INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
GROUP OF EXPERTS TO PREPARE
FOR PP-02 ON ITU REFORM
GENEVA
—
FIRST MEETING
—
Document GEC/4(Rev.2)-E
16 November 2001
Original: English
(24-26 OCTOBER 2001)
REPORT TO THE COUNCIL BY THE GROUP OF EXPERTS
TO PREPARE FOR PP-02 ON ITU REFORM
1
In accordance with the provisions of Resolution 1186 of the Council, the Group of Experts
charged with making preparations for the 2002 Plenipotentiary Conference in regard to ITU reform
hereby submits its final report to the Council.
2
The chairman of the Group, Mr. Berrada (Morocco), prepared a working document with the
assistance of the Legal Unit. The document was circulated electronically to the designated Experts
and several contributions were received from them. This allowed the Group to hold a single
meeting on 24 and 25 October 2001 at the Union’s headquarters.
3
In all, 29 participants representing 16 Member States were in attendance (see the list of
participants contained in Appendix 1).
4
The agenda of the meeting can be found at http://www.itu.int/council/gecreform/agenda-e.doc
5
The terms of reference of the Group of Experts, as set out by the Council in
Resolution 1186, were “to prepare the required draft texts for amending the Constitution and
Convention, and draft Resolutions if appropriate, related to the recommendations designated in
resolves 1) of Resolution 1181[*], taking account of the discussions in the Council on these
recommendations. Where it considers it appropriate the group may develop one or more
alternatives”. The group considered its terms of reference to be very clear, and to necessitate no
particular observations. It also considered that, if it felt the need to present alternatives, it should
limit their number insofar as it could.
6
The group examined all the recommendations pertaining to its terms of reference and its
conclusions in regard to each are set forth in the annex to this report. The conclusions take the form
of draft texts (draft amendments to the Constitution or Convention, and draft resolutions if
appropriate) where the Group felt that such texts could and should be prepared; or, where the Group
felt that drafting a text was not necessary, or in some instances not feasible, its conclusions are
simply presented as comments.
7
It is to be recalled that, as indicated above, the task of the Group was limited to preparing
draft texts. In so doing, the Group does not necessarily endorse the content of the recommendations
submitted to it.
A. BERRADA
Président
Annex : 1
Appendix : 1
____________________
*
The recommendations in question are: R5b), 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 20, 24 and 29.
D:\282224963.DOC
30.05.16
-2-
ANNEX
Recommendation 5 - Elections to RRB
R5
b)
WGR recommends that:
with respect to the question of their nationality, the members of RRB should not be
included in CS62; a separate provision should stipulate that the members of RRB shall not
be from the same country as the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau.
GEC proposals
MOD CS 62 b) the Secretary-General, the Deputy Secretary-General and the Directors of the
Bureaux shall be elected among the candidates proposed by Member States as
their nationals and shall all be nationals of different Member States, and at their
election due consideration should be given to equitable geographical
distribution amongst the regions of the world; due consideration should also be
given to the principles embodied in No. 154 of this Constitution;
MOD CS 63 c) the members of the Radio Regulations Board shall be elected in their individual
capacity from among the candidates proposed by Member States as their
nationals.Each Member State may propose only one candidate.The members of
the Radio Regulations Board shall not be nationals of the same Member State
as the Director of the Radiocommunication Bureau; at their election due
consideration should be given to equitable geographical distribution amongst
the regions of the world and to the principles embodied in No. 93 of this
Constitution.
Recommendation 8 - Telecommunication Development Sector
R8
a)
b)
WGR recommends that the Council decide, in the light of ongoing developments in the
telecommunication environment, that the mission and role of ITU-D be strengthened to:
concentrate on the needs of Member States and Sector Members from the developing
countries;
provide a forum for policy-makers, regulators and Sector Members from developing
countries to meet among themselves and with those from developed countries and to share
information, experience and ideas on policy and regulatory matters with the aim of
fostering development.
GEC comments
The GEC considers that the WGR Recommendation 8 and accompanying comments cover the
following points:
1)
Dual function of the Development Sector: This dual function is clearly defined in No. 118
of the Constitution, and it does not seem necessary to amend that provision or add a new
one for this purpose.
