ROAD SAFETY AUDIT Route 101 (Center Street)/Corey Hill Road/Williams Road Town of Ashburnham May 31, 2013 Prepared For: MassDOT Highway Division Prepared By: BETA Group, Inc. Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Table of Contents Project Data .................................................................................................................................1 Background .................................................................................................................................2 Project Description .....................................................................................................................2 Audit Observations .....................................................................................................................5 Potential Safety Enhancements .................................................................................................7 Summary of Road Safety Audit.................................................................................................9 List of Appendices Appendix A. Appendix B. Appendix C. Appendix D. RSA Meeting Agenda RSA Audit Team Contact List Detailed Crash Data Speed Regulations List of Figures Figure 1. Location Map ......................................................................................................................... 3 List of Tables Table 1. Table 2. Table 3. Participating Audit Team Members ....................................................................................... 1 Estimated Time Frame and Costs Breakdown ....................................................................... 7 Potential Safety Enhancement Summary ............................................................................. 10 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Project Data A Road Safety Audit for the intersection of Route 101 (Center Street), Corey Hill Road and Williams Road was held on May 8, 2013 at the Ashburnham Town Hall in Ashburnham, MA. As indicated in Table 1, the audit team consisted of representatives from State, Regional and Local agencies and included a cross-section of engineering, planning and emergency response expertise. Table 1. Participating Audit Team Members Audit Team Member Agency/Affiliation Corey O’Connor MassDOT Highway Division – Safety Section Peter Calves MassDOT Highway Division (Intern) Qing Qing You MassDOT Highway Division (Intern) George Snow MRPC Joe Frawley MassDOT Highway Division – District 3 Traffic Doug Briggs Ashburnham Town Manager Stephen Nims Ashburnham DPW Superintendent Larry Barrett Ashburnham Police Chief Greg Lucas BETA Group, Inc. Justin Curewitz BETA Group, Inc. Page 1 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Background The Federal Highway Administration defines a Road Safety Audit (RSA) as the formal safety examination of an existing or future road or intersection by an independent, multidisciplinary team. The purpose of an RSA is to identify potential safety issues and possible opportunities for safety improvements considering all roadway users. A Road Safety Audit was scheduled for the intersection of Route 101 with Corey Hill Road and Williams Road in Ashburnham because it has been identified as a high crash location within the Montachusett Regional Planning Commission (MRPC) region. This location is eligible for Highway Safety Improvement Project funding as well as High Risk Rural Road Program funding. The RSA is intended to identify potential short and long term safety improvements that can be made at the intersection, which can then be implemented through general maintenance for short term low cost improvements or potentially incorporated into a reconstruction project for longer term measures. A resurfacing project is scheduled for a 4.5 mile segment of Route 101 in 2014, including the project intersection. Recommended improvements can be incorporated into that project to the greatest extent practicable, or packaged and initiated as a separate project. Project Description The intersection of Route 101 with Corey Hill Road and Williams Road, shown in Figure 1, is located in the southern portion of Ashburnham. Route 101 is a north-south route but generally follows an east-west alignment through the intersection; for clarity purposes, this report will refer to it as an east-west route. The east leg, Central Street, connects to Ashburnham’s town center approximately 1.1 miles east of the intersection. The west leg, Center Street, provides a connection from Ashburnham to Route 140 and the City of Gardner to the southwest. It was noted that the majority of traffic from Route 2 to Ashburnham travels through the intersection, either via Route 140 and Route 101 or via local