Evaluation File 1-A:
Composite Findings of Effectiveness in All Teacher Education Programs Combined
● Includes Supervisor Composite Measures and Teacher Composite Measures.
● MS, SS and ES Programs Combined: This Campus and the CSU System.
● Up to Twelve Consecutive Years of Results on Common Measurement Scales.
● Four Levels of Preparation Effectiveness Reported on Each Measure.
● An Important Reliability Estimate Accompanies Each Composite Measurement.
Systemwide Evaluation of Teacher Preparation
Center for Teacher Quality
The California State University
2012
File 1-A
Composite Findings on the Effectiveness of All Teacher Preparation Programs Combined:
Employment Supervisors and Teaching Graduates Assess MS-SS-ES Teaching Credential Programs
File 1-A Assesses All of Your Basic Teaching Credential Programs in Combination with Each Other.
► Each page in File 1-A is about a CSU Composite, which measures a significant domain of the learning-to-teach curriculum. At the top, the
title of each composite measure identifies it’s focus and whether it summar izes assessments by teacher s (your graduates) or their job supervisors. For your information, the specific evaluation questions that comprised each composite measure from 2001 through 2012 are in File 6-A.
► On the left side of each graph, your campus name is abbreviated. System refers to all campuses combined. Ten rows assess the preparation
of twelve cohorts of graduates. The most r ecent cohort finished CSU academic work for teaching credentials in 2010-11, and served as
teachers in 2011-12. Additional rows assess the preparation of preceding cohorts of program completers who also served as K-12 teachers.
► Inside each bar, the four segments (colors) represent levels of pr epar ation effectiveness. A color legend is near the top of each page. The
percent near the left end is the sum of well-prepared teachers (green) plus adequately-prepared teachers (yellow).
► All findings in File 1-A are "campuswide" measurements because your recent MS, SS and ES Credential completers are combined with each
other. Files 2-A, 3-A and 4-A, respectively, provide separate assessments of your MS, SS and ES credential programs.
► In each composite graph the percentages are based on the responses to multiple questions by CSU teaching graduates or by their job
supervisors, as indicated in the composite’s title. File 6-B describes how and when the CSU Deans developed the composite measures.
► The reliability of a composite measure depends on how many judgments were rendered by the respondents, and how much their judgments
varied. The reliability of each composite score in File 1-A is on the facing page. File 7-A explains the r eliabilities and what they mean.
► In File 1-A, the layout of each reliability page mirrors the layout of the corresponding graph. Campus and system r eliabilities ar e sequenced
the same as your campus and system bar -graphs. File 7-A explains each type of evidence in your reliability pages.
► You can clarify the composite findings in File 1-A by reviewing Files 1-B, 5, 6-A and 7-A. File 1-B summarizes responses by teachers and
supervisors to specific questions that comprise the composites. File 5 describes the CSU evaluation methodology. File 6-A summarizes the
substance of the composites. File 7-A explains the reliabilities on the odd-numbered pages in File 1-A.
File 1-A: Composite Scores for All Credential Programs Combined
Page A
Contents of File 1-A: All CSU Credential Programs Combined
Composite Set A:
►
A-1
►
A-2
►
A-3
Composite Set B:
►
B-1
►
B-2
►
B-3
►
B-4
►
B-5
►
B-6
►
B-7
►
B-8
►
B-9
Composite Set C:
►
C-1
►
C-2
►
C-3
►
C-4
►
C-5
►
C-6
Composite Set D:
►
D-1
►
D-2
►
D-3
►
D-4
►
D-5.1
►
D-5.2
►
D-6
►
D-7.1
►
D-7.2
Composite Set E:
►
E-1
►
E-2
2012
Overall Effectiveness of CSU Teaching Credential Programs
Overall Effectiveness of CSU Multiple-Subject Programs
Overall Effectiveness of CSU Single-Subject Programs
Overall Effectiveness of CSU Education-Specialist Programs (Level I)
CSU Preparation to Understand and Teach Core Curriculum Subjects
Preparation to Understand and Teach Reading Language-Arts in K-8
Preparation to Understand and Teach Mathematics in Grades K-8
Preparation to Understand and Teach English in Grades 7-12
Preparation to Understand and Teach Mathematics in Grades 7-12
Preparation to Understand and Teach Science in Grades 7-12
Preparation to Understand and Teach History in Grades 7-12
Preparation to Teach Other Subjects in Grades K-8
Preparation to Teach Other Subjects in Grades 7-12
Preparation to Develop Reading Skills in Content Classes (7-12)
CSU Preparation in General Pedagogical Principles and Practices
Preparation to Plan Instruction for All Students and Subjects (K-12)
Preparation to Motivate Students to be Active Learners(K-12)
Preparation to Manage Instruction for Effective Learning(K-12)
Preparation to Use Education Technology Effectively(K-12)
Preparation to Use Good Pedagogy Across the Curriculum(K-12)
Preparation to Assess and Reflect on K-12 Teaching(K-12)
CSU Preparation to Teach California’s Students Effectively
Preparation for Equity and Diversity in K-12 Education
Preparation to Teach Young Children in Grades K-3
Preparation to Teach Middle-Grade Students in Grades 4-8
Preparation to Teach High School Students in Grades 7-12
Longitudinal Preparation to Teach English Learners in Grades K-12
Focused Preparation to Teach English Learners in Grades K-12
Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Special Education (ES)
Longitudinal Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools (MS-SS)
Focused Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools (MS-SS)
The Overall Quality and Value of CSU Teacher Preparation
The Overall Value of Professional Coursework in Education (K-12)
The Overall Value of Fieldwork Experiences in Education (K-12)
File 1-A: Composite Scores for All Credential Programs Combined
Composite
Scores
Reliability Items in Each
Composite
of Scores
Pages in File 1-A
1
2
5
6
9
10
Pages in File 1-A
13
14
17
18
21
22
25
26
29
30
33
34
37
38
41
42
45
46
Pages in File 1-A
49
50
53
54
57
58
61
62
65
66
69
70
Pages in File 1-A
73
74
77
78
81
82
85
86
89
90
93
94
95
96
99
100
103
104
Pages in File 1-A
105
106
107
108
Pages in 6-A
1
2
3
Pages in 6-A
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
13
Pages in 6-A
13
14
15
16
17
18
Pages in 6-A
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Pages in 6-A
28
29
Page B
Overview of Evaluation Composite Measures Established by the CSU Deans of Education
File 6-A Describes the Contents of Each Composite Measure.
Composite
Set A
Composite
A-1
Composite
A-2
Composite
A-3
Composite
Set B
Composite
B-1
Composite
B-2
Composite
B-3
Composite
B-4
Composite
B-5
Composite
B-6
Composite
B-7
Composite
B-9
Composite
Set C
Composite
C-1
Composite
C-2
Composite
C-3
The Overall Effectiveness of Basic Teaching Credential
Programs in the CSU System and on this CSU Campus
Overall Effectiveness of Multiple-Subject Credential Programs
(Assessed by MS Program Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Overall Effectiveness of Single-Subject Credential Programs
(Assessed by SS Program Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Overall Effectiveness of Education-Specialist Level I Programs
(Assessed by ES Program Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Understand and Teach Core Subjects of the
School Curriculum at Distinct Levels
Preparation to Understand and Teach Reading-Language Arts K-8
(Assessed by Multiple-Subject Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Understand and Teach Mathematics in Grades K-8
(Assessed by Multiple-Subject Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Understand and Teach English in Grades 7-12
(Assessed by SS-English Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Understand and Teach Mathematics in Grades 7-12
(Assessed by SS-Mathematics Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Understand and Teach Science in Grades 7-12
(Assessed by SS-Science Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Understand and Teach History-Social Science 7-12
(Assessed by SS-History Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Understand and Teach Other Subjects K-8 and 7-12
(Assessed by MS and SS Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Develop Reading Skills in Content Classes in 7-12
(Assessed by Single-Subject Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation in General Pedagogical Principles and Practices
Across Subjects and School Levels
Preparation to Plan Instruction for All Students and Subjects (K12) (Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Motivate Students to be Active Learners (K-12)
(Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Manage Instruction for Learning (K-12)
(Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
File 1-A: Composite Scores for All Credential Programs Combined
File 6-B Describes the Validity of the Composite Measures.
Set C
Continued
Preparation in General Pedagogical Principles and
Practices Across Subjects and School Levels
Composite
C-4
Composite
C-5
Composite
C-6
Preparation to Use Education Technology Effectively (K-12)
(Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Use Good Pedagogy Across the Curriculum
(Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Assess and Reflect on K-12 Teaching (K-12)
(Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Composite
Set D
Preparation to Teach California's Students in Diverse
Groups and Stages of Development
Composite
D-1
Composite
D-2
Composite
D-3
Composite
D-4
Composite
D-5.1
Composite
D-5.2
Composite
D-6
Composite
D-7.1
Composite
D-7.2
Composite
Set E
Composite
E-1
Composite
E-2
Preparation for Equity and Diversity in K-12 Education
(Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Teach Young Children in Grades K-3
(Assessed by MS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Teach Middle-Grade Students in Grades 4-8
(Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Teach High School Students in Grades 9-12
(Assessed by SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Longitudinal Preparation to Teach English Learners in Grades K-12
(Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Focused Preparation to Teach English Learners in Grades K-12
(Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Special Education
(Assessed by ES Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Longitudinal Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools
(Assessed by MS-SS Graduates and Their Supervisors)
Focused Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools
(Assessed by MS-SS Graduates and Their Supervisors)
The Overall Quality and Value of CSU Teacher
Preparation in Basic Credential Programs
The Overall Value of CSU Professional Coursework in Education
(Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates)
The Overall Value and Quality of Fieldwork Experiences in
Education (Assessed by MS-SS-ES Graduates)
Page C
Supervisor Composite A-1: K-8 Supervisors Assess the Overall Effectiveness of
CSU Multiple-Subject Credential Programs
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
45%
Fresno 10-11 80%
Fresno 09-10 82%
Fresno 07-08 79%
39%
Fresno 06-07 79%
39%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 99-02 78%
System 05-06 80%
2%
18%
36%
2%
14%
42%
38%
44%
48%
2%
12%
34%
45%
2%
15%
42%
37%
38%
42%
2%
20%
46%
43%
3%
23%
43%
36%
1%
4%
13%
37%
41%
System 07-08 82%
4%
19%
48%
System 08-09 82%
System 06-07 81%
40%
38%
3%
19%
51%
System 10-11 84%
System 09-10 86%
18%
40%
27%
4%
16%
40%
Fresno 04-05 84%
Fresno 02-03 84%
16%
49%
38%
Fresno 03-04 75%
Not-at-All Prepared
35%
33%
Fresno 08-09 78%
Fresno 05-06 78%
Somewhat Prepared
16%
2%
15%
2%
15%
38%
2%
3%
17%
2%
System 04-05 81%
44%
37%
16%
4%
System 03-04 81%
43%
38%
17%
3%
17%
3%
System 02-03 80%
System 99-02 81%
0%
39%
41%
42%
39%
25%
50%
17%
75%
2%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 1
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite A-1: K-8 Supervisors Assess the Overall Effectiveness of
CSU Multiple-Subject Credential Programs
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
48
36
1,456
1,223
43%
31%
47%
34%
33%
47%
37%
50%
15%
14%
17%
17%
4%
2%
5%
4%
79%
80%
81%
83%
Fresno 08-09
34
1,174
36%
40%
38%
42%
17%
19%
4%
5%
76%
79%
Fresno 07-08
124
4,387
38%
40%
39%
41%
18%
19%
2%
3%
78%
80%
Fresno 06-07
76
2,709
38%
40%
39%
42%
18%
20%
1%
2%
78%
80%
Fresno 05-06
32
1,192
25%
28%
49%
53%
17%
19%
4%
5%
76%
79%
Fresno 04-05
96
3,307
47%
49%
35%
37%
13%
14%
2%
3%
83%
85%
Fresno 03-04
147
3,800
37%
39%
36%
38%
22%
23%
2%
3%
74%
76%
Fresno 02-03
65
2,278
40%
43%
41%
44%
13%
15%
2%
2%
83%
85%
Fresno 99-02
178
4,272
35%
37%
41%
43%
19%
21%
2%
2%
77%
79%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
362
258
10,230
8,448
45%
44%
46%
45%
37%
41%
38%
42%
14%
12%
15%
13%
2%
2%
2%
2%
83%
85%
84%
86%
System 08-09
388
12,768
47%
48%
33%
34%
16%
17%
2%
2%
81%
82%
System 07-08
1,036
35,563
45%
46%
37%
38%
15%
15%
2%
2%
82%
83%
System 06-07
1,426
49,427
43%
44%
38%
39%
15%
16%
3%
3%
82%
82%
System 05-06
676
23,100
42%
42%
38%
39%
17%
18%
2%
3%
80%
81%
System 04-05
1,200
40,577
44%
45%
36%
37%
15%
16%
3%
4%
81%
81%
System 03-04
1,974
47,935
42%
43%
37%
38%
17%
17%
3%
3%
80%
80%
System 02-03
1,255
43,734
39%
39%
41%
41%
17%
17%
3%
3%
80%
81%
System 99-02
3,365
68,432
41%
42%
39%
39%
17%
17%
2%
2%
80%
81%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 2
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite A-1: First-Year Multiple-Subject Teachers Assess
the Overall Effectiveness of Their CSU Credential Programs
Well Prepared
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 03-04 68%
Fresno 02-03 73%
Fresno 99-02 72%
19%
6%
21%
5%
41%
38%
Fresno 07-08 78%
Fresno 04-05 65%
41%
35%
Fresno 08-09 76%
Not-at-All Prepared
40%
33%
Fresno 09-10 74%
Fresno 05-06 65%
Somewhat Prepared
35%
Fresno 10-11 75%
Fresno 06-07 70%
Adequately Prepared
20%
4%
17%
5%
40%
29%
41%
25%
25%
40%
23%
42%
28%
27%
8%
27%
8%
40%
32%
25%
41%
35%
6%
7%
22%
37%
23%
5%
System 10-11 77%
39%
System 09-10 77%
39%
38%
18%
4%
System 08-09 79%
39%
40%
18%
4%
System 07-08 77%
38%
4%
37%
18%
40%
19%
5%
4%
System 06-07 72%
33%
39%
23%
5%
System 05-06 72%
33%
39%
22%
6%
System 04-05 74%
35%
System 03-04 73%
35%
System 02-03 75%
System 99-02 73%
0%
39%
21%
38%
37%
22%
38%
34%
21%
39%
25%
50%
22%
75%
5%
6%
5%
5%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 3
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite A-1: First-Year Multiple-Subject Teachers Assess
the Overall Effectiveness of Their CSU Credential Programs
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
90
53
2,772
1,768
34%
31%
36%
34%
39%
39%
41%
42%
18%
20%
20%
22%
5%
5%
7%
6%
74%
72%
76%
75%
Fresno 08-09
89
3,067
34%
36%
40%
42%
19%
21%
3%
4%
75%
77%
Fresno 07-08
135
4,847
37%
39%
39%
41%
17%
18%
4%
5%
77%
79%
Fresno 06-07
123
4,319
28%
30%
40%
42%
24%
26%
5%
6%
69%
71%
Fresno 05-06
72
2,575
24%
26%
39%
41%
26%
28%
7%
9%
63%
66%
Fresno 04-05
168
5,868
23%
24%
41%
43%
26%
27%
7%
8%
65%
66%
Fresno 03-04
105
3,865
27%
29%
39%
41%
24%
26%
6%
7%
67%
69%
Fresno 02-03
105
3,871
31%
33%
40%
42%
22%
23%
4%
5%
72%
74%
Fresno 99-02
239
4,403
34%
36%
36%
38%
22%
23%
5%
5%
72%
73%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
748
676
22,512
21,976
38%
39%
39%
40%
38%
38%
39%
39%
18%
18%
19%
19%
4%
4%
5%
4%
77%
77%
77%
78%
System 08-09
831
28,368
38%
39%
39%
40%
17%
18%
4%
4%
78%
79%
System 07-08
1,611
56,248
37%
37%
39%
40%
19%
19%
4%
5%
76%
77%
System 06-07
2,185
77,327
33%
33%
39%
40%
22%
23%
5%
5%
72%
73%
System 05-06
1,087
39,353
33%
33%
38%
39%
22%
23%
6%
6%
71%
72%
System 04-05
2,189
78,878
35%
35%
38%
39%
21%
21%
5%
5%
73%
74%
System 03-04
2,214
80,739
35%
35%
37%
38%
21%
22%
6%
6%
72%
73%
System 02-03
1,707
63,338
37%
37%
37%
38%
20%
21%
5%
5%
74%
75%
System 99-02
4,744
96,410
33%
34%
39%
39%
22%
22%
5%
5%
73%
73%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 4
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite A-2: Secondary Supervisors Assess
the Overall Effectiveness of CSU Single-Subject Credential Programs
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 70%
Adequately Prepared
26%
43%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
40%
System 09-10 81%
System 08-09 80%
System 07-08 83%
21%
17%
42%
40%
46%
System 04-05 79%
45%
System 02-03 81%
44%
System 99-02 82%
43%
25%
14%
34%
17%
36%
14%
34%
17%
36%
14%
37%
16%
39%
50%
2%
3%
17%
35%
47%
4%
4%
16%
38%
48%
System 05-06 82%
18%
37%
42%
3%
18%
38%
44%
0%
3%
13%
36%
38%
46%
0%
14%
33%
43%
2%
3%
40%
50%
System 06-07 80%
System 03-04 83%
21%
38%
Fresno 03-04 83%
System 10-11 78%
16%
33%
38%
2%
2%
22%
47%
Fresno 05-06 87%
Fresno 99-02 80%
16%
37%
Fresno 06-07 76%
6%
36%
39%
42%
Fresno 02-03 79%
23%
46%
Fresno 07-08 82%
Fresno 04-05 76%
Not-at-All Prepared
44%
Fresno 09-10 82%
Fresno 08-09 76%
Somewhat Prepared
15%
75%
2%
3%
4%
4%
3%
3%
3%
2%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 5
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite A-2: Secondary Supervisors Assess
the Overall Effectiveness of CSU Single-Subject Credential Programs
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
58
68
1,470
1,849
25%
45%
27%
48%
43%
34%
46%
37%
22%
15%
25%
17%
5%
2%
7%
3%
69%
81%
72%
83%
Fresno 08-09
59
1,708
37%
40%
36%
39%
21%
24%
1%
2%
75%
77%
Fresno 07-08
77
2,262
40%
43%
38%
41%
15%
17%
2%
3%
80%
82%
Fresno 06-07
49
1,320
41%
44%
31%
34%
20%
23%
3%
4%
74%
77%
Fresno 05-06
27
689
44%
49%
37%
42%
12%
15%
0%
0%
85%
88%
Fresno 04-05
56
1,583
36%
39%
36%
39%
20%
22%
3%
4%
74%
77%
Fresno 03-04
73
1,627
49%
52%
32%
35%
12%
15%
3%
4%
82%
84%
Fresno 02-03
38
1,084
41%
45%
34%
37%
16%
19%
3%
5%
77%
80%
Fresno 99-02
91
1,911
37%
39%
41%
44%
17%
19%
2%
2%
79%
81%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
438
372
11,084
9,876
39%
43%
41%
45%
38%
36%
39%
37%
18%
16%
18%
17%
3%
3%
4%
3%
78%
80%
79%
81%
System 08-09
554
15,073
42%
43%
38%
39%
17%
17%
2%
3%
80%
81%
System 07-08
839
23,102
47%
48%
35%
36%
14%
14%
3%
3%
83%
83%
System 06-07
824
22,787
45%
46%
34%
35%
16%
17%
3%
4%
80%
80%
System 05-06
512
13,582
46%
47%
36%
37%
13%
14%
4%
4%
82%
83%
System 04-05
727
19,566
45%
46%
33%
