OFFICERS' REPORTS TO
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE (EAST) - 3 SEPTEMBER 2009
Each report for decision on this Agenda shows the Chief Officer responsible, the
recommendation of the Head of Planning and in the case of private business the
paragraph(s) of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972 under which it is
considered exempt. None of the reports have financial, legal or policy implications save
where indicated.
PUBLIC BUSINESS - ITEMS FOR DECISION
PLANNING APPLICATIONS
Note :- Recommendations for approval include a standard time limit condition as
Condition No.1, unless otherwise stated.
1.
NORTH WALSHAM - 20090743 - Erection of one two-storey dwelling and one
one-and-a-half-storey dwelling; 6 New Road for Worstead Properties
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :22 Sep 2009
Case Officer :Mr Thompson/Mr Took
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Residential Area
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
20071691 - (Full Planning Permission) - Demolition of two dwellings and erection of
eleven terraced dwellings
Approved, 12 May 2008
20090007 - (Full Planning Permission) - Change of use from residential to A3
(restaurant)/residential
Approved, 02 Mar 2009
THE APPLICATION
To develop an area of vacant land at the rear of a two-storey (residential/commercial)
building with two detached dwellings. One of the dwellings would be part two/part
single-storey incorporating a mono pitch roof design; the other to the rearmost part of
the site would be one-and-a-half-storey incorporating two bedrooms and a bathroom
in the roof space. Both dwellings would be of timber frame construction with cedar
clad walls and pantile roofs.
Access would be via an existing entrance onto New Road.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
At the request of Councillor Gay having regard to the following planning issue:
Over-development and parking issues.
TOWN COUNCIL
Objects on grounds of over-development and lack of adequate parking for the cafe
currently in the course of development.
CONSULTATIONS
County Council (Highways) - No objection, subject to the imposition of three
conditions.
Development Control Committee (East)
1
3 September 2009
Sustainability Co-ordinator - Confirms that the proposal complies with the
requirements of Policy EN 6 and raises no objection subject to a condition requiring
the dwellings to comply with Code Level 2 of the Code for Sustainable Homes.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Core Strategy (Adopted September 2008):
Policy SS 3: Housing (strategic approach to housing issues).
Policy HO 7: Making the most efficient use of land (Housing density) (Proposals
should optimise housing density in a manner which protects or enhances the
character of the area).
Policy EN 4: Design (specifies criteria that proposals should have regard to, including
the North Norfolk Design Guide and sustainable construction).
Policy EN 6: Sustainable construction and energy efficiency (specifies sustainability
and energy efficiency requirements for new developments).
Policy CT 6: Parking provision (requires compliance with the Council's car parking
standards other than in exceptional circumstances).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Principle of residential development.
2. Density.
3. Impact on character of area and adjoining properties.
4. Highway safety.
APPRAISAL
The site is close to North Walsham town centre and within the area designated as
residential in the Core Strategy. Consequently there is no objection in principle to the
development of the site for housing.
The surrounding area is characterised by a mix of commercial, community and
residential uses. The existing buildings in the immediate area are of no particular
architectural quality and as the proposed dwellings are situated to the rear of the
properties fronting New Road, the impact on the form and character of the area
would be limited.
The two dwellings are of differing designs, one two-storey and one one-and-a-halfstorey, and are orientated and designed to avoid the potential for overlooking. The
designs are considered acceptable given the context on the site and its surroundings
together with the sustainable features that have been incorporated.
Although the proposed plot sizes are relatively small the density equates to 29
dwellings per hectare, below Government guidance and the adopted Core Strategy
requirements (40 dwellings/hectare). The adopted Design Guide recommends that
the area of a plot given over to private amenity space should normally be no less that
Development Control Committee (East)
2
3 September 2009
the footprint of the dwelling. Both plots comply with this recommendation. Plot 1 has
82sq.m footprint and 89sq.m private garden area, whilst plot 2 has 84sq.m footprint
and 105sq.m private garden area. In both cases the private garden areas meet the
other main requirement of paragraph 3.3.10 of the Design Guide in having an aspect
which is substantially free from shading from trees and buildings.
