Post - Katrina Survey of

advertisement
Post-Katrina
Survey of
Faculty & Staff
PRESENTED BY
Dr. Ronald Durnford
Office of Planning & Institutional Research
Respondent Demographics
(Total Respondents = 222)
™ 96 Faculty & 126 Staff respondents
™
68% of respondents have children
(55% of Faculty; 78% of Staff)
Years in New Orleans
Faculty
Staff
Less than 5 years
More than 15 years
16%
53%
4%
86%
31%
28%
44%
22%
Years at Xavier
Less than 5 years
More than 15 years
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Detailed Survey Results
Question
1 - Status
Faculty
Staff
Total
% Faculty
% Staff
% Total
96
126
222
43.2%
56.8%
100.0%
39
40
15
94
3
52
53
10
118
3
91
93
25
212
0.0%
41.5%
42.6%
16.0%
100.0%
2.5%
44.1%
44.9%
8.5%
100.0%
1.4%
42.9%
43.9%
11.8%
100.0%
53
95
148
55.2%
75.4%
66.7%
15
13
4
10
14
21
15
25
13
21
24
46
30
38
17
31
38
67
3 - Age
Under 25
25 to 45
45 to 60
Over 60
4- Children (those responding YES)
5 - Children's age groups:
Pre-School Age
Elementary School Age
Middle School Age
High School Age
Attending College
Adult
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Detailed Survey Results
Question
Faculty
Staff
Total
% Faculty
% Staff
% Total
30
22
17
27
96
56
24
17
25
122
86
46
34
52
218
31.3%
22.9%
17.7%
28.1%
100.0%
45.9%
19.7%
13.9%
20.5%
100.0%
39.4%
21.1%
15.6%
23.9%
100.0%
15
15
14
51
95
5
3
8
107
123
20
18
22
158
218
15.8%
15.8%
14.7%
53.7%
100.0%
4.1%
2.4%
6.5%
87.0%
100.0%
9.2%
8.3%
10.1%
72.5%
100.0%
6 - Years employed at Xavier
Less than 5
5 to less than 10
10 to less than 15
Over 15
7 - Years in New Orleans Area
Less than 5
5 to less than 10
10 to less than 15
Over 15
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Housing Demographics
(Total Respondents = 222)
™
74% of respondents own their homes
(71% of Faculty; 76% of Staff)
™
80% reported homes damaged
(70% of Faculty; 87% of Staff)
™
60% reported had to relocate post-Katrina
(47% of Faculty; 71% of Staff)
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Detailed Survey Results
Question
Faculty
Staff
Total
% Faculty
% Staff
% Total
22
68
1
4
95
23
93
4
3
123
45
161
5
7
218
23.2%
71.6%
1.1%
4.2%
100.0%
18.7%
75.6%
3.3%
2.4%
100.0%
20.6%
73.9%
2.3%
3.2%
100.0%
67
108
175
70.5%
86.4%
79.5%
56
38
77
80
133
118
58.9%
40.0%
61.6%
64.0%
60.5%
53.6%
45
88
133
47.4%
70.4%
60.5%
8 - Pre-Katrina Housing Type
Rent
Own
Live with Parents/Relatives/Friends
Other
9 - Home damaged by storms (# YES)
10 - If Damaged, type of damage
Wind (# YES)
Flooding (#YES)
11 - Relocate post-Katrina (# YES)
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Detailed Survey Results
Question
Faculty
Staff
Total
% Faculty
% Staff
% Total
27
60
1
1
6
95
27
64
11
6
15
123
54
124
12
7
21
218
28.4%
63.2%
1.1%
1.1%
6.3%
100.0%
22.0%
52.0%
8.9%
4.9%
12.2%
100.0%
24.8%
56.9%
5.5%
3.2%
9.6%
100.0%
22
10
8
40
47
16
10
73
69
26
18
113
55.0%
25.0%
20.0%
100.0%
64.4%
21.9%
13.7%
100.0%
61.1%
23.0%
15.9%
100.0%
70
66
136
73.7%
52.8%
61.8%
8
4
8
3
5
28
27
14
27
7
5
80
35
18
35
10
10
108
28.6%
14.3%
28.6%
10.7%
17.9%
100.0%
33.8%
17.5%
33.8%
8.8%
6.3%
100.0%
32.4%
16.7%
32.4%
9.3%
9.3%
100.0%
14 - Current housing situation
Rent
Own
Live with Parents/Relatives/Friends
Other
FEMA Housing
15 - Where planning to settle
New Orleans
New Orleans Suburb
Thinking of Leaving
16 - Plan to remain in current housing (# NO)
17 - If NO, what
Looking for adequate rental
Looking to buy
Renovating previously owned home
Uncertain regarding future housing
Other
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Detailed Survey Results
Question
Faculty
Staff
Total
% Faculty
% Staff
% Total
38
21
2
6
2
1
4
14
88
21
34
9
12
1
10
26
113
59
55
11
18
3
1
14
40
201
43.2%
23.9%
2.3%
6.8%
