ROAD SAFETY AUDIT
County Street at Hart Street
City of Taunton
January 30, 2015
Prepared For:
Massachusetts Department of Transportation
Prepared By:
Toole Design Group
33 Broad Street, 4th Floor
Boston, MA 02109
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Table of Contents
Background ................................................................................................................................. 1
Project Location Description ..................................................................................................... 2
Project Data ................................................................................................................................. 4
Audit Observations and Potential Enhancements ................................................................... 4
Summary of Road Safety Audit ............................................................................................... 10
List of Appendices
Appendix A.
Appendix B.
Appendix C.
RSA Meeting Agenda
RSA Audit Team Contact List
Detailed Crash Data
List of Figures
Figure 1.Locus Map ................................................................................................................................... 2
List of Tables
Table 1 - Participating Audit Team Members ........................................................................................... 1
Table 2 - Potential Safety Enhancements ................................................................................................ 11
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Background
The Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MassDOT) Highway Division Safety Section has
conducted a Road Safety Audit (RSA) for the intersection of County Street (Route 140) at Hart Street in
Taunton in support of the ongoing design project. An RSA is required to be performed during the design
process for any MassDOT related project that includes a high crash location in an effort to reduce the
number and severity of fatal and serious injury crashes across the State. The goal of the RSA is to identify
safety issues and provide potential enhancements to improve safety for all roadway users. Additionally,
the potential enhancements are categorized by timeframe and cost which helps responsible agencies to
determine if and when to make proposed implementations.
Toole Design Group (TDG) conducted an RSA on Thursday, December 4, 2014. The audit was held at
the Massachusetts DOT District 5 Headquarters building. Members of the audit team discussed safety
issues, conducted a site visit, and determined countermeasures during the audit on the infrastructure and
operating conditions of the subject intersection. The members of the audit team comprised of
representatives from local, regional, and state agencies ranging from emergency responders to
transportation planners and engineers. The members and their affiliations are provided in Table 1.
Contact information for the audit team members are provided in Appendix B.
Table 1 - Participating Audit Team Members
Audit Team Member
Agency/Affiliation
Cathal O’Brien
City of Taunton Department of Public Works Water Division Supervisor
Fred Cornaglia
City of Taunton Department of Public Works Commissioner
Tony Abreau
City of Taunton Department of Public Works Assistant Commissioner
Tim Bradshaw
City of Taunton Fire Chief
David Warish
City of Taunton Police Department Administrative Division Captain
Derek Feeney
City of Taunton Police Department Assistant Safety Officer
Lisa Schletzbaum
MassDOT Safety Section
Kevin Chiang
MassDOT Traffic Operations
Bill Travers
MassDOT District 5 Project Development
Rich Oliveira
MassDOT District 5 Projects
Edward Feeney
MassDOT District 5 Traffic Engineering
Brian Chapman
MassDOT Project Management
Sandra Serpa
MassDOT District 5
Lisa Estrela-Pedro
Southeast Regional Planning and Economic Development District
Jacqueline Schmidt
Southeast Regional Planning and Economic Development District
Joe Federico
BETA Group, Inc.
Tyler de Ruiter
BETA Group, Inc.
Jacqueline Carver
Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates
Alex Siu
Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates
Patrick Baxter
Toole Design Group
Shannon Brown
Toole Design Group
Page 1
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Project Location Description
The study area includes the intersection of County Street at Hart Street in Taunton, Massachusetts, as
shown in Figure 1. The intersection is classified as a high crash location based on the MassDOT Top
Crash Locations map and confirmed by the crash data for the period between 2009 and 2014.
County Street is classified by the MassDOT Bureau of Transportation Planning and Development as a
minor urban arterial. The roadway is state owned south of the subject intersection, while to the north it is
owned by the City of Taunton. According to the MassDOT Transportation Data Management System,
2000 traffic volumes on County Street north of the intersection were 18,600 vehicles per day. Hart Street
is classified as an urban collector. West of County Street, 2000 traffic volumes on Hart Street were 9,900
vehicles per day. There are no posted speed limit signs near the intersection.
The intersection is signalized with overhead mounted signals on all four approaches. Both the northbound
and southbound approaches on County Street provide two through lanes. The eastbound and westbound
approaches on Hart Street provide one exclusive right-turn lane and one through/left turn lane. The signal
phasing includes a leading left turn phase for the southbound approach and a lagging left turn phase for
the northbound approach. There are bus stops (flag stops) that service the 3 and 8 bus routes for the
Greater Attleboro Taunton Regional Transit Authority on all four approaches. The intersection provides
crosswalks and pedestrian push buttons with an actuated exclusive pedestrian phase. No bicycle facilities
are provided on County Street at the study area intersection.
A large casino resort development is being planned in the northeast quadrant of the Routes 24 & 140
interchange, approximately 1.2 miles southeast of the intersection. The development is predicted to
generate a significant amount of additional daily traffic through this intersection. City staff also noted
that the parcel on the southeast corner of the intersection is expected to be redeveloped within the next
year with a small commercial building.
Page 2
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Figure 1 - Aerial Map of County Street (Route 140) at Hart Street
Page 3
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Project Data
Audit team members received a meeting packet prior to the RSA including a meeting agenda (Appendix
A), study area details, and crash data details. The crash data details and collision diagrams, graphical
representation of the crash data, are provided in Appendix C. The audit members were asked to review
the packet and visit the RSA study area prior to the meeting. Safety issues were identified by the team at
the beginning of the RSA, followed by a field visit to the subject intersections. The audit team finished
the meeting by determining appropriate countermeasures for the safety issues discussed.
