ATI Instructional Materials Report AY 10/11

advertisement
ATI Instructional Materials Report AY 10/11
Campus Name:
Please refer to the report instructions before completing this form. The instructions were sent as a separate attachment and they are also posted on the ATI Moodle Website.
1.0
Timely Adoption
Goal
The campus has implemented a comprehensive
plan to ensure the timely adoption of textbooks
and other instructional materials.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 10/11
Not Started
 Video production with IM committee and Instructional
Initiated
Technology regarding accessibility, textbook affordability and
Defined
universal design shown at Fall Faculty Assembly and emailed
Established
to faculty.
Managed
 Reviewed eBook options.
Optimized
 Worked with HEOA committee to coordinate communication
about textbook orders.
Key Plans 11/12
Continue refining messaging from IM committee to campus.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
1.1 Campus has formally documented (e.g. Policy, Resolution
or Procedure) a process to ensure the timely adoption of
textbooks and other instructional materials.
[Commitment]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
1.2 Campus has developed capacity (e.g. established
practices, specified staff time, educational/training
resources, and/or technology) to achieve compliance with
timely adoption. [Ability]
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Yes
No
No
Comments
 Academic Policy Manual 3.37 requires on-time ordering of instructional
materials.
 The Kennel Bookstore accepts standing orders, reducing the number of late
textbook orders.
 A committee is examining HEOA requirements that will facilitate ordering
required by ATI.
For orders in Fall 2011, 45% were on time. As of November 8, 2011, Spring 2012 orders
were at the 60% level.
1
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
1.3 Campus has developed milestones or specific measures of
success for timely adoption compliance (e.g. percentage
of timely adoptions) and implemented a system to track
these measures. [Measurement]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Timely Adoption
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
2.0
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Assistance
Requested?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
No
Assistance
Offered?
(Yes/No)
Comments
The bookstore regularly reports the percentage of on time orders to the Provost’s
Leadership Team and IM Committee. Reports made prior to the adoption deadline allow
Deans to work with departments to encourage on-time adoption.
Comments
The IM Committee would like to collaborate with other campuses regarding faculty
communication and messaging strategies.
Yes
Identification of IM for Late-Hire Faculty
Goal
The campus has implemented a comprehensive
plan to ensure that textbooks have been
identified for courses with late-hire faculty.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 10/11
Not Started IM committee has identified structural benchmarks.
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Key Plans 11/12
The IM will meet with the Provost’s Leadership Team to discuss
methodology and strategies.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Comments
2
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
2.1 All academic units have implemented specific procedures
for late hire or adjunct faculty members for the timely
adoption of curricular materials. [Ability]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
2007
Indicator
Number
Assistance
Requested?
(Yes/No)
No
2.2 Campus has developed specific measures of success for
late-hire faculty (e.g. percentage of late-hire adoptions
completed by campus deadline) and implemented a
system to track these measures. [Measurement]
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Identification of IM
for Late-Hire Faculty
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
3.0
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
No
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Comments
No
Yes
The IM committee will develop strategies with bookstore staff.
Assistance
Offered?
(Yes/No)
No
The committee will develop an ad hoc committee of Chairs and Departmental Assistants
for the review of existing policies to create a dissemination plan designed for a March
2012 launch.
Comments
Early Identification of Students with Disabilities
Goal
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 10/11
Key Plans 11/12
3
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Goal
The campus has implemented a comprehensive
plan to ensure that students with disabilities
are identified and able to request alternate
media materials in a timely manner.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 10/11
Not Started  SSD staff presented outreach efforts to Fresno County, Sanger
Initiated
and Clovis school districts in collaboration with Outreach services.
Defined
 SSD has been focused on participation at all potential events, on
Established
and off campus, where our services and information can be
Managed
shared. This past year we have participated in: Dog Days, Preview
Optimized
Day, Safari, Veterans Welcome Event, Parents Association,
Accessibility Awareness Fair, Fresno City College, Disability
Awareness fairs at Fresno City College, COS and Reedley College,
Veterans Welcome event as well as classroom presentations.
