UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK FACULTY OF SCIENCE Board of the Faculty of Science

advertisement
UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK
FACULTY OF SCIENCE
Board of the Faculty of Science
Minutes of the meeting of the Board of the Faculty of Science held on Wednesday 10th November 2010
Present:
Prof T Jones (in the Chair), Prof M Shipman, Prof D Haddleton, Prof A Czumaj, Dr A I
Cristea, Prof N Stocks, Prof J McCarthy, Prof B Thomas, Prof C Sparrow, Dr D Wood, Prof
R Ball, Dr J Robinson, Prof L Robinson, Prof S D Jacka, Prof S Banerji, Prof T Bugg, Dr D
Leadley, Dr J Cave, Prof J Davey, Mr J Lapage
Apologies:
Mr D Maynard, Prof S Jarvis, Prof J Seville, Prof D Evans, Dr T Price, Prof M Keeling, Dr
M Cassidy, Prof D Morley, Dr A Clark, Prof K Lamberts, Prof S Palmer, Prof D Firth
In attendance: Mrs H Ireland, Dr K Leppard, Mr S Williams, Mr D Dean,
Professor Mark Smith, Deputy Vice Chancellor (for item 4(a) Browne Review and CSR
Dr Mike Glover, Academic Registrar (for item 10 Introduction to new Academic Registrar)
Dr Paul Taylor (for item 11 IATL)
MINUTES
01/10-11
Constitution, Membership and Terms of Reference
REPORTED :
(a)
Constitution
(i)
That at its meeting held on 14 October 2010, the Council, on the
recommendation of the Senate, approved for a second time amendments to
Ordinance 7 on Boards of the Faculties and Ordinance 10 on Departments
establishing the Warwick Manufacturing Group as an academic department
within the Faculty of Science and formalising representation from the
School of Life Science on the Board of the Faculty of Science.
(ii)
That the revised constitution of the Board of the Faculty of Science, as set
out in Ordinance 7(3), is as follows:
(a)
The Vice-Chancellor.
(b)
The Head and two other members of academic staff elected by and
from each of the Departments of Chemistry, Computer Science,
Mathematics and Physics; the Schools of Engineering and Life
Sciences; and the Warwick Manufacturing Group.
(c)
The Head of each of the Departments of Biological Sciences and
Warwick HRI.
(d)
The Head and one other member of academic staff elected by and
from each of the Departments of Psychology and Statistics.
(e)
The Chair of the Sub-Faculty of Science, ex officio, and two other
members of academic staff elected by and from the Sub-Faculty.
(f)
The Chair of the Faculty of Science Graduate Studies Committee, ex
officio, and one other member of academic staff elected by and from
the Graduate Studies Committee.
1
(iii)
(g)
The Chair of the Faculty of Science Research and Innovation
Committee, ex officio.
(h)
One member of staff elected by and from the Institute of Education.
(i)
Three members of academic staff, one to be elected by and from
the Board of the Faculty of Medicine, one by and from the Board of
the Faculty of Arts, and one by and from the Board of the Faculty of
Social Sciences.
(j)
Up to three co-opted members, being members of academic staff,
subject to the approval of the Senate.
(k)
Two student members, one of whom shall be a registered
undergraduate student and one who shall be a registered
postgraduate student of the University, elected in accordance with
the Regulations Governing the Procedure for the Election of Student
Members and Observers on the Boards of the Faculties and SubFaculties. The student member will not participate in nor receive
papers for any business affecting the appointment, promotion and
personal affairs of individual members of staff of the University or
affecting the admission, academic assessment or personal affairs of
individual students.
(l)
The Departments within the Faculty of Science shall be the
Departments of Biological Sciences, Chemistry, Computer Science,
Mathematics, Physics, Psychology, Statistics, the School of Life
Sciences, the School of Engineering, Warwick HRI and the Warwick
Manufacturing Group.
That the revised Ordinance 10 on Departments is as follows:
Membership:
(1)
The membership of a Department shall consist of all the
employees of the University who at the 1st of October in any
year hold a contract of employment in that department of at
least twelve months duration (or are seconded or otherwise
assigned). Where an individual holds a contract in more
than one department he/she shall be considered a member
of all the departments concerned, however, only one of the
Heads of Department concerned shall be considered to
have managerial responsibility for an individual who is a
member of more than one department. At the time of an
individual’s appointment the Heads of Department
concerned shall agree who has managerial responsibility
and shall notify the individual concerned in writing.
