Kogod Case Competition Scoresheet
Preliminary Round
Judge’s name:
________________________________________________ (please print)
Team name:
________________________________________________ (please print)
Directions: Using the scoring criteria below, circle whole numbers only (no split scores). Copy that number into the
box on the right. Lines left blank will be counted as a 1.
I. CRITICAL ISSUES. The team clearly and appropriately identified the critical issues raised by the case.
1
2
Strongly disagree
3
4
5
6
Average
7
8
9
10
Strongly agree
II. EVIDENCE. The team’s analysis showed excellent use of evidence, including supplemental research as
appropriate.
1
2
Strongly disagree
3
4
5
6
Average
7
8
9
10
Strongly agree
III. RECOMMENDATIONS. The recommendations clearly addressed the critical issues.
Recommendations were feasible, creative, and appropriate to the audience (in this case, the CEO).
1
2
Strongly disagree
3
4
5
6
Average
7
8
9
10
Strongly agree
IV. Q & A. Answers during the Q & A portion were clear, thoughtful, and relevant. More than one teammate
responded appropriately and with confidence.
1
2
Strongly disagree
3
4
5
6
Average
7
8
9
10
Strongly agree
V. DELIVERY. The team delivered the presentation persuasively and professionally; the team projected unity;
slides were attractive and easy to understand.
1
2
Strongly disagree
3
4
5
6
Average
7
8
9
10
Strongly agree
VI. OVERALL IMPRESSION. The team gave a credible, persuasive, and professional presentation.
1
2
Strongly disagree
3
4
5
6
Average
7
8
9
10
Strongly agree
Directions: Add the points in the boxes and write the total to the right.
(The highest possible score is 60; average score is 33; 6 is lowest possible score.)
COMMENTS: Please provide comments on the back so students can learn from your feedback. What worked well?
What could have been improved? (Your name will be removed before student competitors see this sheet.)
TOTAL SCORE: