REFERENCES
AAN Air-Mechanized Battle Force, briefing charts, TRADOC, June 5,
1997.
Army Science Board: Independent Assessment—Crusader SelfPropelled Artillery System Regenerative Liquid Propellant 155MM
Gun, briefing charts, n.d.
AFCEA, “High-Technology Divining Rod Points Out Human Presence,” SIGNAL, October 1996, pp. 53–54.
Army Materiel System Analysis Activity, Crusader Technical Risk Independent Assessment, briefing charts, Aberdeen Proving Grounds,
MD, February 2, 1996.
Babers, Donald M., “Crusader Ushers New Era for Combined Arms
Team,” National Defense, May/June 1997, pp. 32–33.
Cassady, J. F., Transportability for Better Strategic Mobility,
MTMCTEA Pamphlet 70-1, 1987.
Crusader: The Army XXI Firepower Revolution, briefing charts, U.S.
Army Artillery School, n.d.
Department of the Army, Army After Next (AAN), TRADOC, briefing
charts, n.d.
de Briganti, Giovanni, “Matra: LFK Link to Open German Market,”
Defense News, May 19–25, 1997, pp. 4 and 27.
Fahey, Kevin, facsimile (on Crusader weight) sent to author on June
13, 1997.
39
40
Assessment of Crusader
Fighting with Fires, briefing charts, faxed to author on August 1, 1994
(from TSM-Cannon, U.S. Army Field Artillery School, Fort Sill,
OK), n.d.
Force XXI Heavy Division: Conservative Heavy Interim Design—
Objective (as of 14 May 97), TRADOC briefing charts.
Fratzel, Margaret A. (prepared by), Analysis Plan for the Army After
Next: Fall Wargame, November 1996 and Winter Wargame,
January–February, 1997, Fort Leavenworth, KS: TRAC Study and
Analysis Center, January 10, 1997.
Fuel-Efficient Army After Next, Fuel-Efficient Army After Next White
Paper Briefing, April 1997.
Fuel-Efficient AAN Task Group (prepared by), Fuel-Efficient Army
After Next, White paper, March 1997.
Gourley, S. R., “Fighting with Fires: U.S. Artillery Modernization,”
Military Technology, December 1994, pp. 8–14.
Grimes, V. P., “U.S. Army Begins Digitization Build-Up,” International Defense Review, August 1994, pp. 51–54.
Integrated Idea Team (IIT), Low Risk Blue Force, briefing charts, June
4, 1997.
Joint Chiefs of Staff, Joint Vision 2010: America’s Military: Preparing
for Tomorrow, Pentagon, Washington, D.C., n.d.
Killebrew, Robert B., “The Army After Next: TRADOC’s Crystal Ball
Eyes the Services’ Shape Beyond Force XXI,” Armed Forces Journal
International, October 1996, pp. 36–45.
MacGregor, Douglas A., and Stephen M. Orloff, CAA Analysis: Breaking the Phalanx, briefing charts, Concepts Analysis Agency (U.S.
Army’s Center for Strategy and Force Evaluation), n.d.
Marine Corps Combat Development Command, Close Support Endto-End Assessment (CSEEA) Military Operations in Urban Terrain
(MOUT) Seminar War Game: ASSESSMENT, Quantico, VA, 1997.
(For official use only.)
References
41
Matsumura, J., D. Hinton, and G. Halverson, The Utility of the Sense
and Destroy Armor (SADARM) Munition (U), Santa Monica, CA:
RAND, MR-510-A, 1995.
Matsumura, J., E. Cardenas, K. Horn, and E. McDonald, Future Army
Long-Range Fires: Bringing New Capabilities to the Battlefield (U),
Santa Monica, CA: RAND, DB-107-A, 1994.
Matsumura, J., R. Steeb, G. Halverson, and S. Eisenhard, Options for
Countering MRL Threats: Assessment of Two Near-Term MLRS
Upgrades, Santa Monica, CA: RAND, DRR(L)-1268-A, January
1996.
Matsumura, J., R. Steeb, T. Herbert, M. Lees, S. Eisenhard, and A.
Stich, Analytic Support to the Defense Science Board: Tactics and
Technology for 21st Century Military Superiority, Santa Monica,
CA: RAND, DB-198-A, 1997.
McChesney, Michael K., Modular Artillery Charge System (MACS)
Program Overview, briefing charts, presented to Dr. H. K. Fallin,
Jr., Director for Assessment and Evaluation, OASA (RDA), Program
Executive Office, Field Artillery Systems, February 26, 1996.
Morningstar, James K., “Javelins and Skirmishers on the Battlefield,”
ARMOR, May–June 1996, pp. 37–40.
Operational Requirements Document for the Future Armored Resupply Vehicle, U.S. Army Artillery School, June 14, 1993.
Oetken, Mark, AFAS/FARV Engineering Trade-Off Analysis, briefing
charts, Fort Sill, OK: U.S. Army Field Artillery School, August 3–4,
1994.
Packett, Virgil L., II, Air Mechanization: The Direction and Dynamics
of Army Aviation from a Combined Arms Perspective, thesis, U.S.
Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS,
1985.
Reece, Ralph, Memorandum for Record, facsimile to author, Fort Sill,
OK, October 18, 1991.