The site provides two parking spaces within car ports for each property plus two
additional spaces for visitors. The Town Council raises concerns with regard to the
lack of parking for the cafe currently being developed on the site frontage, but the
parking for this use is on the forecourt and the proposal therefore has no impact on
this provision. The site is overgrown and unused and has never been used for
parking.
In conclusion the proposal is considered to be in accordance with the policies of the
adopted Core Strategy and the application is therefore recommended for approval.
RECOMMENDATION:Approval, subject to the imposition of appropriate conditions.
2.
ROUGHTON - 20090680 - Erection of detached two-storey dwelling; Sunnyside
Chapel Road for Mrs Fairchild and Mr Flowerday
MINOR DEVELOPMENT - Target Date :02 Sep 2009
Case Officer :Mr Thompson/Mr Took
(Outline Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
Residential Area
THE APPLICATION
Approval sought for access and layout only for a detached two-storey dwelling. The
proposed plot forms the eastern side garden of a semi-detached dwelling
(Sunnyside) which is situated on the north side of Chapel Road. The plot measures
approximately 12m wide at the front, reducing to 6m wide at the rear, and would be
approximately 47m depth. The proposed dwelling is shown with a footprint
approximately 7m wide and 9m deep.
The existing access to Sunnyside would be altered to provide a shared access for
both the new and existing dwellings. Parking and turning areas would be provided for
each dwelling. The layout of the site shows the proposed building sited on the same
building line as the properties either side.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
One of the applicants is a member of staff.
PARISH COUNCIL
Awaiting comments.
CONSULTATIONS
Conservation, Design and Landscape Manager (Landscape) - No objections.
Recommends that an arboricultural method statement be required at the reserved
matters stage, together with landscaping requirements.
Development Control Committee (East)
3
3 September 2009
County Council (Highways) - Visibility is in accordance with the requirements of 59m
splays from a 2.4m set back. No objections subject to the access constructed to
County Council standards.
Sustainability Co-ordinator - Recommends condition requiring the dwelling to achieve
a Code Level 2 rating in accordance with the Code for Sustainable Homes.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Core Strategy (Adopted September 2008):
Policy SS 3: Housing (strategic approach to housing issues).
Policy HO 7: Making the most efficient use of land (Housing density) (Proposals
should optimise housing density in a manner which protects or enhances the
character of the area).
Policy EN 1: Norfolk Coast Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and The Broads
(prevents developments which would be significantly detrimental to the areas and
their setting).
Policy EN 4: Design (specifies criteria that proposals should have regard to, including
the North Norfolk Design Guide and sustainable construction).
Policy EN 6: Sustainable construction and energy efficiency (specifies sustainability
and energy efficiency requirements for new developments).
Policy CT 5: The transport impact of new development (specifies criteria to ensure
reduction of need to travel and promotion of sustainable forms of transport).
Policy CT 6: Parking provision (requires compliance with the Council's car parking
standards other than in exceptional circumstances).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Principle of development.
2. Adequacy of plot size.
3. Highway safety.
APPRAISAL
The site is within the settlement boundary for Roughton and in an area designated as
residential in the Core Strategy. Infill residential development in this location is
therefore acceptable in principle subject to compliance with detailed criteria of other
policies of the Core Strategy.
Although the site is within the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty it is within a ribbon
of houses along this side of Chapel Road. The proposed additional dwelling would
have no adverse impact on the character or appearance of the Area of Outstanding
Natural Beauty.
Development Control Committee (East)
4
3 September 2009
The plot size is adequate to accommodate a dwelling of the size indicated and the
development would be in keeping with the character of existing development in the
area. Furthermore, the proposal would serve to make efficient use of land and hence
would comply with Policy HO 7. Issues of detailed design and sustainable
construction/energy efficiency can be dealt with at the reserved matters stage and by
conditions. At this stage there is no conflict with Policies EN 4 and EN 6.
