Criterion Validity: Reading CTEP Placements
Summary of correlations between CTEP Reading Comprehension Scores and Instructor week #5 evaluations of students' likelihood of success in the course.
The Chancellor's minimum standard is a correlation of +0.35 or greater (i.e. r >= +.35).
Survey Term
Fall
02+03+04 Fall 04 Fall 03 Fall 02
● Placement Level: READ 255
READ-255 Lecture Basic Reading
    r = +.11
r = -.29
r = +.22 r = +.44
N = 61 N = 27 N = 24 N = 10
● Placement Level: READ 205/206(SL)
READ-205 Lecture Intro College Read
READ-206(SL) Laboratory (ESL) Individualized Read
  r = +.57
N = 15 r = +.65
N = 14
   r = +.03 r = -.11 r = -.10
N = 51 N = 26 N = 23
● Placement Level: READ 100/106
READ-100 Lecture College Reading
READ-106 Laboratory Individualized Read
   r = -.08
r = -.42
r = +.46
N= 36 N = 24 N = 12
  r = +.50
r = +.50
N = 7 N = 7
● Placement Level: READ 52
READ-52 Lecture Speed/Comprehension
    r = +.04
r = +.05
r = -.05
r = -.28
N = 73 N = 39 N = 15 N = 19
Symbol Key:
"r" = correlation
"N" = number of students in the analysis
This analysis is limited to those students who:
(1) assessed for the Fall term in which they enrolled,
(2) enrolled in a course consistent with their placement,
(3) had an enrollment status of "1st Time Any College",
(4) had attained a highest education level of High School Diploma,
(5) were members of the current year's graduating High School class,
(6) achieved their placement level without aid of Multiple Measures points and
(7) received an instructor week #5 evaluation.
Cabrillo College Page 1 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 2/22/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Placement: READ 52 Lec/Lab: Lecture Instructor: (All)
Term: Fall 02+03+04 Location: (All)
35
● The correlation between 73 pairs of CTEP Scores & Instructor Evaluations is: 0.042
● That value fails to meet the Chancellor's minimum standard of +0.350
This analysis is limited to those students who: (1) assessed for the Fall term in which they enrolled, (2) enrolled in a course consistent with their placement, (3) had an enrollment status of "1st Time Any College", (4) had attained a highest education level of High School Diploma, (5) were members of the current year's graduating High School class, (6) achieved their placement level without aid of Multiple Measures points and (7) received an instructor week #5 evaluation.
30
25
20
Read 52: CTEP Score 24+
Read 100/106: CTEP Score 19-23
15
10
5
Read 205/206(SL): CTEP Score 14-18
0
1
Read 255: CTEP Scores 0-13
2 3 4
Instructor Evaluation of Student Ability to Succeed (1=Low/5=High)
5
Cabrillo College Planning & Research Office: 2-8-2005 Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Consequential Validity: Reading CTEP Placements
Student Ratings of their Preparedness for the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
(All)
Yes
1st Time Any College
HS Grad
(All)
(All)
(All)
Student evaluation of own preparedness for course
I am Overqualified
I am Qualified ("just barely" to "fully")
I am Not Qualified
Grand Total
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
8.4%
89.2%
2.4%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● All Fall 2002, Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 Reading Assessees
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● Enrollment status for the above term(s) was "1st Time Any College"
● Highest level of education they had attained was a High School Diploma
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● All assessees regardless of whether Multiple Measures Points upgraded their Placement Level
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Placement
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
6.0% 11.4% 8.5% 7 3 5 7
94.0%
0.0%
100.0%
88.6%
0.0%
100.0%
91.5%
0.0%
100.0%
74
2
83
47
50
39
44
75
82
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should feel qualified to be in the course in which they were placed.
● That 75% standard is exceeded at all levels of the placement sequence.