Reichelderfer, M., and C. Barker, 155-MM Howitzer Accuracy and Effectiveness Analysis, Division Note No. DN-G-32, Aberdeen Prov-
42
Assessment of Crusader
ing Grounds, MD: U.S. Army Materiel System Analysis Activity
(Ground Warfare Division), December 1993.
Reorganizing the U.S. Army for the 21st Century and Beyond: Concepts for Change at the Start of a New Revolution in Military Affairs, briefing charts.
Smock, Patrick G. (prepared by), Crusader Operational Analysis, Final
Briefing Report, Fort Leavenworth, KS: TRADOC Analysis Center,
December 1995.
Steeb, R., K. Brendley, T. Covington, T. Herbert, and S. Eisenhard,
Light Forces: Heavy Responsibilities: The Role of Technology in
Enabling Future Early Entry Forces to Fight and Survive, Santa
Monica, CA: RAND, MR-473-ARPA, 1995. (For government use
only: not available to the public.)
Steeb, R., J. Matsumura, T. Covington, T. Herbert, S. Eisenhard, and
L. Melody, Rapid Force Projection Technologies: A Quick-Look
Analysis of Advanced Light Indirect Fire Systems, Santa Monica,
CA: RAND, DB-169-A/OSD, 1996.
Steeb, R., J. Matsumura, et al., Rapid Force Projection: Exploring New
Technology Concepts for Light Airborne Forces, Santa Monica, CA:
RAND, DB-168-A/OSD, 1996.
Stix, G., “Fighting Future Wars,” Scientific American, December 1995,
pp. 92–98.
Tactical Technology Office (Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency), Advanced Fire Support System, briefing charts, Arlington,
VA, November 7, 1996.
Tactical Technology Office (Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency), Welcome to the DARPA Small Unit Operations Industry
Briefing, briefing charts, Arlington, VA, January 16, 1997.
Team AFAS, “Advanced Field Artillery System: A Silver Bullet by
Every Measure...,” advertisement pamphlet, FMC Corp./Magnavox/Martin Marrietta, n.d.
TRADOC Analysis Center, Mobility Insights from Army After Next
Analyses, briefing charts, Fort Leavenworth, KS, May 20, 1997.
References
43
TRADOC Analysis Center, Military Art Workshop, briefing charts,
Fort Leavenworth, KS, May 4–5, 1997.
TRADOC System Manager-Cannon and Project Manager
AFAS/FARV, briefing charts, Analytical Foundation for the Advanced Field Artillery System (AFAS) and Future Armored Resupply
Vehicle (FARV), Fort Sill, OK: U.S. Army Field Artillery School, n.d.
U.S. Army Field Artillery Center and School, Directorate of Combat
Developments: Program and Project Summary Sheets, Fort Sill,
OK, August 2, 1993.
U.S. Army Field Artillery School, Fire Support: TRADOC System Manager—Cannon, Advanced Field Artillery System, briefing charts,
Fort Sill, OK, n.d.
U.S. Army Field Artillery School, Preliminary Operational Concept for
Crusader, ATSF-CN, Fort Sill, OK, October 31, 1995.
U.S. Army Materiel Command, Precision Munitions in Army Vision
2010: A Vital Component of Decisive Operations, Picatinney Arsenal, NJ: TACOM-ARDEC, n.d.
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, Army After Next: 1997
Winter Wargame, 27 January–6 February 1997—Game Book, Fort
Monroe, VA: Doctrine Directorate, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, 1997. (For official use only.)
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, Army After Next: 1997
Winter Wargame, 27 January–6 February 1997—State of the World
1995–2020, Fort Monroe, VA: Doctrine Directorate, U.S. Army
Training and Doctrine Command, 1997. (For official use only.)
U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, Force XXI Operations,
Fort Monroe, VA, Pamphlet 525-5, 1994.
U.S. General Accounting Office, Army Armored Systems: Advanced
Field Artillery System Experiences Problems with Liquid Propellant
(report to Selected Members of Congress), Washington, D.C.,
GAO/NSIAD-95-25, B-257925, November 1994.
U.S. General Accounting Office, Army Armored Systems: If Successful,
Crusader Could Revolutionize Field Artillery (draft report to Secre-
44
Assessment of Crusader
tary of Defense), Washington, D.C., GAO/NSIAD-97-121, April
1997. (Restricted to official use.)
U.S. General Accounting Office, Army Armored Systems: Meeting
Crusader Requirements Will Be a Technical Challenge (report to
Secretary of Defense), Washington, D.C., GAO/NSIAD-97-121,
B-276453, June 1997. (Restricted to official use.)
U.S. General Accounting Office, Industrial Base: Inventory and Requirements for Artillery Projectiles (report to Congressional requesters), Washington, D.C., GAO/NSIAD-95-89, B-260292, March
1995.
Vector Research, Incorporated, Vector-3 Campaign Scenarios and
Analysis Samples, briefing charts, Ann Arbor, MI: Texas Instruments, April 30, 1997.
Wass de Czege, Huba, Air Mechanization by 2025? TRADOC briefing
charts, May 20, 1996.
Williams, Bristol W., Jr. (presented by), Crusader Solid Propellant Operational Analysis, briefing charts, Fort Monroe, VA: U.S. Army
Training and Doctrine Command, n.d.