Responsibilities of a Head of Department:
(2)
Each Department shall have a Head, who shall be
appointed under the provisions of the Ordinance on the
Appointment of Heads of Departments with the exception of
the Dean of the Warwick Medical School who shall be the
Head of the Warwick Medical School (ex officio) and the
Director of the Warwick Manufacturing Group who shall be
the Head of the Warwick Manufacturing Group(ex officio).
(3)
A Head of Department shall be responsible for the
management of her/his department to the Vice-Chancellor
who may appoint a deputy for this purpose.
2
(4)
All members of the department shall be responsible to the
Head through whatever decision-making and management
structures the Head from time-to-time approves.
(5)
Heads shall be responsible for a range of duties defined
from time to time in Regulations.
Management Structures:
(6)
(b)
The University will from time to time promulgate regulations
setting out a framework for the management structure and
staff consultation mechanisms.
Membership
That following a number of changes to membership approved by Chair’s Action
over the summer, the revised membership of the committees within the Faculty of
Science for the academic year 20010/11 is as follows:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(c)
Board of the Faculty of Science, paper BFS.01/10-11 (revised)
Sub-Faculty of Science, paper BFS.02/10-11 (revised)
Graduate Studies Committee of the Faculty of Science, paper BFS.03/10-11
Faculty of Science Information Technology Committee, paper BFS.04/10-11
First Year Board of Examiners, paper BFS.05/10-11 (revised)
Examination Appeals Committee Panels, paper BFS.06/10-11 (revised)
Representatives of the Science Faculty on other Committees, paper
BFS.07/10-11.
Terms of Reference
That Statute 17(4) states that the Board of each Faculty shall have the following
powers and functions:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
(vii)
02/10-11
To regulate, subject to these Statutes and the Ordinances and Regulations
and to review by the Senate, the teaching, curricula and examinations in the
subjects prescribed for the Faculty;
To recommend to the Senate examiners for appointment;
To make recommendations to the Senate for the award of Degrees (other
than Honorary Degrees), Diplomas, Certificates and other distinctions in the
subjects prescribed for the Faculty;
To recommend to the Senate Sub-Faculties and Departments to be
constituted by the Council;
To delegate to the Sub-Faculties such matters as are deemed appropriate;
To appoint members of the Board of the Faculty to be members of the
Senate as provided for under Statute 15;
To discharge such other functions as the Senate may from time to time
determine
Minutes
CONSIDERED:
The minutes of the meeting of the Board of the Faculty of Science held on 26 May 2010.
RESOLVED:
That the minutes of the meeting of the Board of the Faculty of Science held on 26 May
2010 be approved.
3
03/10-11
Matters Arising on the Minutes
(a)
Fees for Intercalated Years (minute BFS.47(c)/08-09 refers)
REPORTED :
(i)
That the Board of the Faculty of Science at its meeting on 26 May 2010
(minute BFS 34(b)/09-10 refers) resolved that the Chair would approach
Departments within the Faculty of Science for further data on the impact of
fees on the take up of the intercalated year scheme and, acting on behalf of
the Board, would present these data to the Fees Working Group and would
continue to raise concerns about the fee structure for students undertaking
an intercalated year.
(ii)
That a request for explanation has been made to the Registrar regarding the
impact of fees on the take up of the intercalated year scheme.
(iii)
That the Fees Working Group at its meeting on 16 June 2010 (minute FWG
26/09-10 refers):
(iv)
(A)
Reported that at its meeting held on 26 May 2010, the Board of the
Faculty of Science had considered the resolution of the Fees
Working Group that the current fee structure for students
undertaking an intercalated year abroad be retained, and had
indicated its wish to continue to pursue this issue.
(B)
Resolved that any further consideration by the Group of the fees
charged to intercalated year students be aligned with the overall
review of undergraduate fee levels to be undertaken following the
outcomes of the Browne Review.
That the Sub-Faculty of Science at its meeting on 20 October 2010 (minute
SFS.03(a)/10-11 refers) resolved that the Chair of the Sub-Faculty would
write to the Chair of the Fees Working Group to request attendance at the
next meeting of the Sub-Faculty of Science on 2 February 2011 to give an
explanation of why the decision was taken to charge the current fee to
students undertaking an intercalated year.
RESOLVED:
That the Chair would take this issue to the next Deputy Vice-Chancellor’s fortnightly
meeting with Chairs of Faculty.