roads to Williams Road. Route 101 is functionally classified as a Rural Major Collector and is under Town of Ashburnham jurisdiction. Williams Road and Corey Hill Road are both Rural Minor Collectors under town jurisdiction. Land use in the area is primarily residential. A residence on the southwest corner of the intersection directly abuts both Center Street and Williams Road, while residences on the northwest and northeast corners have wooded buffers between the home and the intersection. The southeast corner is an undeveloped, wooded parcel. Ashburnham’s post office is located on Central Street approximately ¼ mile east of the intersection, and the town’s police and fire headquarters are located just east of the post office. The intersection is a 4-way intersection, with Williams Road and Corey Hill Road under STOP sign control. A 4-way flashing beacon is mounted overhead in the center of the intersection, displaying a flashing yellow indication to Route 101 and a flashing red Williams Road approach to Route 101 Page 2 COREY CE N ( R TR A OU L T E ST 10 REE 1) T AD HILL RO WILLIAMS ROAD ET TRE1) S ER E 10 NT CE ROUT ( LEGEND STUDY INTERSECTION Road Safety Audit Center St (Route 101) at Corey Hill/Williams Rds Ashburnham, MA Figure 1 Location Map Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. indication to Williams Road and Corey Hill Road. Route 101 provides a single travel lane in each direction along its length, following a generally hilly, wooded alignment with sparsely spaced residences. Williams Road provides a single travel lane in each direction, widening at the approach to Route 101 to provide a shared left-through lane and an exclusive right turn lane. A lane use sign is provided indicating the intended lane assignments, but corresponding pavement markings are faded. It was noted that the right turn Lane use sign on Williams Road lane was once marked with cross-hatch markings in an attempt to prohibit use because of visibility issues created by right-turning vehicles. It was subsequently noted that the prohibition was not adhered to and that the operational and queuing concerns indicated a need for the added capacity of the right turn lane. A larger STOP sign provided for Williams Road provides increased visibility for approaching vehicles. Corey Hill Road approaches the intersection on a downhill grade and provides a single travel lane in each direction, but is wide enough at the stop line to allow separation between a right-turning vehicle and a left-turning or through vehicle. Pavement markings are extremely faded to the point of being indistinguishable on Route 101. Centerlines and stop lines are barely visible on Williams Road and Corey Hill Road. No sidewalks or crosswalks are provided in the vicinity of the intersection. Poor pavement conditions were noted, including shoulder deterioration and uneven surfaces. A recent water main burst in the northwest quadrant of the intersection left a 5’x5’ break in the pavement which was filled in with dirt on the day of the audit. Severe deformation of the pavement was observed in the middle of the intersection, potentially due to the liquefaction of soils under the roadway as a result of the water main break. Town personnel noted that the dirt patch was to be repaired the week of the audit. Crash data provided by the Ashburnham Police Department and summarized by MassDOT show 21 crashes from December 2009 to November 2012. A collision diagram and crash summary are included in the Appendix. The prevalent crash type were angle crashes, comprising 71% of total crashes. 23% of the crashes involved drivers aged 20 and under; the proximity of the high school and higher percentage of inexperienced drivers is a likely factor. Thirteen crashes involved vehicles exiting Williams Road. Seven of the thirteen crashes involved a vehicle traveling west on Route 101, while the remaining six involved an eastbound vehicle. Crashes likely result from limited visibility of approaching traffic based on the topography of the area, exacerbated by vehicle speeds along Route 101. Two crashes were attributed to limited visibility from a vehicle in the turn lane. Three additional angle crashes involved vehicles exiting Corey Hill Road – two with a vehicle traveling westbound on Route 101, and one with an eastbound vehicle. Two crashes at the intersection involved a vehicle running off the road and hitting a fixed object; one struck a pole on the southwest corner, the other struck a guardrail on the southeast corner. The majority of crashes occur during the afternoon hours, potentially indicating that solar glare is a factor. It should also be noted that six of the 21 total crashes, or 29%, occurred under wet, snowy or icy road conditions. Speed