Annual Program Review Update
*Be sure to include information from all three campuses.
Program/Discipline: _____ Art________________________
Date: ______ 10/30/07 ____________________
Trends and Relevant Data
1. Has there been any change in the status of your program or area? (Have you shifted departments? Have new degrees or certificates been created by your program? Have you added or deleted courses? Have activities in other programs impacted your area or program?
Eureka Campus: Our most significant change in the last four years is the loss of two full-time faculty members due to a resignation (in
2003) and a retirement (in 2007.) Neither of these positions has been replaced. 72.6% of all art sections on the Eureka campus, as a result, are currently taught by part-time faculty. As will be elaborated upon below, we are in immediate need of at least one additional full-time faculty member (and a second one as the budget allows) for the
Eureka campus art department.
The diversity of course offerings at Eureka have been somewhat reduced in recent years—principally in order to focus on more general education and core major requirements.
Mendocino Campus: The most significant recent changes are the new facilities remodel and the course curriculum revisions, both of which will be further described below. A general decline in enrollment and loss in revenues from the state have caused reduction in the number of sections. Loss of full-time faculty in technology disciplines,
Sociology/Psychology, and Graphic Communications has caused an overall consolidation of programs and a limiting of course offerings at
CRMC.
Del Norte Campus: There have been no significant changes in the program at the CRDN Campus.
2.
Have there been any significant changes in enrollment, retention, success rates, or student demographics that impact your discipline? If so, please include data sheets (Excel or Word format) showing these changes.
Eureka Campus: Retention Rates have remained steady at an average of 89.8% for Fall and Spring semesters, 2002 to 2007. Section Fill
Rates over this time period average 88%, and Success Rates (students completing the course with a “C” or better) average 77.5%, but these last two percentages are estimated because of errors found in the currently available data for this particular information.

The chart below details EUREKA ART DEPARTMENT ENROLLMENT
PATTERNS (at census) for Fall and Spring semesters, 2002 to 2007:
TOTAL ENROLLMENTS:
900
875
850
825
800
775
750
725
700
675
650
625
600
575
550
Sections: 46 42 29 29 36 36 37 30 29 31 33
Semester F’02 S’03 F’03 S’04 F’04 S’05 F’05 S’06 F’06 S’07 F’07
Academic year 02-03 shows the halcyon days when we had 4 full-time art faculty. Year 03-04 shows a sharp loss in both sections and enrollments due to a full-time resignation (Hayley Barker) and a oneyear sabbatical (Bob Benson), thereby reducing our FT faculty to only
2. We had 3 full-timers again in Fall 2004 and were also allowed to offer more sections. Spring ’06 shows another administratively mandated reduction of sections, along with a reduction of Bob
Benson’s teaching load. 2007 shows a slow recovery in enrollments due to Shannon Sullivan’s hiring and the administration’s incremental allowing of additional sections. Throughout the years, there is a clear relationship between enrollments and sections at the Eureka campus art department: the more courses we offer—the more students we get.

Mendocino Campus: Enrollment in Art sections at CRMC has experienced some decline in the last three semesters, but by and large, enrollments have remained consistent despite the reduction of sections for several years running. The numbers of students graduating from local high schools has continued to decline for 5 years
(down 30-40%) while the county’s population has slowly risen. This growth has been largest in the retired and second-home-buyers’ segment. The McIntyre Report details the growth of this retirementage demographic on the North Coast.
3.
Occupational programs must review the update of their labor-market data, some of it provided by Institutional Research, to illustrate that their program: a. Meets a documented labor market demand, b. Does not represent duplication of other training programs (in the region), and c. Is of demonstrated effectiveness as measured by the employment and
completion success of its students.
Not applicable.
Other Resources
4.
Do you have needs (professional development, library resources, and so forth) not previously required by the discipline or not previously addressed in budget or equipment considerations? Please describe.
Eureka Campus: Replacing out-dated art books for the library is an ongoing endeavor for us, and this has been partially satisfied in previous semesters by PLE grants. Many more books will be needed in the years to come, however, and the suspension of the PLE will impact our progress if other sources for replacing books are not found.
On-going technology training for art faculty has been partially satisfied by CTE workshops, but some faculty will need additional training in
Photoshop and Powerpoint as our visual resources delivery system goes digital—a project in progress at the time of this writing.
In the past, funding for travel to professional conferences has been adequate, and this funding needs to be maintained—particularly for annual travel to the College Art Association Conference (CAA), the
National Council on Education for the Ceramic Arts (NCECA), and the
California Conference for the Advancement of Ceramic Art (CCACA.)
Mendocino Campus: Our campus is undergoing a major remodel that is restructuring the current library. As a part of this restructure, an inventory of the collection (including on-line and AV resources) is currently underway.