 Services for Students with Disabilities (SSD) staff members
presented training to various groups on campus including Athletic
dept., multiple Student Affairs groups, and faculty by request
(Spec.Ed Counseling, Health, Rehab Counseling, Am Humanics,
Education, Social Work, Arts & Humanities and others on-on-one,
through SSD staff liaisons. Training included basic information on
services and how to do a referral to SSD.
 SSD Liaisons to Colleges continued to meet with all College Deans,
Asst. Deans, and Chairs. They are available as SSD resource for
academic staff.
 In 2010-2011, 185 new students established services with SSD,
bringing total active students to 581, our largest ever. An
additional 91 temporary students were served during this time.
 The Testing/Reading (Alt. Media) services role was split to support
a fulltime Alt Media Coordinator.
 Two additional student assistant staff members were added to
the Alternate media production team.
 Alternate media production work area was completed to
streamline the process and allow for more efficiency.
 2010-2011 - SSD received 791 requests for alternate format of
classroom materials. That is 33%more than the total requests
received for the 09-10 year.
Key Plans 11/12
 SSD will participate in similar events as noted in 10-11 on an
ongoing basis.
 SSD will actively participate in Student Affairs Strategic Plans for
Outreach, Diversity and Learning Outcomes.
 SSD will work with dean of Undergraduate Studies to identify
students participating in new Early Start summer program to
assure those needing alternate media and other accommodations
are served.
 SSD will continue to work closely with Outreach services and
directly with feeder school districts to provide information about
SSD services and process for applying for services.
 SSD will redesign website to be more user friendly for visitors
seeking services and how to apply.
 SSD will host workshops during DOSA Professional Development
days to assist staff members with information on awareness and
referral process when students are identified who may need SSD
services.
 SSD staff members will actively participate in diversity related
activities to promote understanding of those with ability/disability
and services offered on campus.
 Alt Media Coordinator is developing individual AM profiles for
students using alternate media materials, to support individual
needs and increase processing of requests.
 Alt Media Coordinator is working with SAM Data base
representatives to modify order / production tracking process to
streamline process and further reduce processing time.
Comments
4
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
3.1 Campus has implemented a system to provide early
registration for alternate media-eligible students. [Ability]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
9+
years
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
3.2 Campus has implemented a system to track early
registration usage by alternate media-eligible students
(intended to provide alternate media programs with
sufficient time to produce alternate media as well as to
document student conformance with alternate media
submissions procedures). [Measurement]
3.3 Campus has implemented a system that allows alternate
media requests to be submitted without appearing inperson during regular business hours (e.g. web-based
forms, integration with student registration portal).
[Ability]
3.4 Campus has implemented a system to track the
timeliness of alternate media requests. [Measurement]
3.5 Campus has developed specific measures of success for
early identification of students with disabilities (e.g.,
percentage of eligible students who utilize early
registration) and implemented a system to track these
measures. [Measurement]
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Comments
2008
Yes
Yes
All alternate media requests (books and other instructional material) are tracked using
SAM – Student Accommodation Management System. All data is date-stamped and
identified by status as it moves through the production process. Historical data is
available to measure the increase in timely production impacted by staffing and work
area changes noted above.
2008
Yes
yes
2011-2012 Goal: The committee will investigate the potential for a process that will
allow students to make alternative format requests and link to an accessible form during
the registration process through PeopleSoft. The SSD website currently includes online
forms to be copied and faxed if desired at www.csufresno.edu/ssd
Spring
2011
Yes
Yes
See 3.2 above. Requests are now tracked on SAM, and further reporting and setting of
new standards is a 2011-2012 goal.
2010
Yes
Yes
All Students who register with SSD office receive priority registration. SSD accepts
requests for alternate media immediately afterwards.
