PRACTICAL PROJECT PROJECT REPORT Written report The report is basically a large version of a normal report, with some extra sections. The size of the report should reflect the fact that you have spent the equivalent of around 10 normal practical sessions doing the project work. The required sections are: Executive summary – a summary of what you did and what you found [½ page] Table of Contents – listing each section and the start page number Introduction – essentially summarises what information you had before you started your practical work, i.e. what you found about other people’s work in the topic area; explain what is important about the analyte(s) [1-2 pages] Procedure – the final version of the method(s) you used, written step-by-step with enough detail for someone else to repeat your work Results – transcribed into neat tables (raw data to be attached in appendix) Calculations – start with a table of summarising what positive results you got; do not include full calculations for replicates; show with one fully detailed calculation of each type (including the recovery check) that you know what you are doing, and simply give the final answers for the other replicates Discussion – what you had to do to get things to work (or not work); why things didn’t work; how your results compared to any known values; what you would do differently or additionally if you had more time [minimum 2 pages] References – see your Sci. Info Skills notes about the correct way to reference your work; this is not just a list of books in the library or websites: each reference must be linked to the introduction and discussion section Appendix – your time/reagent/equipment use logs; raw data; daily record sheets The suggested page lengths provided for some sections should not be treated as maximum lengths (except the Exec. Summary). If you need to write more, do so, but don’t waffle. There is a simple way to distinguish between what belongs in the Introduction and Discussion. You should treat the Introduction as though you wrote it before you began the practical work, so nothing that relates to your results should go in it. The Discussion is where your work belongs, but you can still use other people’s work there also. It is compulsory to write your report on computer. The Appendix does not need to be converted to digital form – you may submit the report in hardcopy or electronically. The report is to be handed in after you make your presentation to the class. It will be assessed on the following: content – what you actually write, including the calculations and especially the Discussion organisation – how well it meets the above requirements presentation – marks will be deducted for poor, inappropriate or inconsistent formatting Powerpoint presentation This MUST be submitted to Adam by NOON on the day before the presentation session. If you do not meet this deadline, you will not be allowed to present your report, and hence will not be able to pass the subject (no exceptions). It will be loaded onto the computer (with data projector) in the room where the presentations are held. There will be some samples of good and bad presentations provided on the subject webpage which should be considered along with the following things to avoid: irrelevant graphics distracting backgrounds/transitions/animations/sounds the full procedure raw data small text exotic, illegible fonts It is recommended that a projected slide show employs a light background (dark text). Make sure you test your PPt before submitting it. It can be emailed or brought on USB drive. Verbal presentation The last session in Term 4 will be set aside for your presentations. Date: November 26 starting at 9.30 am in E2.8 (be there by 9.20 am) You should aim at 10-15 minutes. While this sounds a lot, it isn’t really. It should cover everything in the written report, but in an abbreviated way. The order of presentation will be determined by a random drawing of numbers. Anyone arriving late will go last (the worst position). Do: try to speak to the class, rather than just read outline what methods were used explain the importance of the analyte(s) show a table and/or graph of the results (not data) that were obtained calibration graphs are OK to demonstrate linearity (or lack of), but are not essential explain what went wrong and right and why Don’t: read your written report – prepare a separate speech version overwhelm with detail (especially data and procedural)