The adjoining site to the east has a mature ash tree to the rear of the house close to
the boundary with the application site. The Conservation, Design and Landscape
Manager considers that the tree is far enough from the proposed dwelling so that the
construction is unlikely to have any adverse impact on the tree. As a precaution a
condition should be imposed to require an arboricultural method statement to be
submitted with the reserved matters detailing methods to prevent any adverse impact
on the tree.
The access to the site is on the inside of a gentle bend in the road. However the site
is within the 30mph limit and where the Highway Authority has assessed the traffic
speeds to be generally in the range 35-37 mph. The available visibility from the
access meets the requirements for these traffic speeds. This is assisted by a footpath
and wide verge outside the site. There is therefore no highway objection to the
proposal.
In conclusion it is considered that the granting of planning permission in this case
would comply with the policies of the Development Plan.
RECOMMENDATION:CONDITIONS:-
APPROVE,
SUBJECT
TO
THE
FOLLOWING
2) These reserved matters shall relate to the appearance, scale and landscaping of
the proposed development and this condition shall apply notwithstanding any
indications as to these matters which have been given in the current application.
3) Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby permitted the vehicular
access shall be constructed in accordance with the Norfolk County Council
residential access construction specification for the first 4.5m into the site as
measured back from the near edge of the adjacent carriageway.
4) Prior to the first occupation of the development hereby permitted the proposed
access and turning areas for both the existing and the proposed dwelling shall be laid
out in accordance with the approved plan. They shall be retained thereafter for those
specific uses.
5) The dwelling hereby permitted shall achieve a Code Level 2 rating in accordance
with the requirements of the Code for Sustainable Homes: Technical Guide (or such
national measure or sustainability for house design that replaces that scheme). The
dwelling shall not be occupied until a Final Code Certificate has been issued and
submitted to the Council certifying that Code Level 2 has been achieved.
6) The reserved matters referred to in condition 2 shall include as part of the
landscaping details an arboricultural method statement specifying the measures to
be taken to prevent any adverse impact on the ash tree on the adjoining site to the
east.
REASONS:2) The application is submitted in outline form only and the details required are
pursuant to the provisions of Article 3(1) to the Town and Country Planning (General
Development Procedure) Order 1995 and the Town and Country Planning (General
Development Procedure) (Amendment) (England) Order 2006.
Development Control Committee (East)
5
3 September 2009
3) To ensure satisfactory access into the site, in accordance with Policy CT 5 of the
adopted North Norfolk Core Strategy.
4) To ensure the permanent availability of the parking and manoeuvring area, in the
interests of highway safety, and in accordance with Policy CT 6 of the adopted North
Norfolk Core Strategy.
5) In the interests of achieving a satisfactory form of sustainable construction in
accordance with Policy EN 6 of the adopted North Norfolk Core Strategy.
6) In order to protect trees on the adjoining site, in accordance with the requirements
of Policy EN 4 of the adopted North Norfolk Core Strategy.
3.
WORSTEAD - 20090748 - Conversion and extension of forge to provide annexe
and erection of single-storey rear extension; Forge Cottage Westwick Road for
Mr Gilligan
Target Date :18 Sep 2009
Case Officer :Miss C Ketteringham
(Full Planning Permission)
CONSTRAINTS
Countryside Policy Area
Conservation Area
RELEVANT PLANNING HISTORY
SM11240 - Alterations and extensions
Approved, September 1973
20080459 - (Full Planning Permission) - Conversion and extensions to the forge to
provide a residential dwelling
Refused, 15 May 2008
20080460 - (Full Planning Permission) - Erection of two-storey extension and
subdivision to provide two separate dwellings
Refused, 15 May 2008
20081167 - (Full Planning Permission) - Conversion and extensions to the forge to
provide a residential dwelling
Refused, 27 Oct 2008
Appeal Dismissed, 23 Mar 2009
THE APPLICATION
Forge Cottage is a two-storey end of terrace property. The proposal has two
elements.