(b)
Review of Implementation of the Personal Tutoring Guidelines (minute BFS.42/0910 refers)
REPORTED :
(i)
That the Personal Tutoring Guidelines as set out in paper BFS.20/09-10 had
been revised in line with the recommendations of the Board of the Faculty of
Science and that they had been strongly endorsed by Senate.
(ii)
That the referrals system within the Department of Economics had been
approved by the Head of Department and that a pilot had been agreed for
2010/11
4
(c)
Briefing Session for New Members of the Faculty Board and its Sub-Committees
(minute BFS.44/09-10 refers)
REPORTED :
That the proposed briefing session for new members was replaced by the Briefing
and Information Event for Members of Senate Committees held on 12 October
2010.
(d)
Directorships of University Research Centres (minute BFS.46/09-10 refers)
REPORTED :
That the Chair of the Board of the Faculty of Science had approved the following
Directorships of University Research Centres over the summer by Chair’s Action:
Fluid
Dynamics
Research
Centre
Risk Initiative
and Statistical
Consultancy
Unit
04/10-11
Director
Professor P Thomas (31
July 2013)
Deputy
Directors
Professors R Kerr and S
Molokov (31 July 2013)
Director
Dr J Fenlon (30 April
2011)
Chair’s Business
RECEIVED:
An oral update from the Chair on the following:
(a)
Initial potential implications for the funding of higher education following the
publication of the Browne Review and the Comprehensive Spending Review
REPORTED (by the Deputy Vice Chancellor):
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
That Warwick remains relatively well placed to manage the
challenges presented by the Browne Review and CSR, but would
need to consider its size and shape going forward;
That the Fees Working Group had been tasked with detailed
modelling on fees, but that there was currently no strong view on
whether the University should have common or differential fees;
That cuts to the HEFCE teaching grant will come into effect from the
2011/12 academic year whilst the increased fee income will only
come into effect from 2012/13, but that Warwick is well placed to
manage this;
That the quality of students selected by the University would remain
high, but with a stronger commitment and delivery of widening
participation
That as a condition of increasing fees the institution will probably be
required to direct greater funding to scholarships and bursaries.
REPORTED (by Professor D Haddleton):
5
That the University should start work on enhancing the student experience now in
areas such as student feedback and that there should be a University-wide
discussion on the balance of scholarships and bursaries offered by the University.
REPORTED (by Professor C Sparrow):
That the University should be discussing the potential implications for the funding
of higher education following the publication of the Browne Review and the CSR in
every forum already rather than waiting for the Fees Working Group to complete its
detailed modelling.
(b)
The School of Life Sciences
REPORTED (by the Head of the School of Life Sciences):
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(c)
That the Head of the School of Life Sciences is undertaking a review of all
the School’s activities;
That new priorities and objectives would be set for the School at the
conclusion of this review and that these would map onto opportunities in
funding and interdisciplinary research;
That Professor Brian Thomas was the new Deputy Head of School.
Election to Representation from the Faculty on the Senate
REPORTED:
(i)
That the continuing members of the Senate appointed by the Board of the
Faculty of Science are as follows:
Professor J Seville (2011)
School of Engineering
Professor A Czumaj (2013)
Department of Computer Science
Professor S Jacka (2013)
Department of Statistics
Professor M Shipman (2013) Department of Chemistry
Professor C Sparrow (2013)
Warwick Mathematics Institute
TBC
The full membership of the Senate is available on the University website at
www.warwick.ac.uk/go/governance/atoz/senate
(ii)
That, per Regulation 2.2, the item was listed on the agenda for the meeting
of the Board and a specific call for nominations had additionally been sent to
members of the Board on 8 November 2010 with the deadline for
nominations to be received prior to the meeting being 12.00 noon on
Wednesday 10 November 2010, noting that nominations could also be
proposed and seconded at the meeting of the Board.
(iii)
That as more than one valid nomination for membership of the Senate from
the Board of the Faculty of Science had been received at or before the
meeting of the Board, a ballot would be held at the meeting.
(iv)
That valid nominations had been received for Professor R Ball and
Professor J McCarthy and that these nominations had been proposed and
seconded by members of the Board in writing along with the written consent
of the nominees.