regulations maintained by MassDOT Highway Division establish a 35 MPH speed limit for Route 101 in the vicinity of the intersection. Complete speed regulations are included in the Appendix. Page 4 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Audit Observations Following a brief introduction to the RSA process and a summary of existing crash information, the audit participants were asked to discuss safety issues at the intersection of Route 101, Williams Road and Corey Hill Road. Audit participants then conducted a site visit as a group, at which time they offered observations on safety issues and concerns. A summary of those major safety considerations is as follows: Visibility – Horizontal curves in advance of the intersection on both Route 101 approaches limit visibility for vehicles departing Williams Road and Corey Hill Road and for vehicles approaching on Route 101. This is likely the primary factor in angle crashes at the intersection. It was noted that trees have been trimmed at the intersection to improve sight lines. Several specific items related to visibility were identified by the audit team: o The guardrail on the southeast corner may also contribute to visibility restrictions for drivers looking east from Williams Road. o A picket fence, granite pillars and utility poles on the southwest corner contribute to visibility constraints for drivers looking west from Williams Road. It was noted that the fence and granite pillars were erected by the homeowner following a crash in which a vehicle came to rest on their property. o Vehicles stacked side by side on the two lane Williams Road approach can block each other’s visibility, and was cited as a specific cause of two crashes at the intersection. In addition, vehicles pass the stop line on Williams Road and Corey Hill Road to assess whether it is safe to enter the intersection due to the limited visibility. View looking west from Williams Road View looking east from Williams Road Queues – It was noted that vehicle queues exist on Corey Hill Road in the morning peak period and on Williams Road during school departure times and in the afternoon commuter peak. An elementary school, middle school and regional high school are all located on or near Williams Road south of Route 101, and most buses travel through the intersection as part of their route to and from the Page 5 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. schools. One crash at the intersection during the study period involved a school bus. Queues and increased delays during peak periods may cause drivers to take chances on unacceptable gaps, exacerbating concerns relating to visibility constraints. Solar Glare – Solar glare was noted to be a concern at the intersection, specifically during the afternoon in the winter months. Pavement Markings - Pavement markings are faded to non-existent at the intersection. This is especially of concern for the two lane Williams Road approach. Intersection Awareness – “Dangerous Intersection” signs are located in advance of the intersection, but their effectiveness was questioned by the audit team. The sign on the Route 101 westbound approach is leaning away from the roadway, further reducing its effectiveness. Speed- Speeding along Route 101 was noted as a safety concern. Speed can also be a contributing factor with visibility in the crash history of the intersection, as drivers may misjudge the speed of an approaching vehicle and take a chance on an unacceptable gap. Turning Radius – It was noted that larger vehicles, including school buses, encroach on westbound traffic when making a right turn from Williams Road to Route 101 eastbound. This is likely due to both the tight radius of the corner as well as the lack of shoulder and defined markings on Williams Road, which may force turning vehicles to the right edge of pavement before turning. Contributing Factors – While not specifically identified as safety issues, a number of items were mentioned by audit participants as contributors to traffic at the intersection and items that should be considered as part of any redesign of the intersection. o The previously discussed proximity of schools generates a significant amount of school bus traffic in the morning and the mid-afternoon. Schools also generate traffic from parents dropping off children, as well as high school students that drive themselves to school. It should be noted that 23% of crashes at the intersection involved drivers between the ages of 17 and 20. o Despite the lack of pedestrian and/or bicycle facilities, Route 101 experiences a fair amount of pedestrian, jogger and bicycle activity. o The Ashburnham post office located ¼ mile east of the intersection generates traffic through