International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) – Volume 23 Number 6- May 2015
Sophisticated Routing Protocols Survey in the
Presence of Warm Whole Attack in MANET
Preety Thakur*1and Satbir Singh*2
#
M.Tech Scholar
Dept. of Electronics Technology, GNDU, Regional Campus, Gurdaspur, Punjab (India).
Abstract---- Mobile Ad Hoc Network (MANET) is a commonly correspondence in light of a scattered organization. It has an element
topology and there is not any main issue for system administration. The element topology character of MANET has created it helpless
and exposed to distinctive security assaults. In this paper we think about the impacts of Wormhole assault on MANET utilizing both
Proactive steering convention (OLSR) and Reactive directing convention (AODV). The reason for this study is to discover which
convention is more helpless against the wormhole assault and which calculations can be utilized for its avoidance.
Keywords---- MANET, Wormhole, powerless, AODV, OLSR.
I. INTRODUCTION
A Mobile specially appointed system (MANET) is an
orchestrating toward oneself arrangement of movable hubs
in which systems speak with one another by means of remote
connections with no base or concentrated organization, for
example, access focuses. The security issues of these systems
are in view of the absence of a trusted unified power, simple
bundle losing on account of imparted remote medium,
dynamic topology, low transmission capacity and battery
power. In addition, in MANET bunch correspondence the
security issue is extremely challengeable as a result of
numerous senders and various beneficiaries. Numerous sorts
of assaults, for example, Black hole assaults, Grayhole
assaults and Wormhole assaults can harm the MANET.
As indicated by Rahman et.al directing conventions in
MANETs are partitioned into three classifications
specifically Table-Driven steering conventions (Proactive),
On Demand directing conventions (Reactive) and Hybrid.
These classifications partitioned into some sub classes.
According to Mamatha, G. S et.al the steering assaults in
MANETs are grouped to two classifications Attacks
specifically latent assaults and dynamic assaults. The
dynamic assault incorporates diverse sorts of assaults, for
example, MAC layer, system layer, transport layer and
application layer assaults. In this paper, we concentrate on
wormhole assault that has a place with classification of
system layer assaults. Kumar.s says that there are two
primary steering convention proposed for MANET: specially
appointed on-interest separation vector (AODV) and
advanced connection state directing convention (OLSR).
AODV fit in with on-interest steering conventions and OLSR
is a table-driven directing convention.
ISSN: 2231-5381
In this paper, we will demonstrate AODV and OLSR steering
convention on the grounds that these conventions are
defenseless against the wormhole assault.
This paper is sorted out as takes after as the following, In
segment II we examine the OLSR and AODV directing
convention in point of interest. Section III exhibit the
attributes of the wormhole assault on AODV and OLSR. At
last we finish up in segment IV.
II. AODV AND OLSR ROUTING PROTOCOL
Satoshi Kurosawaet.al, proposed that Ad-Hoc On-Demand
Distance Vector (AODV) is a receptive directing convention
in which the system produces courses toward the begin of
correspondence. Rehman , I.U. S. et.al, proposed that AODV
orchestrates a course to a destination just when a hub needs to
send a bundle to that destination. Courses are kept up the
length of they are required by the source. Grouping numbers
guarantee the freshness of courses and certification of circle
free directing. AODV additionally gives topology data to the
hub. AODV manufactures courses utilizing a course ask for
course answer question cycle. At the point when a source hub
fancies a course to a destination for which it doesn't have a
course, it shows a course that ask for route request (RREQ)
over the system. Hubs getting this parcel overhaul their data
for the source hub and set up in reverse pointers to the source
hub in the course tables. Notwithstanding the source hub's,
current succession number, IP address and show ID, the route
request (RREQ) likewise contains the latest grouping number
for the destination of which the source hub is mindful. A hub
getting the RREQ may send a course answer i.e (RREP) on
the off chance that it is either the destination or in the event
that it has a course to the destination with a comparing
arrangement number more prominent than or equivalent to
that contained in the RREQ. On the off chance that this is the
http://www.ijettjournal.org
Page 281
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) – Volume 23 Number 6- May 2015
situation, it unicasts a RREP back to the source. Else, it
rebroadcasts the RREQ. On the off chance that they get a
RREQ which they have effectively prepared, they toss the
RREQ and don't forward it. As the RREP spreads back to the
source, hubs set up forward pointers to the destination. When
the source hub gets the RREP, it may start to forward
information parcels to the destination. On the off chance that
the source later gets a RREP containing a more noteworthy
succession number or contains the same arrangement number
with a littler bounce check, it may overhaul its directing data
for that destination and start utilizing the better course. The
length of the course stays dynamic; it will keep on being kept
up. On the off chance that a connection break happens while
the course is finished. In the wake of getting the RERR, if the
source hub still yearnings the course, it can reinitiate course
revelation.