CONSIDERED:
The appointment of a representative of the Board of the Faculty of Science on the
Senate for the period 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2013
6
RESOLVED:
That Professor J McCarthy be appointed as representative of the Board of the
Faculty of Science on the Senate for the period 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2013,
having received the highest number of votes in the secret ballot conducted at the
meeting of the Board on 10 November 2010.
(d)
Election of a Deputy Chair of the Board of the Faculty of Science
REPORTED:
That the Secretariat would circulate an email to members of the Board asking for
expressions of interest in the position of Deputy Chair with the deadline for
nominations being 12 noon on 26 November 2010.
05/10-11
Harris Report Implementation
REPORTED :
That, at its meeting on 7 July 2010, the Senate considered a progress report on the
implementation of the recommendations of the Harris Report on the University’s
constitutional arrangements, together with an oral report from Professor Mark Harrison,
Chair of the Implementation Group and reported the following:
(by Professor M Harrison):
(i)
That he wished to extend his thanks to the Academic Registrar and the Chair of the
Board of Graduate Studies for their assistance in the preparation of the report and
its recommendations.
(ii)
That the recommendations focused on three main themes:
(A)
(B)
(C)
The strengthening of linkages between the Centre and Departments by
revising the role of the Chair of the Board of the Faculty, and by imposing
greater direction on the way the University creates and distributes
management information and its processes for consultation and wider
dissemination.
The development of additional management capacity at the Centre of the
University (noting that a significant increase in the number of Pro-ViceChancellors was not seen as appropriate at this time), again by revising the
role and responsibilities of the Chair of the Board of the Faculty, and by
giving more discretion (within appropriate constraints) to departments over
academic resourcing and teaching and learning matters.
The need for greater delegation to departments to be accompanied by
appropriate responsibility and rules and systems for risk management.
(iii) That the successful implementation of these recommendations would rely on the
positive engagement of the whole University community.
(By Professor T Docherty)
(iv) That further consideration should be given to the nomenclature relating to proposal to
use the title of “Chair of Faculty” and that the title of “Dean” would be more meaningful in
an external and international context.
7
(By Professor C Sparrow)
(v) That every effort should be taken to ensure that the benefits of the potentially
challenging changes departments would face as a result of these developments were
realised and that this could only be achieved through collaborative effort and transparent
communication.
(By the Deputy Vice-Chancellor)
(vi) That it was recognised that those individuals appointed as the Chairs of Faculty would
require appropriate training and support in order to take on all the duties set out in the
proposed job description.
(vii) That measures were already in place to take forward a number of these actions,
particularly in relation to the Academic Resourcing Committee and strengthening the
University’s interdisciplinary approach.
The Senate resolved the following:
(viii) That the recommendations set out in the report from the Harris Report Implementation
Group be approved;
(ix) That consideration be given to potentially requiring the appointment of a Deputy Chair
of the Faculty Board and the mechanism and role description to implement this;
(x) That the progress in achieving the recommendations with the Harris Report as set out
in the Implementation Plan outlined in Appendix B of the Implementation Group’s report be
reviewed by the Senate in the Autumn Term 2011.
(xi) That the possibility of Chairs of the Boards of the Faculties chairing selection
committees for Professorial posts be considered as a means to provide greater capacity,
noting that the Professorial appointment process was acknowledged as a critical
contributory aspect to the University’s future success and that the Vice-Chancellor, Deputy
Vice-Chancellor and all Pro-Vice-Chancellors were currently permitted to chair panels.
RECEIVED:
The report from the Harris Report Implementation Group to Senate, paper S.37/09-10 .
REPORTED:
That the Academic Resourcing Committee (ARC) was currently considering the
categorization of departments into three tiers with each tier representing a different level of
devolved decision-making.
RECOMMENDED (to the Senate):
That the constitution of the Board of the Faculty of Science be amended to include only
two members per department.
06/10-11
Report from the Faculty of Science IT Committee
RECEIVED:
The minutes of the meeting of the Faculty of Science IT Committee held on 20 October
2010.
REPORTED:
8
(a)That a formal proposal from IT Services to IPSC to outsource staff email to Microsoft is
expected, but that concerns have been raised regarding how effective testing and analysis
of the outsourced service could be undertaken without undue risk.
(b) That the School of Engineering had raised a concern over the user-friendliness of the
University’s electronic module registration system and that an investigation involving
departmental representatives would be undertaken.
07/10-11
Report from the Sub-Faculty
RECEIVED:
The minutes of the meeting of the Sub-Faculty of Science held on 20 October 2010.
