Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
Please Contact: Linda Yarham
Please email: linda.yarham@north-norfolk.gov.uk
Please Direct Dial on: 01263 516019
27 October 2015
A meeting of Planning Policy & Built Heritage Working Party will be held in the Council Chamber at
the Council Offices, Holt Road, Cromer on Monday 9 November 2015 at 10.00am.
At the discretion of the Chairman, a short break will be taken after the meeting has been running for
approximately one and a half hours.
Members of the public who wish to ask a question or speak on an agenda item are requested to arrive at
least 15 minutes before the start of the meeting. It will not always be possible to accommodate requests
after that time. This is to allow time for the Committee Chair to rearrange the order of items on the
agenda for the convenience of members of the public. Further information on the procedure for public
speaking can
be obtained from Democratic Services, Tel: 01263 516010, Email:
democraticservices@north-norfolk.gov.uk
Anyone attending this meeting may take photographs, film or audio-record the proceedings and report
on the meeting. Anyone wishing to do so must inform the Chairman. If you are a member of the public
and you wish to speak on an item on the agenda, please be aware that you may be filmed or
photographed.
Sheila Oxtoby
Chief Executive
To: Mrs S Arnold, Mrs A Claussen-Reynolds, Mrs J English, Mrs A Green, Mrs P Grove-Jones, Mr P
High, Mr N Pearce, Mr J Punchard, Mr R Reynolds, Mr S Shaw, Mrs V Uprichard
All other Members of the Council for information.
Members of the Management Team, appropriate Officers, Press and Public
If you have any special requirements in order to attend this meeting, please
let us know in advance
If you would like any document in large print, audio, Braille, alternative format or in
a different language please contact us
Chief Executive: Sheila Oxtoby
Corporate Directors: Nick Baker and Steve Blatch
Tel 01263 513811 Fax 01263 515042 Minicom 01263 516005
Email districtcouncil@north-norfolk.gov.uk Web site northnorfolk.org
AGENDA
1.
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE
To receive apologies for absence, if any.
2.
PUBLIC QUESTIONS
3.
MINUTES
(attached – p.1)
To approve as a correct record the Minutes of a meeting of the Working Party held on 12
October 2015.
4.
ITEMS OF URGENT BUSINESS
To determine any other items of business which the Chairman decides should be considered
as a matter of urgency pursuant to Section 100B(4)(b) of the Local Government Act 1972.
5.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Members are asked at this stage to declare any interests that they may have in any of the
following items on the agenda. The Code of Conduct for Members requires that declarations
include the nature of the interest and whether it is a disclosable pecuniary interest.
6.
PLANNING POLICY UPDATE
(Report – p.4)
Summary:
This report provides a summary of the work of the Planning
Policy Team and in particular the preparation of the new
Local Plan
Recommendations:
The report is for Information only
Cabinet Member(s)
Ward(s) affected
All members
All wards
Contact Officer, telephone number and email:
Mark Ashwell - Planning Policy Manager – 01263 516325 Mark.ashwell@north-norfolk.gov.uk
7.
(Report – p. 7)
HOUSING BILL UPDATE
Summary:
This report provides a summary of the Housing Bill insofar as
its provisions relate to the preparation of Local Plans,
Neighbourhood Planning, Starter Homes and the holding of
registers of brownfield land which is suitable for development.
Recommendations:
The report is for Information only
Cabinet Member(s)
Ward(s) affected
All members
All wards
Contact Officer, telephone number and email:
Mark Ashwell- Planning Policy Manager – 01263 516325
8.
REGULATION 18 CONSULTATION RESPONSES
(Report – p. 10)
(Appendix 1 – p. 12)
Summary:
This report provides a summary of the responses received in
relation to the first stage of public consultation on the new local
plan (Regulation 18 Consultation).
Recommendations:
No formal decisions are required. Members are asked to
note the comments made together with the officer
responses which will inform the later stages of Plan
preparation.
Cabinet Member(s)
Ward(s) affected
All members
All wards
Contact Officer, telephone number and email:
Mark Ashwell- Planning Policy Manager – 01263 516325
9.
DRAFT STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT (SCI) CONSULTATION RESPONSES
Report – p. 33)
(Appendix 2 – p. 35; Appendix 3 – p. 63; Appendix 4 – p. 65)
Summary:
This report provides a summary of the responses received to the
public consultation on the draft Statement of Community
Involvement (SCI) and suggests updates to the document where
appropriate.
Conclusions:
The Draft SCI provides a clear and accessible guide on how the
local planning authority will endeavour to encourage widespread
involvement in the preparation of planning policy documents and in
the determination of planning Applications.
Recommendations:
That the amendments outlined in Appendix 4 are incorporated
into the SCI and that it is recommended to Cabinet for
approval.
Cabinet Member(s)
All Members
Ward(s) affected
All Wards
Martha Moore, Planning Policy Officer
Tel: 01263 516084
Email: Martha.moore@north-norfolk.gov.uk
10.
EXCLUSION OF PRESS AND PUBLIC
To pass the following resolution (if necessary):“That under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the press and public be
excluded from the meeting for the following items of business on the grounds that they
involve the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Part I of Schedule 12A (as
amended) to the Act.”
11.
TO CONSIDER ANY EXEMPT MATTERS ARISING FROM CONSIDERATION OF THE
PUBLIC BUSINESS OF THE AGENDA
Agenda item
12 OCTOBER 2015
Minutes of a meeting of the PLANNING POLICY & BUILT HERITAGE WORKING PARTY
held in the Council Chamber, Council Offices, Holt Road, Cromer at 10.00 am when there
were present:
Councillors
Mrs A Arnold (Chairman)
R Reynolds (Vice-Chairman)
Mrs A Claussen-Reynolds
Mrs A Green
Mrs P Grove-Jones
Mrs V Uprichard
P High
N Pearce
S Shaw
Ms M Prior – observing
Officers
Mr M Ashwell – Planning Policy Manager
22.
APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE
Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Mrs J English and J Punchard.
23.
MINUTES
The Minutes of the meeting held on 12 October 2015 were approved as a correct
record and signed by the Chairman.
24.
ITEMS OF URGENT BUSINESS
The Chairman stated that there were no items of urgent business which she wished
to bring before the Working Party.
25.
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
No interests were declared.
26.
PLANNING POLICY UPDATE
The Planning Policy Manager presented a summary of the work of the Planning
Policy Team, with particular focus on the review of the Local Plan.
The Planning Policy Manager reported that since preparation of the report, the
consultation on the Regulation 18 Notice had finished and 50-60 responses had been
received. All statutory consultees had responded. The results of the consultation
would be reported to the next meeting.
The Planning Policy Manager answered Members’ questions.

Guidance would be sent to Parish & Town Councils regarding site selection;
however they would be able to put forward any sites they wished to as nothing
would be ruled out at this stage.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
1
9 November 2015
3












No decision had been made as to selected villages.
All public landowners would be invited to put sites forward.
It was open to anybody with landowning interests to put sites forward for any type
of development. Landowners would also be approached if sites were identified
which might be suitable. Members were welcome to invite landowners to register
their interests.
Sites which were currently allocated for employment could be put forward for
consideration as residential sites.
It had been a deliberate choice to allocate too much employment land in the
current plan to give people a choice. Not all the land had been taken up. There
was now a need to balance it against housing and consider whether to allocate
housing on greenfield sites or on brownfield sites which had been unused for
some time.
Whilst former RAF bases appeared to be good sites, they were not sustainable.
There was a need to consider the impact on nearby towns if large amounts of
growth were allocated on such sites, such as the impact of RAF West Raynham
on Fakenham or RAF Coltishall on North Walsham. If a high housing target were
set then it might be necessary to consider these sites to meet demand.
Contaminated land would not necessarily be excluded as it could be cleaned up.
Some issues, such as major flooding, were likely to lead sites being excluded.
There would be indicators of relative sustainability. Criteria would be scored to
assist in the selection process, but some criteria may carry more weight than
others.
The process would be evidence based and not choice based. Criteria had to be
objective and consideration given to the implications.
It was intended to invite local Members for the towns to consider some of these
issues.
The SHMA did not treat annexes as separate dwellings.
Each authority was at a different stage in planning. The rate of growth over the
last 20 years in the three large authorities of Norwich, South Norfolk and
Broadland was broadly similar. There was a question as to how future growth
could be accommodated. Norwich would be unable to meet its need and it would
have to be accommodated elsewhere.
The Chairman stated that if no evidence of co-operation could be shown the
Council’s Plan would fail.
Councillor R Reynolds stated that careful consideration would need to be given to the
area between Fakenham and Kings Lynn.
The Working Party noted the report.
27.
FIVE YEAR LAND SUPPLY - RECENT APPEAL DECISION
The Planning Policy Manager outlined the recent appeal decision in respect of a
planning application for up to 170 dwellings at Holt (Gladman) and its implications for
the Council’s five-year land supply.
Councillor R Reynolds stated that a 5.4 year land supply had been confirmed and the
Council had to work well to achieve the figures.
Councillor P W High thanked the Planning Policy Manager and his team for all their
work, which was appreciated by all residents. The Chairman also thanked the
Planning Policy Manager on behalf of the Working Party.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
2
9 November 2015
In answer to a question by Councillor Mrs P Grove-Jones, the Planning Policy
Manager stated that large regional housebuilders tended to concentrate on bigger
sites (over 50 dwellings) but smaller sites might be considered depending on
location. It had been difficult to deliver very large allocations and it was thought that
this may be due to a number of factors such as land assembly, infrastructure costs
etc, which would involve a number of landowners and developers. The difficulty in
delivering large sites would be considered by the Duty to Co-operate Forum.
The Working Party discussed issues relating to housing targets.
RESOLVED
That an Addendum to the Five Year Land Supply Statement be
published to draw attention to the appeal decision.
The meeting closed at 11.35 am.
_______________________
CHAIRMAN
9 November 2015
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
3
9 November 2015
Agenda Item No____6_______
Planning Policy Update
Summary:
This report provides a summary of the work of the
Planning Policy Team and in particular the preparation
of the new Local Plan
Recommendations:
The report is for Information only
Cabinet Member(s)
Ward(s) affected
All members
All wards
Contact Officer, telephone number and email:
Mark Ashwell- Planning Policy Manager – 01263 516325
1.
Introduction
1.1
This report provides a short up-date in relation to the work of the planning
policy team with a particular focus on the review of the Local Plan.
2.
Regulation 18 Notification
2.1
The Regulation 18 consultation period closed on the 9 October. This asked
for views on the content which should be included in the next Local Plan. A
report of the representations made is included on this Agenda.
3.
Statement of Community Involvement (SCI).
3.1
A similar consultation in relation to the Statement of Community Involvement
also closed on the 9 October. This document explains how the Council will
engage with the public and others during the preparation of the Plan and
when planning applications are made. A report on the representations made
appears on this Agenda.
4.
Local Plan Evidence
4.1
The Strategic Housing Market Assessment, is nearing completion and will
shortly be published. This document will help to determine both the quantity
and type of new homes that are likely to be required in the District over the
plan period. The study was jointly commission by five planning authorities and
has been overseen by the Duty to Co-operate Members forum and the
Strategic Planning Officer Group which includes representatives of all Norfolk
Authorities.
4.2
Cabinet agreed to accept the report at its meeting on the 5 October and it is
currently expected that all of the commissioning partners will jointly publish
the study by the end of November.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
4
9 November 2015
5.
Duty to Co-operate
5.1
The Duty to Co-operate is a legal requirement when preparing a Local Plan
and is being discharged via a Members Forum supported by a Strategic
Planning Officers group drawn from each of the Norfolk Authorities. The
forum is preparing the Norfolk Strategic Framework which is expected to be
published in around 18 months. This will consider evidence such as the joint
Strategic Housing Market Assessment, commission further evidence as
necessary, and seek to establish where, and in relation to which issues, a cooperative approach involving more than a single planning authority may be
desirable. The Framework will establish if growth in one area will have
impacts in other areas, for example, by using limited infrastructure capacity.
5.2
The Forum has recently appointed a Project Manager and Support Officer
who are being hosted by Norwich City Council on behalf of the partner
authorities and officer level working groups have been established to consider
specific areas including housing, the economy, infrastructure and delivery.
6.
Next Steps in Plan Preparation – The Call for Sites.
6.1
In the next stage of the process the team will be focusing on the identification
of sites that might be suitable for future development. In the first instance this
involves what is referred to as a ‘call for sites’ which entails providing the
opportunity to land owners, developers, local businesses, communities and
others to suggest sites for development. The initial stage is designed to
establish what is called unconstrained capacity. This means that sites can be
suggested in any location irrespective of current policies and other known
constraints. To ensure that there is a broad selection of options the Council
can independently identify sites which it thinks might be suitable. The call for
sites is not limited to housing proposals and will include all other types of
development.
