Spectrum Regulation for Broadband Legal Disclaimer Christoph Legutko

advertisement
Trends of the Radiocommunication regulatory framework
Spectrum Regulation for Broadband
SESSION 7: NGN and Broadband: Policy and Regulatory Issues
August 2009
Christoph Legutko
Global Public Policy
Intel Corporation
Legal Disclaimer
Disclaimer:
This document is provided for your information only and is not to be relied upon for any purpose, other than educational.
The document is intended only to provide the general insights, opinions, and internally developed guidelines and
procedures of Intel Corporation (Intel). The information in this document may need to be adapted to your specific
situation or work environment.
Intel assumes no liability and disclaims any express or implied warranty regarding the information in the
document, including any liability or warranties relating to fitness for a particular purpose, merchantability, or infringement
of any patent, copyright or other intellectual property right. Intel accepts no liability that you, or a third party might
suffer due to your failure to heed the warning in this disclaimer.
To the extent information in this document is provided in connection with Intel® products, no license, express or implied, by
estoppel or otherwise, to any intellectual property rights is granted by this document, except as provided in Intel’s terms
and conditions of sale for such products.
Intel retains the right to make changes to this document at any time, without notice. Any recommended operating methods
are correct to Intel’s reasonable knowledge at the time of writing. Intel accepts no liability for the implementation of these
methods within the customer’s manufacturing environment. Furthermore, any named third party suppliers are provided
for information only. Intel accepts no liability for the quality of third party suppliers and cannot guarantee the correct or
suitable operation of third party products. You remains solely responsible for the design, manufacture, sale, and
functionality of your product, including any liability arising from product infringement or product warranty.
Intel makes no representation or warranties regarding the document's accuracy or completeness and accepts no duty to
update the document based on more current information.
Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its subsidiaries in the United States
and other countries.
Other names and brands may be claimed by others.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
2
August 2009
GPP
The Internet is the Great Growth Engine
Internet and Cellular Phone Users, Indexed Over the Last 10 Years
Years
Internet
16.0x
Users
14.0x
12.0x
Cellular
Subscribers
10.0x
8.0x
6.0x
4.0x
2.0x
Source: Internet World Stats, RHK, Gartner
0.0x
‘97 ‘98 ‘99 ‘00 ‘01 ‘02 ‘03 ‘04 ‘05 ‘06
Regulatory focus changes –
from voice to data, from circuit switch to all IP
GPP
3
August 2009
Applications
application
And prices?
telecom: roaming, 19 cent for 256 Byte of SMS 742 Euro/MByte
computer: flat rates
Digital Cinema
Blue Ray
video
WLAN
games
EBay
DVD
Google Earth
Enterprises
HD video
Home office
Google
Video SKYPE
banking
CD
WiMAX
music
SKYPE
LNA/file transfer
computer
Data
Voice/SMS
Voice/SMS
Voice/SMS
UMTS
Voice/SMS
more data
HSPA
telecom
1990
2000
2012
Applications drive data throughput requirements
4
August 2009
GPP
Customer expectations
[Mbit/s]
50 Mbit/s
50
Customer expects the
same data speed for
mobile and at home
25 Mbit/s
16 Mbit/s
10
5,0
14,4 Mbit/s HSPA
3,84 Mbit/s UMTS
3 Mbit/s
1,0
Drops immediately when
more than 1 user in the cell
0,5
0,38 Mbit/s
GAP DSL: bandwidth/customer
mobile: bandwidth/cell
GPP
5
August 2009
100++ Mbps wireless connectivity is needed
for good user experience
OK
I’ll do something else in between
Let’s go for coffee
Max speed
Needs to happen in the background or over night
FIXED
16 s
ADSL
1 Mbit/s
ADSL
6 Mbit/s
Ethernet
100 Mbit/s
5s
3 hrs
0.3 s
0.03 s
WIRELESS
Gigabit ethernet 1000 Mbit/s
3G Cellular
3,5 G Cellular
WLAN
11 min
0.3 s
1 hrs
Download
DVD movie
8 GBytes
1s
1 hrs
10 min
20 s 1 min
44 hrs
6 hrs
6
Download
HDTV movie
40 GBytes
1 hrs
. . . 1 hour
10 hours
...