The first involves a rear, mono-pitch extension, (6.4m wide by 3.1m deep) to provide
a new kitchen and ground floor shower room.
The second is to refurbish and extend an existing outbuilding to create an annexe
comprising sitting room/kitchen and a single bedroom. A garage would be
demolished to facilitate the extension to the outbuilding.
REASON FOR REFERRAL TO COMMITTEE
At the request of Councillor Wilkins having regard to the following planning issues:
Overdevelopment and impact of the proposal on the Conservation Area.
PARISH COUNCIL
Awaiting comments.
Development Control Committee (East)
6
3 September 2009
REPRESENTATIONS
Letter of objection received from local resident suggesting the proposal involves
holiday letting accommodation which there is enough of in the area. Considers the
proposals to be an incongruous construction in close vicinity to listed buildings.
CONSULTATIONS
Conservation, Design and Landscape Manager (Conservation and Design) Comments that the site is a sensitive one within the heart of the Worstead
Conservation Area. It is occupied by a cottage which has been very heavily altered
over time, an outbuilding known as 'the Forge', which has lost its original roof, and a
modern garage. The site is not sacrosanct from further change.
The extension is of fairly modest size and would help mask the two-storey addition. It
would also arguably result in a more coherent rear elevation. No objection to this
element of the application, although design-wise the scheme would benefit from the
deletion of the rooflights on a small lean-to roof slope. Furthermore, it would be
preferable if the first floor windows were replaced within more appropriate window
frames rather than blocked with brickwork as currently proposed.
The demolition of the garage is welcome. Reinstating the roof on the outbuilding
must also be considered a planning gain. With the extension being modest in size
and with appropriate conditions covering brick and tile samples and window frames,
the scheme as a whole would enhance the character of the Conservation Area.
Environmental Health - Awaiting comments.
Norfolk Landscape Archaeology - No objection, subject to a recording condition.
Worstead Amenity Society - The site is particularly sensitive, not only is it within the
Conservation Area but overlooks the Grade I listed St Mary's church and the Grade
II* listed Manor house.
Raises questions about whether the outbuilding was previously a forge, its historic
value as well as the intended future use of the dwellings and how many units of
accommodation are proposed. The extension of the cottages seems unnecessary in
view of its generous ground floor accommodation, unless a later conversion to two
dwellings were contemplated.
The presumption is that there will be more than two cars, increasing vehicle
movements through the inadequate and unsafe entrance on Vicarage Lane.
The kitchen extension will over-extend an already extended cottage.
HUMAN RIGHTS IMPLICATIONS
It is considered that the proposed development may raise issues relevant to
Article 8 : The right to respect for private and family life, and
Article 1 of The First Protocol: The right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
Having considered the likely impact on an individual's Human Rights, and the general
interest of the public, approval of this application as recommended is considered to
be justified, proportionate and in accordance with planning law.
CRIME AND DISORDER ACT 1998 - SECTION 17
The application raises no significant crime and disorder issues.
POLICIES
North Norfolk Core Strategy (Adopted September 2008):
Policy HO 8: House extensions and replacement dwellings in the Countryside
(specifies the limits for increases in size and impact on surrounding countryside).
Development Control Committee (East)
7
3 September 2009
Policy EN 4: Design (specifies criteria that proposals should have regard to, including
the North Norfolk Design Guide and sustainable construction).
Policy EN 8: Protecting and enhancing the historic environment (prevents insensitive
development and specifies requirements relating to designated assets and other
valuable buildings).
MAIN ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
1. Impact on the Conservation Area.
2. Design.
APPRAISAL
Forge Cottage is the end terrace property occupying a corner plot fronting onto
Westwick Road at the junction with Vicarage Road. It is located close to the village
centre.
