OFFICERS' REPORTS TO
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE (EAST) - 8 MAY 2008
Each report for decision on this Agenda shows the Chief Officer responsible, the
recommendation of the Head of Planning and in the case of private business the
paragraph(s) of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972 under which it is
considered exempt. None of the reports have financial, legal or policy implications save
where indicated.
PUBLIC BUSINESS - ITEMS FOR DECISION
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
Note :- Recommendations for approval include a standard time limit condition as Condition
No.1, unless otherwise stated.
1.
AYLMERTON - 20080300 - Erection of two-storey dwelling; site adjoining Breck
Lodge Holt Road for Westcrome Properties Limited
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :24 Apr 2008
Case Officer :Mrs T Armitage
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
Corridor of Movement
Countryside
Residential
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
20061114 - (Full Planning Permission) - Erection of two-storey dwelling
Refused, 06 Sep 2006
20070557 - (Full Planning Permission) - Erection of two-storey dwelling
Withdrawn, 24 May 2007
THE APPLICATION
Erection of a detached two-storey dwelling with integral double garage on a site of
0.19ha. Traditional facing materials are proposed (brick and flint). The site would be
accessed from a section of "stopped-up" carriageway which runs parallel to and
connects with the A148.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
Deferred at the last meeting for a site visit.
PARISH COUNCIL
Raise a number of observations in relation to discrepancies between Design and
Access Statement and plans; need to ensure that privacy to neighbours is not lost
and lack of information regarding materials (Appendix 1).
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - The Holt Road (A148) is a designated Corridor of
Movement and a Principal Route in the Norfolk County Council route Hierarchy.
As such a Corridor of Movement, the section of A148 to which this proposal will
access, is protected from any development that will interfere with the principal
function of carrying traffic freely and safely between centres of population.
Development Control Committee (East)
1
8 May 2008
The site is accessed from a section of 'stopped up' carriageway which presently
serves directly some five or six dwellings. The access road is so aligned with the
A148 that a vehicle approaching its junction with the A148 from the east is unaware
of its existence until practically upon the junction and consequently the right turn
manoeuvre into this road, where no right hand turn facilities whatsoever exist, is
extremely hazardous. This concern is exacerbated by the alignment of the
carriageway at this point which restricts forward visibility for a driver approaching a
right turning vehicle from the east.
The level of forward visibility is approximately 120m with the requirement for this
section of the A148 which is subject to a 50mph speed limit being 160m (Department
of Transport advice note TD/93 Highway Link Design June 1993 and as amended).
Furthermore within 500m of the application site there have been three accidents in
recent years clearly indicating that the section of Holt Road (A148) onto which the
access is positioned has a poor accident record. The alignment of the carriageway
and the vehicular speeds being considered the main reason for these accidents. To
introduce any such additional slowing, stopping and turning vehicles at this location
will inevitably introduce further danger to this section of the A148.
According to TRICS database (Trip Rate Information Computer Services Version
2005b) a residential dwelling will typically generate 8-10 vehicular trips per day.
Therefore must strongly object to this application.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
It is considered that refusal of this application as recommended may have an impact
on the individual Human Rights of the applicant. However, having considered the
likely impact and the general interest of the public, refusal of the application is
considered to be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 4: Selected Small Villages (small-scale residential development should
enhance character).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 146: Corridors of Movement (direct access not permitted except for roadside
services).
Policy 147: New Accesses (developments which would endanger highway safety not
permitted).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Principle of development.
2. Design and form of development.
3. Highway safety.
APPRAISAL
The application was deferred at the previous meeting to enable Members to visit the
site.
Development Control Committee (East)
2
8 May 2008
The site lies in part within the settlement boundary of Aylmerton and entirely within
the Norfolk Coast Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. There is existing built
development on either side of the site. In such locations the principle of small scale
residential development is acceptable in policy terms, subject to proposals enhancing
the character of the village and the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and
complying with more detailed assessment criteria set out elsewhere in the Plan.
The detached two-storey property is proposed at the southern road frontage end of
the plot and entirely within the settlement boundary. The property would have a
substantial rear garden of approximately 50m in length which would extend beyond
the settlement boundary. The proposed property is of traditional design and form and
consistent with the scale and character of adjacent properties. Space would be
maintained between the proposed dwelling and the boundaries with the neighbouring
properties of between 2m and 6m. Primary windows are indicated on the main, north
and south, elevations of the property, substantially mitigating any adverse impact on
the amenities of neighbouring occupiers.
The development would rely on access on to the Holt Road (A148), which is
designated as a Corridor of Movement and Principal Route in the Norfolk County
Council Route Hierarchy. Local Plan policy seeks to protect Corridors of Movement
from development which would interfere with the principal function of carrying traffic
freely and safely. The Highway Authority has raised an objection to this proposal on
this basis as well as the hazardous alignment of the access road with the A148 and
the accident record in the vicinity of the site.
In view of the highway objection, refusal is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION:- REFUSE, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:1) The proposed development would intensify the use of an existing access on a
stretch of classified highway (Holt Road A148) where the principal use is that of
carrying traffic freely and safely between centres of population. The existence of an
access in this location is a matter of fact and therefore some degree of conflict and
interference to the passage of through vehicles already occurs, but the material
increase in slowing, stopping and turning movements that this proposal would
engender would lead to the deterioration in the efficiently of the through road as a
traffic carrier and be detrimental to highway safety, in conflict with North Norfolk Local
Plan Policy 146.
2) The proposed development, if permitted, would lead to an increase in right hand
turning movements across the opposing traffic stream of a Principal Route/Corridor
of Movement (Holt Road A148) at a position where the forward visibility for
approaching drivers and the position of the junction of the access road with the A148
makes such a manoeuvre an interference with the free and safe flow of traffic and
additionally would cause danger and inconvenience to highway users, in conflict with
North Norfolk Local Plan Policy 146.
Development Control Committee (East)
3
8 May 2008
2.
BACTON - 20080322 - Demolition of dwelling and garage and erection of three
dwellings and garages; Hill Top Mill Lane for E Anglian Property/Poppyfields
Ltd
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :28 Apr 2008
Case Officer :Mr Thompson/Mr Took
(Outline Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Residential
Selected Small Village
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
20071617 - (Outline Planning Permission) - Demolition of dwelling and erection of
three dwellings and formation of vehicular access
Refused, 07 Dec 2007
20071962 - (Outline Planning Permission) - Demolition of dwelling and erection of
two dwellings
Approved, 21 Jan 2008
THE APPLICATION
Demolition of detached bungalow and erection of two dwellings fronting Coast Road
and a third fronting Mill Road. Details of access and siting included for determination
at this stage.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
At the request of Councillor Smith having regard to the following planning issue:
Overdevelopment of limited site.
PARISH COUNCIL
Object. Same reasons as earlier application for three dwellings was objected to:1. Plot is too small to accommodate three dwellings.
2. Proposal would spoil outlook from neighbours' conservatory.
3. Poor access.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 4: Selected Small Villages (small-scale residential development should
enhance character).
Policy 6: Residential Areas (areas primarily for residential purposes).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 147: New Accesses (developments which would endanger highway safety not
permitted).
Development Control Committee (East)
4
8 May 2008
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Impact on character of village.
2. Impact on adjacent dwellings.
APPRAISAL
This application proposes the demolition of a single prefabricated type bungalow and
redevelopment by way of three detached single-storey dwellings. The site plan
indicates two of the dwellings fronting and being accessed off the main Walcott
Road, with the third dwelling to the rear served off Mill Road, a private road which
currently serves the existing property. The site lies within the settlement boundary of
Bacton where the principle of small scale residential development is acceptable
subject to proposals enhancing the character of the village and complying with more
detailed assessment criteria.
This proposal differs from a previous scheme for three dwellings that was refused
last year in that the proposed dwellings are of a different design and are sited
significantly further back on the plot, providing a better relationship with the
neighbouring dwelling and the street scene generally.
The site layout indicates that the dwellings can be sited on a similar building line to a
recently approved scheme for two dwellings, albeit forward of the existing bungalow.
The proposed arrangement would maintain 10m rear gardens in accordance with the
basic amenity criteria and is considered to be in keeping with the general character of
the area.
In conclusion, it is considered that the proposal complies with the requirements of the
Development Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:CONDITIONS:-
APPROVE,
SUBJECT
TO
THE
FOLLOWING
2) These reserved matters shall relate to the appearance, landscaping and scale of
the proposed development and this condition shall apply notwithstanding any
indications as to these matters which have been given in the current application.
3) This permission is granted in accordance with the amended plans (drawing
number 07.2456.107.01 Rev B) received by the Local Planning Authority on 18
January 2008, unless otherwise first agreed in writing by the Local Planning
Authority.
4) Notwithstanding the provision of Class A of Schedule 2, Part 2 of the Town and
Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995, (or any Order
revoking, amending or re-enacting that Order) no gate shall be erected across the
approved access unless details have first been submitted to and approved in writing
by the Local Planning Authority.
5) Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby permitted the vehicular
access from Walcott Road shall be constructed in accordance with the Norfolk
County Council residential access construction specification for the first 5m into the
site as measured back from the near edge of the adjacent carriageway.
6) Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby permitted the proposed
access and on-site parking and turning areas shall be laid out and surfaced in
accordance with the approved plan. They shall be retained thereafter for those
specific uses.
Development Control Committee (East)
5
8 May 2008
REASONS:2) The application is submitted in outline form only and the details required are
pursuant to the provisions of Article 3(1) to the Town and Country Planning (General
Development Procedure) Order 1995 and the Town and Country Planning (General
Development Procedure) (Amendment) (England) Order 2006.
3) To ensure the satisfactory layout and appearance of the development in
accordance with Policy 13 of the adopted North Norfolk Local Plan.
4) To ensure safe access to the site in accordance with Policy 147 of the adopted
North Norfolk Local Plan.
5) To ensure satisfactory access into the site, in accordance with Policy 147 of the
adopted North Norfolk Local Plan.
6) To ensure the permanent availability of the parking and manoeuvring area, in the
interests of highway safety, and in accordance with Policy 147 of the adopted North
Norfolk Local Plan.
3.
COLBY - 20080167 - Conversion and extension of outbuilding to provide
additional living accommodation; Sunnyside Farm Colby Corner for Mr and
Mrs Duncan
Target Date :28 Mar 2008
Case Officer :Mr Thompson/Mr Took
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Countryside
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
20051436 - (Full Planning Permission) - Conversion and extension of barn to provide
additional living accommodation
Approved, 24 Oct 2005
THE APPLICATION
Conversion of barn attached to house to provide additional living accommodation
(amended version of previously approved scheme) and extension of barn to provide
garden room/study in place of timber/corrugated sheeting former poultry shed.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
The application was deferred at a previous meeting of the Committee.
PARISH COUNCIL
Support - the Council is aware that this application will be determined by the Planning
Committee, since one of the applicants is employed by the District Council. It was
unanimously agreed that the proposals fulfilled the requirements of Local Plan Policy
29 - the re-use and adaptation of buildings in the countryside, and the Council was
impressed with the "green" credentials of the application. The applicants had
committed to the installation of owl boxes. The Council noted that an earlier
application had suggested bat activity in the immediate area, and ask that a wildlife
survey should be part of any permission granted. On this basis, the Council supports
the proposals.