6.2
It is planned to start this process before the end of this year or early in the
new-year. Those wishing to register sites for consideration will have an initial
3 month period to do so and will need to complete a specific registration form
and provide basic details of their proposal.
7.
Town Council Workshops
7.1
Early in the new- year it is proposed to hold workshops with each of the larger
Town and Parish Councils. These are intended to:



Provide a further opportunity to explain the plan making process and
timetable.
Provide Town and Parish Councils with an opportunity to identify the
issues which they consider should be addressed in their communities.
Identify those sites or broad areas which Council’s consider may be
suitable options to consider for development.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
5
9 November 2015
8.
Proposed Working Party Site Visits.
8.1
It is proposed that Working Party site visits will commence in December. It is
suggested that visits take place from 1pm on the date of each Working Party
Meeting with the itinerary agreed at the previous meeting. Visits following the
December 7th meeting will be to the sites that were allocated in the current
Site Allocations Development Plan in North Walsham (HLfoods), Stalham
(Church Farm), and Hoveton.
9.
Recommendation : This report is for information only.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
6
9 November 2015
Agenda Item No_____7______
HOUSING BILL UPDATE
Summary:
This report provides a summary of the Housing Bill
insofar as its provisions relate to the preparation of
Local Plans, Neighbourhood Planning, Starter Homes
and the holding of registers of brownfield land which is
suitable for development.
Recommendations:
The report is for Information only
Cabinet Member(s)
Ward(s) affected
All members
All wards
Contact Officer, telephone number and email:
Mark Ashwell- Planning Policy Manager – 01263 516325
1. Introduction
1.1 The Government's Housing Bill has been published and is currently passing
through Parliament. It is likely to secure royal assent sometime early in the newyear. Many of its provisions will then require the publication of supporting
Regulations to make clear the requirements of the Bill and enact various
sections. It may also lead to further changes to the National Planning Policy
Framework. The Bill includes a number of significant provisions relating to Local
Plans, Neighbourhood Plans, and Starter/Affordable Homes as well as
introducing a new requirement to maintain registers of brownfield land which is
suitable for development.
1.2 This report summarises the provisions of the Bill.
2. Local Plans
2.1 The Productivity Plan published just after the Summer Budget stated that it is vital
that local planning authorities use their powers to put in place local plans that set
the framework for the homes and jobs local people need. The Bill includes a
small number of measures which increase the powers of the secretary of state to
intervene in the Local Plan process.
2.2 There is currently no statutory requirement to prepare a Local Plan. In the Bill the
Secretary of State may make a direction relating to the subject matter of the
documents specified in the Local Development Scheme (LDS). This essentially
gives the Secretary of State the power to direct that a Local Plan is prepared and
direct that it should include specific content.
2.3 The Bill also includes a new power for the Secretary of State to 'suspend' a local
plan examination to consider specified matters. This will allow the examination of
Plans to be delayed rather than finding them unsound.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
7
9 November 2015
2.4 The Government had stated that they will intervene if Councils fail to have an
adopted plan in place by 2017. In this respect, the Bill's provisions will amend
section 21 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 which will
dramatically increase the scope of the Secretary of State's existing default
intervention power in the local plan making process. It is expected that the
Government will use these powers to step in if plans are not in place by 2017
although it seems unlikely that government would use such powers in
circumstances where Authorities have made significant progress.
2.5 In a separate announcement the government has confirmed the formation of a
‘Local Plans Expert Group’ which has been tasked with recommending how the
current plan making process could be streamlined. The group is currently seeking
views and hopes to report early in 2016. Any significant revision to the current
plan making process is likely to require new regulations which now seem unlikely
before summer 2016.
3. Neighbourhood Plans
3.1 The Bill will also streamline the neighbourhood plan system by introducing
powers to allow automatic decisions on designation of neighbourhood plan areas,
introducing time periods for making key decisions by the LPA, and allowing the
Secretary of State to intervene on the decision to send a neighbourhood plan to
referendum. Collectively these measures are intended to speed up the process of
preparing a Neighbourhood Plan by making sure that local authorities reach
decisions within a reasonable period at the various stages of the process.
4. Starter Homes and Affordable Housing
4.1 The Bill defines starter homes as those which are made available to first time
buyers, under the age of forty and at a discount of 20% on open market value
subject to an upper price limit of £250,000. Existing Planning Policy Guidance
already provides for Starter Homes on exception sites but the Bill confers a new
legal duty on LPAs to carry out its relevant planning functions with a view to
promoting the supply of Starter Homes in England.
4.2 The Secretary of State will have the power to make regulations to provide that a
LPA may only grant planning permission for specified residential development if
the Starter Homes requirement is met. The requirements are to be set out in
regulations but could provide that a LPA may only grant planning permission for
residential development above a certain size if a Section 106 agreement provides
for a certain number of starter homes or contribution towards the authority's
provision of these. In this respect starter homes would be treated much the same
way as affordable homes.
4.3 It had been thought that starter homes would be included within the planning
definition of ‘affordable’ housing thus allowing them to be provided instead of
other types of affordable tenures such as social and affordable rent properties.
However the Bill makes no reference to any changes to the definition of
affordable housing as trailed by the Prime Minister. However it is thought likely
that this change will probably be introduced through an amendment to the NPPF.
This would be a very significant change as for the first time affordability would be
determined by reference to the local price of homes rather than local incomes as
is currently the case.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
8
9 November 2015
5. Brownfield Land and Permissions in Principle
5.1 The Bill requires local authorities to prepare, maintain and publish local registers
of specified land (Brownfield Registers). It is not clear what land will qualify for
inclusion on such registers but it is assumed that size, location, and existing use
qualifications will be applied. The precise details are likely to be included in new
regulations. Once introduced local authorities will be subject to a legal duty to
maintain a register of sites which the government intends are likely to be granted
a new type of automatic planning permission (see below).
5.2 Provisions are also included to give the Secretary of State the power, by a
development order, to grant permission in principle to land allocated for
development in a qualifying document. This provision gives the Secretary of State
the power to grant an automatic planning permission (similar to outline planning
permission). Initially the government intends only that land allocated in a
brownfield register, development plan documents or neighbourhood plans will be
capable of obtaining permission in principle. A development order would set out
the type and scope of the development which is permitted. It is understood that
the current intention is for the provisions to apply to minor housing development
(fewer than 10 units) but could be extended to larger sites in due course.
5.3 This may mean that if land is allocated in a Local Plan and satisfies the
requirements the development order will automatically grant permission in
principle. The Development Management Procedure Order 2015 will be amended
to set out the process for applicants and local authorities and the type and scope
of development which can be approved in this way. The government will consult
on the details of the application process for the technical detailed consent in due
course. The technical consent (similar to a reserved matters planning application)
will be required before development can commence.
5.4 As outlined above many of the Bills provisions will require enabling regulations
which will provide further details.
6. Recommendation : This report is for information only.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
9
9 November 2015
Agenda Item No_____8______
REGULATION 18 CONSULTATION RESPONSES
Summary:
This report provides a summary of the responses received in
relation to the first stage of public consultation on the new local
plan (Regulation 18 Consultation).
Recommendations:
No formal decisions are required. Members are asked to
note the comments made together with the officer
responses which will inform the later stages of Plan
preparation.
Cabinet Member(s)
Ward(s) affected
All members
All wards
Contact Officer, telephone number and email:
Mark Ashwell - Planning Policy Manager – 01263 516325
1.
Introduction
1.1
This report provides a summary of responses made to the Regulation 18 consultation
which seeks views on the issues which need to be addressed in the new Local Plan.
2.
Regulation 18 Notification
2.1
The Town and Country (Local Planning) (England) Regulations (2012) set out the
detailed legislative process for preparation and adoption of development plan documents
(called “local plans” in the Regulations), including the requirements for consultation and
the availability of documents throughout the whole process.
2.2
Regulation 18 of the Local Planning Regulations (2012) requires LPAs to notify specific
and general consultees and all others whom the LPA considers to have an interest, on
the subject areas to be considered in the new Local Plan - The notification essentially
asks ‘Do you think the Council has identified the right issues to be addressed in the new
Local Plan?’
2.3
The Council published a consultation document on the 17th of August for an eight week
period indicating that it proposed to prepare a new Local Plan covering the period 20162036 and that it would be considering all policy areas and making new allocations of
development land to ensure that all objectively assessed development needs were met.
During the consultation period the Council held a launch event for Town and Parish
Council’s and officers have visited a number of Parishes over the period to provide
general advice. Responders were able to use a specific response form or simply write to
the Council with their views, or representations could be made using a web based
consultation system.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
10
9 November 2015
2.4
In total 46 representations were made. Some Parishes have asked for a longer period of
time to reply and this has been agreed. Given that the Council has indicated that it is
proposing to undertake a wholesale review of the current Plan it is perhaps unsurprising
that there were no representations which suggest that the Council had failed to identify
significant issues which should be considered. In a few cases responders have taken the
opportunity to make specific proposals either in relation to a policy approach or to
promote the development of specific sites and these will be considered later in the
process.
2.5
All representations received to-date are attached as Appendix 1. There is no need to
respond to individual representations at this stage as the main purpose is to ensure that
the Council is focussed on the main issues which should be included in the Plan. The
appendix includes some brief officer comments confirming how a particular issue will be
considered.
3.
Recommendations
3.1
Members are asked to note the comments made together with the officer responses
which will inform the later stages of Plan preparation.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
11
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
LPS 01
D Hurdle
N/a
Comment
It is necessary for much more housing to be built to
address the national housing crisis.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. The settlement hierarchy in the
existing Core Strategy (Sept 2008) will be reviewed and
appropriate consideration given to provision for growth in all
settlements.
We should be encouraging less car use and more
sustainable methods of transport. Improvements
must be secured through planning applications, for
example, securing cycle paths, bus shelters etc.
ACCEPTED: We will be reviewing our transport policies and
considering how we can best promote sustainable transport
modes. In addition we will also be reviewing developer
contributions from development.
The Council could consider working on a joint plan
with neighbouring authorities to secure efficiencies.
ACCEPTED: This has been discussed under the Duty to Cooperate.
In order to promote joint working a number of evidence
documents will be prepared jointly under the Duty where these
affect strategic issues with cross-boundary implications. A
Strategic Framework document will be prepared to address
significant cross boundary issues.
Explanation to residents is needed about the
Government’s proposals to intervene if a Local Plan
is not in place by 2017.
ACCEPTED: The Council considers that this announcement affects
the 15% of authorities who currently have no local plan and
therefore NNDC is not affected. If this position changes it will be
reflected in our Local Development Scheme (LDS). Nevertheless
the Council aims to produce a new plan by 2017
Engaging with visitors is essential as they form a
large part of the district’s economy.
ACCEPTED: The Council recently consulted on a draft Statement of
Community Involvement (SCI) which sets out how we intend to
consult with all stakeholders during plan-making and on planning
applications. Local tourism boards, and other tourism related
groups/organisations will be consulted in accordance with the
Local Planning Regulations (2012).
Wording in policies such as ‘consider’ is too weak.
You should seek to ‘provide’ or ‘secure’.
ACCEPTED: At this stage the broad subjects to be included in the
plan are being considered. When polices are developed the
Council acknowledges that the wording will be critical to how that
1
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
12
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
LPS 02
P Mills
N/a
Comment
It is important that we accommodate sustainable
housing growth and help mitigate against the risks of
climate change including local sea flooding. The
impact of climate change on local communities
should be carefully considered.
policy is interpreted and implemented.
ACCEPTED: The Council is likely to publish a Strategic Flood Risk
Assessment to provide evidence on flood risk throughout the
district. This evidence document, alongside other strategies such
as the Coastline Management Plan would help inform any future
policies on climate change and flood risk.
Promoting local employment is important,
particularly working from home.
LPS 03
Historic England
(Kayleigh Wood)
N/a
Comment
Imperative to have well informed policies which
adequately cover the protection and enhancement
of the Historic Environment which is part of the
thread of sustainable development in the NPPF. The
Historic Environment forms a key role in the main
aims and vision for the district and this should be
taken forward to 2036. The Historic Environment
should be taken forward as a topic in its own right.
Specific policies should include the following (not
exclusive):
• Acknowledging, protecting and improving the
Significance of Heritage Assets (both designated
and non-designated)
• Acknowledging protecting and improving the
Setting of Heritage Assets (both designated and
non-designated)
• Known and unknown archaeology (both
designated and non-designated)
• Intangible elements of the Historic Environment
such as Cultural Heritage, sense of place, sense of
time depth, etc.