The crash data and collision diagrams were based on crashes that were reported by the Taunton Police
Department and occurred between January 2009 and July 2014. According to the data, approximately 117
crashes were reported at the intersection during the five year time period. Of those crashes, the majority
were angle crashes (43 percent – 51 crashes) and rear-end crashes (36 percent-42 crashes). The remaining
crashes included head-on crashes (8 percent – 9 crashes), sideswipe crashes (8 percent – 9 crashes), and
single vehicle crashes (5 percent-6 crashes). The most common cause for the crashes was “failure to yield
right of way” (33 percent – 39 crashes).
Audit Observations and Potential Enhancements
During the RSA, the audit team identified the safety issues and discussed potential safety enhancements
to address the issues. Several of the safety issues identified by the audit team were:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Intersection Geometry and Operations;
Traffic Congestion;
Intersection Sight Distance;
Pedestrian Access;
Traffic Signals and Phasing;
Bicycle Access ; and
Signage.
The following sections discuss in detail the safety issues and potential enhancements that were identified
during the RSA.
Page 4
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Safety Issue #1. Intersection Geometry
Observations:
The audit team noted that the most common
crash types were angle crashes and rear-end.
In addition, 28 of the 51 rear-end crashes at
the intersection included “followed too
closely” as a factor. Team members noted
during the field visit that vehicles typically
queue in only the right lane at the County
Street approaches even though two through
lanes are provided. Drivers may avoid using
the left lanes due to the chance of getting
“stuck” behind left turning vehicles during
the permissive left turn phase. This may
contribute to the 16 left turn; the pattern may Figure 2 - A northbound left turning vehicle
obstructs the southbound through travel lane.
also contribute to 2 sideswipe crashes as
drivers change lanes to bypass left turning vehicles.
Audit team members noted that the existing shared left-through lanes are typically operating as
defacto left-turn lanes. The negative offset between the opposing lanes results in stopped
vehicles on the opposing approach blocking the view of the moving through vehicles in the
adjacent right through lane. Furthermore, during the field visit, drivers were observed blocking
traffic in the left opposing through lane while waiting to turn. Both of these issues may
contribute to the pattern of angle crashes. Team members also noted that the merge distance on
County Street departing the intersection is very short, and may contribute to four sideswipe and
rear-end crashes.
Team members observed vehicles using the right-only turn lanes on Hart Street for through
movements rather than waiting behind left-turning vehicles. Team members noted that the Hart
Street through movements are confusing as the through-left turn lanes are aligned with the
opposite approach left-through lanes, requiring vehicles to shift to the right through the
intersection. Anecdotal observations indicate that confusion of the lane configuration could be
contributing to the six sideswipe crashes.
Potential Enhancements:
1. In the short term, consider restriping all four of the approaches to provide single lane
shared through/right and an exclusive left turn lane in each direction. Left turn lanes
should be lined up across the intersection to improve sight distance or provide positive
offset.
2. Evaluate potential for a roundabout. Team members noted that traffic analysis would be
required to determine if a single lane roundabout would operate acceptably.
Page 5
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Safety Issue #2. Congestion
Observations:
The audit team noted that heavy volume
during the morning and afternoon peak
hours causes long queues and driver
frustration. The long queues extending
past driveways may contribute to
“courtesy crashes” where a driver in the
queue allows a vehicle turning into or
out of a driveway to pass through,
resulting in a collision with a vehicle
going in an adjacent lane; the queues
also may block sight distance for
turning vehicles. This may contribute to
the 24 angle crashes reported at the
driveways on the intersection
approaches.
Figure 3 - Heavy traffic volumes result in long queues.
Audit team members noted during the field visit that vehicles making a through movement on
Hart Street westbound near the Dunkin’ Donuts driveway often must wait through multiple cycles
behind left-turning vehicles due to high traffic volumes and long queues. Audit members also
noted that yellow light “sneakers” and red light running is common at this intersection and
vehicles were observed going through the intersection after the light had changed red, which may
contribute to the 20 angle crashes within the intersection.
Audit team members noted that crash volumes were highest on Saturdays and during the month
of December. Anecdotal observations indicate that nearby shopping areas may contribute to the
high off-peak traffic volumes.
Potential Enhancements:
1. Adjust signal timing and phasing to reflect current traffic volumes.
2. Review clearance change intervals and adjust if necessary to reduce red light running.
3. Consider increasing police enforcement at the intersection to discourage red light
running.
4. As a long term measure, consider adding additional lanes to the intersection approaches
to improve capacity and reduce the queue lengths.
5. Ensure that any new driveways constructed in the vicinity of the intersection be placed as
far from the intersection as possible, and consider turn restrictions if necessary.
Page 6
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Safety Issue #3. Intersection Sight Distance
Observations:
Team members noted during the field
visit that sight distance is blocked by
private business signs along the
intersection approaches, including the
Dunkin Donuts driveway on Hart
Street, where sight distance is
partially obstructed by the adjacent
sign at 136 Hart Street. Of the crashes
reported, 20 involved vehicles pulling
into or out of driveways. The crash
data indicate that there was a drop in
crashes from 2012-2013 and
Figure 4 - A business sign blocks sight distance for
eastbound vehicles.
anecdotal observations indicate that
this may have been due to the CVS moving locations. Audit members indicated that drivers may
use the CVS driveway to make right turns from Hart Street eastbound to County Street
southbound and avoid the intersection.
Members of the audit team also noted that the large sign for the business on the northeast corner
of the intersection blocks sight distance for vehicles turning right on red from Hart Street
eastbound to County Street southbound, which may cause angle crashes if drivers are unable to
see to make a safe turn, although none were noted. Right turns on red on this approach may also
contribute to the five rear-end crashes on the County Street southbound if drivers are forced to
stop suddenly for a turning vehicle that did not see approaching traffic.