REPORTED (by the Chair of the Sub-Faculty):
That the Sub-Faculty had expressed its concerns to the Senior Assistant Registrar
(Teaching Quality) regarding the discussion paper on the Operational Proposals for the
Audit of Departmental Module Approval Processes (SFS.6/10-11) and had requested that
a much lighter touch process be devised.
REPORTED (by the Chair of the Graduate Studies Committee of the Board):
That at its meeting on 2 November 2010, the Graduate Studies Committee had considered
the issue of how to differentiate module approval from changes to course structures and
had resolved that core modules should continue to be approved by the Graduate Studies
Committee, but that optional modules should be approved within departments.
CONSIDERED:
The revised Terms of Reference for the Sub-Faculty of Science, as set out below, noting
the revision to (v) regarding the new module approval processes:
(i)
To advise and report to the Board of the Faculty on all matters relating to the
organisation and teaching in the subjects of the Sub-Faculty including curricula
and examinations;
(ii) CONSIDERED the attendance, progress and conduct of students in the subjects
prescribed for the Sub-Faculty and REPORTED thereon through the Board of the
Faculty to the Senate;
(iii) To deal with matters which may be referred to it by the Board of the appropriate
faculty;
(iv) To advise the Board of the Faculty on nominations of members of the Faculty to
serve on University Committees related to matters of undergraduate study;
(v) To monitor undergraduate module approval and undertake audits of the module
approval processes within academic departments of the Faculty;
(vi) To carry out detailed initial scrutiny of all proposals for new or restructured
undergraduate degree courses in the Faculty and to advise the Board of
Undergraduate Studies on these proposals;
(vii) To consider and approve minor changes in methods of assessment for individual
students.
RESOLVED:
That the revised Terms of Reference for the Sub-Faculty of Science be approved.
08/10-11
Report from the Graduate Studies Committee
RECEIVED:
9
The minutes of the meeting of the Graduate Studies Committee of the Board of the Faculty
of Science held on 2 November 2010.
CONSIDERED:
The revised Terms of Reference for the Graduate Studies Committee of the Faculty of
Science, as set out below, noting the revision to (v) regarding the new module approval
processes:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
To advise and report of the Board of the Faculty on matters relating to postgraduate
teaching and assessment in the Faculty;
To advise the Board of the faculty on nominations of members to the Faculty to
serve on University Committees related to matters of postgraduate study;
To consider all matters referred to it by the Board of the Faculty and the Board of
Graduate Studies;
To carry out a detailed initial scrutiny of all proposals for new or restructured
postgraduate degree courses in the Faculty and to advise the Board of Graduate
Studies on these proposals;
To monitor and undertake audits of postgraduate module approval processes within
academic departments of the Faculty;
To consider and approve minor changes in methods of assessment for individual
students.
RESOLVED:
That the revised Terms of Reference for the Graduate Studies Committee of the Board of
the Faculty of Science be approved.
09/10-11
Report from the Faculty of Science Research and Innovation Committee
RECEIVED:
The minutes of the meeting of the Faculty of Science Research and Innovation Committee
held on 26 October 2010.
REPORTED:
(a) That the Chair of the Faculty and Heads of Departments in the Faculty of Science had
met with the Pro-Vice-Chancellor Research (Science and Medicine) on 10 November 2010
to discuss the Faculty Research Strategy.
(b) That the Vice-Chancellor had held a meeting in October 2010 to celebrate the
University’s successes in FP7 and encourage Departments to increase their engagement
with EU funding sources in future.
10/10-11
Report from the Students’ Union on the Continuing Effects of the Life Sciences Merger
REPORTED :
That as an element of the Students’ Union policy on the Life Sciences Merger (Policy 727),
the Education Officer and relevant faculty representatives from the Students’ Union are
mandated to report upon a number of concerns that are affecting and will continue to affect
students during this initial year of the new School.
RECEIVED:
10
A report from the Students’ Union on the continuing effects of the Life Sciences merger on
students, paper BFS.08/10-11.
REPORTED (by the Students’ Union Representative (UG)):
That second year Biological Sciences students had expressed their concerns over the
unavailability to them of a small number of modules (Protein Structure and Function;
Bioinformatics) and that there were also concerns about the reduction in the number of
research projects.
