Post-Katrina Survey of Faculty & Staff PRESENTED BY Dr. Ronald Durnford Office of Planning & Institutional Research Respondent Demographics (Total Respondents = 222) 96 Faculty & 126 Staff respondents 68% of respondents have children (55% of Faculty; 78% of Staff) Years in New Orleans Faculty Staff Less than 5 years More than 15 years 16% 53% 4% 86% 31% 28% 44% 22% Years at Xavier Less than 5 years More than 15 years Office of Planning & Institutional Research Detailed Survey Results Question 1 - Status Faculty Staff Total % Faculty % Staff % Total 96 126 222 43.2% 56.8% 100.0% 39 40 15 94 3 52 53 10 118 3 91 93 25 212 0.0% 41.5% 42.6% 16.0% 100.0% 2.5% 44.1% 44.9% 8.5% 100.0% 1.4% 42.9% 43.9% 11.8% 100.0% 53 95 148 55.2% 75.4% 66.7% 15 13 4 10 14 21 15 25 13 21 24 46 30 38 17 31 38 67 3 - Age Under 25 25 to 45 45 to 60 Over 60 4- Children (those responding YES) 5 - Children's age groups: Pre-School Age Elementary School Age Middle School Age High School Age Attending College Adult Office of Planning & Institutional Research Detailed Survey Results Question Faculty Staff Total % Faculty % Staff % Total 30 22 17 27 96 56 24 17 25 122 86 46 34 52 218 31.3% 22.9% 17.7% 28.1% 100.0% 45.9% 19.7% 13.9% 20.5% 100.0% 39.4% 21.1% 15.6% 23.9% 100.0% 15 15 14 51 95 5 3 8 107 123 20 18 22 158 218 15.8% 15.8% 14.7% 53.7% 100.0% 4.1% 2.4% 6.5% 87.0% 100.0% 9.2% 8.3% 10.1% 72.5% 100.0% 6 - Years employed at Xavier Less than 5 5 to less than 10 10 to less than 15 Over 15 7 - Years in New Orleans Area Less than 5 5 to less than 10 10 to less than 15 Over 15 Office of Planning & Institutional Research Housing Demographics (Total Respondents = 222) 74% of respondents own their homes (71% of Faculty; 76% of Staff) 80% reported homes damaged (70% of Faculty; 87% of Staff) 60% reported had to relocate post-Katrina (47% of Faculty; 71% of Staff) Office of Planning & Institutional Research Detailed Survey Results Question Faculty Staff Total % Faculty % Staff % Total 22 68 1 4 95 23 93 4 3 123 45 161 5 7 218 23.2% 71.6% 1.1% 4.2% 100.0% 18.7% 75.6% 3.3% 2.4% 100.0% 20.6% 73.9% 2.3% 3.2% 100.0% 67 108 175 70.5% 86.4% 79.5% 56 38 77 80 133 118 58.9% 40.0% 61.6% 64.0% 60.5% 53.6% 45 88 133 47.4% 70.4% 60.5% 8 - Pre-Katrina Housing Type Rent Own Live with Parents/Relatives/Friends Other 9 - Home damaged by storms (# YES) 10 - If Damaged, type of damage Wind (# YES) Flooding (#YES) 11 - Relocate post-Katrina (# YES) Office of Planning & Institutional Research Detailed Survey Results Question Faculty Staff Total % Faculty % Staff % Total 27 60 1 1 6 95 27 64 11 6 15 123 54 124 12 7 21 218 28.4% 63.2% 1.1% 1.1% 6.3% 100.0% 22.0% 52.0% 8.9% 4.9% 12.2% 100.0% 24.8% 56.9% 5.5% 3.2% 9.6% 100.0% 22 10 8 40 47 16 10 73 69 26 18 113 55.0% 25.0% 20.0% 100.0% 64.4% 21.9% 13.7% 100.0% 61.1% 23.0% 15.9% 100.0% 70 66 136 73.7% 52.8% 61.8% 8 4 8 3 5 28 27 14 27 7 5 80 35 18 35 10 10 108 28.6% 14.3% 28.6% 10.7% 17.9% 100.0% 33.8% 17.5% 33.8% 8.8% 6.3% 100.0% 32.4% 16.7% 32.4% 9.3% 9.3% 100.0% 14 - Current housing situation Rent Own Live with Parents/Relatives/Friends Other FEMA Housing 15 - Where planning to settle New Orleans New Orleans Suburb Thinking of Leaving 16 - Plan to remain in current housing (# NO) 17 - If NO, what Looking for adequate rental Looking to buy Renovating previously owned home Uncertain regarding future housing Other Office of Planning & Institutional Research Detailed Survey Results Question Faculty Staff Total % Faculty % Staff % Total 38 21 2 6 2 1 4 14 88 21 34 9 12 1 10 26 113 59 55 11 18 3 1 14 40 201 43.2% 23.9% 2.3% 6.8% 2.3% 1.1% 4.5% 15.9% 100.0% 18.6% 30.1% 8.0% 10.6% 0.9% 0.0% 8.8% 23.0% 100.0% 29.4% 27.4% 5.5% 