Enclosure 3A - Project Summary Form 35 NATIONAL FIRE PLAN COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE AND WILDLAND URBAN INTERFACE PROJECTS Application for Fuels Treatment Projects Applicant Applicant/Organization: Wilson Ranch Properties Owners Association Phone: 509-996-3163 Type of Applicant: (enter appropriate letter in box) L FAX: 509-996-3411 A. State B. County C. Municipal D. Township E. Interstate F. Intermunicipal G. Special District Email: gregg@methownet.com H. Independent School District I. State-Controlled Institution of Higher Learning J. Private University K. Indian Tribe L. Nonprofit Organization M. Other (Specify) _______________________ Address (Street or P. O. Box, City, State, Zip): 18599 hwy 20, Winthrop WA 98862 Project Coordinator Project Coordinator (Name and Title): Jim Gregg, Property Owner Manager Organization/Jurisdiction: Wilson Ranch Property Owners Assoc. (WR-POA) Phone: 509-996-3163 FAX: 509-996-3411 Email: gregg@methownet.com Project Information Project Title: Wilson Ranch boundary Fire Wise thinning Proposed Project Start Date: May 10, 2005 Proposed Project End Date: November 1, 2005 Federal Funding Request: 80% Total Project Cost: $16,000 Are you submitting multiple projects? If so, please prioritize, and explain if the projects are stand alone, sequential or other: This project stands alone. It ties to a Fire Wise project nearby that was completed in 2002. Brief Project Summary: Who, What, Where, Desired Outcomes in relation to NFP Goals and Community Risk Assessment and Mitigation Plans (This should summarize page 2). The WR-POA is an organization established to manage the private properties and common open space within the 175 acre Wilson Ranch/Freestone Inn Resort community. The community is adjacent to National Forest system lands near the base of the eastern North Cascade mountains. The project is located in the upper Methow Valley near Mazama, 16 miles from Winthrop, along Highway 20. It is proposed to thin, (make fire safe) approximately 16 acres along the National Forest boundary. A Fire Wise thinning would be done on common open space and private ownership. The result will reduce fire risk to the private land as well as nearby National Forest. Project Location: Sec. 25 &26 T.36N., R.19E.W.M. County: Okanogan County Federal Congressional District: 5 Name of Federal, State or Tribal contact with whom you coordinated this proposal: Telephone number of Contact: Chuck Johnson, Urban Interface Fire Management, Dept Natural Resources 509-684-7474 Enclosure 3A (Page 1 of 3) - Project Narrative Description Applications for funding must include a narrative response that describes the proposal. Please do not submit responses longer than one page, single space, 12-pitch font. Describe project including, but not limited to: project location (e.g., Watershed, Address neighboring community) these items as applicable: anticipated outcomes project relationship to the community risk assessment and mitigation plan amount or extent of actions (acres, number of homes, etc.) community partners and their project timeline and matching or contributed funds role(s) proponent’s ability to complete project For this project, explain the level of cooperation, coordination or strategic planning, through a “Local Coordination Group.” If you haven’t worked with a local coordination group, why not? Project location: This project area is within the Upper Methow Watershed Planning Unit, at the foot of the North Cascades. Mazama is the closest community. The project lies within a narrow peninsula of private land that penetrates into the National Forest. The project is within the Wilson Ranch Planned Development which is an approved planned development for the Freestone Inn (21 rooms and 15 cabins and 27 privately owned lots). Anticipated outcomes: It is proposed to thin, (make fire safe) approximately 16 acres along the National Forest boundary. This will reduce wildfire risk from reaching the adjacent National Forest as well as reducing the risk of fire coming from the National Forest and reaching private land. Partners: The action proposed with this grant could support the Forest Service in completing similar work on their side of the boundary. Such a project in this resort type setting could demonstrate to many, a desirable outcome from urban interface fire prevention. In January 2004, an action item at the WR_POA meeting was to seek opportunities for forest thinning. A limited amount of marketable timber would be made available for local log manufacturing. Firewood would be made available to the community. Private owners constructing homes may utilize some of the larger materials. Risk assessment: Fire has had an active role in the area for many years. Past fires have burned in the area but more recently a build up of fine fuels has occurred. With a wind driven weather event, much of the private land in this area is at risk of catastrophic wildfire. In addition, the visitor oriented tourist business can cause a certain risk of human caused fire by those who are unaware of how easily a wildfire can start. Extent of action: The non-profit WR-POA serves the interest of all owners of the Wilson Ranch. A complete description of the Wilson Ranch including maps, Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, Covenants Conditions & Restrictions, and Design Guidelines can be found at www.wilsonranch.com. These documents along with the Landscape/Habitat Management Plan and a Forest Management Plan, filed with the planned development in 2003, support this grant application to improve the natural forest setting in the area Timeline and match: It is anticipated to complete this grant project as soon as possible, once snow leaves the area in 2005. The WR-POA manager who will coordinate the project is trained in forestry and has worked for the Forest Service for 30 years. The WR-POA proposes to match the thinning project by establishing a fire education program for residents and employees, and by constructing two wild fire tool caches on the property. The association also proposes to purchase a portable pump for basic wildfire control. In addition, it is proposed to establish a limited irrigation plan to maintain green areas strategically located through out the property. (Contact has been made with the local coordination group to include this grant as a consideration. (We were not aware of the original rating meetings) Enclosure 3A (Page 2 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria Applications for funding must include narrative responses that address the following three criteria. Be sure you address every one briefly, yet thoroughly. Limit your responses to the area provided. 