2.3%
1.1%
4.5%
15.9%
100.0%
18.6%
30.1%
8.0%
10.6%
0.9%
0.0%
8.8%
23.0%
100.0%
29.4%
27.4%
5.5%
9.0%
1.5%
0.5%
7.0%
19.9%
100.0%
8
4
5
2
8
27
16
8
11
5
4
44
24
12
16
7
12
71
29.6%
14.8%
18.5%
7.4%
29.6%
100.0%
36.4%
18.2%
25.0%
11.4%
9.1%
100.0%
33.8%
16.9%
22.5%
9.9%
16.9%
100.0%
13
33
0
7
32
107
192
10.2%
8.0%
0.0%
2.3%
10.2%
69.3%
100.0%
3.8%
25.0%
0.0%
4.8%
22.1%
44.2%
100.0%
6.8%
17.2%
0.0%
3.6%
16.7%
55.7%
100.0%
18 - Current stage regarding housing
Same house, no damage
Settled/resettled
Previously rented, looking for more adequate rental
Previously rented, looking to buy
Previously owned, home demolished
Previously owned, in process of gutting
Previously owned, home now gutted
Previously owned, gutted, now in construction
19 - If construction stage, how advanced
Completion in less than 3 months
Completion in 3 - 6 months
Completion 6 months to 1 year
Completion in more than 1 year
Other
20 - What decisions/issues regarding housing are you now considering
Waiting on insurance settlement
Waiting on FEMA/Road Home money
Deciding whether to demolish home
Deciding whether to rebuild
Deciding about financial matters
Not Applicable
9
7
0
2
9
61
88
4
26
0
5
23
46
104
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Quality of Life Issues:
Importance
R e latio ns hip
6.67
6.63
6.61
6.59
6.48
6.39
He althc are
J o b S atis fac tio n
Quality T im e
S e c urity
C o s t o f Liv ing
P hys ic al Env
6.34
S e rv ic e s
6.34
6.15
6.08
5.83
5.68
5.48
S c ho o ls -Hav e C hildre n
M unic ipal
P e s ts
S c ho o ls
C o m m ute T im e
A fte r S c ho o l C are -Hav e C hildre n
4.89
4.67
4.39
S c ho o ls -N o C hildre n
Dayc are -Hav e C hildre n
A fte r S c ho o l C are
4.32
4.02
Dayc are
3.25
2.98
Dayc are -N o C hildre n
A fte r S c ho o l C are -N o C hildre n
1
1=not at all important
7= extremely important
2
3
4
5
6
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
7
Quality of Life Issues:
IMPORTANCE
FACULTY
Greatest Importance
Job Satisfaction
Relationships with Family
Health Care
Quality Time with Family
Cost of Living
Least Importance
Day Care (all respondents)
Day Care (respondents with no children)
After School Care (respondents with no children)
Avg
6.43
6.42
6.41
6.28
6.16
Avg
3.50
2.80
2.70
STAFF
Greatest Importance
Relationships with Family
Quality Time with Family
Health Care
Security
Job Satisfaction
Least Importance
Day Care (all respondents)
Day Care (respondents with no children)
After School Care (respondents with no children)
ALL RESPONDENTS
Greatest Importance
Relationships with Family
Health Care
Job Satisfaction
Quality Time with Family
Security
Least Importance
Day Care (all respondents)
Day Care (respondents with no children)
After School Care (respondents with no children)
1=not at all important
7= extremely important
Avg
6.67
6.63
6.61
6.59
6.48
Avg
4.02
3.25
2.98
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Avg
6.89
6.86
6.81
6.78
6.77
Avg
4.48
4.00
3.53
Quality of Life Issues:
Satisfaction
Relationship
5.34
5.13
Job Satisfaction
4.78
4.58
4.43
4.40
Com m ute Tim e
Quality Tim e
Services
Healthcare
4.01
3.94
3.83
3.82
3.73
3.72
3.65
3.56
3.52
3.46
3.23
3.23
3.15
After School Care-Have Children
Pests
Municipal
After School Care
Security
Schools-Have Children
Daycare-Have Children
Physical Env
Daycare
Schools
After School Care-No Children
Cost of Living
Daycare-No Children
2.72
Schools-No Children
1
1=not at all satisfied
7= extremely satisfied
2
3
4
5
6
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
7
Quality of Life Issues:
SATISFACTION
FACULTY
Greatest Satisfaction
Relationships with Family
Time Spent Commuting
Job Satisfaction
Availability of Services (grocery, laundry, etc.)