7s = valuable time for person to wait
August 2009
ACTION
Transfer
picture
5.0 Mpixel (jpeg)
4 MBytes
15 hrs
9 hrs
2s
14 Mbit/s
89 hrs
1 min
5 min
16 s
2 Mbit/s
108 Mbit/s
18 hrs
GPP
Time
Scale illustrative
Deployment Scenario Coverage
Promise to cover sparsely populated areas with BWA using DD
Missing broadband access hamper establishment of enterprises in rural areas
DD: 790-862 MHz as result of WRC-07 arranged with 2x30 MHz + 12 MHz
A radio cell with 10 km radius covers 314 km2 area
Let’s assume 300 enterprises in this cell requiring 10 Mbit/s transfer rate every
This cell must provide 3.000 Mbit/s of continuous transmit in 30 MHz bandwidth
State of the art – HSPA – offers ~15 Mbit/s in 5 MHz bandwidth in 500 m radius
Broadband Wireless Access
is not coverage limited
It is capacity limited!
GPP
7
August 2009
Deployment Scenario Capacity
GSM/UMTS/HSPA:
data throughput too low
2012 we’ll have ~2 billion computers in the world
Example Germany: 88% urban population, Berlin: 984km2, 3750 people/km2
Assumptions:
cell radius = 0,3km, cell area = 0,3km2,
2
1000 laptops/km , 300laptops/cell, 10Mbit/s/laptop, 2bit/Hz/s,
Required capacity per cell:
300*10/2 = 1.500 Mbit/s
NEEDS OPTICAL FIBRE AND WIDE SPECTRUM CHANNELS TO SUPPORT IT
MACRO
MICRO
PICO
OF & additional cell layer to solve capacity problem
low power
very small radius
dynamic interference avoiding
high data throughput
Are the current network and spectrum concepts sufficient to support broadband?
8
August 2009
GPP
Typical product cycle
From spectrum to product
profile
&
products
Commercial
agreements
with
operators
Settled
regulatory
environment
Spectrum
Settled regulatory environment enables product availability
GPP
9
August 2009
European Decisions
• 2008/477/EC - European Commission Decision from of 13 June 2008 on the harmonization
of the 2 500-2 690 MHz frequency band for terrestrial systems capable of providing
electronic communications services in the Community
•
•
•
•
•
To be implemented by the member states in 6 months after decision issue
Supports flexible band arrangement
Let operators decide about bandwidth per operator or number of operators
Supports competitiveness and innovation
Supports data and all IP
• ECC Dec. (05)05 - ECC Decision of 18 March 2005 on harmonized utilization of spectrum for
IMT-2000/UMTS systems operating within the band 2500 – 2690 MHz
•
•
•
•
•
•
Due for revision
Supports 2 x 70 + 50 MHz arrangement
Limits bandwidth per operator or number of operators
Limits competitiveness and innovation
Limits data and all IP
Addresses UMTS only
European Commission decision supports
European economies in the race with
Asia and America
10
August 2009
GPP
International Spectrum Policy
• The 2.5-2.69 GHz band is the best world wide harmonized spectrum for broadband
•
•
•
Allocated by Radio Regulations (RR) to Mobile Service and to IMT in all 3 ITU Regions
Spectrum arrangement in this band is Recommended by ITU-R M.1036
Available in the most countries world wide
• The 2.3-2.4 GHz band is becoming more and more popular
•
•
Allocated by RR-07 to Mobile Service and to IMT in all 3 ITU Regions
Available or used for broadband in Asia (China, Korea, Malaysia, NZ, etc.), Latin America (Chile )
and in CEE countries
• The 3.4 - 3.6 - 3.8 - 4.2 GHz band is fragmented
•
•
•
•
The allocation to Mobile Service and to IMT by RR-07 vary depending on ITU Region and sub-band
Not available in Region 2 and tropical countries due to radar and satellite services
In Europe 3.4-3.6 GHz is for mobile, broadband and IMT