REPORTED (by the Head of the School of Life Sciences):
That a new Undergraduate Teaching Committee had been set up for the School and that
this Committee would meet for the first time on 11 November 2010 and would seek to
address the undergraduate concerns expressed in paper BFS.08/10-11
11/10-11
Introduction to the New Academic Registrar
RECEIVED:
An oral report from the Academic Registrar, Dr Mike Glover, on his period in post since the
beginning of October 2010.
REPORTED (by the Academic Registrar):
(a) That the current issues being considered included the implications of the Browne
Review and the Comprehensive Spending Review; the implementation of the Harris
Report; preparations for the REF; understanding University League Tables; and enhancing
the student experience including employability and student feedback.
(b) That he would be happy to engage in a structured dialogue with the Faculty of Science
on areas of concern to the Faculty and that an appropriate forum, such as the Faculty
Board meeting or the Faculty Lunch, should be identified.
REPORTED (by Dr J Cave):
That the Academic Registrar should consider how best to resolve issues between
departments over joint degrees.
REPORTED (by Professor R Ball):
That the Academic Registrar should consider how best to share data held by academic
departments with the University’s central system.
12/10-11
Institute for Advanced Teaching and Learning (IATL)
RECEIVED:
An oral update from the Co-Director of IATL, Dr Paul Taylor, on the launch of IATL in
October 2010 and the opportunities it offers to Departments in the Faculty of Science.
REPORTED:
(a) That 50% of IATL’s total budget of £450,000 was available to University staff and
students on a competitive basis as funding for teaching and learning projects;
(b) That Departments would only need to complete one simple Expression of Interest form
and that there would be one submission deadline per term;
11
(c) That IATL would welcome suggestions from Departments on the thematic areas it
should develop, with those already in development being feedback to students,
interdisciplinarity and internationalization.
13/10-11
Science Faculty Advisory Board
REPORTED :
14/10-11
(a)
That the Vice-Chancellor had written to Mr Ian Schott of Schott Consulting and Dr
Ian McConvey, Principal Scientist at PR&D, AstraZeneca, inviting them to join the
Science Faculty Advisory Board for a renewable period of three years from 1
October 2010 and that Dr McConvey had replied to accept the invitation whilst Mr
Schott had declined the invitation due to other commitments.
(b)
That the next meeting of the Science Faculty Advisory Board would take place on
18 November 2010 at the University of Warwick and that there would be a call for
nominations for new external members of the Advisory Board.
Representation from Faculty Boards on E-Learning Steering Group
CONSIDERED:
Nominations for two members of academic staff from the Faculty of Science to join the ELearning Steering Group, noting that it may be most beneficial for the members of the
group to comprise a mixture of members of staff with an interest or expertise in e-learning
and members with a more general interest in teaching and learning.
RESOLVED:
That the Secretariat would circulate an email to members of the Board asking for
nominations to join the E-Learning Steering Group with the deadline for nominations being
12 noon on 19 November 2010.
15/10-11
Items to be brought to the Senate
CONSIDERED:
Whether there are any specific issues which the Board of the Faculty wished to refer to the
Senate for consideration.
RESOLVED:
That the following items should be brought to the Senate:
(a) The appointment of Professor John McCarthy as a representative from the Board of
the Faculty of Science on the Senate for the period 1 August 2010 to 31 July 2013.
(b) Recommendations for changes to the constitutions of the Board of the Faculty of
Science and the Sub-Faculty of Science.
16/10-11
Freedom of Information
REPORTED :
(a)
That the Steering Committee at its meeting on 29 October 2007 considered a
paper outlining how the Freedom of Information Act 2000 applies to the publication
12
of minutes of University bodies together with the University Publication Scheme
adopted by the Steering Committee in December 2003, paper SC 60/07-08, and
resolved that a standard item be included on the agenda of the first meeting of
each University Committee at the start of each academic year to inform new
members and to remind continuing members of the University policy on the
publication of minutes.
17/10-11
(b)
That all non-reserved minutes and agenda of the Committee are published on the
University’s Governance website at:
http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/gov/atoz/bfs/minutes/
(c)
That copies of paper SC.60/07-08 are available from the Secretary (of the Steering
Committee) on request.
Dates of Future Meetings
REPORTED :
That the future meetings of the Board of the Faculty of Science in the academic year
2010/11 would be held on the following dates:
Spring Term – Wednesday 9 February 2011, 3pm (Council Chamber)
Summer Term – Wednesday 25 May 2011, 2pm (Council Chamber)
SW/BFS/Minutes/10Nov2010
13
Download