9.0% 1.5% 0.5% 7.0% 19.9% 100.0% 8 4 5 2 8 27 16 8 11 5 4 44 24 12 16 7 12 71 29.6% 14.8% 18.5% 7.4% 29.6% 100.0% 36.4% 18.2% 25.0% 11.4% 9.1% 100.0% 33.8% 16.9% 22.5% 9.9% 16.9% 100.0% 13 33 0 7 32 107 192 10.2% 8.0% 0.0% 2.3% 10.2% 69.3% 100.0% 3.8% 25.0% 0.0% 4.8% 22.1% 44.2% 100.0% 6.8% 17.2% 0.0% 3.6% 16.7% 55.7% 100.0% 18 - Current stage regarding housing Same house, no damage Settled/resettled Previously rented, looking for more adequate rental Previously rented, looking to buy Previously owned, home demolished Previously owned, in process of gutting Previously owned, home now gutted Previously owned, gutted, now in construction 19 - If construction stage, how advanced Completion in less than 3 months Completion in 3 - 6 months Completion 6 months to 1 year Completion in more than 1 year Other 20 - What decisions/issues regarding housing are you now considering Waiting on insurance settlement Waiting on FEMA/Road Home money Deciding whether to demolish home Deciding whether to rebuild Deciding about financial matters Not Applicable 9 7 0 2 9 61 88 4 26 0 5 23 46 104 Office of Planning & Institutional Research Quality of Life Issues: Importance R e latio ns hip 6.67 6.63 6.61 6.59 6.48 6.39 He althc are J o b S atis fac tio n Quality T im e S e c urity C o s t o f Liv ing P hys ic al Env 6.34 S e rv ic e s 6.34 6.15 6.08 5.83 5.68 5.48 S c ho o ls -Hav e C hildre n M unic ipal P e s ts S c ho o ls C o m m ute T im e A fte r S c ho o l C are -Hav e C hildre n 4.89 4.67 4.39 S c ho o ls -N o C hildre n Dayc are -Hav e C hildre n A fte r S c ho o l C are 4.32 4.02 Dayc are 3.25 2.98 Dayc are -N o C hildre n A fte r S c ho o l C are -N o C hildre n 1 1=not at all important 7= extremely important 2 3 4 5 6 Office of Planning & Institutional Research 7 Quality of Life Issues: IMPORTANCE FACULTY Greatest Importance Job Satisfaction Relationships with Family Health Care Quality Time with Family Cost of Living Least Importance Day Care (all respondents) Day Care (respondents with no children) After School Care (respondents with no children) Avg 6.43 6.42 6.41 6.28 6.16 Avg 3.50 2.80 2.70 STAFF Greatest Importance Relationships with Family Quality Time with Family Health Care Security Job Satisfaction Least Importance Day Care (all respondents) Day Care (respondents with no children) After School Care (respondents with no children) ALL RESPONDENTS Greatest Importance Relationships with Family Health Care Job Satisfaction Quality Time with Family Security Least Importance Day Care (all respondents) Day Care (respondents with no children) After School Care (respondents with no children) 1=not at all important 7= extremely important Avg 6.67 6.63 6.61 6.59 6.48 Avg 4.02 3.25 2.98 Office of Planning & Institutional Research Avg 6.89 6.86 6.81 6.78 6.77 Avg 4.48 4.00 3.53 Quality of Life Issues: Satisfaction Relationship 5.34 5.13 Job Satisfaction 4.78 4.58 4.43 4.40 Com m ute Tim e Quality Tim e Services Healthcare 4.01 3.94 3.83 3.82 3.73 3.72 3.65 3.56 3.52 3.46 3.23 3.23 3.15 After School Care-Have Children Pests Municipal After School Care Security Schools-Have Children Daycare-Have Children Physical Env Daycare Schools After School Care-No Children Cost of Living Daycare-No Children 2.72 Schools-No Children 1 1=not at all satisfied 7= extremely satisfied 2 3 4 5 6 Office of Planning & Institutional Research 7 Quality of Life Issues: SATISFACTION FACULTY Greatest Satisfaction Relationships with Family Time Spent Commuting Job Satisfaction Availability of Services (grocery, laundry, etc.) Health Care Least Satisfaction Schools (all respondents) Cost of Living Schools (respondents with no children) Avg 5.32 5.04 