Potential Enhancements:
1. Move signs that block intersection sight distance.
2. Install a R10-11 NO TURN ON RED sign on the eastbound intersection approach.
3. Consider restricting the Hart Street Dunkin’ Donuts driveway to right in/right out.
4. Install R10-7(mod) DO NOT BLOCK DRIVEWAY signs at locations where queues
typically block commercial driveways.
Page 7
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Safety Issue #4. Pedestrian Access
Observations:
Audit team members noted that the existing traffic signal does
provide ADA accessible pedestrian signals and push buttons
but the ramps at all four corners of the intersection are not
ADA compliant. Additionally, team members noted that a
traffic signal control cabinet blocks more than half of the
sidewalk leading to the ramp on the southwest corner of the
intersection. This type of restricted pedestrian space is also not
ADA compliant. Team members noted that there was one
crash reported that involved a pedestrian. Anecdotal
observations indicated that impatient right-turning drivers are
not willing to wait for pedestrians to cross during the exclusive
pedestrian phase.
Potential Enhancements:
1. Install ADA compliant curb ramps at all four corners.
Figure 5 - A signal cabinet
blocks the sidewalk.
2. Conduct enforcement at this intersection for drivers who fail to yield to legally crossing
pedestrians.
Safety Issue #5. Signal Phasing
Observations:
Audit team members noted that 51 of the
crashes reported were angle crashes,
including 15 which involved vehicles
turning left from County Street. As
previously stated, the southbound approach
on County Street receives a leading
protected left arrow and the northbound
approach has a lagging left arrow.
Anecdotal observations indicated that this
may contribute to angle crashes at the
intersection. The northbound left-turn signal
may create the potential for a yellow-trap
condition due to the lagging phase, where a Figure 6 - The northbound left turn phase lags after
the southbound through phase.
southbound vehicle would assume that the
northbound signal turns red concurrent with the southbound signal. This may contribute to the
three reported crashes between southbound left turning vehicles and northbound through vehicles.
During the field visit, team members noted that left turning vehicles from the Hart Street
approaches tend to have to wait until the light turns yellow to make the turn, which may
Page 8
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
contribute to the one crash involving a westbound left turning vehicle and a northbound through
vehicle. This may also contribute to the six rear end crashes on the Hart Street approaches.
Potential Enhancements:
1. Install signs notifying of the lagging protected left turn on the southbound County Street
approach.
2. Restripe the intersection to provide exclusive left turn lanes on all four approaches, which
would allow for leading left turn phases on all approaches.
3. Install flashing yellow arrows in order to eliminate a yellow-trap situation if the signal
continues to provide a lagging left-turn phase. This would require restriping the roadway
to provide exclusive left turn lanes.
Safety Issue #6. Bicycle Access
Observations:
Audit team members noted that there is currently no pedestrian or bicycle master plan for the City
of Taunton. During the field visit, no bicyclists were observed traveling through the intersection,
and no crashes were reported involving bicyclists. Anecdotal observations noted that there is
little bicycle activity near the intersection, likely due to the perceived lack of safety, lack of
bicycle facilities, and high traffic volumes.
Potential Enhancements:
1. Consider including bike lanes as part of a comprehensive future project for the Hart
Street and/or County Street corridors.
Safety Issue #7. Signs
Observations:
Audit team members noted that there is a lack
of signage at the intersection. During the field
visit, W4-2 lane ends warning signs were
observed at the County Street approaches.
There is also a W2-1 advance intersection
warning sign at the southbound County Street
approach and a W3-3 signal warning sign on
the northbound County Street approach. Team
members noted that there are no lane use signs
provided on the approaches, which may lead
to sideswipe crashes if drivers make last
minute lane changes. The exclusive right turn
lanes on Hart Street are only designated by the
Figure 7 - State route guide sign is small and
pavement marking arrows, which may be
poorly located.
Page 9
Road Safety Audit—County Street at Hart Street – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
blocked by queued vehicles. Additionally, street name signs for the approaches are not visible at
the intersection which could lead to confusion for drivers who are unfamiliar with the area. Team
members also noted that the State Route guide sign on the westbound Hart Street approach is
small and may not be visible to drivers at the intersection. Confusion due to the lack of lane use
and street name signage may contribute to the six sideswipe crashes on the Hart Street
approaches.
Potential Enhancements:
1. Install R3-8 lane use signs to clarify lane usage and reduce the number of sideswipe
crashes.
2. Install a street name sign placard to supplement the W3-3 signal warning sign on the
County Street northbound approach. Replace the W2-1 advance intersection warning sign
with a W3-3 signal warning sign with a street name placard on the County Street
southbound approach.
3. Install mast arm mounted street name signs to improve visibility and reduce driver
confusion.
4. Install larger state route guide signs and review placement to improve visibility and
reduce driver confusion.
Summary of Road Safety Audit
Table 2 lists each safety issue and the corresponding potential safety enhancements that were discussed at
the audit and within the previous section. The safety issues and potential safety enhancements are divided
by location. For each observed safety issue and potential safety enhancement, the table includes the safety
payoff, estimated time frame for completion, estimated construction cost, and the responsible agency.
Safety payoff estimates are subjective and may be based on the relative percent of crashes that may be
reduced by the enhancement; for example, low (<30 percent), medium (31 percent to 70 percent), and
high (>71 percent). The time frame is categorized as short-term (<1 year), mid-term (1 to 3 years), or
long-term (>3 years). The costs are categorized as low (<$10,000), medium ($10,001 to $50,000), or high
(>$50,001).
Page 10
Road Safety Audit—Hart’s Four Corners – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Table 2 - Potential Safety Enhancements
Safety Issue
Intersection
Geometry
Congestion
Safety Enhancement
Safety Payoff
Time Frame
Cost
Responsible
Agency
Restripe all four approaches to provide a single shared
through/right and an exclusive left turn lane in each direction. If
roadway width allows, provide positive offset left turn lanes.