 New adjustments to SSD personal data base system are now being tracked. The
data showed that 69% of eligible students had registered by the second day of
registration for Spring 2012 classes (utilizing their priority registration). No
previous historical data is available.
 2011-2012 Goal: The committee will work with the Office of Institutional
Effectiveness to define measures of success, identify ways to track processes and
create a format for evaluating data.
5
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Early Identification of
Students with Disabilities
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff
4.0
Assistance
Requested?
(Yes/No)
No
Assistance
Offered?
(Yes/No)
No
Comments
Faculty Use of LMS (or non-LMS) Course Websites *
Goal
The campus has implemented policies and
procedures to promote the posting of all
required curricular and instructional resources
(including print-based and multimedia
materials) in a central, accessible electronic
location.
*While it is anticipated that most campuses will
use the LMS to meet this goal, other structures
(e.g. Web Content Management Systems or
other online delivery methods) that provide
similar functionality and are accessible, may
serve as appropriate equivalents to the LMS.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 10/11
Not Started
 Adopted a formal policy requiring all course syllabi to be
Initiated
available within the LMS.
Defined
 Developed an accessible syllabus template to be used for
Established
online and face to face courses.
Managed
 Hosted a syllabus redesign conference that focused on
Optimized
creating accessible course syllabi attended by 58 faculty.
 Instituted a teaching online program for faculty who are
developing online courses.
Key Plans 11/12
Continue faculty outreach and training, including Syllabus redesign
workshops.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Comments
6
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
4.1 Campus has formally documented (e.g., Policy, Resolution
2009
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
4.2
2010
Yes
No
We rely on the chancellor’s office evaluation of Bb for accessibility.
07/08
Yes
No
TILT trains and assists faculty in development and posting of online instructional
material.
07/08
Yes
No
When textbooks or instructional materials are formatted in-house by the SSD office,
textbooks and materials are emailed to students. If textbooks are requested from
publishers, FTP accounts are set up to download textbooks or publishers directly email to
the Alternate Media Coordinator.
Yes
No
Faculty members control access to their course materials and may request a review. If a
student is enrolled in SSD office and is accommodated with alternate media services, SSD
staff will request materials from student or faculty member to format and make
documents accessible.
4.3
4.4
4.5
Status
Not Started
or Procedure) a process to promote or require the posting Initiated
Defined
of IM to the campus LMS. [Commitment]
Established
Managed
Optimized
Campus has screened its LMS to determine whether it
Not Started
Initiated
conforms to Section 508 accessibility standards and
established a plan to address (or work-around) identified Defined
Established
gaps. [Ability]
Managed
Optimized
Campus has established specific guidelines and
Not Started
procedures for submitting course and curricular materials Initiated
Defined
hosted in campus LMS. [Commitment]
Established
Managed
Optimized
Campus has implemented procedures to accelerate the
Not Started
Initiated
delivery of alternate media materials to improve
Defined
timeliness (e.g. electronic delivery via campus LMS or
Established
FTP). [Ability]
Managed
Optimized
Campus has implemented mechanisms to provide
Not Started
Initiated
alternate media production staff with access to
Defined
instructional materials on LMS course sites for purposes
Established
of evaluating and converting materials. [Ability]
Managed
Optimized
Year
Started
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
No
Comments
7
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
4.6 Campus has established specific measures of success
(e.g., number of course sites with posted syllabi) for
faculty posting of curricular materials in the campus LMS.
[Measurement]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Faculty Use of LMS
(or non-LMS) Course Websites
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
5.0
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Assistance
Requested?
(Yes/No)
No
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
No
Assistance
Offered?
(Yes/No)
No
Comments
All courses have a shell. There is no way to determine what exactly has been uploaded
without actually going into the course which requires permission from the instructor.
Comments
Accessibility Requirements for Multimedia
Goal
The campus has implemented policies and
procedures to ensure that accessibility
requirements have been incorporated into the
adoption process for all multimedia-based
instructional resources.