34%
17%
18%
3%
4%
79%
80%
System 03-04
1,140
21,670
46%
47%
36%
37%
14%
14%
3%
3%
83%
83%
System 02-03
610
16,969
43%
44%
37%
38%
16%
16%
3%
3%
80%
81%
System 99-02
2,034
35,513
43%
44%
39%
40%
15%
15%
2%
2%
82%
83%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 6
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite A-2: First-Year Single-Subject Teachers Assess
the Overall Effectiveness of Their CSU Credential Programs
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 69%
27%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 05-06 67%
Fresno 04-05 69%
Fresno 03-04 72%
System 10-11 74%
39%
31%
37%
24%
26%
35%
42%
36%
System 08-09 77%
39%
System 07-08 75%
38%
5%
6%
11%
7%
7%
21%
38%
39%
24%
24%
39%
31%
6%
26%
35%
33%
22%
26%
41%
34%
6%
26%
40%
System 09-10 73%
System 06-07 75%
25%
42%
Fresno 02-03 73%
Fresno 99-02 73%
Not-at-All Prepared
42%
29%
Fresno 07-08 68%
Fresno 06-07 64%
Somewhat Prepared
34%
Fresno 09-10 73%
Fresno 08-09 71%
Adequately Prepared
38%
34%
38%
22%
4%
22%
4%
20%
5%
21%
5%
19%
37%
39%
8%
20%
36%
20%
5%
6%
5%
System 05-06 73%
36%
37%
21%
6%
System 04-05 73%
36%
37%
22%
6%
System 03-04 74%
38%
36%
System 02-03 74%
37%
37%
System 99-02 75%
37%
0%
20%
38%
25%
50%
6%
20%
5%
21%
5%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 7
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite A-2: First-Year Single-Subject Teachers Assess
the Overall Effectiveness of Their CSU Credential Programs
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
96
66
2,553
1,946
26%
32%
28%
35%
41%
37%
43%
40%
24%
21%
26%
23%
6%
5%
7%
6%
67%
71%
70%
74%
Fresno 08-09
64
1,939
27%
30%
41%
44%
23%
25%
5%
6%
70%
72%
Fresno 07-08
80
2,403
30%
32%
36%
38%
25%
28%
5%
6%
67%
69%
Fresno 06-07
56
1,813
23%
26%
38%
41%
24%
27%
10%
11%
62%
65%
Fresno 05-06
41
1,307
24%
27%
39%
42%
25%
28%
6%
8%
65%
68%
Fresno 04-05
70
2,144
33%
35%
33%
36%
23%
25%
7%
8%
67%
70%
Fresno 03-04
44
1,427
31%
35%
37%
40%
20%
22%
7%
8%
70%
73%
Fresno 02-03
48
1,586
37%
40%
34%
37%
21%
24%
3%
5%
72%
75%
Fresno 99-02
126
2,212
30%
32%
41%
44%
21%
23%
4%
5%
72%
75%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
715
643
18,512
18,159
36%
39%
37%
40%
38%
34%
39%
35%
20%
21%
21%
22%
5%
5%
6%
5%
74%
73%
75%
74%
System 08-09
718
21,860
38%
39%
37%
38%
19%
19%
4%
5%
76%
77%
System 07-08
994
30,876
37%
38%
36%
37%
20%
21%
5%
6%
74%
75%
System 06-07
1,020
31,712
39%
39%
36%
37%
20%
20%
5%
5%
75%
76%
System 05-06
794
25,192
35%
36%
36%
37%
21%
22%
6%
6%
72%
73%
System 04-05
1,031
32,453
36%
37%
36%
37%
21%
22%
5%
6%
73%
73%
System 03-04
1,203
38,641
38%
39%
36%
37%
19%
20%
6%
6%
75%
75%
System 02-03
920
30,413
37%
38%
37%
38%
20%
20%
5%
6%
74%
75%
System 99-02
2,774
50,550
36%
37%
38%
38%
20%
21%
5%
5%
74%
75%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 8
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite A-3: Special Education Supervisors Assess
the Overall Effectiveness of CSU Education Specialist Programs (L-I)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
53%
Fresno 10-11 77%
Not-at-All Prepared
24%
36%
Fresno 09-10 59%
18%
23%
5%
35%
7%
Fresno 08-09 84%
45%
39%
15%
0%
Fresno 07-08 85%
45%
40%
15%
0%
Fresno 06-07 82%
46%
Fresno 05-06 48%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Somewhat Prepared
Fresno 04-05 84%
Fresno 03-04 78%
36%
19%
29%
19%
34%
49%
19%
35%
44%
16%
34%
Fresno 02-03 76%
52%
Fresno 99-02 79%
53%
17%
24%
18%
26%
6%
18%
3%
55%
30%
13%
System 09-10 86%
54%
32%
11%
51%
System 07-08 84%
52%
System 06-07 83%
System 05-06 78%
31%
34%
43%
2%
3%
16%
32%
49%
1%
5%
System 10-11 85%
System 08-09 82%
0%
35%
2%
15%
2%
15%
2%
16%
6%
System 04-05 83%
53%
30%
13%
4%
System 03-04 84%
53%
31%
12%
4%
System 02-03 81%
System 99-02 82%
0%
51%
30%
46%
25%
16%
36%
50%
15%
75%
2%
3%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 9
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite A-3: Special Education Supervisors Assess
the Overall Effectiveness of CSU Education Specialist Programs (L-I)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
20
7
534
216
50%
31%
56%
40%
21%
19%
26%
27%
16%
31%
21%
39%
4%
5%
6%
9%
74%
54%
79%
63%
Fresno 08-09
15
584
42%
48%
37%
42%
13%
17%
0%
1%
82%
86%
Fresno 07-08
19
716
42%
47%
38%
43%
13%
16%
0%
1%
83%
87%
Fresno 06-07
6
180
41%
51%
31%
40%
15%
22%
0%
0%
78%
85%
Fresno 05-06
7
257
15%
22%
25%
32%
30%
38%
16%
22%
43%
51%
Fresno 04-05
31
1,001
47%
51%
33%
37%
14%
17%
0%
1%
82%
85%
Fresno 03-04
26
475
41%
47%
31%
37%
14%
19%
4%
7%
76%
81%
Fresno 02-03
21
706
50%
54%
21%
26%
16%
20%
5%
8%
73%
78%
Fresno 99-02
22
612
50%
55%
24%
28%
16%
20%
3%
4%
77%
81%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
180
127
5,403
4,711
54%
53%
56%
54%
29%
31%
31%
33%
13%
10%
14%
12%
2%
3%
2%
4%
84%
85%
85%
86%
System 08-09
182
6,349
50%
52%
30%
32%
15%
16%
2%
3%
81%
82%
System 07-08
294
10,633
51%
52%
31%
32%
14%
15%
1%
2%
83%
84%
System 06-07
251
8,634
49%
50%
33%
34%
14%
15%
2%
2%
82%
84%
System 05-06
176
6,060
42%
44%
34%
36%
15%
16%
5%
6%
78%
79%
System 04-05
298
10,551
53%
54%
29%
31%
12%
13%
4%
4%
83%
84%
System 03-04
443
11,308
53%
54%
30%
31%
12%
13%
4%
4%
84%
85%
System 02-03
231
8,410
51%
52%
29%
31%
16%
17%
2%
3%
81%
82%
System 99-02
702
12,847
46%
47%
35%
36%
15%
15%
3%
3%
82%
82%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 10
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite A-3: First-Year Education Specialists Assess
the Overall Effectiveness of Their CSU Level I Credential Programs
Well Prepared
32%
Fresno 10-11 66%
Fresno 07-08 68%
Fresno 06-07 65%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 05-06 68%
Fresno 04-05 69%
30%
34%
System 99-02 72%
0%
16%
25%
6%
17%
24%
21%
37%
21%
34%
32%
19%
39%
34%
32%
35%
22%
7%
7%
7%
24%
7%
38%
22%
8%
38%
21%
36%
41%
20%
34%
36%
18%
36%
37%
25%
2%
35%
37%
35%
7%
9%
42%
40%
System 09-10 74%
System 02-03 72%
16%
38%
36%
System 03-04 75%
7%
48%
System 10-11 73%
5%
27%
38%
36%
System 04-05 74%
7%
27%
34%
31%
6%
26%
35%
Fresno 99-02 78%
System 05-06 72%
16%
47%
29%
7%
41%
21%
Fresno 02-03 67%
System 06-07 70%
27%
41%
28%
System 07-08 69%
Not-at-All Prepared
34%
25%
Fresno 03-04 76%
System 08-09 71%
Somewhat Prepared
37%
Fresno 09-10 78%
Fresno 08-09 66%
Adequately Prepared
50%
7%
5%
7%
20%
7%
21%
7%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 11
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite A-3: First-Year Education Specialists Assess
the Overall Effectiveness of Their CSU Level I Credential Programs
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
29
17
839
521
30%
35%
34%
40%
32%
38%
36%
44%
25%
14%
29%
18%
6%
5%
8%
7%
64%
76%
68%
81%
Fresno 08-09
25
954
24%
27%
39%
43%
24%
28%
6%
8%
65%
69%
Fresno 07-08
16
570
19%
23%
44%
50%
24%
29%
4%
6%
65%
71%
Fresno 06-07
8
286
27%
34%
32%
39%
24%
31%
5%
9%
62%
69%
Fresno 05-06
8
289
31%
38%
30%
37%
13%
18%
13%
19%
65%
72%
Fresno 04-05
44
1,311
30%
33%
36%
39%
23%
26%
6%
7%
67%
71%
Fresno 03-04
19
714
26%
30%
45%
50%
16%
19%
6%
8%
73%
78%
Fresno 02-03
21
764
27%
31%
36%
40%
22%
26%
8%
11%
65%
69%
Fresno 99-02
24
484
33%
38%
39%
45%
18%
23%
1%
2%
76%
80%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
299
208
9,031
7,198
35%
40%
36%
41%
36%
33%
37%
35%
20%
19%
21%
20%
7%
6%
7%
7%
72%
73%
73%
75%
System 08-09
224
8,581
32%
33%
38%
39%
22%
23%
6%
7%
70%
72%
System 07-08
385
13,854
33%
34%
35%
36%
23%
24%
7%
8%
68%
69%
System 06-07
387
14,085
31%
32%
38%
39%
22%
23%
7%
8%
69%
70%
System 05-06
297
10,840
34%
35%
37%
38%
20%
21%
7%
7%
72%
73%
System 04-05
472
17,285
38%
39%
35%
36%
20%
21%
5%
6%
74%
75%
System 03-04
506
19,275
41%
41%
33%
34%
18%
19%
6%
7%
75%
75%
System 02-03
448
16,796
36%
37%
36%
37%
20%
20%
7%
8%
72%
73%
System 99-02
1,057
21,763
35%
36%
36%
37%
21%
21%
7%
7%
72%
72%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 12
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite B-1: K-8 Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation
of Multiple-Subject Teachers for Reading-Language Arts Instruction (K-8)
Well Prepared
Fresno 07-08 82%
38%
Fresno 06-07 77%
38%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
5%
15%
39%
1%
15%
50%
38%
35%
3%
12%
42%
1%
21%
44%
2%
41%
37%
3%
22%
55%
Fresno 02-03 85%
0%
19%
44%
26%
1%
25%
37%
Fresno 04-05 88%
Fresno 99-02 82%
18%
46%
38%
Fresno 03-04 77%
Not-at-All Prepared
39%
29%
Fresno 08-09 75%
Fresno 05-06 81%
Somewhat Prepared
42%
Fresno 10-11 81%
Fresno 09-10 75%
Adequately Prepared
14%
45%
15%
1%
3%
System 10-11 85%
45%
40%
14%
1%
System 09-10 86%
44%
42%
13%
1%
System 08-09 80%
46%
34%
17%
3%
System 07-08 84%
44%
40%
14%
2%
System 06-07 84%
44%
40%
14%
2%
System 05-06 81%
System 04-05 84%
System 03-04 81%
40%
41%
44%
17%
40%
41%
14%
40%
17%
1%
2%
2%
System 02-03 83%
45%
38%
16%
2%
System 99-02 83%
44%
39%
15%
2%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 13
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite B-1: K-8 Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation
of Multiple-Subject Teachers for Reading-Language Arts Instruction (K-8)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
59
42
244
219
39%
26%
46%
32%
35%
42%
42%
49%
15%
22%
21%
28%
0%
0%
2%
1%
78%
71%
84%
78%
Fresno 08-09
45
226
35%
42%
34%
41%
17%
22%
4%
7%
72%
78%
Fresno 07-08
140
895
36%
39%
43%
46%
14%
16%
2%
4%
81%
83%
Fresno 06-07
80
526
35%
40%
37%
42%
20%
24%
0%
1%
75%
79%
Fresno 05-06
39
254
23%
29%
52%
59%
13%
18%
2%
4%
79%
84%
Fresno 04-05
119
676
47%
52%
35%
40%
11%
14%
0%
1%
86%
89%
Fresno 03-04
166
743
33%
37%
40%
44%
19%
23%
1%
2%
76%
79%
Fresno 02-03
81
71
39%
49%
36%
46%
11%
17%
0%
3%
81%
88%
Fresno 99-02
196
155
34%
41%
41%
48%
13%
18%
2%
4%
79%
84%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
483
377
1,661
1,658
44%
42%
47%
45%
39%
41%
41%
43%
13%
12%
15%
14%
0%
1%
1%
2%
84%
85%
86%
87%
System 08-09
549
2,455
45%
47%
33%
36%
16%
17%
2%
3%
80%
82%
System 07-08
1,314
7,203
44%
45%
40%
41%
13%
14%
2%
2%
84%
85%
System 06-07
1,669
10,003
44%
45%
39%
40%
14%
15%
1%
2%
84%
85%
System 05-06
843
4,691
40%
41%
40%
42%
16%
18%
1%
2%
81%
82%
System 04-05
1,455
8,220
43%
45%
39%
40%
14%
14%
2%
3%
83%
84%
System 03-04
2,350
9,603
41%
42%
40%
41%
16%
17%
2%
2%
81%
82%
System 02-03
1,452
1,279
44%
46%
37%
39%
15%
16%
1%
2%
82%
84%
System 99-02
3,776
2,345
43%
45%
38%
40%
14%
16%
2%
2%
82%
84%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 14
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite B-1: First-Year Multiple-Subject Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation for Reading-Language Arts Instruction (K-8)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
52%
Fresno 10-11 89%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
33%
14%
35%
System 08-09 86%
53%
System 07-08 84%
53%
32%
10%
33%
2%
2%
3%
11%
31%
13%
33%
46%
1%
11%
29%
50%
3%
14%
58%
System 09-10 87%
System 05-06 80%
5%
12%
55%
System 10-11 87%
System 06-07 83%
2%
42%
48%
3%
4%
15%
30%
45%
2%
18%
54%
Fresno 03-04 84%
Fresno 99-02 83%
17%
35%
47%
Fresno 04-05 80%
13%
30%
46%
Fresno 05-06 81%
2%
14%
32%
49%
Fresno 06-07 79%
2%
12%
30%
53%
Fresno 07-08 85%
9%
28%
54%
Fresno 08-09 84%
Not-at-All Prepared
37%
59%
Fresno 09-10 87%
Fresno 02-03 87%
Somewhat Prepared
13%
34%
16%
2%
3%
4%
4%
System 04-05 83%
52%
31%
13%
4%
System 03-04 83%
52%
31%
13%
4%
14%
3%
49%
System 02-03 82%
System 99-02 76%
0%
33%
39%
37%
25%
50%
19%
75%
5%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 15
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite B-1: First-Year Multiple-Subject Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation for Reading-Language Arts Instruction (K-8)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
104
62
492
356
49%
56%
55%
62%
34%
25%
39%
31%
8%
10%
11%
14%
1%
1%
3%
2%
87%
85%
90%
89%
Fresno 08-09
102
655
52%
56%
28%
32%
12%
15%
2%
3%
82%
86%
Fresno 07-08
145
1,048
51%
54%
30%
34%
12%
14%
2%
3%
83%
86%
Fresno 06-07
128
903
47%
51%
29%
32%
15%
18%
3%
5%
78%
81%
Fresno 05-06
77
579
43%
48%
33%
37%
16%
19%
1%
2%
79%
83%
Fresno 04-05
186
1,314
45%
48%
32%
35%
13%
16%
5%
6%
79%
81%
Fresno 03-04
115
849
52%
56%
28%
32%
12%
15%
2%
3%
82%
85%
Fresno 02-03
113
203
42%
49%
39%
46%
9%
14%
0%
1%
86%
90%
Fresno 99-02
250
471
46%
51%
33%
37%
13%
16%
2%
3%
82%
85%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
927
834
4,077
4,621
54%
57%
56%
59%
32%
28%
33%
30%
10%
10%
11%
11%
2%
3%
2%
3%
87%
86%
88%
87%
System 08-09
991
6,174
52%
54%
32%
34%
11%
12%
2%
3%
86%
87%
System 07-08
1,940
12,507
52%
53%
30%
31%
13%
13%
3%
4%
83%
84%
System 06-07
2,527
17,100
50%
51%
33%
33%
13%
13%
3%
4%
83%
84%
System 05-06
1,331
8,736
46%
47%
33%
35%
15%
16%
4%
4%
80%
81%
System 04-05
2,529
17,394
51%
52%
31%
31%
13%
14%
4%
4%
82%
83%
System 03-04
2,575
17,828
51%
52%
31%
32%
13%
14%
4%
4%
82%
83%
System 02-03
2,017
3,409
48%
50%
33%
34%
14%
15%
3%
3%
82%
83%
System 99-02
5,188
8,954
39%
40%
37%
38%
19%
19%
5%
5%
76%
77%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 16
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite B-2: K-8 Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation
of Multiple-Subject Teachers for Mathematics Instruction (K-8)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
49%
Fresno 10-11 87%
Fresno 09-10 77%
25%
Fresno 07-08 82%
42%
40%
39%
52%
Fresno 99-02 84%
System 10-11 87%
System 09-10 86%
33%
41%
System 07-08 86%
47%
39%
System 03-04 84%
System 02-03 84%
System 99-02 83%
0%
39%
42%
25%
41%
50%
1%
2%
13%
1%
13%
1%
12%
41%
45%
0%
14%
40%
43%
1%
14%
43%
45%
1%
12%
40%
41%
3%
12%
43%
45%
2%
16%
46%
43%
0%
10%
51%
36%
System 04-05 85%
1%
43%
48%
System 05-06 84%
18%
17%
System 08-09 84%
System 06-07 85%
1%
9%
46%
46%
Fresno 02-03 89%
18%
42%
34%
2%
23%
47%
Fresno 04-05 89%
1%
17%
42%
25%
0%
22%
40%
Fresno 03-04 80%
12%
52%
41%
Fresno 05-06 77%
Not-at-All Prepared
38%
Fresno 08-09 81%
Fresno 06-07 81%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Somewhat Prepared
75%
2%
3%
14%
2%
14%
2%
15%
1%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 17
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite B-2: K-8 Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation
of Multiple-Subject Teachers for Mathematics Instruction (K-8)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
59
42
127
115
45%
21%
54%
29%
34%
47%
43%
56%
9%
18%
15%
26%
0%
0%
0%
1%
85%
73%
91%
81%
Fresno 08-09
45
110
36%
46%
35%
45%
13%
21%
1%
3%
77%
85%
Fresno 07-08
140
435
39%
44%
38%
43%
16%
20%
0%
1%
80%
84%
Fresno 06-07
80
273
36%
42%
39%
45%
16%
21%
0%
1%
79%
84%
Fresno 05-06
39
131
21%
29%
47%
56%
20%
27%
0%
0%
73%
80%
Fresno 04-05
119
342
45%
50%
39%
44%
7%
11%
1%
3%
87%
91%
Fresno 03-04
166
375
32%
37%
43%
49%
15%
19%
2%
4%
78%
83%
Fresno 02-03
81
72
41%
51%
38%
48%
7%
13%
0%
3%
86%
92%
Fresno 99-02
196
154
30%
36%
47%
54%
13%
18%
0%
1%
81%
86%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
483
377
858
870
44%
42%
48%
45%
40%
42%
43%
45%
11%
11%
13%
13%
0%
1%
1%
2%
86%
86%
88%
88%
System 08-09
549
1,297
46%
49%
35%
37%
13%
15%
2%
3%
83%
85%
System 07-08
1,314
3,629
46%
48%
38%
40%
12%
13%
1%
2%
85%
87%
System 06-07
1,669
4,983
44%
46%
40%
41%
13%
14%
1%
2%
85%
86%
System 05-06
843
2,371
40%
42%
42%
44%
13%
15%
1%
2%
83%
85%
System 04-05
1,455
4,115
44%
46%
39%
41%
12%
13%
2%
3%
84%
86%
System 03-04
2,350
4,829
42%
43%
40%
42%
14%
15%
2%
2%
83%
84%
System 02-03
1,452
1,247
44%
46%
38%
41%
14%
15%
1%
2%
83%
85%
System 99-02
3,776
2,265
41%
43%
40%
42%
15%
16%
1%
2%
82%
84%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 18
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite B-2: First-Year Multiple-Subject Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation for Mathematics Instruction (K-8)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
45%
Fresno 10-11 83%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 06-07 78%
42%
Fresno 05-06 81%
42%
Fresno 02-03 77%
Fresno 99-02 74%
14%
36%
20%
39%
15%
40%
20%
45%
Fresno 03-04 83%
13%
37%
34%
13%
37%
37%
19%
37%
System 10-11 83%
48%
System 09-10 83%
48%
System 08-09 84%
46%
System 07-08 82%
46%
System 06-07 81%
45%
System 05-06 80%
44%
35%
35%
38%
36%
4%
3%
4%
4%
3%
13%
4%
14%
4%
14%
36%
3%
4%
23%
36%
2%
5%
38%
40%
4%
17%
37%
45%
Fresno 07-08 82%
12%
30%
47%
Fresno 08-09 84%
Not-at-All Prepared
38%
51%
Fresno 09-10 81%
Fresno 04-05 74%
Somewhat Prepared
3%
15%
4%
16%
4%
16%
5%
System 04-05 81%
45%
36%
16%
3%
System 03-04 81%
45%
36%
15%
4%
47%
System 02-03 83%
System 99-02 76%
0%
36%
36%
14%
40%
25%
50%
19%
75%
3%
5%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 19
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite B-2: First-Year Multiple-Subject Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation for Mathematics Instruction (K-8)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
104
62
273
214
42%
47%
49%
54%
35%
27%
41%
34%
10%
15%
14%
20%
3%
1%
6%
3%
81%
78%
86%
84%
Fresno 08-09
102
379
44%
49%
35%
40%
11%
15%
2%
4%
82%
86%
Fresno 07-08
145
589
43%
47%
35%
39%
13%
16%
3%
5%
80%
84%
Fresno 06-07
128
516
39%
44%
34%
38%
18%
22%
2%
3%
76%
80%
Fresno 05-06
77
322
39%
45%
36%
42%
13%
17%
3%
5%
78%
83%
Fresno 04-05
186
728
32%
36%
38%
42%
19%
22%
4%
6%
73%
76%
Fresno 03-04
115
472
42%
47%
35%
40%
11%
15%
3%
5%
80%
84%
Fresno 02-03
113
196
37%
43%
34%
41%
16%
21%
3%
5%
74%
80%
Fresno 99-02
250
353
35%
40%
35%
39%
21%
25%
2%
3%
72%
76%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
927
834
2,319
2,665
47%
47%
49%
49%
34%
34%
36%
36%
12%
13%
14%
15%
4%
3%
4%
4%
82%
82%
84%
83%
System 08-09
991
3,549
45%
47%
37%
39%
13%
14%
2%
3%
83%
84%
System 07-08
1,940
7,133
45%
46%
35%
36%
14%
15%
4%
4%
81%
82%
System 06-07
2,527
9,693
44%
45%
35%
36%
15%
16%
4%
4%
80%
81%
System 05-06
1,331
5,008
43%
44%
35%
37%
15%
17%
4%
5%
79%
80%
System 04-05
2,529
9,899
45%
46%
35%
36%
15%
16%
3%
4%
81%
81%
System 03-04
2,575
10,141
44%
45%
35%
36%
15%
16%
4%
5%
80%
81%
System 02-03
2,017
3,400
46%
47%
35%
36%
14%
15%
3%
4%
82%
83%
System 99-02
5,188
6,892
36%
37%
40%
41%
18%
19%
5%
5%
76%
77%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 20
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite B-3: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of Single-Subject Teachers of English (7-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 73%
Fresno 09-10 83%
Fresno 08-09 67%
Adequately Prepared
18%
48%
44%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
