Rev 131 Enceladus’ Plume Solar Occultation LW Esposito and

advertisement

Rev 131

Enceladus’ Plume

Solar Occultation

LW Esposito and

UVIS Team

14 June 2010

Solar Occultation Geometry

The sun was occulted by Enceladus’ plume 18 May 2010

Two science objectives enabled by solar (rather than stellar) occultation:

1. Composition of the plume

New wavelength range

2. Structure of the jets and plume

Higher spatial resolution

UVIS Characteristics

UVIS has 4 separate channels:

• Far UltraViolet (FUV)

• 110 to 190 nm

• 3 slit widths => 2.8, 4.8, 24.9 nm spectral resolution

• 2D detector: 1024 spectral x 64 one-mrad spatial pixels

• Extreme UltraViolet (EUV)

55 to 110 nm

• 3 slit widths => 2.8, 4.8, 19.4 nm spectral resolution

• 2D detector: 1024 spectral x 64 one-mrad spatial pixels

Solar occultation port

High Speed Photometer (HSP)

• 2 or 8 msec time resolution

• Hydrogen –Deuterium Absorption Cell

(HDAC)

For the solar occultation we used the EUV solar port

• 1 sec integration, 1132 time records

• No spatial information because signal from sun is spread across the detector (deliberately)

• Spatial rows 5 - 58 binned to two channels of 27 rows each

• “Window 0” => Rows 5 to 31

• “Window 1” => Rows 32 to 58

• 1024 spectral elements

Occultation is clearly visible

• Window 0 has higher counts, but overall shape is the same

– Position of sun was slightly offset from center, but not an issue

Observation start time: 2010-138T05:51:44.45

• Observation end time: 2010-138T06:10:36.45

• Ingress: 2010-138T06:00:40.45

• Egress: 2010-138T06:02:59.45

• Velocity of sun across plane of sky ~ 2.75 km/sec

• Data shown is summed over wavelength

EUV Spectrum

Navy is unocculted solar spectrum, with typical solar emissions

Red is solar spectrum attenuated by Enceladus’ plume

Composition

• H

2

O and N

2 have diagnostic absorption features at

EUV wavelengths

• The primary goal was to look for N

2 detecting a species with amu=28

, on basis of INMS

• No N

2

(upper limit = 3 x 10 13 , so < 0.3%)

– AMU = 28 detected by INMS is not N

2

– It is not CO in the plume (or UVIS would have seen it in our stellar occs) or it is < 3%

Nitrogen feature at 97.2 nm not detected

Actual

• No dip is seen at all at 97.2 nm

• Upper limit < 0.3%

Predict

• N

2 feature at 97.2 nm fortuitously coincides with strong lyman gamma emission so lots of signal available

• Very sensitive test!

Consequences of no N

2 the interior for models of

• High temperature liquid not required to dissociate NH the plume)

3

(if there is NH

3 in

• Percolation of H

2

O and NH hot rock is not required

3 through

• A catalyst for decomposition is not required at lower temperatures

• No evidence for clathrate decomposition to propel the plume

Zoomed in

No N

2 at 97.2 nm

Absorption is due solely to water vapor

N

2

< 0.3%

Water in the

Plume

• H

2

0 fit to absorption spectrum

Water Vapor Abundance

• To calculate water vapor abundance in the plume the spectra are summed during the center 60 sec of the occultation, then divided by a 650 sec average unocculted sum to compute I / I

0

– I

0 computed at two different times, results were the same

• The extinction spectrum is well-matched by a water vapor spectrum with column density = 0.9 +/- 0.1 x 10 16 cm -2

• Overall amount of water vapor is comparable to previous two

(stellar) occultations

– 2005: 1.5 x 10 16 cm -2

– 2007: 1.3 x 10 16 cm -2 (maximum value of 2.6 x 10 16 cm -2 at center)

• Total water flux constant within +/- 50%

Blue ground track is from zeta Ori occ on Rev 51

Orange is solar occ track, ~orthogonal

Since the plume is elongated, the total flux is same as for

2005, 2007 data

Ground Tracks

Ingress

Egress

Occultation Characteristics

FWHM

Total duration of Solar Occ:

2min 19sec

Duration for full-width half max:

56 sec

Width of plume at FWHM:

145.8 km

Compare to zeta Orionis Occ

– Zeta Orionis occultation lasted just 10 sec

– HSP data summed to 200 msec so 50 samples

Zeta Orionis occultation

Plume Structure and Jets

Density in jets ~2x density in background plume

Plume

Jets

Jet Locations

Minimum altitude a b c d e f

• Window 0 and 1 features match => jets

• Repetition of features in window 0 and window 1 shows they are not due to shot noise

Jets vs. Tiger Stripes

• As before, gas jets correlate to dust jets

Spacecraft viewed sun from this side

• Higher spatial resolution because sun’s passage behind the plume was slower

• Most gas between jets, does not peak at minimum altitude

Ingress

Minimum

Altitude

Egress

Altitude of Sun above Limb

a b c d e f

• Minimum ray height plotted

• Closest approach between a and b

Gas Velocity

• In the case of jet c (Baghdad I) the source of the jet is close enough to the occultation ground track to calculate the height and width

• Half-width of jet c = 2.5 sec * 2.75 km/sec = ~7 km ( w ) at ~27 km ( h ) altitude w w/h = tan ß = v thermal

/ v vert

= 7 / 27 h

Mach number = v vert

/ v thermal

= 3.9

• Mach number from 2007 occultation was 1.5

• New estimate for jet vertical velocity: if v thermal

= 400 m/sec (for ~180 K) then v vert

= 1500 m/sec

• Absorption outside plume, may be solids

Outlier

Analysis underway

• Improve H

H

2

O cross-sections (some absorption features not attributed to

2

O may be visible at higher resolution)

• Quantify differences in column density, water flux compared to 2005, 2007

• Quantify partitioning between gas in jets and gas in overall plume

• Model jets, 3D structure

Download