the intersection, especially on Saturday. o An industrial park nearby in Gardner generates truck traffic along Route 101 through the intersection. o The Ashburnham Public Safety Building is located a ¼ mile east of the intersection; police, fire and EMS vehicles regularly travel through the intersection to respond to emergency calls. Page 6 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Potential Safety Enhancements Audit participants identified safety issues and recommended potential improvements to address these issues. Audit participants were encouraged to consider both short and long term improvements for each issue. Each improvement considered has been categorized as short-term, mid-term, or long-term based on the definitions shown in Table 2. Additionally, a cost category has been assigned to each improvement based on the parameters set forth in Table 2. Table 2. Estimated Time Frame and Costs Breakdown Time Frame Short-term <1 year Costs Low Mid-term 1–3 years Medium Long-term >3 years High <$10,000 $10,000–$50,000 >$50,000 Consider overall improvement strategies related to traffic control. Two distinct strategies were discussed at the audit and are detailed below. Both strategies would reduce reliance on the driver determining the proper gap acceptance. Further study is necessary to determine the appropriateness and impact of either recommendation. Development of either recommendation must consider the contributing factors discussed by the audit team and outlined in this report. o Consider a roundabout. A roundabout concept was discussed by the audit team. A letter was sent to Town officials from the homeowner on the southeast corner of the intersection stating concerns over property acquisition required to accommodate improvements at the intersection. It was suggested by audit participants that the center of the roundabout could be shifted slightly to the east from the center of the existing intersection. Installation of a roundabout would help calm traffic on Route 101, increasing awareness of the intersection and addressing visibility and gap acceptance issues, while giving side street traffic greater opportunity to enter traffic on Route 101. A roundabout is a long-term, high cost improvement which requires further study and determination of property impacts. o Consider installation of a traffic signal. A traffic signal would stop traffic on Route 101 to allow traffic from Williams Road and Corey Hill Road to enter, and would also increase awareness of the intersection for vehicles approaching on Route 101. Installation of a traffic signal would require further study, which includes but is not limited to warrant analysis, to determine if a traffic signal at this location is an effective safety countermeasure. Recent traffic volume data were not available, but Town officials noted that traffic volumes have noticeably increased in the last five years. Installation of a traffic signal is a long-term, high cost improvement. A traffic signal installation should include emergency preemption equipment due to the proximity of the police and fire stations. Review property plans to determine if the picket fence and granite pillars on the southeast corner of the intersection are on private property. If these items are within the town-owned right-of-way, they Page 7 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. should be relocated onto the homeowner’s property. This is a short-term, low cost improvement. It was suggested that they are on the homeowner’s property, but this should be reviewed to be certain. Continue to trim vegetation along Route 101. It was noted that existing vegetation is consistently maintained to avoid sight obstructions at the intersection, and that further trimming is not possible because vegetation is on private property. Continued maintenance is recommended as a short-term, low cost measure to ensure that vegetation does not create a sight obstruction. Relocate guardrail on the southeast corner. The existing guardrail is located close to the roadway and may create a sight obstruction for drivers departing Williams Road. The guardrail should be relocated further back from the roadway, possibly in conjunction with widening of the corner radius. This is a short-term, low cost improvement. Reapply pavement markings at the intersection. Existing markings are faded to the point of being indistinguishable. Markings should be reapplied by the town as a short-term, low cost improvement. Thermoplastic markings are recommended due to their longer lifespan. Arrow and ONLY markings should be applied matching the lane use sign on Williams Road, and it was suggested that “STOP” word markings be added to the stop lines on both side streets. Replace