High
Short-term
Low
MassDOT/
Taunton
Evaluate the potential for a modern roundabout.
High
Short-term
Low
MassDOT/
Taunton
Adjust signal timing and phasing for current traffic volumes.
Medium
Short-term
Low
Taunton
Review clearance intervals and adjust as necessary.
Medium
Short-term
Low
Taunton
Consider increasing red light running enforcement
Medium
Short-term
Low
Taunton
Consider adding lanes to the intersection approaches to
improve capacity and safety.
Medium
Mid-term
High
MassDOT/
Taunton
Ensure that any proposed driveways are located as far from the
intersection as possible and consider turn restrictions.
Medium
Short-term
Low
Taunton
Move signs that block intersection sight distance
Medium
Short-term
Low
Property
Owners
Medium
Short-term
Medium
Taunton
Low
Short-term
Low
Taunton
Install R10-7(mod) DO NOT BLOCK DRIVEWAY signs at
commercial driveways
Low
Short-term
Low
Taunton
Install ADA compliant curb ramps at all four corners
Low
Short-term
Medium
Taunton
Relocate the signal cabinet to provide ADA compliant sidewalk.
Low
Long-term
Medium
Taunton
Conduct enforcement for drivers failing to yield to pedestrians
Low
Short-term
Low
Taunton
Medium
Short-term
Medium
Taunton
High
Short-term
Medium
MassDOT/
Taunton
Medium
Mid-term
Medium
Taunton
Restrict the Hart Street Dunkin’ Donuts driveway to right-in/rightIntersection
out.
Sight Distance
Install R10-11 NO TURN ON RED sign on the west leg.
Pedestrian
Access
Install signs on the southbound approach for the lagging
northbound left turn phase.
Restripe the intersection to provide exclusive left turn lanes on
all four approaches in order to allow for leading left turn phases
Signal Phasing
on all approaches.
Install flashing yellow arrows and exclusive left turn lanes in
order to eliminate a yellow-trap situation if the signal continues
to provide a lagging left turn phase.
Page 11
Road Safety Audit—Hart’s Four Corners – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Safety Issue
Safety Enhancement
Safety Payoff
Time Frame
Cost
Responsible
Agency
Bicycle Access
Consider including bike lanes as part of a comprehensive future
project for the Hart Street and/or County Street corridors.
Low
Long-term
Medium
MassDOT/
Taunton
Install lane use signs.
Low
Short-term
Low
MassDOT/
Taunton
Install a street name placard to supplement the W3-3 signal
warning sign on County Street northbound. Replace the W2-1
advance intersection warning sign on the southbound approach
with a W3-3 signal warning sign and street name placard.
Low
Short-term
Low
MassDOT/
Taunton
Install mast-arm mounted street name signs.
Low
Short-term
Low
Taunton
Install larger state route guide signs and review placement.
Low
Short-term
Low
MassDOT
Signs
Page 12
Road Safety Audit—Hart’s Four Corners – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Appendix A. RSA Meeting Agenda
Road Safety Audit
Taunton, MA
County Road (Route 140) at Hart Street
(Hart’s Four Corners)
Meeting Location: MassDOT District 5 Office
1000 County Street, Taunton, MA
Thursday, December 4th, 2014
1:00 PM – 3:00 PM
Type of meeting:
High Crash Location – Road Safety Audit
Attendees:
Invited Participants to Comprise a Multidisciplinary Team
Please bring:
Thoughts and Enthusiasm!!
1:00 PM
Welcome and Introductions
1:15 PM
Discussion of Safety Issues
 Crash history, Speed Regulations – provided in advance
 Existing Geometries and Conditions
2:00 PM
Site Visit
 Drive to Hart’s Four Corners
 As a group, identify areas for improvement
2:30 PM
Discussion of Potential Improvements
 Return to the MassDOT Office
 Discuss observations and finalize safety issue areas
 Discuss potential improvements and finalize recommendations
12:00 noon
Adjourn for the Day – but the RSA has not ended
Instructions for Participants:
 Before attending the RSA on December 4th, participants are encouraged to
drive/walk through the intersection and complete/consider elements on the RSA
Prompt List with a focus on safety.
 All participants will be actively involved in the process throughout. Participants
are encouraged to come with thoughts and ideas, but are reminded that the
synergy that develops and respect for others’ opinions are key elements to the
success of the overall RSA process.
 After the RSA meeting, participants will be asked to comment and respond to the
document materials to assure it is reflective of the RSA completed by the
multidisciplinary team.
Road Safety Audit—Hart’s Four Corners – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Appendix B. RSA Audit Team Contact List
Road Safety Audit—Hart’s Four Corners – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Audit Team Members Agency/Affiliation
Email Address
Cathal O’Brien
City of Taunton Department of Public Works
cobrien@taunton-ma.gov
Fred Cornaglia
City of Taunton Department of Public Works
fcornaglia@taunton-ma.gov
Tony Abreau
City of Taunton Department of Public Works
tabreau@taunton-ma.gov
Tim Bradshaw
City of Taunton Fire Chief
tbradshaw@tauntonfd.com
David Warish
City of Taunton Police Department
dwarfish@tauntonpd.com
Derek Feeney
City of Taunton Police Department
dfeeney@tauntonpd.com
Lisa Schletzbaum
MassDOT Safety Section
Lisa.schletzbaum@state.ma.us
Kevin Chiang
MassDOT Traffic Operations
Kevin.chiang@dot.state.ma.us
Bill Travers
MassDOT District 5 Project Development
Bill.travers@state.ma.us
Rich Oliveira
MassDOT District 5 Projects
Richard.oliveira@dot.state.ma.us
Edward Feeney
MassDOT District 5 Traffic Engineering
Edward.feeney@state.ma.us
Brian Chapman
MassDOT Project Management
Brian.chapman@state.ma.us
Sandra Serpa
MassDOT District 5
Sandra.serpa@dot.state.ma.us
Lisa Estrela-Pedro
Southeast Regional Planning and Economic
Development District
lestrela@srpedd.org
Jacqueline Schmidt
Southeast Regional Planning and Economic
Development District
jschmidt@srpedd.org
Joe Federico
BETA Group, Inc.
