System-Wide Centrally Coordinated P Power S System t O Operation ti and dC Control t l Challenges g & Future Directions CMU March 13, 2012 B. Fardanesh New York Power Authority The Ideal Control Scenario- Centrality Limits & Security Criteria System Central Controller System Topology & St t Estimator/ State E ti t / System Model Update Power System MW/MVAR Injection & Flow Control Action Area j Area k Economy and Other Objectives Model-Based Trajectory Planner/ Control Calculator Area i Measurements How Feasible? 2 Limitations: • Structural: Geographically Distributed Nature Communications • Computational Speed • Existence of Controllers Control Bandwidth Infrastructure 3 Relying l i on Margini No Coordinated C di d Active A i Steering S i Price Paid in Performance & Cost Power System State Initial State Ideal Response Time Optimum p Final State Reset Action Violations Today’s Response Instability 4 Solution- A Way Out • Can still exert Centrality and Coordinated Control via Hierarchical (Multi-Level) Control • Offers a Divide and Conquer Capability • Complex l in i its i True Form 5 Hierarchical (Multi-Level) Control Structure System-Wide Controller/Coordinator Area Central Controller Area Central Controller Area Central Controller Power Flow Information/Signal Flow Cluster Controller Cluster Controller 6 The Main Premise: Minimization of operating margins or maximum utilization of existing transmission assets with heavier reliance on traditional as well as new control equipment, equipment taking full advantage of high-bandwidth integrated and centrally-coordinated ll di d controll off power injections and flows, with increased system security and reliability. 7 Power System Operating Limits • Transient and Small-Signal Stability • Voltage V lt Stability St bilit • Thermal 8 Maximum Thermal Limit Voltage Limit Id dentify T True Limits---Shrrink Marg gins While m meeting R Reliabilitty criteriia Uncertainty in Computed Limits On-Line (Dynamic) Rating Inexpensive Limit Enhancer/Remover On-Line Fast Security Assessment Increased Confidence in Models Small Signal Limit Actual Operating Limit Uncertain Limits System-Wide Automatic Coordination Intelligent Tools to Advise Operators Crisp Limits 9 P Power S System Control C l Mechanisms M h i • Injection I j i (Shunt) (Sh ) Controllers C ll – Generator/AVR/PSS; Fixed Shunt Capacitors/Reactors(no fine control); Shunt FACTS Devices • Routing (Series) Controllers – Fixed Series Capacitors/Reactors(no fine control) ; Phase-Shifters, Tap Changing Under Load Transformers (step-wise (step wise slow control); Series FACTS Devices 10 Centralized Coordination • A simpler form of Hierarchical Control: Centralized Set-Point Coordination • Separate p P and Q - Further Decomposition p • System-wide Automatic (Closed-Loop) Real Power Control Existing for Years • System-wide Closed-Loop Reactive Power Control Not Quite Yet! Control--Not • Sacrifices Made: Degraded Performance g Margin g Requirements q Large 11 To Reduce Margins System-Wide Automatic (Closed-Loop) Control/Coordination for Real/Reactive Injection &Flow Computational Speed and Algorithms 12 M ki a C Making Case ffor Additional Additi l andd Faster F t Coordinated Controls: Then we will have to: Squeeze S more off the th existing i ti margins i on th the power system Expand the transmission capability via compensation both fixed and variable