Summary of Semigroup Results A is closed and densely defined λI + A −1 exists for all λ > 0 −1 ‖λI + A ‖ LH ≤ λ −1 Hille-Yosida properties for all λ > 0 H-Y properties ∀ u ∈ H and ∀ t ≥ 0, S n tu converges strongly in H to Stu. St = lim S n t has the following properties: n St is stronly continuous in t, t ≥ 0 S0 = I St is a C 0 − s/g of contractions St + s = St ∘ Ss s, t ≥ 0 ‖St‖ LH ≤ 1 Also St : D A D A AStu = StAu ∀u ∈ D A ′ S tu = −AStu = −StAu St − I lim u = −Au t t→0 ∀u ∈ D A Stu − u = − ∫ SτAu dτ ∀u ∈ D A t 0 ∀u ∈ D A Then H-Y properties − A generates a C 0 − s/g of contractions Finally, if −A generates the C 0 − s/g of contractions, St, then −λI + A generates the semigroup, Jt = e −λt St and: u= λI + A −1 v = ∞ ∫ 0 e −λτ SτλI + Au dτ ∀u ∈ D A ∫ 0 e −λτ Sτv dτ ∀v ∈ H ∞ It follows from these last two results that −A generates a C 0 − s/g of contractions H-Y properties We also have 1 A is accretive Lumer-Phillips properties I + A : D A H is onto and L-P properties − A generates a C 0 − s/g of contractions If −A generates a C 0 − s/g of contractions, St, then ∀u 0 ∈ D A and ∀f ∈ C 1 0, T : H t ut = Stu 0 + ∫ St − τfτdτ ∈ C0, T : D A ∩ C 1 0, T : D A 0 solves u ′ t + Aut = ft, 0<t<T u0 = u 0 and Examples 1.Let H = L 2 0, ∞ = H 0 R + , A = −a ∂ x , and D A = H 1 0, ∞ for a > 0. Note that u ∈ D A implies ux → 0 as x → ∞. Then ∞ Au, u H = −a ∫ 0 u ′ xuxdx = − a2 ux 2 | ∞0 = a 2 u0 2 ≥ 0 Then A is accretive for a > 0, and for arbitrary v ∈ H I + Au = ux − au ′ x = vx has the solution ∞ ux = ∫ e x 1 a x−y vydy This shows that I + A is onto (i.e., RI + A = H). Then by the L-P theorem, −A generates a C 0 − s/g, St and the unique solution of u ′ t + Aut = ∂ t ux, t − a∂ x ux, t = fx, t, ux, 0 = u 0 x ∈ D A ; is given by, t t 0 0 ux, t = Stu 0 x + ∫ St − τfx, τdτ = u 0 x + at + ∫ fx + at − τ, τdτ In order to have this solution it is sufficient to suppose u 0 ∈ D A = H 1 0, ∞ and f is C 1 in t and L 2 in x. 2. Let H = L 2 0, ∞ = H 0 R + , A = a∂ x , and D A = Note that u ∈ D A implies ux → 0 as x → ∞. Then ∞ Au, u H = a ∫ 0 u ′ xuxdx = a 2 u ∈ H 1 0, ∞ : u0 = 0 . ux 2 | ∞0 = 0 2 Then A is accretive (for any real a) and for arbitrary v ∈ H I + Au = ux + au ′ x = vx for v ∈ H has the solution x 1 ux = ∫ e − a x−y vydy. 0 Note that it is necessary to have a > 0 in order to get u ∈ D A for v ∈ H since a negative value for a would produce an exponentially growing ux which is not even in H much less in D A . This shows that RI + A = H for a > 0. .Then −A generates a C 0 − s/g, St and ut = Stu 0 is the unique solution of u ′ t + Aut = ∂ t ux, t + a∂ x ux, t = 0, u0, t = 0, ux, 0 = u 0 x ∈ D A ; i.e, ux, t = u 0 x − atHx − at = Stu 0 x. 3. Let H = L 2 R = H 0 R, ux → 0 as x 2 → ∞. Then A = ∂ x , and D A = H 1 R. Note that u ∈ D A implies ∞ Au, u H = ∫ −∞ u ′ xuxdx = 1 2 ux 2 | ∞−∞ = 0. so A is accretive. Note that −A is also accretive in this case. For arbitrary v ∈ H I ± Au = ux ± u ′ x = vx for v ∈ H implies via Fourier transformation that 1 ± iαUα = Vα Then Uα = 1 ∓ iα Vα = Wα ∓ iαWα 1 + α2 and ux = wx ∓ w ′ x wx = T −1 F Vα 1 + α2 = ∫ e −|x−y| vydy R Then the ODE has the solution x x ux = ∫ e −|x−y| vydy ∓ d ∫ e −|x−y| vydy 0 0 dx which shows that RI ± A = H. Then −A generates a C 0 − s/g, St and ut = Stu 0 is the unique solution of u ′ t + Aut = ∂ t ux, t + ∂ x ux, t = 0, ux, 0 = u 0 x ∈ D A ; i.e, ux, t = u 0 x + t = Stu 0 x. But +A also generates a C 0 − s/g, Zt and then ut = Ztu 0 is the unique solution of u ′ t − Aut = ∂ t ux, t − ∂ x ux, t = 0, ux, 0 = u 0 x ∈ D A ; i.e, 3 ux, t = u 0 x − t = Ztu 0 x = S−tu 0 x. So in this case, since both A and −A are accretive and I ± A is onto, there are two C 0 − s/g ′ s , St and S−t. Moreover, by the semigroup property, St ∘ S−t = S0 = I, which is to say St −1 = S−t; i.e., St forms a C 0 −group for t ∈ R. 4. Let H = L 2 U = H 0 U, A = −∇ 2 , and D A = H 10 U ∩ H 2 U. Then Au, u H = − ∫ u ∇ 2 u = ∫ |∇u| 2 ≥ 0 U U u ∈ DA So A is accretive. For arbitrary f ∈ H, the elliptic problem λI + Au = λu − ∇ 2 u = f in U, u = 0 on ∂U has a unique weak solution u ∈ D A since bu, v; λ = ∫ ∇u ⋅ ∇v + λuv U satisfies bu, u; λ = ‖∇u‖ 20 + λ‖u‖ 20 u ∈ DA and, in particular, bu, u; 1 = ‖u‖ 21 which implies bu, u; 1 is coercive and I + A is then an isomorphism from D A onto H. Then −A generates a C 0 − s/g, St and ut = Stu 0 is the unique solution of and u ′ t + Aut = ∂ t ux, t − ∇ 2 ux, t = 0, u = 0 on ∂U × 0, T ux, 0 = u 0 x ∈ D A ; i.e, ux, t = ∑ n u 0 , w n H e −λ n t w n x = Stu 0 x. where w n are the family of orthonormal eigenfunctions associated with −∇ 2 wx = λwx x ∈ U, w ∈ DA. 5.Consider the problem ∂ tt ux, t − ∂ xx ux, t = 0, ux, 0 = fx, ∂ t ux, 0 = gx 0 < x < 1, t > 0 0 < x < 1, t > 0, u0, t = u1, t = 0, Let Then u1 = ∂xu and 0 < x < 1. u2 = ∂tu ∂ t u 1 = ∂ xt u = ∂ x u 2 ∂ t u 2 = ∂ tt u = ∂ x u 1 i.e., 4 ∂t u1 0 1 − u2 u1 ∂x 1 0 u2 0 = 0 and u1 u2 i.e., f ′ x x, 0 = gx ⃗ t + AU ⃗ t = 0, ∂tU ⃗ 0 = U ⃗0 U where H = L 2 0, 1 2 , 0 1 A=− 1 0 ∂x ⃗ ∈ H : u 1 ∈ H 1 0, 1, u 2 ∈ H 10 0, 1 D A = U Then ⃗, U ⃗ H = − ∫ 1 ∂ x u 2 ⋅ u 1 + u 2 ⋅ ∂ x u 1 dx = − ∫ 1 d/dxu 1 u 2 dx AU 0 0 1 = −u 1 u 2 | x=1 x=0 = 0 (since u 2 ∈ H 0 0, 1 ⃗ ∈ H, consider This proves A is accretive, in fact, conservative. Now for λ ≠ 0, F λ u1 u2 +A u1 u2 = λu 1 − ∂ x u 2 λu 2 − ∂ x u 1 F1 = F2 Then λ∂ x u 1 − ∂ xx u 2 = ∂ x F 1 and ∂ x u 1 = λu 2 − F 2 , or −∂ xx u 2 + λ 2 u 2 = ∂ x F 1 + λF 2 Since ∂ x F 1 + λF 2 ∈ H −1 0, 1, this last equation has a unique weak solution u 2 ∈ H 10 0, 1, by the previously developed elliptic theory. Then λu 1 = F 1 + ∂ x u 2 ∈ L 2 0, 1, ∂ x u 1 = λu 2 − F 2 ∈ L 2 0, 1, ⃗ ∈ D A . This shows that λ + A : D A H is surjective for all λ ≠ 0. so u 1 ∈ H 1 0, 1 and U Then A generates a C 0 − s/g, actually both ±A generate C 0 − s/g ′ s so A generates a group of solution operators, Gt. This group Gt, (using a previously discovered solution to the wave equation) is seen to be given by ⃗ x, 0 = GtU 1 2 1 2 f̃ ′ x + t + ̃f ′ x − t + f̃ ′ x + t − ̃f ′ x − t + 1 2 1 2 g̃ x + t − g̃ x − t g̃ x + t + g̃ x − t where ̃f, g̃ denote the odd 2-periodic extensions of f and g. 5