• Locally significant buildings
• Conservation Areas
ACCEPTED: A ‘Business Growth and Investment Opportunities
Study’ has been commissioned and is currently at draft stage. The
document considers the needs of existing businesses, establishes
land availability for expansion and growth and seeks to ascertain
opportunities for investment. The potential for live/work units will
be considered in policy development.
ACCEPTED: The Council acknowledges the NPPF requirements with
regard to the historic environment. We will consider the need for a
specific policy on the Historic Environment when developing policy
options. The required areas for consideration are noted and will be
considered.
2
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
13
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
• Registered Parks and Gardens
• Opportunities regarding Heritage At Risk
LPS 04
LPS 06
R Hayward
E Purdy
N/a
N/a
Comments
Comment
We are interested in general housing distribution
and specific sites.
ACCEPTED: Historic England will be notified of all policy
development and appraisal of specific sites.
The development of appropriate indicators for the
Sustainability Appraisal is essential.
ACCEPTED: We would welcome engagement with Historic England
on the development of Sustainability Appraisal indicators and will
consult with them as appropriate throughout the process.
ACCEPTED: All proposed development sites and all policies will be
assessed against sustainability criteria to ensure that development
is directed to the most appropriate locations. Policy options will be
considered to protect and enhance all natural habitats.
Nevertheless some development in the AONB may be necessary to
address identified needs.
Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) and
other natural habitats not covered by European
designations should be protected in the Plan.
Landscape and farming should be considered when
planning for housing. Housing should not be allowed
to sprawl into the countryside in order to preserve
the landscape and protect our rural economy.
ACCEPTED: The types of a development which are considered
acceptable in the countryside will be considered.
Regarding housing, priority should be given to
developing brownfield sites, active steps made
towards reusing existing empty homes and other
buildings through conversion.
ACCEPTED: There is a clear Government drive to reuse brownfield
land. The Council is preparing to publish a ‘call for sites’ towards
the end of 2015. At that time sites can be put forward for
consideration of their development potential.
New housing development must be affordable
(either for rental or buying). Mechanisms should be
put in place to avoid the proliferation of second
homes.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. The use of dwellings as second
homes does not fall under planning control.
Flexibility for change of use to enhance our market
towns should be considered.
ACCEPTED: Any new policy on uses within town centres will be
flexible and will reflect current permitted development rights for
change of use.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
Small villages need new affordable homes to avoid
3
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
14
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
LPS 07
L de Soissons
N/a
Comment
LPS 08
Church Commissioners
for England
(Represented by WYG)
N/a
Comment
Summary of representation
Council response
stagnation and isolation of the elderly.
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements.
NNDC land at Bears Road, Paston – highways
objections can be overcome if a one-way restriction
is used.
ACCEPTED: The Council is preparing to publish a ‘call for sites’
towards the end of 2015. At that time sites can be put forward for
consideration of their development potential.
Need housing sites available in land as a result of the
retreating coastline. A new coast road at Walcott is
needed, further in land.
ACCEPTED: The Council is likely to publish a Strategic Flood Risk
Assessment to provide evidence on flood risk throughout the
district. This evidence document, alongside other strategies such
as the Coastline Management Plan would help inform any future
policies on climate change, flood risk and coastal erosion. The
adequacy of the highway network will be considered alongside
policy development and consideration of sites for development.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements.
The concept of Service villages should be reconsidered. Currently identified service villages have
taken on the burden of too much development.
Other villages should be allowed to grow. The
majority of development should go to larger towns
where infrastructure exists already.
Strategic matters should focus on:
• The level of housing development which can be
accommodated in the district (OAN)
• Provision for economic development and a
growing local economy
• Protection of European nature conservation sites
Consideration should be given to developing a
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. A ‘Business Growth and
Investment Opportunities Study’ has been commissioned by NNDC
and is currently at draft stage. The document considers the needs
of existing businesses within the district, establishes land
availability for expansion of existing businesses and seeks to
ascertain opportunities for growth and investment. The Council is
currently scoping the evidence required to support production of
the Local Plan and it is likely that a Habitat Regulations Assessment
and corresponding Appropriate Assessment will be required to
consider impacts of development on European nature
conservation sites.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
4
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
15
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
LPS 09
Mobile Operators
Association
(Represented by Mono
Consultants Limited)
N/a
Comment
LPS 10
The Theatres Trust
N/a
Comment
LPS 11
S Dreary
N/a
Comment
LPS 12
Broadland District
Council
N/a
Comment
LPS 13
Broads Authority
N/a
Comment
Summary of representation
Council response
strategy for key transport networks and other key
infrastructure projects within the district to support
the allocation of strategic sites and ensure future
development is sustainable and well integrated.
It is important that there is a specific
telecommunications policy within the Local Plan.
National guidance recognises this, as does the NPF
(paragraphs 42 and 43). (Outline policy included in
response).
The Local Plan must contain a policy to safeguard
and protect existing community and cultural
facilities, as well as encouraging new ones. This is
advocated in the NPPF at paragraph 70. (Outline
policy included in response).
We need increased facilities for tourism in the
district (more car parks and camp sites).
to support production of the Local Plan. It is likely that a Strategic
Infrastructure Assessment will be prepared under the Duty to
Cooperate and a Local Infrastructure Assessment will be required.
Housing should be for local people, not to relieve
need in Norwich. More rented accommodation is
needed in villages. Too many houses are being sold
for holiday use.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. Following publication,
discussions will be had with neighbouring authorities about the
distribution of housing across the housing market area (HMA) and
appropriate member endorsement sought. The settlement
hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy (Sept 2008) will be reviewed
and appropriate consideration given to provision for growth in all
settlements. The use of dwellings as holiday homes does not fall
under planning control.
NOTED
The Council does not wish to comment at this stage
but would be happy to engage in the future in
accordance with the Duty to Cooperate.
No comments on the Regulation 18 document but
areas for consideration during policy development
have been proposed.
ACCEPTED: The Council acknowledges the NPPF requirement to
include a telecommunications policy in the Local Plan. The
enclosed proposed policy wording is welcomed and will be
considered during policy development.
ACCEPTED: The Council acknowledges the NPPF requirement to
include a policy on community and cultural facilities in the Local
Plan. The enclosed proposed policy wording is welcomed and will
be considered during policy development.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. The need for a Tourism
Study will be considered.
NOTED
5
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
16
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
LPS 14
Equality and Human
Rights Commission
N/a
Comment
ACCEPTED: An Equalities Impact Assessment will be undertaken at
each stage of plan preparation as required by the Equalities duty.
LPS 15
Bacton & Edingthorpe
Parish Council
Elaine Pugh, Clerk
N/a
Comment
LPAs have obligations under the Public Sector
Equality Duty (PSED) in the Equalities Act 2010 to
consider the effects of their policies and decision on
people sharing particular protected characteristics.
The Parish Council is keen to promote both
affordable and private development in the parish to
attract young families to help protect local services
and facilities. The re-use of rural buildings would be
welcomed.
There is poor drainage infrastructure which should
be addressed.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. The need for a Strategic
Infrastructure Assessment and/or Local Infrastructure Assessment
will be considered.
The introduction of CIL would be welcomed to help
Parishes.
The Parish has suffered with no development in
recent years. The Parish is keen to promote private
development (there is enough affordable housing
development and more of a balance should be
struck). The reuse of rural buildings should be
promoted.
ACCEPTED: There are currently no plans to adopt a CIL charging
schedule.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements. This will include looking
at the re-use of existing buildings
The introduction of CIL would be welcomed to help
Parishes.
The Parish is keen to see more affordable housing in
the area and to see it used for local people. The reuse of rural buildings as dwellings is welcomed.
ACCEPTED: There are currently no plans to adopt a CIL charging
schedule.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements. This will include looking
at the re-use of existing buildings.
Concerned about the widening of Back Lane as a
result of current allocation ROU03.
NOT ACCEPTED: The part-widening of Back Lane was agreed under
the planning application for this allocated site.
The introduction of CIL would be welcomed to help
Parishes.
ACCEPTED: There are currently no plans to adopt a CIL charging
schedule.
LPS 16
LPS 17
Gimmingham Parish
Council
Roughton Parish
Council
N/a
N/a
Comment
Comment
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements. This will include looking
at the re-use of existing buildings
6
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
17
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
LPS 18
Southrepps Parish
Council
Para 1.3
Objection
There is a need to ensure that with development
come facilities. New development should be located
in larger towns where infrastructure exists to cope
with increased demand.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. It is likely that a Strategic
Infrastructure Assessment will be prepared under the Duty to
Cooperate and a Local Infrastructure Assessment will be required.
The concept of service villages is flawed as some
villages have been denied development as a result.
This means that smaller villages have suffered with
an “aged” population. The re-use of rural buildings
should be considered.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements. This will include looking
at the re-use of existing buildings.
The introduction of CIL would be welcomed to help
Parishes.
ACCEPTED: There are currently no plans to adopt a CIL charging
schedule.
Southrepps Parish Council Objects to being included
as a service village in any new plan.
ACCEPTED: The Parish Council’s objection is noted. The settlement
hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy (Sept 2008) will be reviewed
and appropriate consideration given to provision for growth in all
settlements. This will include looking at the re-use of existing
buildings.
NOTED
LPS 19
Witton and Ridlington
Parish Council
N/a
Comment
LPS 20
Norfolk County
Council,
Community and
Environmental Services
N/a
Comment
LPS 21
Natural England
N/a
Comment
The Parish Council has no wish to accommodate new
housing within its boundary due to a lack of facilities
and infrastructure.
The Reg 18 document should contain an
infrastructure delivery chapter outlining the policies
to be included in the emerging local plan to identify
what infrastructure is required and how it will be
funded.
Issues and opportunities for the natural environment
should be addressed with particular emphasis on
designated environmental assets. A strategic
approach should be taken with regard to protection
and enhancement of the natural environment with
the aim of achieving a net gain in biodiversity.
Should be based on up to date evidence.
The impact of all topic areas on the Area of
Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) should be
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. It is likely that a Strategic
Infrastructure Assessment will be prepared under the Duty to
Cooperate and a Local Infrastructure Assessment will be required.
ACCEPTED: The Council is aware of the requirements of the
Conservation of Habitats and Species regulations (2010) and will
carry out the appropriate assessments and screening as required.
We would welcome discussion with Natural England on this. Under
the Duty to Cooperate evidence on infrastructure, including green
infrastructure is to be prepared to facilitate plan-making. All
proposed development sites and all policies will be assessed
against sustainability criteria to ensure that development is
directed to the most appropriate locations. The Sustainability
7
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
18
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
LPS 22
LPS 23
Respondent
Breckland District
Council
Norfolk Coast
Partnership
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
N/a
Comment
N/a
Comment
Summary of representation
Council response
considered. The AONB is a strategic matter omitted
form para 2.2. Consideration of the AONB should
also take into account the impacts of development
on its setting.
There are a number of environmental considerations
which should be considered when allocating sites for
development:
 AONB;
 Heritage Coast;
 Locally and regionally designated sites for
geodiversity and biodiversity;
 Landscape character;
 UK BAP habitats and protected species;
 Sites with opportunities for biodiversity
gain;
 Ancient woodland, and;
 Access to greenspace.
NNDC will need to carry out a screening assessment
under the Conservation of Habitats and Species
regulations (2010).
No comments at this time.
Appraisal (SA) will include criteria to assess economic, social and
environmental factors, and is likely to look at location within, or
adjacent to, the AONB.
Many challenges facing the district including
managing and adapting to coastal change and
climate change, maintaining environmental quality
and balancing this with the need for housing and
economic growth, and achieving truly sustainable
built development.
NOTED
The local plan must consider the need to pursue the
conservation and enhancement of the AONB and the
implications of accommodating growth within it and
in settlements adjacent to it. This should be
reflected in the town strategies. Within the AONB
economic development and employment growth
ACCEPTED: All proposed development sites and all policies will be
assessed against sustainability criteria to ensure that development
is directed to the most appropriate locations. The Sustainability
Appraisal (SA) will include criteria to assess economic, social and
environmental factors, and is likely to look at location within, or
adjacent to, the AONB.
NOTED
8
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
19
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
should not override the requirement to protect and
enhance the scenic beauty of the natural
environment. How the objectively assessed need for
housing and economic needs are met, specifically
within the AONB, should be considered. The
implications of meeting housing needs in the AONB,
and national and international designated sites
should be considered when determining where
development should go.
The replacement dwellings policy needs
consideration.
There may be a need for a policy covering NPPF
paragraph 55 dwellings.