Europe supports future allocation of 3.6-3.8-4.2 GHz for mobile, broadband and IMT
The 2.6 GHz band is the focus band for WiMAX
GPP
11
August 2009
Intel Regulatory Policy General Principles
• Service and Technology neutrality
•
•
•
No restrictions on services, e.g. VoIP allowed
No preferential treatment for specific technologies
No restrictions on mobility
• Market can decide FDD/TDD split
• Auctions preferred; more transparent than other methods
• Timely access to spectrum needed
Create the conditions for a sustainable
and competitive broadband market
12
August 2009
GPP
Recommendations for WiMAX
• Preferably 2.3 and/or 2.6 GHz bands to deploy all network layers
• IEEE 802.16e TDD preferred
• Minimum 30MHz of spectrum per license – guard bands excluded
• Nationwide licenses to avoid market fragmentation and weaken
the operator business case
• Wholesale model can help reduce the digital divide in the rural
areas and villages
• Cooperation with local governments and municipalities to subsidy
service
Create the conditions to accelerate broadband
adoption and reduce the Digital Divide
GPP
13
August 2009
Best Practices: The Norway 2.6 GHz Allocation
The five sub-bands are:
A. The 2010 MHz band, consisting of a single 15MHz A block.
B. Five unpaired blocks of 10MHz at the centre of the 2.6GHz band
(2570 MHz to 2620 MHz).
C. Eight paired blocks of 2x5 MHz in the 2.6 GHz band
(2500-2540 MHz paired with 2620-2660 MHz).
D. Three unpaired blocks of 10 MHz below sub-band B in the 2.6 GHz band
(2540-2570 MHz).
E. Three unpaired blocks of 10 MHz at the top end of the 2.6 GHz band
(2660-2690 MHz).
A
2010
14
August 2009
GPP
2025 MHz
Best Practices: The Norway 2.6 GHz Allocation
• FDD/TDD split determined by market forces
• Only 80 MHz of FDD spectrum issued; CEPT Decision indicates 140 MHz
• 110 MHz TDD spectrum issued; more than 50 MHz in CEPT Decision
• Licences are technology and service neutral.
• License are tradable and have 15 years duration.
• Licenses can be used for fixed, nomadic and mobile wireless broadband services.
• Eight companies participated; total revenue raised NOK 228.881.000 (€ 25.863.553)
• Five companies acquired frequencies:
Arctic Wireless AS
Craig Wireless Systems Ltd.
Hafslund Telekom AS
NetCom AS
Telenor ASA
• Alvarion started to deploy networks for Hafslund Telekom AS
• 2010-2025 MHz also auctioned at same time; acquired by Inquam Broadband
GmbH for NOK 1.000.000 (€ 113.000)
• can be used for nomadic and mobile broadband services
GPP
15
August 2009
Best Practices: UK 2.6 GHz Auction – TDD/FDD Flexibility
Channel plan according to CEPT Decision (05)05 due to revision, no deployment in Europe
Flexible channel plan on market demand, TDD expands down, new TDD allocation at top, 120 MHz duplex gap maintained
ITU-R M.1036 Option “c3”, all TDD, best suited for high data throughput, low power pico cell network layer
Source: Ofcom UK
16
August 2009
GPP
Conclusions
• Ubiquitous and fast Internet access is a current customers
requirement
• Urban and rural citizens must have the same Internet access
• Applications drive data throughput requirements
• Stable regulatory environment first then products on the market
• The 2.6 and 2.3 GHz bands are best suited for broadband service
• Conditions for a sustainable and competitive broadband market are
necessary
• Broadband is a fundamental enabler for European economies being
in the race with Asia and Americas
GPP
17
August 2009
Thank You!
Christoph Legutko
Global Public Policy
Intel Corporation
T: +49 171 55 202 43
christoph.legutko@intel.com
18
August 2009
GPP
Download