Document 12820910

advertisement
BIBLIOGRAPHY
American Petroleum Institute, U.S. Industry’s Environmental Expenditures
1990–1999, Washington, DC, January 19, 2001.
Association of Oil Pipe Lines, “How Pipelines Work,” Washington, DC, 2002,
available at http://www.aopl.org/about/work.html (last accessed May 8,
2003).
Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Statistics 2001,
Washington, DC, July 2002.
California Air Resources Board, Cleaner-Burning Gasoline Without MTBE,
Sacramento, January 23, 2003.
Deutsche Bank, Global Oils 2002: New Connections, Global Oil & Gas Research,
New York, January 2002.
Energy Information Administration (EIA), Annual Energy Outlook 2003 with
Projections to 2025, Washington, DC, January 9, 2003b.
____, Annual Energy Review 2001, Washington, DC, November 2002a.
____, Performance Profiles of Major Energy Producers 2001, Washington, DC,
January 2003a.
____, Petroleum Supply Annual 2001, Washington, DC, June 2002b.
____, Petroleum Supply Monthly, Washington, DC, March 2003c.
____, Transition to Ultra-Low-Sulfur Diesel Fuel, Washington, DC, May 2001.
Environmental Protection Agency, The Impact of Environmental Compliance
Costs on U.S. Refining Profitability, Washington, DC, October 1997.
Federal Trade Commission, “FTC Issues Report on Midwest Gasoline Price
Investigation,” Washington, DC, March 30, 2001b.
Federal Trade Commission, Midwest Gasoline Price Investigation, Washington,
DC, March 2001a.
113
114 New Forces at Work in Refining
Harwood, J., “Americans Distrust Institutions in Poll,” Wall Street Journal, June
13, 2002.
Higgins, Terrence S., Director, Refining and Special Projects, Hart/IRI Fuels
Information Services, personal communication, March 2003.
Hoffmann, Peter, Tomorrow's Energy: Hydrogen, Fuel Cells, and the Prospects for
a Cleaner Planet, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 2001.
Industrial Information Resources, “ExxonMobil Follows Major California
Refiners in Early MTBE Ban,” Houston, July 30, 2002.
Martin, Tim, “Global Refining Addresses Increased Oil Demands, New
Challenges,” Oil & Gas Journal, March 16, 1998.
National Energy Policy Development Group, National Energy Policy,
Washington, DC, May, 2001.
National Petrochemical and Refiners Association, Fuels Facts,
http://www.npra.org/news/facts/fuels.cfm, accessed February 13, 2003.
National Petroleum Council, U.S. Petroleum Refining: Assuring Adequacy and
Affordability of Cleaner Fuels, Washington, DC, 2000.
National Petroleum Council, U.S. Petroleum Products Supply: Inventory
Dynamics, Washington, DC, 1998.
National Science Foundation, Survey of Industrial Research and Development,
Arlington, Virginia, various years, available at http://caspar.nsf.gov/
nsf/srs/IndRD/start.htm (last accessed May 28, 2003).
Office of Transportation Technologies, Future U.S. Highway Energy Use: A Fifty
Year Perspective, draft, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC, May 3,
2001.
Peterson, D. J., Tom LaTourrette, and James T. Bartis, New Forces at Work in
Mining: Industry Views of Critical Technologies, MR-1324-OSTP, RAND,
Santa Monica, California, 2000.
Popper, Steven W., Caroline S. Wagner, and Eric V. Larson, New Forces at Work:
Industry Views Critical Technologies, MR-1008-OSTP, RAND, 1998.
Resetar, Susan, Technology Forces at Work: Profiles of Environmental Research
and Development at DuPont, Intel, Monsanto, and Xerox, MR-1068-OSTP,
RAND, 1999.
Rifkin, Jeremy, The Hydrogen Economy: The Creation of the World-Wide Energy
Web and the Redistribution of Power on Earth, Los Angeles, J. P. Tarcher,
2002.
Bibliography 115
Slaughter, Bob, “Comments of the National Petrochemical & Refiners
Association on the Federal Trade Commission’s Second Public Conference
on Refined Petroleum Products,” Washington, DC, April 18, 2002.
Stillwater Associates, MTBE Phase Out in California, Draft Consultant’s Report
to California Energy Commission, Sacramento, March 14, 2002.
Download