Conservation and enhancement of the natural and
historic environment should have a high profile in
the new plan. Consideration of the roll-back of
settlements, if necessary into the AONB, whilst
maintaining the character and environmental quality
should be included.
LPS 24
Duchy of Cornwall
N/a
Comment
LPS 25
Holkham Estate
N/a
Comment
When monitoring, an assessment of whether
development has contributed positively or otherwise
to the new vision for the district could be included.
No specific comments at this stage.
The district faces many challenges including
providing enough homes to meet objectively
assessed need (OAN) in appropriate and sustainable
locations which ensuring the area’s natural
environmental qualities are protected.
ACCEPTED: The Council will be considering policy options with
regard to replacement dwellings.
ACCEPTED: The NPPF makes clear that policies in National policy
shouldn’t be repeated in local plans. The Council will consider
whether any additional direction is needed in the local plan with
regard to paragraph 55 dwellings.
ACCEPTED: The need to address coastal erosion and resulting rollback of existing uses and communities will be considered when
developing policy options. The Council acknowledges that in areas
such as the AONB further consideration should be given to the
potential impact on the natural and historic environment.
ACCEPTED: The Council will consider appropriate monitoring
indicators alongside development of policies.
NOTED
NOTED
9
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
20
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
LPS 26
Respondent
C Hipperson
Policy/
paragraph
N/a
Nature of
rep
Comment
Summary of representation
Council response
The vision in the Core Strategy remains valid
although the amount of development to be
accommodated is as yet unknown. The Council
should consider the role of smaller settlements and
not preserve the current hierarchy in aspic. Village
and hamlets can also grow where local communities
see the merits of controlled local development and
the plan framework should be flexible enough to
achieve this. The OAN needs should reflect the
market housing area (which may not be the same as
the local authority boundary).
Consideration of housing for estate workers should
be made, potentially in isolated locations.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. Following publication,
discussions will be had with neighbouring authorities about the
distribution of housing across the housing market area (HMA) and
appropriate member endorsement sought. The settlement
hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy (Sept 2008) will be reviewed
and appropriate consideration given to provision for growth in all
settlements. Approaches to development of all types of dwellings
including re-use of existing buildings in rural locations and new
dwellings will be considered.
The programme for preparation of the Local Plan
appears lengthy. Appropriate resources should be
made available to ensure an up to date policy
framework, especially given increasing scrutiny of
land supply.
It is important that enough affordable homes are
made available to rent and to buy.
ACCEPTED: At time of publication of the Local Development
Scheme (LDS) a cautious approach was taken regarding the
completion of the regulatory stages of plan-making. The Council
will review this document annually and where possible will ensure
that production of the new plan is expedited as swiftly as possible.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district.
Maintain historic buildings and sites.
ACCEPTED: The Council acknowledges the NPPF requirements with
regard to the historic environment. We will consider the need for a
specific policy on the Historic Environment when developing policy
options.
Employment must support new houses. Employment
seems to be focused around Fakenham and North
Walsham but more is needed in places like Holt.
ACCEPTED: A ‘Business Growth and Investment Opportunities
Study’ has been commissioned by NNDC and is currently at draft
stage. The document considers the needs of existing businesses
within the district, establishes land availability for expansion of
existing businesses and seeks to ascertain opportunities for growth
and investment.
Good public transport links are required.
ACCEPTED: The adequacy of the highway network to support
10
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
21
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
LPS 27
Sport England
N/a
Objection
LPS 28
Brown and Co
N/a
Comments
Summary of representation
The emerging Local plan should cover the protection
of and provision of indoor and outdoor facilities for
sport and recreation, including playing fields,
artificial pitches, green courts, sports halls,
swimming pools and indoor/outdoor bowls. Sports
provision plays an important role in the local area,
be that for local residents or for visitors to the area.
The survival of many settlements is dependent upon
an appropriate scale of growth. The current policies
are too restrictive and have prevented a range of
sites coming forward. All settlements have a role to
play in bringing forward growth in an appropriate
manner.
Council response
future levels of growth will be considered alongside policy
development and consideration of sites for development.
ACCEPTED: The ‘North Norfolk District Indoor Leisure Facilities
Strategy’ has been commissioned by NNDC regarding the provision
of indoor facilities within the district which will be used to inform
the development of policy.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements
The new Local Plan needs to address any shortfall in
housing delivery and should be aware of the needs
of the wider area through preparation of a SHMA.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. Following publication,
discussions will be had with neighbouring authorities about the
distribution of housing across the housing market area (HMA) and
appropriate member endorsement sought.
Coastal Erosion policies need reviewing. Measures
need to be put in place to clearly identify how this
issue is to be addressed.
ACCEPTED: The Council is likely to publish a Strategic Flood Risk
Assessment to provide evidence on flood risk throughout the
district. This evidence document, alongside other strategies such
as the Coastline Management Plan would help inform any future
policies on climate change and flood risk and coastal erosion.
Appropriate uses must be attracted to key selected
settlements to ensure their economic vitality and
viability.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. The need for a Retail
Study will be considered.
A clear review mechanism needs to be put in place
to ensure any future plan is achieving its set aims
ACCEPTED: The Council will consider appropriate monitoring
indicators alongside development of policies.
11
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
22
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
LPS 29
Wells-Next-The-Sea
Town Council
N/a
Comment
LPS 30
T Musker
N/a
Comments
LPS31
Neatishead Parish
Council
N/a
Comment
Summary of representation
Council response
and objectives.
There must be a balance struck between increased
tourism and the needs of the resident population.
Building new homes only for them to become
second homes, holiday homes or B&Bs is of no
benefit.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. The need for a Tourism
Study will be considered. The use of dwellings as second homes
and holiday homes does not fall under planning control.
Any additional allocation of dwellings beyond those
in the 2021 plan will be difficult to sustain without
significant improvements in infrastructure and
facilities.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. It is likely that a Strategic
Infrastructure Assessment will be prepared under the Duty to
Cooperate and a Local Infrastructure Assessment will be required.
There should be a degree of flexibility in all policies
and the views of the community should be fully
considered.
ACCEPTED: The NPPF requires that policies are made flexible so
that they can respond to changing market conditions. The Council
recently consulted on a draft Statement of Community
Involvement (SCI) which sets out how we intend to consult with all
stakeholders during plan-making and on planning applications.
ACCEPTED: The adequacy of the highway network to support
future levels of growth will be considered alongside policy
development and consideration of sites for development.
Measures should be taken to ensure adequate and
sufficient footpaths and footway systems are in
place for communities. Measures should be taken to
ensure that traffic and roadways are improved and
amended so that they do not have a detrimental
impact on communities. Measures should be taken
to reinstate plans for the Cromer Bypass.
Provision of affordable housing in rural areas is an
area of challenge which needs addressing.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements.
Transparency and consistency in decision making
should support implementation.
ACCEPTED: The Council will publish a consultation statement at
each regulatory stage of consultation in plan-making so that the
representations received and the Council’s response can be clearly
understood.
Transport should be included in the strategic areas
to be considered.
ACCEPTED: The adequacy of the highway network to support
future levels of growth will be considered alongside policy
development and consideration of sites for development.
12
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
23
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
LPS 32
Pigeon Land Ltd
(Represented by
Bidwells)
N/a
Comment
There is a need to identify a sufficient number of
sustainable sites for residential development in
appropriate locations, in order to meet objectively
assessed need for both market and affordable
housing.
LPS 33
Persimmon Homes
N/a
Comment
The amount of housing growth should be identified
through a SHMA and distribution of growth should
be considered in a sustainable fashion, albeit
accepting that some smaller settlements need
proportionate growth to sustain services. The
provision of infrastructure and affordable housing
needs should be considered against the
viability/deliverability of housing.
The announcement by Government about 200,000
starter homes will add further pressure to identify
suitable housing land in the district.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. Following publication,
discussions will be had with neighbouring authorities about the
distribution of housing across the housing market area (HMA) and
appropriate member endorsement sought. The settlement
hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy (Sept 2008) will be reviewed
and appropriate consideration given to provision for growth in all
settlements.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. Following publication,
discussions will be had with neighbouring authorities about the
distribution of housing across the housing market area (HMA) and
appropriate member endorsement sought. The settlement
hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy (Sept 2008) will be reviewed
and appropriate consideration given to provision for growth in all
settlements
LPS 34
Anglian Water
N/a
Comment
An infrastructure capacity and environmental study
should support the review of the local plan to ensure
opportunities and constraints are identified at the
outset. This should establish the potential
sustainability of a settlement.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. It is likely that a Strategic
Infrastructure Assessment will be prepared under the Duty to
Cooperate and a Local Infrastructure Assessment will be required.
In addition, all policy options and sites will be considered against
sustainability criteria, including consideration of environmental
constraints.
Given the lengthy process before projected adoption
there should be no delays to ensure there is an upto-date policy framework, and subsequent scrutiny
of the Councils land supply position.
ACCEPTED: At time of publication of the Local Development
Scheme (LDS) a cautious approach was taken regarding the
completion of the regulatory stages of plan-making. The Council
will review this document annually and where possible will ensure
that production of the new plan is expedited as swiftly as possible.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
The Council may wish to consider commissioning a
13
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
24
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
Water Cycle Study
to support production of the Local Plan. The need for a Water
Cycle Study will be considered.
ACCEPTED: We will be reviewing our transport policies and
considering how we can best achieve sustainable transport. In
addition we will also be reviewing developer contributions from
development and when/how we can secure travel plans to
promote more sustainable methods of transport.
NOTED
LPS 35
Community Action
Norfolk (CAN)
N/a
Comment
Travel planning should be included alongside an
ambition to use opportunities to design in better
health, social and safety outcomes. Community
cohesion is part of sustainable development.
LPS 36
National Grid
(Represented by Amec
Foster Wheeler)
Anglia Maltings
(Holding) Ltd
N/a
Comment
No comments to make at this stage.
N/a
Comment
North Norfolk has too narrow an economic base and
the range of businesses, their scale and their
capacity to generate high quality employment
identified in the current plan will not deliver the jobs
target (4,000 jobs by 2021). The creative economy
(manufacturing, design and marketing) should be
explored and the needs of existing businesses to
expand and deliver added value should be explored.
The local plan should encourage inward investment
and encourage existing businesses to expand and
develop.
ACCEPTED: A ‘Business Growth and Investment Opportunities
Study’ has been commissioned by NNDC and is currently at draft
stage. The document considers the needs of existing businesses
within the district, establishes land availability for expansion of
existing businesses and seeks to ascertain opportunities for growth
and investment. Once published this evidence document will be
used to guide policy development.
Greater economic activity needs supporting in
villages and settlements outside the identified
principle settlements and there are omissions from
the current service villages (Foulsham and Great
Ryburgh in particular) which should be included
given the strong employment base they provide and
local services offered.
ACCEPTED: The current local plan allows for employment
development outside of principle settlements. The settlement
hierarchy will be re-visited in development of new policies and
appropriate consideration given to provision for growth in all
settlements.
Opportunities exist for the expansion of wind power
generation and there are greater opportunities for
solar arrays. Substantial amounts of bi-product arise
from existing food manufacturing which could be
converted to renewable energy (e.g. anaerobic
digestion). Combined heat and power (CHP) should
ACCEPTED: Consideration will be given to how we can promote
renewable technologies in policy development.
LPS 37
14
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
25
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
be considered.
LPS 38
Thorpe Market Parish
Council
N/a
Comment
Existing settlements with local facilities should plan
for limited additional housing growth, possibly in the
form of mixed use development to support those
existing services.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements.
Solutions need to be found to ensure young people
stay in the district.
ACCEPTED: The Council will explore the options available within
the scope of plan-making.
Great Ryburgh should be a service village.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements.
Economic focus of the local plan should be measured
by achievement of the following:
1. Diversification of jobs
2. Number of companies headquartered in
North Norfolk
3. Number of jobs based on intellectual
property development
4. Measuring value added to agricultural
production including export value.
Thorpe Market Parish Council would not be opposed
to limited development provide that appropriate
amenities were also included. A small scale scheme
would save the village from further morbidity. The
existing restriction on housing could be replaced
with a case-by-case review of planning applications,
particularly for a small exception scheme for new
affordable homes.
The B1159 cost road is at risk if the coastline
between Overstrand and Mundesley is not to be
protected. This is of vital importance to the tourist
economy.
ACCEPTED: The Council will consider appropriate monitoring
indicators alongside development of policies.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. The need for a Strategic
Flood Risk Assessment will be considered. If produced, this
evidence, alongside other strategies such as the Coastline
Management Plan would help inform any future policies on
15
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
26
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
The local plan should consider provision of
broadband and mobile phone networks.
climate change, flood risk and coastal erosion and potential rollback sites.