D:\282224963.DOC
30.05.16
-3-
2)
Catalytic role of the Sector: Provision is already made for aid and assistance to Member
States in Nos. 122, 124, 125, 126 and 129 of the Constitution and in Nos. 211 and 214 of
the Convention. The matter is also dealt with in Resolution 26 (Kyoto, 1994) and
Resolution 30 (Kyoto, 1994) for the LDCs. Furthermore, the idea already appears in
Resolution 71 (Minneapolis, 1998) containing the strategic plan. Accordingly, it is
recommended that no change should be made in the Constitution or the Convention to
cover this aspect.
3)
Approval of recent ITU-D activities: All the activities cited are mentioned directly or
indirectly in Article 21 of the Constitution and Articles 16-18 of the Convention. If
necessary, specific references could be included in the strategic plan to ensure that the
measures taken were appropriate in the light of the rapid changes in the telecommunication
sector.
4)
Priorities set by regional organizations: ITU-D operates within the context of priorities set
in the strategic plan. The priorities set by regional organizations could be complementary to
those in the strategic plan. BDT then has to take due account of the priorities set by regional
organizations when preparing or applying a strategic plan. It is not therefore considered
necessary that any amendment to that effect should be made to the Constitution and
Convention.
5)
Concentration on the needs of Member States and Sector Members from the developing
countries: The provisions of the Constitution and Convention mentioned above refer more
than once to the needs of developing countries, without specifying whether action in that
area is confined to Member States or extends to the whole telecommunication sector in
developing countries. It is for each Member State to determine the aid that such Sector
Members might receive from BDT. It does not therefore seem necessary to refer to Sector
Members, as called for in Recommendation 8a).
6)
As far as Recommendation 8b) is concerned, it is essentially covered by the comments in
§ 3 above.
Consequently, the GEC considers that no amendment to the Constitution and Convention is
required.
Furthermore, the Director of BDT should consider the content of this Recommendation for possible
inclusion in the strategic plan.
Recommendation 9 - Creation of "project management groups"
R9
WGR recommends project management groups in place of study groups.
GEC comments
The GEC was informed that TDAG examined the matter and considered that Project Management
Groups should not be considered as replacing existing Study Groups. The Recommendations shall
continue to be approved in accordance with existing procedures as defined in the Constitution and
Convention. If this is the case, the Telecommunication Development Sector may create such PMGs
without amending the Constitution and Convention. This situation may change if the forthcoming
WTDC does not endorse TDAG views.
D:\282224963.DOC
30.05.16
-4-
Recommendation 10 - Empowering the Telecommunication Development
Advisory Group
R10
WGR recommends that the Constitution and Convention should be amended to allow a
WTDC to assign specific matters within its competence to TDAG, indicating the action
required on those matters; and that WTDC-02 should consider assigning specific matters to
TDAG pending approval of this amendment by PP-02.
GEC proposals
MOD CV 213A
3
A world telecommunication development conference may assign
specific matters within its competence to the telecommunication development
advisory group indicating the action required on those matters.
ADD CV 215 JA
6bis)
Prepare a report for the world telecommunication development
conference on the matters assigned to it in accordance with No. 213A and
transmit it to the Director for submission to the conference.
Recommendation 11 - Telecommunication Development Bureau
R11
WGR recommends that the revenues generated by BDT in implementing funds-in-trust and
other similar projects should be maintained for development projects. In order to do so, the
support-cost expenditure for these projects should be outside the limitation on expenditure
of the Union.
GEC comments
The GEC considers that actual expenditure over the four-year period may be greater or less than the
estimate. When the actual income is greater than that shown in the Financial Plan, a corresponding
increase in expenditure is authorized under paragraph 1.3 of Decision 5 (Minneapolis, 1998). This
Recommendation has been and will continue to be considered by the Working Group of the Council
on Financial Regulations.
Recommendation 13 - Contribution by Sector Members towards defraying the
expenses of the Union (Resolution 90 (Minneapolis, 1998) and Council-99
Resolution 1132)
R13
WGR recommends that Sector Member contributions should go directly to the activities of
their Sector.
GEC comments
This Recommendation is closely related to Recommendation 14 which is not within the terms of
reference of the GEC. Furthermore, the Secretary-General was instructed to carry out a
comprehensive study of Recommendations 11, 12, 13 and 14 and will report to the Working Group
of the Council on Financial Regulations.