CONSULTATIONS
Norfolk Landscape Archaeology - Suggest that the age of the farmstead dates back
to 1819 or earlier is of historic interest and that the proposed scheme may not be in
keeping with a 19th century farm. A programme of archaeological work is requested
including a historic building recording.
Development Control Committee (East)
6
8 May 2008
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 5: The Countryside (prevents general development in the countryside with
specific exceptions).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 29: The Reuse and Adaptation of Buildings in the Countryside (specifies
criteria for converting buildings. Prevents residential conversion unless adjacent to a
settlement boundary).
Policy 64: Extensions to Dwellings in the Countryside (specifies design criteria.
Extensions should be subordinate to original dwelling).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Conversion of the farm building into ancillary residential accommodation.
2. Scale/design of the extensions.
APPRAISAL
This application was deferred to enable Members to visit the site.
Sunnyside Farm comprises a farmhouse and attached agricultural storage buildings
accessed via a quiet lane leading to Colby Corner. The site is situated within the
Countryside policy area where alterations to existing properties through
conversion/extension are subject to Policies 29 and 64 of the North Norfolk Local
Plan.
The proposal includes two elements, firstly, the conversion of the existing attached
farm buildings into residential accommodation and, secondly, a single-storey
extension to the front of building and a double garage to the side.
The principle of the conversion of the farm buildings has previously been agreed by
the granting of permission 20051436.
The current proposal is in effect an alternative design solution which allows the
cottage and barn to remain largely unaltered. The proposed garden room, which
would replace an existing outshoot on the barn and a dilapidated timber building, is
designed in a modern style with a glazed southern elevation and a gently sloping
sedum roof. This style of development would also link the attached double garage
and side extension. This arrangement would result in a very similar footprint to the
existing buildings, including the garage that was previously approved as a detached
building.
Development Control Committee (East)
7
8 May 2008
The agent's Design and Access Statement says that the mixture of seamless and low
profile glazing will encourage the walls to be recessive allowing the grass roof to float
and reduce the visual impact of the walls. This concept and design details are
considered appropriate in this situation and taking into account the previously
approved scheme, the application is considered acceptable and in accordance with
the Local Plan policies.
In terms of the scale of the proposed extension, the use of the existing barn and the
creation of a double garage were accepted by the 2005 permission. That permission
also allowed the construction of a front extension of 33sq.m ground area. The current
front extension would cover a ground area of approximately 40sq.m and whilst this is
slightly larger the design means that if anything the potential impact of the latest
proposal in the landscape would be much reduced. The proposal is therefore
considered to comply with the criteria of Policy 64 in a similar way to that of the
approved extension.
Accordingly the proposal is considered to accord with Development Plan policy.
RECOMMENDATION:Approve subject to a condition requiring a programme of archaeological work.
4.
CROMER - 20080117 - Erection of thirteen single-storey dwellings; land at
Burnt Hills for A G Brown Builders Ltd
MAJOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :23 Apr 2008
Case Officer :Mr Thompson/Mr Took
(Outline Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
Residential
THE APPLICATION
To construct an estate road and thirteen dwellings on an area of paddock between
Burnt Hills and Roughton Road, details of access and layout are included for
consideration at this stage. In terms of the scale of the development proposed
indicative details originally supplied showed four bungalows, a pair of semi-detached
houses, two pairs of semi-detached cottages and three detached houses, with the
houses along the western side of the site and the bungalows towards the eastern
(Burnt Hills) side of the site.
Amended plans have since been received revising the proposals to single-storey
dwellings only and incorporating revised highway details.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
This application was deferred at a previous meeting of the Committee.
TOWN COUNCIL
No objection in principle to number of dwellings proposed. However, concerned
about close proximity to existing buildings and to mature trees, and about loss of light
to existing properties. This area consists of bungalows only, could present proposal
be re-designed for bungalows only.
Comments on amended proposals awaited.
Development Control Committee (East)
8
8 May 2008
REPRESENTATIONS
Letters received from 18 local residents expressing concern about:1. Juxtaposition of two-storey properties with existing bungalows.
2. The number of dwellings.
3. The additional traffic.
4. The type and size of housing.
5. The impact on the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, on wildlife and on trees on
the adjoining site.
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - No objections subject to conditions.
Community Safety Manager - Makes detailed suggestions about design measures to
minimise crime.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
Refer to the Community Safety Manager's comments above.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 2: Small Towns (potential for growth subject to compatibility with existing
character).
Policy 6: Residential Areas (areas primarily for residential purposes).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Layout and density of development.
2. Type of housing proposed.
3. Highway safety.
4. Crime prevention.
APPRAISAL
This application was deferred at the last meeting for re-consultation on amended
plans and to enable Members to visit the site.
The site lies within the settlement boundary for Cromer and within a defined
residential area. It also lies within the historic boundary of the designated Area of
Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). This said, the whole of the Burnt Hills estate
lies within the AONB and as such this infill development would not affect the
appearance or character of the AONB. Residential development of the site would
therefore be acceptable in principle. The application proposes 13 dwellings on
0.47ha - a density of 27 dwellings per hectare which is below the Government's
recommended minimum density of 30 dwellings per hectare. This density is
considered to be an acceptable compromise between the need to make optimal use
of land and the need to safeguard the low density suburban character of the area.
Development Control Committee (East)
9
8 May 2008
The application has been amended to provide for single-storey dwellings only on the
site, reflecting the nature of the surrounding properties. In order to achieve this the
garden areas of some of the units have been reduced to slightly below the 10m
minimum recommended in the Design Guide. The general character and density of
the amended proposal now accords very closely with those of the surrounding
development.
The site has a frontage of 35m to the existing estate road, sufficient to form a
properly designed estate road junction and with appropriate visibility splays.
Amended plans have since been submitted which overcome concerns originally
expressed by the Highway Authority who now raise no objections subject to the
imposition of conditions.
Photographs of the trees beyond the south-western boundary of the site, and an
aerial photograph with superimposed block plan demonstrate that the proposal would
have no significant adverse impact on the neighbouring trees.
The proposal is considered to comply with the policies of the Development Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:Approval subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions.
5.
CROMER - 20080308 - Erection of penthouse apartment; Marine View
Promenade for Mr P Mills
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :25 Apr 2008
Case Officer :Mrs T Armitage
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Archaeological Site
Conservation Area
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
20071805 - (Full Planning Permission) - Erection of first floor flat and penthouse
apartment
Withdrawn, 07 Jan 2008
THE APPLICATION
The proposed two-bedroom apartment would be created through the alteration to the
roof of this three-storey building. The proposal includes the installation of dormer
windows and the heightening of the gable walls. An external stair to the rear of the
building would provide access to the apartment.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
Deferred at a previous meeting.
TOWN COUNCIL
Object very strongly. Refer to covenants regarding the cliff face and height of Marine
View relative to The Crescent.
Development Control Committee (East)
10
8 May 2008
REPRESENTATIONS
Twenty-one letters of objection (including one from the Marine View Association of
Residents and Shopkeepers) raising issues regarding the freehold/leasehold
arrangement and the terms of the lease. Other objections refer to the adverse effect
the proposal would have upon the character of the adjacent listed buildings on The
Crescent and the views they enjoy as well as the detrimental impact on the character
of the Conservation Area. Additional objections include lack of disabled access and
lack of parking.
CONSULTATIONS
Conservation, Design and Landscape Manager (Conservation and Design) Comments that the building dates from 1830 and has been much changed over the
last 180 years. It is a key building on the promenade, and one of only four located on
the seafront itself. It received a repair grant in 2004. Commenting on the proposed
scheme; access arrangements to the penthouse seem awkward and there is some
concern about the relationship of the oriel/bay windows to the eaves of the roof.
Ideally the bays should reach to the eaves on the roof's pitch should be steepened to
meet the top of the bays. Overall however the proposed alterations and extensions
are acceptable in principle and will safeguard the building for the future, so that it
continues to make a positive contribution to the Conservation Area.
Coast Defence Engineer - Comments that in this location the flint retaining wall is
covered with vegetation and the physical characteristics cannot be clearly seen, but
in principle sees no reason why the wall cannot be adapted and strengthened locally
to accommodate the construction of the staircase (although disagrees with the actual
dimensions shown on the small submitted plan).
Offers the comment that possibly the construction of a footbridge access from the
adjacent higher level footpath may offer a less complicated engineering solution with
considerably better and safer pedestrian and disabled access.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 2: Small Towns (potential for growth subject to compatibility with existing
character).
Policy 7: Town and Large Village Centres (broad range of development/uses
encouraged).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 42: Development in Conservation Areas (developments should preserve or
enhance character).
Policy 61: Conversion into Flats (specifies criteria in terms of location, size,
amenities, highway safety).
Development Control Committee (East)
11
8 May 2008
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Principle of residential development.
2. Design and form of alterations.
3. Impact on neighbouring properties.
APPRAISAL
This application was deferred at the last meeting for further investigation into the
possibility of providing internal access to the flat; for the views of the Council's
Coastal Protection Section to be sought and to await the response of the Town
Council.
Marine View comprises a three storey building set into the base of the cliffs to the
west of The Gangway. The building dates back to the early 19th century and the
Design and Access Statement submitted with the application describes the historical
background and development of the building (Appendix 2). The building, which is in
mixed use (commercial and residential), lies within the designated town centre for
Cromer and within the Conservation Area. The premises front directly onto the
Promenade which is listed, together with the cliff face to the rear.
The application seeks an additional residential apartment within the altered roof
space of the building. The principle of new residential in this location is acceptable
and despite the coastal position of the development there are no issues of either
flood risk or coastal erosion. The proposed flat exceeds the minimum floor space
standards set out in Policy 61 although in common with the other flats within the
building it would have no off-street parking or external amenity space. Given the town
centre location of the site this is considered acceptable.
The property is proposed to be accessed via an external staircase to the rear of the
building. The staircase would extend from a level which currently provides access to
the two existing second floor flats. Excavation of the cliff would be required to locate
the staircase in the position proposed and Members' attention is drawn to the
comments of the Council's Coast Defence Engineer.
The existing shallow pitched roof is an unsympathetic modern addition to the building
added in the early 1960s. The proposal seeks to replace this roof form with a
conventional slate tiled roof incorporating lead sheathed dormer style windows. The
new roof would be comparable to its original form in the 19th century. The ridge
height would be increased by approximately 1.8m. In terms of design Members will
note that the Conservation, Design and Landscape Manager considers that with the
extension, the building would continue to make a positive contribution to the
Conservation Area.
Whilst the height of the roof would increase the bulk of the building when viewed from
nearby properties on The Crescent and the upper pedestrian footpath, its resulting
impact would not have a detrimental impact on public amenity.
In response to Members' request at the last meeting the agent has submitted more
details as why access to the flat is proposed by an external staircase (Appendix 2).
It is considered that the proposal is compliant with the relevant policies of the
Development Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:Approval subject to appropriate conditions.
Development Control Committee (East)
12
8 May 2008
6.