jfederico@beta-inc.com
Tyler de Ruiter
BETA Group, Inc.
tderuiter@beta-inc.com
Jacquelin Carver
Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates
jcarver@hshassoc.com
Alex Siu
Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates
asiu@hshassoc.com
Patrick Baxter
Toole Design Group
pbaxter@tooledesign.com
Shannon Brown
Toole Design Group
sbrown@tooledesign.com
Road Safety Audit—Hart’s Four Corners – Taunton, Massachusetts
Prepared by Toole Design Group
Appendix C. Detailed Crash Data
Hart Street/County Road Collision Diagram
SHEET 1 OF 5
71
CONT. ON SHEET 4
29
93
42
117
94
84
76
91
36
86
79
46 70
54 69
CONT. ON
SHEET 2
49 41
14 33
114
112
95
64
55 80
66 73
48
8
85
5
53
82 39
61
90
CONT. ON
SHEET 3
15 24
23
43
63
116
58
62 17
102
87
16 89
22
96
25
75
77 109
1
18
30
50
26 38
Key
Rear-End
Overturned
Head-on
Fixed-Object
Sideswipe
101
27
Parked Vehicle
Right Angle
I.D. Number
Left Turn
Pedestrian/Bicyclist
##
CONT. ON SHEET 5
110
68
Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc.
SHEET 2 OF 5
CONT. ON
SHEET 1
Hart Street/County Road Collision Diagram (West of Intersection)
35
40
51
Key
Rear-End
Overturned
Head-on
Fixed-Object
Sideswipe
Parked Vehicle
Right Angle
I.D. Number
Left Turn
Pedestrian/Bicyclist
##
Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc.
Hart Street/County Road Collision Diagram (East of Intersection)
SHEET 3 OF 5
34
78
67
44
9
21
57
115
47 74
12
52
45
60 48
83 81
99 98
111108
56 19
92
CONT. ON
SHEET 1
104
Key
Rear-End
Overturned
Head-on
Fixed-Object
Sideswipe
Parked Vehicle
Right Angle
I.D. Number
Left Turn
Pedestrian/Bicyclist
##
Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc.
Hart Street/County Road Collision Diagram (North of Intersection)
SHEET 4 OF 5
106
4
28
13
59
100
88
37
32
97
105
Key
Rear-End
Overturned
Head-on
Fixed-Object
Sideswipe
Parked Vehicle
Right Angle
I.D. Number
Left Turn
Pedestrian/Bicyclist
##
CONT. ON SHEET 1
Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc.
Hart Street/County Road Collision Diagram (South of Intersection)
SHEET 5 OF 5
CONT. ON SHEET 1
31
103
Key
113
Rear-End
Overturned
Head-on
Fixed-Object
Sideswipe
Parked Vehicle
Right Angle
I.D. Number
Left Turn
Pedestrian/Bicyclist
##
Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates, Inc.
CRASH DAY OF WEEK
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
11%
15%
10%
15%
14%
16%
20%
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
0%
CRASH MONTH
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
8%
5%
10%
8%
9%
10%
7%
8%
7%
9%
8%
12%
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
0%
CRASH TIME OF DAY
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
19%
30%
28%
18%
3%
3%
10PM‐2AM
2‐6AM
0%
6‐10 AM
10AM‐2PM
2‐6PM
6‐10PM
CRASH MANNER OF COLLISION
100%
80%
60%
44%
36%
40%
20%
8%
8%
5%
Sideswipe
Single Vehicle Crash
0%
Angle
Head on
Rear‐End
CRASH LIGHT CONDITION
100%
68%
80%
60%
28%
40%
20%
2%
2%
Dusk
Unknown
0%
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Daylight
CRASH WEATHER CONDITION
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
68%
17%
1%
Clear
Clear/Cloudy
Cloudy
6%
2%
2%
Rain
Snow
Unknown
4%
1%
Cloudy/ Sleet/ Cloudy/Rain
Hail/ Freezing
Rain
CRASH ROAD SURFACE
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
80%
15%
Dry
1%
1%
Sleet/Hail/Freezing
Rain
Snow
3%
Wet
Unknown
CRASH DRIVER AGES
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
17%
26%
15%
16%
14%
9%
3%
2%
70‐80
>80
0%
<20
20‐29
30‐39
40‐49
50‐59
60‐69
Harts Four Corners ‐ Crash Data Summary Table
No.