It should be noted that, in its comments on Recommendation 14, the Working Group on
ITU Reform stated that “in the event that a decision is taken to manage the budget of each Sector in
an independent way, some Member States consider it necessary to take into consideration the
possibility of giving the same transparency and visibility to the contributions of Member States as a
whole as would be done for Sector Members”.
D:\282224963.DOC
30.05.16
-5-
Recommendation 15 - Linkage of strategic, operational and financial planning
R15
WGR recommends that, beginning immediately after PP-02, a rolling four-year financial
and operational plan should be produced by the Sectors and the General Secretariat that
could be reviewed by the Sector advisory groups and approved by the Council and linked
with the Strategic Plan (to be examined and updated at regular intervals for full
implementation as soon as practicable). Such reviews should be undertaken within the
context of a review of, and in preparation of, the Financial Plan and closely linked to
preparation of the biennial budget-setting exercises.
GEC proposals
ADD CV 61A
10bis
While at all times respecting the financial limits as adopted by the
Plenipotentiary Conference, the Council may, as appropriate, review and
update the strategic plan and inform the Member States and Sector Members
accordingly.
Recommendation 17 - Use of the ITU official and working languages
R17
WGR recommends that, on the basis of an analysis of the first stages of the transition to
full-scale use of the six official and working languages, it should be proposed that
Council-01 consider a possible time-frame for such a transition with a view to taking a final
decision at PP-02. 1 January 2005 could be defined as a tentative date for such a transition.
GEC proposals
DRAFT RESOLUTION
Use of the six official and working languages of
the Union on an equal footing
The Plenipotentionary Conference (Marrakech, 2002),
bearing in mind
the importance of making widespread use of the official and working languages in all of the Union's
spheres of activity in order to permit as many Member States and Sector Members as possible to
participate more actively and effectively in the work of the Union,
considering
Resolution 103 (Minneapolis, 1998) of the Plenipotentiary Conference, laying down the principles
for use on an equal footing of the six official and working languages of the Union, while putting in
place interim limitations on the use of some languages on financial grounds,
noting
the positive experience acquired since the Plenipotentiary Conference (Nairobi, 1982) and
accelerated by Resolution 62 (Kyoto, 1994) in the progressive lifting of limitations on the use of
languages for translation of documents and interpretation of debates in the six languages of the
Union, and particularly the translation of documents for the 2000, 2001 and 2002 sessions of the
Council and World Telecommunication Development Conference 2002 in all six languages of the
Union,
D:\282224963.DOC
30.05.16
-6-
further noting
Recommendation 17 of the ITU Reform Group, that on the basis of an analysis of the first stages of
the transition to full-scale use of the six official and working languages, it should be proposed to
consider a possible time frame for such a transition with a view to taking a final decision at
Plenipotentiary Conference 2002. [1 January 2005] could be defined as a tentative date for such a
transition.
recognizing
the need to move forward in lifting the limitations on the use of languages and establishing a plan
for the transition to use of all six official and working languages on an equal footing in all of the
Union's spheres of activity,
resolves
1
as a way of moving to use of the six official languages on an equal footing, to set the date
[1 January 2005] by which all ITU work will be carried out in the six official and working
languages of the Union;
2
to abrogate Resolution 62 (Kyoto,1994) and Resolution 103 (Minneapolis, 1998) as from
[ ……].
Recommendation 20 - Improving the effectiveness of conferences and meetings
R20
WGR recommends that the experience of world radiocommunication conferences should be
emulated and a similar approach that encourages interregional consultative meetings should
be adopted for plenipotentiary conferences. In this regard, a resolution on the importance of
interregional consultative meetings like Resolution 72 (Rev.WRC-2000) for world
radiocommunication conferences should be adopted by PP-02, instructing the
Secretary-General to organize such meetings.
