POIlM CONPJ!)llNTIAL llllPORT OP fOr

advertisement
POIlM OP CONPJ!)llNTIAL llllPORT
[See Rule 4 of the All-India Services (COnfidential Rules) Rules, 1970)
~pon
fOr the year/period O:oding.
PART-i-PERSONAL DATA
Name of the officer
2.
Name of the service to \\hich the Officer belongs
3.
Date of birth
4,
Date of cOntinuOuS appointment to tbe present
grade
5,
Present post held and the date of appomtment
theretC'
6,
PeriOd of ab:.encc from duty on leave, training ek.
during lhe year
PART·I1-ASSESSMENT llV THE REPORTING AUTHORITY
State of Healtb
2,
General Assessment
(This should eontam an overall assesmcnt of the
Officers personality, his gOod qualities anJ shOrlCOmings and should in partiCUlarS touch On the
following points viz, quality of mind (originalit)'
and comprehension). knowledge of work, power of
expression (on paper and in discussion). power of
acquiring general informatiOn, attention to detail,
industrY and consciousness. judgment, speed
of disposal, willingness to accept responsibility and
takc deCisions, relatjon with subordinates and
Colleagues. public relations and in addition, in
case of lndinn Administrative Service and Indian
POlice Scrvice Officer onlY, communal harmony ~Ild
w~lfare of the Scheduled Castes and the Schedu~ed
Tribes, in caSe they were dealing wilh them, and ,m
Case of Indian Forest Service OfficerS only. life
conservation and social forestry,
If the Officer has been rePrimanded far indifferf'nt
WOrk Or fOr other causes during the pcriod under
review brief ParticularS shouJd be given, if the
Officer has done any OutStanding notablc work
meriting commendation brief mention should be
made].
3
Integrity
(Se~ note 1 belo\\ the form)
Signature of thC ReportUlg Authority , , ' , , .
Name in Rlock letters,
Designation
Dille. ."
•
PART.!I1-REMARKS OF THE REVIEWING AUTHORITY
Lengtb of Sorvice under Reviewing AuthoritY
2.
Do you agree Or d isagrce With the :assessment of the
officer given by tho RepOrting Authority? Is there
anything you wisb to modify or add?
3,
General remarks with specific COmments about the
4.
(a) FilncS5 for promotion to higher grade{s) jn his
turn
Fit
<ii)
Not yet fil
(iii)
Unfit
(b) Has the officer any special Characteristics,
and/ or onr outstanding merits or abilities which
would jus!lfy his advancement and srcilll selection
for higher appointment oUt of turn . If yes, please
mention these chamcteflstics briefly.
(c) Recommendation regarding suitability for other
sph eres of work
Signature of the Reviewing Authority , .. ' " . .,.
Name in Block letters ....
Designation ..... .
Date .... , .. . , .................. , ..... , ....... .
PART-lV-REMARKS OF THE ACCEPTING AUTHORITY
(i.
e. next Superior Officer)
Signature of the AcceptinG Authority .. , ..... . . .
Name in Block letters ................ , .... ... . ,
Designation .. . ' . ..
Date ........ . ....... ... .. ... ...... ....... ... . .
NOTE.- I. Wherein an adVerse cni:y is mad~ , ,",herher it rehl.tes to a remediable or to an irremediable defect, ;1
should be communicated, but while doing so, thO substanc..: of the entirt: report including what nlay
have been said ill praise cf the Oftker reported upOn should be communicated.
NOTE.- 2, The following procedure should be fc, lJo,",ed in filling up the column relatmg to integrity: (i) lfthe Officer's integrity is I:>cyond doubt, It may be so stated.
(ii) If there is any doubt Or suspicion, the column should be left blank and action taken
as
U:ldcr: -
(a) A separate secr\..t note should be rccord.:d and follow.:d up. A cllpy of th~ note should also be
sent togetht r with the confidential Report to th e next sup~rjor OffiCer who will ensure that the
foll ow~up acti.," is taken lxpcditiousl;,. Where it is not possible either to certify tbe integrity or t(l
record th e seefl.:t note, the Reporting Officer should state either that he had not watched the Officer's
work for sufficient time to time a definite judgment or that ho has heard notbing against the Officer,
as the case may be.
(b) If as a result of the follow~up nction the doubt s or suspiCions are cleared, the Officer 's integrity
should be certified ond a n entry mad,; dCcurd;ngly in the confidential Report.
(c) If the doubts or suspicions aec confirmed, this fact should also be recorded and duly communicated to the Officer concerned.
(d) If. as a result of the follow~up action. the doubts or suspiCions are neither cleated uor confirm..:d
the Officcr's conduct should be watched for a fu rth·:e period and thereafter action taken as indicatOO
at (b) and (0) above.
{MiuislrY of Rom~ Affairs O. M. No. 51/4, 64-Esll. (A). dateq 21.6-1965].
Download