Demystifying Electric Energy Systems Dynamics, Modeling and Control Masoud Nazari, Le Xie, Anupam Thatte Advisor: Prof. Marija Ilic March 11, 2009 1 Nature of long-term Power System Oscillations • During system-wide electro-mechanical oscillations, the swing energy flows through the power lines back and forth between the rotating masses of the different generators with a frequency of typically 0.1-1 Hz. • In the case of insufficient damping, small disturbances may trigger growing oscillations, that lead to loss of synchronization between groups of generators and possibly blackouts. • Two types of slow oscillations: – Local – Interarea 2 Real world example of inter-area oscillation form Portugal distribution network • Each area has synchronous machines and wind farms • There is an electromechanical mode of oscillatory between two areas • To resolve the problem Power System stabilizer is implemented • Understanding the nature of inter-area oscillation in power systems is not an easy task 3 Outline • Understanding interactions (inter-area dynamics) in power systems by drawing analogies with mechanical systems and electrical circuits – Mechanical systems • Two mass spring system (Interconnected system) – Electrical circuits • Two RLC circuits – Governor control of synchronous generators for frequency control – Excitation control of electromagnetic dynamics for voltage/reactive power support [Working Paper] 4 Mechanical Systems Two-Mass-Spring System 5 Double Mass Spring System (damping) f1=‐x2 k1 m1 (displacement) x1 (speed) x2 (damping) f2=‐x4 k2 m2 m1 = m2 =m k1 = k2 =k (displacement) x3 (speed) x4 6 Possible System Decomposition The whole system can be represented as: 0 0 1 0 x˙1 x1 x 3 S1 : = k1 + k 2 + + f k 1 2 − 0 0 ˙ x x x 2 2 4 m1 m1 0 0 1 0 x˙ 3 x 3 x1 S2 : = k 2 + k2 + f2 0 x 4 0 x 2 x˙ 4 − m2 m2 D D f1 = − 1 x 2 f 2 = − 2 x4 m1 m2 7 Time-domain Response of the Coupled System (Smaller friction f = -0.1x2 m1= m2 = 1, k1 = 0.001, k2 = 1) 8 Non-standard Singularly Perturbed Form Intepretation k1 = ε = 0.001 Couples system S takes on the form € εX˙ = A(ε)X Rank(A(0)) = 3 That is, in this case λ( A(0)) = {−0.05 + 4.44i, − 0.05 − 4.44i, 0, - 0.1} € € 9 Electrical Circuit Analogy to Mass-Spring System 10 Analogous Systems Mechanical Quantity Electrical System Analogue Displacement, x Charge, Q Velocity, v Current, I Force, F Voltage, e Friction, D Resistance, R Spring Constant, K Inverse of Capacitance, 1/C Mass, M Inductance, L Potential Energy in Spring, (Kx2)/ Energy stored by Capacitor, Q2/ 2 (2C) Kinetic Energy in Mass, (Mv2)/2 Energy in Inductor, (Li2)/2 11 Double LC, with resistance f1=‐x2 k1 f2=‐x4 m1 (displacement) x1 (speed) x2 k2 m2 (displacement) x3 (speed) x4 12 Possible System Decomposition The whole system can be represented as: 0 1 x˙1 x1 S1 : = 1 − 0 ˙ x x 2 2 L1C1 0 x˙ 3 S1 : = 1 1 1 x˙ 4 − + C2 L1 L2 0 + 1 L1C2 1 x 3 + 0 x 4 0 x 3 + f1 0 x 4 0 1 L1C1 0 x1 + f2 0 x 2 R1 f1 = − x 2 L1 R1 R2 R2 f2 = − x4 + − x2 L2 L1 L2 13 Time-domain Responses of Coupled S1 and S2 • L1=1; C1=1000; R1=1; L2=1; C2=1; R2=1 14 Non-standard Singularly Perturbed Form Intepretation 1 = ε = 0.001 C1 Couples system takes on the form € εX˙ = A(ε)X Rank(A(0)) = 3 That is, in this case € λ( A(0)) = {0, − 0.5 + 1.32i, − 0.5 −1.32i, − 0.9995} 15 € Governor Control of Synchronous Machines Analogy to Mass-Spring 16 Dynamic Model of Two Machines Infinite bus Reference Bus Machine 1 X1 Machine 2 X2 17 Decoupled model Power flow: 0 0 1 0 δ˙G1 δG1 δG 2 S1 : = x1 + x 2 + 1 − 0 0 ωG1 ωG 2 ω˙ G1 M x x M1 x 2 1 1 2 0 0 1 0 δ˙ δG 2 δG1 G2 S2 : = 1 K2 + 1 − − 0 ω ˙ G 2 ωG1 ωG 2 M x M 2 x 2 M 2 2 2 K K f1 = − 1 ωG1 f 2 = − 2 ωG 2 M1 M2 18 Time-domain Response of the Coupled System • M1=1; K1=1; X1=100; M2=10; K2=1; X2=1 • Slow inter-area oscillation (singular characteristic of system matrix) 19 Concluding remarks • Understanding analogies between: (1) mechanical systems and electrical circuits; and, (2) electric power systems, is a good way to introduce power systems problems (2) to those familiar with (1) [WP…]; • In this presentation we illustrated how can one interpret slow inter-area dynamics in power systems by understanding simpler systems (1). • We are preparing an extensive paper on these analogies; 20