System 09-10 88%
0%
42%
54%
1% 0%
37%
9%
85%
39%
0%
13%
78%
6%
57%
43%
4%
48%
50%
52%
8%
0%
0%
0%
41%
9%
1%
36%
12%
0%
8%
1%
7%
1%
8%
1%
1%
56%
35%
61%
31%
48%
0%
4%
16%
38%
System 07-08 92%
0%
15%
44%
System 08-09 91%
System 06-07 85%
0%
32%
57%
Fresno 03-04 94%
System 10-11 91%
0%
17%
23%
Fresno 05-06 100%
Fresno 99-02 91%
27%
35%
Fresno 06-07 91%
Fresno 02-03 95%
Not-at-All Prepared
55%
Fresno 07-08 99%
Fresno 04-05 83%
Somewhat Prepared
37%
13%
System 05-06 92%
58%
System 04-05 93%
57%
36%
7%
0%
System 03-04 92%
58%
34%
8%
0%
System 02-03 90%
52%
38%
58%
System 99-02 92%
0%
34%
25%
9%
34%
50%
75%
1%
7%
0%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 21
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite B-3: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of Single-Subject Teachers of English (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
15
14
118
180
14%
30%
22%
39%
49%
43%
60%
53%
22%
14%
31%
21%
0%
0%
1%
0%
68%
79%
78%
86%
Fresno 08-09
11
119
39%
50%
18%
28%
27%
37%
0%
1%
62%
73%
Fresno 07-08
11
127
52%
63%
37%
47%
0%
2%
0%
0%
98%
100%
Fresno 06-07
12
138
49%
60%
32%
42%
6%
12%
0%
0%
88%
94%
Fresno 05-06
7
70
80%
90%
10%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
Fresno 04-05
12
151
39%
49%
34%
44%
9%
16%
2%
6%
80%
87%
Fresno 03-04
15
148
74%
83%
12%
20%
3%
8%
0%
0%
92%
97%
Fresno 02-03
6
83
32%
45%
51%
64%
1%
7%
0%
0%
93%
99%
Fresno 99-02
22
167
39%
48%
44%
53%
6%
11%
0%
0%
89%
94%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
114
79
775
845
48%
50%
52%
54%
39%
34%
43%
38%
8%
10%
10%
13%
0%
0%
1%
0%
89%
87%
92%
89%
System 08-09
133
1,529
54%
57%
34%
37%
7%
9%
1%
1%
90%
92%
System 07-08
210
2,387
59%
62%
30%
32%
7%
8%
1%
2%
91%
92%
System 06-07
216
2,559
47%
50%
36%
38%
13%
14%
1%
2%
84%
86%
System 05-06
144
1,610
56%
59%
32%
35%
7%
8%
1%
1%
91%
92%
System 04-05
205
2,363
55%
58%
34%
37%
7%
8%
0%
1%
91%
93%
System 03-04
287
2,562
57%
59%
32%
35%
8%
9%
0%
0%
91%
92%
System 02-03
144
1,775
50%
53%
37%
39%
8%
10%
0%
1%
89%
91%
System 99-02
543
2,628
57%
59%
33%
36%
7%
8%
0%
0%
92%
93%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 22
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite B-3: Single-Subject Teachers of English Assess
Their CSU Preparation for English Instruction (7-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 36%
Fresno 09-10 72%
Fresno 08-09 66%
7%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 05-06 81%
27%
18%
36%
24%
41%
11%
36%
47%
16%
36%
63%
36%
12%
30%
36%
System 08-09 78%
39%
System 07-08 75%
40%
34%
39%
33%
38%
42%
System 03-04 78%
44%
System 02-03 77%
43%
System 99-02 79%
43%
25%
6%
34%
36%
5%
6%
17%
34%
50%
19%
18%
37%
1%
5%
14%
37%
4%
21%
20%
48%
System 06-07 81%
4%
5%
17%
35%
7%
6%
23%
39%
41%
3%
17%
40%
45%
System 10-11 75%
6%
38%
24%
36%
4%
28%
41%
Fresno 99-02 72%
0%
24%
39%
Fresno 02-03 93%
System 04-05 79%
21%
48%
Fresno 03-04 83%
System 05-06 75%
Not-at-All Prepared
43%
24%
Fresno 04-05 81%
System 09-10 75%
Somewhat Prepared
29%
Fresno 07-08 79%
Fresno 06-07 60%
Adequately Prepared
5%
6%
5%
16%
6%
18%
5%
17%
75%
4%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 23
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite B-3: Single-Subject Teachers of English Assess
Their CSU Preparation for English Instruction (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
12
13
158
245
4%
20%
10%
27%
24%
43%
33%
52%
38%
21%
49%
28%
17%
3%
26%
6%
30%
67%
40%
75%
Fresno 08-09
12
226
23%
31%
35%
44%
24%
32%
4%
8%
62%
71%
Fresno 07-08
13
288
37%
45%
34%
42%
15%
21%
1%
4%
76%
83%
Fresno 06-07
13
274
20%
27%
32%
40%
21%
28%
13%
20%
55%
63%
Fresno 05-06
10
234
37%
46%
36%
45%
8%
14%
5%
10%
78%
85%
Fresno 04-05
17
378
41%
48%
32%
39%
13%
18%
2%
5%
78%
83%
Fresno 03-04
9
223
42%
52%
32%
41%
9%
15%
2%
6%
80%
87%
Fresno 02-03
8
207
58%
68%
26%
34%
4%
9%
0%
2%
91%
96%
Fresno 99-02
25
266
32%
40%
32%
40%
19%
26%
3%
7%
68%
76%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
180
156
2,057
2,492
34%
40%
37%
43%
37%
33%
40%
35%
19%
18%
22%
20%
4%
5%
6%
6%
73%
74%
76%
77%
System 08-09
162
3,367
38%
40%
38%
40%
16%
18%
4%
5%
77%
79%
System 07-08
270
5,761
39%
41%
34%
35%
20%
21%
5%
6%
73%
75%
System 06-07
270
5,512
47%
49%
32%
34%
14%
15%
5%
6%
80%
81%
System 05-06
233
5,113
37%
39%
36%
38%
18%
19%
6%
7%
75%
76%
System 04-05
274
6,336
41%
42%
36%
38%
16%
17%
4%
5%
78%
79%
System 03-04
321
7,512
43%
45%
33%
35%
15%
16%
6%
6%
78%
79%
System 02-03
217
4,822
42%
44%
33%
35%
17%
19%
5%
6%
76%
78%
System 99-02
724
5,386
42%
44%
35%
37%
16%
17%
4%
5%
78%
80%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 24
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite B-4: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of Single-Subject Teachers of Mathematics (7-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 71%
Adequately Prepared
25%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
27%
46%
13%
System 09-10 88%
System 08-09 85%
System 07-08 87%
31%
33%
37%
32%
3% 0%
39%
18%
71%
36%
30%
53%
System 05-06 84%
52%
32%
59%
0%
12%
61%
25%
36%
75%
2%
4%
9%
8%
28%
50%
1%
12%
33%
53%
2%
11%
30%
54%
2%
13%
33%
35%
0%
3%
11%
32%
54%
System 02-03 89%
6%
16%
58%
System 04-05 89%
11%
23%
45%
0%
0%
60%
51%
System 99-02 89%
10%
15%
System 06-07 86%
System 03-04 87%
1%
64%
Fresno 99-02 94%
System 10-11 81%
28%
0%
0%
26%
57%
22%
0%
22%
27%
28%
Fresno 05-06 90%
Fresno 02-03 71%
6%
8%
50%
Fresno 07-08 73%
Fresno 03-04 97%
22%
92%
Fresno 08-09 77%
Fresno 04-05 86%
Not-at-All Prepared
46%
Fresno 09-10 100%
Fresno 06-07 41%
Somewhat Prepared
2%
5%
10%
1%
10%
1%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 25
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite B-4: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of Single-Subject Teachers of Mathematics (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
16
11
115
89
21%
89%
30%
95%
41%
5%
51%
11%
18%
0%
27%
0%
4%
0%
9%
0%
67%
100%
76%
100%
Fresno 08-09
13
114
45%
56%
23%
32%
18%
27%
0%
0%
73%
82%
Fresno 07-08
10
88
40%
52%
22%
32%
20%
31%
0%
2%
68%
79%
Fresno 06-07
5
38
20%
37%
7%
19%
20%
37%
22%
39%
32%
50%
Fresno 05-06
3
28
46%
68%
23%
43%
4%
17%
0%
0%
83%
96%
Fresno 04-05
3
25
13%
31%
53%
74%
7%
22%
0%
0%
78%
93%
Fresno 03-04
5
37
28%
47%
50%
70%
0%
6%
0%
0%
94%
100%
Fresno 02-03
3
26
22%
42%
29%
50%
9%
26%
4%
18%
61%
81%
Fresno 99-02
9
55
64%
77%
17%
29%
3%
10%
0%
0%
90%
97%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
131
90
735
639
43%
56%
47%
60%
34%
28%
38%
32%
14%
9%
17%
12%
3%
1%
4%
2%
79%
86%
83%
89%
System 08-09
124
970
51%
55%
30%
33%
12%
15%
2%
3%
83%
86%
System 07-08
161
1,339
53%
56%
32%
35%
10%
12%
1%
2%
86%
88%
System 06-07
145
1,144
49%
52%
33%
37%
11%
13%
2%
3%
84%
87%
System 05-06
87
757
50%
54%
30%
34%
11%
13%
3%
5%
83%
86%
System 04-05
107
848
58%
61%
29%
32%
8%
10%
1%
2%
89%
91%
System 03-04
141
694
52%
57%
31%
35%
7%
9%
4%
6%
86%
89%
System 02-03
91
808
59%
63%
26%
30%
9%
11%
1%
2%
88%
90%
System 99-02
242
993
51%
54%
35%
38%
9%
11%
1%
1%
88%
90%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 26
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite B-4: Single-Subject Teachers of Mathematics
Assess Their CSU Preparation for Mathematics Instruction (7-12)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
45%
Fresno 10-11 84%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 05-06 68%
Fresno 04-05 73%
31%
10%
8%
20%
41%
38%
11%
36%
53%
3%
31%
44%
System 08-09 84%
6%
20%
55%
54%
5%
31%
77%
System 09-10 81%
6%
22%
63%
Fresno 99-02 86%
2%
26%
35%
Fresno 02-03 97%
6%
27%
47%
27%
3%
13%
27%
Fresno 03-04 94%
System 10-11 80%
16%
34%
39%
Fresno 07-08 66%
13%
34%
46%
Fresno 08-09 80%
Not-at-All Prepared
39%
39%
Fresno 09-10 73%
Fresno 06-07 78%
Somewhat Prepared
16%
27%
13%
31%
4%
6%
11%
4%
48%
33%
15%
4%
System 06-07 81%
48%
33%
15%
4%
System 04-05 78%
System 03-04 83%
System 02-03 86%
System 99-02 83%
0%
44%
35%
45%
33%
48%
35%
55%
50%
25%
16%
6%
17%
5%
14%
31%
10%
33%
50%
13%
75%
0%
3%
System 07-08 81%
System 05-06 79%
0%
3%
4%
4%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 27
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite B-4: Single-Subject Teachers of Mathematics
Assess Their CSU Preparation for Mathematics Instruction (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
19
10
203
142
40%
34%
49%
45%
35%
29%
44%
39%
10%
12%
16%
20%
1%
7%
5%
14%
81%
69%
87%
78%
Fresno 08-09
12
177
42%
51%
29%
39%
10%
16%
4%
9%
77%
84%
Fresno 07-08
12
242
35%
43%
23%
31%
23%
31%
5%
10%
62%
70%
Fresno 06-07
5
84
24%
37%
40%
54%
14%
26%
0%
4%
72%
84%
Fresno 05-06
6
89
20%
33%
34%
48%
19%
32%
3%
10%
61%
75%
Fresno 04-05
10
183
30%
39%
34%
43%
18%
26%
3%
8%
69%
77%
Fresno 03-04
3
58
55%
72%
23%
39%
2%
10%
0%
0%
90%
98%
Fresno 02-03
4
62
71%
84%
13%
26%
0%
6%
0%
0%
94%
100%
Fresno 99-02
20
77
49%
62%
25%
37%
7%
15%
1%
5%
82%
91%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
194
137
1,900
1,731
42%
53%
45%
56%
35%
26%
38%
29%
15%
12%
17%
14%
3%
5%
5%
7%
79%
80%
81%
82%
System 08-09
182
2,765
52%
55%
30%
33%
11%
12%
3%
4%
84%
86%
System 07-08
179
2,949
47%
50%
32%
34%
14%
15%
3%
4%
80%
82%
System 06-07
192
2,886
47%
50%
32%
34%
14%
16%
3%
4%
80%
82%
System 05-06
142
2,029
42%
45%
33%
36%
15%
17%
5%
6%
77%
80%
System 04-05
176
3,045
44%
47%
32%
34%
16%
18%
4%
5%
78%
80%
System 03-04
170
2,897
47%
49%
34%
36%
13%
15%
3%
4%
82%
83%
System 02-03
110
1,814
53%
56%
29%
32%
9%
11%
4%
5%
84%
87%
System 99-02
416
2,227
49%
51%
32%
34%
12%
14%
3%
4%
82%
84%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 28
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite B-5: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of Single-Subject Teachers of Science (7-12)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
52%
Fresno 10-11 87%
62%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
20%
24%
38%
Fresno 06-07 77%
0%
0%
44%
54%
Fresno 07-08 78%
14%
18%
50%
Fresno 08-09 94%
Not-at-All Prepared
35%
Fresno 09-10 80%
Fresno 05-06 0%
Somewhat Prepared
6%
11%
39%
0%
11%
23%
0%
CTQ did not receive sufficient responses from this group in this period to deliver a reliable report.
57%
Fresno 04-05 90%
Fresno 03-04 80%
Fresno 02-03 82%
Fresno 99-02 98%
40%
40%
38%
0%
48%
0%
32%
59%
30%
45%
40%
53%
31%
57%
49%
0%
10%
1%
2%
9%
3%
10%
3%
33%
34%
2%
11%
14%
35%
57%
System 05-06 90%
System 04-05 83%
19%
56%
System 06-07 88%
0%
2%
19%
50%
System 09-10 89%
System 07-08 88%
10%
44%
System 10-11 88%
System 08-09 85%
33%
7%
14%
2%
4%
System 03-04 91%
54%
37%
8%
0%
System 02-03 92%
54%
38%
7%
1%
35%
8%
1%
System 99-02 91%
0%
56%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 29
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite B-5: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of Single-Subject Teachers of Science (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
9
4
82
47
45%
54%
58%
71%
29%
12%
41%
25%
9%
13%
18%
27%
0%
0%
0%
0%
82%
73%
91%
87%
Fresno 08-09
6
80
43%
57%
37%
50%
3%
10%
0%
0%
90%
97%
Fresno 07-08
7
89
48%
61%
18%
29%
7%
15%
7%
15%
73%
83%
Fresno 06-07
4
44
29%
47%
31%
48%
15%
30%
0%
0%
70%
85%
Fresno 05-06
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
Fresno 04-05
7
74
50%
64%
26%
40%
6%
14%
0%
0%
86%
94%
Fresno 03-04
8
39
32%
47%
32%
47%
13%
25%
0%
4%
73%
86%
Fresno 02-03
5
24
28%
47%
34%
54%
11%
27%
0%
0%
73%
89%
Fresno 99-02
9
29
41%
59%
39%
56%
0%
0%
0%
5%
95%
100%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
81
45
605
394
54%
57%
59%
62%
30%
27%
34%
33%
10%
8%
13%
12%
0%
0%
1%
1%
87%
88%
90%
91%
System 08-09
82
894
43%
47%
38%
42%
12%
15%
1%
2%
83%
86%
System 07-08
96
1,024
51%
55%
33%
36%
8%
10%
3%
4%
86%
89%
System 06-07
106
1,157
55%
59%
29%
32%
9%
11%
2%
3%
86%
89%
System 05-06
59
602
55%
60%
31%
35%
6%
9%
1%
3%
89%
92%
System 04-05
91
970
47%
51%
32%
36%
12%
15%
3%
5%
81%
84%
System 03-04
165
593
52%
56%
35%
39%
7%
9%
0%
0%
90%
93%
System 02-03
92
506
52%
56%
36%
40%
6%
8%
0%
1%
91%
93%
System 99-02
300
877
54%
57%
34%
37%
7%
8%
1%
2%
90%
92%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 30
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite B-5: Single-Subject Teachers of Science Assess
Their CSU Preparation for Science Instruction (7-12)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
41%
Fresno 10-11 85%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
33%
45%
System 06-07 81%
44%
System 02-03 79%
System 99-02 81%
0%
18%
36%
20%
33%
14%
33%
34%
47%
31%
44%
35%
47%
25%
13%
31%
48%
System 04-05 78%
14%
35%
45%
1%
3%
4%
4%
4%
5%
20%
4%
17%
5%
17%
5%
17%
34%
50%
3%
11%
37%
47%
43%
System 03-04 78%
9%
43%
43%
System 05-06 76%
2% 0%
4%
17%
55%
System 10-11 82%
5%
27%
39%
46%
2%
10%
71%
Fresno 99-02 89%
System 07-08 76%
20%
38%
41%
3%
3%
40%
47%
Fresno 03-04 80%
System 08-09 83%
32%
37%
0%
4%
12%
47%
Fresno 04-05 98%
System 09-10 78%
15%
33%
19%
Fresno 05-06 85%
Fresno 02-03 88%
14%
33%
52%
Fresno 08-09 85%
Fresno 06-07 77%
Not-at-All Prepared
44%
48%
Fresno 09-10 81%
Fresno 07-08 66%
Somewhat Prepared
15%
75%
4%
4%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 31
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite B-5: Single-Subject Teachers of Science Assess
Their CSU Preparation for Science Instruction (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
18
11
149
237
36%
44%
47%
53%
39%
28%
50%
37%
10%
12%
18%
19%
0%
2%
1%
6%
81%
77%
89%
84%
Fresno 08-09
8
206
48%
57%
28%
37%
9%
15%
1%
4%
82%
89%
Fresno 07-08
7
127
14%
23%
41%
53%
26%
37%
1%
5%
60%
71%
Fresno 06-07
7
158
32%
43%
35%
45%
16%
25%
1%
4%
73%
82%
Fresno 05-06
3
66
38%
56%
29%
46%
5%
16%
1%
8%
79%
91%
Fresno 04-05
8
142
66%
76%
22%
32%
1%
4%
0%
0%
96%
99%
Fresno 03-04
7
83
34%
47%
32%
45%
12%
22%
1%
7%
74%
85%
Fresno 02-03
6
60
25%
40%
48%
62%
5%
13%
1%
6%
83%
92%
Fresno 99-02
18
87
40%
51%
37%
49%
7%
15%
0%
1%
85%
92%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
129
100
1,018
1,038
44%
41%
47%
45%
35%
33%
39%
37%
13%
16%
15%
19%
3%
3%
4%
5%
81%
77%
84%
80%
System 08-09
101
2,061
45%
48%
34%
37%
12%
14%
4%
5%
81%
83%
System 07-08
141
2,635
44%
47%
29%
32%
19%
21%
4%
5%
75%
77%
System 06-07
134
2,711
47%
49%
32%
34%
13%
15%
5%
6%
80%
82%
System 05-06
115
2,101
41%
44%
32%
35%
19%
21%
4%
5%
75%
77%
System 04-05
151
2,867
43%
45%
33%
35%
16%
18%
5%
6%
77%
79%
System 03-04
217
2,501
46%
48%
30%
32%
16%
18%
4%
6%
77%
79%
System 02-03
171
1,676
42%
45%
34%
37%
16%
18%
4%
5%
78%
80%
System 99-02
474
2,136
45%
48%
33%
35%
14%
16%
3%
4%
80%
82%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 32
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite B-6: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of Single-Subject Teachers of History (7-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 53%
Adequately Prepared
25%
48%
28%
72%
20%
86%
0%
9%
0%
30%
44%
0%
4%
0%
2% 0%
18%
42%
0%
14%
System 10-11 88%
53%
35%
System 09-10 87%
53%
34%
52%
0%
11%
9%
59%
7%
36%
61%
5%
31%
52%
0%
3%
41%
System 06-07 92%
0%
27%
53%
System 07-08 95%
8%
34%
72%
Fresno 02-03 83%
1%
14%
61%
Fresno 03-04 99%
0%
12%
64%
Fresno 04-05 95%
System 05-06 91%
9%
39%
Fresno 05-06 100%
System 08-09 93%
0%
39%
Fresno 06-07 92%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
47%
52%
Fresno 07-08 92%
Fresno 99-02 86%
Not-at-All Prepared
28%
Fresno 09-10 91%
Fresno 08-09 87%
Somewhat Prepared
8%
39%
6%
0%
0%
0%
4%
System 04-05 87%
55%
32%
11%
2%
System 03-04 89%
54%
35%
9%
2%
System 02-03 85%
54%
System 99-02 88%
0%
31%
50%
25%
12%
38%
50%
11%
75%
3%
1%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 33
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite B-6: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of Single-Subject Teachers of History (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
8
8
27
71
16%
45%
34%
59%
19%
33%
37%
46%
37%
5%
57%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
43%
87%
63%
95%
Fresno 08-09
11
101
42%
54%
34%
45%
8%
16%
0%
2%
83%
91%
Fresno 07-08
14
141
60%
69%
24%
32%
5%
10%
0%
0%
90%
95%
Fresno 06-07
13
107
66%
77%
15%
24%
5%
12%
0%
0%
88%
95%
Fresno 05-06
4
20
78%
95%
5%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
Fresno 04-05
15
141
56%
66%
30%
39%
2%
7%
0%
0%
93%
98%
Fresno 03-04
10
48
65%
78%
20%
33%
0%
3%
0%
0%
97%
100%
Fresno 02-03
5
30
43%
62%
22%
38%
11%
24%
0%
0%
76%
89%
Fresno 99-02
12
50
38%
51%
35%
48%
9%
19%
0%
0%
81%
91%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
65
45
352
344
50%
50%
56%
57%
33%
31%
38%
37%
10%
8%
13%
11%
0%
2%
1%
4%
86%
86%
90%
90%
System 08-09
68
643
50%
55%
38%
43%
6%
8%
0%
0%
92%
94%
System 07-08
143
1,325
57%
60%
35%
38%
4%
5%
0%
1%
94%
96%
System 06-07
137
1,366
60%
63%
29%
32%
7%
8%
0%
1%
91%
93%
System 05-06
87
751
49%
54%
37%
41%
5%
7%
3%
5%
89%
92%
System 04-05
148
1,353
53%
57%
31%
34%
10%
12%
1%
2%
86%
88%
System 03-04
213
756
52%
56%
33%
37%
8%
10%
2%
3%
88%
90%
System 02-03
116
616
52%
56%
29%
33%
11%
13%
2%
4%
84%
86%
System 99-02
362
1,238
49%
51%
37%
40%
10%
12%
1%
1%
87%
89%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 34
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite B-6: Single-Subject Teachers of History Assess
Their CSU Preparation for History Instruction (7-12)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
27%
Fresno 10-11 68%
35%
Fresno 07-08 71%
34%
50%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
36%
Fresno 03-04 64%
35%
System 10-11 75%
System 09-10 81%
System 06-07 81%
System 05-06 77%
8%
28%
4%
19%
11%
25%
9%
55%
43%
14%
32%
17%
47%
34%
53%
14%
14%
35%
48%
17%
33%
43%
15%
34%
45%
System 02-03 81%
44%
13%
37%
16%
33%
50%
5%
3%
3%
3%
6%
17%
37%
49%
25%
17%
35%
0%
8%
30%
44%
System 03-04 82%
2%
38%
32%
45%
0%
3%
23%
32%
System 04-05 80%
System 99-02 82%
18%
29%
System 08-09 83%
System 07-08 79%
3%
26%
43%
21%
0%
23%
56%
Fresno 04-05 79%
11%
37%
12%
5%
34%
39%
Fresno 06-07 68%
Fresno 99-02 87%
28%
55%
Fresno 08-09 74%
Fresno 02-03 53%
Not-at-All Prepared
41%
Fresno 09-10 89%
Fresno 05-06 68%
Somewhat Prepared
14%
75%
4%
5%
3%
3%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 35
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite B-6: Single-Subject Teachers of History Assess
Their CSU Preparation for History Instruction (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
18
12
239
200
23%
50%
30%
60%
37%
29%
45%
38%
24%
8%
31%
14%
3%
0%
7%
1%
63%
86%
72%
92%
Fresno 08-09
13
265