existing “Dangerous Intersection” warning signage with W2-1 Intersection Warning signs on Route 101. It was suggested that the existing signs are not effective in reducing speeds or changing driver behavior for drivers on Route 101. It was also noted that the sign facing westbound traffic is leaning away from the roadway, reducing its effectiveness. It is recommended that these signs be replaced with standard Intersection Warning signs with a fluorescent yellow background. It was also suggested that these signs have supplemental plaques with the street name, consistent with FHWA recommendations for low cost improvements at STOP controlled intersections. After further discussion, it was recommended that a supplemental speed plaque may be more effective in reducing driver speeds. It is also recommended that signs be placed on both sides of the roadway, which is also consistent with FHWA recommendations. This is a short-term, low cost improvement. Continue to enforce the 35 mph speed limit on Route 101. The Town should continue enforcement in this area as a short-term, ongoing improvement, the cost of which is reduced enforcement elsewhere in the Town. Replace speed limit signs. Existing speed limit signs appear to be older signs and are likely not reflective at night. Signs immediately adjacent to the intersection should be replaced in kind. This is a short-term, low cost improvement. Increase the southeast corner radius. This improvement requires further study to determine the amount of widening necessary to eliminate encroachment from larger vehicles including school buses. This is a short-term, low cost improvement, provided that there is adequate right of way beyond the existing guardrail and no grading work is needed. Page 8 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Warning signage alerting drivers to solar glare was discussed, but is not recommended at this time. Solar glare warning signage such as that found on Route 2 warns drivers in advance of solar glare conditions, but is not likely to help at an intersection where solar glare contributes to other visibility concerns. It was also noted that existing signage warning of the dangerous intersection does not result in a change in driver behavior, suggesting that additional text based warning signage may be ineffective and simply create sign clutter. Widen Route 101 to accommodate wide shoulders. This would improve overall visibility for all approaching vehicles, give vehicles a slightly bigger recovery zone and improve the turning radius from side streets. There is available right-of-way on the north side of Route 101 and may require the widened road to be shifted to the north to avoid and/or limit property acquisition. It should be noted that speed may become more of an issue with a widened roadway, and increased enforcement may be needed. This is a long-term, high cost improvement. Implement a driver awareness program at the high school. The program would educate high school students about exhibiting safe habits at the intersection and can include education relating to any potential future improvements. This is a short-term, low cost improvement. Summary of Road Safety Audit Table 3 summarizes potential recommendations discussed by the audit team. The recommendations are categorized based on the potential safety payoff, as well as by time frame and cost. The safety payoff is a qualitative judgment of the effectiveness of the potential safety improvements. Each recommendation has a responsibility assigned to it stating whether MassDOT or the Town of Ashburnham would be responsible for implementing the recommended improvement. All improvements have an order of magnitude cost assigned. Page 9 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Table 3. Potential Safety Enhancement Summary Safety Issue Safety Enhancement Responsibility Safety Payoff Time Frame Cost Consider overall improvement strategies related to traffic control. The first two improvements listed present different treatments for these issues, and require further study. Visibility, Queues, Intersection Awareness, Speed, Turning Radius Consider a roundabout. Town High Long-term High Visibility, Queues, Intersection Awareness Consider installation of a traffic signal. This requires a traffic signal warrant analysis. Town High Long-term High Visibility Review property plans to determine if the picket fence and granite pillars on the southeast corner of the intersection are on private property. These items are assumed to be on private property, but should be relocated if they are in the public ROW. Town Medium Short-term TBD Visibility Continue to trim vegetation along Route 101. Town Medium Short-term (Ongoing) $500 Visibility Relocate guardrail on