John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Green's Function of the Biharmonic Operator is not Positive Definite John “Peter” Whitney ES 240 Fall 2007 January 11, 2008 John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Green’s Function For the following inhomogeneous linear differential equation, Lu ( x) = f ( x), The Green’s function is defined as LG ( x, y ) = δ ( x − y ). If the Green’s function is known, the solution can be formed by the integral u ( x) = ∫ G ( x, y ) f ( y )dy. For electrostatics, the Green’s function of the Laplacian represents the electric field due to a unit point charge. For the biharmonic equation, we can interpret it as the deflection field of a thin plate due to a point load. John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 The Green’s function of the Laplacian is positive definite. Consider ∇ 2u = f . This equation models the deflection of a thin elastic membrane. Since the Laplacian is positive definite, a point load results in all deflected points moving in the direction of the applied force. Hadamard (1908) proposed that this might also be true of the biharmonic equation (which models a thin rigid plate instead of an elastic membrane). But this is not true! Hadamard’s conjecture was disproven by counter example in 1949 by Duffin (semi-infinite strip), and in 1951 by Garabedian, for a finite, but sufficiently eccentric ellipse. We will show this behavior by constructing the analytical solution for a point-loaded elliptical plate. We will also make mention of a curious feature of the eigenfunctions of the analogous eigenvalue problem, which is related to the non-positive definiteness of the biharmonic operator. John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Elliptical Coordinates x = c cosh u cosν y = c sinh u sinν (c,0) (c,0) boundary ellipse equation: 1 u1 = sinh −1 c picture from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/EllipticCylindricalCoordinates.html John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Clamped Elliptical Plate, Point Load vertical point force, P, at (0,0) y Clamped boundary: b a x w=0 ∂w =0 ∂u scaled deflection: 2 a c = −1 b wD w= P John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Thin Plate Equations p ∇ ∇ w= K Eh 2 K= 12(1 −ν 2 ) 2 2 particular solution (Cartesian) particular solution (elliptical) w = w p + wh P wp = ( x 2 + y 2 ) log( x 2 + y 2 ) 16πK ∞ Pc 2 wp = α 0 ( u ) + ∑ α n ( u ) cos(nν ) 16πK n =1 (The equations for the alphas are quite complex, and are omitted here. See reference given on next slide for details.) John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Homogeneous solution is composed of a sum of hyperbolic cosines in u, and cosines in nu. “Missing” odd terms are required if point load is not at origin (not considered here). ∞ wh = K 0 + E0 cosh ( 2u ) + ∑ [ An cosh ( nu ) + En −2 cosh ( ( n − 2) u ) + En cosh ( ( n + 2) u ) ] cos(nν ) n=2 Constants are found by adding homogeneous solution to particular solution, and ensuring the boundary conditions are satisfied (details omitted). Solution based on Saito (1959) “Bending of Elliptic Plates under a Concentrated Load” JSME, Vol. 2, No. 6 (Warning, this paper contains errors in the coefficients for the homogeneous solution). John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Verification in the Limiting Case: Circular Plate clamped circular plate 0.02 0.018 series solution (50 terms) exact solution 0.016 0.014 wD/P 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002 0 0 Pa 2 w(r ) = 16πK 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 radius r2 r2 r 1 − 2 + 2 2 log a a a 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 w(0) D 1 = ≈ 0.0199 P 16π John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 5:1 Ellipse, Central Point Load (deflection normalized by maximum deflection) John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Y=0 Cross-section 5:1 ellipse, 2000 points, 400 series terms 0.03 0.025 max wK/P = 0.0287 0.02 wK/P 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 -0.005 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 x 1 2 3 4 5 John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Y=0 Cross-section 5:1 ellipse, 2000 points, 400 series terms 0.03 0.025 max wK/P = 0.0287 0.02 wK/P 0.015 0.01 0.005 0 -0.005 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 x 1 2 3 4 5 John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Plate Pushes Back! x 10 5:1 ellipse, 2000 points, 400 series terms -4 3.5 3 2.5 2 wK/P 1.5 min wK/P = -4.65x10-5 1 “back deflection” is 0.162% of max “forward deflection” 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 -1.5 -4 -3.5 -3 x -2.5 -2 John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Related Phenomenon: Eigenmode Inversion ∇ 2∇ 2φ = λφ N = 2 mode N = 1 mode! plots from Sweers (2001) John Peter Whitney ES240 Term Project Fall 2007 Questions?