31%
39%
35%
43%
19%
26%
2%
5%
70%
78%
Fresno 07-08
23
380
31%
37%
34%
41%
23%
29%
2%
4%
68%
74%
Fresno 06-07
8
169
45%
56%
14%
23%
18%
27%
5%
11%
64%
74%
Fresno 05-06
7
99
7%
16%
49%
63%
22%
34%
1%
6%
62%
75%
Fresno 04-05
17
343
32%
39%
40%
47%
16%
22%
1%
3%
76%
82%
Fresno 03-04
7
84
29%
41%
23%
35%
7%
15%
20%
31%
57%
70%
Fresno 02-03
9
88
16%
26%
26%
38%
32%
44%
5%
12%
47%
60%
Fresno 99-02
15
61
25%
38%
47%
62%
9%
19%
0%
0%
81%
91%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
128
99
1,279
1,504
41%
46%
45%
49%
31%
32%
34%
35%
16%
13%
18%
15%
7%
4%
9%
6%
74%
79%
77%
82%
System 08-09
112
2,037
51%
54%
28%
31%
13%
15%
3%
4%
82%
84%
System 07-08
194
3,678
43%
46%
34%
37%
16%
18%
3%
4%
79%
81%
System 06-07
200
3,861
47%
50%
32%
34%
14%
16%
3%
4%
81%
83%
System 05-06
136
2,465
42%
45%
32%
35%
16%
18%
5%
7%
76%
78%
System 04-05
198
3,771
44%
46%
34%
36%
16%
17%
4%
4%
79%
80%
System 03-04
234
2,515
43%
46%
36%
38%
12%
14%
5%
6%
81%
83%
System 02-03
194
1,834
43%
45%
36%
38%
15%
17%
3%
4%
80%
82%
System 99-02
528
2,208
48%
51%
32%
35%
14%
15%
2%
3%
82%
84%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 36
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite B-7: K-8 Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation
to Teach Subjects Other than Reading and Mathematics (K-8)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
47%
Fresno 10-11 78%
Fresno 09-10 76%
25%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 99-02 78%
34%
23%
System 08-09 77%
41%
System 07-08 80%
41%
40%
42%
43%
System 04-05 77%
36%
41%
System 03-04 76%
35%
System 02-03 76%
System 99-02 79%
0%
19%
39%
35%
43%
37%
42%
25%
50%
2%
3%
18%
2%
18%
2%
20%
41%
33%
1%
17%
36%
System 05-06 78%
2%
15%
39%
38%
4%
19%
43%
42%
1%
4%
19%
44%
System 09-10 81%
3%
19%
43%
System 10-11 83%
System 06-07 80%
40%
45%
35%
2%
22%
39%
28%
2%
27%
53%
Fresno 02-03 78%
5%
24%
39%
22%
3%
23%
39%
33%
6%
22%
39%
35%
Fresno 04-05 79%
Fresno 03-04 73%
16%
51%
Fresno 07-08 74%
Fresno 06-07 72%
Not-at-All Prepared
31%
32%
Fresno 08-09 71%
Fresno 05-06 75%
Somewhat Prepared
2%
20%
3%
21%
3%
21%
3%
19%
75%
2%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 37
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite B-7: K-8 Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation
to Teach Subjects Other than Reading and Mathematics (K-8)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
48
36
147
110
44%
21%
50%
28%
28%
47%
34%
55%
13%
19%
18%
25%
4%
1%
8%
4%
75%
72%
81%
79%
Fresno 08-09
34
115
29%
36%
35%
43%
20%
27%
4%
7%
68%
75%
Fresno 07-08
124
469
33%
37%
37%
41%
23%
26%
1%
2%
72%
75%
Fresno 06-07
76
312
31%
35%
37%
41%
25%
29%
1%
2%
70%
74%
Fresno 05-06
32
127
19%
25%
49%
56%
19%
25%
2%
4%
72%
78%
Fresno 04-05
96
346
37%
41%
38%
42%
17%
21%
1%
2%
78%
81%
Fresno 03-04
147
408
27%
30%
43%
47%
21%
25%
3%
5%
71%
75%
Fresno 02-03
65
249
32%
37%
40%
46%
17%
21%
3%
5%
75%
80%
Fresno 99-02
178
501
32%
36%
42%
46%
18%
21%
2%
3%
77%
80%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
362
258
941
849
42%
41%
45%
44%
39%
38%
41%
40%
14%
16%
16%
18%
1%
2%
2%
3%
82%
80%
84%
82%
System 08-09
388
1,339
40%
43%
35%
38%
18%
20%
3%
3%
77%
79%
System 07-08
1,036
3,763
41%
42%
38%
40%
17%
18%
2%
2%
80%
81%
System 06-07
1,426
5,374
37%
38%
41%
42%
18%
19%
2%
3%
79%
80%
System 05-06
676
2,438
34%
36%
42%
44%
20%
21%
2%
2%
77%
78%
System 04-05
1,200
4,410
35%
36%
40%
42%
20%
21%
3%
3%
76%
77%
System 03-04
1,974
5,234
35%
36%
41%
42%
20%
21%
3%
3%
76%
77%
System 02-03
1,255
4,878
32%
34%
42%
44%
20%
21%
3%
4%
76%
77%
System 99-02
3,365
8,205
36%
37%
41%
42%
19%
19%
2%
3%
78%
79%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 38
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite B-7: Multiple-Subject Teachers Assess Their CSU
Preparation to Teach Subjects Other than Reading and Mathematics (K-8)
Well Prepared
Fresno 08-09 64%
29%
Fresno 07-08 67%
28%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 04-05 57%
Fresno 03-04 57%
Not-at-All Prepared
36%
28%
Fresno 09-10 65%
Fresno 05-06 50%
Somewhat Prepared
30%
Fresno 10-11 66%
Fresno 06-07 60%
Adequately Prepared
26%
37%
27%
9%
35%
28%
8%
39%
24%
25%
36%
18%
8%
37%
37%
23%
7%
33%
32%
20%
8%
13%
31%
34%
12%
27%
16%
Fresno 02-03 60%
25%
35%
30%
10%
Fresno 99-02 60%
25%
35%
30%
10%
System 10-11 68%
34%
34%
24%
8%
System 09-10 69%
33%
36%
23%
8%
System 08-09 68%
31%
37%
25%
7%
System 07-08 69%
30%
39%
24%
7%
System 06-07 62%
26%
System 05-06 60%
27%
System 04-05 64%
System 03-04 62%
System 02-03 65%
System 99-02 65%
0%
36%
28%
33%
29%
29%
35%
28%
30%
26%
35%
28%
37%
25%
11%
26%
34%
50%
9%
9%
12%
26%
9%
26%
9%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 39
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite B-7: Multiple-Subject Teachers Assess Their CSU
Preparation to Teach Subjects Other than Reading and Mathematics (K-8)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
90
53
517
363
28%
25%
32%
30%
34%
34%
38%
39%
24%
24%
28%
29%
7%
7%
9%
10%
64%
62%
68%
67%
Fresno 08-09
89
660
28%
31%
33%
37%
26%
30%
7%
9%
62%
66%
Fresno 07-08
135
1,043
27%
30%
38%
41%
24%
26%
7%
8%
66%
69%
Fresno 06-07
123
917
23%
26%
34%
37%
31%
34%
7%
9%
58%
61%
Fresno 05-06
72
564
17%
20%
30%
34%
35%
39%
12%
15%
48%
52%
Fresno 04-05
168
1,249
19%
21%
36%
39%
30%
32%
11%
13%
56%
59%
Fresno 03-04
105
827
21%
24%
33%
36%
26%
29%
14%
17%
55%
59%
Fresno 02-03
105
806
23%
26%
34%
37%
28%
31%
9%
11%
59%
62%
Fresno 99-02
239
1,088
24%
27%
33%
36%
29%
32%
9%
11%
58%
61%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
748
676
4,171
4,592
33%
32%
34%
33%
33%
36%
35%
37%
24%
22%
25%
24%
8%
8%
8%
8%
67%
68%
68%
70%
System 08-09
831
6,028
30%
31%
37%
38%
24%
25%
7%
8%
67%
69%
System 07-08
1,611
12,272
30%
31%
38%
39%
24%
25%
7%
7%
68%
69%
System 06-07
2,185
16,690
26%
27%
36%
37%
28%
29%
9%
9%
62%
63%
System 05-06
1,087
8,461
26%
27%
33%
34%
28%
29%
11%
11%
60%
61%
System 04-05
2,189
17,016
29%
30%
34%
35%
26%
27%
9%
10%
64%
64%
System 03-04
2,214
17,269
28%
28%
33%
34%
26%
26%
12%
12%
61%
62%
System 02-03
1,707
13,593
30%
30%
35%
35%
25%
26%
9%
10%
65%
65%
System 99-02
4,744
22,435
27%
28%
37%
37%
26%
27%
9%
10%
64%
65%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 40
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite B-8: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation to Teach Subjects Other than Four Core Subjects (7-12)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
49%
Fresno 10-11 84%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
11%
53%
35%
34%
55%
48%
40%
55%
3%
10%
34%
33%
11%
0%
12%
0%
11%
0%
8%
39%
1%
4%
28%
51%
0%
11%
67%
Fresno 02-03 95%
Fresno 99-02 90%
8%
37%
54%
Fresno 06-07 88%
Fresno 03-04 88%
27%
53%
Fresno 07-08 88%
Fresno 04-05 88%
8%
60%
Fresno 08-09 90%
Not-at-All Prepared
35%
Fresno 09-10 87%
Fresno 05-06 89%
Somewhat Prepared
5%
0%
8%
2%
System 10-11 90%
57%
33%
8%
2%
System 09-10 90%
56%
34%
8%
2%
System 08-09 91%
57%
34%
System 07-08 89%
58%
31%
8%
9%
1%
2%
System 06-07 91%
61%
30%
8%
1%
System 05-06 92%
61%
31%
7%
1%
System 04-05 87%
55%
System 03-04 89%
56%
0%
33%
59%
System 02-03 90%
System 99-02 90%
32%
31%
54%
25%
36%
50%
75%
11%
2%
9%
2%
9%
1%
9%
1%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 41
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite B-8: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation to Teach Subjects Other than Four Core Subjects (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
19
32
93
153
44%
56%
54%
63%
30%
23%
40%
30%
5%
8%
11%
13%
5%
2%
11%
4%
80%
83%
88%
89%
Fresno 08-09
18
95
48%
58%
32%
42%
7%
13%
0%
0%
87%
93%
Fresno 07-08
37
196
51%
58%
31%
38%
9%
13%
0%
1%
87%
91%
Fresno 06-07
19
104
48%
58%
31%
40%
8%
15%
0%
0%
85%
92%
Fresno 05-06
11
56
28%
41%
49%
62%
6%
15%
0%
0%
85%
94%
Fresno 04-05
19
113
44%
53%
35%
44%
8%
14%
0%
2%
85%
91%
Fresno 03-04
35
149
51%
59%
29%
37%
6%
10%
2%
5%
86%
91%
Fresno 02-03
18
102
62%
72%
23%
32%
3%
7%
0%
0%
93%
97%
Fresno 99-02
43
153
47%
55%
36%
43%
6%
10%
1%
3%
88%
92%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
127
117
590
550
55%
54%
59%
58%
31%
32%
35%
36%
7%
7%
9%
9%
1%
1%
3%
2%
89%
89%
92%
91%
System 08-09
164
840
55%
58%
33%
36%
7%
9%
1%
2%
90%
92%
System 07-08
264
1,362
57%
60%
29%
32%
8%
10%
1%
2%
88%
90%
System 06-07
253
1,234
60%
62%
28%
31%
7%
9%
1%
2%
90%
91%
System 05-06
168
746
59%
63%
29%
33%
6%
8%
1%
2%
91%
93%
System 04-05
244
1,052
54%
57%
30%
33%
10%
12%
2%
2%
86%
88%
System 03-04
414
1,365
55%
57%
32%
35%
8%
10%
1%
2%
88%
90%
System 02-03
204
1,009
57%
60%
30%
33%
8%
10%
1%
1%
89%
91%
System 99-02
711
2,177
53%
55%
35%
37%
9%
10%
1%
1%
89%
90%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 42
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite B-8: Single-Subject Teachers Assess Their CSU
Preparation to Teach Subjects Other than Four Core Subjects (7-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 80%
Fresno 08-09 86%
48%
Fresno 07-08 82%
47%
Fresno 02-03 77%
38%
8%
10%
29%
46%
13%
11%
41%
45%
System 10-11 82%
49%
21%
50%
System 06-07 84%
51%
9%
33%
30%
55%
4%
3%
40%
52%
System 07-08 83%
6%
9%
32%
50%
3%
14%
55%
1%
14%
41%
System 08-09 88%
3%
13%
35%
39%
2%
17%
38%
Fresno 99-02 90%
System 09-10 82%
17%
33%
37%
Fresno 04-05 84%
Fresno 03-04 87%
Not-at-All Prepared
43%
48%
Fresno 05-06 77%
Somewhat Prepared
37%
Fresno 09-10 81%
Fresno 06-07 78%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
16%
3%
15%
3%
33%
10%
33%
33%
2%
3%
13%
4%
12%
4%
System 05-06 81%
48%
33%
14%
5%
System 04-05 81%
49%
32%
15%
4%
System 03-04 86%
System 02-03 83%
System 99-02 83%
0%
53%
33%
49%
34%
51%
25%
12%
32%
50%
3%
13%
4%
14%
3%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 43
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite B-8: Single-Subject Teachers Assess Their CSU
Preparation to Teach Subjects Other than Four Core Subjects (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
43
22
345
252
34%
44%
40%
51%
40%
29%
47%
37%
15%
14%
20%
20%
1%
1%
3%
4%
78%
77%
83%
84%
Fresno 08-09
20
214
44%
53%
34%
42%
10%
16%
0%
2%
83%
89%
Fresno 07-08
29
313
44%
51%
32%
38%
12%
16%
2%
5%
80%
85%
Fresno 06-07
27
348
33%
40%
37%
44%
12%
17%
6%
10%
74%
80%
Fresno 05-06
14
179
34%
43%
34%
43%
7%
13%
10%
16%
73%
81%
Fresno 04-05
21
218
51%
59%
25%
33%
8%
13%
4%
8%
80%
87%
Fresno 03-04
16
202
42%
50%
37%
45%
7%
12%
2%
6%
84%
90%
Fresno 02-03
20
194
40%
49%
28%
35%
18%
24%
1%
4%
73%
80%
Fresno 99-02
62
286
46%
53%
37%
43%
7%
11%
1%
2%
88%
91%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
219
164
1,793
1,854
47%
50%
50%
53%
31%
29%
34%
32%
15%
14%
17%
16%
3%
3%
4%
4%
80%
81%
82%
83%
System 08-09
193
2,180
54%
56%
31%
34%
9%
10%
2%
3%
87%
89%
System 07-08
284
3,025
49%
51%
32%
34%
13%
14%
3%
4%
82%
84%
System 06-07
297
3,416
50%
52%
32%
34%
12%
13%
4%
4%
83%
84%
System 05-06
246
2,619
47%
50%
32%
34%
13%
14%
4%
5%
81%
83%
System 04-05
355
3,404
48%
50%
31%
33%
14%
16%
3%
4%
81%
82%
System 03-04
378
3,849
52%
53%
32%
34%
11%
12%
2%
3%
85%
87%
System 02-03
326
2,808
48%
50%
33%
35%
12%
13%
4%
5%
82%
84%
System 99-02
1,008
4,269
50%
52%
31%
33%
13%
14%
3%
4%
82%
84%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 44
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite B-9: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation to Develop Reading Skills in Content Classes (7-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 64%
20%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
42%
36%
System 09-10 76%
System 08-09 75%
22%
4%
22%
4%
24%
29%
42%
30%
25%
31%
17%
33%
36%
37%
35%
4%
23%
39%
40%
42%
4%
6%
36%
41%
0%
5%
37%
30%
System 07-08 78%
1%
40%
34%
Fresno 03-04 79%
System 10-11 72%
40%
31%
4%
31%
34%
Fresno 04-05 65%
19%
39%
32%
Fresno 05-06 76%
5%
38%
30%
Fresno 06-07 74%
Fresno 99-02 61%
Not-at-All Prepared
31%
39%
Fresno 07-08 74%
Fresno 02-03 60%
Somewhat Prepared
44%
Fresno 09-10 77%
Fresno 08-09 69%
Adequately Prepared
5%
21%
4%
23%
3%
36%
18%
5%
System 06-07 76%
39%
37%
20%
4%
System 05-06 76%
39%
37%
19%
5%
System 04-05 73%
39%
System 03-04 78%
40%
System 02-03 71%
32%
System 99-02 73%
32%
0%
34%
22%
38%
18%
39%
25%
41%
25%
50%
24%
75%
5%
4%
5%
4%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 45
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite B-9: Secondary School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation to Develop Reading Skills in Content Classes (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
58
68
130
186
15%
34%
25%
44%
38%
33%
51%
43%
25%
15%
37%
23%
2%
2%
7%
6%
58%
73%
70%
82%
Fresno 08-09
59
192
25%
34%
34%
44%
26%
36%
0%
2%
63%
73%
Fresno 07-08
77
182
27%
37%
37%
47%
18%
26%
2%
7%
69%
78%
Fresno 06-07
49
156
29%
40%
34%
46%
17%
26%
2%
6%
69%
80%
Fresno 05-06
27
84
28%
44%
32%
48%
17%
31%
0%
0%
69%
83%
Fresno 04-05
56
193
26%
36%
29%
39%
25%
34%
3%
8%
60%
70%
Fresno 03-04
73
200
37%
47%
32%
42%
13%
21%
2%
7%
75%
83%
Fresno 02-03
38
33
21%
40%
21%
40%
24%
43%
1%
11%
51%
70%
Fresno 99-02
91
73
19%
31%
29%
42%
29%
42%
1%
7%
54%
67%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
438
372
1,003
1,018
29%
34%
33%
39%
39%
36%
44%
41%
21%
19%
25%
23%
4%
3%
6%
5%
70%
73%
74%
77%
System 08-09
554
1,575
33%
36%
38%
42%
21%
24%
2%
3%
73%
76%
System 07-08
839
2,447
40%
43%
34%
37%
17%
19%
4%
5%
76%
79%
System 06-07
824
2,728
37%
40%
36%
38%
19%
21%
4%
5%
75%
77%
System 05-06
512
1,631
38%
41%
35%
39%
17%
20%
4%
6%
75%
78%
System 04-05
727
2,310
37%
40%
32%
35%
21%
23%
5%
6%
71%
74%
System 03-04
1,140
2,588
39%
42%
37%
40%
17%
19%
3%
4%
77%
80%
System 02-03
610
501
29%
34%
36%
41%
23%
27%
4%
6%
68%
72%
System 99-02
2,034
1,101
30%
33%
39%
43%
22%
25%
3%
4%
71%
74%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 46
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite B-9: Single-Subject Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Develop Reading Skills in Content Classes (7-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 59%
Fresno 08-09 68%
30%
Fresno 05-06 57%
Fresno 04-05 60%
System 10-11 72%
30%
11%
25%
38%
26%
38%
25%
29%
39%
22%
26%
32%
36%
7%
23%
25%
25%
9%
33%
37%
8%
36%
2%
46%
26%
34%
6%
11%
34%
34%
5%
9%
24%
35%
Fresno 02-03 61%
Not-at-All Prepared
39%
24%
Fresno 03-04 69%
Fresno 99-02 71%
Somewhat Prepared
44%
30%
Fresno 06-07 64%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
15%
Fresno 09-10 69%
Fresno 07-08 62%
Adequately Prepared
38%
23%
3%
6%
System 09-10 72%
35%
37%
22%
5%
System 08-09 74%
35%
39%
21%
6%
System 07-08 72%
System 06-07 72%
System 05-06 68%
33%
39%
34%
23%
6%
22%
6%
38%
30%
38%
25%
8%
System 04-05 70%
32%
38%
25%
5%
System 03-04 71%
33%
38%
24%
6%
System 02-03 67%
29%
38%
System 99-02 68%
28%
40%
0%
25%
27%
50%
26%
75%
6%
5%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 47
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite B-9: Single-Subject Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Develop Reading Skills in Content Classes (7-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
96
66
216
221
11%
26%
18%
35%
39%
34%
49%
44%
26%
21%
35%
30%
8%
3%
15%
8%
53%
65%
63%
74%
Fresno 08-09
64
229
26%
35%
34%
43%
21%
30%
4%
8%
64%
73%
Fresno 07-08
80
280
20%
28%
34%
43%
25%
33%
6%
11%
58%
67%
Fresno 06-07
56
206
21%
30%
34%
44%
20%
29%
8%
14%
60%
69%
Fresno 05-06
41
140
17%
27%
29%
41%
28%
40%
5%
12%
51%
64%
Fresno 04-05
70
236
21%
30%
29%
38%
29%
38%
5%
10%
55%
64%
Fresno 03-04
44
157
26%
37%
31%
43%
18%
28%
5%
11%
63%
74%
Fresno 02-03
48
44
28%
45%
17%
33%
28%
45%
0%
5%
53%
70%
Fresno 99-02
126
96
20%
30%
40%
52%
21%
31%
1%
5%
65%
76%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
715
643
1,688
1,961
32%
33%
36%
37%
36%
36%
39%
39%
21%
21%
24%
24%
5%
5%
7%
6%
70%
71%
73%
74%
System 08-09
718
2,579
33%
36%
37%
40%
20%
22%
5%
6%
72%
75%
System 07-08
994
3,500
32%
34%
38%
40%
22%
24%
5%
6%
71%
73%
System 06-07
1,020
3,665
33%
35%
37%
39%
21%
23%
6%
7%
71%
73%
System 05-06
794
2,859
29%
31%
36%
39%
24%
26%
7%
8%
66%
69%
System 04-05
1,031
3,642
31%
33%
37%
39%
24%
26%
5%
6%
68%
71%
System 03-04
1,203
4,289
32%
34%
37%
39%
23%
25%
5%
6%
69%
72%
System 02-03
920
860
27%
30%
36%
40%
26%
29%
5%
6%
65%
69%
System 99-02
2,774
1,902
27%
30%
39%
42%
25%
27%
5%
6%
68%
70%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 48
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite C-1: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Plan Instruction (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 80%
Adequately Prepared
42%
Fresno 08-09 81%
44%
Fresno 07-08 84%
45%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 02-03 81%
Fresno 99-02 81%
System 10-11 85%
System 09-10 86%
System 08-09 85%
System 07-08 85%
14%
34%
36%
38%
50%
17%
2%
17%
2%
14%
2%
12%
35%
52%
2%
2%
35%
50%
3%
16%
35%
51%
2%
13%
35%
43%
2%
15%
45%
51%
2%
14%
36%
45%
3%
17%
39%
47%
3%
14%
37%
38%
Fresno 04-05 85%
Fresno 03-04 82%
17%
38%
46%
Fresno 06-07 82%
Not-at-All Prepared
38%
46%
Fresno 09-10 84%
Fresno 05-06 83%
Somewhat Prepared
33%
35%
2%
14%
2%
13%
2%
13%
2%
System 06-07 85%
50%
System 05-06 84%
49%
35%
13%
3%
System 04-05 83%
50%
33%
14%
3%
System 03-04 85%
49%
36%
13%
System 02-03 83%
47%
36%
14%
System 99-02 83%
47%
36%
15%
0%
25%
50%
75%
2%
3%
2%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 49
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite C-1: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Plan Instruction (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
87
109
462
572
39%
43%
44%
48%
36%
35%
41%
40%
15%
12%
19%
16%
2%
2%
4%
4%
78%
82%
82%
85%
Fresno 08-09
104
589
42%
47%
34%
39%
15%
19%
1%
3%
79%
83%
Fresno 07-08
216
1,235
43%
47%
37%
41%
12%
15%
2%
3%
83%
85%
Fresno 06-07
129
705
44%
49%
34%
39%
13%
17%
2%
3%
81%
84%
Fresno 05-06
65
353
35%
41%
42%
48%
12%
16%
2%
4%
80%
85%
Fresno 04-05
171
948
49%
53%
32%
36%
12%
14%
2%
3%
84%
86%
Fresno 03-04
239
972
45%
49%
33%
37%
15%
18%
1%
2%
81%
83%
Fresno 02-03
118
647
42%
47%
34%
38%
15%
19%
2%
3%
79%
83%
Fresno 99-02
260
1,058
41%
45%
36%
40%
15%
18%
2%
3%
80%
83%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
731
738
3,733
3,886
49%
50%
51%
52%
34%
35%
36%
36%
13%
11%
14%
12%
2%
2%
2%
2%
84%
86%
85%
87%
System 08-09
1,098
5,811
49%
51%
34%
35%
13%
14%
2%
2%
84%
85%
System 07-08
2,143
11,606
51%
52%
33%
34%
12%
13%
2%
2%
85%
86%
System 06-07
2,487
13,377
49%
50%
34%
35%
12%
13%
2%
3%
84%
85%
System 05-06