CROMER - 20080469 - Conversion of six flats to nine flats; 43 Church Street for
Mr J Barron
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :20 May 2008
Case Officer :Mr Thompson/Mr Took
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Core Retail Area
Town Centre
Conservation Area
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
19981683 - (Full Planning Permission) - Change of use from shop and three
residential units to shop and seven residential units
Approved, 01 Feb 1999
20071129 - (Full Planning Permission) - Conversion of upper floors to four residential
flats
Approved, 05 Oct 2007
20071757 - (Full Planning Permission) - Conversion of six flats to ten flats
Refused, 04 Jan 2008
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
At the request of Councillor Cabbell Manners having regard to the following planning
issue:
Density of development.
TOWN COUNCIL
Objects. Overcrowding and concerns about infrastructure and parking.
REPRESENTATIONS
Explanatory statement from agents attached as Appendix 3.
CONSULTATIONS
Environmental Health - Recommends condition requiring details of bin storage.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 7: Town and Large Village Centres (broad range of development/uses
encouraged).
Development Control Committee (East)
13
8 May 2008
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 42: Development in Conservation Areas (developments should preserve or
enhance character).
Policy 61: Conversion into Flats (specifies criteria in terms of location, size,
amenities, highway safety).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Density of development.
2. Adequacy of external amenity areas.
APPRAISAL
No.43 Church Street is a substantial terraced property in the centre of Cromer
comprising a cafe on the ground floor and flats on the three upper floors. Access to
the flats is by a doorway adjacent to the shop front and there is a narrow rear access
into a small rear yard which also contains a detached building in residential use.
Local Plan Policy 61 seeks to achieve adequate internal space, external amenity
space and appropriate drying areas and bin storage for premises converted in to
flats. An earlier application for ten flats was refused on the grounds that it
represented an over-intensive development of the site and that the outlook from
some of the windows of habitable rooms was severely restricted.
Although expressed as a conversion of six flats to nine, in practice four of the flats in
the rear part of the building remain unchanged from how they were permitted in
1999. The main change is in the front part of the building facing Church Street where
currently there are two large flats, one of them - flat 5 - having five bedrooms spread
across two floors. The application proposes creating five one-bedroom flats out of
these two large flats.
The current proposal reduces the number of new units by one and re-configures the
conversion so as to increase the size of the units so that they would be well above
the 22sq.m minimum specified in Policy 61. The smallest flat would have an area
31sq.m gross, 26sq.m net, and the remainder would have 33sq.m to 36sq.m net floor
areas. The proposal now complies with the relevant internal space standards. The
external amenity space is limited in extent but would be shared by fewer flats than
was the case with the previous application. The application includes proposals to
provide a drying area and wall mounted cycle racks within the rear courtyard, as well
as refuse storage facilities adjacent to the rear access.
The proposal does not incorporate any parking facility owing to the limited size of the
site outside the building, but current standards do not require this provision in the
Town Centre.
Granting permission is considered to comply with Development Plan policy.
RECOMMENDATION:Approve, subject to appropriate conditions.
Development Control Committee (East)
14
8 May 2008
7.
DILHAM - 20080380 - Erection of one-and-a-half-storey dwelling; Cleavers
Broad Fen Lane for Mr and Mrs Cowburn
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :06 May 2008
Case Officer :Miss C Ketteringham
(Outline Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Countryside
THE APPLICATION
Details of layout and means of access are included for determination. Plans of a
potential dwelling design have been included with the application but are indicative
only.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
At the request of Councillor Walker having regard to the following planning issue:
The site is part of a group of buildings and would cause no harm to the character of
the countryside.
PARISH COUNCIL
Supports.
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - Objects - The highway network is unsuitable to cater for
additional vehicle movements and is restricted for emergency vehicles. Broad Fen
Lane is only 3.1m and therefore only suitable for single file traffic. Visibility at the
nearby road junctions for access and egress to Broad Fen Lane are very poor. The
junction of Broad Fen Lane and Oak Road is restricted in the critical direction (28m)
and non-traffic direction (24m). The junction of Staithe Lane and Horning Road is
blind in the southerly direction because of the adjacent bridge parapet.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
It is considered that refusal of this application as recommended may have an impact
on the individual Human Rights of the applicant. However, having considered the
likely impact and the general interest of the public, refusal of the application is
considered to be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 5: The Countryside (prevents general development in the countryside with
specific exceptions).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 147: New Accesses (developments which would endanger highway safety not
permitted).
Development Control Committee (East)
15
8 May 2008
North Norfolk Core Strategy (Submission Document):
Policy SS2: Development in the Countryside (prevents general development in the
countryside with specific exceptions).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Housing development in the countryside.
2. Highway safety.
APPRAISAL
The site is located on Broad Fen Lane within a small group of dwellings but is outside
the village development boundary and within the Countryside policy area. Proposals
for new dwellings in such areas are contrary to policy unless for a proven agricultural
or forestry need. No such justification has been put forward in support of this
application.
Cleavers has a long side garden fronting Broad Fen Lane and the building plot would
be formed by the subdivision of the end of the garden leaving adequate space in the
intervening gap for a further plot. Granting planning permission in this case could
prejudice the Council's housing strategy in the adopted Local Plan and emerging
Core Strategy.
The surrounding highway network consists of narrow, single track lanes with severely
restricted visibility at the emerging road junctions and is not suitable to cater for any
intensification of use. For this reason, the Highway Authority is opposed to this
application.
In conclusion, the proposal is clearly contrary to Development Plan policy and is also
objected to by the Highway Authority. Therefore refusal is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION:- REFUSE, FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS:1) The District Council adopted the North Norfolk Local Plan on 2 April 1998 for all
planning purposes. The following saved policies as listed in the Direction issued by
Government Office for the East of England on 14 September 2007 are considered
relevant to the proposed development:
Policy 5: The Countryside
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development
Policy 147: New Accesses
In the opinion of the Local Planning Authority the proposed dwelling is contrary to the
aims and objectives of the above policies by reason of the site's location in an area of
countryside as designated in the North Norfolk Local Plan and outside any area
selected for new residential development. The proposal would also be prejudicial to
the District Council's development strategy which is designed to impose severe
restraint upon new residential development in the countryside in order to direct
housing growth to specific and sustainable locations.
Furthermore, the unclassified road serving the site is inadequate to serve the
development by reason of its poor alignment, restricted width and severely restricted
levels of visibility at adjacent road junctions. Consequently, the proposal does not
accord with the above policy as it is considered detrimental to highway safety.
Development Control Committee (East)
16
8 May 2008
8.
HAPPISBURGH - 20080484 - Construction of one unit of holiday
accommodation; Church Farm Barns Blacksmiths Lane for Mr and Mrs Munday
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :22 May 2008
Case Officer :Mrs T Armitage
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Undeveloped Coast
Countryside
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
20031738 - (Full Planning Permission) - Change of use of redundant agricultural
buildings to four units of holiday accommodation and ancillary recreation area
Approved, 15 Dec 2003
20040270 - (Full Planning Permission) - Variation of planning permission 20031738
to provide swimming pool, sauna and changing rooms in place of approved
recreation room
Approved, 15 Apr 2004
20040764 - (Full Planning Permission) - Conversion of former forge and cart shed to
two units of holiday accommodation and change of use of land to form residential
curtilage
Approved, 11 Mar 2005
THE APPLICATION
Construction of one unit of holiday accommodation on the site of former pigsties
associated with Church Farm Barns. The proposed works include the retention of an
existing full height brick and flint wall and the construction of new brick and flint walls
and new roof. The holiday accommodation would be designed to provide a specialist
self-catering holiday cottage for guests with mobility, visual or hearing impairments.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
At the request of Councillor Walker having regard to the following planning issue:
Benefits of proposal on local economy need to be weighed against Policy 29 issues.
PARISH COUNCIL
Object. Contrary to current policy.
APPRAISAL
Applicants' Design and Access Statement is attached at Appendix 4.
The applicants in support of their application have highlighted that the
accommodation would provide specialist holiday facilities for guests with mobility,
visual or hearing problems and would meet the highest levels of NAS accreditation.
Norfolk Holiday Country Cottages, through which the existing self catering units are
let, have confirmed that they have no such accommodation in Norfolk and Visit
Britain is only aware of one property being available within the County. The applicant
also highlights the findings of the North Norfolk District Council Tourism Sector Study
which highlighted that the District has a very low level of provision that can cater for
people with disabilities.
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - Aware that visibility at the access to this site is limited,
however, given the previous and established use of the site, and that approval of this
proposal could engender a potential reduction in vehicular movements, unable to
Development Control Committee (East)
17
8 May 2008
offer an objection from a highways aspect. Also aware that approval of this proposal
would round off development at this site.
Recommends standard car parking conditions if the application is to be approved.
Environmental Health - Awaiting comments.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
It is considered that refusal of this application as recommended may have an impact
on the individual Human Rights of the applicant. However, having considered the
likely impact and the general interest of the public, refusal of the application is
considered to be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 5: The Countryside (prevents general development in the countryside with
specific exceptions).
Policy 29: The Reuse and Adaptation of Buildings in the Countryside (specifies
criteria for converting buildings. Prevents residential conversion unless adjacent to a
settlement boundary).
Policy 126: Permanent Holiday Accommodation (to be treated the same as new
residential development, except in cases of re-using existing buildings).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Principle of the development.
2. Design and form.
APPRAISAL
The site lies within the curtilage of an established group of self catering holiday units
known as Church Farm Barns. The site is located within areas designated as
Countryside and Undeveloped Coast in the Local Plan.
The site comprises a derelict structure which formerly was used as a pigsty. Little of
the original structure remains other than two sections of full height external wall. The
structure has no roof and other remaining walls are at low level. The proposed
holiday unit would be constructed utilising the full height existing walls with new build
elsewhere. The Design and Access Statement acknowledges that the proposal does
not comply with Policy 29 of the Development Plan given the substantial amount of
new build necessary. Policy 126 of the Development Plan does not allow for new
build holiday accommodation in the Countryside policy area and as such the
proposal if permitted would constitute a departure from adopted planning policy.
Despite the applicants' representations the Countryside policies contained in the
Development Plan have established a strong presumption against new build
unserviced accommodation and to approve this proposal would prejudice this policy
of protecting rural areas from development pressure.
RECOMMENDATION:Refuse on grounds that the development is contrary to Local Plan Policies 5,
29 and 126.
Development Control Committee (East)
18
8 May 2008
9.
HICKLING - 20080366 - Demolition of garage/workshop and erection of four
two-storey dwellings; Andrews Garage/Bay Cottage The Green for Mr J
Andrews and Ms S Blaxell
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :05 May 2008
Case Officer :Mr Thompson/Mr Took
(Outline Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Residential
Selected Small Village
Flood Zone 3
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
19961464 - (Full Planning Permission) - Extension to provide mot testing bay
Approved, 14 Jan 1997
20040355 - (Full Planning Permission) - Erection of engineering workshop
Refused, 28 Apr 2004
20041453 - (Full Planning Permission) - Erection of engineering workshop
Refused, 07 Oct 2004
Appeal Dismissed, 25 May 2005
THE APPLICATION
To demolish a vehicle repair garage and construct a group of four two-storey
dwellings on the site and lead to the side and rear of an adjoining property, Bay
Cottage. The application only includes access to be determined at this stage but
includes indicative details of the site layout and 'typical' elevations. This shows two
dwellings facing onto the street on a comparable building line to Bay Cottage and two
houses at the rear of the site served by a private access road.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
At the request of Councillor Stockton having regard to the following planning issue:
The local objections about loss of a village facility.
