College Planning Council (CPC) and Committees Reporting to the CPC
As a member of a Cabrillo College Participatory Governance Committee, your input is requested
annually to help evaluate and improve the effectiveness of Cabrillo's participatory governance
structures, functions and processes. This survey is completely anonymous and confidential. Your
honest responses are greatly appreciated.
1. For which committee are you completing this survey?
(If you serve on more than one of the committees below, please complete a separate survey for each.)
Assessment Review Committee (ARC)
Institutional Effectiveness Committee
Classified Prioritization Committee
Professional Engagement and Transformational Learning
Committee (PETL)
College Planning Council (CPC)
Technology Committee
Facilities Planning Committee (FPAC)
Student Equity and Success Committee
2. For this Committee, how often do (did) you attend meetings this academic year?
I attended all scheduled meetings.
I attended more than 75% of the meetings.
I attended 50-75% of the meetings.
I attended less than half of the meetings.
3. Do you feel you have a clear understanding of this Committee's structure and purpose?
Yes
Somewhat
No
Comments (please specify):
4. Frequency of Meetings:
Annually
Weekly or Bi-Weekly
Quarterly
Ad Hoc (for brief period of time)
Monthly
Other
Other (please specify):
1
5. Agendas
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly
Agree
NA/Don't
Know
1. Agendas and minutes were provided electronically to all
participants prior to all Committee meetings.
2. Agenda items were appropriate for this group at this type of
meeting.
3. The meeting and discussions usually followed the agenda.
6. Meeting Type/Space/Size/Composition
Too Small
Just Right
Too Large
NA/Don't Know
1. The size of the group is appropriate.
2. The meeting room was of appropriate size and arrangement.
7. Is the membership of the committee appropriate to the goals?
Yes
Somewhat
No
How could the composition of the committee be improved?
2
8. Meeting Process
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly
Agree
NA/Don't
Know
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
Agree
Strongly
Agree
NA/Don't
Know
1. The meetings started and finished on time.
2. Time utilization was effective.
3. It was clear who was responsible for carrying out the action
items.
4. Committee members were given adequate information to make
informed recommendations and decisions.
5. Discussions were data-informed and supported by sound
evidence.
6. All members attended regularly.
7. All members were encouraged to be actively involved.
8. Discussions were collegial, and differing opinions were
respected.
9. The Committee charge was understood, and the members
worked toward fulfilling the charge.
10. I regularly communicated with the members of the constituent
group I represented regarding key items discussed and actions
taken during Committee meetings.
11. The Committee has a website with minutes, agendas, and
membership.
9. Facilitator/Recorder
1. The facilitator kept the group focused on the common task.
2. The facilitator kept the meeting moving.
3. The facilitator brought the Committee to closure, agreeing on
action items.
4. The facilitator was effective.
5. The recorder captured the basic ideas of the meeting.
3
10. Please select your constituency group(s).
Adjunct Faculty
Administrator/Manager
Classified/Confidential Staff
Contract Faculty
Governing Board
Student
11. In which College component do you primarily work?
Administrative Services
Instruction
President's Office
Student Services
Other
Other (please specify):
12. Additional Comments:
Thank you for your participation!
4