GEC proposals
DRAFT RESOLUTION
Regional preparations for Plenipotentiary Conferences
The Plenipotentiary Conference (Marrakech, 2002),
considering
a)
that many regional telecommunication organizations have coordinated their preparations for
this Plenipotentiary Conference;
b)
that many common proposals have been submitted to this Conference from administrations
participating in the preparations of regional telecommunication organizations;
c)
that this consolidation of views at regional level, together with the opportunity for
interregional discussions prior to the Conference, has eased the task of reaching a consensus during
the Conference;
d)
that the burden of preparation for future conferences is likely to increase;
e)
that there is consequently great benefit to the Member States of coordination of
preparations at regional level;
D:\282224963.DOC
30.05.16
-7-
f)
that the success of future conferences will depend on greater efficiency of regional
coordination and interaction at interregional level prior to future conferences;
g)
that some regional organizations lack the necessary resources to adequately organize and to
participate in such preparations;
h)
that there is a need for overall coordination of the interregional consultations,
recognizing
the benefits of regional cooperation as already experienced in the preparation of World
Radiocommunication Conferences;
recognizing further
Recommendation 20 of Working Group on ITU Reform recommending that this conference should
adopt a resolution on the importance of interregional consultative meetings instructing the
Secretary-General to organize such meetings;
taking into account
the benefits that the Plenipotentiary Conference could gain in efficiency from an increased amount
and level of preparation of the Member States prior to the Conference;
noting
a)
that many regional telecommunication organizations have expressed the need for the Union
to cooperate more closely with them;
b)
that, consequently, the Plenipotentiary Conference (Minneapolis, 1998) resolved that the
Union should develop stronger relations with regional telecommunication organizations;
further noting
that in some regions the relationship with the ITU regional offices and regional telecommunication
organizations has proved to be of great benefit;
resolves to instruct the Secretary-General
1
to consult with Member States, regional and sub-regional telecommunication organizations
on the means by which assistance can be provided in support of their preparations for future
plenipotentiary conferences,
2
on the basis of such consultations, to assist Member States, regional and sub-regional
telecommunication organizations in such areas as:
–
organization of regional and interregional informal and formal preparatory meetings;
–
organization of information sessions;
–
development of coordination methods;
–
identification of major issues to be resolved by the future Plenipotentiary conference;
3
to submit to the Council a report on the application of this Resolution,
invites Member States
to participate actively in the implementation of this Resolution.
D:\282224963.DOC
30.05.16
-8-
Recommendation 24 - Election process and procedures
R24
WGR recommends that the deadline for presenting candidates should be two weeks before
the start of the conference.
GEC proposals
The Council Working Group on Stable Election Procedures will be requested to draft necessary
amendments to the Constitution and Convention as well as to the Rules of Procedures.
Recommendation 29 - Participation of non-Council Member States and Sector
Members in Council
R29
WGR recommends that representatives from Sector Members should be given observer
status in the meetings of the Council. The advisory groups should develop criteria for the
selection of Sector Member representatives. Observers coming from Member States and
Sector Members should be given the right to participate actively in the Standing Committee
on Finance of the Council, but without the right to vote.
GEC comments
I.
•
•
•
This recommendation covers a number of issues:
the admission of Sector Members to Council sessions;
the participation of non-Council Member States and Sector Members in the work of
standing committees without the right to vote and on condition that such participation is not
to the disadvantage of Councillors;
the designation of Sector Members which could be admitted to the Council and their
number is subject to further discussion.
II.
The concept of an observer at ITU is dealt with by the Convention in the following
provisions:
•
No. 1002, which defines the term;
•
Nos. 258 to 262A on observers at plenipotentiary conferences;
•
Nos. 278 to 280 and 282 on observers at radiocommunication conferences;
•
No. 297 on observers at radiocommunication assemblies, telecommunication
standardization assemblies and telecommunication development conferences;
•
No. 60A on an observer sent to the Council by a non-Council Member State.
The conditions under which these observers are admitted to conferences and assemblies and their
rights as regards participation in the work of the conferences and assemblies are not clearly defined.
An analysis of these provisions leads to the following conclusions:
1)
The first two subparagraphs of No. 1002 state that observers for international organizations
in the United Nations system, recognized telecommunication organizations and
intergovernmental organizations operating satellite systems participate in an advisory
capacity. Since these organizations have a direct link with ITU, it is reasonable that
conferences and meetings should be able to seek their advice on subjects within their
competence. Such organizations, therefore, participate in the work of conferences and
meetings:
• to give an opinion at the request of the conference or meeting;
• without the right to vote (which can be interpreted as meaning the right to take part in
the discussions but not in the taking of decisions);
D:\282224963.DOC
30.05.16
-9-
•
2)
3)
4)
although No. 1002 does not say so, since their opinion can be asked, they ought to be
able to submit contributions.
The third subparagraph of No. 1002 authorizes a Member State to participate as an observer
in a regional conference (for a region to which it does not belong) in a non-voting capacity.