PARISH COUNCIL
Object. For the good of the village we must try and encourage business premises to
remain.
REPRESENTATIONS
Letters from four local residents predominantly concerned about loss of garage.
Supporting letter from applicants explains pressures leading to closure of the garage
(Appendix 5).
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - Suggests minor re-siting of access to optimise visibility,
but otherwise raises no objections
Environment Agency - Has accepted that there is no flood risk issue here and that
the submitted flood risk assessment demonstrates that the site is in Flood Zone 1 lowest risk of flooding. Final comments awaited.
Development Control Committee (East)
19
8 May 2008
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 4: Selected Small Villages (small-scale residential development should
enhance character) (development should be compatible with character).
Policy 6: Residential Areas (areas primarily for residential purposes).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 147: New Accesses (developments which would endanger highway safety not
permitted).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Loss of existing garage.
2. Flood risk.
3. Form of development.
APPRAISAL
The site lies within the defined settlement boundary for Hickling where new
residential development is acceptable in principle. Part of the site is currently a
vehicle repair garage, although the whole site is shown as residential area on the
Local Plan inset map. The commercial use is not protected by any employment
designation in the Local Plan and there is therefore no requirement to safeguard the
use. Whilst the loss of any services from a village is to be regretted the applicant's
letter explains the economic pressures which are damaging the viability of the use. In
principle therefore the redevelopment for other purposes is considered acceptable.
Although the site (and most of the village) is shown as Flood Zone 3 (High Risk) on
the Environment Agency's flood maps, the applicants have submitted a Flood Risk
Assessment which has been accepted by the Environment Agency that
demonstrates that the site is in fact in Flood Zone 1 (low probability of flooding where
all uses of land are appropriate). Consequently there is no reason on flood risk
grounds to prevent development here.
The form of development proposed, two-storey houses, with two sited on the
frontage where they would contribute positively to the street scene, and with two at
the rear of the site, would represent a visual enhancement to the character and
appearance of the village compared to the existing garage on the site. The proposal
would therefore comply with Policies 4 and 6 of the Local Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:Delegated authority to approve, subject to minor alterations to the access as
required by the Highway Authority and subject to appropriate conditions.
Development Control Committee (East)
20
8 May 2008
10.
HONING - 20080209 - Continued siting of polytunnel; land at rear of Millbeck
White Horse Lane Briggate for Mr Turner and Miss Bullimore
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :03 Apr 2008
Case Officer :Miss C Ketteringham
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Countryside
Tree Preservation Order
THE APPLICATION
A retrospective planning application to retain a polytunnel (9.6m long x 2.2m wide)
comprising plastic sheeting supported by a wooden frame.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
Deferred at a previous meeting of the Committee.
PARISH COUNCIL
Objects:1. Not within the applicants' ownership.
2. If this is allowed when will it stop other land being claimed?
3. The land should be used for the village and not one person.
REPRESENTATIONS
Thirty-one letters of objection have been received on the following grounds:1. Not within the applicants' ownership.
2. Polytunnel is an eyesore.
3. Destruction of a wildlife habitat.
4. Danger from a dangerous structure.
CONSULTATIONS
Worstead Parish Council - Objects:1. Validity of application address.
2. Change of use of land not applied for.
3. Obtrusive and damaging to beauty of area.
4. Environmental Impact study should be carried out.
5. Disputed ownership of area.
Letter received from the applicants advising that the polytunnel is and has only ever
been used for the growing of fruit and vegetables.
Worstead Amenity Society - Briggate Mill is part of the historical heritage of the
parish of Worstead. This is disputed by residents and while the dispute continues it
seems inappropriate that planning permission should be granted.
The whole course of the Dilham Canal is a haven for wildlife and Briggate Mill is part
of that whole. The unauthorised clearance of the land has damaged the wildlife and
charm of the ruin in a natural wilderness; a polytunnel does nothing to enhance the
view.
Environmental Health - The condition of the former mill building has been roughly the
same for a number of years and has certainly overlapped the erection of the
polytunnel. Therefore the occupants of the land erected the polytunnel in the full
knowledge of the condition of the adjacent building.
Development Control Committee (East)
21
8 May 2008
From the inspection of the structure that was undertaken on the 24 January it was
not felt that the structure could be considered dangerous under the Building Act 1984
as it was not in such a condition that it required immediate action to be taken to make
it safe. The structure will be prone to continued deterioration and may become
dangerous under the Building Act 1984. However the responsibility for action to
remedy any danger would lie with the landowner of the structure rather than with the
occupier of the adjacent land at risk from the structural failure.
If the structure was in imminent danger of collapse then the Council could undertake
works to make that structure safe or fence off the area likely to be affected by such
collapse. In this case we would look to remove the dangerous material from the
building. As a temporary measure it may be that we would fence off the polytunnel
area so that if it did fall no one would be at risk.
Please note for information; the reason that North Norfolk District Council served
notice on this land to be fenced off was as Briggate Mill was "Open to Unauthorised
Entry", this was to protect public safety under the Local Government (Misc
Provisions) Act 1982.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 5: The Countryside (prevents general development in the countryside with
specific exceptions).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 21: Area of High Landscape Value (promotes conservation and enhancement,
prevents developments which would be significantly detrimental to appearance and
character).
MAIN ISSUE FOR CONSIDERATION
Visual impact.
APPRAISAL
The application was deferred at the last meeting in order to seek clarification on the
use of the building and the proximity of wildlife sites.
The application site is land that previously formed part of Briggate Mill close to the
Dilham Canal. The existing use of the land is stated as garden on the application
form. Although adjoining the rear boundary of the applicants' property, it does not
form the curtilage of the dwellinghouse for planning purposes. It lies within the
Countryside policy area and the Area of High Landscape Value.
It is understood the use of the polytunnel is for private horticultural related use only.
However following queries raised by Members at the last meeting further clarification
has been sought from the agent.
Development Control Committee (East)
22
8 May 2008
This is a controversial application locally, attracting a large number of objections,
although mainly relating to the ownership of the land, which as Members will be
aware is not a material planning consideration. The principal consideration in
determining this planning application is the visual impact of the polytunnel.
The polytunnel is of a type to be found not uncommonly in a domestic garden or
allotment. Although, not within the domestic curtilage of the applicants' property, the
site is adjacent and to the rear of the applicants' garden. The polytunnel is partially
screened from public view by dwellings and the remnants of Briggate Mill.
Consequently it is not considered to present any significant adverse landscape
impact. The visual impact of the structure could be satisfactorily mitigated by an
appropriate landscaping scheme to which the applicant has indicated agreement.
Concerns have been raised about the potential impacts of the polytunnel on local
wildlife interests. The application site is outside any area identified as of national,
international or County nature conservation interest or the consultation zones relating
to them. The closest site of international nature conservation importance is Broad
Fen at Dilham (Ramsar site). The closest point of the consultation zone which
surrounds this area is 2.8km from the site. East Ruston SSSI is approximately 2.4km
from the site. The closest site of County Wildlife interest is approximately 38m from
the polytunnel. This is part of the Dilham and North Walsham Canal of which the
habitat type is described as eutrophic running water. The retention of the polytunnel
could not be argued to have an adverse impact on any of these nature conservation
sites. Furthermore the cultivation and clearance of land at and around the polytunnel
is not something that would have required planning permission.
The response from the Environmental Health Officer confirms that the Briggate Mill is
not classified as a dangerous structure and should it become so, then the Council
has the necessary powers under the Building Act 1984 to take action which would
include if necessary fencing off the polytunnel. In these circumstances this issue is
not a material consideration in the determination of this planning application.
Consequently, it is considered it would be difficult justify refusal of planning
permission in this case and the proposal is considered to comply with the policies of
the Development Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:CONDITIONS:-
APPROVE,
SUBJECT
TO
THE
FOLLOWING
1) The polytunnel hereby permitted shall be used for horticultural purposes only.
2) Within two months of the date of this permission a landscaping scheme for the
boundaries of the site shall be submitted for approval to the Local Planning Authority.
The scheme shall be carried out no later than the next available planting season
following its approval.
3) Any new tree or shrub which within a period of five years from the date of planting
dies, is removed or become seriously damaged or diseased, shall be replaced during
the next planting season with another of a similar size and species to the Local
Planning Authority's satisfaction, unless prior written agreement is given to any
variation.
REASONS:1) In the interests of clarity and in accordance with Policy 5 of the adopted North
Norfolk Local Plan.
Development Control Committee (East)
23
8 May 2008
2) To protect and enhance the visual amenities of the area, in accordance with Policy
13 of the adopted North Norfolk Local Plan.
3) To protect and enhance the visual amenities of the area, in accordance with Policy
13 of the adopted North Norfolk Local Plan.
11.
NORTH WALSHAM - 20080466 - Demolition of garage and erection of dwelling;
21 Rye Close for Mr K Walker
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :20 May 2008
Case Officer :Mrs R Partridge
(Outline Planning Permission)
19750625 - (Full Planning Permission) - Erection of 61 private dwellings
Approved, 30 Jul 1975
THE APPLICATION
Only details of access are included for determination at this stage. The proposal
involves the demolition of the existing double garage and replacement with a
detached house. An indicative siting of the dwelling is included on the submitted plan.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
At the request of Councillor Seward having regard to the following planning issue:
Overdevelopment and overlooking.
TOWN COUNCIL
Object on grounds of overdevelopment and sub-standard living. Further comment on
the problems relating to surface water drainage and flooding.
REPRESENTATIONS
Four letters of objection received from local residents on the following grounds:
1. Overdevelopment/cramped over intensive development.
2. Additional access will exasperate the existing parking/turning "bottleneck" in the
cul-de-sac.
3. Overlooking, loss of light and intrusion of privacy.
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - No objection subject to imposition of appropriate
conditions.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 6: Residential Areas (areas primarily for residential purposes).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Development Control Committee (East)
24
8 May 2008
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Size of plot and relationship with adjoining development.
2. Neighbouring residential amenity.
APPRAISAL
The application site lies within the settlement boundary for North Walsham and within
a residential area. The immediate vicinity consists of single and two-storey dwellings,
both detached and semi-detached and all of a similar scale and design. The majority
of the dwellings have integral garages.
The existing property (21 Rye Close) occupies a large corner plot comprising a
detached single-storey dwelling, and a detached pitched roof double garage
separated by an approximate 3m gap. The existing garage abuts the southern site
boundary together with an evergreen hedge. The neighbouring property is one of a
pair of semi-detached dwellings with a blank gable facing the application site.
The submitted plan indicates siting of the proposed dwelling in line with the
neighbouring semi-detached dwellings and forward of the existing bungalow. This
would enable a proposed rear garden of 10m which would comply with the minimum
distance as recommended in the Design Guide.
The plot measures approximately 9.5m x 27.5m; the proposal indicates a proposed
floor area of 7.7m x 8.7 which is comparable to the floor of the nearby existing
detached two-storey dwellings (7.7m x 7.2m). The site can adequately accommodate
a detached dwelling similar in scale and design to the surrounding dwellings.
The west (rear) boundary consists of close boarded fence and various shrubs and
trees. The site from this aspect offers adequate screening towards a single-storey
dwelling beyond.
In conclusion it is considered that the proposal is appropriate in this location and as
such complies with Development Plan Policy.