Instructor Ratings of Prospects for Success in the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Instructor evaluation of students' ability
Very Strong Ability (could easily pass)
Intermediate Ability (should/will/may pass)
Very Weak Ability (probably won't pass)
Grand Total
(All)
Yes
1st Time Any College
HS Grad
(All)
(All)
(All)
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
16.0%
82.7%
1.3%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● All Fall 2002, Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 Reading Assessees
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● Enrollment status for the above term(s) was "1st Time Any College"
● Highest level of education they had attained was a High School Diploma
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● All assessees regardless of whether Multiple Measures Points upgraded their Placement Level
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Placement
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
10.2% 8.6% 5.5% 12 9 5 5
85.2%
4.5%
100.0%
81.0%
10.3%
100.0%
92.3%
2.2%
100.0%
62
1
75
75
4
88
47
6
58
84
2
91
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should be rated as having ability sufficient for success in the course.
● That 75% standard is exceeded at all levels of the placement sequence.
Cabrillo College Page 3 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 2/22/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Consequential Validity: Reading CTEP Placements
Student Ratings of their Preparedness for the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
2004FA
Yes
1st Time Any College
HS Grad
(All)
No
(All)
Student evaluation of own preparedness for course
I am Overqualified
I am Qualified ("just barely" to "fully")
I am Not Qualified
Grand Total
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
11.4%
88.6%
0.0%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● Assessed for Reading in the Fall 2004 term
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● Enrollment status for the above term(s) was "1st Time Any College"
● Highest level of education they had attained was a High School Diploma
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Enrolled
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
8.3% 4.2% 5.4% 4 2 1 2
91.7%
0.0%
100.0%
95.8%
0.0%
100.0%
94.6%
0.0%
100.0%
31
35
22
24
23
24
35
37
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should feel qualified to be in the course in which they were placed.
● That 75% standard is exceeded at all levels of the placement sequence.
Instructor Ratings of Prospects for Success in the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Instructor evaluation of students' ability
Very Strong Ability (could easily pass)
Intermediate Ability (should/will/may pass)
Very Weak Ability (probably won't pass)
Grand Total
2004FA
Yes
1st Time Any College
HS Grad
(All)
No
(All)
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
13.3%
86.7%
0.0%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● Assessed for Reading in the Fall 2004 term
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● Enrollment status for the above term(s) was "1st Time Any College"
● Highest level of education they had attained was a High School Diploma
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Enrolled
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
10.9% 7.7% 2.3% 4 5 3 1
89.1%
0.0%
100.0%
79.5%
12.8%
100.0%
95.5%
2.3%
100.0%
26
30
41
46
31
5
39
42
1
44
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should be rated as having ability sufficient for success in the course.
● That 75% standard is exceeded at all levels of the placement sequence.
Cabrillo College Page 4 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 5/5/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Consequential Validity: Reading CTEP Placements
Student Ratings of their Preparedness for the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
(All)
Yes
1st Time Any College
HS Grad
(All)
No
(All)
Student evaluation of own preparedness for course
I am Overqualified
I am Qualified ("just barely" to "fully")
I am Not Qualified
Grand Total
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
8.4%
89.2%
2.4%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● All Fall 2002, Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 Reading Assessees
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● Enrollment status for the above term(s) was "1st Time Any College"
● Highest level of education they had attained was a High School Diploma
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Enrolled
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
6.1% 11.9% 9.0% 7 3 5 7
93.9%
0.0%
100.0%
88.1%
0.0%
100.0%
91.0%
0.0%
100.0%
74
2
83
46
49
37
42
71
78
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should feel qualified to be in the course in which they were placed.
● That 75% standard is exceeded at all levels of the placement sequence.
Instructor Ratings of Prospects for Success in the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Instructor evaluation of students' ability
Very Strong Ability (could easily pass)
Intermediate Ability (should/will/may pass)
Very Weak Ability (probably won't pass)
Grand Total
(All)
Yes
1st Time Any College
HS Grad
(All)
No
(All)
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
16.0%
82.7%
1.3%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● All Fall 2002, Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 Reading Assessees
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● Enrollment status for the above term(s) was "1st Time Any College"
● Highest level of education they had attained was a High School Diploma
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Enrolled
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
9.6% 9.4% 5.8% 12 8 5 5
85.5%
4.8%
100.0%
79.2%
11.3%
100.0%
91.9%
2.3%
100.0%
62
1
75
71
4
83
42
6
53
79
2
86
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should be rated as having ability sufficient for success in the course.