1. Reducing Hazardous Fuels (50 points) A. Describe the community infrastructure that will be protected. B. Explain how the proposal reduces fire behavior in high hazard areas by describing the fuels to be disposed or removed, and the techniques and timing of the treatments. C. How will the proposed treatments be maintained in future years? D. How will you use multi-party monitoring to improve this and future projects? Response: A. The Primary reason guests come to the Freestone Inn and Wilson Ranch is to enjoy and participate in the natural environment of the area. The Inn, cabins and individual homes have all been architecturally designed to complement this forested setting. Landscaping has been created to support the natural setting and contribute to the aesthetics of the site. The community includes a 3-acre lake with fishing, a wetland area, a full service restaurant, a recreation center, pool, convention facilities and interpretive trails. Facilities also exist for hiking, biking, skiing, snowshoeing, and horseback riding. The importance of maintaining a healthy natural forest setting that is fire safe is critical to the survival of our tourist-oriented business. B. A mixture of Douglas-Fir and Ponderosa Pine exists in the project area. With out disturbance, these stands have become dense with the fir invading the pine stands and creating a major fuel base for wildfire. The proposal would involve a heavy thinning to allow Ponderosa Pine to thrive and remove hazardous ladder fuel. Important would be removal of the fine fuels by chipping or hand piling and burning. The importance of high value real estate and residential screening will be a factor in guiding the level of thinning. A diversity of landscape that meets wildfire needs will necessitate adjustments to a strictly siliviculturally oriented thinning. C. Additional treatments near the actual residential building envelopes will take place by the property owners as residences are built. D. All of the lot area and the common open space near the lots are controlled by the Wilson Ranch Property Association (WR-POA). All cutting of trees and modifications of a residential site must be approved by the Wilson Ranch Design Review Community. The direction of the Forest Management Plan and the Design Guidelines will provide the framework for future forest improvements. Enclosure 3A (Page 3 of 3) - Project Evaluation Criteria 2. Increasing Local Capacity (25 points) A. How would the proposal improve or lead to the improvement of the local economy in terms of jobs and sustainable economic activity? B. How many jobs are expected to be created or retained and for how long? (Please distinguish between essentially year-round and seasonal jobs). C. What tools and skills will be gained or utilized as a result of this project? D. Will biomass be utilized; if so, in what manner and how much? Response: A. Due to its remote location and small size the resort has had difficulty competing with larger facilities closer to metropolitan areas. I t is anticipated that once a residential community is built and established it will allow the resort to stand on its own. Sixteen of the private lots have been sold and 6 have built residences. It is anticipated that most of the remaining lots will be built on soon. If, on the other hand, wildfire were allowed to negatively impact the area, the success of the resort would be at risk. Freestone Inn Wilson Ranch is the largest employer in the upper valley with 30 - 40 employees. B. A contract is anticipated to implement the project. A seasonal contract crew of five for 40 days would complete the cutting, liming and fine fuel treatment. C. A continues awareness for wildfire would be generated among the lot owners. Guests, through selfinterpretive trails and guided nature walks, both winter and summer in the area would also create additional awareness. D. Fine material would be either chipped or piled and burned. Larger logs would be made available for firewood. Saw logs would be used for residential construction by the owner or made available to local log manufactures. 3. Demonstrating Community and Intergovernmental Collaboration (25 Points) A. How will this project implement a community risk assessment and mitigation plan? Include name of plan, date it was prepared, and local contact to get a copy of the plan if requested. B. How has this treatment been coordinated with adjacent landowners and local/State/Tribal/Federal agencies? C. Identify the cooperators/partners involved in implementation of this project. D. Describe the extent of current local support for the project, including any cost-sharing agreements. Response: A. Lorah Waters is the coordinating person. Although the Freestone Inn Wilson Ranch was not involved in the initial project rating for this grant, we have since requested to be involved. There is a local forest practices group that is involved in helping private landowners address forest management. B. Discussions have taken place with the Methow Ranger District including a site visit. The Department of Natural Resources was involved in completing an initial thinning a portion of the resort property. C. The local Forest service is aware of the need to do a project in this area and is planning to address thinning on the National Forest adjacent to this project. No other landowners are nearby. D. The WR-POA proposes to match the thinning project by establishing a fire education program for residents and employees, and by constructing two wild fire tool caches on the property. The association also proposes to purchase a portable pump for basic wildfire control. In addition, it is proposed to establish a limited irrigation plan to maintain green areas strategically located through out the property. Enclosure 3A - Project Work Form Tasks Treat (Fire Wise) 16 acres Time Frame Responsible Party May 2005 –November 2005 Contract Purchase fire cache equipment and pump Irrigate green belt. April 2005 applicant Establish/distribute interpretive signs on trail and educational flyer for owners June 2004 applicant Home owner fire safe Fall 2005 and on going Home owners Cutting , liming, and chipping or piling and burning (which ever is least expensive) Enclosure 3D Project Budget Cost Category Description Federal Agency Applicant Partner 1 Partner 2 Total Personnel WR-POA Interpretive/educational Subtotal 1,200 1,000 1,200 1,200 1,000 1,200 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Fringe Benefits Subtotal Travel Subtotal Equipment fire cache Subtotal Supplies Subtotal Contractual Thinning crew Subtotal 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 Other 16 Individual landowners Subtotal Total Costs 16,000 6,200 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 4,500 26,700 Project (Program) Income1 (using deductive alternative) 1 Program income is the gross revenue generated by a grant or cooperative agreement supported activity during the life of the grant. Program income can be made by recipients from fees charged for conference or workshop attendance, from rental fees earned from renting out real property or equipment acquired with grant or cooperative agreement funds, or from the sale of commodities or items developed under the grant or cooperative agreement. The use of Program Income during the project period may require prior approval by the granting agency.