4.86 4.56 4.49 Avg 3.32 3.25 2.80 STAFF Greatest Satisfaction Job Satisfaction Relationships with Family Quality Time with Family Time Spent Commuting Health Care Least Satisfaction Schools (respondents with no children) Day Care (respondents with no children) After School Care (respondents with no children) ALL RESPONDENTS Greatest Satisfaction Relationships with Family Job Satisfaction Time Spent Commuting Quality Time with Family Availability of Services (grocery, laundry, etc.) Least Satisfaction Cost of Living Day Care (respondents with no children) Schools (respondents with no children) 1=not at all satisfied 7= extremely satisfied Avg 5.34 5.13 4.78 4.58 4.43 Avg 3.23 3.15 2.72 Office of Planning & Institutional Research Avg 5.40 5.36 4.80 4.55 4.32 Avg 2.63 2.42 2.36 Detailed Survey Results Importance Faculty Staff Difference Satisfaction Faculty Staff Difference 21 - Quality of Life Issues (average score) Security State of physical environment Pests and rodents (rats and mice) Availability of services (grocery, laundry, etc.) Health Care Schools Day Care After School Care Municipal Services Cost of Living Time spent commuting Quality time with family Relationships with family Job satisfaction 6.13 5.98 5.14 5.99 6.41 4.86 3.50 3.67 5.64 6.16 5.07 6.28 6.42 6.43 6.78 6.65 6.42 6.64 6.81 6.34 4.48 4.89 6.51 6.59 5.83 6.86 6.89 6.77 (0.65) (0.67) (1.28) (0.65) (0.40) (1.48) (0.98) (1.22) (0.87) (0.43) (0.76) (0.58) (0.47) (0.34) 3.96 3.74 4.49 4.56 4.49 3.32 4.00 4.09 3.82 3.25 5.04 4.34 5.32 4.86 3.52 3.39 3.46 4.31 4.32 3.55 3.18 3.64 3.84 3.21 4.55 4.80 5.36 5.40 (0.44) (0.35) (1.03) (0.25) (0.17) 0.23 (0.82) (0.45) 0.02 (0.04) (0.49) 0.46 0.04 0.54 1=not at all important; 7=extremely important Difference is calculated by subtracting STAFF average from FACULTY average Office of Planning & Institutional Research Quality of Life: Satisfaction Gap Cost of Living Physical Env Security Schools-Have Children Municipal Healthcare Schools Quality Tim e Schools-No Children Services Pests Job Satisfaction Relationship After School-Have Children Daycare-Have Children Com m ute Tim e Daycare After School Daycare-No Children After School-No Children (3.16) (2.79) (2.75) (2.43) (2.25) (2.22) (2.22) (2.01) (1.95) (1.91) (1.89) (1.47) (1.33) (0.88) (0.74) (0.70) (0.50) (0.49) (0.10) 0.25 -4 -3 -3 Gap is calculated by subtracting IMPORTANCE from SATISFACTION -2 -2 -1 -1 0 Office of Planning & Institutional Research 1 Quality of Life: Satisfaction Gap FACULTY Greatest Gap Cost of Living State of Physical Environment Security Schools (have children) Quality Time with Family Least Gap Day Care (all respondents) Day Care (respondents with no children) After School Care (respondents with no children) Avg (2.91) (2.24) (2.17) (1.98) (1.94) Avg 0.50 0.93 1.17 STAFF Greatest Gap Cost of Living Security State of Physical Environment Schools (no children) Pests and Rodents (rats & mice) Least Gap Day Care (respondents that have children) After School Care (all respondents) After School Care (respondents with no children) ALL RESPONDENTS Greatest Gap Cost of Living State of Physical Environment Security Schools (have children) Municipal Services Least Gap After School Care (all respondents) Day Care (respondents with no children) After School Care (respondents with no children) Gap is calculated by subtracting IMPORTANCE from SATISFACTION Avg (3.16) (2.79) (2.75) (2.43) (2.25) Avg (0.49) (0.10) 0.25 Office of Planning & Institutional Research Avg (3.38) (3.26) (3.26) (3.15) (2.96) Avg (1.26) (1.25) (1.17) Additional Stress or Worry Post-Katrina COMBINED STAFF & FACULTY 2.93 3.00 4.85 4.63 4.42 4.31 4.34 4.38 4.19 3.90 