RECOMMENDATION:CONDITIONS:-
APPROVE,
SUBJECT
TO
THE
FOLLOWING
2) These reserved matters shall relate to the layout, appearance, landscaping and
scale of the proposed development and this condition shall apply notwithstanding any
indications as to these matters which have been given in the current application.
3) These reserved matters shall include precise details relating to the parking and
turning provision associated with No. 21 Rye Close.
4) Prior to the first occupation of the dwelling hereby permitted the vehicular
accesses shall be constructed in accordance with the Norfolk County Council
residential access construction specification for the first 5m into the site as measured
back from the near edge of the adjacent carriageway.
5) Prior to the first occupation of the dwelling hereby permitted the proposed on-site
parking areas shall be laid out, demarcated, levelled, surfaced and drained in
accordance with the details pursuant to condition No.3 (above). They shall be
retained thereafter for that specific use.
REASONS:2) The application is submitted in outline form only and the details required are
pursuant to the provisions of Article 3(1) to the Town and Country Planning (General
Development Procedure) Order 1995 and the Town and Country Planning (General
Development Procedure) (Amendment) (England) Order 2006.
Development Control Committee (East)
25
8 May 2008
3) In this instance the Local Planning Authority is only prepared to grant a temporary
planning permission, on a trial basis, to enable the effects of the development upon
the residential amenities of the surrounding area to be properly established, in
accordance with Policies 16 and 17 of the adopted North Norfolk Local Plan.
4) To ensure satisfactory access into the site, in accordance with Policy 147 of the
adopted North Norfolk Local Plan.
5) To ensure the permanent availability of the parking and manoeuvring area, in the
interests of highway safety, and in accordance with Policy 147 of the adopted North
Norfolk Local Plan.
12.
RUNTON - 20080127 - Erection of one-and-a-half-storey detached dwelling;
Laburnum Caravan Park Water Lane West Runton for Mr and Mrs J Y Randell
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :20 Mar 2008
Case Officer :Mr Thompson/Mr Took
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Area of High Landscape Value
Countryside
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
19870417 - (Outline Planning Permission) - Erection of a single dwellinghouse
Refused, 09 Sep 1987
Appeal Withdrawn, 20 Sep 1990
19980565 - (Outline Planning Permission) - Erection of dwelling
Withdrawn, 21 Jul 1998
19981019 - (Full Planning Permission) - Siting of residential caravan for manager's
accommodation
Refused, 01 Sep 1998
19981766 - (Full Planning Permission) - Siting of caravan for manager's
accommodation
Approved, 17 Feb 1999
20071161 - (Outline Planning Permission) - Erection of two-storey detached dwelling
Refused, 24 Sep 2007
THE APPLICATION
The proposed erection of a residential dwelling to provide manager's accommodation
on a site extending to approximately 300sq.m, at the northern end of Water Lane.
Access is proposed onto a private drive, located at the entrance of the existing
caravan park. The proposed dwelling is a cottage-style building of red brick with clay
pantile roofs and gabled dormers to the first floor. The eaves height would be
approximately 4m and the ridge height approximately 8m.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
Required by the Head of Planning and Building Control in view of policy issues
involved.
PARISH COUNCIL
Object. Proposed site is outside development boundary, immediately adjacent to a
Conservation Area, in an area of countryside/high landscape value, and because of
coastal erosion the long term viability is questionable. A two-storey dwelling would
seriously alter the visual aspect of the village. The needs of the site manager are
recognised but do not justify a planning approval.
Development Control Committee (East)
26
8 May 2008
REPRESENTATIONS
The agents have submitted an explanatory letter which is attached at Appendix 6.
Two letters of objection from nearby residents received on the following grounds:1. Lack of need for a permanent dwelling.
2. Impact on privacy.
3. Impact on character of area.
The agents have written in to challenge the grounds of objection raised by close
neighbours with regard to the impact of the proposal on their properties.
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - No objections.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 5: The Countryside (prevents general development in the countryside with
specific exceptions).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 21: Area of High Landscape Value (promotes conservation and enhancement,
prevents developments which would be significantly detrimental to appearance and
character).
Policy 42: Development in Conservation Areas (developments affecting the setting
should preserve or enhance character).
Policy 124: Cliff-Top Static Caravan Sites between Sheringham and Overstrand (new
sites or extensions to existing sites may be permitted if they directly result in removal
of existing cliff-top site).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Principle of permanent dwelling in the Countryside policy area.
2. Implications on longer term presence of caravan park.
APPRAISAL
The application site is outside, but immediately adjoining, the settlement boundary for
West Runton as defined in the Local Plan. Permission was granted in 1999 for a
mobile home on the site, with a condition restricting its occupation to the
manager/warden (and immediate dependents) of the adjoining caravan site, and a
further condition requiring the removal of the caravan when no longer required.
The current proposal is to replace this mobile home with a permanent dwelling. The
earlier permission has been implemented and the 'mobile home', which has the
appearance of a single-storey bungalow has been on the site for a number of years.
Development Control Committee (East)
27
8 May 2008
The 1999 permission is a permanent commitment to a residential dwelling use on the
site, subject to its need by a manager/warden of the site. The current application
seeks to provide the dwelling in the shape of a one-and-a-half-storey cottage style
building of conventional construction. The site is of sufficient size to accommodate a
dwelling as proposed without any conflict with the recommendations in the Design
Guide in respect of garden sizes and window-to-window distances, and the design
proposed is generally in keeping with the scale and design of nearby dwellings.
The previous recent planning application was refused on the grounds that the site
was outside the defined settlement boundary, and that it was in conflict with the
Council's long term aim to seek the removal of the cliff top caravan sites in this part
of the District, a concern being that in the longer term a permanent dwelling would
potentially remain on the site beyond the period of its functional requirement. The
applicants' agents have since responded stating that the caravan park will never be
relocated voluntarily, and that the projected rate of coastal erosion in the area is not
such as to require the caravan site to relocate. More than half the caravan site is
outside the 100 year erosion line as indicated in the Shoreline Management Plan.
However, in order to guarantee that the proposed building would only be occupied in
conjunction with the caravan site, as is the permitted mobile home, the applicants are
prepared to accept a similar occupancy condition on the proposed dwelling, and in
addition would be prepared to enter into a Section 106 Agreement that the dwelling
be demolished if the caravan site ceased to operate.
It is considered that such an agreement would provide an adequate safeguard to
ensure a continuing link between the dwelling and the caravan site. Furthermore it is
not considered that the new dwelling would cause any harm to the setting of the
village and the Conservation Area.
In conclusion, whilst the proposal is outside the village development boundary,
material considerations to take into account are that there is already a permanent
permission for a residential property on the site, its occupancy is related directly to
tourism and the legal agreement offered will ensure that it would only exist for this
purpose. Accordingly approval is recommended, notwithstanding the Development
Plan policy issues discussed above.
RECOMMENDATION:Delegated authority to approve subject to the prior completion of a Section 106
Agreement as described in the report and to the imposition of appropriate
conditions.
13.
SOUTHREPPS - 20080588 - Erection of two-storey detached dwelling; adjacent
The Rodings Sandy Lane for Mrs P L Green and Mrs A J Ng
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :30 May 2008
Case Officer :Mr Thompson/Mr Took
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
Residential
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
20071894 - (Full Planning Permission) - Erection of two-storey detached dwelling
Refused, 18 Mar 2008
Development Control Committee (East)
28
8 May 2008
THE APPLICATION
The erection of a three-bedroom cottage style dwelling within the garden of an
existing property. The proposal is a revised version of the earlier proposal with the
footprint of the dwelling reduced to 90sq.m.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
Required by the Head of Planning and Building Control because of the Committee's
decision on the earlier application.
PARISH COUNCIL
Strongly objects - full comments attached at Appendix 7.
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - Awaiting comments.
Environmental Health - Awaiting comments.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 4: Selected Small Villages (small-scale residential development should
enhance character) (development should be Policy 6: Residential Areas (areas
primarily for residential purposes).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Impact on character of area.
2. Design.
3. Scale and nature of development.
4. Highway safety.
APPRAISAL
This application is a reduced version of the proposal refused by the Committee in
March on grounds of size, scale and over intensive development. The proposal is for
a scaled down version of the earlier scheme. The length of the proposed dwelling
has been reduced by 1m, and the width by 0.8m and the length of the rear extension
by 0.5m. The previously proposed garage has been omitted and the proposed house
is sited so that at its closest point would be 3m from the centreline of the hedge on
the north-eastern boundary. The height of the proposed building has also been
reduced by 0.35m. The proposed design now also incorporates a chimney and
cottage style windows, and has no first floor windows in either gable to minimise any
overlooking.
Development Control Committee (East)
29
8 May 2008
The application site lies within the development boundary for Southrepps where the
principle of new residential development is acceptable provided that it is suitable in
terms of design, scale, relationship with neighbouring properties and highway safety.
New residential development is also expected to enhance the character of the
village.
The Rodings comprises a detached, 1960's-style bungalow standing in a plot which
is roughly triangular in shape, formed by the junction with Sandy Lane and Thorpe
Market Road. The site is screened from the highway boundaries by leylandii trees
and hedging. The access to the site is gained from Sandy Lane to the north of the
plot and away from the existing junction. The site is outside but close to the
Southrepps Conservation Area.
The proposal is to subdivide the plot and construct a two-storey, cottage-style
dwelling. Both the existing and new dwelling would be served from the existing
access.
In terms of appearance, the proposal is of cottage-style, utilising the roof space by
the inclusion of dormer windows and constructed of brick, flint and clay pantiles
together with white finish joinery. The dwelling would be orientated to avoid potential
for overlooking, with the only first floor windows facing the existing bungalows serving
a bathroom, en-suite bathroom and a landing.
The proposed subdivision would maintain plot sizes for the existing and proposed
dwellings comparable to other plots in the area and would provide adequate amenity
space and vehicle provision compliant with Design Guide and Local Plan standards.
The Highway Authority had previously asked for a visibility splay of 43m from a 2.4m
set back and this is shown on the submitted plans. The proposed splay would require
the cutting back of part of the roadside hedge, but the majority of the hedge would be
unaffected.
In conclusion, it is considered that the proposed dwelling would enhance the form
and character of the village and there are no highway safety reasons to object to the
development. Accordingly it is considered that the proposal accords with
Development Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:CONDITIONS:-
APPROVE,
SUBJECT
TO
THE
FOLLOWING
2) Notwithstanding the provision of Class A of Schedule 2, Part 2 of the Town and
Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995, (or any Order
revoking, amending or re-enacting that Order) no gate shall be erected across the
approved access unless details have first been submitted to and approved in writing
by the Local Planning Authority.
3) Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby permitted a visibility splay
measuring 43m x 2.4m shall be provided to the south-eastern side of the access
where it meets the highway. The splay shall thereafter be maintained free from any
obstruction exceeding 0.6m above the level of the adjacent highway carriageway.
4) Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby permitted the proposed
access and on-site parking and turning areas shall be laid out, demarcated, levelled
and surfaced in accordance with the approved plan. They shall be retained thereafter
for those specific uses.
5) The development to which this permission relates shall be undertaken in strict
accordance with the submitted and approved plans, drawings and specifications,
unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
Development Control Committee (East)
30
8 May 2008
6) Notwithstanding the details referred to with the application, details of the brick type
to be used on the development shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the
Local Planning Authority.
