this project. How much cost-sharing is there for the project? Who are these partners and what are the arrangements? What are the direct community benefits that will result from this project? How will you use multi-party monitoring to improve this and future projects? Response: Partners: include the companies listed on the previous page and the Deschutes National Forest. Local Support: is very large for this project. Many contract loggers have express a great deal of interest in the proposed machine and system. The Confederated Tribes of the Warm Springs are interested in it as a means to better harvest biomass on their lands and to help feed their biomass cogen facility from outside sources. Cost Sharing includes 20% reduction in standard billable rates and materials for the Private Partners and FRP, as well as a 20% reduction in price from the following machinery producers: New Holland, Valby, Nokka, & Hakmet. Direct Community Benefits include: greater utilization of biomass; jobs and higher income; and a sustainable biomass industry. Multi-party Monitoring will be used to convey new ideas and concepts into the project. Experts from the federal agencies will be solicited at every phase of the project to provide peer review. 3. Taking Advantage of Existing Networks, previously-funded projects and knowledge. (20 Points) A. Describe how the proposed project takes advantage of relevant, existing networks and previously-funded projects. B. Describe who and what were consulted to ensure the best information available was used in designing this project proposal. Response: Relevant Networks and Outside Consultation: FRP has been working on a conceptual model of the proposed machine and harvesting system over the past 3 ½ years. In that time, it has been taking advantage of its close ties with its existing network of private partners, to help in this conceptual design. What has been proposed has been thoroughly thought out and preliminary designs have been conceptualized. Marc Barnes, with FRP, has over 20 years experience with small wood harvesting design and use. Over the past 3 ½ years, FRP has consulted with numerous other firms who have used the TV140 and 9030 versatile as the basis for similar harvesting systems – mainly cut-to-length (CTL)where residual slash deposition is irrelevant (wet forest types). These firms include Rocan Forestry LTD www.rocan.com , which has been modify the New Holland machines over the past decade into CTL machines. FRP has also consulted extensively with North East Implement (http://www.valbysales.com/index.htm ), which has been involved with the design and distribution of Valby chippers, as well as loader and forwarding trailers over the past 25 years. Enclosure 3D - Project Work Form Tasks Time Frame Responsible Party Assemble Team and finalize conceptual design Month 1 FRP with Partners Peer Review by USFS, and BLM. Assemble engineering plans for machinery, order machinery and components Month 2 FRP Bill Nichols Work on customization design and do CAD drawings Month 3 –4 Nichols South Fork Fab Lent Machinery Build custom components Assemble machine – and machine modifications Months 3 –5 South Fork Fab Lent Machinery Months 5-7 Nichols South Fork Fab Lent Machinery Little Industries Test Machine Months 7-8 FRP Nichols Demo Machine Months 8-12 FRP USFS Nichols Months 11 -12 FRP Nichols Prepare report and publish plans and CAD drawings Enclosure 4D - Project Budget Cost Category Description Federal Agency Applicant Partner 1 Partner 2 Total Personnel 30,000 6,000 36,000 2,200 440 2,640 Subtotal Fringe Benefits Subtotal Travel Subtotal Equipment NH TV145 Tractor, NH BR740 Bailer Nokka Loader, Trailer, Valby Chipper Subtotal 111,000 72,000 133200 22,200 14,400 Supplies 6,000 1,200 22,000 18,500 0 261,700 7,640 7,200 Subtotal Contractual South Fork, Lent Machinery Nichols Consulting Subtotal 4,400 3,700 Other Subtotal Total Costs 36,6000 8,100 Project (Program) Income1 1 Program income is the gross revenue generated by a grant or cooperative agreement supported activity during the life of the grant. Program income can be made by recipients from fees charged for conference or workshop attendance, from rental fees earned from renting out real property or equipment acquired with grant or cooperative agreement funds, or from the sale of commodities or items developed under the grant or cooperative agreement. The use of Program Income during the project period may require prior approval by the granting agency. 26,400 22,200