Checklist: Reviewer
Reviewers are requested to fill in one sheet per exam paper.
Subject: __________________ Level: ______________________ Paper :___________
1. The Rubric
1.1 Rubric is clear and unambiguous.
1.2 Rubric matches the syllabus of the current year for number of sections.
1.3 Rubric matches the syllabus for the number of questions to be answered.
1.4 Rubric matches the syllabus for the length of answers required.
1.5 Rubric matches the syllabus for the language to be used in answers.
1.6 Wording of rubric consistent in different sections.
2. Content
2.1 Questions have been worked out.
2.2 All the constants and relevant information for working problems are given.
2.3 Constants and data given have the correct units.
2.4 Technical terms and symbols conform to current usage.
2.5 The language used is clear and unambiguous for the level involved.
2.6 Alternative questions are of comparable difficulty.
2.7 The length of paper is appropriate for the time available.
2.8 Questions do not contain gender, cultural or religious bias.
2.9 The marks allocated per question and sub-question are appropriate.
2.10 The marks of the paper add up to the total number allocated by the syllabus.
3. Marking Scheme
3.1 Acceptable alternative answers as well as unacceptable answers are given.
3.2 It is clear unambiguous and can be followed easily by markers.
3.3 The allocation of marks to each question is appropriate to its difficulty.
3.4 Marks to be allocated for partial answers are clearly indicated.
4. General Comments by Reviewer
4.1 Are all the questions within the syllabus of the current year? Comment.
4.2 Comment about the spread of syllabus content covered by this paper. (May not be
applicable to languages.)
4.3 Comment on the skills tested by this paper.
4.4 What percentage of the paper is allocated to each skill outlined in the syllabus?
4.5 Other comments about the paper.
Signed:
Reviewer ___________________