5.
Does your discipline need additional support from Student Services beyond that previously provided?
Eureka Campus: We need a full-time articulation officer on campus to maintain (and also expand) the agreements we have for transferable major requirements at the CSU and UC systems.
Mendocino Campus: No additional support is needed.
Human Resource Needs
6.
Complete the Faculty Employment Grids below (please list full- and part-time faculty numbers in separate rows):
Faculty Load Distribution in the Program
Discipline
Name
(e.g., Math,
English,
Accounting)
Art
Total
Teaching
Load for fall
2006 term
% of Total
Teaching
Load by Full-
Time Faculty
% of Total
Teaching Load
Taught by Part-
Time Faculty
Districtwide
TLUs:
276
Eureka campus
TLUs:
151
Districtwide:
29.7%
Eureka campus:
36.9%
Districtwide: 70.3%
Eureka campus:
63.1%
Changes from fall 2005
Districtwide: +6
TLUs and an increase by 15.4% of total teaching load by FT faculty.
Explanations and
Additional
Information (e.g., retirement, reassignment, etc.)
The current FT to PT ratio for the Eureka campus is
27.4% FT and
72.6% PT. The current TLU for art at Eureka is
166.75.
Faculty Load Distribution in the Program
Discipline
Name
(e.g., Math,
English,
Accounting)
Art
Total
Teaching
Load for spring 2007 term
Districtwide:
259.75
Eureka
% of Total
Teaching
Load by Full-
Time Faculty
Districtwide:
22%
Eureka
% of Total
Teaching Load
Taught by Part-
Time Faculty
Districtwide: 78%
Eureka campus:
Changes from spring 2006
Districtwide:
+31.5
TLUs and a decrease
Explanations and
Additional
Information (e.g., retirement, reassignment, etc.)
Cindy Hooper took a sabbatical leave in spring
2007, thereby

Campus:
144.25
campus:
24.6%
76.4% of 5.4% of total teaching load by FT faculty. reducing our
Eureka full time faculty to 2— the number we have now.
Do you need more full-time faculty? Associate faculty? If yes, explain why and be sure to include data sheets justifying the need.
Eureka Campus: As the graphs above indicate, our full to part-time ratio district-wide is egregiously out of balance. Our current (Fall
2007) FT to PT ratio for the Eureka campus alone is 27.4% FT to
72.6% PT, and this is with both full-timers over-loaded and only 2.25
TLU reassigned time for Cindy Hooper’s area coordinator duties. We currently offer 33 art sections with 698 enrollments at census. We have a ceramics lab, sculpture lab, photography lab, 2 drawing labs, computer lab and an art gallery—all of which require specialized equipment and oversight. Two full time faculty members and one 10 hour-a-week temporary instructional assistant simply cannot keep our program satisfactorily functioning. Most visibly, our increasingly fragile facilities and equipment are held together in large measure by the uncompensated labor of our associate faculty. This is particularly true for our photography, jewelry, and digital areas, where facilities oversight by associate faculty is 100%.
Finding (and keeping) qualified associate faculty is a huge challenge because of a lack of a Master’s program for art at Humboldt State. Our turn over (particularly for drawing faculty) is high as well. This academic year, for example, 3 new associates had to be recruited, interviewed, hired and trained, and two new associates were hired last year. With an upcoming retirement at Humboldt State at the end of this year, we will very likely lose two of these new hires to HSU, and are already fretting about how we will replace them.
In sum: we immediately need a bright, enthusiastic, and totally dedicated full-time faculty member who will teach our 3 most popular
GE courses: Art 17 (Drawing), Art 2 (Introduction to Art), and Art 4
(Art Appreciation.) This semester’s Eureka census enrollment for all sections of these three courses, for example, is 304. We will also eventually need another full-time faculty with expertise in Digital Art and 3-Dimensional New Media, including video and installation.
One more fact to consider: In spring of 2007, the Eureka Art department (as the third largest on campus) generated 122 FTES, the
Eureka English department generated 139 FTES, and the Eureka Math department generated 187 FTES. Eureka campus Math and English, respectively, currently have 8 and 10 full-time faculty.