● That 75% standard is exceeded at all levels of the placement sequence.
Cabrillo College Page 5 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 5/5/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Consequential Validity: Reading CTEP Placements
Student Ratings of their Preparedness for the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
(All)
Yes
1st Time Any College
(All)
(All)
No
(All)
Student evaluation of own preparedness for course
I am Overqualified
I am Qualified ("just barely" to "fully")
I am Not Qualified
Grand Total
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
7.5%
90.3%
2.2%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● All Fall 2002, Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 Reading Assessees
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● Enrollment status for the above term(s) was "1st Time Any College"
● All assessees regardless of level of education attained
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Enrolled
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
6.0% 11.4% 8.5% 7 3 5 7
94.0%
0.0%
100.0%
88.6%
0.0%
100.0%
91.5%
0.0%
100.0%
84
2
93
47
50
39
44
75
82
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should feel qualified to be in the course in which they were placed.
● That 75% standard is exceeded at all levels of the placement sequence.
Instructor Ratings of Prospects for Success in the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Instructor evaluation of students' ability
Very Strong Ability (could easily pass)
Intermediate Ability (should/will/may pass)
Very Weak Ability (probably won't pass)
Grand Total
(All)
Yes
1st Time Any College
(All)
(All)
No
(All)
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
14.9%
83.9%
1.1%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● All Fall 2002, Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 Reading Assessees
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● Enrollment status for the above term(s) was "1st Time Any College"
● All assessees regardless of level of education attained
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Enrolled
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
10.3% 9.1% 7.5% 13 9 5 7
83.9%
5.7%
100.0%
80.0%
10.9%
100.0%
90.3%
2.2%
100.0%
73
1
87
73
5
87
44
6
55
84
2
93
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should be rated as having ability sufficient for success in the course.
● That 75% standard is exceeded at all levels of the placement sequence.
Cabrillo College Page 6 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 5/5/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Consequential Validity: Reading CTEP Placements
Student Ratings of their Preparedness for the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
(All)
Yes
(All)
(All)
(All)
No
(All)
Student evaluation of own preparedness for course
I am Overqualified
I am Qualified ("just barely" to "fully")
I am Not Qualified
Grand Total
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
6.4%
90.8%
2.8%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● All Fall 2002, Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 Reading Assessees
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● All assessees regardless of their enrollment status for the above term(s)
● All assessees regardless of level of education attained
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Enrolled
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
10.6% 11.5% 9.9% 7 7 6 10
89.4%
0.0%
100.0%
88.5%
0.0%
100.0%
90.1%
0.0%
100.0%
99
3
109
59
66
46
52
91
101
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should feel qualified to be in the course in which they were placed.
● That 75% standard is exceeded at all levels of the placement sequence.
Instructor Ratings of Prospects for Success in the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Instructor evaluation of students' ability
Very Strong Ability (could easily pass)
Intermediate Ability (should/will/may pass)
Very Weak Ability (probably won't pass)
Grand Total
(All)
Yes
(All)
(All)
(All)
No
(All)
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
12.0%
87.0%
0.9%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● All Fall 2002, Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 Reading Assessees
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● All assessees regardless of their enrollment status for the above term(s)
● All assessees regardless of level of education attained
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Enrolled
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
12.0% 8.6% 8.1% 13 13 6 9
83.3%
4.6%
100.0%
82.9%
8.6%
100.0%
90.1%
1.8%
100.0%
94
1
108
90
5
108
58
6
70
100
2
111
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should be rated as having ability sufficient for success in the course.
● That 75% standard is exceeded at all levels of the placement sequence.