the southeast corner. Town Medium Short-term $5,000 Pavement Markings Reapply pavement markings at the intersection. Arrow and ONLY markings should be applied to match the lane use sign on Williams Road, and STOP word markings are recommended for the stop lines on both side streets. Town Medium Short-term $7,500 Intersection Awareness Replace existing “Dangerous Intersection” warning signage with W2-1 Intersection Warning signs. It is recommended that a supplemental speed plaque be added and that signs are mounted on both sides of the roadway. Town Medium Short-term $1,200 Speed Continue to enforce the 35 mph speed limit on Route 101. Town $0 (Reduced Medium Short-term enforcement elsewhere) Speed Replace speed limit signs. Town Turning Radius Increase the southeast corner radius. This improvement requires further study to determine the amount of widening necessary to eliminate encroachment from larger vehicles including school buses. Town Low Short-term Medium Short-term $500 $15,000 Page 10 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Table 3. Potential Safety Enhancement Summary Safety Issue Safety Enhancement Responsibility Visibility, Intersection Awareness Widen Route 101 to accommodate wide shoulders. There is available right-of-way on the north side of Route 101 and may require the widened road to be shifted to the north to avoid and/or limit property acquisition. Town Intersection Awareness, Contributing Factors Implement a driver awareness program at the high school Town Safety Payoff Time Frame Medium Long-term Low Short-term Cost TBD TBD Page 11 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Appendix A. RSA Meeting Agenda Road Safety Audit Ashburnham, MA Route 101 (Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd Meeting Location: Ashburnham Clerk's Office 32 Main Street, Ashburnham, MA Wednesday, May 8th 2013 1:00 PM – 3:00 PM Type of meeting: High Crash Location – Road Safety Audit Attendees: Invited Participants to Comprise a Multidisciplinary Team Please bring: Thoughts and Enthusiasm!! 1:00 PM Welcome and Introductions 1:15 PM Discussion of Safety Issues • Crash history, Speed Regulations – provided in advance • Existing Geometries and Conditions 2:00 PM Site Visit • Drive to the intersections of Route 101 (Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd As a group, identify areas for improvement 2:30 PM Discussion of Potential Improvements • Discuss observations and finalize safety issue areas • Discuss potential improvements and finalize recommendations 3:00 PM Adjourn for the Day – but the RSA has not ended Instructions for Participants: • Before attending the RSA on May 8th, participants are encouraged to drive/walk through the intersection and complete/consider elements on the RSA Prompt List with a focus on safety. • All participants will be actively involved in the process throughout. Participants are encouraged to come with thoughts and ideas, but are reminded that the synergy that develops and respect for others’ opinions are key elements to the success of the overall RSA process. • After the RSA meeting, participants will be asked to comment and respond to the document materials to assure it is reflective of the RSA completed by the multidisciplinary team. Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Appendix B. RSA Audit Team Contact List Participating Audit Team Members Ashburnham – Route 101 (Centre St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd Email Address Phone Number Date: May 8, 2013 Audit Team Member Location: Agency/Affiliation Greg Lucas Justin Curewitz Corey O’Connor QingQing You Peter Calves George Snow Joe Frawley Doug Briggs Stephen Nims Larry Barrett BETA BETA MassDOT Safety MassDOT Safety MassDOT Safety MRPC MassDOT District 3 Ashburnham Ashburnham Ashburnham Police GLucas@BETA-Inc.com JCurewitz@BETA-Inc.com Corey.oconnor@state.ma.us Qingqing.you@state.ma.us Peter.calves@state.ma.us gnow@mrpc.org Joseph.frawley@dot.state.ma.us dbriggs@ashburnham-ma.gov municipalgrounds@comcast.net lbarrett@ashburnham-ma.gov 781-255-1982 781-255-1982 857-368-9638 857-294-5465 857-368-9620 978-345-7376 508-929-3916 978-827-4100 978-827-4120 978-827-4107 Road Safety Audit—Route 101(Center St)/Corey Hill Rd/Williams Rd—Ashburnham, MA Prepared by BETA Group, Inc. Appendix C. Detailed Crash Data COLLISION DIAGRAM Qho ItoI J REGION: --L..I.M....I..L.l.R.L..P....::.c______ PREPARED BY: _.!,_P-=c:....___ __ ROADWAY NAMES: Ce."h.r/ce,Jr~\ sh. (f\t. rol) ~,..c), Wdka.m r /c(Jre; H,-tj rds. CITYfTOWN: A5h wrn h()., M DATE PREPARED: 1-. Ooq- 'lo 12.. TIME PERIOD ANALYZED: SOURCE OF CRASH REPORTS: Corey HrU f\o~o{. ! North Ctnftr5frtet (Route JoJJ ! ~----"' G) ___ts- ~ ~.,riD) 6J 1}~ 12.