Version:
Page:
Issue Date:
01
1 of 2
21 May 1995
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Employee Name:
No.
Gary Greatex
OBJECTIVE
3
4
Fires Assay Foreman
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
Maintain sample turnaround time.
90% samples reported within stated
turnaround. Monitored through LIMS, InfoLab.
Minimise the number of repeat samples run due
to quality control not meeting acceptance
criteria.
Total sample repeats to be less than 2% - this
will be tracked through the LIMS, InfoLab.
Quality control to be evaluated on all sample
batches before reporting client results.
Control charts to be evaluated and any CRM,
in-house standard, replicate or blank not
meeting
acceptance
criteria
to
be
investigated.
Maintain Fire Assay Group accreditation with
NATA.
Continued
conditions.
Ensure that consumables arrive “just in time”
with minimal stocks held on the premises.
Monitor “stock outs”.
1
2
Position:
accreditation
with
minimal
5
6
Both the employee and the manager need to sign off agreed objectives:
Employee's signature:
Line manager’s signature:
Gary Greatex
Date: 4/3/2001
Iva Gonow
Date: 4/3/2001
05-006
Version:
Page:
Issue Date:
01
2 of 2
21 May 1995
EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE REVIEW
Employee Name:
Review period:
Objective
1
2
3
4
5
Gary Greatex
April 2001
Position:
to
Fire Assay Foreman
April 2002
Comment
Rating
80% samples were reported within the stated turnaround time, some staffing problems
during evaluation period, time management issues also highlighted.
Approximately 3.5% samples were processed as repeats because of poor quality control
performance.
No major quality control problems reported to supervisor.
No NATA re-assessment during the review period.
Minimal stock outs. Stocks held on hand meet laboratory requirements.
1
1
2
2
2
Rating system: 1 = below expectations, 2 = meets expectations, 3 = exceeds expectations.
Development plan
1
2
Sample turnaround times must improve. Some staffing problems during evaluation period. Gary
to attend time management training.
Gary needs to conduct on-the-job training for some fire assay staff. Gary to be given some
assistance with training if required.
Employee's comments:
Staff turnover has been high during evaluation period and with large contracts new staff has not been able
to keep up with demands. Equipment failures have lead to lower sample throughputs. Lack of enough
cupellation furnaces has lead to sample backlogs. The Fire Assay Section is also under-staffed.
Line manager’s comments:
Gary should be able to keep up with sample throughput with the staff and equipment he has in the section
if his time management issues were resolved.
Senior management’s
comments:
Senior management to counsel Gary on time management issues. Need to resolve quality control problems
within the section.
Employee's signature:
Line manager’s signature:
Director or Laboratory Manager
Gary Greatex
Date:
4/3/2002
Iva Gonow
Date:
4/3/2002
Len Mazzorello
Date:
6/3/2002
05-006