Such participation can be justified by the fact that although the Member State does not
belong to the region concerned, the conference's decisions may affect its interests. It
therefore seems logical that as a Member State it should be authorized to play a full part in
the discussions without participating in the decisions and to submit contributions (this
follows from the wording of the third subparagraph).
The fourth subparagraph refers to Sector Members without any restriction, which can be
interpreted as meaning that there are no restrictions on their observer status, whereas No. 31
of the Rules of Procedure does not seem to authorize them to participate in the debates of
committees of radiocommunication conferences and world conferences on international
telecommunications and only allows them to make statements with the authorization of the
chairman.
Under No. 60A of the Convention, Member States which are not Member States of the
Council have no right to vote or address the meeting. In other words, they are admitted to
the Council, but do not take part in its work.
The conclusion to be drawn from what has been said above is that it would be advisable to study a
possible consolidation of all the provisions relating to observers.
GEC proposals
MOD CV 60A
9bis
A Member State which is not a Member State of the Council may,
with prior notice to the Secretary-General, send one observer at its own
expense to meetings of the Council, its committees and its working groups.
Note:
CV 60A should be modified as indicated only if ADD CV 60C is adopted.
ADD
CV 60B
Sector Members may be represented as observers in meetings of the Council,
its committees and its working groups [considering financial matters], within
the conditions established by the Council and with prior notice to the
Secretary-General.
GEC comments
The GEC could not consider the consequences on the Constitution and Convention of the
conclusions that the Advisory Groups may reach concerning the criteria for selection of Sector
Member representatives.
GEC proposal
ADD
CV 60C
D:\282224963.DOC
Member State Observers and Sector Member Observers to Council shall not
have the right to vote or address the meetings of the Council. However,
Member State Observers and Sector Member Observers to Council’s
committee(s) considering financial matters shall have, within the limitations
established by the Council, the right to participate in such committee(s) without
the right to vote.
30.05.16
- 10 -
Appendix 1
INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION
GROUP OF EXPERTS TO PREPARE
FOR PP-02 ON ITU REFORM
GENEVA
—
FIRST MEETING
—
25 October 2001
(24-26 OCTOBER 2001)
FINAL LIST OF PARTICIPANTS
LISTE FINALE DES PARTICIPANTS
LISTA FINAL DE PARTICIPANTES
I.
Member States / Etats Membres / Estados Miembros
II.
Fonctionnaires élus / Elected Officials / Funcionarios Electos
III.
Secrétariat du Groupe d’experts / Secretariat of the Group of Experts /
Secretaría del Grupo de Expertos
D:\282224963.DOC
30.05.16
- 11 -
I.
Etats Membres / Member States
Estados Miembros
ARG Argentine (République) - Argentine
Republic - Argentina (República)
M. CRISTIANI Antonio Ermete
Asesor
Comisión Nacional de
Comunicaciones
103, Perú - 8º piso
1764 BUENOS AIRES
Argentine
Tél: +54 11 43479540/9555
Fax: +54 11 43479546
Email: acristiani@cnc.gov.ar
B
Brésil (République fédérative du) Brazil (Federative Republic of) Brasil (República Federativa del)
M. ALBERNAZ Joao Carlos
Head, Technical Advisory Unit
Agencia Nacional de
Telecomunicaçoes (ANATEL)