Health Care
Least Satisfaction
Schools (all respondents)
Cost of Living
Schools (respondents with no children)
Avg
5.32
5.04
4.86
4.56
4.49
Avg
3.32
3.25
2.80
STAFF
Greatest Satisfaction
Job Satisfaction
Relationships with Family
Quality Time with Family
Time Spent Commuting
Health Care
Least Satisfaction
Schools (respondents with no children)
Day Care (respondents with no children)
After School Care (respondents with no children)
ALL RESPONDENTS
Greatest Satisfaction
Relationships with Family
Job Satisfaction
Time Spent Commuting
Quality Time with Family
Availability of Services (grocery, laundry, etc.)
Least Satisfaction
Cost of Living
Day Care (respondents with no children)
Schools (respondents with no children)
1=not at all satisfied
7= extremely satisfied
Avg
5.34
5.13
4.78
4.58
4.43
Avg
3.23
3.15
2.72
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Avg
5.40
5.36
4.80
4.55
4.32
Avg
2.63
2.42
2.36
Detailed Survey Results
Importance
Faculty
Staff Difference
Satisfaction
Faculty
Staff Difference
21 - Quality of Life Issues (average score)
Security
State of physical environment
Pests and rodents (rats and mice)
Availability of services (grocery, laundry, etc.)
Health Care
Schools
Day Care
After School Care
Municipal Services
Cost of Living
Time spent commuting
Quality time with family
Relationships with family
Job satisfaction
6.13
5.98
5.14
5.99
6.41
4.86
3.50
3.67
5.64
6.16
5.07
6.28
6.42
6.43
6.78
6.65
6.42
6.64
6.81
6.34
4.48
4.89
6.51
6.59
5.83
6.86
6.89
6.77
(0.65)
(0.67)
(1.28)
(0.65)
(0.40)
(1.48)
(0.98)
(1.22)
(0.87)
(0.43)
(0.76)
(0.58)
(0.47)
(0.34)
3.96
3.74
4.49
4.56
4.49
3.32
4.00
4.09
3.82
3.25
5.04
4.34
5.32
4.86
3.52
3.39
3.46
4.31
4.32
3.55
3.18
3.64
3.84
3.21
4.55
4.80
5.36
5.40
(0.44)
(0.35)
(1.03)
(0.25)
(0.17)
0.23
(0.82)
(0.45)
0.02
(0.04)
(0.49)
0.46
0.04
0.54
1=not at all important; 7=extremely important
Difference is calculated by subtracting
STAFF average from FACULTY average
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Quality of Life: Satisfaction Gap
Cost of Living
Physical Env
Security
Schools-Have Children
Municipal
Healthcare
Schools
Quality Tim e
Schools-No Children
Services
Pests
Job Satisfaction
Relationship
After School-Have Children
Daycare-Have Children
Com m ute Tim e
Daycare
After School
Daycare-No Children
After School-No Children
(3.16)
(2.79)
(2.75)
(2.43)
(2.25)
(2.22)
(2.22)
(2.01)
(1.95)
(1.91)
(1.89)
(1.47)
(1.33)
(0.88)
(0.74)
(0.70)
(0.50)
(0.49)
(0.10)
0.25
-4
-3
-3
Gap is calculated by subtracting
IMPORTANCE from SATISFACTION
-2
-2
-1
-1
0
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
1
Quality of Life: Satisfaction Gap
FACULTY
Greatest Gap
Cost of Living
State of Physical Environment
Security
Schools (have children)
Quality Time with Family
Least Gap
Day Care (all respondents)
Day Care (respondents with no children)
After School Care (respondents with no children)
Avg
(2.91)
(2.24)
(2.17)
(1.98)
(1.94)
Avg
0.50
0.93
1.17
STAFF
Greatest Gap
Cost of Living
Security
State of Physical Environment
Schools (no children)
Pests and Rodents (rats & mice)
Least Gap
Day Care (respondents that have children)
After School Care (all respondents)
After School Care (respondents with no children)
ALL RESPONDENTS
Greatest Gap
Cost of Living
State of Physical Environment
Security
Schools (have children)
Municipal Services
Least Gap
After School Care (all respondents)
Day Care (respondents with no children)
After School Care (respondents with no children)
Gap is calculated by subtracting
IMPORTANCE from SATISFACTION
Avg
(3.16)
(2.79)
(2.75)
(2.43)
(2.25)
Avg
(0.49)
(0.10)
0.25
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Avg
(3.38)
(3.26)
(3.26)
(3.15)
(2.96)
Avg
(1.26)
(1.25)
(1.17)
Additional Stress or Worry Post-Katrina
COMBINED STAFF & FACULTY
2.93 3.00
4.85
4.63
4.42
4.31
4.34
4.38
4.19
3.90
3.74
3.74
3.59
3.55
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
alth
a
of f
g
.