REASONS:2) To ensure safe access to the site in accordance with Policy 147 of the adopted
North Norfolk Local Plan.
3) To ensure safe access to the site in accordance with Policy 147 of the adopted
North Norfolk Local Plan.
4) To ensure the permanent availability of the parking and manoeuvring area, in the
interests of highway safety, and in accordance with Policy 147 of the adopted North
Norfolk Local Plan.
5) To ensure the development is carried out in accordance with the expressed
intentions of the applicant and to ensure the satisfactory development of the site, in
accordance with Policy 13 of the adopted North Norfolk Local Plan.
6) In order for the Local Planning Authority to be satisfied that the materials to be
used will be visually appropriate for the approved development and its surroundings,
in accordance with Policy 13 of the adopted North Norfolk Local Plan.
14.
SUFFIELD - 20080441 - Variation of condition numbers 2 of planning
permissions 20051696 and 20061927 to retain nine holiday units as
constructed; Cook Farm Rectory Road for D and M Hickling Properties Limited
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :13 May 2008
Case Officer :Mr Thompson/Mr Took
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Countryside
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
19961612 - (Full Planning Permission) - Conversion of agricultural barns to holiday
accommodation
Approved, 24 Oct 1997
20051696 - (Full Planning Permission) - Change of use of former agricultural
buildings to six units of holiday accommodation
Approved, 19 Dec 2005
20061927 - (Full Planning Permission) - Conversion of barns to three units of holiday
accommodation
Approved, 10 Sep 2007
20071381 - (Full Planning Permission) - Conversion of barns to six units of holiday
accommodation
Refused, 20 Dec 2007
20071627 - (Full Planning Permission) - Variations to approved scheme to include
new vehicular access, erection of walls and installation of three LPG vessels with
security fence
Refused, 17 Dec 2007
THE APPLICATION
Planning permission references 20051696 and 20061927 both included conditions
relating the permissions to specific plans. This application is submitted as a variation
to those specifically approved plans. Conversion works have been substantially
completed and the application follows recent refusals to the buildings as currently
converted. The current application is to retain many of the conversion works as
Development Control Committee (East)
31
8 May 2008
completed, but with amendments to the access/parking arrangements, a reduction in
the number of openings on the northern elevation of the main barn complex
(including the deletion of rooflights) and the introduction of a flint wall enclosure on
the southern site. Indicative areas of landscaping are also included.
Amended plans have been submitted reducing further the number of openings in the
northern elevation.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
Required by the Head of Planning and Building Control given the planning history of
the development.
PARISH COUNCIL
Objects. See full comments in Appendix 8.
REPRESENTATIONS
Five letters of objection suggesting that the application does not address the
concerns previously raised, traffic, privacy, light pollution, loss of character of
buildings etc.
A further two letters have been received in response to the amended plans still
objecting on similar grounds.
Explanatory letter from agent attached as Appendix 8.
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - No objections.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 5: The Countryside (prevents general development in the countryside with
specific exceptions).
Policy 29: The Reuse and Adaptation of Buildings in the Countryside (specifies
criteria for converting buildings. Prevents residential conversion unless adjacent to a
settlement boundary).
North Norfolk Core Strategy (Submission Document):
Policy EC 2: The re-use of buildings in the Countryside (specifies criteria for
converting buildings for non-residential purposes).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Compliance with policy with regard to extent of new building.
2. Impact of conversion on the character of the building.
3. Impact on the surrounding landscape.
Development Control Committee (East)
32
8 May 2008
APPRAISAL
This application follows the recent refusal of two applications (references 20071381
and 20071627) by this Committee in December 2007. These applications were for
variations in the construction, design and layout of this group of barns which benefit
from earlier permissions for the conversion to holiday accommodation. The recent
applications were refused on grounds of the degree of reconstruction, the number of
new openings, the extension of the site and impact on the setting of the area and
highway safety. Subsequently enforcement notices were served requiring removal of
the unauthorised works. Appeals have since been submitted against both the
refusals of planning permission and the enforcement notices. The current application
is an attempt to overcome the previous grounds for refusal.
This application reverts to a layout similar to that previously approved. The main road
entrance situated at the southern side of the site would serve units 1-8 and the
associated parking area. An existing, but improved, access is proposed to serve the
one detached holiday unit (unit 9), again as previously approved.
The only parking provision north of the main barn would be two spaces for the
detached single-storey barn (unit 9). In an attempt to reduce the impact of the
conversion when seen from the north, the amended plans delete the rooflights
previously approved, block up one 3.2m wide window opening and leave only one
unit (unit 3) having to obtain access from the north side (with unit 1 also having a
secondary door access).
The majority of the walls within the courtyard have been rebuilt, which has resulted in
the ridge of the roofs being raised by approximately 0.6m, but the general form of the
barns has been retained.
In an attempt to reduce the impact of the new brickwork on the south side of the
barns, the application proposes the construction of 1.8m high flint and brick walls
along the south side of the range of buildings, creating shall enclosed courtyards and
a less harsh appearance.
LPG tanks are now proposed to be submerged and a single refuse enclosure
building is proposed. These details provide a less intrusive element than the previous
scheme and are considered more appropriate.
On balance whilst the extent of rebuilding exceeds that normally permitted under
Policy 29 of the Local Plan, it is considered the revisions now made together with the
imposition of conditions to control possible future impact such as lighting, additional
openings and extensions the proposed scheme is now considered to represent a
satisfactory resolution to the previous reservations regarding this development.
RECOMMENDATION:Approve subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions.
Development Control Committee (East)
33
8 May 2008
15.
SUTTON - 20080297 - Erection of three dwellings and garages; Rustic House
The Street for Mr and Mrs P Cutting
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :24 Apr 2008
Case Officer :Miss C Ketteringham
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Flood Zone 3
Residential
Selected Small Village
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
20071870 - (Full Planning Permission) - Erection of four dwellings and garages
Withdrawn, 08 Jan 2008
THE APPLICATION
Erection of three dwellings with detached garages on garden land within the grounds
of a detached two-storey house.
Amended plans have been submitted revising drainage and access details.
A Flood Risk Assessment accompanies the application.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
Deferred at a previous meeting of the Committee.
PARISH COUNCIL
Strongly objects because:1. The local flood alleviation scheme for Sutton is incomplete, further development
will exacerbate the problems. The proposed 450mm pipe under the street is
inconsistent with the two 300mm pipes under the street. Pipes are not as efficient as
ditches. Bends in the pipes would lead to blockages
2. Sewage system inadequate.
3. Insufficient parking for all plots.
4. Overlooking to neighbouring properties.
5. Highway safety.
6. Inadequate turning bay.
7. Three plots will cover the same ground area as the four plots originally proposed.
8. Estate style design.
9. Trees cut down before planning application submitted.
REPRESENTATIONS
Ten letters of representation has been received raising objections on grounds of:1. Overloading sewers, drains and increasing the risk of flash floods.
2. Overlooking, overshadowing and loss of privacy.
3. Noise and disturbance.
4. Highway safety - speeding traffic, lack of footpaths.
5. Overdevelopment.
6. Out of character with surrounding properties.
7. Bungalows preferable.
8. Internal Drainage Board should pipe the ditch further away from the site.
9. Smaller more affordable houses are needed in the village.
10. Internal Drainage Board alleviation scheme is not complete
Development Control Committee (East)
34
8 May 2008
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - No objections subject to all plots being accessed from
the private drive.
Environment Agency - The flood risk assessment proves that, contrary to the
Environment Agency Flood Zone maps, the site does not fall within Flood Zone 3.
The Environment Agency assumes that it lies within Flood Zone 1, the low risk Flood
Zone. The sequential and exception test are therefore not require for this application.
Water Management Alliance - In principle a new pipeline across the site to take water
from the culverts under The Street to a board maintained watercourse is acceptable.
The new pipeline should be installed adjacent to but not beneath the open channel
along the northern boundary. The Broads Internal Drainage Board will impose
conditions regarding the precise line of the pipe, and to restrict development within
3m of the pile and planting of trees and bushes within 9m. Discharge of overflows
from the rainwater harvesting tanks will require the Drainage Board's consent.
Comments awaited on amended plans.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 4: Selected Small Villages (small-scale residential development should
enhance character).
Policy 6: Residential Areas (areas primarily for residential purposes).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 147: New Accesses (developments which would endanger highway safety not
permitted).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Principle of development.
2. Flood risk.
3. Local drainage issues.
4. Impact on character of village.
5. Residential amenity.
6. Highway safety.
APPRAISAL
The application was deferred at the previous meeting to enable Members to visit the
site.
The application site is formed from the subdivision of the garden of an existing
dwelling which lies within the village development boundary on the western side of
Sutton. Under the terms of Local Plan Policy 4 the principle of small-scale housing
development such as this is acceptable subject to enhancement of the character of
the village and other planning considerations.
Development Control Committee (East)
35
8 May 2008
The site lies within an area identified on the Environment Agency Flood Risk Map as
at high risk from flooding (Zone 3) and within a part of Sutton where there are clearly
documented issues of poor local land drainage. These are issues that require careful
examination in the determination of this application.
Members will be familiar with Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood
Risk (PPS25) which requires Local Planning Authorities to apply the sequential test
to all new development within areas at high risk of flooding. The consequence of
applying this test to proposals for residential development is that wherever possible
such development should be located in areas of low flood risk.
In this instance, the application of the sequential test is not straightforward. The site
lies close to the outer edge of the flood risk zone. The Flood Risk Assessment (FRA)
submitted with the application considers the probability of both fluvial flooding and a
coastal breach scenario, concludes that the site should not be included within the
area at highest risk from flooding. The Environment Agency has evaluated the flood
risk assessment and is satisfied that the land is at low risk of flooding (zone 1) and
the sequential test should not be applied to this site.
Environment Agency flood maps are generalisations based on land contours and an
extrapolation of historic data. They make no distinction between river and sea
flooding, and perhaps, most importantly, take no account of flood defences. The
Government places the responsibility for a thorough site specific evaluation of the
flooding probability on the developer. This site-specific flood risk assessment is a
detailed analysis of the various flood risks and includes such factors as; flood
defences, climate change, site characteristics, water flows, distance from a probable
event and storage capacity of the intervening land and flood plains. Local Planning
Authorities are reliant upon the Environment Agency expertise to evaluate their
content and conclusions.
A separate, though not entirely unrelated, issue is that of the local drainage problems
experienced in Sutton. Water drains from a small catchment of agricultural land on
the eastern side of Sutton under The Street westwards towards Sutton Broad through
a series of drainage ditches and culverts. This site is important because a large
drainage ditch which is located on its northern boundary forms part of that drainage
system. The Water Management Alliance (IDB) has previously indicated that it would
be advantageous if the ditch were piped (although it is outside the application site).
The amended plan indicates the provision of such a pipe running parallel to the
existing ditch. The pipe would be funded by the developer and maintained by the IDB
and would provide scope to mitigate surface water problems in this part of the village.
The Water Management Alliance has been consulted on this revised scheme; its
comments are awaited.
The FRA assumes that driveways would be permeable and the water run-off from the
buildings would be stored as part of a rain water harvesting scheme. If the application
were approved, such measures could provide mitigation for both flood risk and local
drainage, but would need to be carefully conditioned to ensure the capacity is
adequate and the scheme is fully implemented.