Goal Status
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Key Accomplishments 10/11
ATI IM committee produced a video on universal design, tips on
making materials accessible and insights from a student with a vision
impairment experiences in a college setting.
Key Plans 11/12
Continue educating faculty on the importance of accessible
multimedia, while identifying alternate or innovative solutions to
accomplish the task.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Comments
8
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
5.1 Campus has developed and implemented accessibility
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
requirements for selecting and adopting multimedia
curricular materials (e.g. requirements for captions,
transcripts, audio description, accessible web players).
[Commitment]
5.2 Campus has established a strategic process, based on
available resources, for prioritizing the remediation of
inaccessible multimedia materials. [Commitment]
5.3 Campus has gathered survey information from media
libraries regarding multimedia usage and format types
(e.g. most frequently utilized titles and formats) to aid in
tool selection and prioritization decisions. [Measurement]
5.4 Campus has built capacity (e.g. established practices,
specified staff time, budget, tools, and/or work space)
necessary to address the accessibility of existing and
planned multimedia content and its delivery. [Ability]
5.5 Campus has established measures of success related to
multimedia accessibility (e.g. percent of new materials
that are accessible, percent of existing materials that
have been remediated). [Measurement]
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Accessibility
Requirements for Multimedia
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Indicator
Number
Year
Started
2009
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
No
Comments
No
No
Not started.
Yes
No
A list of the most frequently used titles and formats have been provided by the library.
Fewer than 14 of titles used more than 20 times per year still require captioning.
Yes
Yes
TILT has staff and procedures to assist faculty in making multimedia content accessible.
No
No
Assistance
Requested?
(Yes/No)
Assistance
Offered?
(Yes/No)
We strongly urge faculty to caption instructional videos that are uploaded to the campus
streaming services. TILT’s streaming media system uses an accessible player.
Comments
9
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Accessibility
Requirements for Multimedia
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
6.0
Assistance
Requested?
(Yes/No)
No
Assistance
Offered?
(Yes/No)
No
Comments
Accessibility Requirements for Curricular Review and Approval
Goal
The campus has implemented policies and
procedures to ensure that accessibility
requirements have been incorporated into
the curricular review process.
Goal Status
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Key Accomplishments 10/11
The IM Chair reviewed existing policies.
Key Plans 11/12
The IM Committee will consult with the Academic Senate Curriculum
Committee to develop policy ensuring accessibility requirement are
met in all courses.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
6.1 Accessibility requirements have been developed and
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
integrated into the academic curriculum review process
for new course adoptions and existing course reviews.
[Commitment]
6.2 Campus has established accessibility standards or
guidelines for selecting and authoring curricular
materials. [Commitment]
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Comments
2010
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
2010
Yes
No
The IM Committee will continue monitoring.
The committee will work with the University Curriculum Committee to define and
establish a process for reviewing accessibility requirements.
10
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
6.3 Campus has established specific measures of success
(e.g., number of courses that have undergone
accessibility review) for incorporating accessibility into
the curricular review and approval process.
[Measurement]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Accessibility
Requirements for Curricular Review and Approval
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
7.0
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Assistance
Requested?
(Yes/No)
No
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
No
Assistance
Offered?
(Yes/No)
No
Comments
Beginning in Fall 2010, all courses with a footnote 17 (denoting web-based) were
required to go through a course review process under APM 206 which included
accessibility review. In order to transition a course from face-to-face to fully online,
instructors need to go through entire process outlined in APM 206.
Comments
Supporting Faculty Creation of Accessible IM
Goal
The campus has implemented policies and
procedures to support faculty in selecting,
authoring, and delivering accessible
instructional materials.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 10/11
Not Started We have procedures and staff to support faculty in selecting,
Initiated
authoring, and delivering accessible instructional materials.