ACCEPTED: The Council acknowledges the NPPF requirement to
include a telecommunications policy in the Local Plan.
The local plan should devote some attention to
facilities and the welfare of the elderly.
LPS 39
Amstel Group
Corporation
(Represented by Indigo
Planning)
LPS 40
Blue Sky leisure
(Represented by
Bidwells)
LPS 41
B Grieves
N/a
Comment
Comment
N/a
Comment
The scope and subject matter of the new Local Plan
appears to be appropriate.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. This document includes evidence
of the needs of the elderly. Any future policies will seek to address
this need.
NOTED
We welcome investigations into better
understanding the districts objectively assessed
need (OAN) for market and affordable housing.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. Following publication,
discussions will be had with neighbouring authorities about the
distribution of housing across the housing market area (HMA) and
appropriate member endorsement sought.
We would also welcome a review of the district
overall spatial strategy.
Coastal erosion has not been included. This is a key
issue which needs to be addressed. The rate of
coastal erosion, and its impact on land uses,
including tourism, means it will become ever more
important over time. The Council must consider its
approach to ‘roll-back’. It may be appropriate for the
Council to identify alternative sites and locations for
residential, commercial and tourism uses which will
require relocation as a direct result of coastal
erosion and coastal flooding. A ‘roll-back’ policy
should be put in place.
Aldborough no longer has the facilities to be a
ACCEPTED: The new Local Plan will include a revised spatial
strategy for the district.
ACCEPTED: Reference to review of current coastal erosion policies
is made in the Reg 18 document. The Council will consider the
options for any future policy on roll-back or relocation of existing
uses as a result of coastal flooding and erosion. Any new policy will
be subject to sustainability appraisal.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
16
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
27
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
LPS 42
Respondent
Taylor Wimpey
Strategic Land
(Represented by Carter
Jonas)
Policy/
paragraph
2.1
Nature of
rep
Comment
Summary of representation
Council response
service village.
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements.
Greater emphasis should be placed on safety of
pedestrians when proposing future development.
ACCEPTED: During consideration of sites the proximity of local
services and access to those services will be considered. The
Sustainability criteria are currently being worked up, against which
all proposed development sites will be assessed.
When proposing new development consideration
should be given to the hamlets as well as the
villages. Spreading development will achieve the
same ends with a lower impact.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements
Conservation areas should be sacrosanct.
ACCEPTED: The types of development considered acceptable in
conservation areas will be considered during policy development.
Corporate stakeholders who indicate their facilities
can cope with new development should be required
to publish the basis on which they make their
statements and give existing occupiers the chance to
reciprocate.
From the outset of consultation on the last local plan
there seemed to be a determination to locate as
much development on sites NOT favoured by local
opinion. Planners must consider parish council’s
views.
NNDC should not be carrying forward any form of
restraint in terms of development. The NPPF
establishes a presumption in favour of sustainable
development and NNDC should therefore challenge
itself to fully meet objectively assessed need (OAN)
once defined.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. The need for a Strategic
Infrastructure Assessment and/or Local Infrastructure Assessment
will be considered.
ACCEPTED: The Council recently consulted on a draft Statement of
Community Involvement (SCI) which sets out how we intend to
consult with all stakeholders during plan-making and on planning
applications. We are committed to engaging fully with our
communities and will consider all representations made.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication. Following publication,
discussions will be had with neighbouring authorities about the
distribution of housing across the housing market area (HMA) and
appropriate member endorsement sought. The settlement
hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy (Sept 2008) will be reviewed
and appropriate consideration given to provision for growth in all
settlements.
17
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
28
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
LPS 43
Fakenham Town
Council
N/a
Comment
LPS 44
CPRE Norfolk
N/a
Comment
Summary of representation
Council response
An appraisal of North Norfolk should be carried out
to assess the unique qualities and aspects of the
area.
ACCEPTED: Work is underway to prepare a Sustainability Appraisal
Scoping Report on which we will engage local communities and
other stakeholders as necessary. This will inform the sustainability
criteria against which all policy and site options will be assessed.
Reference should be made to preparation of a
SHMA.
NOT ACCEPTED: The Regulation 18 document is not considered the
right place to make reference to evidence documents. A Strategic
Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is currently being prepared to
establish objectively assessed need (OAN) for market and
affordable housing across the district. This document is nearing
publication.
There should be consultation with the LEP during
preparation of any evidence on employment and
economic development.
ACCEPTED: Any evidence produced on employment and economic
development will be prepared in consultation with the LEP.
Under the Duty to Cooperate, NNDC should work
closely with County Highways to ensure there is a
cohesive development strategy.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. The need for a Strategic
Infrastructure Assessment and/or Local Infrastructure Assessment
will be considered.
An update on progress of CIL adoption would be
welcomed.
ACCEPTED: There are currently no plans to adopt a CIL charging
schedule.
The LDS should set out the documents proposed to
be prepared as evidence, including a timetable for
their commissioning and publication.
A map was provided with potential development
sites identified.
ACCEPTED: A timetable for evidence preparation will be included
in the next publication of the Local Development Scheme (LDS).
There must be a determined effort to protect and
conserve the natural environment and wider
countryside. We owe this to future generations and
our natural environment is key to our local economy.
Existing Core Strategies have stood up well. EN8 and
NOTED: The Council is preparing to publish a ‘call for sites’ towards
the end of 2015. At that time, Fakenham Town Council will be
invited to submit these sites for consideration.
NOTED
NOTED
18
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
29
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
EN9. We would like to see water resource added.
LPS 45
Thursford Parish
Council
N/a
Comment
There should be a clear and quantifiable assessment
of housing needs, including affordable housing. The
SHMA may arrive at an overly high number which
will be justified as the basis for achieving affordable
housing targets. 45% affordable housing target is
unrealistic. AONB boundaries are being impacted by
housing allocations which will become a more acute
issue in this coming review. Provision of
occupational buildings in the countryside should be
reserved only for those who require this for their
occupation.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district. This
document is nearing publication.
Demands on infrastructure need serious
consideration.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. It is likely that a Strategic
Infrastructure Assessment will be prepared under the Duty to
Cooperate and a Local Infrastructure Assessment will be required.
Higher skilled jobs would be welcomed. Changes in
shopping patterns and continuing trends for internet
shopping will impact on market towns and our High
Streets.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. The need for a Retail
Study will be considered. Any new policy on uses within town
centres will be flexible and will reflect current permitted
development rights for change of use.
There will be major impacts as a result of transport
works in the wider district (e.g. dualling of A11 and
A47, and NDR) – numbers of day visitors will
increase and further pressures from London for
second homes. Impact of this on our road networks
and natural environment needs consideration.
We wish to raise concern about the need for
affordable homes for local people in parishes where
more than half the houses are holiday or second
homes.
ACCEPTED: The adequacy of the highway network will be
considered alongside policy development and consideration of
sites for development. The impact of wider strategic changes to
the transport network will also be considered.
ACCEPTED: The settlement hierarchy in the existing Core Strategy
(Sept 2008) will be reviewed and appropriate consideration given
to provision for growth in all settlements. The use of dwellings as
second homes and holiday homes does not fall under planning
control.
19
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
30
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
LPS 46
Barbara Powell
N/a
Comment
Many challenges facing the district including;
 Meeting housing need
 Preserving the countryside
 Balancing the needs of the countryside
against industry, tourism and infrastructure.
 Need to retain young people in the district
 Finding space for outdoor leisure activities
NOTED.
Before releasing new land, existing small sites should
be considered so as to preserve agricultural land.
ACCEPTED: There is a clear Government drive to reuse brownfield
land. The Council is preparing to publish a ‘call for sites’ towards
the end of 2015. At that time sites can be put forward for
consideration of their development potential.
A good mix of housing is needed with easy access to
facilities etc. Insulation and energy solutions should
be integral.
ACCEPTED: A Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) is
currently being prepared to establish objectively assessed need
(OAN) for market and affordable housing across the district.
Energy requirements for new dwellings have recently been made
part of Building Regulations so all new development will have to
meet certain criteria.
Any development needs to protect our AONB,
historic sites and wildlife.
ACCEPTED: All proposed development sites and all policies will be
assessed against sustainability criteria to ensure that development
is directed to the most appropriate locations. The Sustainability
Appraisal (SA) will include criteria to assess economic, social and
environmental factors, and is likely to look at location within, or
adjacent to, the AONB.
Tourism is needed but we must avoid winter ‘ghost
towns’.
ACCEPTED: The Council is currently scoping the evidence required
to support production of the Local Plan. The need for a Tourism
Study will be considered.
Solutions need to be found to ensure young people
stay in the district.
ACCEPTED: The Council will explore the options available within
the scope of plan-making.
Adequate parking must be integral to all new
ACCEPTED: We will be reviewing our transport policies and
considering how we can best promote sustainable transport
20
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
31
9 November 2015
Appendix 1 - Regulation 18 Consultation Responses (October 2015)
Rep
Ref
Respondent
Policy/
paragraph
Nature of
rep
Summary of representation
Council response
development. Public transport must be addressed to
encourage a move away from our current car
culture. Cycle paths to link our open and green
recreational areas are essential.
modes.
There should be on-going monitoring and there
should be close scrutiny.
ACCEPTED: The Council will consider appropriate monitoring
indicators alongside development of policies.
21
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
32
9 November 2015
Agenda Item No_____9_______
Draft Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) Consultation Responses
Summary:
This report provides a summary of the responses received to
the public consultation on the draft Statement of Community
Involvement (SCI) and suggests updates to the document
where appropriate.
Conclusions:
The Draft SCI provides a clear and accessible guide on how
the local planning authority will endeavour to encourage
widespread involvement in the preparation of planning policy
documents and in the determination of planning Applications.
Recommendations:
That the amendments outlined in Appendix 4 are
incorporated into the SCI and that it is recommended to
Cabinet for approval.
Cabinet Member(s)
All Members
Ward(s) affected
All Wards
Martha Moore, Planning Policy Officer
Tel: 01263 516084
Email: Martha.moore@north-norfolk.gov.uk
1.
Introduction
1.1
This report provides a summary of responses made to the SCI consultation, which
sought views from statutory consultees, communities and other interested parties on
how they should be involved during the plan-making stage and when planning
applications are made.
1.2
The revised SCI is included as Appendix 2 to this report.
2.
The Statement of Community Involvement
2.1
Section 18 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 (as amended) requires
Local Planning Authorities (LPAs) to produce a Statement of Community Involvement
(SCI) to explain how they will engage local communities and other interested parties
when preparing their Local Plan, other policy documents, and when determining
planning applications.
2.2
The Council’s current SCI was adopted in 2006. Due to legislative changes brought
about in the main by the Localism Act 2011, the National Planning Policy Framework
2012 and the Local Plan Regulations 2012, the SCI produced in 2006 needs to be
updated. This review also provides an opportunity to update our approaches to
community involvement and recognises that the opportunities for community
involvement have evolved since 2006 and that new methods of engagement (such as
social media forums and web based consultations) can be used to help reach a wider
audience.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
33
9 November 2015
2.3
The aim of the SCI is to provide a clear and accessible guide on how the local planning
authority will endeavour to encourage widespread involvement in the planning process.
It provides details on the minimum statutory requirements for consultation at both the
plan-making stage and the planning application stage and gives details on the different
consultation methods that the LPA may use. Other than where there is a statutory
requirement, the SCI is deliberate in not committing the LPA to specific methods of
consultation; this will enable consultation methods to be tailored to specific situations
and will enable the methods used to reflect best practice and to reach specific groups.
3.
Consultation on the draft Statement of Community Involvement
3.1
Although not a regulatory requirement, the Statement of Community Involvement has
been subject to public consultation for a period of eight weeks from the 17th August
2015. In this time, statutory consultees, communities and other interested parties and
interested bodies could make comments on the document (approximately 1,536
stakeholders were consulted).
3.2
In total 7 comments were made on the SCI draft. Most comments were generally
supportive of the draft SCI. A summary of the comments received can be found in
Appendix 3.
3.3
In addition, a number of changes are proposed to the document following consultation.
A summary of these can be found in Appendix 4.
4.
Recommendations
4.1
To recommend to Cabinet that the amendments outlined in Appendix 4 are
incorporated into the SCI and that it is recommended to Cabinet for approval.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
34
9 November 2015
APPENDIX 2
North Norfolk
2016 - 2036
STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
November 2015
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
35
9 November 2015
North Norfolk District Council
Planning Policy Team
Telephone: 01263 516318
E-Mail: planningpolicy@north-norfolk.gov.uk
Write to: Planning Policy Manager,
North Norfolk District Council,
Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN
www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/localplan
All documents can be made available in
Braille, audio, large print or in other languages.