With regard to the other planning details of the scheme, the layout provides for one
dwelling on the street frontage with the other two dwellings at the rear of the site.
This pattern of development is not dissimilar to other developments along this side of
the village. The proposal equates to a density of 15 dwellings per hectare, which,
whilst well below than that advocated in PPS3 (minimum of 30 dwellings per
hectare), reflects favourably with the character of this part of the village. Furthermore
the amount of built development potential on the site is constrained by the need to
provide maintenance distances from water courses around its perimeter.
Development Control Committee (East)
36
8 May 2008
In terms of design, the appearance of the house on the frontage plot would
incorporate features of the adjacent Rustic House, whereas the dwellings in the rear
plots would be a modern interpretation of the cottage style. Overall, given the mix of
building styles in the area, the design approach is considered appropriate for this
particular location.
The development, in terms of the garden sizes and the relationship of the proposed
houses and neighbouring properties, accords with the Council's Design Guide basic
amenity criteria.
To summarise, the general layout and design of this proposal is considered
acceptable, the Environment Agency has confirmed that the site lies within the low
flood risk zone and the sequential test does not need to be applied to this site, and
there are no Highway objections to the proposal. Consequently, the proposal is
considered to comply with the Development Plan and approval is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION:Delegated approval, subject to the further comments of the Water Management
Alliance (IDB), the imposition of appropriate conditions including materials,
drainage, access, provision of parking and turning and flood resistance and
resilience measures.
16.
THORPE MARKET - 20080285 - Erection of two-storey dwelling; land adjacent
Italska Cromer Road for Mrs J Hunter
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :22 Apr 2008
Case Officer :Mrs T Armitage
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Corridor of Movement
Residential
Selected Small Village
THE APPLICATION
Erection of a two-storey dwelling on land adjacent to 'Italska'. The site would be
accessed via a driveway which would access on to Cromer Road (A149).
Amended plans have been received in respect of access details.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
At the request of Councillor Arnold having regard to the following planning issue:
Highway safety.
PARISH COUNCIL
Support.
REPRESENTATIONS
One letter of objection received on the following grounds:1. Site is within Conservation Area.
2. Overlooking and loss of privacy.
3. Overshadowing.
4. Access onto already busy road.
5. Backland form.
6. Trees.
Development Control Committee (East)
37
8 May 2008
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - Comments on original plans: The proposal is located
immediately to the north of the property Italska on the Cromer Road, which is a
Principal Route in the Adopted Route Hierarchy.
The proposal would create an additional access onto Cromer Road (A149) at a point
where visibility is below the required minimum standard at this location. The local
speed restriction is 30mph, therefore according to DRMB which would apply; the
minimum visibility requirement is for 90m in either direction from a 2.4m setback. A
visibility splay of only approximately 77m visibility can be achieved in the critical
direction.
From my site visit it was noted that vehicular speeds are often in excess of the speed
limit, therefore as visibility is poor, the site is relatively close to a bend in the road,
and slowing, stopping and turning would cause an additional unwarranted hazard to
other vehicles. This proposed development, if permitted, would engender conditions
detrimental to highway safety and convenience. Therefore, I recommend the
application be refused.
Comments on amended plans: Although the fence line of the adjacent property has
now been set back from the highway, it is evident that the minimum visibility splay of
90m at a 2.4m setback cannot be achieved at the application site access. This is
partly due to curvature of the road in the southerly direction and the location of the
brick entrance wall to Italska.
I would not accept any proposal at this location that cannot demonstrate the
minimum visibility splays of 90m x 2.4m x 90m.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
It is considered that refusal of this application as recommended may have an impact
on the individual Human Rights of the applicant. However, having considered the
likely impact and the general interest of the public, refusal of the application is
considered to be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Local Plan - (Adopted 2 April 1998 - saved policies):
Policy 4: Selected Small Villages (small-scale residential development should
enhance character).
Policy 13: Design and Setting of Development (specifies design principles required
for new development).
Policy 146: Corridors of Movement (direct access not permitted except for roadside
services).
Policy 147: New Accesses (developments which would endanger highway safety not
permitted).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Principle of development.
2. Design and form.
3. Impact on Conservation Area.
3. Highway safety.
Development Control Committee (East)
38
8 May 2008
APPRAISAL
The site forms part of the existing garden to Italska, a one-and-a-half-storey property
and is within the village settlement boundary as identified in the Local Plan. The site
also lies within the Thorpe Market Conservation Area. In principle new housing is
acceptable within the development boundary of the village, subject to an acceptable
relationship with the neighbouring properties, enhancement of the form and character
of the village and Conservation Area and no adverse highway safety issues.
The proposed site is L-shaped and has a frontage on to Cromer Road where a new
access is proposed. Given the restricted width of the plot at this point, the dwelling
would be set back approximately 45m. From this distance the front elevation of the
proposed dwelling would be visible from Cromer Road behind the new landscaped
driveway.
Thorpe Market is characterised by residential development fronting the main road of
the village although on this western side there is no regular building line.
Consequently the principle of siting the property to the rear of the plot is considered
acceptable.
A two-storey dwelling is proposed. Eaves height would be minimised and gable
widths comply with Design Guide recommendations. Traditional materials are
proposed including flint, red brick and clay pantiles. This design approach as well the
scale of the dwelling is considered acceptable for the size of the plot.
To the north of the site is a single-storey dwelling, 'Coltsfoot'. This property is
centrally sited on a large garden plot. The bungalow is sited 20m away from the
northern boundary of the application site. The proposed two-storey dwelling is
indicated off set from this boundary by approximately 2m. Two north facing first floor
windows are indicated which would serve two bathrooms. Given that these windows
would be obscurely glazed and the separation distance between the two properties, it
is considered that there would be no adverse loss of amenity. The proposal would
accordingly comply with the Council's basic amenity criteria.
The proposal allows scope for a substantial amount of landscaping. It is considered
that in this context the proposal would offer the potential for the enhancement of the
appearance of this part of the village Conservation Area.
A new access is proposed to serve the dwelling on to Cromer Road (A149), a
Principal Route in the Adopted Route Hierarchy. The local speed restriction is 30mph
and the minimum visibility requirement is 90m in either direction. As originally
submitted a visibility splay of 77m (critical direction) was indicated although a recent
amendment (Appendix 9) has increased this distance to 85.5m. Despite this revision
County Highways have maintained their objection, given concerns over vehicular
speeds through the village and the proximity of the site to a bend in the road; they
consider that the 90m requirement should be strictly adhered to.
In conclusion the proposal, in view of the Highway Authority’s objection, is
considered contrary to Local Plan Policy 147 and refusal is recommended.
RECOMMENDATION:Refuse on highway safety grounds.
Development Control Committee (East)
39
8 May 2008
17.
APPLICATIONS APPROVED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS
ALBY - 20080164 - Erection of replacement front conservatory; Conway
Blacksmiths Lane Erpingham for Mr H Wright
(Full Planning Permission)
ALDBOROUGH - 20080268 - Erection of first floor rear extension; I Dunno
Thwaite Hill for Mr and Mrs Bacon
(Full Planning Permission)
ALDBOROUGH - 20080298 - Erection of replacement single-storey side
extension; 3 The Mill Mill Lane for Mr J Thornberry
(Full Planning Permission)
ANTINGHAM - 20080234 - Erection of rear conservatory; Pebelocsis
Southrepps Road for Mrs A Griffiths
(Full Planning Permission)
AYLMERTON - 20080341 - Siting of two sheds and home office; Durian House
Beechwood Avenue for Mr J Pitcher
(Full Planning Permission)
BACTON - 20080170 - Erection of side porch/covered way; Butterflies Church
Road for Mr I Dearden
(Full Planning Permission)
BACTON - 20080171 - Erection of side porch/covered way; Butterflies Church
Road for Mr I Dearden
(Alteration to Listed Building)
BACTON - 20080216 - Erection of two-storey rear extension and conservatory;
Lark Rise Church Road for Mr and Mrs Ashness
(Full Planning Permission)
BRUMSTEAD - 20080085 - Erection of replacement dwelling; Old Barn Farm
Old Barn Road for Mr A Leveridge
(Full Planning Permission)
CATFIELD - 20080155 - Conversion of barn to residential annexe; Mill House
Ludham Road for Mrs J Reid
(Full Planning Permission)
CATFIELD - 20080233 - Erection of single-storey rear extension; Brambles
Back Lane for Mr and Mrs Allen
(Full Planning Permission)
COLBY - 20080247 - Erection of single-storey extension; The Old Cottage
Colby Corner for Mr and Mrs Clarke
(Full Planning Permission)
COLBY - 20080261 - Erection of two-storey rear extension; Coppertops Colby
Road Banningham for Messrs M J and S Feneron
(Full Planning Permission)
Development Control Committee (East)
40
8 May 2008
CROMER - 20080166 - Erection of detached one-and-a-half-storey dwelling; 42
Cromwell Road for Mr and Mrs N Babbage
(Planning Permission; Reserved Matters)
CROMER - 20080212 - Erection of rear conservatories; Three New Dwellings
Connaught Road for Mr Royall
(Full Planning Permission)
CROMER - 20080235 - Erection of one and a half storey dwelling; land Between
27 and 30 Norwich Road for Mr A R Hams
(Full Planning Permission)
CROMER - 20080236 - Erection of single-storey rear extension and detached
garage; 79 Station Road for Mr J Watts
(Full Planning Permission)
CROMER - 20080128 - Erection of front porch and rear balcony; 15 Arbor Road
for Mr Fisher
(Full Planning Permission)
CROMER - 20080176 - Erection of attached three-storey dwelling; 17 Prince of
Wales Road for Mr P Unwin
(Full Planning Permission)
CROMER - 20080242 - Erection of rear conservatory; 21 Howards Hill for Mr C
Crane
(Full Planning Permission)
FELMINGHAM - 20080161 - Erection of single-storey extension, alterations to