} l'fJ UJ ll, ~ rc'?n._f_r_Q,J_s_f_re_e._t_ _ (f<oufe. ft'l) SYMBOLS ------· ---+1...........;;;:1 ---+0 TYPES OF CRASH Moving Vehicle Head On Backing Vehicle Non-Involved Vehicle Angle Pedestrian Turning Move Parked Vehicle Fixed Object Rear End ---+cY<6 Bicycle . ---+"t\7() Animal Sideswipe c:s: cs cs: ... Out of Control SEVERITY 0 Injury Accident 0 Fatal Accident --t Crash Data Summary Table Rt 101 at Corey Hill and Williams Rds, Ashburnham, MA 2009 - 2012 Crash Diagram Ref # 1 2 3 Crash Date Crash Day m/d/y 12/4/09 Friday 4/29/10 Thursday Friday 6/4/10 Time of Day Manner of Collision Type 9:27 AM 7:03 AM 5:07 PM Angle Angle Sideswipe, same direction Light Condition Type Daylight Daylight Daylight Weather Condition Type Clear Clear Clear Road Surface Driver Contributing Code Type Type Dry Failed to yield to right of way Dry Failed to yield to right of way Dry Failed to yield to right of way Ages D1 D2 Comments 58 31 53 17 54 46 Veh 1 did not signal turn 4 9/20/10 Monday 6:08 PM Head on Daylight Clear Dry Swerving or avoiding due to wind, slippery surface, vehicle, object, nonmotorist in roadway, etc. 71 27 Veh 2 lost brake control 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12/17/10 12/31/10 3/18/11 5/6/11 7/24/11 7/28/11 9/7/11 Friday Friday Friday Friday Sunday Thursday Wednesday 7:28 PM 4:20 PM 4:55 PM 12:59 PM 12:55 PM 7:10 PM 3:13 PM Angle Angle Angle Single Vehicle Crash Angle Angle Angle Dark - lighted roadway Dusk Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Daylight Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Clear Rain Dry Wet Dry Dry Dry Dry Wet Made an improper turn Inattention Inattention Exceeded authorized speed limit Failed to yield to right of way Inattention Driving too fast for conditions 19 18 81 17 54 23 66 25 18 20 12 13 9/26/11 10/4/11 Monday Tuesday 2:54 PM 12:37 PM Angle Angle Daylight Daylight Clear Rain Dry Wet Failed to yield to right of way Failed to yield to right of way 18 20 Veh 1 was speeding, ran off road, hit utility pole 47 48 55 Veh 1 hit veh 2 (school bus) in intersection Veh 1 could not see veh 2 while entering intersection. View was obstucted 63 due to veh in turn lane 17 14 15 12/15/11 Thursday 1/31/12 Tuesday 4:46 PM 5:08 PM Sideswipe, opposite direction Angle Dark - lighted roadway Rain Dusk Cloudy Wet Dry Inattention Failed to yield to right of way 50 51 71 77 16 17 2/20/12 3/1/12 Monday Thursday 7:36 PM 8:51 AM Single Vehicle Crash Angle Dry Ice Inattention No Improper Driving 32 44 Veh 1 was distracted in car, drifted and hit guardrail 19 Veh 1 could not stop due to snow and ice 18 3/1/12 Thursday 11:15 AM Angle Dark - lighted roadway Clear Daylight Snow Blowing Sand, Snow Daylight Snow Inattention 58 19 20 4/26/12 8/4/12 Thursday Saturday 2:19 PM 8:50 AM Sideswipe, same direction Angle Daylight Daylight Clear Clear Dry Dry Failed to yield to right of way Inattention 90 63 41 Veh 1 could not stop due to snowy conditions Veh 2 could not see Veh 1 when it pulled into the intersection, due to veh in 17 turn lane 48 Veh 2 did not stop at stop sign 21 11/20/12 Tuesday 5:40 PM Angle Dark - lighted roadway Clear Dry Failed to yield to right of way 32 23 Summary based on Crash Reports obtained from the Ashburnham Police Department Crash Data Summary Tables and Charts Rt 101 at Corey Hill and Williams Rds, Ashburnham, MA CRASH MONTH 19% 20% 14% 15% 14% 10% 10% 5% 5% 5% J F 10% 5% 5% M J 5% 5% 5% O N 0% M A J A CRASH DAY OF WEEK 29% 30% 20% 14% D 29% 14% 10% 0% S 5% Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday 5% 5% Saturday Sunday CRASH TIME OF DAY 29% 30% 19% 20% 10% 0% 14% 5% 5% 6AM8AM 14% 14% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8AM10AM 10AM12PM 12PM2PM 2PM4PM 4PM6PM 6PM8PM 8PM10PM 10PM12AM 12AM2AM 2AM4AM 4AM6AM CRASH MANNER OF COLLISION 80% 71% 60% 40% 20% 0% 10% Single Vehicle Crash CrashReportSummary.xlsx 10% 0% Rear-end Angle 5% Sideswipe, Sideswipe, same opposite direction direction 5% Head on 0% 0% Rear to Rear Unknown 4/22/2013 Crash Data Summary Tables and Charts Rt 101 at Corey Hill and Williams Rds, Ashburnham, MA CRASH LIGHT CONDITION 80% 71% 60% 40% 20% 0% 0% Daylight 19% 10% Dawn Dusk Dark Lighted Roadway 0% 0% 0% 0% Dark Roadway not lighted Dark unknown roadway lighting Other Unknown CRASH WEATHER CONDITION 80% 71% 60% 40% 0% 0% Unknown 5% 0% Other Sleet, Hail, Freezing Rain Rain 0% Blowing sand, snow 0% Severe Crosswinds 5% Fog, Smog, Smoke 14% Cloudy Clear 0% 5% Snow 20% CRASH ROAD SURFACE 80% 71% 60% 40% 19% 20% 0% Dry Wet 5% 5% Snow Ice 0% 0% Sand, mud, Water dirt, oil, (standing, gravel moving) 0% 0% 0% Slush Other Unknown CRASH DRIVER AGES 30% 23% 20% 20% 15% 8% 10% 0% 15% 15-20 CrashReportSummary.xlsx 21-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 8% 8% 60-69 70-79 5% 80+ 4/22/2013