1,346
7,111
48%
50%
34%
36%
13%
13%
3%
3%
83%
85%
System 04-05
2,165
11,526
50%
51%
33%
34%
13%
14%
3%
3%
83%
84%
System 03-04
3,458
13,089
48%
49%
35%
36%
13%
13%
2%
3%
84%
85%
System 02-03
2,042
11,177
46%
47%
36%
37%
14%
15%
2%
3%
82%
83%
System 99-02
6,095
17,287
47%
47%
36%
37%
14%
15%
2%
2%
83%
84%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 50
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite C-1: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Plan Instruction (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 77%
Somewhat Prepared
36%
39%
38%
Fresno 08-09 78%
38%
40%
42%
Fresno 06-07 75%
34%
Fresno 05-06 72%
34%
Fresno 04-05 74%
34%
Not-at-All Prepared
41%
Fresno 09-10 77%
Fresno 07-08 79%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
19%
5%
18%
5%
37%
41%
19%
3%
17%
4%
21%
38%
5%
24%
40%
5%
20%
6%
Fresno 03-04 76%
38%
38%
19%
5%
Fresno 02-03 76%
39%
37%
20%
4%
Fresno 99-02 82%
44%
System 10-11 81%
44%
System 09-10 80%
46%
System 08-09 82%
45%
System 07-08 80%
System 06-07 79%
System 05-06 78%
38%
15%
37%
16%
34%
16%
37%
44%
14%
36%
42%
37%
41%
37%
2%
3%
4%
3%
16%
3%
17%
3%
18%
4%
System 04-05 80%
43%
37%
17%
4%
System 03-04 80%
44%
36%
17%
4%
System 02-03 80%
44%
System 99-02 80%
0%
36%
43%
25%
16%
37%
50%
16%
75%
3%
4%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 51
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite C-1: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Plan Instruction (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
143
126
979
858
34%
37%
38%
41%
39%
36%
43%
40%
18%
17%
21%
20%
4%
4%
5%
6%
74%
75%
78%
79%
Fresno 08-09
165
1,171
37%
40%
38%
41%
18%
21%
2%
3%
76%
80%
Fresno 07-08
223
1,595
41%
44%
36%
39%
16%
18%
3%
4%
78%
81%
Fresno 06-07
181
1,330
32%
36%
39%
42%
19%
22%
4%
5%
73%
76%
Fresno 05-06
115
850
32%
36%
36%
40%
22%
26%
4%
6%
69%
73%
Fresno 04-05
248
1,750
33%
36%
39%
42%
18%
21%
5%
6%
74%
76%
Fresno 03-04
156
1,174
36%
40%
36%
40%
18%
21%
4%
5%
74%
78%
Fresno 02-03
157
1,198
37%
41%
36%
39%
18%
21%
3%
4%
75%
78%
Fresno 99-02
316
1,182
43%
46%
36%
40%
14%
16%
2%
3%
81%
84%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,254
1,420
8,197
9,282
43%
46%
45%
47%
36%
34%
38%
35%
15%
15%
16%
16%
3%
3%
4%
4%
80%
80%
82%
81%
System 08-09
1,691
11,910
45%
46%
37%
38%
14%
15%
3%
3%
82%
83%
System 07-08
2,896
20,308
44%
45%
36%
36%
16%
17%
3%
4%
80%
81%
System 06-07
3,524
25,119
42%
43%
37%
38%
17%
17%
3%
4%
79%
80%
System 05-06
2,091
15,133
41%
42%
36%
37%
18%
18%
4%
4%
77%
78%
System 04-05
3,487
25,310
42%
43%
37%
37%
16%
17%
3%
4%
79%
80%
System 03-04
3,690
27,317
43%
44%
36%
37%
16%
17%
3%
4%
79%
80%
System 02-03
2,836
21,482
44%
45%
35%
36%
16%
17%
3%
4%
80%
81%
System 99-02
6,219
25,581
43%
44%
37%
38%
16%
16%
3%
4%
80%
81%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 52
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite C-2: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Motivate Students (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 09-10 83%
42%
Fresno 08-09 79%
42%
35%
14%
Fresno 06-07 84%
43%
10%
54%
30%
Fresno 03-04 81%
47%
34%
Fresno 02-03 82%
47%
35%
15%
13%
17%
51%
50%
System 08-09 81%
49%
5%
2%
3%
5%
3%
33%
13%
3%
36%
11%
4%
32%
52%
System 07-08 84%
2%
15%
39%
System 09-10 86%
1%
14%
48%
42%
2%
18%
41%
36%
6%
18%
37%
Fresno 04-05 84%
System 10-11 84%
6%
11%
37%
44%
Fresno 99-02 81%
Not-at-All Prepared
41%
Fresno 07-08 81%
Fresno 05-06 84%
Somewhat Prepared
45%
Fresno 10-11 80%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
16%
32%
13%
3%
3%
System 06-07 83%
49%
34%
13%
4%
System 05-06 82%
48%
34%
13%
4%
31%
14%
4%
33%
13%
4%
14%
3%
15%
3%
System 04-05 83%
System 03-04 83%
System 02-03 83%
System 99-02 83%
0%
52%
50%
47%
36%
46%
25%
37%
50%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 53
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite C-2: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Motivate Students (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
87
109
280
347
42%
39%
49%
46%
32%
37%
39%
44%
12%
9%
17%
13%
4%
4%
7%
8%
77%
81%
83%
86%
Fresno 08-09
104
354
39%
46%
34%
41%
16%
21%
1%
3%
77%
82%
Fresno 07-08
216
771
41%
46%
35%
39%
16%
20%
1%
2%
79%
83%
Fresno 06-07
129
438
40%
46%
39%
44%
12%
16%
1%
2%
83%
87%
Fresno 05-06
65
223
32%
40%
44%
52%
7%
12%
4%
7%
82%
88%
Fresno 04-05
171
602
51%
56%
27%
32%
13%
17%
1%
3%
81%
85%
Fresno 03-04
239
618
45%
50%
32%
36%
14%
17%
2%
4%
79%
83%
Fresno 02-03
118
416
44%
50%
32%
38%
11%
15%
3%
6%
80%
84%
Fresno 99-02
260
596
39%
44%
36%
41%
15%
18%
3%
4%
78%
82%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
731
738
2,338
2,465
49%
48%
52%
51%
32%
35%
34%
37%
12%
10%
14%
12%
3%
3%
4%
4%
83%
84%
85%
86%
System 08-09
1,098
3,593
48%
50%
31%
33%
15%
17%
2%
3%
81%
82%
System 07-08
2,143
7,352
51%
53%
31%
32%
13%
14%
3%
3%
83%
84%
System 06-07
2,487
8,575
49%
50%
33%
34%
13%
14%
3%
4%
82%
83%
System 05-06
1,346
4,533
47%
49%
34%
35%
13%
14%
4%
4%
82%
83%
System 04-05
2,165
7,429
51%
52%
30%
31%
13%
14%
4%
4%
82%
83%
System 03-04
3,458
8,460
49%
50%
33%
34%
13%
14%
3%
4%
83%
84%
System 02-03
2,042
7,214
46%
48%
35%
37%
14%
15%
3%
3%
82%
83%
System 99-02
6,095
9,798
45%
47%
36%
37%
15%
15%
2%
3%
82%
83%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 54
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite C-2: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Motivate Students (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 74%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 09-10 80%
Adequately Prepared
Somewhat Prepared
37%
Not-at-All Prepared
37%
36%
22%
44%
Fresno 08-09 78%
38%
40%
Fresno 07-08 77%
39%
38%
Fresno 06-07 71%
32%
39%
Fresno 05-06 73%
31%
42%
Fresno 04-05 74%
32%
Fresno 03-04 76%
32%
16%
19%
19%
22%
42%
44%
Fresno 02-03 78%
39%
Fresno 99-02 82%
39%
4%
4%
22%
5%
21%
5%
4%
18%
43%
3%
7%
20%
39%
5%
3%
15%
3%
System 10-11 81%
43%
38%
16%
3%
System 09-10 81%
43%
38%
15%
4%
System 08-09 81%
43%
38%
16%
3%
System 07-08 79%
40%
39%
17%
4%
System 06-07 79%
39%
40%
18%
3%
37%
40%
18%
4%
System 04-05 77%
38%
39%
18%
4%
System 03-04 77%
38%
19%
4%
System 05-06 77%
39%
System 02-03 79%
40%
39%
System 99-02 80%
40%
40%
0%
25%
50%
17%
17%
75%
4%
3%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 55
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite C-2: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Motivate Students (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
143
126
699
595
35%
33%
40%
38%
35%
41%
39%
47%
20%
14%
24%
18%
3%
4%
5%
6%
72%
77%
77%
82%
Fresno 08-09
165
854
36%
40%
38%
43%
17%
20%
2%
4%
77%
80%
Fresno 07-08
223
1,169
37%
41%
36%
40%
17%
21%
4%
5%
75%
78%
Fresno 06-07
181
958
30%
34%
37%
41%
20%
24%
6%
8%
69%
73%
Fresno 05-06
115
623
28%
33%
40%
45%
19%
24%
4%
6%
71%
76%
Fresno 04-05
248
1,302
30%
33%
40%
44%
20%
23%
5%
6%
72%
75%
Fresno 03-04
156
897
30%
34%
41%
46%
18%
22%
3%
5%
74%
78%
Fresno 02-03
157
921
37%
42%
37%
41%
17%
20%
2%
4%
77%
80%
Fresno 99-02
316
521
36%
41%
40%
46%
13%
17%
2%
4%
80%
84%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,254
1,420
6,016
6,746
42%
43%
44%
44%
37%
37%
39%
39%
15%
14%
17%
15%
3%
4%
3%
4%
80%
80%
82%
82%
System 08-09
1,691
8,499
42%
44%
38%
39%
15%
16%
3%
3%
81%
82%
System 07-08
2,896
15,071
40%
41%
38%
39%
17%
18%
3%
4%
79%
79%
System 06-07
3,524
18,280
38%
39%
40%
40%
17%
18%
3%
4%
78%
79%
System 05-06
2,091
11,215
37%
38%
39%
41%
18%
19%
4%
5%
77%
78%
System 04-05
3,487
18,881
38%
39%
39%
40%
18%
19%
4%
4%
77%
78%
System 03-04
3,690
20,702
38%
39%
39%
40%
18%
19%
4%
4%
77%
78%
System 02-03
2,836
16,609
39%
40%
39%
40%
17%
18%
3%
4%
79%
79%
System 99-02
6,219
11,387
39%
40%
40%
41%
17%
17%
3%
3%
80%
81%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 56
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite C-3: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Manage Instruction (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 77%
Fresno 09-10 81%
44%
Fresno 07-08 81%
43%
Fresno 03-04 79%
16%
37%
18%
38%
35%
41%
41%
48%
3%
2%
17%
2%
14%
33%
2%
17%
14%
35%
46%
7%
17%
37%
46%
Fresno 04-05 83%
Not-at-All Prepared
35%
42%
Fresno 05-06 82%
Somewhat Prepared
42%
Fresno 08-09 79%
Fresno 06-07 81%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
4%
3%
18%
2%
Fresno 02-03 80%
41%
39%
17%
4%
Fresno 99-02 79%
41%
38%
18%
3%
15%
4%
System 10-11 81%
46%
35%
System 09-10 84%
48%
36%
System 08-09 82%
49%
33%
System 07-08 83%
50%
13%
33%
3%
15%
3%
14%
3%
System 06-07 82%
48%
34%
15%
4%
System 05-06 81%
47%
34%
15%
4%
System 04-05 81%
49%
32%
15%
4%
System 03-04 81%
48%
33%
15%
4%
System 02-03 82%
System 99-02 81%
0%
41%
41%
45%
25%
36%
50%
16%
3%
16%
3%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 57
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite C-3: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Manage Instruction (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
87
109
452
579
38%
41%
45%
47%
32%
34%
38%
40%
14%
15%
19%
19%
5%
1%
9%
3%
74%
79%
79%
83%
Fresno 08-09
104
577
39%
45%
35%
40%
16%
20%
2%
4%
77%
82%
Fresno 07-08
216
1,211
41%
45%
36%
40%
16%
19%
2%
3%
79%
82%
Fresno 06-07
129
704
43%
49%
32%
38%
15%
19%
1%
3%
79%
83%
Fresno 05-06
65
352
37%
44%
37%
44%
12%
17%
3%
6%
78%
84%
Fresno 04-05
171
926
46%
51%
32%
37%
12%
16%
2%
4%
81%
85%
Fresno 03-04
239
962
43%
48%
31%
36%
17%
20%
2%
3%
77%
81%
Fresno 02-03
118
632
38%
43%
36%
41%
15%
19%
3%
5%
77%
82%
Fresno 99-02
260
1,031
39%
43%
36%
40%
16%
20%
2%
4%
77%
81%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
731
738
3,660
3,803
45%
47%
47%
49%
34%
35%
36%
37%
14%
12%
16%
14%
4%
3%
4%
4%
80%
83%
82%
85%
System 08-09
1,098
5,696
48%
50%
32%
34%
15%
16%
2%
3%
81%
83%
System 07-08
2,143
11,361
49%
51%
32%
34%
14%
14%
3%
3%
83%
84%
System 06-07
2,487
13,254
47%
48%
33%
35%
14%
15%
3%
4%
81%
82%
System 05-06
1,346
6,974
47%
48%
33%
34%
14%
16%
4%
4%
80%
82%
System 04-05
2,165
11,310
48%
49%
32%
33%
14%
15%
4%
5%
80%
81%
System 03-04
3,458
12,882
48%
49%
33%
34%
14%
15%
4%
4%
81%
82%
System 02-03
2,042
11,020
40%
41%
40%
41%
15%
16%
3%
3%
81%
82%
System 99-02
6,095
19,643
45%
46%
36%
36%
15%
16%
3%
3%
81%
82%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 58
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite C-3: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Manage Instruction (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 69%
33%
Somewhat Prepared
23%
36%
37%
Fresno 08-09 74%
35%
39%
39%
Fresno 06-07 69%
32%
Fresno 05-06 65%
32%
Fresno 04-05 69%
Fresno 03-04 71%
37%
31%
34%
37%
18%
6%
7%
10%
24%
37%
Fresno 99-02 72%
5%
25%
38%
8%
22%
38%
40%
7%
18%
35%
23%
36%
7%
20%
24%
33%
37%
8%
20%
37%
Fresno 02-03 75%
System 10-11 76%
Not-at-All Prepared
36%
Fresno 09-10 73%
Fresno 07-08 76%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
19%
6%
5%
6%
System 09-10 76%
42%
34%
19%
5%
System 08-09 77%
41%
36%
18%
5%
System 07-08 76%
40%
19%
5%
System 06-07 73%
38%
System 05-06 72%
37%
System 04-05 73%
38%
System 03-04 74%
39%
System 02-03 77%
System 99-02 75%
0%
36%
35%
20%
35%
21%
35%
35%
42%
35%
38%
25%
50%
7%
21%
6%
20%
6%
18%
37%
6%
21%
75%
5%
5%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 59
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite C-3: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Manage Instruction (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
143
126
963
848
31%
34%
35%
39%
34%
35%
38%
40%
21%
18%
25%
22%
6%
5%
9%
8%
67%
72%
71%
76%
Fresno 08-09
165
1,154
33%
37%
37%
41%
18%
22%
4%
6%
73%
76%
Fresno 07-08
223
1,574
37%
41%
35%
39%
16%
19%
5%
7%
74%
78%
Fresno 06-07
181
1,312
30%
34%
35%
39%
22%
25%
6%
9%
67%
71%
Fresno 05-06
115
842
29%
34%
31%
35%
23%
27%
9%
12%
62%
67%
Fresno 04-05
248
1,736
29%
32%
36%
39%
22%
25%
7%
9%
66%
70%
Fresno 03-04
156
1,156
32%
36%
35%
39%
20%
24%
6%
8%
69%
73%
Fresno 02-03
157
1,095
35%
40%
36%
40%
17%
20%
5%
7%
74%
78%
Fresno 99-02
316
1,219
35%
39%
33%
37%
21%
25%
4%
6%
70%
74%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,254
1,420
7,987
9,089
39%
41%
40%
42%
35%
34%
37%
35%
18%
18%
20%
19%
5%
5%
6%
6%
75%
75%
76%
77%
System 08-09
1,691
11,680
40%
42%
36%
37%
17%
18%
5%
5%
77%
78%
System 07-08
2,896
19,907
39%
40%
35%
36%
18%
19%
5%
6%
75%
76%
System 06-07
3,524
24,702
38%
39%
35%
36%
20%
21%
6%
6%
73%
74%
System 05-06
2,091
14,830
36%
38%
34%
36%
21%
22%
6%
7%
72%
73%
System 04-05
3,487
24,826
38%
39%
35%
36%
20%
21%
6%
6%
73%
74%
System 03-04
3,690
26,781
39%
40%
35%
36%
19%
20%
6%
6%
74%
75%
System 02-03
2,836
19,559
41%
43%
35%
36%
18%
19%
5%
5%
77%
78%
System 99-02
6,219
24,933
37%
38%
37%
37%
20%
21%
4%
5%
74%
75%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 60
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite C-4: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Use Education Technology (K-12)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
52%
Fresno 10-11 90%
38%
40%
Fresno 05-06 80%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
42%
44%
Fresno 06-07 82%
37%
40%
Fresno 03-04 79%
1%
11%
2%
2%
19%
0%
1%
19%
49%
2%
25%
38%
Fresno 99-02 79%
13%
19%
39%
23%
1%
16%
40%
43%
Fresno 04-05 80%
2%
12%
37%
46%
Fresno 07-08 88%
7%
43%
48%
Fresno 08-09 85%
Not-at-All Prepared
38%
45%
Fresno 09-10 88%
Fresno 02-03 72%
Somewhat Prepared
41%
3%
19%
2%
System 10-11 90%
52%
38%
9%
1%
System 09-10 89%
53%
36%
10%
1%
System 08-09 87%
51%
System 07-08 88%
52%
36%
36%
12%
1%
11%
1%
System 06-07 86%
47%
39%
13%
2%
System 05-06 85%
47%
38%
13%
2%
44%
System 04-05 83%
42%
System 03-04 82%
System 02-03 75%
System 99-02 76%
0%
39%
15%
40%
24%
15%
51%
35%
22%
41%
25%
50%
20%
75%
2%
3%
3%
3%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 61
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite C-4: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Use Education Technology (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
87
109
346
420
49%
42%
55%
47%
36%
40%
41%
45%
6%
10%
9%
13%
1%
1%
3%
2%
89%
85%
92%
89%
Fresno 08-09
104
438
46%
51%
35%
40%
12%
15%
1%
2%
84%
87%
Fresno 07-08
216
915
44%
47%
40%
43%
10%
12%
1%
2%
86%
89%
Fresno 06-07
129
527
42%
47%
35%
40%
14%
17%
2%
3%
80%
84%
Fresno 05-06
65
250
37%
44%
37%
43%
17%
22%
0%
1%
78%
83%
Fresno 04-05
171
675
41%
45%
35%
39%
17%
21%
0%
1%
79%
82%
Fresno 03-04
239
705
38%
42%
37%
41%
18%
21%
1%
2%
77%
81%
Fresno 02-03
118
203
20%
26%
46%
52%
22%
28%
2%
4%
69%
75%
Fresno 99-02
260
125
34%
41%
37%
44%
16%
22%
1%
4%
75%
81%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
731
738
2,650
2,719
50%
52%
53%
54%
37%
35%
39%
37%
9%
9%
10%
10%
1%
1%
1%
2%
89%
88%
90%
90%
System 08-09
1,098
4,116
50%
52%
36%
37%
11%
12%
1%
1%
87%
88%
System 07-08
2,143
8,293
51%
52%
36%
37%
11%
11%
1%
1%
88%
88%
System 06-07
2,487
9,501
46%
47%
38%
39%
12%
13%
2%
2%
85%
86%
System 05-06
1,346
4,922
46%
48%
37%
39%
12%
13%
2%
2%
84%
86%
System 04-05
2,165
7,947
44%
45%
38%
40%
14%
15%
2%
2%
83%
84%
System 03-04
3,458
9,088
41%
42%
39%
40%
15%
16%
3%
3%
81%
82%
System 02-03
2,042
3,400
23%
25%
51%
52%
21%
22%
3%
3%
75%
76%
System 99-02
6,095
2,013
34%
36%
40%
42%
20%
21%
3%
4%
76%
77%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 62
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite C-4: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Use Education Technology (K-12)
Well Prepared
31%
Fresno 10-11 64%
Fresno 08-09 72%
34%
Fresno 07-08 67%
34%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 05-06 55%
23%
Fresno 04-05 57%
23%
31%
Fresno 02-03 64%
27%
26%
34%
28%
24%
32%
34%
29%
35%
33%
System 04-05 62%
28%
34%
24%
11%
System 02-03 66%
30%
36%
36%
25%
24%
26%
26%
28%
50%
10%
10%
10%
11%
27%
34%
26%
23%
27%
31%
9%
11%
25%
System 03-04 65%
8%
24%
34%
28%
0%
12%
34%
System 05-06 61%
System 99-02 62%
14%
30%
32%
11%
10%
29%
34%
6%
11%
35%
32%
System 08-09 68%
22%
31%
37%
34%
22%
33%
31%
System 09-10 66%
14%
38%
33%
Fresno 99-02 67%
10%
23%
34%
27%
System 06-07 64%
27%
32%
Fresno 03-04 58%
Not-at-All Prepared
33%
31%
Fresno 06-07 62%
System 07-08 66%
Somewhat Prepared
33%
Fresno 09-10 64%
System 10-11 66%
Adequately Prepared
75%
10%
9%
8%
10%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 63
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite C-4: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Use Education Technology (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
143
126
778
688
29%
30%
33%
35%
31%
29%
35%
33%
25%
21%
29%
24%
9%
12%
11%
16%
61%
61%
65%
65%
Fresno 08-09
165
914
32%
36%
37%
40%
20%
23%
5%
7%
71%
74%
Fresno 07-08
223
1,297
33%
36%
32%
35%
20%
23%
10%
12%
66%
69%
Fresno 06-07
181
1,073
30%
33%
30%
33%
25%
28%
10%
12%
61%
64%
Fresno 05-06
115
696
21%
25%
30%
34%
33%
37%
9%
12%
53%
57%
Fresno 04-05
248
1,412
22%
24%
33%
35%
28%
31%
13%
15%
56%
59%
Fresno 03-04
156
938
25%
29%
30%
33%
28%
32%
10%
13%
57%
60%
Fresno 02-03
157
486
25%
29%
34%
39%
26%
30%
7%
10%
61%
66%
Fresno 99-02
316
319
30%
36%
31%
37%
21%
26%
8%
11%
64%
70%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,254
1,420
6,217
7,041
31%
33%
32%
34%
33%
32%
34%
33%
23%
23%
25%
24%
10%
10%
11%
11%
64%
65%
66%
67%
System 08-09
1,691
9,310
33%
34%
34%
35%
22%
23%
9%
10%
67%
68%
System 07-08
2,896
15,921
32%
32%
34%
34%
24%
24%
10%
10%
66%
66%
System 06-07
3,524
19,822
29%
29%
35%
36%
25%
26%
10%
11%
64%
65%
System 05-06
2,091
11,884
28%
29%
33%
34%
27%
28%
11%
11%
61%
62%
System 04-05
3,487
19,986
28%
29%
34%
35%
27%
28%
10%
10%
62%
63%
System 03-04
3,690
21,713
30%
31%
34%
35%
25%
26%
9%
10%
65%
65%
System 02-03
2,836
8,696
29%
30%
35%
36%
25%
26%
8%
9%
65%
66%
System 99-02
6,219
6,767
26%
27%
36%
37%
27%
28%
10%
10%
62%
63%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 64
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite C-5: School Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation of
MS-SS-ES Teachers for Pedagogical Practices Across the Curriculum (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 80%
Fresno 08-09 79%
42%
Fresno 07-08 82%
41%
Fresno 06-07 80%
41%
15%
46%
Fresno 99-02 82%
42%
38%
47%
System 09-10 84%
47%
37%
19%
2%
2%
3%
17%
36%
14%
37%
2%
3%
13%
36%
48%
4%
18%
36%
46%
2%
14%
40%
System 10-11 83%
2%
18%
46%
43%
2%
16%
39%
Fresno 02-03 79%
3%
20%
41%
34%
4%
14%
37%
44%
System 07-08 83%
16%
41%
Fresno 03-04 81%
System 08-09 82%
Not-at-All Prepared
40%
42%
Fresno 04-05 84%
Somewhat Prepared