ol..
g
v in
f li
to
cos
al
a ...
ner
al m
Ge
en t
o nm
...
v ir
ith
En
lw
d ea
s
e to
tter
Tim
ma
ia l
a..
a nc
re
F in
is u
e le
ua t
n ...
eq
st a
Ad
in g
.
a in
ty..
int
ur i
Ma
sec
an d
...
e ty
foc
S af
ay
t
s
..
y to
es.
ilit
issu
Ab
en t
ym
plo
rs
Em
atte
.
ym
l ..
mil
on a
Fa
er s
fp
te o
y...
S ta
mil
He
hc
w it
tin
mu
o ns
lati
m
Co
Re
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
1=no additional post-Katrina stress/worry
7= substantial additional post-Katrina stress/worry
Detailed Survey Results
Faculty
Staff
Total
4.78
4.35
4.07
4.29
3.95
4.60
3.17
4.62
3.08
3.37
4.12
3.87
2.64
2.74
4.91
4.87
4.51
4.43
4.37
4.27
4.22
4.07
3.92
3.77
3.70
3.60
3.28
3.08
4.85
4.63
4.30
4.37
4.17
4.42
3.73
4.33
3.53
3.58
3.90
3.73
2.98
2.92
22 - Post-Katrina extra stress and worry
General cost of living
Environmental matters
Maintaining standard of living
Financial matters
Safety and security at home
Time to deal with personal matters
Family matters
Adequate leisure and recreation
Health of family member
State of personal health
Ability to stay focused
Employment issues (self or spouse)
Commuting
Relations with colleagues
1=no additional post-Katrina stress/worry
7= substantial additional post-Katrina stress/worry
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Ranked Stressors
STAFF
FACULTY
General cost of living
2 Adequate leisure and recreation
3 Time to deal with personal matters
4 Environmental matters
5 Financial matters
6 Ability to stay focused
7 Maintaining standard of living
8 Safety and security at home
9 Employment issues (self or spouse)
10 State of personal health
11 Family matters
12 Health of family member
13 Relations with colleagues
14 Commuting
1
4.62
4.60
4.35
4.29
ALL RESPONDENTS
4.12
4.07
3.95
3.87
3.37
3.17
3.08
2.74
2.64
General cost of living
2 Environmental matters
3 Maintaining standard of living
4 Financial matters
5 Safety and security at home
6 Time to deal with personal matters
7 Family matters
8 Adequate leisure and recreation
9 Health of family member
10 State of personal health
11 Ability to stay focused
12 Employment issues (self or spouse)
13 Commuting
14 Relations with colleagues
1
4.78
General cost of living
2 Environmental matters
3 Time to deal with personal matters
4 Financial matters
5 Adequate leisure and recreation
6 Maintaining standard of living
7 Safety and security at home
8 Ability to stay focused
9 Employment issues (self or spouse)
10 Family matters
11 State of personal health
12 Health of family member
13 Commuting
14 Relations with colleagues
1
1=no additional post-Katrina stress/worry
7= substantial additional post-Katrina stress/worry
4.85
4.63
4.42
4.38
4.34
4.31
4.19
3.90
3.74
3.74
3.59
3.55
3.00
2.93
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
4.91
4.87
4.53
4.45
4.39
4.26
4.23
4.10
3.94
3.78
3.71
3.63
3.31
3.11
Rating Morale
7
Xavier’s Morale
Own Morale
6
4.90
5.35
4.94
4.43
4.39
3.77
5
4
3
2
1
Combined
1=Strongly Disagree
4=Neither Disagree nor Agree
7= Strongly Agree
Faculty
Staff
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
Detailed Morale Results
Faculty
Staff
Total
Difference
23 - Currently, the morale at Xavier is very good
3.77
4.90
4.39
(1.13)
23 - Currently, my own morale is very good
4.43
5.35
4.94
(0.92)
0.66
0.45
0.55
0.21
Rate Own Morale as Better than Xavier Morale by this much
1=Strongly Disagree
4=Neither Disagree nor Agree
7= Strongly Agree
Difference is calculated by
subtracting STAFF average
from FACULTY average
Office of Planning
& Institutional Research
CONTACT
Dr. Ronald Durnford
Office of Planning & Institutional Research
rdurnfor@xula.edu
(504) 520-7566
Download