Please contact 01263 516318 to discuss your requirements.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
36
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
Contents
1
Introduction
What is the Statement of Community Involvement (SCI)?
Why are we producing a new Statement of Community Involvement?
What are the main objectives of the Statement of Community Involvement?
3
3
3
4
2
The Council's role as Local Planning Authority
The Local Plan explained
Planning Policy Team
Development Management & Major Projects Teams
The role of Councillors in the planning system
5
5
7
7
8
3
How to get involved
Plan Making
How we will get members of the public involved in Plan-making
Neighbourhood Planning
Planning Applications
9
9
12
13
15
Appendices
1
Consultation Bodies
Specific Consultation Bodies
General Consultation Bodies
18
18
19
2
Duty to Cooperate Stakeholders
Duty to Cooperate Stakeholders
21
21
3
Material Planning Considerations
What are material planning considerations?
23
23
4
Further Advice
Contact details and further resources
25
25
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
37
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
Contents
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
38
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
Introduction 1
1 Introduction
What is the Statement of Community Involvement (SCI)?
The Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) lets you know how you can get involved in
planning. The planning process enables involvement at both the plan-making stage and when
decisions on planning applications are being made.
1.1
The purpose of this document is to ensure that communities and other interested parties
understand how they can participate in the planning process.
1.2
The planning system manages the use and development of land and buildings and as the
Local Planning Authority, North Norfolk District Council (NNDC) is responsible for ensuring
that the right development takes place in the right areas of the district. As planning helps to
shape the places where people live and work, it is important that communities and other
interested parties have the chance to get involved, especially when there are difficult planning
decisions to be made. We want to give everyone the opportunity to get involved from an early
stage in the process and we want to make engagement as easy and as meaningful as possible.
1.3
The opportunity to get involved in the planning process arises at two main points:
Plan-making - sets out the vision for growth in North Norfolk and acts as a guide for
future development.
Planning application decisions - the process for considering development proposals
for individual sites or buildings.
1.4
NNDC places great importance on effective community involvement and this SCI gives details
on the different ways NNDC may do this, at both the plan-making stage and at the planning
application stage.
Why are we producing a new Statement of Community Involvement?
This SCI takes account of legislative changes brought about by:
The Localism Act (2011)
The National Planning Policy Framework (2012)
1.5
NNDC aims to put the interests of local communities at the heart of everything it does and
believes in local decisions and local actions for the benefit of local communities. The Council’s
Corporate Plan outlines our shared vision, values and priority areas on which we intend to
concentrate our efforts: jobs and the local economy, housing and infrastructure, coast and
countryside, health and well-being and delivery and service excellence. Communities and
businesses have an important part to play in helping to deliver this vision by getting involved
in the planning process at both the local plan-making stage and at the planning application
stage.
1.6
The opportunity to get involved will be open to all who want to be involved, regardless of age,
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
39
9 November 2015
3
4
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
1 Introduction
disability, gender, race, religion or belief, sexual orientation, social deprivation or social
background. We will also endeavour to ensure that consultations reach those ‘hard-to-engage’
groups.
1.7
The SCI is one of the documents that current planning legislation (Section 18, Planning and
(1)
Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 as amended) requires Local Planning Authorities to produce.
There have been a lot of changes in planning legislation since adoption of our first SCI in 2006
and this review is therefore vital to ensure that we are doing all we can reasonably do to
encourage involvement in the planning process. The revised SCI takes account of recent
legislative changes, introduced in the main by the Localism Act (2011) and the National
Planning Policy Framework (2012).
1.8
As a minimum, planning consultations will comply with legislative requirements.
What are the main objectives of the Statement of Community Involvement?
1.9
The SCI will aim to meet a number of objectives to ensure that involvement in the planning
process is as easy and as meaningful as possible.
1.10
It is the intention of North Norfolk District Council that the SCI will:
Improve involvement
To make sure everyone knows why we are asking for involvement and when and how
they can get involved.
Enable joint working
To try and link with existing groups and partnerships.
To be flexible
To make sure the ways we involve people are working, and to change them where
necessary.
To inform
To make our information clear so people can make informed choices when replying to
our consultations.
To make it easy for you to get involved
To make sure any public exercises are appropriate and accessible, whilst also making
sure they are cost effective.
To let you know what decisions have been made and why
It is not always possible to make planning decisions that everyone agrees with and
sometimes difficult decisions have to be made. The plan-making process includes the
production of a Consultation Statement, which outlines how the main issues raised by
members of the public and other interested have been addressed. We are happy to
discuss decisions on individual planning applications with interested parties.
1
40
9 November 2015
Section 18, Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/5/section/18
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
The Council's role as Local Planning Authority 2
2 The Council's role as Local Planning Authority
The Local Plan explained
The Council is developing a new Local Plan to replace the current 'Local Development Framework'.
The new Local Plan will be used to help assess planning and listed building applications.
2.1
Over the next few years, NNDC will be developing a Local Plan to replace the current Local
Development Framework (LDF). The current system of local plans was largely put into place
by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004, reforms set out in the Localism Act 2011
and the National Planning Policy Framework 2012. Two changes of particular significance are
The Duty to Cooperate and Neighbourhood Planning, introduced through the 2011 Localism
Act.
2.2
The Localism Act recognises that there are some wider strategic planning issues (such as
housing, jobs, transport and water) where 'Duty to Cooperate Stakeholders' bodies (Appendix
2) may be able to work together to help deliver joined-up development. NNDC is part of the
Norfolk Duty to Cooperate Member Forum, which has made a commitment to consider the
need for joint or coordinated working on particular topics or evidence.
2.3
'Neighbourhood Planning' is a Government initiative to empower communities to take a more
proactive role in planning for their local area. It allows local areas to come together to establish
general planning policies for development and the use of land in their neighbourhood, which
then becomes part of the Local Plan (pages 13-14).
2.4
The Local Plan that NNDC produces will set out the priorities and policies for delivering
sustainable development in the district until 2036. It will consider aspects such as housing,
the economy, community facilities and infrastructure, as well as how we will safeguard the
environment, adapt to climate change and secure good design.
2.5
Whilst the priorities and policies in the Local Plan will be specific to North Norfolk, they will
also need to be consistent with overriding planning policies produced by the Government, on
aspects such as achieving sustainable development, meeting the challenge of climate change,
flooding and coastal change and requiring good design.
2.6
Once the Local Plan has been adopted, it will be used to help Planning Officers consider
individual planning applications. Figure 1, on the following page, shows the relationship of the
Local Plan to other planning documents.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
41
9 November 2015
5
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
Sustainability
Appraisal
Assessment of
relevant
environmental,
economic and social
impacts of the Local
Plan.
42
Evidence base
Background studies
on issues such as
housing need.
Planning Applications
Planning applications will be considered against
the policies contained with the Local Plan, any
adopted Neighbourhood Plans and the NPPF
and using guidance contained in any SPDs,
unless there are sufficient material
considerations to indicate otherwise.
Statement of
Community
Involvement
Provides details on who,
how and when we will
consult at the planmaking and Planning
Applications stages.
NNDC Local Plan
Sets out how the NPPF will be applied
to North Norfolk. This will include
information on what sort of
development will be allowed where in
the District. Includes Policy Maps,
which indicate which particular
policies/allocations and constraints
apply where and site allocations
Community-led
Planning
(also known as a
Parish Plan) is a
community project
to improve local
services and
facilities.
Annual Monitoring Report
Produced to assess the extent
to which policy objectives are
being achieved.
Neighbourhood Planning
Allows local areas to come
together to establish
general planning policies for
development and use of
land in their
neighbourhood.
Local Development Orders (LDOs) & Article 4 Directions
An LDO grants to permit specific development to proceed
in a specific area without requiring planning permission.
An Article 4 direction allows the withdrawal of specific
Permitted Development Rights in a specific area.
Figure 1 The relationship of the Local Plan to other documents
Habitats Regulation
Assessment
Required if it is
considered likely that
the Local Plan would
have significant
effects on European
habitats or species.
Supplementary Planning Documents (SPD)
Provides further details on how Local Plan
policies should be applied. May include a
design guide, a landscape character
assessment, a development brief, a
masterplan or design codes.
National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF)
Sets out the Government’s planning policies for
England. It provides the basis for Local Planning
Authorities when preparing their Local Plans and
for communities preparing Neighbourhood Plans.
The National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG)
supports the NPPF.
6
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
2 The Council's role as Local Planning Authority
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
The Council's role as Local Planning Authority 2
Planning Policy Team
This team produces the Local Plan and will be asking you for your comments at various stages
of the process. During preparation of the plan we will send out newsletters to keep you updated.
If you would like to receive these updates, please email us: planningpolicy@north-norfolk.gov.uk
2.7
The Planning Policy team is responsible for producing a Local Plan in order to guide
development and promote growth in the District and for providing guidance on policy
interpretation.
2.8
The team is currently starting the process of producing a new Local Plan. As part of this
process, we will update the evidence base where necessary to inform any future planning
policies and documents. Throughout the process, we will consult with relevant consultees, the
general public and other organisations and consider any representations made. The resulting
draft Local Plan will be examined by an independent Planning Inspector in order to determine
(2)
whether it is ‘sound’ and can be adopted.
Development Management & Major Projects Teams
These teams assess and determine all planning applications. For the majority of applications,
you will have the opportunity to let us know what you think of a particular proposal.
(3)
2.9
The Development Management team and Major Projects team are responsible for assessing
and determining the majority of applications under the authority delegated to the Head of
Planning, providing informal advice on development proposals, preparing Development Briefs
for land allocated for development and making recommendations to Development Committee
on certain applications. As part of the process, the teams consult relevant statutory consultees
and members of the public.
2.10
The Council also has a Conservation, Design and Landscape Team, who provide advice on
listed buildings, conservation areas, design, trees (including Tree Preservation Orders (TPO’s)
and protected species. Applications are determined in accordance with adopted policies in
(4)
the Local Plan and Neighbourhood Plans, unless Material Planning Considerations indicate
otherwise.
2
3
4
As defined in Para. 182 National Planning Policy Framework https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-planning-policy-framework--2
Major development is defined in Part 1 of The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure (England) Order
2015) - http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/595/part/1/made. The Major Projects team’s workload may vary from this list.
'Material considerations' are defined in Appendix 3 of this document.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
43
9 November 2015
7
8
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
2 The Council's role as Local Planning Authority
The role of Councillors in the planning system
Elected Councillors have an important role to play in the planning process, by acting as community
representatives and decision makers. Details of which Councillor is representing each local area
(5)
can be found on the NNDC website .
2.11
5
Every village and town within the District has at least one elected Councillor representing
them. Elected Councillors have an important role to play in the planning process, by acting as
community representatives and decision-makers. Crucially, Councillors can act as a link
between communities and Planning Officers. It is important to remember however, that views
should also be shared directly with the Planning Department so we can register you as an
interested party and let you know what future opportunities there may be for you to get involved.
44
See 'Find My Local Councillor' http://www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/council/3657.asp
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
How to get involved 3
3 How to get involved
Plan Making
The new Local Plan will set out the vision on how the North Norfolk district will develop until
2036. Throughout the process of developing the plan, interested parties will have the opportunity
to have their say and influence the emerging plan.
3.1
Once adopted, Planning Officers will use the policies contained in the new Local Plan along
with guidance in supporting documents (know as Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs))
to make recommendations on whether planning applications should be approved or refused.
3.2
The adopted Plan will be the result of consultation with a wide range of stakeholders including
elected Members, statutory consultees, the general public and other interested groups. The
extent to which you get involved is up to you; you may wish to attend public events that we
arrange or you may just wish to email us giving your opinion on a particular issue. The Local
Plan will set out how the vision for North Norfolk will develop until 2036, so it is important that
you share your views with us. Details on different methods we will use to consult you are
outlined in Figure 4 on page 12 Figure 6 'The Planning Application Process'.
3.3
Town and Parish Councils are key partners in the process. They will be formally consulted at
certain stages and are responsible for representing your community. With the introduction of
Neighbourhood Planning, the role of Town and Parish Councils has become even more
important.
3.4
It is not only members of the public and Town and Parish Councils who will be asked to get
involved in the plan-making process. 'Specific Consultation Bodies' such as Historic England
and Natural England will be consulted at various stages, as will 'General Consultation Bodies'
such as voluntary or community groups representing groups in the local area. These groups
can be vital in helping to gather the views of those people who may be difficult to reach using
typical consultation methods.
3.5
We will always consider your views when moving to the next stage of developing the Local
Plan. It should be recognised, however, that difficult planning decisions will have to be made
and we will be unable to produce a plan that fully meets everybody’s expectations. Ultimately,
NNDC as the Local Planning Authority will need to make key planning decisions and will need
to be accountable for those decisions.