C
B
D
A
E
G
H
L
I
K
Fig. 2 RREP Propagation Route (Route Reply)
As indicated by Rahman et.al that Optimized Link State
Routing convention (OLSR) is a proactive convention. This
convention made upon connection state calculation. OLSR
enhance a connection state convention and pack the data size
of a send messages, and decline the retransmission bundles.
OLSR has a property of having the courses promptly
accessible when required; it is a result of its proactive nature.
In a connection state convention, all the connections are
announced to neighbor hubs and overwhelmed in the system.
OLSR is an advancement of connection state convention for
MANET.
III. WORMHOLE ATTACK IN AODV AND OLSR
Wormhole assault is an unsafe assault for MANETs. When
accepting a vindictive hub parcel in this assault from one area
in the system, it associate with different areas in the system,
and now that its out in the open according to Mahajan et.al,
these parcels are sent into the system redundantly. This
association goes about as a wormhole for the passage interface
two aggressors. In this assault Rai et.al displays that the
aggressor make a wormhole relying upon the sort of system
association (Wired or Wireless) notwithstanding for parcels
with no locations to itself in light of the telecast way of these
two sorts of systems. As indicated by Keer et.al , Wormhole
assaults can be master minded effectively. For making a
wormhole assault, not less than two handsets are situated at
distinctive areas on a remote system by assailant. Likewise,
after plan of a wormhole, an assailant can without much of a
stretch befuddle direct to oversee parcels through the
wormhole. Maulik et.al propounds the wormhole assaults into
two of the accompanying gatherings:
• In –band wormhole assault, which covers the current remote
medium through a shrouded covering.
Fig .1 Requests broadcast (Route request)
• Out-of-band wormhole assault, which interface two
threateningly hubs through equipment channel.
A
G
F
B
H
E
C
I
Fig . 3 (a) in- band wormhole (b) out-of-band wormhole
D
ISSN: 2231-5381
http://www.ijettjournal.org
Page 282
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) – Volume 23 Number 6- May 2015
IV. CONCLUSION
In this study we analyzed the wormhole attack in malicious
nodes network. In a network it is important for a protocol to
be effective and efficient in term of security. Therefore, the
application of MANET that uses proactive routing protocol is
more trusted compared to the reactive one, when more than
one attacker exists in the network. This paper also includes the
prevention of wormhole attack using OLSR and AODV
routing protocols. This research survey also presents the state
of art of wormhole attack in MANET. For future work, we
have recommended a novel solution that uses Bacteria
Foraging Optimization (BFO) technique for optimizing the
positions of multiple base stations randomly in the entire
network to help in improving the likelihood of packets from
sensor nodes reaching at least one BS in the network in the
presence of large black hole regions, thus ensuring high
success rate.
REFERNCES
[1 ]
Rahman, M. A. et.al, “A Simulation Based Performance Comparison
of
Routing Protocol on Mobile Ad-hoc Network (Proactive, Reactive and
Hybrid),” International Conference on Computer and Communication
Engineering Kuala lumpur Malaysia,2010, IEEE.
[2]
Mittal, S. et.al , “Performance comparison of AODV, DSR and ZRP
Routing protocols in MANETs,” International Conference on Advances in
Computing, Control, and Telecommunication Technologies, 2009, IEEE.
[3] Mamatha, G. S. , & Sharma, S. C.,” Network Layer Attacks and Defense
Mechanisms in MANETS- A Survey,” International Journal of Computer
Applications Volume 9(9).
[4] Kumar, S. et.al, “AODV and OLSR routing protocols for Wireless Adhoc and Mesh Networks,” International Conference of computer and
Communication Technology (ICCCT), 2010, IEEE.
[5]
Satoshi Kurosawa, et.al,.” Detecting Black hole Attack on AODV
based Mobile Ad hoc networks by Dynamic Learning Method,” International
Journal of Network Security, Vol.5, No.3, PP.338–346, Nov 2007.
[6] Rehman, I.U et.al, “Analysis of Black Hole attack On MANETs Using
different MANET Routing Protocols,” [Ronneby, 2010].
[7]
Mahajan., Natu et.al, A., “Analysis of wormhole intrusion attacks in
MANETs,” [2008, IEEE].
[8]
Rai, A. K., et.al, “ Different Types of Attacks on Integrated MANETInternet Communication,” International Journal of Computer Science and
Security (IJCSS) Volume (4) Issue (3) Nov 2010.
[9]
Keer, S.et.al. “To Prevent Wormhole Attacks Using Wireless Protocol
in MANET,” International journal on computer and communication
technology [2010, IEEE]
[10] Maulik, R. et.al, “A Study on Wormhole Attacks in MANET,”
International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial
Management Applications, 3, 2011.
ISSN: 2231-5381
http://www.ijettjournal.org
Page 283