SAS - Q.06
Bloco H - 5º andar
70313-900 BRASILIA DF
Brésil
Tél: +55 61 3122065
Fax: +55 61 3122272
Email: albernaz@anatel.gov.br
CAN Canada - Canada - Canadá
Mme DORAN Janis
Senior Advisor, International Matters
Industry Canada
300, Slater Street
Room 1995D
OTTAWA Ontario K1A 0C8
Canada
Tél: +1 613 9904692
Fax: +1 613 9903158
Email: doran.janis@ic.gc.ca
D:\282224963.DOC
M. GRACIE Bruce A.
Councillor/Chair, ITU Council
Finance Committee
Industry Canada
Room 1688-D
300, Slater Street
OTTAWA Ontario K1A 0C8
Canada
Tél: +1 613 9904254
Fax: +1 613 9984530
Email: gracie.bruce@ic.gc.ca
Ms ST-ARNAUD Diane
Senior Advisor, Treaty Based
Organizations
Int'l Telecommunications Policy and
Coordination
Industry Canada
300, Slater Street
OTTAWA Ontario K1A 0C8
Canada
Tél: +1 613 9904820
Fax: +1 613 9546091
CHN Chine (République populaire de) China (People's Republic of) China (República Popular de)
Mme ZHANG Xiaolei
Deputy Director
Ministry of Information Industry
13, West Chang'an Avenue
BEIJING 100804
Chine
Tél: +86 10 66021335
Fax: +86 10 66011370
Email: xiaoleizhang@263.net
DNK Danemark - Denmark - Dinamarca
Mme KONNER Mette Jacqueline
Head, International Secretariat
National Telecom Agency
63, Holsteinsgade
DK-2100 COPENHAGEN 0
Danemark
Tél: +45 35 450135
Fax: +45 35 450017
Email: mjk@tst.dk
30.05.16
- 12 -
USA
Etats-Unis d'Amérique - United
States of America - Estados Unidos
de América
Ms ALLISON Audrey
Director,
Americas Regulatory Affairs
The Boeing Company
1200, Wilson Boulevard
ARLINGTON VA 22209
Etats-Unis
Tél: +1 703 4653215
Fax: +1 703 4653005
Email: audrey.allison@boeing.com
M. BEAIRD Richard
Senior Deputy Coordinator
Department of State
2201, C Street NW
Room 4826
WASHINGTON DC 20520
Etats-Unis
Tél: +1 202 6475832
Fax: +1 202 6475957
Email: beairdrc@state.gov
M. FISHMAN Gary
Technical Standards Director
Lucent Technologies, Inc.
Room 4D-605B
101, Crawfords Corner Road
HOLMDEL NJ 07733
Etats-Unis
Tél: +1 732 9493401
Fax: +1 732 9491196
Email: garyfishman@lucent.com
M. GLEASON Jack
Director
Office of International Policy
NTIA
Department of Commerce
14th and Constitution Avenue NW
WASHINGTON DC 20230
Etats-Unis
Tél: +1 202 4821866
Fax: +1 202 4821865
Email: jgleason@ntia.doc.gov
D:\282224963.DOC
Ms KIINGI Elizabeth
Attorney-Adviser, Office of
Legal Adviser
Economic and Business Affairs
Department of State
Room 6420
2201, C Street NW
WASHINGTON DC 20520
Etats-Unis
Tél: +1 202 6470809
Fax: +1 202 6474180
Email: kiingie@ms.state.gov
M. SCHROEDER Norbert
Program Manager, NTIA
Department of Commerce
14th and Constitution Avenue NW
Room 1609
WASHINGTON DC 20230
Etats-Unis
Tél: +1 202 4826207
Fax: +1 202 5016198
Email: nschroeder@ntia.doc.gov
Ms SHIPMAN Sally A.
Telecommunications Policy Officer
Economic and Business Affairs
Department of State
WASHINGTON DC 20520
Etats-Unis
Tél: +1 703 647 0050
Fax: +1 703 647 7407
Email: shipmansa@state.gov
Ms SPINDLER Jacqueline
Senior Attorney, International Bureau
Federal Communications
Commission
2000 M Street NW
WASHINGTON DC 20554
Etats-Unis
Tél: +1 202 4181479
Fax: +1 202 4182824
Email: jspindle@fcc.gov
30.05.16
- 13 -
F
France - France - Francia
J
Mme BEAU Marie-Odile
Chargée de mission, UIT
Secrétariat d'Etat à l'industrie
Ministère de l'économie, des finances
et de l'industrie - DIGITIP
12, rue Villiot
Le Bervil
F-75572 PARIS Cedex 12
France
Tél: +33 1 53449464
Fax: +33 1 53449002
M. ITO Masashi
Chief, International Organizations
Office
Ministry of Public Management,
Home Affairs, Posts and
Telecommunications
1-3-2, Kasumigaseki
Chiyoda-ku
TOKYO 100-8798
Japon
Tél: +81 3 35044792
Fax: +81 3 35040884
Email: t1-ito@mpt.go.jp
Email: marie-odile.beau@industrie.gouv.fr
IND
Inde (République de l') - India
(Republic of) - India (República
de la)
M. KONDO Masanori
Ministry of Public Management,
Home Affairs, Posts and
Telecommunications
2-1-2, Kasumigaseki
Chiyoda-ku
TOKYO 100-8926
Japon
Tél: +81 3 52535922
Fax: +81 3 52535925
M. BALAKRISHNAN S.
Joint Wireless Adviser to the Govt.
