SEHEPUNKTE - Druckversion: Rezension von: Common G...
http://www.sehepunkte.de/2015/05/druckfassung/26589.html
sehepunkte 15 (2015), Nr. 5
Sarah E. James: Common Ground
Impressions of East and West German culture have traditionally dwelled on difference and
opposition, most familiar in the wooden, heroic figures of East Germany's Socialist Realism, an easy
foil to the abstract art developed in post-war West Germany. Of course important aesthetic and
political differences influenced state-mandated culture on either side of the Iron Curtain.
Nevertheless, a closer look at the ways that a shared pre-Cold War culture and history influenced
both Germanys, as well as the ways artists in both countries grappled with state ideology and
national identity, illustrates how German-German culture proceeded in parallel and often
overlapped. Sarah E. James explores these confluences in her fascinating book Common Ground:
German Photographic Cultures Across the Iron Curtain, which evaluates East and West German
photography in terms of their similarities, and even mutual or co-constitutive development.
James grounds her text in the photo essay, a genre characterized by serialization, juxtaposition,
and dialogical viewing. Her definition of the photo essay develops across four decades of case
studies, which "make clear how social and political forms of experience and knowledge can be
articulated photographically, how different models of photographic seeing and the social relations
suggested by them can put pressure on the relationship between individual and collective identity;
between the private and public; between the subject and the object; the past and the present"
(237). Moreover, James places East German examples in dialogue with the West, both in theory and
practice. These framings make East German photography more familiar and allow it to move beyond
state ideology into the more ambiguous territories of aesthetics and form.
Five chapters, an introduction, and an epilogue divide Common Ground chronologically, with equal
attention to either Germany. James flips between West and East Germany to demonstrate how
political changes translated into photographic projects across historical and ideological divisions. In
her first chapter, she uses Bertolt Brecht's Kriegsfibel (GDR, 1955) to exemplify how interest in
using the photo essay as an instructive and political tool survived its propagandistic uses in the
Nazi-era. A distinction between Brecht's communist project and Edward Steichen's blockbuster
photography exhibition The Family of Man (USA, 1955) comes to the fore in Chapter Two where
James examines Karl Pawek's Was ist der Mensch? (FRG, 1964). Like Brecht, Pawek disavowed
singular interpretations of photography, but nonetheless embraced its documentary (i.e. objective)
potential. Chapters Three and Four consider how East Germany's Evelyn Richter and West Germany's
Bernd and Hilla Becher used serial photography to critique hegemonic visions of photography and
national identity. James concludes her in-depth analyses in Chapter Five, which argues that Rudolf
Schäfer's Totengesichter (GDR, 1979-81) used death as the ultimate detachment from the political
dictates of the East German state. By this point, the photo essay had become a nebulous, even
anti-idealistic form for both East and West German photographers. This argument is summarily
distilled in a short epilogue, which looks at Michael Schmidt's Ein-Heit (Germany, 1996) as a
post-wall pastiche of German visual culture and text that allows for anything and nothing to make
meaning.
Common Ground's movements across the decades of the Cold War draw corollaries between
1 of 3
31/07/2015 14:43
SEHEPUNKTE - Druckversion: Rezension von: Common G...
http://www.sehepunkte.de/2015/05/druckfassung/26589.html
photographers in both Germanys to highlight a shared aesthetic invested in documentary
photography as a tool to visualize and debate social issues. Its examples highlight the tensions
artists had with the official cultural politics of the German state(s). Even examples that will be
more familiar to a Western readership - as in the Family of Man exhibition or August Sandner's
Antlitz der Zeit (Germany, 1929) - receive fresh interpretations, which dialogue with the post-Nazi
and Cold War anxieties of lesser known East German projects.
The depth of James' visual analyses and historical argumentation can hardly be overstated. This is a
rich text, challenging not only in theoretical application but also in the descriptions of images,
which submerge readers into a beautiful paradox of language: "The Bechers' images are a strange
kind of portraiture, their subjects redolent of industrial families posing for the camera [...]. In each
image, the distanced comparative perspective miniaturizes forms and featureless sky frames each
architectural type, as if the objects were cut-out silhouettes or specimens pinned onto card" (153).
These evocative phrasings complicate even the most familiar images, modeling the complex seeing
James posits as fundament to both East and West German serial photography.
James' descriptions of the public sphere (particularly rich in her chapter on Pawek and Steichen)
and artists' ambivalent relationships to state orthodoxy in the West are robust and add new
dimensions to this history. She introduces similar details about a less familiar East German reality
through the photographs that Richter took of the East German public, especially when she compares
them to covert Stasi surveillance. This discussion compels the reader to wonder how the overt
presence of a camera functioned in the East German public space. How was a person wielding a
camera considered? As a threat? A hobbyist? An artist? Questions likewise linger with regard to the
role that membership in East Germany's artist union played for photographers like Richter and
Schäfer, whose autonomous and obviously state-critical projects contradict a typical vision of what
was indeed permissible. In her pathfinding book, James attends to this ambivalence and highlights
the uniqueness of her case studies, drawing her reader even further into analyses that welcome and clearly warrant - more engagement. Indeed, Common Ground shows how quickly bias and
prejudices on East German art and culture crumble when due, if delayed, attentions are finally paid
them. The difficulties of pursuing this kind of research likewise involve the paucity of comparative
texts on East and West German visual culture, particularly in English. This book faces these
challenges vigorously, offering an engaging and well-informed argument that dives deeply into a set
of dynamic case studies. Common Ground will surely stand as a groundbreaking text for East
German art history and visual culture for many years to come.
As a study that provides new analyses on Cold War German art and photography with links to
pre-WWII German culture, Common Ground parlays with a stalwart art historical conversation and
introduces new examples that move this important and popular discussion beyond a familiar West
German frame. By paying equal attention to both Germanys, it commands a fresh approach to
evaluating Cold War cultures in dialogue. Because critiques of capitalism / neo-liberalism and its
influence on global world culture in the post-socialist era have risen to the fore of scholarship since
the 2008 global financial crisis, James' text and its East-meets-West framing have clear
contemporary relevance. This book should become a new standard in courses of German art history
and visual culture, especially as the Cold War narrative increasingly explores the East Bloc. That it
will inspire further research into this neglected field is guaranteed.
2 of 3
31/07/2015 14:43
SEHEPUNKTE - Druckversion: Rezension von: Common G...
http://www.sehepunkte.de/2015/05/druckfassung/26589.html
Rezension über:
Sarah E. James: Common Ground. German Photographic Cultures Across the Iron Curtain, New Haven / London: Yale
University Press 2013, 275 S., 10 Farb-, 170 s/w-Abb., ISBN 978-0-300-18444-0, USD 75,00
Rezension von:
Sara Blaylock
History of Art and Visual Culture Department, University of California at Santa Cruz
Empfohlene Zitierweise:
Sara Blaylock: Rezension von: Sarah E. James: Common Ground. German Photographic Cultures Across the Iron Curtain, New
Haven / London: Yale University Press 2013, in: sehepunkte 15 (2015), Nr. 5 [15.05.2015], URL: http://www.sehepunkte.de
/2015/05/26589.html
Bitte geben Sie beim Zitieren dieser Rezension die exakte URL und das Datum Ihres letzten Besuchs dieser Online-Adresse
an.
3 of 3
31/07/2015 14:43