Worstead lies within the Countryside policy area, where Policy HO 8 allows for
extensions to existing dwellings where they would not result in a disproportionate
increase in the height and scale of the original building. Forge Cottage has already
been extended at some point during the mid-1970's with a two-storey extension to
the side. The proposal involves a modest extension to that part of the cottage. Given
its position at the rear of the property, and taking account of the screening from the
mature boundary hedging, the proposed extension would not appear particularly
prominent within its immediate surroundings. The design of the extension mirrors the
form of the rear elevations of the cottages along this terrace and with the
improvements suggested by the Conservation, Design and Landscape Manager
there are no design objections to the proposal. These would constitute minor
amendments in terms of the Committee's newly adopted practice and would be
required to be submitted in accordance with a strict timetable to ensure determination
within the statutory period.
The existing outbuilding (The Forge), proposed as an annexe, has a sloping lean-to
roof that is clearly not original and is in a state of disrepair. The building is
nonetheless considered worthy of retention. Its refurbishment with a pitched roof
would enhance its appearance within the Conservation Area as would the removal of
the unattractive more modern detached garage. The extension to the building is
suitably subordinate, and less than the footprint of the garage to be demolished. The
proposal would represent an overall improvement to the appearance of the building
and the site.
A previous application to refurbish the Forge, linking it to the existing garage for use
as a dwelling, was refused planning permission last year and subsequently
dismissed on appeal. The Inspector concluded that the amount of rebuilding and
extension would conflict with the Council's saved Local Plan Policy 29. Although the
Inspector dismissed the appeal, he did not agree that the proposal was
overdevelopment or that the design of the alterations proposed would not preserve
the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. It was also his view that the
restoration of the Forge justified rebuilding the roof. The current proposal is
considered sufficiently different from the previous, so as not to conflict with the
Inspector's findings.
In general terms, these proposals are considered to comply with Development Plan
policy. The view is that with some minor improvements to the extension, this and
conversion of the Forge, would enhance the character and appearance of the
Worstead Conservation Area.
Development Control Committee (East)
8
3 September 2009
RECOMMENDATION:Delegated authority to approve, subject to the submission of design
amendments suggested by the Conservation, Design and Landscape Manager
in accordance with a strict timetable and subject to conditions to include
approval of materials, removal of permitted development rights, restricting
occupancy of the annexe to be incidental to the use of Forge Cottage as a
single dwelling and as required by Norfolk Landscape Archaeology.
4.
APPLICATIONS APPROVED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS
ALBY - 20090557 - Alterations and erection of single- storey extension and
balcony; Woodstock Barn Middle Hill for Mr and Mrs Tedds
(Full Planning Permission)
ALBY - 20090600 - Demolition of existing garage and erection of single-storey
extension to provide annexe and erection of detached double garage;
Woolstoncroft Alby Hill for Mr Tiffany
(Full Planning Permission)
ALBY - 20090654 - Prior notification of intention to erect extension to
agricultural building; Church Farm Church Road for Alby Farming Company
(Prior Notification)
AYLMERTON - 20090582 - Erection of detached garage with office
accommodation and balcony above; The Canadas Roman Camp West Runton
for Mr and Mrs Tatam
(Full Planning Permission)
AYLMERTON - 20090604 - Erection of single-storey front extension; 1 Laurel
Farm Cottages Holt Road for Mr and Mrs Youngman