40%
Fresno 09-10 83%
Fresno 05-06 80%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
2%
2%
16%
35%
14%
2%
System 06-07 83%
46%
37%
15%
3%
System 05-06 82%
45%
37%
15%
3%
14%
3%
14%
3%
System 04-05 82%
System 03-04 83%
47%
46%
System 02-03 82%
44%
System 99-02 84%
45%
0%
35%
25%
37%
38%
16%
39%
50%
14%
75%
2%
2%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 65
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite C-5: School Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation of
MS-SS-ES Teachers for Pedagogical Practices Across the Curriculum (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
87
109
765
964
38%
41%
42%
44%
38%
39%
41%
43%
15%
13%
17%
15%
3%
2%
5%
4%
78%
82%
81%
85%
Fresno 08-09
104
1,010
40%
44%
35%
38%
19%
21%
1%
2%
77%
80%
Fresno 07-08
216
2,013
40%
42%
39%
42%
15%
17%
2%
2%
81%
83%
Fresno 06-07
129
1,127
39%
42%
38%
41%
17%
19%
2%
3%
79%
81%
Fresno 05-06
65
586
32%
36%
44%
49%
14%
17%
3%
5%
79%
82%
Fresno 04-05
171
1,579
44%
47%
36%
39%
13%
15%
2%
3%
82%
84%
Fresno 03-04
239
1,578
42%
45%
36%
38%
17%
19%
2%
2%
79%
82%
Fresno 02-03
118
1,077
41%
44%
35%
38%
17%
20%
2%
3%
78%
80%
Fresno 99-02
260
1,834
41%
43%
39%
41%
16%
17%
1%
2%
81%
83%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
731
738
6,505
6,799
46%
46%
47%
48%
36%
37%
37%
38%
14%
13%
15%
14%
2%
2%
3%
3%
83%
84%
84%
85%
System 08-09
1,098
10,029
46%
47%
36%
37%
15%
16%
2%
2%
82%
83%
System 07-08
2,143
19,584
48%
49%
35%
36%
14%
14%
2%
2%
83%
84%
System 06-07
2,487
22,144
45%
46%
36%
37%
15%
15%
2%
3%
82%
83%
System 05-06
1,346
11,981
45%
46%
37%
38%
14%
15%
3%
3%
82%
83%
System 04-05
2,165
19,393
47%
48%
35%
35%
14%
15%
3%
3%
82%
83%
System 03-04
3,458
21,938
46%
46%
36%
37%
14%
15%
3%
3%
83%
83%
System 02-03
2,042
18,361
43%
44%
38%
38%
16%
16%
2%
3%
81%
82%
System 99-02
6,095
32,818
45%
45%
38%
39%
14%
15%
2%
2%
84%
84%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 66
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite C-5: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess Their CSU
Preparation for Pedagogical Practices Across the Curriculum (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 75%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Not-at-All Prepared
41%
37%
19%
37%
34%
20%
39%
36%
Fresno 07-08 75%
Fresno 06-07 70%
Somewhat Prepared
34%
Fresno 09-10 74%
Fresno 08-09 73%
Adequately Prepared
23%
39%
32%
19%
38%
24%
5%
6%
4%
5%
6%
Fresno 05-06 68%
29%
39%
25%
6%
Fresno 04-05 70%
29%
41%
24%
7%
Fresno 03-04 71%
33%
38%
22%
6%
Fresno 02-03 76%
37%
39%
20%
4%
Fresno 99-02 77%
36%
41%
19%
4%
18%
4%
System 10-11 78%
System 09-10 78%
40%
38%
42%
System 08-09 78%
40%
System 07-08 77%
39%
36%
18%
38%
38%
5%
18%
4%
19%
4%
System 06-07 75%
36%
39%
20%
5%
System 05-06 74%
36%
38%
21%
5%
System 04-05 75%
37%
38%
20%
5%
System 03-04 75%
38%
37%
20%
5%
System 02-03 76%
38%
System 99-02 75%
0%
38%
36%
19%
39%
25%
50%
21%
75%
4%
5%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 67
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite C-5: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess Their CSU
Preparation for Pedagogical Practices Across the Curriculum (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
143
126
1,951
1,714
33%
35%
36%
38%
40%
36%
42%
39%
18%
19%
20%
22%
5%
5%
6%
6%
74%
73%
76%
75%
Fresno 08-09
165
2,420
33%
36%
38%
40%
22%
24%
3%
4%
72%
74%
Fresno 07-08
223
3,135
35%
37%
38%
40%
19%
20%
5%
6%
74%
76%
Fresno 06-07
181
2,567
30%
33%
37%
39%
23%
25%
6%
7%
69%
71%
Fresno 05-06
115
1,666
28%
31%
38%
41%
24%
27%
5%
7%
67%
70%
Fresno 04-05
248
3,468
28%
30%
40%
42%
23%
25%
6%
7%
68%
70%
Fresno 03-04
156
2,355
32%
35%
37%
39%
21%
24%
5%
7%
70%
73%
Fresno 02-03
157
2,295
35%
38%
38%
40%
19%
21%
3%
4%
75%
77%
Fresno 99-02
316
2,530
35%
37%
39%
42%
18%
20%
3%
4%
76%
78%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,254
1,420
16,820
18,923
40%
41%
40%
42%
37%
35%
38%
36%
18%
18%
18%
19%
4%
4%
5%
5%
77%
77%
78%
77%
System 08-09
1,691
24,444
39%
40%
38%
39%
17%
18%
4%
4%
78%
79%
System 07-08
2,896
41,182
38%
39%
38%
38%
19%
19%
4%
5%
76%
77%
System 06-07
3,524
50,192
36%
37%
38%
39%
20%
21%
4%
5%
75%
75%
System 05-06
2,091
30,876
36%
36%
37%
38%
21%
21%
5%
5%
73%
74%
System 04-05
3,487
50,998
36%
37%
38%
39%
20%
21%
5%
5%
75%
75%
System 03-04
3,690
55,276
37%
38%
37%
38%
20%
20%
5%
5%
75%
75%
System 02-03
2,836
42,033
38%
39%
38%
38%
19%
19%
4%
5%
76%
77%
System 99-02
6,219
53,239
36%
36%
38%
39%
20%
21%
5%
5%
75%
75%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 68
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite C-6: School Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation of
MS-SS-ES Teachers to Assess and Reflect on Their Instruction (K-12)
Well Prepared
35%
Fresno 06-07 75%
35%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 04-05 83%
Fresno 03-04 77%
Fresno 02-03 79%
Fresno 99-02 79%
15%
41%
36%
Fresno 07-08 81%
Not-at-All Prepared
40%
38%
Fresno 09-10 79%
Fresno 05-06 77%
Somewhat Prepared
39%
Fresno 10-11 79%
Fresno 08-09 74%
Adequately Prepared
19%
38%
17%
40%
18%
42%
41%
38%
2%
5%
13%
38%
36%
2%
22%
47%
39%
2%
1%
24%
46%
30%
5%
20%
4%
3%
43%
18%
3%
41%
19%
3%
System 10-11 83%
44%
39%
15%
3%
System 09-10 82%
43%
39%
15%
3%
System 08-09 81%
42%
System 07-08 83%
39%
44%
17%
39%
15%
41%
System 05-06 81%
42%
39%
16%
3%
System 04-05 81%
43%
38%
16%
3%
System 03-04 81%
43%
38%
16%
3%
System 99-02 81%
0%
40%
18%
3%
System 06-07 79%
System 02-03 79%
38%
2%
39%
41%
18%
40%
25%
50%
16%
75%
3%
3%
2%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 69
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite C-6: School Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation of
MS-SS-ES Teachers to Assess and Reflect on Their Instruction (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
87
109
249
302
37%
35%
42%
40%
38%
38%
43%
43%
13%
17%
17%
21%
4%
1%
6%
3%
78%
77%
82%
80%
Fresno 08-09
104
328
34%
39%
36%
40%
22%
26%
1%
2%
73%
77%
Fresno 07-08
216
647
34%
37%
44%
47%
16%
18%
2%
3%
80%
82%
Fresno 06-07
129
365
33%
37%
38%
42%
20%
24%
2%
3%
74%
77%
Fresno 05-06
65
195
27%
32%
44%
50%
16%
21%
4%
6%
74%
79%
Fresno 04-05
171
514
41%
44%
39%
43%
12%
15%
3%
4%
82%
84%
Fresno 03-04
239
515
38%
41%
36%
39%
19%
22%
2%
3%
75%
79%
Fresno 02-03
118
350
34%
38%
40%
45%
17%
20%
2%
4%
77%
80%
Fresno 99-02
260
665
36%
39%
40%
43%
17%
20%
2%
3%
78%
80%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
731
738
2,100
2,196
43%
42%
45%
44%
38%
38%
39%
40%
14%
14%
16%
16%
3%
2%
3%
3%
81%
82%
83%
83%
System 08-09
1,098
3,244
41%
42%
38%
39%
17%
18%
2%
2%
80%
81%
System 07-08
2,143
6,389
43%
44%
38%
39%
15%
15%
3%
3%
82%
83%
System 06-07
2,487
7,247
41%
42%
38%
39%
17%
18%
3%
3%
79%
80%
System 05-06
1,346
3,908
41%
42%
38%
40%
15%
16%
3%
4%
80%
81%
System 04-05
2,165
6,360
43%
44%
37%
38%
15%
16%
3%
4%
80%
81%
System 03-04
3,458
7,197
43%
44%
37%
38%
15%
16%
3%
3%
81%
82%
System 02-03
2,042
6,064
40%
41%
39%
40%
17%
18%
3%
3%
79%
80%
System 99-02
6,095
11,291
41%
42%
40%
41%
16%
16%
2%
2%
81%
82%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 70
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite C-6: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Assess and Reflect on Their Instruction (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 76%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 07-08 75%
Somewhat Prepared
34%
Not-at-All Prepared
42%
36%
Fresno 09-10 75%
Fresno 08-09 74%
Adequately Prepared
20%
39%
33%
18%
41%
34%
7%
22%
41%
4%
5%
20%
4%
Fresno 06-07 72%
28%
44%
22%
6%
Fresno 05-06 71%
29%
42%
25%
5%
Fresno 04-05 71%
Fresno 03-04 73%
30%
41%
34%
22%
39%
7%
23%
4%
Fresno 02-03 77%
36%
41%
21%
Fresno 99-02 78%
35%
43%
18%
4%
17%
4%
18%
4%
17%
4%
System 10-11 78%
39%
39%
42%
System 09-10 78%
System 08-09 79%
39%
System 07-08 76%
38%
36%
40%
38%
2%
19%
4%
20%
4%
System 06-07 76%
35%
41%
System 05-06 75%
36%
39%
20%
5%
System 04-05 76%
37%
39%
20%
5%
System 03-04 75%
37%
19%
5%
System 02-03 78%
System 99-02 74%
0%
38%
39%
39%
34%
18%
40%
25%
50%
21%
75%
4%
5%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 71
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite C-6: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Assess and Reflect on Their Instruction (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
143
126
442
369
32%
34%
36%
38%
40%
37%
44%
41%
18%
16%
21%
19%
3%
6%
4%
8%
75%
74%
78%
77%
Fresno 08-09
165
566
31%
35%
39%
43%
20%
23%
4%
5%
72%
75%
Fresno 07-08
223
684
32%
36%
40%
43%
19%
22%
4%
5%
74%
77%
Fresno 06-07
181
547
26%
30%
42%
45%
20%
23%
6%
7%
70%
73%
Fresno 05-06
115
359
27%
31%
39%
44%
23%
27%
4%
6%
69%
73%
Fresno 04-05
248
773
28%
31%
39%
42%
21%
23%
7%
8%
69%
72%
Fresno 03-04
156
530
33%
36%
37%
41%
21%
24%
4%
5%
71%
75%
Fresno 02-03
157
528
35%
38%
39%
43%
19%
22%
2%
3%
76%
79%
Fresno 99-02
316
648
34%
37%
41%
44%
17%
20%
3%
4%
77%
79%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,254
1,420
4,062
4,471
39%
42%
40%
43%
39%
35%
40%
37%
17%
17%
18%
18%
4%
4%
4%
4%
78%
78%
79%
79%
System 08-09
1,691
5,673
39%
40%
40%
41%
16%
17%
4%
4%
79%
80%
System 07-08
2,896
9,609
38%
39%
38%
39%
19%
20%
4%
5%
76%
77%
System 06-07
3,524
11,486
35%
35%
40%
41%
20%
20%
4%
4%
75%
76%
System 05-06
2,091
7,205
35%
36%
38%
39%
20%
21%
5%
5%
74%
75%
System 04-05
3,487
11,840
36%
37%
39%
39%
19%
20%
5%
5%
75%
76%
System 03-04
3,690
12,841
37%
37%
38%
39%
19%
20%
5%
5%
75%
76%
System 02-03
2,836
10,073
38%
39%
39%
40%
18%
19%
4%
4%
77%
78%
System 99-02
6,219
13,527
33%
34%
39%
40%
21%
22%
5%
5%
73%
74%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 72
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite D-1: School Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation of
MS-SS-ES Teachers for Equity and Diversity in Teaching (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 75%
37%
Fresno 09-10 80%
36%
Fresno 08-09 75%
37%
Fresno 07-08 78%
36%
Fresno 06-07 74%
35%
Fresno 05-06 76%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
5%
44%
18%
38%
23%
42%
21%
38%
41%
System 08-09 79%
41%
4%
23%
39%
2%
18%
41%
3%
16%
38%
43%
3%
3%
15%
40%
System 09-10 82%
6%
19%
36%
43%
40%
2%
2%
18%
36%
35%
3%
24%
42%
40%
2%
20%
39%
System 10-11 79%
System 07-08 81%
20%
46%
Fresno 02-03 81%
Fresno 99-02 75%
Not-at-All Prepared
38%
30%
Fresno 04-05 78%
Fresno 03-04 76%
Somewhat Prepared
2%
19%
38%
17%
2%
3%
System 06-07 79%
41%
38%
19%
3%
System 05-06 79%
40%
39%
18%
3%
17%
4%
System 04-05 79%
System 03-04 80%
43%
36%
42%
38%
18%
3%
System 02-03 78%
39%
39%
18%
3%
System 99-02 79%
39%
40%
18%
3%
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 73
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite D-1: School Supervisors Assess CSU Preparation of
MS-SS-ES Teachers for Equity and Diversity in Teaching (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
87
109
738
962
36%
34%
39%
37%
36%
43%
39%
46%
19%
17%
22%
19%
4%
2%
5%
2%
74%
78%
77%
81%
Fresno 08-09
104
951
35%
38%
36%
39%
22%
24%
2%
3%
73%
76%
Fresno 07-08
216
2,005
35%
37%
41%
42%
19%
21%
2%
2%
77%
79%
Fresno 06-07
129
1,152
34%
36%
37%
40%
23%
25%
1%
2%
73%
75%
Fresno 05-06
65
584
28%
32%
44%
48%
17%
20%
5%
7%
74%
78%
Fresno 04-05
171
1,529
41%
43%
35%
38%
18%
20%
2%
3%
78%
79%
Fresno 03-04
239
1,599
39%
41%
34%
37%
20%
22%
3%
4%
74%
76%
Fresno 02-03
118
1,038
41%
44%
37%
40%
14%
16%
4%
5%
80%
82%
Fresno 99-02
260
1,784
34%
36%
39%
41%
22%
24%
2%
2%
74%
76%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
731
738
6,015
6,256
39%
40%
41%
41%
38%
40%
39%
41%
18%
16%
19%
16%
3%
2%
3%
3%
78%
81%
79%
82%
System 08-09
1,098
9,276
41%
42%
37%
38%
18%
19%
2%
2%
79%
79%
System 07-08
2,143
18,751
43%
43%
37%
38%
16%
17%
3%
3%
80%
81%
System 06-07
2,487
22,042
40%
41%
37%
38%
18%
19%
3%
3%
78%
79%
System 05-06
1,346
11,586
40%
40%
38%
39%
17%
18%
3%
4%
79%
79%
System 04-05
2,165
18,706
42%
43%
36%
36%
17%
18%
4%
4%
79%
79%
System 03-04
3,458
21,366
41%
42%
37%
38%
17%
18%
3%
3%
79%
79%
System 02-03
2,042
18,154
39%
39%
39%
40%
18%
18%
3%
4%
78%
79%
System 99-02
6,095
31,549
39%
39%
40%
40%
18%
18%
3%
3%
79%
79%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 74
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite D-1: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess Their CSU
Preparation for Equity and Diversity in Teaching (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 75%
34%
Fresno 09-10 76%
35%
Somewhat Prepared
41%
43%
37%
Fresno 07-08 76%
Not-at-All Prepared
41%
33%
Fresno 08-09 76%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
20%
5%
19%
5%
21%
4%
20%
4%
39%
Fresno 06-07 68%
29%
39%
26%
6%
Fresno 05-06 68%
28%
40%
25%
6%
Fresno 04-05 66%
Fresno 03-04 71%
Fresno 02-03 75%
Fresno 99-02 71%
System 10-11 76%
System 09-10 77%
26%
40%
28%
27%
43%
23%
37%
38%
33%
38%
23%
38%
40%
37%
38%
39%
System 07-08 76%
38%
38%
35%
System 05-06 72%
34%
System 04-05 73%
35%
System 03-04 74%
36%
System 02-03 74%
36%
System 99-02 72%
0%
5%
19%
5%
21%
22%
38%
4%
5%
5%
6%
22%
5%
38%
21%
5%
38%
21%
5%
38%
25%
19%
19%
38%
5%
6%
19%
38%
34%
6%
21%
38%
System 08-09 77%
System 06-07 73%
7%
50%
22%
75%
5%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 75
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite D-1: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess Their CSU
Preparation for Equity and Diversity in Teaching (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
143
126
1,669
1,471
33%
34%
35%
36%
40%
40%
42%
42%
19%
18%
21%
21%
4%
4%
5%
5%
74%
75%
76%
77%
Fresno 08-09
165
1,999
32%
34%
42%
44%
20%
22%
3%
4%
74%
76%
Fresno 07-08
223
2,750
36%
38%
38%
40%
19%
21%
4%
4%
75%
77%
Fresno 06-07
181
2,293
28%
30%
38%
40%
25%
27%
6%
7%
67%
69%
Fresno 05-06
115
1,475
27%
30%
39%
42%
24%
27%
5%
6%
68%
70%
Fresno 04-05
248
3,037
26%
27%
39%
41%
26%
28%
6%
7%
65%
67%
Fresno 03-04
156
2,044
27%
29%
41%
44%
22%
24%
6%
7%
70%
72%
Fresno 02-03
157
2,092
36%
38%
36%
39%
20%
22%
4%
5%
73%
75%
Fresno 99-02
316
2,307
32%
34%
37%
39%
22%
24%
5%
6%
70%
72%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,254
1,420
13,977
16,239
38%
39%
39%
40%
38%
37%
39%
37%
18%
19%
19%
19%
5%
4%
5%
5%
76%
76%
77%
77%
System 08-09
1,691
20,321
38%
39%
38%
39%
18%
19%
4%
4%
77%
78%
System 07-08
2,896
34,754
37%
38%
38%
39%
19%
20%
4%
5%
76%
76%
System 06-07
3,524
43,104
35%
36%
38%
39%
21%
21%
5%
5%
74%
74%
System 05-06
2,091
25,849
34%
35%
38%
39%
21%
22%
6%
6%
72%
73%
System 04-05
3,487
43,415
35%
36%
38%
38%
21%
22%
5%
5%
73%
74%
System 03-04
3,690
47,060
36%
36%
38%
38%
20%
21%
5%
6%
74%
74%
System 02-03
2,836
37,258
36%
36%
38%
38%
21%
21%
5%
5%
74%
74%
System 99-02
6,219
48,507
34%
34%
38%
38%
22%
23%
5%
5%
72%
73%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 76
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite D-2: Primary-Grade Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS Teachers to Teach Young Children (K-3)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 79%
50%
Fresno 09-10 86%
50%
45%
Fresno 06-07 88%
45%
Fresno 02-03 90%
Fresno 99-02 84%
System 10-11 85%
49%
1%
48%
12%
2%
10%
35%
13%
37%
3%
17%
36%
13%
36%
15%
42%
12%
37%
50%
2%
2%
13%
36%
48%
2%
14%
35%
44%
25%
15%
2%
0%
37%
48%
System 03-04 84%
3%
9%
36%
51%
48%
1%
19%
40%
System 04-05 84%
0%
12%
47%
44%
1%
15%
43%
50%
1%
11%
40%
44%
1%
13%
31%
40%
5%
16%
55%
System 07-08 85%
System 99-02 85%
10%
43%
50%
System 02-03 86%
36%
7%
40%
System 08-09 85%
System 05-06 81%
14%
57%
System 09-10 88%
System 06-07 84%
29%
26%
Fresno 04-05 86%
Fresno 03-04 80%
Not-at-All Prepared
42%
Fresno 07-08 85%
Fresno 05-06 83%
Somewhat Prepared
42%
Fresno 08-09 84%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
14%
75%
2%
3%
2%
2%
2%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 77
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite D-2: Primary-Grade Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS Teachers to Teach Young Children (K-3)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
14
18
264
319
46%
46%
54%
53%
25%
32%
33%
39%
11%
7%
17%
12%
5%
4%
9%
7%
76%
83%
82%
88%
Fresno 08-09
11
212
37%
46%
37%
46%
13%
19%
0%
1%
80%
87%
Fresno 07-08
67
1,288
44%
47%
39%
42%
12%
14%
1%
1%
85%
87%
Fresno 06-07
46
915
43%
47%
41%
45%
10%
13%
0%
1%
87%
90%
Fresno 05-06
19
371
23%
29%
54%
61%
13%
17%
1%
2%
81%
86%
Fresno 04-05
48
913
52%
57%
29%
33%
11%
14%
2%
3%
84%
87%
Fresno 03-04
36
688
37%
42%
38%
42%
17%
21%
1%
1%
78%
82%
Fresno 02-03
9
180
38%
48%
42%
51%
6%
11%
0%
3%
87%
93%
Fresno 99-02
16
312
41%
48%
37%
44%
12%
18%
0%
1%
82%
87%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
131
124
2,367
2,273
48%
50%
51%
52%
35%
36%
38%
39%
11%
9%
13%
11%
2%
1%
3%
2%
85%
87%
87%
89%
System 08-09
193
3,599
49%
51%
34%
36%
13%
15%
1%
2%
83%
85%
System 07-08
545
10,429
49%
50%
35%
36%
12%
13%
2%
2%
85%
86%
System 06-07
742
14,193
48%
49%
36%
37%
12%
13%
2%
3%
84%
85%
System 05-06
320
6,123
44%
45%
36%
38%
16%
17%
2%
2%
81%
82%
System 04-05
595
11,333
47%
49%
36%
37%
13%
13%
3%
3%
84%
85%
System 03-04
697
10,963
47%
48%
35%
36%
14%
15%
2%
2%
83%
84%
System 02-03
235
4,270
43%
45%
41%
43%
12%
13%
2%
2%
85%
87%
System 99-02
446
5,323
47%
48%
36%
38%
13%
14%
2%
2%
84%
85%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 78
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite D-2: Multiple-Subject Teachers in Grades K-3
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Teach Young Children
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
42%
Fresno 10-11 81%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 03-04 76%
Fresno 02-03 81%
38%
48%
19%
42%
28%
36%
38%
43%
36%
42%
41%
System 09-10 81%
43%
38%
46%
System 05-06 75%
15%
15%
16%
41%
34%
3%
4%
14%
40%
37%
3%
5%
14%
37%
41%
System 07-08 81%
3%
16%
System 10-11 83%
System 08-09 83%
6%
20%
44%
3%
7%
22%
40%
2%
5%
26%
44%
Fresno 99-02 80%
System 06-07 78%
12%
39%
25%
5%
17%
37%
37%
6%
16%
43%
Fresno 07-08 85%
Fresno 04-05 72%
13%
43%
Fresno 08-09 81%
Fresno 06-07 76%
Not-at-All Prepared
39%
35%
Fresno 09-10 78%
Fresno 05-06 67%
Somewhat Prepared
19%
41%
21%
2%
3%
3%
4%
System 04-05 77%
37%
40%
19%
4%
System 03-04 77%
38%
39%
19%
4%
System 02-03 79%
System 99-02 78%
0%
41%
38%
39%
17%
39%
25%
50%
19%
75%
3%
4%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 79
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite D-2: Multiple-Subject Teachers in Grades K-3
