FINANCIAL CRIME understanding + prevention + intervention Elena Rusconi – e.rusconi@ucl.ac.uk Theodosis Mourouzis – theodosis.mourozis.09@ucl.ac.uk Inka Karppinen – inka.karppinen.09@ucl.ac.uk Elena Rusconi Background: General and Experimental Psychology Cognitive Neuroscience Research Expertise: neural basis of cognition (mathematics and number processing) multimodal selective and spatial attention Main methods: mental chronometry, neuropsychology, brain imaging (fMRI,DTI), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) Some Recent Works: •The enigma of Gerstmann's syndrome revisited: a telling tale of the vicissitudes of neuropsychology Rusconi E, Pinel P, Dehaene S, Kleinschmidt A. Brain (in press) •A disconnection account of Gerstmann syndrome: Functional neuroanatomy evidence Rusconi E, Pinel P, Eger E, Lebihan D, Thirion B, Dehaene S, Kleinschmidt A. Annals of Neurology 2009 Nov;66(5):654-62. •A brain for numbers Sandrini M, Rusconi E. Cortex 2009 Jul-Aug;45(7):796-803. Tax Evasion • US federal tax gap amounts to $345 billion in 2001 • 16.3% of tax liability in the US • Amount of tax evasion is comparable in most OECD countries • In U.S. only about 15% of the tax gap is eventually recovered via correspondence and field audits (reach about 1% of taxpayers) Homo Economicus vs. Homo Sapiens • Economics of crime: Expected COST/BENEFIT ratio predicts behaviour • When tested empirically: Higher compliance than predicted! ‘Whilst the odds are heavily in favour of evaders getting away with it, the vast majority of taxpayers behave honestly’ (Pyle, 1991) • Additional factors should be taken into account A possible role for social emotions? Shame derives from being looked at …”one is completely exposed and conscious of being looked at, in a word, self-conscious” (Darwin, 1872) NAME and SHAME An Effective form of Punishment and Deterrence? Disclosing Cheaters’ Indentity in a Tax Game Period t Period t income 200€ 30€ income 200€ declared income declared income 30€ AUDIT caught STIGMA caught cheating GUILT SHAME end of t monetary fine 50 end of t … 45 monetary fine shame proneness monetary fine cheating PARDON AUDIT … 40 end of t + 1 35 30 … 25 ? … 20 15 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 cheating score stigma pardon Linear (stigma) Linear (pardon) end of t + 2 ? Research.Project@UCL: THE MIND BEHIND SUCCESS Cognitive Neuroscience . Cost/Benefit evaluation in financial decision making Security and Crime Science .What happens when something goes wrong . Design and test preventive measures (lab + real world) ONLINE FRAUD PREVENTION Theodosis Mourouzis Background : BA in Mathematics , University of Cambridge CASM in Number Theory/Geometry , University of Cambridge Research Interests: Cryptography using Number Theory and Elliptic Curves Algebraic Complexity Prevention of financial fraud is extremely IMPORTANT because it is increasingly occurring on a daily basis. In general we are interested for the following “arguments” to be well-preserved throughout many processes : AUTHENTICITY INTEGRITY CONFIDENTIALITY NON-REPUDIATION Financial Fraud is a very complicated issue so a multidisciplinary approach seems to gives the golden ratio Mathematics (rich structure) Computer Science (implementation) Economics (bounded resources) Psychology (decision making, Being secure or feeling secure?) Current proposed preventions Classical Cryptographic Schemes (KG,Enc,Dec) Can be used to encrypt data transmitted during online transactions, so a possible adversary cannot understand the content Smart Cards [1] Hardware Part (circuit,store data) [2]Software Part ( cryptographic schemes) Main Function: Do efficient calculations, unbreakable Message Authentication Codes Origin/Content of a message Use of Hash-Functions Hard to find collision Biometrics Further Improvements: o Construct more efficient algorithms o Combine efficiently different crypto-techniques o Take into account more the human-factor Inka Karppinen MSc Occupational Psychology BSc Psychology Programme Specialist, Business School, Credit Suisse Project coordinator, Learning and Development, HSBC Programme coordinator, Insurance Institute of London, CII Conducting innovative research in the fields of science and technology, with emphasis on people factors and how to design persuasive technologies and to develop security awareness framework to prevent financial crime. Financial Crime Organisations Employees Security Policy Human Computer interaction Increase security awareness through persuasive technology and cost and time effective training Psychological contract Valued and trusted employee Security as part of employees day-to-day behaviour Loyalty and job security Inka’s Research Interest People factors Organisations -Knowledge, Skills & Abilities Security Policy -Perceptions and Attitudes Increase security awareness through persuasive technology and cost and time effective training Security as part of employees day-to-day behaviour -Decision-making / risk behaviour -Motivation Employees Human Computer interaction Psychological contract Valued and trusted employee -Trust Loyalty and job security Inka’s Research Security Systems Interest Training -Design, development and implementation -Training Needs Analysis (skill gaps) -Usability and Complexity of the system -Design, development and implementation -System vulnerabilities -Evaluation People factors -Knowledge, Skills & Abilities -Perceptions and Attitudes -Decision-making / risk behaviour -Motivation -Trust Inka’s Research Interest Human Computer Interaction Persuasive Technology (Captology) Security behaviours and training Human error Criminal behaviour – Susceptibility