of India
Ministry of Communications
347, Dak Bhavan
Parliament Street
NEW DELHI 110001
Inde
Tél: +91 11 3755420
Fax: +91 11 3716111
I
Ms KOSHIISHI Miwa
International Organizations Office
Ministry of Public Management,
Home Affairs, Posts and
Telecommunications
2-1-2, Kasumigaseki
Chiyoda-ku
TOKYO 100-8926
Japon
Tél: +81 3 52535922
Fax: +81 3 52535925
Email: m.koshiishi@soumu.go.jp
Italie - Italy - Italia
M. BALDACCI Luciano
Ministero delle Comunicazioni
201, viale America
I-00144 ROMA
Italie
Tél: +39 06 54441044
Fax: +39 06 54220144
Email: lubaldacci@tin.it
M. CASCELLI Sergio
Engineer Direction Coordinator
Istituto Superiore CTI
Ministero delle Comunicazioni
201, Viale America
I-00144 ROME
Italie
Tél: +39 06 54444173
Fax: +39 06 5410904
Email: sergio.cascelli@istsupcti.it
D:\282224963.DOC
Japon - Japan - Japón
MLI
Mali (République du) - Mali
(Republic of) - Malí (República de)
M. SAMAKE Idrissa
Chargé de Mission
Société des télécommunications du
Mali (SOTELMA)
BP 740
Route de Koulikoro
BAMAKO
Mali
Tél: +223 211240/215280/218459
Fax: +223 219941/213022
30.05.16
- 14 -
MRC Maroc (Royaume du) - Morocco
(Kingdom of) - Marruecos
(Reino de)
M. BERRADA Abderrazak
Chairman of the Group of Experts to
prepare for PP-02 on ITU Reform
Mission permanente du Royaume du
Maroc
1, chemin Maurice Ravel
CH-1290 VERSOIX
Suisse
Tél: +41 22 7551505
Fax: +41 22 7556566
Email: a.berrada@ties.itu.int
POR Portugal - Portugal - Portugal
M. SILVA GOMES José A.
Senior Expert
Instituto das Comunicaçoes de
Portugal (ICP)
12, avenida José Malhoa
1099-017 LISBOA
Portugal
Tél: +351 21 7212323
Fax: +351 21 7211004
CZE
République tchèque - Czech
Republic - República Checa
M. ROUCKA Bohuslav
Expert on International Law
Czech Telecommunication Office
219, Sokolovská
PO Box 02
225 02 PRAHA 025
Rép. tchèque
Tél: +420 2 24004750
Fax: +420 2 24004811
Email: zdenek.voparil@ctu.cz
D:\282224963.DOC
RUS
Russie (Fédération de) - Russian
Federation - Rusia (Federación de)
M. KUSHTUEV Alexander
Head
Representative in Switzerland
Rostelecom
Le Chateau Banquet
94, rue de Lausanne
CH-1202 GENEVE
Suisse
Tél: +41 22 7161888
Fax: +41 22 7161889
Email: alexander.kushtuev@ties.itu.int
AFS
Sudafricaine (République) - South
Africa (Republic of) - Sudafricana
(República)
Ms PONI Ingrid
Department of Communications
Private Bag X860
PRETORIA 0001
Sudafricaine (Rép.)
Tél: +27 12 4278044
Fax: +27 12 4278102
Ms SHOPE-MAFOLE Lyndall
Minister Plenipotentiary,
Communications
Embassy of South Africa
59, Quai d'Orsay
F-75343 PARIS Cedex 07
France
Tél: +33 1 53592323/41/
+27 124278000
Fax: +33 1 53592378
Email: shope.mafole@aol.com
30.05.16
- 15 -
II.
Fonctionnaires élus / Elected Officials / Funcionarios de Elección
M. Yoshio UTSUMI, Secrétaire général
M. Roberto BLOIS, Vice-Secrétaire général
M. Robert JONES, Directeur, BR
M. Houlin ZHAO, Directeur, TSB
M. Hamadoun I. TOURÉ, Directeur, BDT
III.
Secrétariat du Groupe d’Experts
Secretariat of the Group of Experts
Secretaría del Grupo de Expertos
M. Arnaud GUILLOT, Conseiller juridique
M. Dusan SCHUSTER, Secrétaire du Groupe de travail sur la réforme de l’UIT
D:\282224963.DOC
30.05.16