windows and doors, formation of access and car park; Grange Farm Grange
Road for Mr J Turley
(Full Planning Permission)
FELMINGHAM - 20080199 - Erection of two-storey rear extension; Dairy Farm
Cottage Hall Road for Mrs D Clarke
(Full Planning Permission)
GIMINGHAM - 20080147 - Erection of garages; Barn at Gimingham Hall Farm
Hall Road for Mr Wilson
(Full Planning Permission)
GIMINGHAM - 20080197 - Erection of two-storey (part cantilevered) rear
extension and one-and-a-half-storey end extension; Pittarrow Heath Lane for
Mr A Cargill
(Full Planning Permission)
HANWORTH - 20080178 - Installation of window; Orchard House Gunton Park
White Post Road for Mr and Mrs S Lennane
(Alteration to Listed Building)
HAPPISBURGH - 20080337 - Change of use from redundant post office/shop to
ancillary residential accommodation; Post Office Stores Whimpwell Green for
Mrs G M Guyatt
(Full Planning Permission)
Development Control Committee (East)
41
8 May 2008
HORNING - 20080270 - Erection of single-storey side extension; 18 Broadwater
Way for Mr and Mrs Buckley
(Full Planning Permission)
HORNING - 20080327 - Erection of single-storey front extension with balcony
above, single-storey side extension and one-and-a-half-storey rear extension; 3
Broadwater Way for Mr D Avelino
(Full Planning Permission)
HOVETON - 20080254 - Erection of replacement garage; Holly Wood Meadow
Drive for Mr C Barham
(Full Planning Permission)
HOVETON - 20080274 - Erection of front conservatory; 6 Three Acre Close for
Mr D Barnett
(Full Planning Permission)
INGWORTH - 20080228 - Installation of liquid petroleum gas storage tank; Point
Cottage 79 Priory Lane for The National Trust
(Full Planning Permission)
LUDHAM - 20080177 - Erection of replacement rear extension and detached
garage; Little Orchard Lovers Lane for Mr I Cullum
(Full Planning Permission)
MUNDESLEY - 20080181 - Removal of garage and side extension and
construction of raised roof to provide first floor accommodation and attached
garage; Hill Lodge 1a Links Road for Mr and Mrs J Coleman
(Full Planning Permission)
MUNDESLEY - 20080320 - Erection of single-storey dwelling with
accommodation in roofspace; land rear of The Stables 43 High Street for Ms H
Straw and Ms C Straw
(Outline Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20080271 - Erection of two-storey side extension; 23 Long
Barrow Drive for Mr and Mrs Baird
(Full Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20080290 - Change of use of first floor from Class A1
(retail) to Class D2 (fitness suite); 6 St Nicholas Court Vicarage Street for Mr
and Mrs Bullimore
(Full Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20080294 - Erection of replacement two-storey dwelling
(revised design); Appledor Anchor Road Spa Common for Mr Pooley
(Full Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20080060 - Erection of building for storage of timber and
detached office; plot 3 Cornish Way for Joinery Softwoods Limited
(Full Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20080287 - Erection of extension and laying out of
additional car park; Tungate Farm Tungate for R Leisure
(Full Planning Permission)
Development Control Committee (East)
42
8 May 2008
OVERSTRAND - 20080222 - Erection of two-storey side extension; 21 Church
Close for Mr and Mrs I Elliott
(Full Planning Permission)
PASTON - 20080272 - Erection of summerhouse; 2 Hennesseys Loke
Edingthorpe for Mr M J Mawby
(Full Planning Permission)
PASTON - 20080349 - Conversion of squash courts to control room and
offices; Bacton Gas Terminal Paston Road Bacton for Perenco UK Limited
(Full Planning Permission)
POTTER HEIGHAM - 20080179 - Erection of front extension; Robarte Chapel
Lane for Mr and Mrs N High
(Full Planning Permission)
POTTER HEIGHAM - 20080292 - Erection of shed/domestic workshop; Wildcroft
33 Church Road for Mrs J Beckett
(Full Planning Permission)
RUNTON - 20080194 - Erection of single-storey extension; Oakhurst Top
Common East Runton for Mr and Mrs P Allen
(Full Planning Permission)
RUNTON - 20080250 - Erection of potting shed, store shed, aviary and
combined hen house/aviary; Hill House Holt Road Cromer for Mrs C M A
Farrow
(Full Planning Permission)
RUNTON - 20080264 - Change of use of storage area to one caravan pitch; The
Poplars Caravan Park Brick Lane East Runton for Mr K Parfitt
(Full Planning Permission)
RUNTON - 20080159 - Erection of single-storey rear extension and garage;
Midsummer House The Hurn West Runton for Mr and Mrs J C Anseline
(Full Planning Permission)
RUNTON - 20080245 - Erection of front, side and rear extensions; 118 Cromer
Road West Runton for Mr and Mrs E Williams
(Full Planning Permission)
SCOTTOW - 20080152 - Change of use of part former education block to B1
(office) for prison governor; former RAF Coltishall Tunstead Road for Ministry
Justice Custodial Property
(Full Planning Permission)
SCOTTOW - 20080215 - Formation of vehicular access; junction of Tunstead
Road and Barton Road RAF Coltishall for Annington Homes Limited
(Full Planning Permission)
SKEYTON - 20080318 - Erection of single-storey side extension; Brick Kiln
Bungalow Church Road for Mr M Hicks
(Full Planning Permission)
Development Control Committee (East)
43
8 May 2008
SKEYTON - 20080328 - Erection of first floor extension; Plantation House
Norwich Road for Mr and Mrs D Pennington
(Full Planning Permission)
STALHAM - 20071885 - Erection of twelve two-storey and three-storey
apartments; Weavers House 1 High Street for Mr T P Turnwell
(Outline Planning Permission)
STALHAM - 20080218 - Erection of rear conservatory and detached garage; 16
Heron Gardens for Mr and Mrs J G B Bolton
(Full Planning Permission)
STALHAM - 20080238 - Erection of replacement conservatory; 103 Millside for
Mr and Mrs Bell
(Full Planning Permission)
STALHAM - 20080269 - Alterations and erection of side extension; 89 Millside
for Mr I Burton-Pye
(Full Planning Permission)
STALHAM - 20080307 - Erection of single-storey rear extension; 33 Heron
Gardens for Mr P Dennis
(Full Planning Permission)
STALHAM - 20080313 - Conversion of garage with ancillary first floor
accommodation to two units of holiday accommodation; Chapelfield Cottage
Chapel Field Chapel Field Road for Mr G Holmes
(Full Planning Permission)
STALHAM - 20080315 - Erection of single-storey rear extension and front
extension to garage; The Linnets Moor Lane The Green for Mr and Mrs Burdett
(Full Planning Permission)
STALHAM - 20080325 - Change of use from A1 (retail) to D1 (beauty and
tanning salon); 95 High Street for Miss S Murtha
(Full Planning Permission)
SUTTON - 20080169 - Retention of front door; Stone Cottage The Street for
Miss J Dyball
(Alteration to Listed Building)
SUTTON - 20080210 - Erection of side conservatory; Holly Farm Moor Road for
Mrs Norris
(Full Planning Permission)
SWANTON ABBOTT - 20080121 - Erection of single-storey dwelling; Shangri La
Long Common Lane for Mr and Mrs J E Smith
(Outline Planning Permission)
SWANTON ABBOTT - 20080251 - Erection of porch and conservatory; White
Cottage Aylsham Road for Mr M Chipperfield
(Full Planning Permission)
SWANTON ABBOTT - 20080326 - Conversion of redundant building to two
units of holiday accommodation; Pond Farm The Hill for Mr H Read
(Full Planning Permission)
Development Control Committee (East)
44
8 May 2008
TRIMINGHAM - 20080302 - Erection of replacement garage; 6 Broadwood Close
for Mr and Mrs Slama
(Full Planning Permission)
WITTON - 20080204 - Conversion of outbuilding to two units of holiday
accommodation; The Yards Mill Common Road Ridlington for Mrs N Yerrill
(Full Planning Permission)
18.
APPLICATIONS REFUSED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS
NORTH WALSHAM - 20080073 - Erection of single-storey dwelling and garage;
7 Oaklands Park for Mr and Mrs R Moy
(Full Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20080198 - Erection of building for agricultural storage
and accommodation of livestock; land at Bradfield Road for Mr K Rowbotham
(Full Planning Permission)
OVERSTRAND - 20080220 - Erection of single-storey dwelling; land adjacent 3
Beach Close for Mr M R Chapman
(Full Planning Permission)
RUNTON - 20080193 - Erection of one and a half storey dwelling; land at
Widgeons Home Close West Runton for Dr and Mrs P Saunders
(Full Planning Permission)
SEA PALLING - 20080258 - Erection of two single-storey dwellings; land rear of
Old Cottage Church Road for Mr E Smith
(Full Planning Permission)
APPEALS SECTION
19.
NEW APPEALS
OVERSTRAND - 20071879 - Erection of single-storey dwelling; land at 3 Cromer
Road for Mr and Mr P Eden
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS
SUFFIELD - 01/097/DEV6/07/001 - Cooks Farm Rectory Road for D & M Hickling
Properties Ltd
PUBLIC INQUIRY
SUFFIELD - 01/097/DEV6/07/001-1 - Barn conversions not being carried out in
accordance with plans; Cooks Farm Rectory Road for D & M Hickling
Properties Ltd
PUBLIC INQUIRY
SUFFIELD - 20071381 - Conversion of barns to six units of holiday
accommodation; Cooks Farm Rectory Road for D & M Hickling Properties
Limited
PUBLIC INQUIRY
Development Control Committee (East)
45
8 May 2008
SUFFIELD - 20071627 - Variations to approved scheme to include new
vehicular access, erection of walls and installation of three LPG vessels with
security fence; Cooks Farm Rectory Road for D & M Hickling Properties Ltd
PUBLIC INQUIRY
20.
PUBLIC INQUIRIES AND INFORMAL HEARINGS - PROGRESS
NORTH WALSHAM (WEST WARD) - 20071135 - Residential development; land
at Cromer Road and Bradfield Road for Norfolk Homes Limited
PUBLIC INQUIRY
NORTH WALSHAM (WEST WARD) - 20071136 - Residential development; land
at former Marricks Wire Ropes Cromer Road for Norfolk Homes Limited
PUBLIC INQUIRY
SWANTON ABBOTT - 20070243 - Erection of 4 terraced dwellings; land
adjacent former Weavers Arms Aylsham Road for Horning Properties
INFORMAL HEARING 24 Jun 2008
SWANTON ABBOTT - 20071469 - Erection of three detached houses; land
adjacent to Ex Weavers Arms Aylsham Road for Horning Properties
INFORMAL HEARING 24 Jun 2008
21.
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS APPEALS - PROGRESS
BACTON - 20071293 - Erection of two single-storey dwellings; land at Sea Holly
Kimberley Road for Mr S Norman
HOVETON - 20071247 - Demolition of hotel and erection of twenty-four
apartments with car parking below; The Broads Hotel Station Road for Mr J R
Herbert
SITE VISIT :- 03 Apr 2008
KNAPTON - 20071727 - Erection of two single-storey dwellings; The Spinney
Mundesley Road for Mr and Mrs Merrill
SITE VISIT :- 01 May 2008
MUNDESLEY - 01/071/DEV6/07/005 - Authorised enforcement action for
removal of unauthorised flue; 32 High Street for Halit Kol
MUNDESLEY - 20071149 - Erection of two-storey dwelling; land at 20
Beckmeadow Way for Mr and Mrs D Spinks
NORTH WALSHAM (WEST WARD) - 20071509 - Erection of two-storey
extension to provide two apartments; Garden Court Aylsham Road for T H P D
Properties Limited
SITE VISIT :- 01 May 2008
OVERSTRAND - 20071678 - Erection of single-storey dwelling and garage;
Beckhythe Cottage 3 High Street for Mr and Mrs Aylward
Development Control Committee (East)
46
8 May 2008
22.
APPEAL DECISIONS
CROMER (TOWN WARD) - 20071364 - Erection of eighteen two-bed flats; site at
Cambridge Street for Taylor Patterson Trustees Limited
APPEAL DECISION :- DISMISSED
MUNDESLEY - 20070626 - Erection of dwelling; land adjacent to 35 Trunch
Road for Mr J Bonham
APPEAL DECISION :- DISMISSED
SEA PALLING - 20030910 - Erection of single-storey dwelling and garage; land
adjacent to The Old Vicarage Church Road for Mr D Buckland
APPEAL DECISION :- DISMISSED
Development Control Committee (East)
47
8 May 2008