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Key Plans 11/12
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Comments
11
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
7.1 Campus has formally documented (through Policy,
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Resolution or Procedure) the nature of faculty
responsibility for selecting and authoring accessible
curricular materials. [Commitment]
7.2 Campus has established specific mechanisms to
encourage faculty authoring and adoption of accessible
instructional materials (e.g. recognition in article or letter
of appreciation). [Ability]
7.3 Campus has developed and disseminated examples of
accessible curricular materials and practices (e.g.
accessible syllabus template, faculty exemplars). [Ability]
7.4 Campus has specified technology (e.g. workstations,
software, scanners) and personnel resources (e.g. student
assistants, lab technicians) necessary to support faculty
creation of accessible instructional materials. [Ability]
7.5 Campus has implemented mechanisms to provide
content distributors with access to tools or practices that
allow accessibility testing of curricular materials (e.g. textto-speech, voice recognition, keyboard-only navigation,
Document Map view). [Ability]
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
No
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
TBD
Comments
No
Yes
TILT provides informal recognition in newsletters, and pays stipends to faculty who
redesign their syllabuses and courses.
Yes
Yes
Examples of accessible syllabi and instructional materials are posted in the Blackboard
Faculty Forum. Examples are also presented at the Syllabus Redesign Conference and
training sessions.
Yes
Yes
No
TBD
Not Started.
 The IM committee will work with departments to identify the location of
resources outside of TILT.
 TILT has a faculty resource lab staffed with student assistants who can assist
faculty with the creation of accessible materials using the lab resources.
12
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
7.6 Campus has established specific measures of success for
faculty creation of accessible instructional materials (e.g.
improving quality of course reader and/or e-reserve
material submissions). [Measurement]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Supporting Faculty
Creation of Accessible IM
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
8.0
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
No
Assistance
Requested?
(Yes/No)
No
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
TBD
Assistance
Offered?
(Yes/No)
No
Comments
Comments
Communication Process and Training Plan
Goal
The campus has implemented a broad-based
ATI awareness campaign, supported by a
comprehensive training infrastructure to
increase technological accessibility across the
campus.
Goal Status
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Key Accomplishments 10/11
Senate Chair has continued developing and implementing a
communication plan for ATI, universal design and textbook adoption
via email and video.
Key Plans 11/12
We will continue these efforts.
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Comments
13
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
8.1 Campus has developed a formal awareness campaign to
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
8.3 Campus has developed and disseminated a variety of
training materials, both in content and modality (e.g.
quick use guides, workshops, FAQ), for selecting,
authoring, and distributing accessible materials. [Ability]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
8.4 Campus has disseminated training materials for faculty
regarding methods to post curricular materials to the
campus LMS course site or equivalent (see Section 4).
[Ability]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
increase knowledge of accessibility issues and
responsibilities. [Commitment]
8.2 Campus has built capacity (e.g. specified staff time,
technology, and/or materials) in support of this
awareness campaign. [Ability]
8.5 Campus is tracking participation in training activities and
usage of training materials for accessible authoring,
conversion, and delivery of curricular materials (e.g.
number of workshop attendees, number of users who
download templates, or watch training videos).
[Measurement]
2008
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Comments
2008
Yes
Yes
 A sub-committee of the ATI was formed to prepare an accessibility plan that
included personnel and a formal budget. It was presented to the Cabinet in June
2011 and approved. 2011-2012 will show implementation of those goals.
 Due to budget reductions, there were no increased of staff last year, but existing
staff continued to accept responsibility for the awareness of accessibility.
 New staff members were added to the IM Committee.
 SSD upgraded assistive technology software in AT lab.
2008
Yes
Yes
 SSD provided training to the Student Affairs leadership team where many
student campus activities and communication originate: In 2011-2012, SSD will
provide additional training through “Alternate Media Lab Experience” events.
 IDs have put accessibility into faculty training classes, taught usability/universal
design, and the university had the accessibility training package from Atomic
Learning.