(Full Planning Permission)
BACTON - 20090643 - Erection of attached rear car port; Home Beach House
Walcott Road for Mr Bayley
(Full Planning Permission)
BACTON - 20090645 - Erection of single-storey rear extension; 79 Newlands
Estate for Mr Sayer
(Full Planning Permission)
CATFIELD - 20090638 - Change of use of annexe to residential dwelling;
Galloway House The Street for Mr Irving
(Full Planning Permission)
CROMER - 20090510 - Erection of first floor extension to provide self contained
flat; Food Fare Mill Road for Mr Singh
(Full Planning Permission)
CROMER - 20090539 - Erection of single-storey extension; 147 Overstrand
Road for Mr Lloyd
(Full Planning Permission)
Development Control Committee (East)
9
3 September 2009
FELBRIGG - 20090550 - Installation of replacement windows and secondary
double glazing; The Retreat Felbrigg Park for The National Trust
(Alteration to Listed Building)
FELBRIGG - 20090637 - Erection of one and a half storey side extension and
single storey rear extension; Sycamores Metton Road Cromer for Mr Bryant
(Full Planning Permission)
HICKLING - 20090563 - Erection of single-storey rear extension; Black Horse
Cottage The Green for Mr Pugh
(Full Planning Permission)
HORSEY - 20090591 - Erection of first floor rear extension; Nelson Head Public
House The Street for Mr Hewitt
(Full Planning Permission)
KNAPTON - 20090675 - Prior notification of intention to erect agricultural
storage container; Pigney's Wood Hall Lane for North Norfolk Community
Woodland Trust
(Prior Notification)
LESSINGHAM - 20090564 - Display of illuminated, pole mounted sign;
Duneside Bush Drive Eccles-On-Sea Bush Estate for Mr Hubbard
(Full Planning Permission)
MUNDESLEY - 20090579 - Erection of single-storey rear extension; 20 Warren
Drive for Mr Footitt
(Full Planning Permission)
MUNDESLEY - 20090606 - Variation of condition 6 of planning reference:
20071534 to permit retention of boundary wall and planting hedge behind; 12
Back Street for Mr Collins
(Full Planning Permission)
NEATISHEAD - 20090361 - Erection of single-storey front extension, twostorey rear extension and garage side extension; Swift Cottage Water Lane for
Mrs Heaffey
(Full Planning Permission)
NEATISHEAD - 20090527 - Erection of single-storey rear extension; The Manse
Chapel Road for Mrs Pairpoint
(Full Planning Permission)
NEATISHEAD - 20090627 - Erection of detached garage; The Chestnuts Church
Road for Mrs Simpson
(Full Planning Permission)
NEATISHEAD - 20090652 - Erection of single-storey side and rear extensions;
Caldarvan Common Road Threehammer Common for Ms Christensen
(Full Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20090647 - Erection of two-storey side extension; 1
Mission Cottage Happisburgh Road White Horse Common for Miss Reynolds
(Full Planning Permission)
Development Control Committee (East)
10
3 September 2009
NORTH WALSHAM - 20090674 - Change of use from A1 (retail) to D1
(chiropodist); 38 Vicarage Street for Mr Hayes
(Full Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20090628 - Erection of side conservatory; Little House
Little London for Mr and Mrs Chamberlain
(Full Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20081580 - Re-location of bridge over culvert and
construction of access road; Lyngate Industrial Estate Cornish Way for
Southrepps Development Ltd
(Full Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20090553 - Change of use from residential to B1 (office); 1
Carlton Farm Cottages Yarmouth Road for Mr Wright
(Full Planning Permission)
NORTH WALSHAM - 20090653 - Erection of detached games
room/workshop/summer- house; Borderlands, 49 Cromer Road for Mr Hart
(Full Planning Permission)
POTTER HEIGHAM - 20090556 - Erection of single-storey rear extension; Glenn
Haven Station Road for Mr Backhouse
(Full Planning Permission)
ROUGHTON - 20090576 - Installation of four conservation rooflights; Rogues
Barn Grove Farm Back Lane for Mr and Mrs Wilkins
(Full Planning Permission)
ROUGHTON - 20090577 - Installation of four conservation rooflights; Rogues
Barn Grove Farm Back Lane for Mr and Mrs Wilkins
(Alteration to Listed Building)