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Teach Young Children
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
43
29
887
623
40%
33%
44%
38%
36%
41%
41%
46%
12%
14%
15%
18%
5%
4%
7%
6%
79%
76%
83%
81%
Fresno 08-09
48
1,049
41%
45%
36%
40%
15%
18%
2%
3%
79%
83%
Fresno 07-08
81
1,765
47%
50%
35%
38%
11%
13%
2%
3%
84%
86%
Fresno 06-07
64
1,385
35%
38%
38%
41%
17%
20%
4%
6%
74%
78%
Fresno 05-06
45
1,025
23%
27%
40%
44%
24%
28%
6%
8%
65%
69%
Fresno 04-05
92
2,036
26%
29%
42%
45%
21%
23%
6%
7%
70%
73%
Fresno 03-04
49
1,115
34%
38%
38%
42%
19%
22%
3%
4%
75%
78%
Fresno 02-03
43
962
36%
40%
41%
46%
14%
17%
2%
3%
80%
83%
Fresno 99-02
66
746
42%
46%
34%
38%
13%
17%
4%
6%
78%
82%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
365
423
7,401
8,746
41%
42%
43%
44%
40%
38%
42%
39%
13%
15%
14%
16%
3%
3%
3%
4%
82%
81%
84%
82%
System 08-09
467
10,127
45%
46%
37%
38%
14%
15%
2%
3%
83%
84%
System 07-08
927
20,208
41%
41%
39%
40%
16%
16%
3%
3%
80%
81%
System 06-07
1,182
25,921
36%
37%
40%
41%
19%
20%
3%
4%
77%
78%
System 05-06
525
11,763
33%
34%
41%
42%
20%
21%
4%
4%
75%
76%
System 04-05
1,148
25,548
37%
38%
39%
40%
18%
19%
4%
4%
77%
77%
System 03-04
1,101
24,577
38%
39%
38%
39%
19%
20%
4%
4%
76%
77%
System 02-03
900
20,170
41%
42%
38%
39%
17%
18%
3%
3%
79%
80%
System 99-02
1,305
17,107
38%
39%
38%
39%
18%
19%
4%
4%
77%
78%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 80
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite D-3: Middle-Grade Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS Teachers to Teach Middle-Grade Pupils (4-8)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 75%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 05-06 80%
37%
36%
2%
11%
10%
35%
35%
14%
34%
16%
37%
13%
46%
44%
3%
23%
43%
46%
Fresno 02-03 83%
4%
17%
38%
48%
Fresno 03-04 82%
3%
18%
49%
Fresno 04-05 84%
3%
13%
38%
44%
36%
System 10-11 80%
22%
39%
40%
Fresno 06-07 74%
Not-at-All Prepared
35%
44%
Fresno 07-08 80%
Fresno 99-02 81%
Somewhat Prepared
40%
Fresno 09-10 83%
Fresno 08-09 78%
Adequately Prepared
1%
2%
4%
19%
36%
17%
38%
12%
1%
3%
System 09-10 85%
47%
System 08-09 81%
47%
34%
16%
3%
System 07-08 82%
47%
35%
15%
3%
3%
System 06-07 81%
45%
36%
16%
3%
System 05-06 81%
45%
36%
16%
3%
System 04-05 80%
47%
System 03-04 81%
45%
System 02-03 83%
45%
System 99-02 81%
0%
33%
36%
16%
38%
43%
25%
16%
38%
50%
4%
3%
15%
2%
17%
1%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 81
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite D-3: Middle-Grade Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS Teachers to Teach Middle-Grade Pupils (4-8)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
33
51
442
674
37%
42%
43%
47%
33%
37%
38%
42%
19%
11%
24%
14%
2%
3%
4%
4%
73%
82%
78%
86%
Fresno 08-09
40
523
38%
43%
35%
40%
16%
20%
3%
5%
76%
80%
Fresno 07-08
82
1,172
43%
46%
34%
37%
16%
18%
2%
3%
79%
82%
Fresno 06-07
38
530
34%
39%
35%
40%
21%
26%
1%
3%
72%
77%
Fresno 05-06
15
229
33%
41%
39%
47%
8%
13%
7%
12%
77%
83%
Fresno 04-05
60
886
47%
51%
33%
37%
13%
16%
1%
2%
83%
86%
Fresno 03-04
59
683
46%
50%
32%
36%
14%
17%
2%
3%
80%
84%
Fresno 02-03
15
220
41%
50%
33%
41%
10%
16%
3%
6%
79%
86%
Fresno 99-02
21
298
31%
38%
42%
49%
16%
21%
0%
1%
78%
83%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
217
241
2,871
3,189
43%
46%
45%
48%
35%
37%
37%
39%
16%
11%
18%
13%
3%
3%
3%
4%
79%
84%
81%
85%
System 08-09
322
4,204
46%
48%
33%
35%
15%
17%
2%
3%
81%
82%
System 07-08
722
9,951
46%
48%
34%
35%
14%
15%
3%
4%
81%
82%
System 06-07
879
12,385
44%
45%
35%
36%
15%
16%
3%
4%
80%
81%
System 05-06
465
6,589
45%
46%
35%
36%
15%
16%
3%
4%
80%
81%
System 04-05
749
10,472
46%
47%
32%
33%
16%
17%
4%
5%
79%
80%
System 03-04
861
9,810
44%
46%
35%
37%
15%
16%
3%
4%
80%
81%
System 02-03
278
3,882
44%
46%
37%
39%
15%
16%
2%
2%
82%
83%
System 99-02
589
5,632
42%
44%
37%
39%
17%
18%
1%
2%
81%
82%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 82
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite D-3: Teaching Graduates in Grades 4-8 Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Teach Middle-Grade Students
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 71%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 02-03 73%
Fresno 99-02 75%
41%
7%
22%
43%
31%
19%
41%
38%
27%
9%
20%
41%
6%
27%
40%
9%
26%
35%
38%
38%
8%
22%
37%
4%
6%
24%
36%
23%
5%
18%
43%
25%
Fresno 05-06 74%
Fresno 03-04 67%
22%
35%
Fresno 07-08 74%
Not-at-All Prepared
42%
31%
Fresno 08-09 78%
Fresno 04-05 64%
Somewhat Prepared
29%
Fresno 09-10 72%
Fresno 06-07 66%
Adequately Prepared
5%
20%
5%
System 10-11 78%
40%
38%
18%
5%
System 09-10 77%
40%
37%
19%
4%
42%
System 08-09 81%
System 07-08 77%
37%
System 06-07 74%
36%
System 05-06 75%
37%
System 04-05 75%
36%
System 03-04 73%
System 02-03 75%
System 99-02 75%
0%
39%
16%
40%
19%
38%
35%
5%
38%
20%
5%
39%
20%
5%
22%
38%
36%
39%
25%
4%
21%
38%
37%
3%
50%
6%
20%
5%
21%
5%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 83
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite D-3: Teaching Graduates in Grades 4-8 Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Teach Middle-Grade Students
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
79
67
1,310
1,087
27%
29%
30%
33%
41%
40%
44%
43%
20%
21%
23%
24%
6%
4%
8%
6%
69%
71%
73%
74%
Fresno 08-09
76
1,281
34%
37%
41%
44%
17%
20%
3%
5%
76%
79%
Fresno 07-08
88
1,503
30%
33%
42%
45%
18%
20%
6%
7%
73%
76%
Fresno 06-07
82
1,405
24%
27%
39%
43%
23%
26%
8%
10%
65%
68%
Fresno 05-06
33
592
34%
39%
35%
40%
18%
22%
5%
7%
71%
76%
Fresno 04-05
95
1,695
21%
24%
40%
43%
26%
29%
8%
9%
63%
65%
Fresno 03-04
68
1,252
25%
28%
38%
41%
24%
28%
7%
9%
65%
68%
Fresno 02-03
78
1,407
34%
37%
37%
40%
20%
23%
4%
5%
72%
75%
Fresno 99-02
74
814
36%
41%
34%
39%
19%
22%
4%
6%
73%
77%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
536
649
8,707
10,404
39%
40%
40%
41%
37%
36%
38%
37%
18%
18%
19%
19%
4%
4%
5%
5%
77%
77%
78%
78%
System 08-09
686
11,462
42%
43%
38%
39%
16%
17%
3%
3%
80%
81%
System 07-08
1,155
19,691
37%
38%
39%
40%
18%
19%
4%
4%
77%
78%
System 06-07
1,458
25,098
36%
37%
37%
38%
21%
21%
5%
5%
74%
74%
System 05-06
787
13,817
36%
37%
38%
39%
19%
20%
5%
5%
75%
76%
System 04-05
1,446
25,727
35%
36%
39%
40%
20%
20%
5%
5%
75%
75%
System 03-04
1,491
26,514
34%
35%
37%
38%
22%
22%
5%
6%
72%
73%
System 02-03
1,145
20,292
36%
37%
38%
39%
20%
21%
5%
5%
75%
75%
System 99-02
1,597
17,806
35%
36%
38%
39%
20%
21%
5%
5%
74%
75%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 84
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite D-4: High School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of SS Teachers to Teach High School Students (9-12)
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
30%
Fresno 10-11 75%
Fresno 08-09 71%
37%
Fresno 07-08 78%
37%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
18%
19%
System 10-11 79%
40%
17%
46%
38%
35%
System 05-06 82%
47%
35%
System 04-05 81%
47%
System 03-04 85%
48%
0%
25%
15%
3%
5%
16%
4%
13%
38%
14%
38%
50%
3%
13%
37%
48%
2%
3%
14%
34%
45%
4%
17%
35%
0%
14%
38%
46%
System 99-02 86%
0%
14%
39%
48%
2%
25%
System 06-07 81%
System 02-03 83%
13%
45%
43%
0%
4%
38%
52%
41%
3%
16%
42%
23%
3%
41%
46%
1%
3%
20%
34%
35%
Fresno 99-02 86%
System 07-08 83%
26%
41%
Fresno 03-04 84%
System 08-09 81%
14%
34%
42%
Fresno 05-06 83%
7%
35%
45%
Fresno 06-07 79%
System 09-10 84%
18%
50%
Fresno 04-05 77%
Not-at-All Prepared
45%
Fresno 09-10 85%
Fresno 02-03 75%
Somewhat Prepared
12%
75%
3%
2%
1%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 85
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite D-4: High School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of SS Teachers to Teach High School Students (9-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
29
43
350
524
28%
48%
33%
52%
42%
33%
48%
38%
15%
12%
20%
16%
5%
0%
8%
1%
73%
83%
78%
87%
Fresno 08-09
38
482
35%
40%
31%
36%
24%
29%
2%
3%
69%
73%
Fresno 07-08
61
728
35%
39%
39%
43%
18%
21%
2%
3%
76%
79%
Fresno 06-07
40
452
42%
47%
32%
37%
16%
20%
2%
4%
77%
81%
Fresno 05-06
24
273
39%
46%
38%
45%
14%
19%
0%
0%
81%
86%
Fresno 04-05
49
555
33%
37%
40%
44%
17%
20%
3%
5%
75%
79%
Fresno 03-04
52
520
44%
49%
36%
41%
11%
15%
2%
3%
83%
87%
Fresno 02-03
6
77
18%
28%
45%
58%
20%
31%
0%
0%
69%
80%
Fresno 99-02
17
206
37%
44%
41%
49%
12%
17%
0%
0%
83%
88%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
258
263
3,012
3,108
39%
45%
41%
47%
38%
37%
40%
39%
17%
14%
18%
15%
3%
2%
4%
3%
78%
83%
80%
84%
System 08-09
417
4,861
42%
43%
37%
38%
16%
18%
2%
3%
80%
81%
System 07-08
590
7,012
47%
49%
35%
36%
14%
15%
3%
3%
83%
84%
System 06-07
601
6,956
46%
47%
35%
36%
15%
16%
3%
4%
81%
82%
System 05-06
349
4,025
47%
48%
34%
36%
13%
14%
4%
5%
82%
83%
System 04-05
493
5,812
46%
47%
33%
34%
16%
17%
3%
4%
80%
81%
System 03-04
555
5,151
47%
48%
36%
38%
12%
13%
3%
3%
84%
85%
System 02-03
167
1,956
44%
47%
37%
39%
14%
15%
2%
2%
83%
84%
System 99-02
387
2,799
47%
50%
37%
39%
12%
13%
1%
1%
86%
87%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 86
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite D-4: Single-Subject Teachers in Grades 9-12
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Teach High School Students
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 64%
25%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 03-04 73%
Fresno 02-03 75%
27%
24%
36%
31%
21%
33%
35%
38%
42%
36%
33%
6%
21%
6%
21%
41%
20%
35%
39%
System 07-08 75%
38%
37%
41%
19%
19%
19%
36%
36%
19%
36%
21%
System 04-05 74%
38%
System 03-04 76%
39%
37%
System 02-03 75%
39%
36%
System 99-02 77%
40%
0%
22%
21%
37%
38%
System 05-06 72%
10%
39%
System 08-09 77%
System 06-07 77%
8%
28%
39%
System 10-11 73%
6%
23%
40%
36%
25%
50%
4%
3%
6%
6%
5%
6%
5%
7%
20%
19%
19%
37%
5%
6%
25%
38%
37%
9%
19%
46%
Fresno 99-02 76%
System 09-10 76%
Not-at-All Prepared
40%
32%
Fresno 06-07 69%
Fresno 04-05 72%
39%
24%
Fresno 07-08 68%
Fresno 05-06 61%
Somewhat Prepared
36%
Fresno 09-10 76%
Fresno 08-09 70%
Adequately Prepared
19%
75%
6%
5%
6%
4%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 87
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite D-4: Single-Subject Teachers in Grades 9-12
Assess Their CSU Preparation to Teach High School Students
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
45
49
754
810
23%
34%
27%
38%
37%
37%
41%
42%
25%
18%
29%
21%
8%
4%
10%
6%
62%
74%
66%
78%
Fresno 08-09
47
803
22%
26%
44%
48%
22%
26%
5%
7%
68%
72%
Fresno 07-08
64
1,055
30%
34%
35%
38%
24%
27%
5%
7%
67%
70%
Fresno 06-07
48
804
29%
33%
36%
40%
21%
25%
7%
9%
67%
71%
Fresno 05-06
36
637
19%
23%
38%
42%
26%
31%
9%
12%
59%
63%
Fresno 04-05
65
1,079
31%
34%
37%
41%
21%
24%
5%
7%
70%
73%
Fresno 03-04
47
797
32%
37%
36%
40%
20%
23%
5%
7%
71%
75%
Fresno 02-03
40
709
39%
44%
31%
35%
19%
23%
3%
5%
73%
77%
Fresno 99-02
45
582
35%
40%
36%
41%
19%
23%
2%
4%
74%
78%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
357
477
5,702
7,443
35%
40%
37%
41%
37%
34%
38%
36%
20%
18%
21%
19%
6%
5%
7%
6%
73%
75%
74%
76%
System 08-09
563
9,503
37%
38%
38%
39%
18%
19%
4%
5%
76%
77%
System 07-08
743
12,890
38%
39%
36%
37%
19%
20%
6%
6%
75%
76%
System 06-07
785
13,493
40%
41%
36%
37%
18%
19%
4%
5%
76%
77%
System 05-06
568
10,543
36%
37%
35%
36%
21%
22%
6%
7%
72%
73%
System 04-05
794
14,156
37%
38%
36%
37%
20%
21%
5%
6%
74%
74%
System 03-04
881
16,173
39%
40%
36%
37%
19%
19%
5%
5%
75%
76%
System 02-03
630
11,802
38%
40%
36%
37%
18%
19%
5%
6%
75%
76%
System 99-02
883
11,068
40%
41%
37%
38%
18%
19%
4%
4%
77%
78%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 88
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Longitudinal Supervisor Composite D-5.1: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Teach English Learners (K-12)
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 76%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 99-02 79%
System 10-11 81%
System 09-10 83%
System 08-09 79%
System 07-08 83%
System 06-07 81%
System 05-06 80%
System 04-05 80%
23%
42%
3%
19%
45%
36%
21%
42%
15%
40%
44%
17%
39%
45%
43%
3%
2%
18%
38%
41%
2%
15%
37%
43%
2%
20%
40%
42%
4%
3%
42%
41%
2%
4%
16%
36%
39%
2%
20%
47%
40%
3%
17%
40%
29%
5%
17%
39%
38%
Fresno 02-03 84%
38%
36%
Fresno 06-07 78%
Fresno 03-04 76%
20%
43%
39%
Fresno 04-05 81%
Not-at-All Prepared
40%
Fresno 07-08 81%
Fresno 05-06 76%
Somewhat Prepared
36%
Fresno 09-10 81%
Fresno 08-09 75%
Adequately Prepared
15%
2%
3%
38%
17%
3%
39%
16%
3%
16%
3%
37%
System 03-04 80%
41%
39%
17%
3%
System 02-03 80%
40%
40%
17%
3%
System 99-02 82%
41%
0%
41%
25%
50%
16%
75%
2%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 89
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Longitudinal Supervisor Composite D-5.1: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Teach English Learners (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
64
78
668
812
34%
41%
38%
44%
38%
36%
41%
39%
18%
16%
21%
18%
4%
2%
5%
3%
74%
79%
77%
82%
Fresno 08-09
80
909
34%
37%
37%
40%
22%
24%
2%
3%
73%
76%
Fresno 07-08
163
1,984
38%
40%
41%
43%
16%
18%
2%
2%
80%
82%
Fresno 06-07
93
1,085
37%
39%
38%
41%
19%
21%
2%
3%
76%
79%
Fresno 05-06
47
570
28%
31%
45%
49%
18%
21%
3%
4%
75%
78%
Fresno 04-05
89
1,082
43%
46%
35%
37%
15%
17%
3%
4%
80%
82%
Fresno 03-04
168
1,492
39%
42%
35%
37%
20%
22%
2%
3%
75%
77%
Fresno 02-03
41
501
40%
44%
40%
44%
13%
16%
1%
2%
82%
85%
Fresno 99-02
197
1,774
38%
40%
39%
41%
19%
21%
1%
2%
78%
79%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
533
543
5,640
5,927
40%
44%
41%
45%
39%
38%
41%
39%
16%
14%
17%
15%
2%
2%
3%
3%
80%
82%
81%
83%
System 08-09
854
9,347
42%
43%
37%
37%
18%
19%
2%
3%
79%
80%
System 07-08
1,676
19,100
44%
45%
37%
38%
15%
15%
2%
3%
82%
83%
System 06-07
1,897
22,097
42%
43%
38%
38%
17%
17%
3%
3%
80%
81%
System 05-06
1,024
11,710
41%
42%
39%
40%
16%
17%
3%
3%
80%
81%
System 04-05
1,620
18,754
43%
44%
37%
37%
16%
17%
3%
3%
80%
81%
System 03-04
2,629
21,496
41%
42%
39%
39%
17%
17%
3%
3%
80%
81%
System 02-03
1,557
18,246
40%
41%
39%
40%
17%
17%
3%
3%
80%
80%
System 99-02
4,738
32,926
41%
41%
40%
41%
16%
16%
2%
2%
81%
82%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 90
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Longitudinal Teacher Composite D-5.1: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Teach English Learners (K-12)
Well Prepared
Somewhat Prepared
Fresno 10-11 75%
30%
45%
Fresno 09-10 73%
31%
42%
33%
Fresno 08-09 75%
Fresno 06-07 72%
Fresno 05-06 71%
Fresno 04-05 67%
Fresno 03-04 74%
Fresno 02-03 75%
20%
21%
39%
31%
41%
29%
42%
26%
41%
31%
34%
38%
System 10-11 78%
38%
38%
40%
40%
System 08-09 78%
39%
System 07-08 77%
38%
System 06-07 76%
36%
System 05-06 75%
35%
21%
4%
20%
4%
24%
5%
24%
5%
7%
22%
41%
5%
22%
3%
20%
4%
18%
38%
18%
39%
39%
40%
40%
5%
6%
26%
43%
Fresno 99-02 76%
System 09-10 78%
Not-at-All Prepared
42%
36%
Fresno 07-08 75%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
4%
3%
18%
4%
19%
4%
20%
4%
20%
5%
System 04-05 76%
37%
39%
20%
4%
System 03-04 76%
37%
39%
19%
5%
System 02-03 77%
38%
System 99-02 75%
0%
39%
36%
19%
39%
25%
50%
21%
75%
4%
4%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 91
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Longitudinal Teacher Composite D-5.1: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Teach English Learners (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
94
77
1,337
1,039
29%
30%
31%
33%
44%
40%
46%
43%
19%
20%
21%
22%
4%
5%
6%
6%
74%
72%
76%
75%
Fresno 08-09
115
1,694
32%
34%
41%
44%
20%
22%
3%
4%
74%
76%
Fresno 07-08
180
2,670
35%
37%
38%
40%
20%
21%
4%
5%
74%
76%
Fresno 06-07
152
2,230
30%
31%
40%
42%
23%
25%
4%
5%
70%
72%
Fresno 05-06
94
1,440
27%
30%
41%
44%
23%
25%
4%
6%
70%
72%
Fresno 04-05
185
2,805
26%
27%
40%
42%
25%
26%
7%
7%
67%
68%
Fresno 03-04
131
1,988
30%
32%
42%
44%
21%
23%
4%
5%
73%
74%
Fresno 02-03
102
1,563
33%
35%
40%
42%
21%
23%
3%
3%
74%
76%
Fresno 99-02
269
2,486
37%
39%
37%
39%
19%
21%
4%
4%
75%
77%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
762
875
10,521
12,058
37%
40%
38%
41%
40%
38%
41%
39%
17%
17%
18%
18%
4%
3%
4%
4%
78%
78%
79%
79%
System 08-09
1,204
17,150
39%
39%
39%
40%
17%
18%
4%
4%
78%
79%
System 07-08
2,122
30,871
37%
38%
39%
40%
19%
19%
4%
4%
77%
77%
System 06-07
2,879
43,006
36%
36%
40%
40%
20%
20%
4%
4%
76%
76%
System 05-06
1,752
25,830
35%
36%
39%
40%
20%
20%
5%
5%
75%
75%
System 04-05
2,686
40,630
37%
37%
38%
39%
20%
20%
4%
4%
75%
76%
System 03-04
2,996
45,034
37%
38%
38%
39%
19%
19%
5%
5%
76%
76%
System 02-03
2,431
36,975
38%
38%
38%
39%
19%
20%
4%
4%
76%
77%
System 99-02
5,324
51,870
36%
36%
39%
39%
20%
21%
4%
5%
75%
75%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 92
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Focused Supervisor Composite D-5.2: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Teach English Learners (K-12)
Well Prepared
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 10-11 75%
Adequately Prepared
Somewhat Prepared
33%
Fresno 09-10 77%
36%
System 10-11 77%
36%
42%
21%
41%
5%
20%
41%
39%
System 09-10 80%
Not-at-All Prepared
4%
20%
41%
3%
18%
3%
Focused Teacher Composite D-5.2: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Teach English Learners (K-12)
Fresno 10-11 71%
Fresno 09-10 71%
System 10-11 74%
System 09-10 76%
0%
28%
43%
31%
24%
40%
35%
22%
39%
38%
50%
7%
21%
38%
25%
5%
19%
75%
5%
4%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 93
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Focused Supervisor Composite D-5.2: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS-ES Teachers to Teach English Learners (K-12)
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
64
78
583
682
Well Prepared
Low
High
29%
33%
36%
39%
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
39%
38%
45%
44%
18%
17%
23%
22%
3%
3%
6%
5%
72%
74%
78%
79%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
533
4,620
34%
37%
40%
43%
19%
21%
3%
3%
76%
78%
System 09-10
543
4,878
38%
40%
40%
42%
17%
18%
3%
3%
79%
80%
Focused Teacher Composite D-5.2: First-Year MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Teach English Learners (K-12)
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
94
77
1,258
975
Well Prepared
Low
High
26%
29%
30%
34%
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
41%
37%
46%
42%
22%
20%
26%
24%
4%
5%
5%
8%
69%
69%
73%
74%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
762
875
