Whither Sol? Doug Rabin NASA Goddard Space Flight Center 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 1 Acknowledgment I thank all the researchers credited below—particularly Jeff Hall, who shared three slides from recent presentations by him and Wes Lockwood. None of the work is mine. 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 2 Relationship to Meeting Objectives Meeting asks: • Do small scale processes on the Sun give a reasonable explanation of solar spectral irradiance (SSI) variability? We ask a related question: • Can large scale processes on the Sun cause TSI and SSI variations over centuries or millennia ? 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 3 Q&A Question: How might the Sun change on timescales of 100-1000 years? Answer: We don’t know. Question: Why not? First answer: No one asked.* Second answer: The Sun is no RR Lyrae variable: its internal changes and variability on these timescales are likely small. The good news: We can now detect internal changes in the Sun and in stars very like the Sun. Multidecadal photometric observations are accumulating. Theory is catching up. * Not quite true …. 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 4 Stellar Variability: The Big Picture hydro exp ff 1/ G ~ 1 hr for the Sun GM 2 / R KH / L L ~ 107 yr for the Sun nuc f Mc 2 / L ~ 1010 yr for the Sun 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 5 Stellar Evolution: The Big Picture L R2 T4eff 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 6 Solar Evolution: The Big Picture Log L/L Log L/L HR Diagram + 9x10-11 L /yr Age (Gy) Teff (KK) + 5x10-11 R /yr R/R 4 19 September 2012 Age (Gy) Teff (KK) 5 − 3x10-8 K/yr Age (Gy) SORCE Science Meeting 7 How the solar irradiance has varied Figure 1. (a) Space-borne total solar irradiance (TSI) measurements are shown on “native” scales with offsets attributable to calibration errors. Instrument overlap allows corrections for offsets and the creation of a composite TSI record. (b) The average of three different reported composites [ACRIM, PMOD, and RMIB] adjusted to match the SORCE/TIM absolute scale. The grey shading indicates the standard deviation of the three composites. (c) Irradiance variations estimated from an empirical model that combines the two primary influences of facular brightening and sunspot darkening with their relative proportions determined via regression from direct observations made by SORCE/TIM. (d) The daily sunspot numbers indicate fluctuating levels of solar activity for the duration of the database. Kopp & Lean 2011 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 8 How the solar irradiance may have varied 0.1% This historical reconstruction of TSI is based on that of Wang, Lean, and Sheeley (ApJ, 625, 2005) using a flux transport model to simulate the Sun's magnetic flux, with those annual values provided courtesy of J. Lean. Kopp 2012 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 9 How the solar irradiance may have varied 0.1% Vieira, Solanki, Krivova & Usoskin 2011 19 September 2012 Reconstruction based on SATIRE models with open magnetic flux inferred from 14C in tree rings and various paleomagnetic models. SORCE Science Meeting 10 How the solar irradiance might vary Two black time series, based on various historical reconstructions (discussed by Lean et al. [2005]), bracket the estimated TSI variations as the Sun exited Maunder Minimum. Kopp & Lean 2011 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 11 How the solar radius may have varied Perhaps … Perhaps not … “… any variations of the size of the solar envelope must be within 2.5 km [3.4 mas] of amplitude over a solar cycle, a value in perfect agreement with those deduced from inversion of the f–modes in helioseismology, or from space observations through the MDI data analysis.” (Rozelot et al. 2006) Solar Disk Sextant (Sofia et al. 2012) 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 12 Large-scale Zonal Flows During the Solar Minimum -- Where Is Cycle 25? Frank Hill1, R. Howe2, R. Komm1, J. Christensen-Dalsgaard3, T. P. Larson4, J. Schou4, M. J. Thompson5 (1National Solar Obs., 2University of Birmingham, United Kingdom, 3Aarhus University, Denmark, 4Stanford University, 5High Altitude Observatory) Combined rotation-rate residuals at 0.99RSUN. Overlaid is the 5G contour of the unsigned magnetic field strength. Vertical lines indicate (1) the beginning of GONG observations, (2) the onset of widespread magnetic activity when the flows reach 20 degrees latitude, (3) the most recent observations, and the corresponding epochs one cycle later/earlier, as judged by the position of the flow belts below 40 degrees. Note the absence of the poleward branch for cycle 25, which should have appeared in approximately 2009. 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 13 Whither goes Cycle 24? A View from the Fe XIV Corona Richard C. Altrock (Air Force Research Laboratory) The previous three cycles had a strong, rapid "Rush to the Poles" in Fe XIV. Cycle 24 displays a delayed, weak, intermittent, and slow "Rush" that is mainly apparent in the northern hemisphere. If this Rush persists at its current rate, evidence from previous cycles indicates that solar maximum will occur in approximately early 2013. 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 14 The Solar-Stellar Connection in the Precision Stellar Astrophysics Era Marc Pinsonneault (Ohio State University) Parker Lecture (2011 AAS/SPD) • Kepler has so far detected Sun-like oscillations in ~1000 stars (Chaplin et al. 2011). • We can use helioseismic techniques to measure absolute abundances. • We can measure the depth of the convection zone (Van Saders & Pinsonneault 2011). • We can detect Sun-like differential rotation (Silva-Valio & Lanza 2011; Huber et al asto-ph/1002.4113) • But: the solar differential rotation pattern is not universal; the magnitude of latitudinal and radial DR depends on the balance of rotation and convection. • We can study the latitude distribution of starspots and even construct butterfly diagrams. • We can use precision age-rotation relationships to determine ages of field stars to <20% (Epstein & Pinsonneault 2011). My takeaway: We can now find “all but a DNA match” solar twins and study them to understand the range of behavior the Sun can potentially exhibit. 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 15 Ensemble Asteroseismology of Solar-Type Stars with the NASA Kepler Mission W. J. Chaplin, et al., Science 332, 213 (2011) Black lines show histograms of the observed distribution of masses (top) and radii (bottom) of the Kepler ensemble. In red, the predicted distributions from population synthesis modeling, after correction for the effects of detection bias. 19 September 2012 Estimates of the luminosities of the stars (in units of the solar luminosity) of the ensemble of Kepler stars showing detected solarlike oscillations, plotted as a function of effective temperature. SORCE Science Meeting 16 The radius and mass of the close solar twin 18 Scorpii derived from asteroseismology and interferometry M. Bazot et al., A&A 526, L4 (2011) The brightest solar twin is 18 Sco (HD 146233, HIP 79672; V = 5.5), whose mean atmospheric parameters are Teff = 5813 ± 21 K, log g = 4.45 ± 0.02 and [Fe/H] = 0.04 ± 0.01 (Takeda & Tajitsu 2009; Ramírez et al. 2009; Sousa et al. 2008; Meléndez & Ramírez 2007; Takeda et al. 2007; Meléndez et al. 2006; Valenti & Fischer 2005). Its rotation rate and magnetic field are also similar to solar ones (Petit et al. 2008). Its position in the H-R diagram indicates that the star should be slightly younger and more massive than the Sun (see Nascimento et al. 2009, and references therein). An average large frequency separation 134.4±0.3 μHz and angular and linear radiuses of 0.6759 ± 0.0062 mas and 1.010 ± 0.009 R were estimated. We used these values to derive the mass of the star, 1.02 ± 0.03 M. Precision stellar astrophysics! 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 17 S-index and R’HK b mag y mag S index S (F H FK ) ( FR FV ) RHK FHK 4 T eff ' R R RHK HK phot 19 September 2012 Vaughan, Preston & Wilson 1978 Noyes et al. 1984 SORCE Science Meeting 18 Spectral Irradiance Variation: 18 Sco vs. SORCE/SIM b b mag y y mag S S index 2000 Strömgren b y 2010 b, y, and S are positively correlated in 18 Sco, as we find for most solar age stars... Lockwood, Henry, Hall & Radick 2012 …but SIM suggests b and y should vary differently Haigh, Winning, Toumi & Harder 2010 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 19 A star emerging from a Maunder minimum? HD 140538 = ψSer ? Activity-Brightness variation. Filled: direct. Open: inverse. Radick et al., ApJS 118, 239 (1998) 19 September 2012 • Weak evidence of a transition from inverse to direct variation • No secular change in brightness detected at the 0.1% level J. Hall, Solar Twins & Stellar Maunder Minima (AAS 2012) SORCE Science Meeting 20 Could Fairborn photometric measurements detect the Sun’s variability? Yes, but only for about 30% of the comparison star pairs Cumulative distribution of comparison star + measurement noise y b ACRIM data degraded to 18 Sco window and precision 19 September 2012 Lockwood, Henry, Hall & Radick 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 21 Global Solar Structure on Short Timescales Comparison of the oblateness of isobaric surfaces calculated with YREC 2D using various assumptions about the internal profile of rotation (uniform rotation or solar-like differential rotation) and magnetic fields (dipole-or quadrupole-like latitudinal dependence). The calculated values of the oblateness, ε, reproduce well the value observed in the Sun. YREC 2D includes rotation, magnetic fields of arbitrary configuration, and turbulence, that can be run on very short time scales (down to 1 year), and that represents all global parameters (R, L, Teff) with a relative accuracy of 1 part per million, or better. Spada, Li, Sofia & Ventura 2012 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 22 Magnetic cycles in a convective dynamo simulation of a young solar-type star Brown et al., ApJ, 731, 69 (2011) 3 Ω 5 Ω • Solve the 3D MHD anelastic equations of motion in a rotating spherical shell. • Computational domain extends from 0.72 Rsun to 0.97 Rsun. • Oscillating dynamo behavior is possible even when the model does not include a tachocline. Field line tracings showing connections between equatorial regions and polar cap from previous cycle Magnetic wreaths achieved in (a) case D3 (Paper I) and (b) case D5 (this paper). Shown are time– latitude plots of mean toroidal (longitudinal) magnetic field Bφ at mid-convection zone, with scaling values indicated. Case D3 builds persistent, time-independent wreaths but the wreaths achieved in case D5 undergo quasi-regular reversals of polarity (three shown here, with roughly a 1500 day period). The dynamic range of the color bars is indicated. 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 23 Convective Babcock-Leighton Dynamo Models Reminder: Not the Sun! Miesch & Brown, ApJ, 746, L26 (2012) • Adds to the 3 Ω model of Brown et al. 2011 a poloidal source term in the magnetic induction equation (parameterized mean-field forcing) P ( Bs2 Ba2 ) ( Bs2 Ba2 ) (d) Mean toroidal field in the middle of the convection zone for a model with forcing parameter α0 = 100 m s-1. The color scale saturates at ±4 kG. (e) Zoomed-in portion of panel (d). 19 September 2012 where Bs and Ba are the symmetric and antisymmetric components of Bφ. The parity P, persistently negative for the Sun, varies in sign for this model. SORCE Science Meeting 24 So, wither Sol? On the one hand: • There is no strong evidence , from either observation or theory, that the Sun will exhibit secular variations > 0.2% in TSI, SSI, or global properties over 102−106 yr. On the other hand: • There’s no strong reason to believe it won’t. Place your bets! 19 September 2012 SORCE Science Meeting 25