3.74 3.74 3.59 3.55 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 alth a of f g . ol.. g v in f li to cos al a ... ner al m Ge en t o nm ... v ir ith En lw d ea s e to tter Tim ma ia l a.. a nc re F in is u e le ua t n ... eq st a Ad in g . a in ty.. int ur i Ma sec an d ... e ty foc S af ay t s .. y to es. ilit issu Ab en t ym plo rs Em atte . ym l .. mil on a Fa er s fp te o y... S ta mil He hc w it tin mu o ns lati m Co Re Office of Planning & Institutional Research 1=no additional post-Katrina stress/worry 7= substantial additional post-Katrina stress/worry Detailed Survey Results Faculty Staff Total 4.78 4.35 4.07 4.29 3.95 4.60 3.17 4.62 3.08 3.37 4.12 3.87 2.64 2.74 4.91 4.87 4.51 4.43 4.37 4.27 4.22 4.07 3.92 3.77 3.70 3.60 3.28 3.08 4.85 4.63 4.30 4.37 4.17 4.42 3.73 4.33 3.53 3.58 3.90 3.73 2.98 2.92 22 - Post-Katrina extra stress and worry General cost of living Environmental matters Maintaining standard of living Financial matters Safety and security at home Time to deal with personal matters Family matters Adequate leisure and recreation Health of family member State of personal health Ability to stay focused Employment issues (self or spouse) Commuting Relations with colleagues 1=no additional post-Katrina stress/worry 7= substantial additional post-Katrina stress/worry Office of Planning & Institutional Research Ranked Stressors STAFF FACULTY General cost of living 2 Adequate leisure and recreation 3 Time to deal with personal matters 4 Environmental matters 5 Financial matters 6 Ability to stay focused 7 Maintaining standard of living 8 Safety and security at home 9 Employment issues (self or spouse) 10 State of personal health 11 Family matters 12 Health of family member 13 Relations with colleagues 14 Commuting 1 4.62 4.60 4.35 4.29 ALL RESPONDENTS 4.12 4.07 3.95 3.87 3.37 3.17 3.08 2.74 2.64 General cost of living 2 Environmental matters 3 Maintaining standard of living 4 Financial matters 5 Safety and security at home 6 Time to deal with personal matters 7 Family matters 8 Adequate leisure and recreation 9 Health of family member 10 State of personal health 11 Ability to stay focused 12 Employment issues (self or spouse) 13 Commuting 14 Relations with colleagues 1 4.78 General cost of living 2 Environmental matters 3 Time to deal with personal matters 4 Financial matters 5 Adequate leisure and recreation 6 Maintaining standard of living 7 Safety and security at home 8 Ability to stay focused 9 Employment issues (self or spouse) 10 Family matters 11 State of personal health 12 Health of family member 13 Commuting 14 Relations with colleagues 1 1=no additional post-Katrina stress/worry 7= substantial additional post-Katrina stress/worry 4.85 4.63 4.42 4.38 4.34 4.31 4.19 3.90 3.74 3.74 3.59 3.55 3.00 2.93 Office of Planning & Institutional Research 4.91 4.87 4.53 4.45 4.39 4.26 4.23 4.10 3.94 3.78 3.71 3.63 3.31 3.11 Rating Morale 7 Xavier’s Morale Own Morale 6 4.90 5.35 4.94 4.43 4.39 3.77 5 4 3 2 1 Combined 1=Strongly Disagree 4=Neither Disagree nor Agree 7= Strongly Agree Faculty Staff Office of Planning & Institutional Research Detailed Morale Results Faculty Staff Total Difference 23 - Currently, the morale at Xavier is very good 3.77 4.90 4.39 (1.13) 23 - Currently, my own morale is very good 4.43 5.35 4.94 (0.92) 0.66 0.45 0.55 0.21 Rate Own Morale as Better than Xavier Morale by this much 1=Strongly Disagree 4=Neither Disagree nor Agree 7= Strongly Agree Difference is calculated by subtracting STAFF average from FACULTY average Office of Planning & Institutional Research CONTACT Dr. Ronald Durnford Office of Planning & Institutional Research rdurnfor@xula.edu (504) 520-7566