Partnership Tasking in Redditch Angela Heighway Kim Stockman

advertisement

Redditch Community Safety

Partnership

Partnership Tasking in

Redditch

Angela Heighway

Kim Stockman

Introductions

Angela Heighway

Head of Community Safety

Redditch Borough Council

Kim Stockman

Partnership Information Analyst for Redditch

Worcestershire County Council

Overview of presentation

• Community Safety Partnership structures

• What is partnership (CDRP) tasking?

• Redditch – Impacts of tasking

• Strengths, Weaknesses,

Opportunities and Threats

• Concluding comments, and questions

Partnership Structures

Worcestershire

Partnership

Local Area Agreement

The Safer Communities Board

South Worcestershire

CDRP

Malvern Hills

Worcester

Wychavon

North Worcestershire

Responsible Authorities Group

Bromsgrove

CDRP

Bromsgrove tasking

Redditch

CDRP

Redditch tasking

Wyre

Forest

CDRP

Wyre

Forest tasking

PACT

Redditch as an example

• Two tier– 1 of 6 districts in

Worcestershire

• Small district (5351 hectares), high population density (14.7pph)

• New town with inherent design faults

• Roughly equal urban/rural split

• Manufacturing largest industrial group

Redditch

• More trees than people along with 94

Underpasses!

• Population of 79,000

• Significant pockets of deprivation

• Young population

• Larger BME population than County

What does partnership tasking mean to us?

• Monthly meeting of partners looking at community safety issues

• The opportunity to focus on the victim and environment

• Information sharing– identifying common issues

• Delivering local solutions to local problems

• Very new process – still evolving

• Identifying common issues

• Getting a fuller picture of the issues

Sharing data

Why was tasking set up?

• Meet the needs of all partners in addressing community safety issues

• Address Section 17 responsibilities

• Focus on specific & measurable outcomes & help prioritise action

• Regularly review progress of projects

• Performance manage the reward element of the LAA

What does tasking involve?

Partners

Communities

Analyst

Presentation

Monitor actions

Actions agreed

Monthly meeting

Who does it involve?

Statutory Partners

Partnership

Analyst

Core Group

Other relevant agencies

Data sources

A range of partnership data including:

– Crime

– Anti Social Behaviour

– Fire Service

– Enviro Crime

– Signal Crimes, Fear of Crime & PACTs

– Socio Economic & Housing tenure

– Ambulance data

• Identifying patterns and hotspots & clusters of offences within single data sources

• Identifying patterns and hotspots & clusters of offences across all data sources

• Moving away from fixed boundaries

(wards, beats) & defining areas based on data (shopping centres, estates streets)

At the ward level…

Within the ward

Example - Church Hill

• Problems identified in

September 2005

• Dispersal Order in

September 2005

• Designated Public

Place Order in

December 2005

• Significant environmental enhancements in

January 2006

Example - Church Hill

Church Hill…

…and more!...

Underpasses (one of many)

Impact of Interventions

ASB across Church Hill

15

10

5

0

30

25

20

Ap ril

Ma y

Ju ne

Ju ly t

A ugus

S ept em ber

Oc to ber

No ve m be r

De cem be r

Janua ry

Febr uar y

2004/05 2005/06

M ar ch

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Ap ril

Ma y

Crime across Church Hill

Ju ne

Ju ly t

A ugus

S ept em ber

O ct ob er

No ve m be r

D ece m be r

Janu ar y

Febr uar y

Ma rc h

2004/05 2005/06

Other Projects

• CCTV in Evesham Mews

• Targeting mini motos

• Gating project

• Tackling fear of crime in Woodrow centre

• Tackling Domestic Violence across

Woodrow

What have we achieved?

All crime & BCS

Criminal Damage

Wounding

Domestic burglary

Theft of vehicle

Theft from vehicle

Interference

2 nd

4 th

11 th

2 nd

2 nd

1 st

3 rd

Above average & rising

Below average & rising

Above average & falling

Below average & falling

Above average & maintaining

Below average & maintaining

Strengths of tasking...

• Politically neutral analysts

• Regular project and progress reviews

• Analysts see the impact of their work

• Partnership buy in & support

• Financial benefits

• Different approaches in the three areas

…Weaknesses…

• Reliant on OIS data

• Embedding tasking in all partners operational and strategic planning

• Still a relatively new process – difficult to be clear about long-term viability/success

• Based on relationships built up over

2-3 years

…Opportunities…

• Develop a knowledge base & to learn from others

• Build strong relationships and work together

• Address the Crime & Disorder Act review

• Address Partnership Assessment

Delivery Service Guidance

…Threats

• Buy in, support and personalities

• Organisational culture & agenda of partners

• Funding Streams

• Change in government focus away from Community Safety

Concluding Comments

• Still a relatively new process

• Fits well with Crime and Disorder Act and

Review and with Home Office expectations

• Partnership working is about developing and managing relationships

• Dedicated analyst support is essential

Contact details…

• Angela Heighway

– Telephone: (01527) 64252

– E-mail: angie.heighway@redditchbc.gov.uk

• Kim Stockman

– Telephone: (01905) 728760

– E-mail: kstockman@worcestershire.gov.uk

• Fiona Dougan

– Telephone: (01905) 728760

– E-mail: fdougan@worcestershire.gov.uk

• David Onions

– Telephone: (01905)766712

– E-mail: donions@worcestershire.gov.uk

Download