RUNTON - 20090607 - Installation of replacement shop front; Inglewood House
42 High Street East Runton for Mr and Mrs M Ashwell
(Full Planning Permission)
RUNTON - 20090517 - Retention of conservatory; Southways The Common
West Runton for Mr Brook
(Full Planning Permission)
RUNTON - 20090559 - Erection of single-storey garden room; Treehaven Sandy
Lane West Runton for Jeesal Residential Care
(Full Planning Permission)
SMALLBURGH - 20090601 - Internal alterations to rear extensions, provision of
additional windows, changing doors to windows and up-grading of cart shed;
Holly House Church Road for Mr and Mrs Paterson
(Alteration to Listed Building)
SMALLBURGH - 20090631 - Erection of one and a half storey rear extension;
Idaho Low Street for Mr Martins
(Full Planning Permission)
Development Control Committee (East)
11
3 September 2009
STALHAM - 20090555 - Conversion of two flats into three flats; 116 High Street
for Mr Woolsey
(Full Planning Permission)
STALHAM - 20090562 - Demolition of single-storey storage unit; 116 High
Street for Mr Woolsey
(Demolition in a Conservation Area)
STALHAM - 20090618 - Erection of single-storey front extension; 71 Lyndford
Road for Mr Galenski
(Full Planning Permission)
SUTTON - 20090632 - Erection of single-storey front extension; Avalon The
Street for Mr Batchelor
(Full Planning Permission)
SWANTON ABBOTT - 20090635 - Erection of single-storey rear extension; Hall
Farm Black Horse Road Skeyton for Mr Morton
(Full Planning Permission)
SWANTON ABBOTT - 20090636 - Internal alterations, installation of
replacement windows and erection of single-storey extension; Hall Farm Black
Horse Road Skeyton for Mr Morton
(Alteration to Listed Building)
SWANTON ABBOTT - 20090662 - Prior notification of intention to erect
agricultural building; land at Pitt Farm The Hill for Mr B J Crow
(Prior Notification)
TRUNCH - 20090580 - Construction of front bay window and pitched roof to
replace flat roof; 15 Primrose Close for Mr Jarvis
(Full Planning Permission)
TUNSTEAD - 20090538 - Insertion of two windows; 1 Laurel Farm Barns Market
Street for Mr Yonge
(Full Planning Permission)
TUNSTEAD - 20090596 - Variation of condition seven planning permission ref:
20080628 to allow for the first 2.45m of access to be constructed to Norfolk
County Council construction specification; Menwyth House Market Street for
Mr Rowe
(Full Planning Permission)
WICKMERE - 20090535 - Erection of agricultural storage building; Hall Farm
Goose Green for Mr Seaman
(Full Planning Permission)
WICKMERE - 20090545 - Erection of two-storey and single-storey extensions;
The Old Rectory Watery Lane for Mr and Mrs Buchan
(Full Planning Permission)
WITTON - 20090598 - Erection of two-storey and single-storey rear extensions;
Witton Bridge Cottage Stone Bridge Road Witton Bridge for Mr Haughton
(Full Planning Permission)
Development Control Committee (East)
12
3 September 2009
5.
APPLICATIONS REFUSED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS
ERPINGHAM - 20090566 - Erection of single-storey dwelling and garage and
stable block; Eagle Farm The Street for Mr Wright
(Full Planning Permission)
APPEALS SECTION
6.
NEW APPEALS
HAPPISBURGH - 20090308 - Raising of roof and construction of dormer
windows; Twee Cottage The Street for Mrs Huggins
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS
7.
PUBLIC INQUIRIES AND INFORMAL HEARINGS - PROGRESS
No items.
8.
WRITTEN REPRESENTATIONS APPEALS - PROGRESS
SUFFIELD - 20081718 - Retention of opening door in place of approved screen;
7 Cooks Farm Rectory Road Suffield for D and M Hickling Properties Ltd
9.
APPEAL DECISIONS
AYLMERTON - 20080817 - Removal of occupancy restriction; Edgewood Holt
Road for Mr C Cudmore
APPEAL DECISION :- ALLOWED
NORTH WALSHAM - 20081382 - Erection of single-storey dwelling; 3 Skeyton
Road for Mrs Fox
APPEAL DECISION :- DISMISSED
WALCOTT - 20081662 - Removal of condition 3 of planning application
reference: 20021117 to permit residential occupancy; White Farm Barn North
Walsham Road Happisburgh for Mr Kinsey
APPEAL DECISION :- ALLOWED
Development Control Committee (East)
13
3 September 2009