Mendocino Campus: Our campus has had the load for a full-time photo/digital imaging instructor and a full-time ceramics/sculpture instructor for several years. An associate or full-time Graphic Designer would allow us to offer Graphic Communications courses in a timely, systematic manner. The current ratio of full to part-time TLUs (26% to 74%) is the closest balance we had in 25 years. 10 years ago, we were 17% full-time to 83% part-time TLU’s.
Del Norte Campus: Finding qualified Digital Art instructors is a challenge for our rural campus. We have qualified Photography, painting and ceramics instructors.
7.
Complete the Staff Employment Grid below (please list full- and part-time staff numbers in separate rows:
Staff Employed in the Program
Assignment Full-time
(e.g., Math,
English)
(classified) staff
(give number)
Part-time staff
(give number)
Gains over
Prior Year
Losses over
Prior Year (give reason: retirement, reassignment, health, etc.)
Art 1 Division
Secretary
1 10-hourper-week temporary instructional aide
No gains No losses
Do you need more full-time staff? Part-time staff? If yes, explain why and be sure to include data sheets justifying the need.
Eureka Campus: Until the mid-nineties, the art program had a full-time technician, but this has been reduced to only one 10-hour a week temporary position. Right now, we absolutely must have at least a halftime technician for the art department at Eureka, and—eventually—will need the return of our full-time position .
Our reduced technical assistance has resulted in the continual decline of our equipment and facilities, and the requirement of faculty to continually make their own repairs. Regrettably also, we’ve also had to scale back our gallery program to just 1-2 exhibitions per year when we used to have 5-6.
This year, in fact, we will have no exhibitions at all unless our tech’s position is returned to at least 15 hours per week.
I recently asked our technician about her current position, and this is

how she eloquently summed up the situation: “When I first began working in the art department I was allotted 20 hours per week, which worked out quite well. I could work 3 six-hour days each week, and
"bank" the extra 2 hours per week to use for time consuming special events such as the faculty and student exhibitions. As you know, each subsequent semester has meant a decrease in hours approved for my position. I believe that the first reduction was to 15 hours, then 12, now 10 hours per week (Spring and Fall ‘07)---just half of the hours I had in the beginning. Which, of course, means I am able to accomplish much less around the department. For a while I donated several hours a week in order to keep up with things needing my attention. I no longer do that, and in fact when I ran out of hours last spring, I simply stopped working. I felt especially bad about leaving ceramics and sculpture in the lurch, but doubt that CR will increase my hours as long as I seem willing to fill the gap with donated hours.”
Right now, our technician has no time for the digital lab, photography lab, drawing/painting labs, and the gallery. She won’t be able to mount any faculty or student shows this year, nor will she be able to manage our expanding sculpture facilities (including the welding equipment) when we acquire it. We simply must get more technical support.
Mendocino Campus: We have no departmental secretarial support and a 12 hour/week instructional aide.
8.
If necessary, to clarify your needs, please comment on current available staff and distribution of FTE's for contract and part-time faculty. Describe strengths and weaknesses of faculty/staff as appropriate to program's current status or future development.
Eureka Campus: Our current faculty and staff are outstanding, dedicated professionals. Our associate faculty and staff are simply providing far too many uncompensated and ultimately untenable hours of labor to keep our program satisfactorily operational. As has been stated also: we are in continual need of qualified associate faculty, particularly for Art 17 (drawing)—our most popular course.
Mendocino Campus: Our instructional aide Bob Jarrel performs all the equipment maintenance for digital imaging, sculpture, ceramics, textiles, printmaking, as there is no on-site maintenance person. Bob also supervises our 6 to 8 annual art exhibitions with the assistance of students and faculty. He also works with students during open studio time, which includes the photo lab. The ceramics studio needs to be kept open for additional hours during critical drying stages of students’ ceramic work, and an additional ceramics technician provides these extra hours. This person’s salary is funded by enrollment fees from community service ceramics students.