Build only in new or existing substations and/or underground to deal with NIMBY or BNANA Rely on additional and Faster Coordinated Controls Operating with Less Margin Means More Reliance on Controls 13 Compensation and Control Solutions • Usually a Hybrid of Switched Fixed and Vernier Control Controller Requirements: • Reliability/Redundancy • Adaptability • Flexibility Voltage-Sourced Converter (VSC) Based Controllers offer such Potential 14 S t System-wide id Automatic A t ti Power P Control C t l ( (SAPC) ) • Centrally-Coordinated Hierarchical Real Power Control Co o too achieve ac eve Maximum a u Utilization U a o closer c ose too Thermal Capacity of Transmission System - Stabilization - Frequency Control - Coordinated di d MW Injection j i andd Flow l Controll - Phase-Angle Equalization and Reduction across the system y) the need for Transmission - Reduce ((Delay) Expansion 15 S t System-wide id Automatic A t ti Voltage V lt Control C t l ( (SAVC) ) • Centrally-Coordinated Hierarchical Voltage C Control l to achieve: hi - Voltage Stability - Voltage Profile Control - Coordinated MVAr Injection and Flow Control - Maximum Distance to Voltage Collapse - Reduced or Minimized Losses 16 What is Needed? Hardware: Fast-acting MW/MVAr injection/absorption and flow controllers t ll including i l di fast-dynamics f td i generators t and/or d/ energy storage devices Adequate highly reliable less expensive VSC VSC-based based controllers Abundant highly reliable high-bandwidth communication networks EHV level solid-state or power electronics based breakers to for increased stability System-wide synchronous measurements for robust and fast state and pparameter feedback 17 What is Needed? Algorithms and Faster Computing: Criteria for selection of feedback quantities for coordinated closed-loop power injection/flow control Determination of appropriate response rates of closed control loops Robust, adaptive, high-bandwidth control algorithms for largescale structurally decentralized dynamic systems Faster computation capability to approach real-time optimization, coordination and control Proven robust hierarchical control algorithms to overcome the limitations in achieving wide-area integrated centralized controller performance System/equipment model identification and validation tools Faster algorithms for system topology and state estimation Parallel ll l algorithms l i h andd faster f computers 18 System Voltage and Current Phasors from all IEDs (Relays, DFRs, PMUs, Metering, SCADA, RTUs and PQ Monitors) System Topology (Breaker Status) Super Ca b a o Calibrator Database – CIM; Data Correlation; Analysis, Archive Other Measurements Temperatures (equipment and ambient), Pressures, Sags, Dissolved gas in oil, Mechanical (vibration, air-gap, etc.), Leakage currents, Battery Monitors, PT, CT conditions, etc. Other Substations or Generating Stations ... Alarms A th i d Authorized LAN/WAN Access Secure Power LAN (Redundant) Real-Time Filtered, Certified Data Secure Communications Backbone From other stations’ Super Calibrator Operations/Control Center -- EMS Visualization Vi li ti State Estimation/State Solution/Dynamic State Solution Automatic Feedback Topology/Parameter Estimation and Identification Model Identification/Enhancement Voltage/MVAr Coordination; loss minimization SPS/RAS Enable/Disable Stability Monitoring and Control Fault/Outage