CLASSIFIED PRIORITIZATION SUB-COMMITTEE
PILOT
Summary of Changes Requested by CPC
1. Committee Membership
a. Concern that committee membership is too small and there is not enough representation of
stakeholders
Resolution: Increased membership by 1 classified, 1 faculty and 1 student representative.
2. Process Flexibility
a. Concern for turn around time and the urgency sometimes associated with timelines dictated
by grant funded programs and projects.
b. Concern for addressing unforseeen staffing needs in a timely manner
Resolution: Concerns were noted in the “Purpose and Authority” and “Meetings” sections of
the committee’s charter. The language now reflects the flexibility of the committee needing to
meet on an “as needed” basis as well as outside of the planning cycle.
3. Funding Source
a. Concern about the clarity of scope of the prioritzation pilot
Resolution: Funding sources clearly identifie in Process Timeline document as “Funding
Sources that do not include Un-restricted General Funds”.
4. Institutional Priorities
a. List is incomplete
Resolution: Boxes for instruction and students were added.
5. Process Efficiency and Flexibility
Resolution: Concerns were noted in the “Meetings” section of the charter by stating that
decisions will be made by members present at each meeting and recommendations may be sent
to CPC via e-mail if needs arise off-cycle from the scheduled CPC meetings
6. Are Classified hourly positions subject to the classified prioritization process?
No.
7. Are increases in existing positions subject to the classified prioritization process?
Yes.
O:\Administrative Services\VP Administrative Services\Classified Hiring Priorities\2014-15 Classified Hiring Priorities\2014-15 Classified
Prioritization_ summary of changes requested by CPC061914 .docx
Page 1 of 1