Project Selection Advisory Council http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/planning/Main/PlanningProcess/ProjectSelectionAdvisoryCouncil.aspx Draft Criteria May 20, 2014 1 | Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot May 20, 2014 Project Selection Advisory Council’s Proposed Project Evaluation Criteria The six draft criteria selected for the PSA Council’s (PSC) proposed method for project prioritization are based on several factors: 2 MassDOT’s Mission Statement, Vision, and Goals MassDOT Policy Directives and Comprehensive Transportation Plan Provisions of Chapter 25 of the Acts of 2009 Provisions from Chapter 46 of the Acts of 2013 Provisions from the latest Federal Transportation Authorization Bill MAP-21 | Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot May 19, 2014 Safety SAFETY: The ability of the transportation system to allow people and goods to move freely, without harm in a secure environment. This measure is used to assess whether a project addresses, maintains and improves safety of the system while ensuring the security of the people and goods in transit. Metrics • • • 3 Identify intersection crash locations, types (car, bike, pedestrian) and causes. Incorporate safety elements into intersection design and maintenance projects. Determine if the project improves bicycling/pedestrian conditions in locations that have experienced pedestrian and bicycle crashes. | Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot May 19, 2014 Mobility/Access MOBILITY/ACCESS: The ability of a project to provide efficient movement of people and goods between all destinations and by all modes. This measure can be used to assess whether a project provides transportation choices and mode shift goals and promotes more connectivity within the Commonwealth. Metrics • Estimate the reduction in person-hours of travel. • Estimate the reduction in transit personhours of travel. • Determine whether the project will reduce commuting times after adjusting for seasonal variations and for changes in the economic activity in the region. 4 | Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot May 19, 2014 Economic Development ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: The ability of a project to facilitate or support business development and employment. This measure is used to assess whether a project has the potential to generate revenue or will support economic development. Metrics • • 5 Use geographical analysis to determine whether the investment is located within an economically distressed area. Perform analysis to determine whether the project is located within a high-employment density area. | Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot 5/19/2014 Social Equity and Fairness SOCIAL EQUITY AND FAIRNESS: The assessment of a project as it relates to existing communities and population centers and to the ability of the transportation system to efficiently move people, goods and services without excessive delay or inconvenience and in accordance with state and federal laws that define protected groups. This measure would assess whether a project supports equitable investment in existing communities and provides community enhancements, such as sidewalks or Safe Routes to School, equitably by distributing both the benefits and burdens of development among all communities. Metrics • Determine whether a project is located within an area that includes Environmental Justice (EJ) or Title VI populations.* * See handout for complete definitions of protected groups under state and federal laws. 6 | Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot 5/19/2014 Healthy Transportation HEALTHY TRANSPORTATION: Assessment of the transportation system’s impact on quality of life, the natural environment and healthy transportation choices with the recognition that we seek to act as better stewards of our environment. This criterion measures whether a project mitigates actual or threatened damage to the environment, including but not limited to: air quality, water quality, energy use, impacts on natural and urban environment, and impacts to collective and personal human health. Metrics • • • • 7 Does the project accommodate bicycling, transit and walking options? Perform analysis to determine whether the project is located within a public health distress area. Estimate the change in Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Determine whether the project can shift people between their modes of travel. | Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot 5/19/2014 System Preservation SYSTEM PRESERVATION: The ability of projects to improve the physical condition of existing transportation assets and to ensure resiliency during extreme weather conditions. This criterion assesses whether a project contributes towards preservation of existing assets and the extent to which the project meets operating objectives, as described in the comprehensive state transportation plans (CIP and WMM) and in regional plans. Metrics • • • 8 Perform a Life Cycle Analysis on major infrastructure projects. Determine if the project address future climate change resiliency planning measures. Determine if the project addresses existing poor transport infrastructure conditions. | Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot 5/19/2014 Discussion Points Regional Equity Need for a clear and concise definition of regional equity. Are the MPO regions or Highway District regions used in the definition? Intended to consider the impact of a project on the equitable allocation of funding, both across the Commonwealth and among the 13 MPO regions. Application on a horizontal or vertical criteria level within the formula? Determine appropriateness as criteria, metric, guideline or all three? Existing approaches to distribution of regional funding: • • 9 | Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot Chapter 90 Formula Massachusetts Association of Regional Planning Agencies (MARPA) Formula 5/19/2014 Discussion Points (cont.) Land Use Planning • Where does land use planning fit into the criteria and/or formula? • How do we weight opportunity to leverage additional funding sources (e.g. Public Private Partnerships)? Universe of Projects for Evaluation and/or Prioritization • Are these criteria applied for projects that are legal commitments or advance adopted policy commitments? • What is the appropriate level of complexity for the prioritization formula and how does that impact the goal of improving transparency? • Are regional target projects included in evaluation and prioritization? 10 | Leading the Nation in Transportation Excellence | www.mass.gov/massdot 5/19/2014