Crash Date
Crash Day
Time of Day
Manner of Collision
Light Condition
Weather Condition
Road Surface
1
2/6/2009
Friday
2:36 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Cloudy
Wet
Severity
Followed too closely
Veh1 failed to stop in traffic
Exceeded authorized speed limit
Lost control of vehicle and struck utility pole
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turning left in front of stopped traffic, Veh2 traveling to right side of stopped traffic struck by Veh1
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1
2*
3/30/2009
Monday
12:18 AM
3*
5/2/2009
Saturday
12:00 PM
Angle
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
4
5/15/2009
Friday
3:30 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Injury
5
7/8/2009
Wednesday
6:00 AM
Angle
Daylight
Cloudy/Rain
Wet
Injury
Clear
Dry
6*
8/15/2009
Saturday
3:03 AM
Angle
7*
8/28/2009
Friday
10:55 PM
Angle
8
9/1/2009
Tuesday
7:47 PM
Rear‐End
9
9/16/2009
Wednesday
4:46 PM
Angle
10*
10/3/2009
Saturday
5:23 PM
Angle
Rain
Wet
Clear
Dry
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Dusk
Clear
Dry
11*
10/4/2009
Sunday
5:44 PM
Head on
Daylight
Clear
Dry
12
10/9/2009
Friday
2:23 PM
Angle
Daylight
Cloudy/Rain
Wet
13
11/14/2009
Saturday
5:47 PM
Rear‐End
14
12/1/2009
Tuesday
8:27 PM
Angle
15
12/6/2009
Sunday
11:23 AM
Sideswipe, same direction
16
12/15/2009
Tuesday
2:17 PM
17
12/17/2009
Thursday
10:27 PM
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Rain
Wet
Clear
Dry
Daylight
Cloudy/Rain
Wet
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Head on
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Clear
Dry
18
1/7/2010
Thursday
7:39 AM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
19
1/25/2010
Monday
7:43 AM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
20*
2/8/2010
Monday
1:22 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
21
3/16/2010
Tuesday
5:36 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
22
4/24/2010
Saturday
1:22 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
23
5/10/2010
Monday
5:10 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
24
5/20/2010
Thursday
7:36 PM
Sideswipe, same direction
Daylight
Clear
Dry
25
5/29/2010
Saturday
1:46 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
26
6/6/2010
Sunday
1:58 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
27
6/7/2010
Monday
3:04 PM
Sideswipe, same direction
Daylight
Clear
Dry
28
7/26/2010
Monday
9:55 PM
Angle
Clear
Dry
29
10/9/2010
Saturday
6:41 PM
Rear‐End
30
10/28/2010
Thursday
12:43 PM
Rear‐End
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
N/A
Comments
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Single Vehicle Crash
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Driver Contributing Code Injury
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Injury
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Injury
Property Damage
Property Damage
Injury
Property Damage
Property Damage
Injury
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings/ Inattention
Made an improper turn/ Operating vehicle in reckless manner
No improper driving
Inattention/ Followed too closely
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings
Veh1 ran red light
Veh1 stopped in traffic, Veh3 turning left struck Veh2, Veh3 was pushed into Veh1
Veh2 slowed down after turning left and was struck from behind
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 was struck by another vehicle while turning
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings/ Made an improper turn
Veh1 turned left from far right lane under yellow signal indication striking Veh2 in intersection
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings
Veh1 quickly stopped after turning into traffic and was struck by Veh2
No improper driving
Veh2 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
No improper driving
Veh1 passed a left‐turning vehicle on the right and was struck by Veh2 traveling straight in a right‐turn only lane
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings/ Made an improper turn
Veh1 turned left under red signal indication striking Veh2
Inattention
Veh1 waiting to turn left was struck by Veh2
Visibility obstructed
Inattention
Veh1 turning left from driveway struck Veh2 in roadway, view
on right side blocked by bus
Veh1 struck Veh2 from behind at traffic signal, Veh2 was pushed into Veh3
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turning left from driveway struck Veh1 in traffic
Distracted
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings
Veh2 ran red light striking Veh1, Veh2 was pushed into Veh3
No improper driving
Veh1 stopped in traffic was sideswiped by Veh2 on left
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped at red light was struck from behind by Veh1
Followed too closely
Veh1 failed to stop at red light striking Veh2 from behind, Veh2 was pushed into Veh3
Unknown
Veh1 stopped in traffic struck by Veh2 passing on right
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Clear
Dry
Injury
Followed too closely/ Inattention
Veh2 and Veh3 stopped in traffic, Veh1 struck Veh2 from behind pushing Veh2 into Veh3
N/A
N/A
Property Damage
Followed too closely/ Inattention
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1
Harts Four Corners ‐ Crash Data Summary Table
No.
Crash Date
Crash Day
Time of Day
Manner of Collision
Light Condition
Weather Condition
Road Surface
Severity
Driver Contributing Code 31
11/5/2010
Friday
2:59 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
Injury
Followed too closely/ Inattention
32
11/8/2010
Monday
2:09 PM
Angle
Daylight
Rain
Wet
33
11/9/2010
Tuesday
6:55 PM
Angle
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Rain
Wet
34
12/31/2010
Friday
12:24 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
35
1/11/2011
Tuesday
5:34 PM
Rear‐End
Clear
Sleet/Hail/Freezi
ng Rain
36
2/17/2011
Thursday
6:37 PM
Head on
Clear
Wet
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Daylight
Clear
Dry
37
2/18/2011
Friday
7:30 AM
Single Vehicle Crash
38
3/10/2011
Thursday
2:12 PM
Rear‐End
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Injury
Injury
Property Damage
Property Damage
Wrong side or wrong way
Comments
Veh2 and Veh3 stopped in traffic, Veh1 struck Veh2 from behind pushing Veh2 into Veh3
Veh1 turned left across traffic and struck Veh2 due to emergency vehicle
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turned left in front of Veh2
No improper driving
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Driving too fast for conditions/ Operating defective Veh1 had defective brakes and crashed into Veh2, Veh2 was equipment
pushed into Veh3, Veh3 was pushed into Veh4
Inattention
Veh1 veered to right striking fire hydrant and utility pole
No improper driving
Veh1 turning right into driveway, top of truck caught low hanging wires
Inattention/ Failed to yield right of way
Veh2 changed lanes and struck Veh1
39
3/25/2011
Friday
1:01 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Injury
Driving too fast for conditions
Veh2 braked quickly to avoid a collision with a turning vehicle and was struck by Veh1 from behind
40
3/30/2011
Wednesday
7:21 AM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
Property Damage
Followed too closely
Veh2 slowed to turn right and was struck by Veh1
Clear
Dry
Injury
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turned left into traffic striking Veh2
Clear/Cloudy
Wet
41
4/2/2011
Saturday
9:24 PM
Angle
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
42
4/29/2011
Friday
7:10 AM
Rear‐End
Daylight
43
5/11/2011
Wednesday
5:26 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
44
5/20/2011
Friday
2:54 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
45
6/14/2011
Tuesday
3:41 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Cloudy
Dry
46
6/29/2011
Wednesday
8:44 PM
Angle
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
47
8/11/2011
Thursday
9:53 AM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