Management Contingency Analysis/Security Response Adequacy Measurement and Monitoring Power Quality Monitoring/Enhancement Resource Adequacy, q y Resource Commitment, Scheduling, Markets Advice to the System Operator Automatic Feedback to Other Stations Alarms Inteelligent Use off Sensinng and C Commuunications A Futuure Archhitecturre for Poower Syystems Operrations and Coontrol Substation or Generating Station Direct Non-Iterative State Estimation: A New Paradigm 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 97 26 13.5 90 10 0 0 85 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 529 50 64.5 0 0 0 60 156 337 17 0 10 7.5 6 0 0 85 0 12 0 0 321 10 118 15 1 0 1.5 0 5 175 0 0 20 0 0 0 26 26 385 9.5 0 0.5 117 0 10 0 48 0 1 1 23.5 0 100 0 586 0 3 0 5 1 0 4 0 5 351 25 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 97 26 13.5 90 10 0 0 85 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 50 529 64.5 0 0 0 337 0 7.5 0 85 0 17 321 10 118 9.5 0 10 15 1 0 0 10 6 1.5 0 5 0 1 0 175 0 0 0 100 0 20 0 0 5 0 30 0 3 0 1 4 0.5 15 0.75 9.75 0 0 0 25 0 1700 5 17 0 1 117 0 0 10 26 0.5 0 0 0 1 5 385 117 48 23.5 586 351 25 55 2120 95 40 1170 382 50 61 101 60 31 500 300 35 15 1.5 1.5 1 5 3 0 5 5 60 0.5 10 1 0 0 9.5 95 10 0.5 5 1 0 11700 0 0 100 0 0 12 0 0 1.5 1 17 0 14.25 1989 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 t6 0 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 2465 0 5 t10 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 60 156 12 0 0 0 26 1 2849 0 60 337 0 7.5 0 85 0 29 5 0 3042 430 11893 850 0 26 26 385 55 2600 26 529 0 61 101 60 31 15 1 1.5 1.5 5 60 5 0.5 0 1.5 12 0 115 25 50 0 9.5 0 0.5 117 2120 0 0 10 1 0 1 48 23.5 95 40 85 0 11700 0 0 5 12 1 17 0 0 5 0 100 0 5 0 0.5 1.5 10 1 14.25 1989 1 60 156 12 0 0 0 26 337 17 321 10 118 9.5 0 0 10 15 1 0 0 10 26 0.5 0 385 117 48 55 2120 95 61 101 60 15 1 1.5 5 60 5 12 0 0 7.5 6 1.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 175 0 0 0 100 85 0 20 0 0 5 0 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 t6 0 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 0 5 t10 2465 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 14.25 1989 1 0 30 0.5 0 25 15 1700 0 0 0.75 17 3 5 9.75 1 0 0 1 0 117 0 4 0 0 10 1 0 0 5 23.5 586 351 25 40 1170 382 50 31 500 300 35 1.5 5 3 0 0.5 10 1 0 1.5 1 17 0 117 0 1 0 95 10 0.5 0 30 0.5 0 25 20 0 15 1700 0 0 3 0.75 17 5 0 0 9.75 1 0 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 26 97 13.5 90 10 0 85 0 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 529 50 64.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 9.5 50 35 0 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 5 1 0 117 0 0 t6 0 0 0 10 3 t7 0 100 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 3 t8 0 1 0 0 15 t9 2210 586 351 25 9.5 1170 382 50 95 11700 0 5 t10 2465 500 300 35 10 0 50 3 t11 754 5 3 0 0.5 0 0 0 t12 130 10 1 0 5 100 0 0 t13 145 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 t14 0 0 0 260 156 17 10 6 0 1667 120 12 321 15 1.5 175 0 0 97 26 0 10 1 10 0 0 118 0 5 0 1700 17 1 382 300 3 • A direct one-shot solution for the state of a power system is i now possible ibl • Full AC solution • No more iterations • No reliance on the “goodness” of the initial guess g • An envisioned faster more robust solution 241.5 64 163.5 13.5 90 0 0 0 162 .5 1125 231 8 64.5 0 15 0.75 9.75 55 2120 95 40 1170 500 61 101 60 31 1 5 15 1.5 