Department Student Success and Support Program (matriculation)
Date March 20, 2105
Goals and Recommendations from Program Plan
List the top five goals and recommendations from the last Program Plan and indicate whether they have been met
Goals / Recommendations from six-year plan
1. Budget for significant overhaul of
online orientation in addition to
providing annual updates; begin
research on new online orientation
In
progress (i
nclude
projected
timeline)
IP and goal
revised;
Sum ‘15
2. Continue to work with IT on accurate
ways to collect orientation data.
Provide 3SP funding for the work
Source of
funding
Comments (include any modifications to goals due to
feedback, discussion and/or evaluation – refer to data
when possible)
SSSP
The new SSSP Plan was submitted to C.O. Oct. ‘14.
Included on that plan that were requirements and
parameters for orientation. I committed there to updating
some specific slides/issues for the ‘14-15 year. There are
other types of orientations we may prefer to develop than
another online orientation. Our current one serves the
basic purpose of providing the same information to all
new students; there are needs we want to address in
other ways (i.e., “in time” and orientations for other
specific groups of students. We will focus on those.
Much work done with IT summer ’14 to get MIS in place
for baseline data beginning fall ’14. Need was much
greater than data around orientation. Ongoing need.
SSSP
3. Increase Program Specialist’s hours
(from SPRAC cuts) from 50%/9 mo’s to
60% 11 months
IP,
Sp ’14 –
F ‘15
SSSP
4. Provide soundproofing in the
assessment center and or carpet to
lessen building noise
IP,
Sp, Su ‘15
Non Cabrillo Part of the SAC West 202 lab conversation.
students
proctoring
revenue
Decision made to reduce number in lab at a time, with
flexibility to increase if needs arise on case-by-case basis
5. Identify pros and cons for reducing
capacity of testing sessions from 55 to
35 students
Revised October 22, 2012
Cabinet did not support in ’14-15; in this year’s plan
(assessment) and again noted here; will put in preliminary
budget
Goal Met
Ongoing
Yes
No
Yes
6. Work with statewide assessment
group on new ways to use multiple
measures
7. Hire additional SSA to provide ed plans
8. Identify ways to use the new retention
software
9. Evaluate the current probation and
disqualification workshops for needed
alterations; identify plans to begin
offering to Probation 1 students
10. Educate college staff on categorical
requirements and funding compliance
IP,
12-18 mo’s
IP,
Sp ‘15
11. Identify collaborative efforts with
Instruction that meet SSAct goals—
basic skills, PD, conferences
12. Identify new “What Next steps” post
assessment to better reach high risk
students.
13. Identify ways to increase
confidentiality in assessment when
giving scores
Waiting for statewide group to determine
SSSP
SSSP and
Student
Equity
IP,
Sp ’15;
F&Sp ’1516
SSSP
Hired March 2015
Training with Colleague spring 2015
Yes
Ongoing
Workshops evaluated by faculty; changes made to
workshops where warranted; decision not to offer these
workshops to Probation 1 students—no capacity and may
be better ways. That is IP
Presented at Faculty Senate, CPC and individually. Seems
to be greater understanding of the focus and limitations of
SSSP funding
Educated Basic Skills Committee and other faculty groups
on SSSP; SSSP coordinator invited to be part of Leading
from the Middle to design new efforts to reach Student
Equity groups (PD); attended other PD/conferences with
Instruction faculty-Student Success and Academic Senate
conferences. This has been the greatest collaboration
between Instruction and SS in years
Part of assessment plan (need increased hours for
program specialist)
Yes
Addressed in assessment plan—made space in offices
(Aptos) and in adjacent classrooms (Watsonville.)
Yes
Yes;
Ongoing
Ongoing
Ongoing
New Goals and Recommendations Student Services Program Planning Annual Update
Since Last Program Plan
List any new goals and recommendations identified by the department
Goal/Recommendation (include timeline)
Revised October 22, 2012
Cost
Explanation/Evidence of Need
Status (Comment on progress of
1.Identify new positions that meet SSSP
needs (i.e., degree audit, ed planning
collaboration, new counselor in case of
retirement ’15-16
2. Identify ways to offset some GF expenses
with appropriate SSSP funds (IT, PRO,
evaluators, SSAs, counseling div ass’t., etc.)
3. Begin reconfiguring 13 counselors’ offices
to decrease ergonomic issues with present
layout and equipment
SSLO/AUO Assessment Progress
$180,000.
(indicate how this need was
assessed)
TBD
SSSP office sees appropriate offsets;
also requested by Cabinet
$3,000 yr 1
(GF- SSSP will not
allow furniture
purchases)
Three counselors are having serious
ergo issues with the added
technology and others are
beginning to. We need to replace
desks with sit stand and have dual
monitors.
new goals/recommendations
listed in last annual update)
In a sentence or two, describe where your department should be with ongoing assessment (what assessment you should have done in the last
year) and what was actually done. If any task was not completed, explain why.
Fill out the Assessment Results section below.
SSLO/AUO Assessment Results
Revised October 22, 2012
List SSLO/AUO assessments, dialogues, and priorities identified as a result of your assessment below.
Attach Departmental Assessment Analysis Forms completed in the last two semesters.
Core Competency, Program
SSLO/AUO Assessed
Date of meeting where
analysis / dialogue took
place. Example: Department
Meeting on 00/00/2012
annual update SSSP program plan march 2015
Revised October 22, 2012
Priorities identified for program as a result of assessment.