48
8/27/2011
Saturday
5:20 PM
Angle
Daylight
Cloudy/Rain
Wet
49
9/19/2011
Monday
7:21 AM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
50
9/21/2011
Wednesday
1:00 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
51
9/23/2011
Friday
3:23 PM
Angle
Daylight
Rain
Wet
52
9/26/2011
Monday
1:49 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
53
10/11/2011
Tuesday
4:23 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
54
10/21/2011
Friday
8:58 PM
Head on
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Clear
Dry
55
11/3/2011
Thursday
9:51 AM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
56
11/5/2011
Saturday
12:12 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
57
11/16/2011
Wednesday
7:35 AM
Angle
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
58
11/26/2011
Saturday
9:59 AM
Angle
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
59
12/19/2011
Monday
7:18 AM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
60
12/24/2011
Saturday
5:22 PM
Sideswipe, opposite Dusk
Clear
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Injury
Property Damage
Property Damage
Injury
No improper driving
Veh1 stopped in traffic and was struck from behind by Veh2
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings/ Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 ran red light
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turning left collided with Veh2 (motorcycle)
Made an improper turn/ inattention
No improper driving
Veh1 moved to the left to make a right‐turn striking Veh2 in the process
Veh1 turning left into drive struck by unknown veh that then fled, crashed into Veh2 at the intersection
Glare/ Inattention
Veh1 turned left into traffic striking Veh2
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Followed too closely
Veh1 (oil truck) turned left into driveway and was struck from behind by Veh2
Injury
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings
Veh1 ran red light
Failed to yield right of way
Veh2 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 changing lanes struck Veh2
Glare/ Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Inattention/ Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings/ Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 ran red light
Dry
Injury
Inattention
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1
Dry
Property Damage
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
Harts Four Corners ‐ Crash Data Summary Table
No.
Crash Date
Crash Day
Time of Day
Manner of Collision
Light Condition
Weather Condition
Road Surface
61
1/1/2012
Sunday
8:21 PM
Rear‐End
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Clear
Dry
62
1/9/2012
Monday
1:20 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
63
1/11/2012
Wednesday
1:34 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Daylight
Cloudy
Wet
Clear
Dry
64
1/24/2012
Tuesday
9:23 AM
Single Vehicle Crash
65*
2/17/2012
Friday
6:27 PM
Rear‐End
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Clear
Dry
Clear
Dry
66
2/22/2012
Wednesday
8:25 PM
Rear‐End
67
3/11/2012
Sunday
10:27 PM
Angle
68
3/22/2012
Thursday
3:57 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
69
3/24/2012
Saturday
9:01 AM
Angle
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
70
3/29/2012
Thursday
8:07 AM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Daylight
Cloudy/ Sleet/ Hail/ Freezing Wet
Clear
Dry
Clear
Dry
71
3/31/2012
Saturday
9:49 AM
Rear‐End
72*
4/2/2012
Monday
7:37 PM
Rear‐End
73
4/6/2012
Friday
9:31 PM
Rear‐End
74
4/18/2012
Wednesday
5:20 AM
75
4/19/2012
Thursday
10:41 AM
Angle
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Clear
Dry
Single Vehicle Crash
Sideswipe, same direction
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Clear
Dry
Daylight
Clear
76
4/28/2012
Saturday
11:57 PM
77
5/13/2012
Sunday
3:30 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
78
5/31/2012
Thursday
2:16 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
79
6/2/2012
Saturday
1:52 PM
Single Vehicle Crash
Daylight
Rain
Wet
80
6/18/2012
Monday
2:18 PM
Angle
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
81
6/30/2012
Saturday
11:35 AM
Head on
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Clear
Dry
82
7/13/2012
Friday
7:43 PM
Rear‐End
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
83
7/16/2012
Monday
8:47 AM
Head on
Daylight
Clear
Dry
84
7/18/2012
Wednesday
3:57 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Cloudy/Rain
Wet
85
7/25/2012
Wednesday
4:52 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
86
8/5/2012
Sunday
2:27 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
87
8/21/2012
Tuesday
5:42 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
88
8/23/2012
Thursday
5:12 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
89
8/25/2012
Saturday
2:22 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
90
8/31/2012
Friday
5:06 PM
Sideswipe, same direction
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
Severity
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Collision with Pedestrian
Injury
Property Damage
Property Damage
Injury
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Driver Contributing Code Comments
Followed too closely
Veh1 and Veh2 stopped at red light, Veh3 struck Veh2 pushing Veh2 into Veh1
Inattention
Veh2 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 changing lanes struck Veh2
Failed to yield right of way
Pedestrian in crosswalk crossing without walk signal
Inattention
N/A
Unknown
Veh1 stopped at red light struck from behind by Veh2
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Followed too closely
Veh2 and Veh3 stopped at red light, Veh1 struck Veh2 pushing Veh2 into Veh3
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turned left across traffic and struck Veh2
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turned left across traffic and struck Veh2
Followed too closely/ Inattention
Veh2 and Veh3 stopped at red light, Veh1 struck Veh2 pushing Veh2 into Veh3
Injury
Followed too closely/ Distracted
Veh1 stopped in traffic struck from behind by Veh2
Injury
Followed too closely/ Distracted
Veh1 stopped at red light struck from behind by Veh2
Other improper action
Veh2 passed Veh1 on right, Veh1 turned right to enter driveway striking Veh2
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Injury
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Over‐correcting/Over‐steering/ Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road
Veh1 misjudged a left turn and struck a utility pole
Passing on right
Veh1 passed Veh2 on right through intersection colliding at the merge point beyond the intersection
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
No improper driving
Veh1 was cut off by another driver and ran into a fire hydrant
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 changed lanes and struck Veh2
Failed to yield right of way
Veh2 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1
Inattention/ Failed to yield right of way
Veh2 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
Followed too closely
Veh1 stopped in traffic struck from behind by Veh2
Failed to yield right of way
Veh2 ran red light striking Veh1
Failed to yield right of way
Veh2 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
Followed too closely
Veh1 stopped in traffic struck from behind by Veh2
Other improper action
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Distracted
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1
Disregarded traffic signs, signals, road markings/ Operated vehicle in reckless manner
Veh1 and Veh2 turning left, Veh1 tried to pass Veh2 on left striking Veh2 in the process
Harts Four Corners ‐ Crash Data Summary Table
Manner of Collision
Sideswipe, opposite Light Condition
Weather Condition
Road Surface
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Clear
Dry
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Clear
Dry
Cloudy
Daylight
Rear‐End
No.