1.5 60 0 0 9.5 95 10 0.5 5 0 1 0 11700 0 0 100 0 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 0 t6 0 10 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 0 5 t10 2465 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 0 14.25 1989 1 30 0.5 0 25 0 5 0 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 97 26 13.5 90 10 0 0 85 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 529 50 64.5 0 0 0 A Simple Example 60 156 337 17 0 10 7.5 6 0 0 85 0 12 0 0 321 10 118 15 1 0 1.5 0 5 175 0 0 20 0 0 0 26 26 385 9.5 0 0.5 117 0 10 0 48 0 1 1 23.5 0 100 0 586 0 3 0 5 1 0 4 0 5 351 25 15 0.75 9.75 1700 17 1 0 0 0 9.5 117 0 1 0 55 2120 95 40 1170 500 61 101 60 31 1 5 15 1.5 1.5 382 300 3 50 35 0 95 10 0.5 11700 0 0 5 12 1 17 0 0 5 0 100 0 60 0 5 0 0.5 1.5 10 1 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 0 t6 0 10 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 0 5 t10 2465 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 0 14.25 1989 1 30 0.5 0 25 0 5 0 • Redundant Polynomial Equations x1 2 x1 x 2 x 3 2 241.5 64 163.5 13.5 90 0 0 0 162 .5 1125 231 8 64.5 0 2 x2 x3 x2 2849 2 0 60 337 0 7.5 x2 2 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 5 1 0 117 0 0 t6 0 0 0 10 3 t7 0 100 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 3 t8 0 1 0 0 15 t9 2210 586 351 25 9.5 1170 382 50 95 11700 0 5 t10 2465 500 300 35 10 0 50 3 t11 754 5 3 0 0.5 0 0 0 t12 130 10 1 0 5 100 0 0 t13 145 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 t14 0 0 85 0 2 x1 0 260 156 17 10 6 0 1667 120 12 321 15 1.5 175 0 0 97 26 0 10 1 10 0 0 118 0 5 0 0 85 0 29 5 0 3042 430 11893 850 0 26 26 385 55 9.5 0 0.5 117 2120 2600 26 529 0 61 101 60 31 15 1 1.5 1.5 5 60 5 0.5 0 1.5 12 0 0 0 10 1 0 1 48 23.5 95 40 14.25 1989 1 7 x1 x1 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 97 26 13.5 90 10 0 0 85 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 50 529 64.5 0 0 0 60 337 0 7.5 0 85 2 0 2 x2 x3 x3 2 x2 14.25 1989 2 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 t6 0 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 2465 0 5 t10 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 1 10 0 30 0.5 0 25 20 0 15 1700 0 0 3 0.75 17 5 0 0 9.75 1 0 5 x1 x 3 x1 x 2 3 x 3 x 2 115 25 50 0 8 2 2 26 5 x 3 11 5 x 2 x 3 12 x 1 13 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 26 97 13.5 90 10 0 85 0 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 529 50 64.5 0 0 0 60 156 12 0 0 0 26 337 17 321 10 118 9.5 0 0 10 15 1 0 0 10 7.5 6 1.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 175 0 0 0 100 85 0 20 0 0 5 0 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 t6 0 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 0 5 t10 2465 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 14.25 1989 1 0 30 0.5 0 25 15 1700 0 0 0.75 17 3 5 9.75 1 0 0 1 0 117 0 4 0 0 10 • Dual Transformation and Direct One-Shot Solution 30 0 3 0 1 4 0.5 15 0.75 9.75 0 0 0 25 0 1700 5 17 0 1 117 0 0 10 26 0.5 0 0 0 1 5 385 117 48 23.5 586 351 25 55 2120 95 40 1170 382 50 61 101 60 31 500 300 35 15 1.5 1.5 1 5 3 0 5 5 60 0.5 10 1 0 0 9.5 95 10 0.5 5 1 0 11700 0 0 100 0 0 156 12 0 0 0 26 12 17 321 10 118 9.5 0 0 10 15 1 0 0 10 0 6 1.5 0 5 0 1 1.5 0 175 0 0 0 100 1 0 20 0 0 5 0 17 0 26 0.5 0 385 117 48 55 2120 95 61 101 60 15 1 1.5 5 60 5 12 0 0 1 0 0 5 23.5 586 351 25 40 1170 382 50 31 500 300 35 1.5 5 3 0 0.5 10 1 0 1.5 1 17 0 