Cabrillo College Page 7 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 5/5/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Consequential Validity: Reading CTEP Placements
Student Ratings of their Preparedness for the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
(All)
(All)
(All)
(All)
No
(All)
No
Student evaluation of own preparedness for course
I am Overqualified
I am Qualified ("just barely" to "fully")
I am Not Qualified
Grand Total
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
15.4%
83.7%
1.0%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● All Fall 2002, Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 Reading Assessees
● Failed to enroll that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● All assessees regardless of their enrollment status for the above term(s)
● All assessees regardless of level of education attained
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Enrolled
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
12.0% 8.3% 0.0% 16 3 1
84.0%
4.0%
100.0%
91.7%
0.0%
100.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
87
1
104
21
1
25
11
12
2
2
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should feel qualified to be in the course in which they were placed.
● Except for READ-52 , that 75% standard is exceeded at all remaining levels of the placement sequence.
● One third (33%) of READ-52 students whose placement was lower than READ-52 felt "overqualified" for the course.
Instructor Ratings of Prospects for Success in the class.
Survey Term
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Instructor evaluation of students' ability
Very Strong Ability (could easily pass)
Intermediate Ability (should/will/may pass)
Very Weak Ability (probably won't pass)
Grand Total
(All)
(All)
(All)
(All)
No
(All)
No
READTEST
CTEP1-RC
Percentages
READ 255
26.6%
71.3%
2.1%
100.0%
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● All Fall 2002, Fall 2003 & Fall 2004 Reading Assessees
● Failed to enroll that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● All assessees regardless of their enrollment status for the above term(s)
● All assessees regardless of level of education attained
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Data Crs Enrolled
Student Counts
READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52 READ 255 READ 205/206(SL) READ 100/106 READ 52
14.3% 17.6% 0.0% 25 4 3
24 3 85.7%
0.0%
100.0%
70.6%
11.8%
100.0%
100.0%
0.0%
100.0%
67
2
94 28
12
2
17 3
● The Chancellor's threshold for an acceptable response is that at least 75% should be rated as having ability sufficient for success in the course.
● READ-205/206 & READ-52 met or exceeded that 75% standard.
● READ-255 failed to meet the standard because instructors felt that a significant proportion of students (whose placement was higher than READ-255) were "overqualified" for the course.
● READ-100/106 failed to meet the standard because instructors felt that a significant proportion of students were either "under qualified" or "over qualified" for the course.
● If Datatel enforced Reading placements (via enrollment blocking), it is possible that the READ-100/106 qualification mismatches could have been attenuated somewhat.
Cabrillo College Page 8 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 5/5/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Student Success Rates.
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Lecture or Lab?
Instructor
Data
Success Rate
Retention Rate
Total Students
Total Success Rate
Total Retention Rate
Yes
(All)
(All)
(All)
No
(All)
(All)
(All)
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● Assessed for Reading in the Fall term indicated
●
●
●
●
●
●
Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
All assessees regardless of their enrollment status for the above term(s)
All assessees regardless of level of education attained
All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Crs Enrolled
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
READ 255
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
READ 255
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
READTESTSurvey Term
CTEP1-RC
2002FA 2003FA 2004FA
50
42
12
42
65%
62
20
46
65%
69
50
48
76%
50%
50%
71%
87%
81%
58%
81%
127
61%
80%
47%
90%
72%
84%
66%
95%
85%
177
63%
79%
48%
42%
54%
94%
71%
68%
81%
217
54%
78%
Grand Total
88%
72%
73%
82%
521
59%
79%
130
173
82
136
69%
48%
55%
65%
Cabrillo College Page 9 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 5/5/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Student Success Rates.
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Data
Success Rate
Retention Rate
Total Students
Total Success Rate
Total Retention Rate
Yes
(All)
(All)
(All)
No
(All)
Crs Enrolled
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
READ 255
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
READ 255
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● Assessed for Reading in the Fall term indicated
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● All assessees regardless of their enrollment status for the above term(s)
● All assessees regardless of level of education attained
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
READTESTSurvey Term
CTEP1-RC
2002FA 2003FA 2004FA
Grand Total
16
18
50%
50%
83%
50%
63%
94%
36
67%
78%
27
11
23
37%
91%
78%
63%
91%
87%
61
62%
77%
20
8
27
30%
67%
50%
50%
85%
55
44%
67%
50%
59%
74%
88%
152
57%
74%
2
63
19
68
50%
38%
53%
75%
Cabrillo College Page 10 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 5/5/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Student Success Rates.