Crash Date
Crash Day
Time of Day
91
9/2/2012
Sunday
10:39 PM
92
9/12/2012
Wednesday
8:54 AM
Rear‐End
93
10/22/2012
Monday
9:19 PM
Rear‐End
94
11/17/2012
Saturday
5:00 PM
Rear‐End
95
12/16/2012
Sunday
11:56 AM
Rear‐End
96
12/18/2012
Tuesday
5:44 PM
97
1/16/2013
Wednesday
8:20 AM
Severity
Driver Contributing Code Comments
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Inattention
Veh2 failed to shut off turning signal, Veh1 thought Veh2 was turning left, Veh2 drove straight into Veh1
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped at red light was struck from behind by Veh1
Dry
Injury
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped at red light was struck from behind by Veh1
Cloudy
Dry
Property Damage
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped for pedestrians in crosswalk was struck from behind by Veh1
N/A
N/A
N/A
Injury
N/A
Veh1 struck Veh2 from behind while traveling
Single Vehicle Crash
Daylight
Snow
Snow
Snow
Wet
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
98
2/16/2013
Saturday
5:22 PM
Angle
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
99
3/15/2013
Friday
5:24 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
100
4/18/2013
Thursday
8:09 PM
Head on
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Clear
Dry
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
101
5/1/2013
Wednesday
2:00 PM
Sideswipe, same direction
102
5/24/2013
Friday
8:49 AM
Angle
103
6/2/2013
Sunday
5:46 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
104
6/13/2013
Thursday
12:16 PM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Rain
Wet
105
6/17/2013
Monday
7:24 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
106
6/19/2013
Wednesday
3:31 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Clear
Dry
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Unknown
Veh1 slid and hit utility pole
Other improper action
Veh2 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
Other improper action
Veh2 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
Injury
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh2
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 changed lanes and struck Veh2
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Failed to yield right of way
Inattention
Followed too closely
Veh1 turned left across traffic and struck Veh2
Veh1 made a wide turn as Veh2 was entering parking lot striking Veh2
Veh1 and Veh2 stopped in traffic, Veh3 struck Veh2 from behind pushing Veh2 into Veh1
Injury
Made an improper turn/ Failed to yield right of way
Veh2 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
Injury
Other improper action/ Failed to yield right of way
Veh2 pulled out from driveway and struck Veh1
No improper driving
Veh1 turned left across traffic and struck Veh2
Inattention/ Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turned left across traffic and struck Veh2
Followed too closely
Veh2 and Veh3 stopped in traffic, Veh1 struck Veh2 from behind pushing Veh2 into Veh3
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 changed lanes and struck Veh2
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turned left across traffic and struck Veh2
107*
7/10/2013
Wednesday
11:10 PM
Sideswipe, opposite 108
10/19/2013
Saturday
1:16 PM
Angle
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
109
10/26/2013
Saturday
11:32 AM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
110
12/5/2013
Thursday
5:45 PM
Angle
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Clear
Dry
111
12/17/2013
Tuesday
1:30 PM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Clear
Dry
Injury
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turned left across traffic and struck Veh2
Clear
Dry
Property Damage
Failed to yield right of way
Veh1 turned left across traffic and struck Veh2
Cloudy
Dry
Injury
Unknown
Other improper action
112
12/22/2013
Sunday
7:10 PM
Head on
113
12/22/2013
Sunday
8:14 PM
Angle
114
1/27/2014
Monday
1:59 PM
Head on
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Dark‐ Lighted Roadway
Daylight
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Property Damage
Veh2 turned left across traffic and struck Veh1
115
3/6/2014
Thursday
11:46 AM
Angle
Daylight
Cloudy
Dry
Property Damage
116
6/13/2014
Friday
10:47 AM
Angle
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Injury
Failure to keep in proper lane or running off road/ Other improper action
Veh1 was driving to the right of Veh2, Veh2 turned right to enter driveway striking Veh1
Veh1 put vehicle into reverse to make space to switch lanes at a red light colliding with Veh2
117
7/21/2014
Monday
9:50 AM
Rear‐End
Daylight
Clear
Dry
Property Damage
Followed too closely
Veh2 stopped in traffic was struck by Veh1