0 9.5 95 10 0.5 5 0 1 0 11700 0 0 100 0 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 97 26 13.5 90 10 0 0 85 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 529 50 64.5 0 0 0 60 156 337 17 0 10 7.5 6 0 0 85 0 12 0 0 321 10 118 15 1 0 1.5 0 5 175 0 0 20 0 0 0 26 26 385 9.5 0 0.5 117 0 10 0 48 0 1 1 23.5 0 100 0 586 0 3 0 15 0.75 9.75 1700 17 1 0 0 0 9.5 117 0 1 0 A Power System State Estimator/Solver 5 1 0 4 0 5 351 25 55 2120 95 40 1170 500 61 101 60 31 1 5 15 1.5 1.5 382 300 3 50 35 0 95 10 0.5 11700 0 0 5 12 1 17 0 0 5 0 100 0 60 0 5 0 0.5 1.5 10 1 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 0 t6 0 10 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 0 5 t10 2465 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 0 14.25 1989 1 30 0.5 0 25 0 5 0 • Bus power injection equations in Rectangular from • Naturally in the desired form: Vi 241.5 64 163.5 13.5 90 0 0 0 162 .5 1125 231 8 64.5 0 =ai + jbi 2849 0 60 337 0 7.5 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 5 1 0 117 0 0 t6 0 0 0 10 3 t7 0 100 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 3 t8 0 1 0 0 15 t9 2210 586 351 25 9.5 1170 382 50 95 11700 0 5 t10 2465 500 300 35 10 0 50 3 t11 754 5 3 0 0.5 0 0 0 t12 130 10 1 0 5 100 0 0 t13 145 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 t14 0 0 0 260 156 17 10 6 0 1667 120 12 321 15 1.5 175 0 0 97 26 0 10 1 10 0 0 118 0 5 0 0 85 0 29 5 0 3042 430 11893 850 0 26 26 385 55 9.5 0 0.5 117 2120 2600 26 529 0 61 101 60 31 15 1 1.5 1.5 5 60 5 0.5 0 1.5 12 0 0 0 10 1 0 1 48 23.5 95 40 85 0 14.25 1989 1 0 30 0.5 0 25 20 0 15 1700 0 0 3 0.75 17 5 0 0 9.75 1 0 ReY . a a b b ImY . a b N ij i l j i j i 115 25 50 0 ij i j a jbi PG j PD j ReYij . a j ai aibj ImYij . ai a j bjbi QG j QD j j 2,N N i l 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 97 26 13.5 90 10 0 0 85 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 50 529 64.5 0 0 0 337 0 7.5 0 85 0 17 321 10 118 9.5 0 10 15 1 0 0 10 6 1.5 0 5 0 1 0 175 0 0 0 100 0 20 0 0 5 0 30 0 3 0 1 4 0.5 15 0.75 9.75 0 0 0 25 0 1700 5 17 0 1 117 0 0 10 26 0.5 0 0 0 1 5 385 117 48 23.5 586 351 25 55 2120 95 40 1170 382 50 61 101 60 31 500 300 35 15 1.5 1.5 1 5 3 0 5 5 60 0.5 10 1 0 0 9.5 95 10 0.5 5 1 0 11700 0 0 100 0 0 12 14.25 1989 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 t6 0 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 2465 0 5 t10 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 60 156 12 0 0 0 26 1 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 26 97 13.5 90 10 0 85 0 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 529 50 64.5 0 0 0 60 156 12 0 0 0 26 337 17 321 10 118 9.5 0 0 10 15 1 0 0 10 7.5 6 1.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 175 0 0 0 100 85 0 20 0 0 5 0 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 t6 0 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 0 5 t10 2465 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 14.25 1989 1 0 30 0.5 0 25 15 1700 0 0 0.75 17 3 5 9.75 1 0 0 1 0 117 0 4 0 0 10 • Other Measurement equations have similar form 0 0 1.5 1 17 0 26 0.5 0 385 117 48 55 2120 95 61 101 60 15 1 1.5 5 60 5 12 0 0 1 0 0 5 23.5 586 351 25 40 1170 382 50 31 500 300 35 1.5 5 3 0 0.5 10 1 0 1.5 1 17 0 0 9.5 95 10 0.5 5 0 1 0 11700 0 0 100 0 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 97 26 13.5 90 10 0 0 85 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 