3.6
The processes that will be followed when producing a new local plan, any resulting SPDs and
for any neighbourhood plans are outlined in the tables on pages 10, 11 and 14. From time to
time, Government legislation and regulations on what LPAs are required to do as part of these
processes changes. If this happens, the process tables in this document will be updated and
an amended document published.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
45
9 November 2015
9
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
3 How to get involved
3.7
The process that the Planning Policy team will follow when producing the new Local Plan,
Supplementary Planning Documents, or when supporting the development of Neighbourhood
Plans, is outlined in the following tables:
Local Plan Making Process stage
What is involved?
Development of evidence base
•
•
•
Carrying out of background research to inform Local Plan;
Engagement with Duty to Cooperate partners;
Identification of relevant environmental, economic and social
objectives to inform the Sustainability Appraisal.
Stage 2
•
•
Consideration of points raised in Stage 1;
Invitation to stakeholder and members of the public to
comment on what a Local Plan of that particular subject ought
to contain. Minimum of 6 weeks.
Testing of emerging options through Sustainability Appraisal.
Stage 1
Public participation in deciding
content of the Local Plan
(Regulation 18 of Local Plan Regulations 2012)
•
Sustainability Appraisal and Habitats Regulations Assessment
10
Stage 3
Preparation of the draft Local Plan
•
•
•
Stage 4
Publication of draft Local Plan
•
The draft Local Plan is made available for stakeholders and
members of the public to comment. Minimum of 6 weeks
consultation (may involve more than one consultation period).
•
Formal consideration of points raised in Stage 4.
•
Local Plan submitted for examination to the Secretary of State.
•
An independent planning inspector is appointed by the
Secretary of State to examine the Local Plan. The examination
could follow a number of different forms depending on the
issue or evidence being considered. The examination may
include a formal hearing.
•
If the Inspector finds the Local Plan sound, then NNDC can
adopt the plan and produce an Adoption Statement.
(Regulation 19 of Local Plan Regulations 2012)
Stage 5
Formal consideration of representations
Consideration of points raised in Stage 2;
Formation of draft policies and supporting documents (to
include the Sustainability Appraisal and Habitat Regulations
Assessment if necessary);
The Council may undertake consultation with stakeholders
and members of the public on different issues and options.
Stage 6
Submission of draft Local Plan
(Regulation 22 of Local Plan Regulations 2012)
Stage 7
Examination of the submitted plan
(Regulations 23 and 24 of Local Plan Regulations 2012)
Stage 8
Adoption
(Regulations 25 and 26 of Local Plan Regulations 2012 and
Section 23 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act
2004)
Figure 2 The Local Plan making process
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
46
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
How to get involved 3
SPD Process stage
Stage 1
Development of evidence base
What is involved?
• Collection of the information needed and identification of
issues needed for the preparation of the SPD;
• Engagement with relevant stakeholders to decide on the
contents and level of details to be contained in the SPD.
Where necessary, this may involve preliminary consultations
prior to the publication of a draft SPD.
Stage 2
Drafting of the SPD
(Regulation 12 of Local Plan Regulations 2012)
• Drafting of SPD;
• Consultation with stakeholders and members of the public.
Minimum of 4 weeks consultation.
Stage 3
Preparation of the SPD
• Formal consideration of points raised in Stage 2.
Stage 4
Adoption of SPD by full Council
(Regulation 14 of Local Plan Regulations 2012)
• If full Council adopt the plan, then NNDC can adopt the SPD
and produce an Adoption Statement.
Figure 3 The Supplementary Planning Document process
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
47
9 November 2015
11
12
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
3 How to get involved
How we will get members of the public involved in Plan-making
3.8
As Figure 4 below indicates, we will use a range of consultation methods to try and ensure
that we engage a wide audience as part of any plan-making process. The consultation method
chosen will depend on the type of document being consulted upon at the time. NNDC will
continue to develop its understanding of which consultation methods work best and the most
effective way of reaching those groups considered to be hard-to-engage (such as people
whose first language is not English, young people and gypsies, travellers and travelling show
people). Consultation events will take place in easily accessible public places at appropriate
times.
The Planning Policy section on the NNDC website is kept up to date with the latest news. You will be able to respond to consultations through the website.
We may use posters
to alert you to consultation events, or site notices to let you know if an area near you is being considered as an allocated site for development.
Where considered appropriate, we will arrange exhibitions in public places during consultation periods. At events, we will provide feedback questionnaires.
Public exhibitions
Site notices
and posters
NNDC Website
We may arrange workshops to get feedback on specific issues. In particular, workshops can be used as a way of getting feedback from hard‐to‐reach groups.
Workshops
How will we get members of the public involved?
Social Media
Public meetings
Newsletters
News releases
We will endeavor to keep our Facebook and Twitter pages up to date with plan‐
making news. We will issue news releases to inform local media when we reach key stages. We may also use news releases to advise of upcoming consultation events.
We may hold public meetings to discuss specific plan‐making issues. At events, we will provide feedback questionnaires.
Throughout the plan‐
making process, we will send out newsletters either electronically or by post. To add your details to the list, please email us on planning.policy@north‐
norfolk.gov.uk or call us
on 01263 516318.
Figure 4 How will we get members of the public involved in Plan-making?
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
48
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
How to get involved 3
Neighbourhood Planning
Neighbourhood Planning is another way you can get involved in shaping your community. You
(6)
can find out more about getting involved in Neighbourhood Planning by visiting our website .
3.9
Neighbourhood Planning gives communities the opportunity to produce a vision on how they
want their local area to develop and grow. Provided that the community’s vision is in line with
the strategic needs and priorities of the wider local area, they will be able to choose where
new development is built and what it will look like.
3.10
Neighbourhood Planning is led by a Parish or Town Council, a neighbourhood forum or a
community organisation (in the case of a Community Right to Build Order). Communities can
choose to set planning policies through a Neighbourhood Plan and grant planning permission
through Neighbourhood Development Orders and Community Right to Build Orders for specific
development. Figure 5 on the following page shows the neighbourhood planning process.
6
49
NNDC, Neighbourhood Planning - http://www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/planning/10014.asp
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
9 November 2015
13
14
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
3 How to get involved
Neighbourhood Planning
Stage 1
Designating neighbourhood area and if appropriate neighbourhood forum
Stage 2
Preparing a draft neighbourhood plan or Order
Stage 3
Pre‐submission publicity and consultation
What is involved?
• Qualifying body (town/parish council, prospective
neighbourhood forum or community organisation) submits
application to NNDC to designate a neighbourhood area.
• NNDC publicises and consults on the area application for a
minimum of 6 weeks (or 4 weeks where the area to which the
application relates is the whole of the area of a parish council
and fully within area of one Local Planning Authority);
• In an area without a town or parish council, a prospective
neighbourhood forum submits an application to be the
designated neighbourhood forum for a neighbourhood area.
NNDC publicises and consults on the forum application for a
minimum of 6 weeks.
• NNDC decide whether to designate the neighbourhood
area/neighbourhood forum.
• Gathering of information and evidence;
• Consultation by qualifying body with other public bodies,
landowners and the development industry whose interest it
considers may be affected by the draft plan or Order;
• Identification and assessment of options;
• Determination as to whether a plan or an Order is likely to
have significant environmental effects.
• Qualifying body invites public representations and consults
relevant consultees. Minimum of 6 weeks consultation.
• Copy of draft plan or Order to NNDC;
• Where European Obligations apply, compliance with relevant
publicity and consultation requirements.
Stage 4
Formal consideration of representations
• Qualifying body formally considers of representations made.
• Preparation of consultation statement and other proposal
documents.
Stage 5
Neighbourhood plan or Order proposal submitted to NNDC
• Providing NNDC finds that the submitted proposal complies
with relevant legislation, the proposal is publicised for a
minimum of 6 weeks and public representations invited and
consultees referred to in the consultation statement notified;
• Independent examiner appointed.
Stage 6
Independent Examination
Stage 7
Referendum and bringing of
plan or Order brought into force
• An independent examiner tests whether a draft plan or Order
meets a number of conditions (as set out in paragraph 8 of
Schedule 4B to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as
amended)). In some cases, the examiner may hold a hearing;
• Independent examiner publishes report for NNDC to consider
and reach own view (with the exception of community right to
build orders where the report in binding);
• NNDC decides whether to send the plan/Order to referendum.
• NNDC publishes information statement;
• Referendum polling takes place;
• Depending on results and if the plan/Order is compatible with
European Union (EU) obligations and does not breach
Convention rights, NNDC brings the plan or Order into force.
Figure 5 The Neighbourhood Planning process
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
50
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
How to get involved 3
Planning Applications
3.11
Members of the public and relevant consultees have the opportunity to make representations
on development, uses or works that require planning permission or listed building consent.
For the majority of applications, there will be a formal period of at least 21 days in which you
can let us know whether you wish to object, support or comment on a proposal. Representations
made after the 21 days formal consultation period will be accepted, providing they are made
before a decision is issued. Figure 6 on the following page shows the planning application
process and indicates at which stages the public can get involved. From time to time,
Government legislation and regulations on what LPAs are required to do as part of these
processes changes. If this happens, the process tables in this document will be updated and
an amended document published.
3.12
Once applications have been received, they will generally be determined as submitted. There
are occasions, however, when amendments can help to deliver better development in the
wider public interest. The decision to re-advertise and re-consult on accepted amendments
will depend on whether there is a significant change to the nature, character or description of
the development and whether it is considered that a neighbour would be adversely affected
by the change.
3.13
After a decision is made, NNDC will exercise caution in agreeing to accept further amendments
to applications. However, in principle some non-material amendments may be permissible
providing particular criteria are met, for example, the amendment would not materially alter
the description or appearance of the approved development.
3.14
Certain development, such as minor changes to dwelling houses, is often exempt from the
need to obtain planning permission. Development not requiring planning permission is described
as Permitted Development and is detailed in The Town and Country Planning (General
Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015. You can get more information on what
householder development can be carried out under permitted development rights via the
(7)
(8)
Governments Planning Portal Interactive House , Interactive Terrace , and the accompanying
(9)
Technical Guidance .
Whilst we are unable to accept verbal representations on planning applications, there are a
number of ways you can contact us to give us your views on planning applications:
Email us: planning@north-norfolk.gov.uk
Make an on-line comment: Via the ‘Search Planning Applications’ option at
www.north-norfolk.gov.uk
Write to us: Planning Department, NNDC, Holt Road, Cromer, NR27 9EN
You can track the progress of individual planning applications on the NNDC website Search
(10)
for a planning application
or by speaking to the Case Officer or a member of the Planning
Technical team (telephone 01263 516150)
7
8
9
10
Interactive House - http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/permission/house
Interactive Terrace - http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/permission/terrace
Technical Guidance - http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/100806_PDforhouseholders_TechnicalGuidance.pdf
Search for a planning application - https://planning.northnorfolk.org/online-applications
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
51
9 November 2015
15
16
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
3 How to get involved
Preapplication
Applicants are encouraged to use our Preapplication Advice Service (11)
Submission guidance can also be found on our
Planning Application Requirements page (12).
Also see Do you need planning permission
page (13) and Major pre-application consultation
page (14).
We expect developers for major development to
support applications with statements explaining what
community consultation has been done, the outcome
of consultations and any amendments made to the
scheme as a result.
Community consultation is mandatory for wind
turbine applications involving 2 or more turbines or
any turbines with a hub height of 15m or more.
Application
Most valid applications are subject to a
minimum of 21 days consultation in
accordance with The Town and Country
Planning (Development Management
Procedure (England) Order 2015) (15). For
further information on consultees please see
the National Planning Practice Guidance (16).
Local Councillors are notified when there is an
application in their ward.
- Plans and details available to view at Council
offices;
- Published online- Search & Comment on an
Application; (19)
- Yellow site notice/s erected on or near site;
- Letters to adjoining neighbours;
- Plans and details sent to Parish/Town Council;
- Statutory consultees invited to comment;
- Press advert in the local newspaper.
For further information see statutory publicity
requirements (16)
Participation
Representations can be sent to the Council
during the 21 days public consultation period.
Representations made after the 21 days can
only be considered until a decision is made.
Have your say on Planning Applications and
Tree Preservation Orders (17)
Officer
Report
The case officer considers the application and
prepares a report and recommendation.
Decision
The majority of decisions on planning
applications are made under the authority
delegated to the Head of Planning. A small
number of applications are called in and
decided by the Council’s Development
Committee.
Decision
Notice
issued
The decision notice is sent to the applicant
/agent and published on-line. Those who have
made representations on the application are
notified of the decision.