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
 Current work is done through the IM Committee.
 The President’s Committee on Disabilities worked on Accessible Communication
review including the redesign of the campus Accessibility website, University
Communication policies and campus main website reconstruction project.
Blackboard Training materials are on the website. In addition, there are specific
instructions for uploading an Accessible Syllabus.
 Usage is tracked for Atomic Learning tutorials. At this time, the number of
templates that are downloaded are not tracked. The IM committee is discussing
ways to consider authentication.
 TILT has been tracking faculty participation in TILT workshops.
14
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
8.6 Campus is tracking the effectiveness of training activities
and materials for accessible authoring, conversion, and
delivery of curricular materials. (e.g., user satisfaction
levels, decreased demand for alternate media
conversion). [Measurement]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Communication
Process and Training Plan
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
9.0
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
No
Assistance
Requested?
(Yes/No)
No
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
No
Assistance
Offered?
(Yes/No)
No
Comments
Comments
Process Indicators
Goal
Campus IMAP committee has sufficient
breadth, resources, and authority to effectively
implement a comprehensive IMAP initiative.
Goal Status Key Accomplishments 10/11
Not Started
 Reconstitute committee.
Initiated
 IM Committee has established a formal consultative and
Defined
collaborative relationship with the Office of the Provost and
Established
Administrative team.
Managed
Optimized
Key Plans 11/12
Comments
Success Indicator
Status
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Comments
15
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Success Indicator
Status
9.1 Campus IMAP committee membership consists of
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
stakeholders from all key units (Student Affairs, Academic
Senate, Curriculum Committee, Academic Technology,
Library) as well as faculty, staff and student.
[Commitment]
9.2 Campus IMAP committee has suitable authority to ensure
effectiveness of IMAP effort as well as to resolve issues
and challenges. [Ability]
9.3 Campus IMAP committee has established a system to
effectively track its task delegations and overall project
management. [Measurement]
9.4 Campus has established a formal administrative review
process by campus executive leadership for all IMAP
components. [Verification]
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Not Started
Initiated
Defined
Established
Managed
Optimized
Area(s) of Requested Collaboration for Process Indicators
Indicator
Number
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
Briefly describe the areas in which your campus would like to
collaborate with other campuses and the ATI staff.
9.3
Year
Started
Worked on
10/11?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Will work
on 11/12?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Comments
Yes
Yes
The ATI initiative is chaired by the Associate Provost.
Yes
Yes
IMAP team members will continue developing this structure.
No
No
Assistance
Requested?
(Yes/No)
Yes
Assistance
Offered?
(Yes/No)
No
The committee will identify and recruit stakeholders from all key units.
Comments
IM Committee would appreciate collaboration with other campuses regarding tracking
project management.
16
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Contributors
This information will be used for follow up questions and collaboration.
Name
Title
Michael Caldwell
Email Address
Phone Number
mcaldwell@csufresno.edu
559-278-7683
rnijmmeddin@csufresno.edu
559-278-2811
Susan Bartel
Chair, Academic Senate/Associate Professor
and Chair of Music
Reading Services/Alt. Media Coordinator:
Services for Students with Disabilities
Kennel Bookstore
susanb@csufresno.edu
559-278-4277
Ron Durham
Director, Kennel Bookstore
rdurham@csufresno.edu
559-278-4251
Otto Bendavides
Director, NASA Educator Resource Center
otto_benavides@csufresno.edu
559-278-0379
Patrick Newell
Library –Technical Services
pnewell@csufresno.edu
559-278-2786
Terry Garvin
Technology Innovations for Learning and Teaching
(TILT)
terryg@csufresno.edu
559-278-6826
Mary Bennett
Technology Innovations for Learning and Teaching
(TILT)
mbennett@csufresno.edu
559-278-6892
Scott Sailor
Professor
ssailor@csufresno.edu
559-278-2543
Rima Maldonado
17
ATI IM Report AY 10/11
Download