SOURCE EXERCISE ON THE DEATH OF ALEXANDER III, 1286 Source exercise on the death of Alexander III, 1286 Source A: From The Wars of Scotland (Michael Brown, 2004) The situation was by no means hopeless (following the death of Prince Alexander in 1284)… Within days of his son’s death, the king obtained a promise from his magnates that they would accept the child, Margaret, Maid of Norway, as his heir. This was only an insurance policy. In October 1285 Alexander remarried, wedding Yolanda of Dreux, from a French noble family. He hoped that this match would pr oduce a child of his own to succeed him. It was his enthusiasm to return to his young queen that led the king to leave Edinburgh and cross the Forth on the evening of 19 March 1286. Setting out from Queensferry to the royal manor at Kinghorn, Alexander was thrown from his horse and died, his neck broken. How far does Source A demonstrate the problems caused by the death of Alexander III in 1286? Points to consider Begin by setting out the problems caused by the death referred to in the source. In fact, the source goes out of its way to suggest that there need not have been a problem in 1286. Do you fully accept this view? Was the Maid a suitable heir? Was she likely to win wide acceptance despite the magnates’ promise? Would the kingdom have been safe in the hands of a possible child born to Yolande? Who might have had other ideas of how to decide the succession in 1286? What was likely to happen if one of the great families of Scotland seized the throne for themselves? You should end your answer by concluding that the source demonstrates the problems caused by the death of Alexander III not at all/to a limited extent/to a certain extent/to a considerable extent/fully. WARS OF INDEPENDENCE (H, HISTORY) © Learning and Teaching Scotland 2009