9,699
11,072
Well Prepared
Low
High
35%
38%
36%
39%
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
38%
37%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
40%
39%
Page 94
20%
19%
21%
20%
5%
4%
5%
5%
74%
76%
75%
77%
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Supervisor Composite D-6: Special Education Supervisors Assess
CSU Level I Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Special Education
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
47%
Fresno 10-11 79%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 02-03 76%
38%
50%
30%
20%
33%
55%
System 10-11 85%
55%
System 08-09 82%
System 05-06 80%
7%
21%
3%
13%
34%
11%
32%
34%
45%
2%
3%
16%
31%
50%
0%
6%
30%
53%
System 07-08 84%
System 06-07 84%
22%
50%
0%
17%
52%
System 09-10 86%
1%
15%
27%
Fresno 99-02 77%
13%
14%
35%
49%
0%
19%
35%
44%
14%
21%
28%
51%
Fresno 04-05 86%
9%
35%
48%
Fresno 06-07 80%
4%
28%
51%
Fresno 07-08 86%
Fresno 03-04 79%
16%
29%
Fresno 08-09 86%
Not-at-All Prepared
32%
34%
Fresno 09-10 63%
Fresno 05-06 53%
Somewhat Prepared
35%
14%
2%
2%
14%
2%
14%
5%
System 04-05 84%
55%
29%
12%
4%
System 03-04 85%
55%
30%
11%
4%
System 02-03 84%
56%
28%
14%
System 99-02 83%
0%
49%
25%
34%
50%
14%
75%
2%
3%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 95
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Supervisor Composite D-6: Special Education Supervisors Assess
CSU Level I Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Special Education
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
22
8
263
125
44%
29%
50%
38%
29%
25%
35%
33%
14%
24%
19%
32%
3%
6%
6%
12%
77%
58%
82%
67%
Fresno 08-09
15
337
48%
54%
32%
38%
12%
16%
0%
0%
84%
88%
Fresno 07-08
29
484
46%
50%
36%
40%
11%
14%
1%
2%
84%
88%
Fresno 06-07
7
109
45%
55%
25%
34%
17%
25%
0%
0%
75%
83%
Fresno 05-06
8
150
16%
23%
29%
37%
25%
32%
16%
23%
48%
57%
Fresno 04-05
33
536
49%
53%
33%
37%
12%
15%
0%
1%
84%
88%
Fresno 03-04
27
261
40%
47%
32%
39%
12%
17%
5%
8%
76%
82%
Fresno 02-03
22
377
46%
52%
25%
30%
15%
19%
5%
8%
74%
79%
Fresno 99-02
24
305
52%
57%
20%
24%
18%
23%
2%
4%
74%
79%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
187
132
2,816
2,722
54%
51%
56%
53%
29%
33%
30%
34%
13%
10%
14%
11%
2%
3%
2%
4%
84%
85%
85%
86%
System 08-09
186
3,627
49%
51%
31%
33%
15%
17%
2%
3%
81%
82%
System 07-08
322
6,228
52%
53%
31%
32%
14%
15%
2%
2%
83%
84%
System 06-07
265
5,028
49%
51%
33%
35%
14%
15%
2%
2%
83%
84%
System 05-06
188
3,552
44%
46%
34%
36%
14%
15%
5%
6%
80%
81%
System 04-05
304
6,023
55%
56%
28%
30%
12%
13%
3%
4%
84%
85%
System 03-04
452
6,410
55%
56%
30%
31%
10%
11%
3%
4%
85%
86%
System 02-03
237
4,617
55%
56%
28%
29%
13%
14%
2%
3%
83%
84%
System 99-02
733
5,329
49%
50%
33%
34%
14%
15%
2%
3%
83%
84%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 96
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite D-6: Education Specialists Assess Their CSU
Level I Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Special Education
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 74%
31%
Fresno 07-08 75%
31%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 04-05 75%
38%
36%
23%
42%
3%
12%
21%
42%
18%
44%
40%
3%
5%
18%
37%
18%
47%
System 09-10 79%
4%
15%
36%
37%
5%
14%
37%
41%
6%
24%
32%
38%
6%
19%
37%
Fresno 02-03 77%
6%
12%
44%
40%
System 10-11 77%
21%
40%
Fresno 03-04 82%
Fresno 99-02 81%
Not-at-All Prepared
38%
44%
Fresno 08-09 71%
Fresno 05-06 74%
Somewhat Prepared
36%
Fresno 09-10 82%
Fresno 06-07 73%
Adequately Prepared
32%
1%
6%
16%
5%
System 08-09 76%
39%
37%
19%
5%
System 07-08 76%
40%
36%
20%
5%
System 06-07 76%
39%
37%
19%
5%
System 05-06 77%
System 04-05 79%
System 03-04 80%
System 02-03 77%
System 99-02 76%
0%
41%
36%
43%
18%
36%
47%
17%
33%
42%
35%
41%
35%
25%
50%
4%
3%
16%
5%
18%
4%
19%
75%
5%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 97
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite D-6: Education Specialists Assess Their CSU
Level I Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Special Education
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
38
19
686
402
34%
41%
38%
47%
35%
35%
40%
41%
19%
10%
23%
14%
5%
5%
7%
7%
71%
80%
75%
84%
Fresno 08-09
26
811
29%
33%
38%
42%
21%
25%
5%
7%
69%
73%
Fresno 07-08
32
702
29%
33%
42%
46%
17%
21%
4%
6%
74%
77%
Fresno 06-07
17
369
33%
39%
34%
40%
21%
27%
2%
4%
70%
76%
Fresno 05-06
12
287
39%
46%
29%
35%
12%
16%
9%
14%
71%
77%
Fresno 04-05
46
925
36%
40%
35%
39%
20%
23%
3%
5%
73%
77%
Fresno 03-04
21
602
38%
43%
40%
45%
13%
16%
2%
3%
81%
85%
Fresno 02-03
26
622
39%
44%
34%
38%
16%
20%
4%
6%
75%
79%
Fresno 99-02
27
262
34%
40%
41%
47%
16%
20%
0%
2%
78%
83%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
327
219
7,054
6,057
39%
46%
40%
47%
36%
32%
38%
33%
17%
16%
18%
17%
6%
4%
6%
5%
76%
78%
77%
80%
System 08-09
234
7,404
38%
40%
37%
38%
18%
19%
5%
6%
75%
77%
System 07-08
446
12,617
39%
40%
35%
36%
19%
20%
4%
5%
75%
76%
System 06-07
458
12,895
39%
40%
36%
37%
18%
19%
5%
5%
76%
77%
System 05-06
339
9,750
40%
42%
36%
37%
18%
19%
4%
5%
77%
78%
System 04-05
522
15,071
43%
44%
36%
37%
17%
18%
3%
3%
79%
80%
System 03-04
538
16,530
46%
47%
33%
33%
15%
16%
4%
5%
79%
80%
System 02-03
477
13,588
42%
43%
35%
36%
18%
18%
4%
5%
77%
78%
System 99-02
1,133
10,326
41%
42%
35%
36%
18%
19%
5%
5%
76%
77%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 98
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Longitudinal Supervisor Composite D-7.1: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS Teachers to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 77%
37%
Fresno 09-10 80%
36%
Fresno 08-09 72%
35%
Fresno 07-08 77%
35%
Fresno 06-07 74%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 05-06 78%
Not-at-All Prepared
18%
44%
37%
26%
42%
31%
39%
3%
2%
24%
19%
36%
38%
2%
18%
40%
4%
3%
2%
22%
43%
33%
2%
20%
47%
Fresno 03-04 75%
5%
18%
41%
39%
Fresno 99-02 76%
Somewhat Prepared
40%
33%
Fresno 04-05 79%
Fresno 02-03 81%
Adequately Prepared
16%
43%
3%
22%
System 10-11 78%
38%
System 09-10 81%
39%
System 08-09 78%
39%
System 07-08 80%
40%
System 06-07 78%
39%
39%
19%
3%
System 05-06 79%
39%
40%
18%
3%
System 04-05 78%
40%
38%
System 03-04 78%
39%
39%
System 02-03 77%
System 99-02 79%
0%
40%
19%
2%
42%
17%
39%
17%
18%
41%
38%
41%
25%
50%
2%
20%
40%
36%
3%
2%
3%
4%
18%
3%
19%
3%
18%
75%
2%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 99
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Longitudinal Supervisor Composite D-7.1: School Supervisors Assess
CSU Preparation of MS-SS Teachers to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
83
103
615
763
35%
35%
39%
38%
38%
42%
42%
46%
17%
16%
20%
19%
4%
2%
6%
2%
75%
79%
78%
82%
Fresno 08-09
93
730
33%
37%
35%
39%
24%
27%
2%
3%
70%
73%
Fresno 07-08
200
1,629
34%
36%
41%
44%
19%
21%
2%
3%
76%
78%
Fresno 06-07
125
986
32%
34%
39%
42%
23%
25%
2%
3%
72%
75%
Fresno 05-06
59
460
29%
33%
45%
50%
16%
20%
3%
5%
76%
80%
Fresno 04-05
150
1,198
37%
40%
38%
41%
18%
20%
2%
3%
77%
79%
Fresno 03-04
220
1,322
38%
40%
35%
37%
21%
23%
2%
3%
74%
76%
Fresno 02-03
102
810
36%
40%
41%
44%
15%
18%
2%
4%
79%
82%
Fresno 99-02
244
1,587
32%
34%
42%
44%
21%
23%
2%
2%
75%
77%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
671
623
4,867
4,547
38%
38%
39%
40%
39%
41%
40%
42%
19%
17%
20%
18%
3%
2%
3%
3%
77%
80%
78%
81%
System 08-09
937
6,947
39%
40%
38%
39%
19%
20%
2%
2%
77%
78%
System 07-08
1,869
14,402
40%
41%
39%
40%
17%
17%
3%
3%
80%
80%
System 06-07
2,245
17,617
38%
39%
39%
39%
19%
20%
3%
3%
77%
78%
System 05-06
1,183
8,995
38%
39%
39%
40%
18%
19%
3%
3%
78%
79%
System 04-05
1,912
14,662
40%
41%
37%
38%
18%
19%
3%
4%
78%
78%
System 03-04
3,093
16,975
39%
40%
39%
39%
18%
19%
3%
3%
78%
79%
System 02-03
1,855
14,603
36%
36%
41%
42%
19%
19%
3%
4%
77%
78%
System 99-02
4,602
26,200
38%
39%
41%
41%
18%
19%
2%
3%
79%
80%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 100
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Longitudinal Teacher Composite D-7.1: First-Year MS-SS Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools
Well Prepared
Somewhat Prepared
Fresno 10-11 74%
33%
41%
Fresno 09-10 73%
33%
40%
Fresno 08-09 73%
33%
40%
36%
Fresno 07-08 75%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Adequately Prepared
21%
21%
23%
39%
Fresno 06-07 65%
27%
38%
Fresno 05-06 67%
27%
40%
Fresno 04-05 65%
26%
Fresno 03-04 68%
Not-at-All Prepared
27%
Fresno 02-03 73%
34%
Fresno 99-02 71%
33%
7%
22%
38%
4%
8%
25%
39%
4%
7%
27%
38%
6%
7%
26%
39%
30%
21%
5%
24%
5%
5%
System 10-11 75%
37%
38%
20%
5%
System 09-10 74%
37%
37%
21%
5%
System 08-09 75%
36%
39%
20%
5%
System 07-08 73%
35%
System 06-07 70%
32%
System 05-06 69%
31%
38%
38%
32%
38%
System 03-04 70%
33%
37%
System 02-03 70%
33%
37%
0%
24%
38%
System 04-05 70%
System 99-02 70%
21%
32%
24%
23%
23%
38%
25%
50%
6%
6%
7%
6%
7%
23%
6%
24%
6%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 101
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Longitudinal Teacher Composite D-7.1: First-Year MS-SS Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
139
117
1,431
1,167
31%
32%
34%
35%
40%
38%
42%
41%
20%
20%
22%
22%
4%
5%
6%
7%
72%
72%
75%
75%
Fresno 08-09
153
1,641
31%
34%
39%
42%
22%
24%
4%
5%
72%
74%
Fresno 07-08
213
2,390
35%
37%
38%
40%
20%
21%
4%
5%
74%
76%
Fresno 06-07
176
2,068
26%
28%
37%
39%
26%
28%
6%
8%
64%
67%
Fresno 05-06
112
1,306
25%
28%
39%
42%
25%
28%
6%
8%
65%
68%
Fresno 04-05
233
2,659
25%
27%
38%
40%
26%
28%
7%
8%
64%
66%
Fresno 03-04
147
1,848
29%
31%
37%
39%
24%
26%
6%
7%
67%
70%
Fresno 02-03
149
1,939
33%
35%
38%
40%
21%
23%
5%
6%
72%
74%
Fresno 99-02
308
1,712
32%
34%
37%
39%
23%
25%
5%
6%
70%
72%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,174
1,271
11,753
12,783
36%
36%
37%
37%
37%
36%
38%
37%
20%
21%
21%
21%
5%
5%
6%
6%
74%
73%
75%
74%
System 08-09
1,537
16,085
35%
36%
39%
40%
20%
20%
5%
5%
74%
75%
System 07-08
2,580
28,072
35%
35%
38%
38%
21%
21%
6%
6%
73%
73%
System 06-07
3,185
36,007
32%
33%
38%
38%
23%
24%
6%
6%
70%
71%
System 05-06
1,861
20,705
31%
32%
38%
39%
23%
24%
7%
7%
69%
70%
System 04-05
3,164
36,262
32%
33%
38%
38%
23%
24%
6%
6%
70%
71%
System 03-04
3,354
40,327
33%
33%
37%
38%
23%
23%
7%
7%
70%
71%
System 02-03
2,576
33,177
33%
33%
37%
38%
23%
24%
6%
6%
70%
71%
System 99-02
6,041
35,785
31%
32%
38%
39%
24%
24%
6%
6%
70%
70%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 102
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Focused Supervisor Composite D-7.2: School Supervisors Assess CSU
Preparation of MS-SS Teachers to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 76%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 09-10 78%
Adequately Prepared
Somewhat Prepared
35%
41%
30%
System 10-11 76%
35%
System 09-10 77%
35%
Not-at-All Prepared
19%
48%
5%
20%
41%
42%
2%
20%
3%
21%
3%
Focused Teacher Composite D-7.2: First-Year MS-SS Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools
Fresno 10-11 75%
36%
Fresno 09-10 71%
35%
36%
System 10-11 70%
34%
36%
22%
7%
System 09-10 70%
34%
36%
23%
7%
0%
39%
25%
50%
21%
23%
75%
4%
6%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 103
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Focused Supervisor Composite D-7.2: School Supervisors Assess CSU
Preparation of MS-SS Teachers to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
83
103
716
931
Well Prepared
Low
High
32%
27%
38%
32%
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
38%
45%
44%
50%
16%
18%
21%
22%
4%
1%
6%
3%
74%
75%
79%
80%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
671
4,962
34%
36%
40%
43%
19%
21%
3%
4%
76%
78%
System 09-10
623
5,399
34%
36%
41%
43%
20%
21%
2%
3%
76%
78%
Focused Teacher Composite D-7.2: First-Year MS-SS Teachers Assess
Their CSU Preparation to Teach Special Learners in Inclusive Schools
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
139
117
1,590
1,399
Well Prepared
Low
High
34%
33%
38%
37%
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
37%
34%
42%
38%
19%
21%
22%
24%
3%
5%
5%
7%
74%
69%
77%
73%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,174
1,271
12,949
14,762
Well Prepared
Low
High
34%
33%
35%
35%
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
36%
35%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
37%
36%
21%
23%
Page 104
23%
24%
7%
7%
8%
7%
70%
69%
71%
70%
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite E-1: MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess the Overall Value of CSU
Professional Coursework in Their First Year of Teaching
Well Prepared
Fresno 10-11 78%
Fresno 09-10 77%
Adequately Prepared
42%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Fresno 05-06 72%
38%
Fresno 04-05 75%
39%
Fresno 03-04 76%
40%
Fresno 02-03 78%
Fresno 99-02 74%
System 10-11 78%
18%
36%
44%
39%
18%
37%
46%
Fresno 06-07 76%
19%
34%
23%
36%
36%
43%
35%
38%
34%
33%
System 08-09 81%
45%
36%
System 07-08 80%
44%
System 06-07 79%
43%
System 05-06 77%
42%
System 04-05 78%
43%
System 03-04 77%
42%
System 02-03 79%
43%
35%
6%
50%
5%
6%
17%
4%
16%
5%
15%
4%
16%
4%
17%
4%
5%
35%
17%
5%
35%
17%
5%
16%
36%
25%
18%
18%
36%
40%
5%
5%
36%
36%
5%
20%
20%
44%
3%
5%
17%
36%
46%
0%
15%
37%
4%
5%
14%
36%
System 09-10 79%
System 99-02 76%
Not-at-All Prepared
36%
40%
Fresno 08-09 82%
Fresno 07-08 80%
Somewhat Prepared
19%
75%
5%
6%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 105
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite E-1: MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess the Overall Value of CSU
Professional Coursework in Their First Year of Teaching
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
143
126
2,168
1,855
41%
39%
43%
42%
35%
36%
37%
38%
17%
16%
19%
19%
4%
4%
5%
6%
77%
76%
79%
79%
Fresno 08-09
165
2,710
45%
48%
35%
37%
13%
15%
3%
4%
81%
83%
Fresno 07-08
223
3,735
43%
46%
35%
37%
14%
15%
4%
5%
80%
82%
Fresno 06-07
181
3,185
38%
40%
35%
38%
18%
20%
5%
6%
75%
77%
Fresno 05-06
115
1,989
37%
40%
33%
35%
22%
24%
4%
6%
71%
74%
Fresno 04-05
248
4,265
38%
39%
35%
37%
19%
21%
5%
6%
74%
76%
Fresno 03-04
156
2,912
39%
42%
35%
37%
17%
19%
5%
7%
75%
77%
Fresno 02-03
157
2,657
42%
44%
34%
36%
16%
18%
4%
5%
77%
79%
Fresno 99-02
316
2,186
37%
39%
34%
37%
19%
21%
5%
6%
73%
75%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,254
1,420
18,250
20,875
44%
45%
45%
46%
34%
33%
35%
34%
17%
16%
17%
16%
4%
5%
4%
5%
78%
79%
79%
79%
System 08-09
1,691
26,984
45%
46%
36%
36%
14%
15%
4%
4%
81%
82%
System 07-08
2,896
46,802
44%
45%
36%
36%
15%
16%
4%
4%
80%
80%
System 06-07
3,524
59,056
43%
43%
35%
36%
16%
17%
4%
5%
79%
79%
System 05-06
2,091
33,832
41%
42%
35%
35%
18%
18%
5%
6%
76%
77%
System 04-05
3,487
60,122
42%
43%
35%
35%
17%
18%
5%
5%
78%
78%
System 03-04
3,690
65,880
42%
43%
35%
36%
17%
17%
5%
5%
77%
78%
System 02-03
2,836
46,983
43%
43%
35%
36%
16%
17%
5%
5%
78%
79%
System 99-02
6,219
45,778
39%
40%
35%
36%
19%
19%
6%
6%
75%
75%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 106
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals
Teacher Composite E-2: MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess the Overall Value of CSU
Credential Program Fieldwork in Their First Year of Teaching
Well Prepared
Adequately Prepared
Not-at-All Prepared
Fresno 10-11 80%
55%
25%
16%
4%
Fresno 09-10 80%
56%
24%
16%
4%
64%
Fresno 08-09 85%
23%
59%
Fresno 06-07 83%
Fresno 05-06 80%
21%
61%
Fresno 07-08 84%
Where and When Teachers Were Prepared
Somewhat Prepared
24%
53%
12%
10%
12%
27%
14%
3%
5%
6%
6%
Fresno 04-05 82%
59%
23%
13%
6%
Fresno 03-04 81%
58%
23%
13%
6%
Fresno 02-03 81%
58%
Fresno 99-02 84%
58%
23%
26%
64%
System 10-11 85%
System 09-10 84%
63%
System 08-09 85%
63%
13%
21%
21%
22%
5%
11%
4%
11%
4%
12%
11%
5%
4%
System 07-08 84%
61%
23%
12%
5%
System 06-07 84%
60%
24%
11%
5%
System 05-06 81%
57%
24%
13%
6%
System 04-05 82%
59%
23%
12%
6%
System 03-04 81%
59%
22%
13%
6%
System 02-03 82%
59%
23%
12%
6%
13%
6%
System 99-02 81%
0%
56%
25%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Percentages of Teaching Graduates Whose CSU Preparation Was Assessed One Year After It was Completed
File Set 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 107
See File 6-A for the Contents of All Composites
Teacher Composite E-2: MS-SS-ES Teachers Assess the Overall Value of CSU
Credential Program Fieldwork in Their First Year of Teaching
The following table shows the lowest and highest percentages that would occur in the graph with the same title if the CSU surveyed the population
100 times instead of once. To use a graph’s results in academic decisions, the low-high percentages below should differ by nine or fewer points.
(A) This Campus: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
Fresno 10-11
Fresno 09-10
143
126
1,257
1,084
53%
55%
56%
58%
24%
22%
26%
25%
15%
15%
17%
17%
4%
3%
5%
5%
78%
79%
81%
82%
Fresno 08-09
165
1,572
62%
65%
20%
23%
11%
13%
2%
3%
84%
86%
Fresno 07-08
223
2,152
60%
62%
22%
24%
10%
11%
5%
6%
83%
85%
Fresno 06-07
181
1,763
57%
60%
23%
25%
11%
13%
5%
6%
81%
83%
Fresno 05-06
115
1,138
51%
55%
25%
28%
13%
15%
5%
7%
78%
81%
Fresno 04-05
248
2,418
58%
60%
22%
24%
12%
13%
5%
6%
81%
83%
Fresno 03-04
156
1,590
57%
60%
22%
24%
12%
14%
5%
6%
80%
82%
Fresno 02-03
157
1,496
57%
60%
22%
24%
12%
14%
5%
6%
80%
83%
Fresno 99-02
316
1,254
57%
60%
25%
28%
10%
12%
4%
5%
84%
86%
(B) CSU System: Ninety-Percent Confidence Intervals for Each Percentage Value in the Graph on the Facing Page
Well Prepared
Low
High
Adequately Prepared Somewhat Prepared Not-at-All Prepared Well+Adequately-Prepared
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Low
High
Cohort
Total No. of
Respondents
Total No. of
Judgments
System 10-11
System 09-10
1,254
1,420
10,558
11,781
63%
62%
64%
63%
21%
20%
21%
21%
10%
11%
11%
12%
4%
5%
4%
5%
85%
83%
85%
84%
System 08-09
1,691
15,830
62%
63%
21%
22%
11%
12%
4%
4%
84%
85%
System 07-08
2,896
26,956
60%
61%
22%
23%
12%
12%
5%
5%
83%
83%
System 06-07
3,524
33,739
60%
61%
23%
24%
11%
12%
4%
5%
84%
84%
System 05-06
2,091
20,051
56%
57%
24%
24%
13%
13%
6%
6%
80%
81%
System 04-05
3,487
33,890
59%
59%
23%
23%
12%
12%
6%
6%
82%
82%
System 03-04
3,690
36,296
59%
59%
22%
23%
12%
13%
6%
6%
81%
82%
System 02-03
2,836
26,166
59%
60%
22%
23%
12%
12%
6%
6%
82%
82%
System 99-02
6,219
26,661
56%
57%
24%
25%
13%
13%
6%
6%
81%
81%
File 1-A: Composite Results for All Credentials, Pathways and Programs
Page 108
File 7, Pages 2-3 Explain Your Confidence Intervals