Appeal
An applicant may choose to appeal a refused
planning application or appeal against nondetermination of a planning application. More
information can be found on the Council’s
planning appeals page (18).
Only representations that contain valid material
planning considerations can be taken into
account. For examples of material and nonmaterial considerations see Appendix 3.
If the application is considered at Committee,
there is an opportunity for members of the
public and other interested bodies to speak.
Have your say on Planning Applications and
Tree Preservation Orders (17)
Figure 6 The Planning Application Process
(11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19)
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Pre-application advice service - http://www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/planning/19650.asp
Planning Application Requirements - http://www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/planning/19912.asp
Do you need Planning Permission - http://www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/planning/19637.asp
Major Development pre-application consultations - http://www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/planning/19988.asp
Schedule 4 of The Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure (England) Order 2015) http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2015/595/schedule/4/made
Statutory publicity requirements for planning and heritage applications (Planning Practice Guidance) http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance/consultation-and-pre-decision-matters
Have your say on Planning Applications and Tree Preservation Orders http://www.northnorfolk.org/files/Have_your_say_leaflet_website_version.pdf
Planning Appeals - http://www.northnorfolk.org/planning/19965.asp
Search & comment on an application - http://www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/planning/19804.asp
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
52
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
Appendices
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
53
9 November 2015
17
18
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
1 Consultation Bodies
1 Consultation Bodies
Specific Consultation Bodies
1.1
Government regulations require that the following specific consultation bodies must be consulted
when the Local Planning Authority considers that they may have an interest in the subject of
the Local Plan / other planning documents:
Town and Parish Councils within and adjoining the North Norfolk administrative boundaries
Adjoining Local Authorities: Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk, Breckland
Council, Broads Authority, Broadland District Council and Great Yarmouth Borough
Council
Norfolk County Council
The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (Historic England)
Natural England
The Environment Agency
Lead Local Flood Authority (Norfolk County Council)
Relevant sewage undertaker
Relevant water undertaker
Clinical Commissioning Groups in the East of England Region (CCGs) (or successor
health care bodies)
Norfolk Constabulary
Police and Crime Commissioner for Norfolk
Relevant electronic communication companies
Relevant electricity companies
Relevant gas companies
The Homes and Communities Agency
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE)
Network Rail
The Secretary of State for Transport
The Gardens Trust
Sport England
The Ministry of Defence
The Marine Management Organisation
The Coal Authority
It should be noted that this list is not exhaustive and may change overtime as legislation and regulations
are updated.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
54
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
Consultation Bodies 1
General Consultation Bodies
1.2
Government regulations require that the following general consultation bodies must be consulted
when the Local Planning Authority considers it appropriate.
Bodies which represent the following in the District:
Different racial, ethnic or national groups
Different religious groups
Disabled persons
Persons carrying on business
Community groups
Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople
Older or younger people
Health
The environment
The coast
The economy
Education
The historic environment
Tourism
Regeneration
Transport
Sport and recreation
Voluntary bodies some or all of whose activities benefit any part of the District
Bodies which provide Public services in the District
Local Enterprise Partnerships
Interested individuals
It should be noted that this list is not exhaustive and may change overtime as legislation and regulations
are updated.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
55
9 November 2015
19
20
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
1 Consultation Bodies
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
56
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
Duty to Cooperate Stakeholders 2
2 Duty to Cooperate Stakeholders
Duty to Cooperate Stakeholders
2.1
Part 2, Regulation 4 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Development) (England)
Regulations 2012, identifies Duty to Cooperate stakeholders. The below are those bodies
identified as stakeholders:
The Environment Agency
The Historic Buildings and Monuments Commission for England (Historic England)
Natural England
The Civil Aviation Authority
The Homes and Communities Agency
Relevant Clinical Commissioning Groups in the East of England Region (CCGs) (or
successor health care bodies)
The Office of Rail Regulation
Integrated Transport Authorities
County Council Highways
The Marine Management Organisation
New Anglia Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP)
Wild Anglia Local Nature Partnership (LNP)
Norfolk Local Planning Authorities: Broadland District Council, Breckland District Council,
Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk, Broads Authority, Great Yarmouth
Borough Council, Norwich City Council, South Norfolk Council, and Norfolk County Council
(Norfolk Duty to Co-operate Member Forum).
It should be noted that this list is not exhaustive and may change overtime as legislation and regulations
are updated.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
57
9 November 2015
21
22
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
2 Duty to Cooperate Stakeholders
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
58
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
Material Planning Considerations 3
3 Material Planning Considerations
What are material planning considerations?
3.1
The following list gives some typical examples of material and non-material planning
considerations. Only material planning considerations can be taken into account when reaching
a decision.
Material Planning Considerations
National and Local Policy
Planning history and previous appeal decisions
Case Law
Design, appearance, layout and density
Impact on visual or residential amenity including potential loss of light or overshadowing, loss
of privacy, noise disturbance, smell or nuisance, overbearing impact;
Impact on trees, listed buildings, conservation areas, public right(s) of way, highway safety
and traffic
Non-material Planning Considerations
Land/boundary disputes, including rights of access
Construction noise
Effect on property values
Loss of view
Restrictive covenants
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
59
9 November 2015
23
24
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
3 Material Planning Considerations
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
60
9 November 2015
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
Further Advice 4
4 Further Advice
Contact details and further resources
North Norfolk District Council Advice
www.north-norfolk.gov.uk/planning
Planning Duty Officer
planning@north-norfolk.gov.uk
01263 516158
Development Management Team
planning@north-norfolk.gov.uk
01263 516150
Major Projects Team
planning@north-norfolk.gov.uk
01263 516150
Planning Policy Team
planningpolicy@north-norfolk.gov.uk
01263 516318
Conservation, Design & Landscape Team
conservationanddesign@north-norfolk.gov.uk
trees@north-norfolk.gov.uk
01263 516165
External Advice
Planning Aid
The Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) service 'Planning Aid' offers professional planning advice
and support to individuals and communities who cannot afford to pay professional fees. They help
to provide the tools and knowledge to help engage people in local planning.
www.rtpi.org.uk/planning-aid
advice@planningaid.rtpi.org.uk
0330 123 9244
Planning Aid Direct
This useful resource offers an online knowledge base and step by step answers to frequently asked
questions about planning. http://www.rtpi.org.uk/planning-aid/planning-aid-direct
Planning Portal
The Planning Portal in the online planning resource for England and Wales.
www.planningportal.gov.uk
GOV.UK
Provides information on all Government services.
www.gov.uk
In particular, information can be found at http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/policy
(National Planning Policy Framework) and http://planningguidance.planningportal.gov.uk/blog/guidance
(Planning Practice Guidance).
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
61
9 November 2015
25
26
Draft Statement of Community Involvement
4 Further Advice
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
62
9 November 2015
Appendix 3 - Consultation responses summary
Rep.
Ref.
SCI 01
Respondent
Historic England
Kayleigh Wood
Policy /
paragraph
Para. 1.5
Para. 3.4
Appendix 1.2
Nature of
Rep.
Comment
Summary of representation






SCI 02
N/A
Comment

SCI 03
Neatishead
Parish Council
Gareth Pritchard
Natural England
Carla Jackson,
Consultations
Team
N/A
Comment

SCI 04
Brian Grieves
N/A
Comment



SCI 05
SCI 06
Breckland District
Council
James Mann,
Planning Policy
Officer
Anglian Water
Sue Bull,
Welcomes general aims and approach to the draft
SCI.
At para. 1.5 the term ‘built heritage’ should be
changed to ‘historic environment’.
At para. 3.4 welcomes acknowledgement of Historic
England as a statutory consultee.
Would welcome consultation at an informal level in
addition to legislative requirements where relevant.
Would be helpful to receive hard copies of
consultation letters.
Para 1.2 welcomes and supports inclusion of the
‘historic environment’ as a topic to cover General
Consultation Bodies.
The process provides a structured means of early
consultation and response from all interested
parties.
Supportive of principle of meaningful and early
engagement of the general community, community
organisations and statutory bodies in local planning
matters.
No specific comments on this consultation.
Display of yellow planning application for
development notices is not sufficiently prominent.
Should be displayed on the public highway at the
entrance to the access / road to the site not just
attached to the property boundary fence at the end
of a Loke or cul-de-sac where few will see it.
Consider impacts of proposals on Conservation
Areas, proposals should be non-intrusive.
N/A
Comment

Would like to remain a statutory consultee but have
no comment to make at present time.
N/A
Comment

Welcomes consultation on Local Plan documents
and relevant planning applications.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
63
Council response
Accepted, however, paragraph 1.5 refers to the
Council’s Corporate Plan, which outlines our
shared vision, values and priority areas on which
we intend to concentrate our efforts. Since the
draft SCI has been out to consultation, a new
Corporate Plan has been approved by full Council
and the reference to ‘built heritage’ no longer
exists.
Noted.
Noted.
Noted: Concern passed onto the Development
Manager and the Major Developments Manager.
Accepted: Any new Local Plan will need to
consider development impact on the historic
environment, which includes Conservation Areas.
Noted
Noted
9 November 2015
Planning Liaison
Manager
SCI 07
Anglia Maltings
(Holdings) Ltd
David Thompson,
Chief Executive


N/A
Objection



Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
Keen to work with and support NNDC in growth
ambitions.
keen to respond to all Local Plan document
consultations and all major (10+) planning
applications and other applications where there may
be concerns or issues relating to water supply
and/or drainage.
Does not support the general aims and approach of
the SCI.
Purpose of the SCI is to develop a good NNDC
Local Plan and to have this endorsed by the
community generally. The Local Plan is the focus.
The SCI does not connect with the general purposes
of the Local Plan or the NNDC Economic
Development Strategy for two reasons:
o Does not reference the 10 key objectives
and therefore does not focus on addressing
these, and;
o ‘Community’ is implicitly Parish and Town
Council led; it omits other stakeholders;
employees, employers, investors,
enterpreneurs, shop-keepers. Thus the SCI
does not invite, explicitly, economic
participation.
o SCI is a general ‘hand-book’ on consultation
but omits the context in which previous
policy was developed, and how it should be
amended and developed further. It is
published in a vacuum.
64
Not accepted: The SCI document is not
considered the right place to make reference to
objectives in evidence documents. New evidence
produced as part of the evidence base to inform
the new Local Plan will be in the public domain
once published.
The purpose of the SCI is to ensure that
communities and other interested parties
understand how they can participate in the
planning process and covers participation at both
the plan-making and the planning application
stage. Whilst it is not realistic for the SCI to
specifically mention every possible stakeholder, it
aims to make it clear that the Council wants ‘to
give everyone the opportunity to get involved from
an early stage in the process and we want to
make engagement as easy and as meaningful as
possible’ (para. 1.2). Further, Appendix 1.2 makes
it clear that the LPA will consult general
consultation bodies where considered appropriate
and the list includes bodies representing persons
carrying on business and the economy, LEPs and
interested individuals.
9 November 2015
Appendix 4 – Summary of changes to the SCI
Paragraph or page number
Suggested Change
Reason for Change
Page 3, para. 1.5
Change to the referenced Council’s Corporate Plan vision, values
and priority areas on which we intend to concentrate our efforts to:
jobs and the local economy, housing and infrastructure, coast and
countryside, health and well-being and delivery and service
excellence.
Since the draft SCI has been out to consultation, a new Corporate Plan
has been approved by full Council and the reference to ‘built heritage’
no longer exists.
Page 9, new paragraph after
3.5
Addition of new paragraph:
To enable the SCI to be updated should planning legislation and
regulations on consultation change.
Page 10, table 2
Amendment to Stage 3 text, bullet point 3:
3.6 The processes that will be followed when producing a new
local plan, any resulting SPDs and for any neighbourhood plans are
outlined in the tables on pages 10, 11 and 14. From time to time,
Government legislation and regulations on what LPAs are required
to do as part of these processes changes. If this happens, the
process tables in this document will be updated and an amended
document published.
The Council may undertake consultation with stakeholders and
members of the public on different issues and options.
Page 15, para. 3.11
Addition to para. 3.11:
From time to time, Government legislation and regulations on what
LPAs are required to do as part of these processes changes. If this
happens, the process tables in this document will be updated and
an amended document published.
Page 18, para. 1.1
Change of name of The Garden History Society to The Gardens
Trust.
Planning Policy & Built Heritage
Working Party
65
To enable flexibility on consultation should planning legislation and
regulations on consultation change.
To enable the SCI to be updated should planning legislation and
regulations on consultation change.
The Garden History Society has now merged with the Association of
Gardens Trusts to form The Gardens Trust, which is now the statutory
consultee.
9 November 2015