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Data
Success Rate
Retention Rate
Total Students
Total Success Rate
Total Retention Rate
Yes
(All)
(All)
(All)
No
(All)
Crs Enrolled
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
READ 255
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
READ 255
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● Assessed for Reading in the Fall term indicated
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● All assessees regardless of their enrollment status for the above term(s)
● All assessees regardless of level of education attained
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
READTESTSurvey Term
CTEP1-RC
2002FA 2003FA 2004FA
Grand Total
24
63%
23
65%
47
64%
71%
24
63%
71%
83%
23
65%
83%
77%
47
64%
77%
Cabrillo College Page 11 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 5/5/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Student Success Rates.
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Data
Success Rate
Retention Rate
Total Students
Total Success Rate
Total Retention Rate
Yes
(All)
(All)
(All)
No
(All)
Crs Enrolled
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
READ 255
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
READ 255
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 100/106
READ 52
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● Assessed for Reading in the Fall term indicated
● Enrolled that term in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● All assessees regardless of their enrollment status for the above term(s)
● All assessees regardless of level of education attained
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
● Those who achieved their Placement Level without aid of Multiple Measures Points
● All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
READTESTSurvey Term
CTEP1-RC
2002FA 2003FA 2004FA
17
19
12
16 29
30
75%
47%
50%
64%
38%
21
76%
34%
50%
100%
95%
58%
39
54%
85%
85%
63%
49
55%
78%
38%
100%
66%
80%
76%
97
47%
78%
Grand Total
91%
73%
74%
76%
185
51%
79%
58
64
42
21
69%
39%
50%
38%
Cabrillo College Page 12 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 5/5/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.

Consequential Validity: Reading CTEP Placements
Student Ratings of their Preparedness for the class.
Enrolled as Placed?
Enroll Status
Highest Education
Graduated HS this year?
MM Upgrade?
Who Responded?
Lecture or Lab?
Location
Grade
(All)
(All)
(All)
(All)
(All)
(All)
(All)
(All)
(Multiple Items)
The analysis below is limited to only those students who met the following profile:
● Assessed for Reading in the Fall term indicated
● All assessees regardless of whether they enrolled in a Reading course consistent with their Placement Level
● All assessees regardless of their enrollment status for the above term(s)
● All assessees regardless of level of education attained
● All assessees regardless of whether they graduated High School this year
●
●
All assessees regardless of whether Multiple Measures Points upgraded their Placement Level
All students with personal and/or instructor week #5 survey evaluations
Students READTESTSurvey Term
CTEP1-RC
Crs Enrolled
READ 255
Instructor
J. Hanks
2002FA
18
2003FA
72
2004FA
26
READ 255 Total
READ 205/206(SL)
READ 205/206(SL) Total
READ 100/106
READ 100/106 Total
READ 52
READ 52 Total
Grand Total
J. Miles
J. Tuttle
L. Goldstein
M. Soltis
R. Smith
J. Culver
J. Hanks
L. Goldstein
M. Soltis
J. Culver
J. Hanks
M. Soltis
J. Hanks
M. Soltis
P. Camarillo
6
20
24
9
77
6
30
3
36
75
14
14
20
25
45
211
18
12
102
22
20
36
78
12
15
27
25
25
50
257
9
26
19
80
52
290
41
23
27
91
15
36
16
67
22
30
Grand Total
244
27
50
31
108
259
6
93
46
99
22
75
50
147
758
116
6
47
62
9
19
Cabrillo College Page 13 of 13 Planning & Research Office: 2/22/2005
Dick Borden, Ph.D.