529 50 64.5 0 0 0 Envisioned Benefits • • • • 60 156 337 17 0 10 7.5 6 0 0 85 0 12 0 0 321 10 118 15 1 0 1.5 0 5 175 0 0 20 0 0 0 26 26 385 9.5 0 0.5 117 0 10 0 48 0 1 1 23.5 0 100 0 586 0 3 0 5 1 0 4 0 5 351 25 15 0.75 9.75 1700 17 1 0 0 0 9.5 117 0 1 0 55 2120 95 40 1170 500 61 101 60 31 1 5 15 1.5 1.5 382 300 3 50 35 0 95 10 0.5 11700 0 0 5 12 1 17 0 0 5 0 100 0 60 0 5 0 0.5 1.5 10 1 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 0 t6 0 10 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 0 5 t10 2465 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 0 14.25 1989 1 30 0.5 0 25 0 5 0 Direct State Estimation More robust– No more iterations N reliance No li on the h initial i i i l guess Faster– Perhaps p limited onlyy byy the communication links’ latency • A much more “dynamic” dynamic assessment of the system conditions and behavior • Potential for ultimate use in closed-loop closed loop and automatic control of power systems 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 97 26 13.5 90 10 0 0 85 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 50 529 64.5 0 0 0 241.5 64 163.5 13.5 90 0 0 0 162 .5 1125 231 8 64.5 0 337 0 7.5 0 85 0 17 321 10 118 9.5 0 10 15 1 0 0 10 6 1.5 0 5 0 1 0 175 0 0 0 100 0 20 0 0 5 0 30 0 3 0 1 4 0.5 15 0.75 9.75 0 0 0 25 0 1700 5 17 0 1 117 0 0 10 26 0.5 0 0 0 1 5 385 117 48 23.5 586 351 25 55 2120 95 40 1170 382 50 61 101 60 31 500 300 35 15 1.5 1.5 1 5 3 0 5 5 60 0.5 10 1 0 0 9.5 95 10 0.5 5 1 0 11700 0 0 100 0 0 12 0 0 1.5 1 17 0 14.25 1989 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 t6 0 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 2465 0 5 t10 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 60 156 12 0 0 0 26 1 2849 0 60 337 0 7.5 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 5 1 0 117 0 0 t6 0 0 0 10 3 t7 0 100 0 4 0 0 5 0 0 3 t8 0 1 0 0 15 t9 2210 586 351 25 9.5 1170 382 50 95 11700 0 5 t10 2465 500 300 35 10 0 50 3 t11 754 5 3 0 0.5 0 0 0 t12 130 10 1 0 5 100 0 0 t13 145 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 t14 0 0 0 260 156 17 10 6 0 1667 120 12 321 15 1.5 175 0 0 97 26 0 10 1 10 0 0 118 0 5 0 0 85 0 29 5 0 3042 430 11893 850 0 26 26 385 55 2600 26 529 0 61 101 60 31 15 1 1.5 1.5 5 60 5 0.5 0 1.5 12 0 115 25 50 0 9.5 0 0.5 117 2120 0 0 10 1 0 1 48 23.5 95 40 85 0 14.25 1989 1 0 30 0.5 0 25 20 0 15 1700 0 0 3 0.75 17 5 0 0 9.75 1 0 0 241.5 2849 64 0 260 163.5 1667 120 26 97 13.5 90 10 0 85 0 0 0 0 29 5 0 0 162 3042 430 1125.5 11893 850 2600 115 231 8 26 25 529 50 64.5 0 0 0 60 156 12 0 0 0 26 337 17 321 10 118 9.5 0 0 10 15 1 0 0 10 26 0.5 0 385 117 48 55 2120 95 61 101 60 15 1 1.5 5 60 5 12 0 0 7.5 6 1.5 0 5 0 1 0 0 175 0 0 0 100 85 0 20 0 0 5 0 0 t1 1020 9 t2 676 0 t3 348 0 t4 60 0 t5 25 0 t6 0 3 t7 0 0 3 t8 0 0 15 t9 2210 0 5 t10 2465 50 3 t11 754 0 0 t12 130 0 0 t13 145 0 0 t14 0 14.25 1989 1 0 30 0.5 0 25 15 1700 0 0 0.75 17 3 5 9.75 1 0 0 1 0 117 0 4 0 0 10 1 0 0 5 23.5 586 351 25 40 1170 382 50 31 500 300 35 1.5 5 3 0 0.5 10 1 0 1.5 1 17 0 0 9.5 95 10 0.5 5 0 1 0 11700 0 0 100 0 A Historic Perspective 100+ Years Set-Point Coordinated Automatic uo c Single Machine MW Injection Control Single Load 1880s Set-Point Coordinated Automatic MVAR Injection Control Set-Point Coordinated Automatic (Closed Loop) High-Bandwidth MW/MVAr Injection/Flow Control; SAPC, SAVC, SAC Ideal Control Performance Year 2000 24