As the majority of our CRMC course offerings are taught exclusively by part-time faculty, the textiles, photography, ceramics, graphic communication, and digital imaging facilities/equipment are fully overseen by part-timers as well. We have 6 to 9 highly respected and professional adjunct faculty, most of whom have taught for the college for over 20 years. Our part-time faculty pool is strong—except in the areas of Photography and Graphic Communications, where qualified faculty are very difficult to find.
Our one full time faculty (Bob Rhoades) is department Chair and teaches primarily drawing, painting, printmaking, and sculpture.
Del Norte Campus: The CRDN campus is fortunate to have three
qualified associate art instructors. However, finding new instructors is a challenge.
Facilities
9.
Comment on facilities the program uses, their current adequacy, and any immediate needs. Have your discipline’s facilities needs changed? If so, how?
Please provide a data-based justification for any request that requires new or additional facilities construction, renovation, remodeling or repairs.
Eureka Campus: Our facilities (for the most part) are adequate for our needs for now. Our large drawing and painting room (CA 138) is very impacted—scheduled M-TH solidly from 8:30 in the morning to 9 at night, and on Fridays from 8:30-3:30. Our other drawing room (CA
139) is somewhat underused because of its small size. The ceramics and sculpture rooms are adequately sized, but the lecture section of the photography lab is extremely small. The computer lab is too small as well, and limits our ability to add more computer stations. The gallery is adequately sized, but needs new walls and a new tracklighting system. The sculpture patio is unusable during rainy days, so students’ classroom space could be doubled if an industrial metal canopy could be built over it.
The existing “Bond Projects Master Schedule” indicates that the Eureka art building is slated for demolition and reconstruction in 2012. If this remains the case, I think we can manage with our current facilities until that time, with two respectfully submitted requests: that the wall between the computer lab and the small gallery (which is now used for storage) be knocked down in order to expand our computer lab, and that a sturdy metal canopy be installed over the sculpture patio.
Mendocino Campus: The remodel of the art building will contribute significantly to the shortage of storage and covered wet working

space, especially for sculpture, ceramics, papermaking. Classroom space for studio art classes is adequate for 12 to 16 students— excepting for Room 300—which is a large multipurpose room for drawing, painting, figure drawing. This room will continue to be needed for these particular courses, as it is the only one large enough to accommodate 16 or more students with easels.
Substantial improvements are under way for ceramics, sculpture, textiles, printmaking, and photography, adding to the work area for students, as well as places to store student projects. No new darkroom stations have been added and ADA concerns for the darkroom remain.
Del Norte Campus: The Del Norte campus uses a regular classroom with tables for the art classes. We need to create a storage space in this classroom for art supplies. Fortunately the room is large enough for this. Our ceramics lab has adequate space, but the painting courses (which lack a dedicated art room) need a more clearly defined and organized space for their equipment—including easels and other supplies.
Equipment
10.
Have your discipline’s equipment needs changed? If so, how? Is equipment in need of repair outside of your current budget? Please provide a data-based justification for any request that requires a new or additional budget allotment.
Eureka Campus: The PLE grants have blessed us for many years now, and we will be hurting very soon without them, as our dedicated equipment replacement/repair budget is minimal ($335 for last academic year, for example, and $1,000 for this year.)
Below is a chart of EUREKA ART DEPARTMENT EQUIPMENT
EXPENDITURES (AND SOURCES) for the last 3+ years. It demonstrates that we need an average of almost $14,000 per year for equipment replacement/repair:
Equipment: Source: Amount: Academic
Year:
2004-2005
(Total needed=
$10,084)
Enlargers, computers, scanners and other equipment for photography and digital art
Projection
Partnership for
Learning
Enhancement
(PLE) Grant
Foundation
$9,883
$201 screen for CA League Grant

2005-2006
(Total needed=
$7,040)
2006-2007
(Total needed=
$19,640)
2007-2008
(Total needed so far=
$11,328)
138
Computer equipment for digital art and digital projectors for the art labs
Art books for the library, digital projectors for the art labs, and a computer for digital art
Clay mixer
Refurbishing of glaze room and ceramics lockers, and a new Raku kiln for ceramics
Miscellaneous equipment replacement
PLE grant
Curtains, electrical hubs and conduit for the art lab digital projector project
20 replacement easels
Replacement skeleton for drawing and painting classes
$7,040
PLE grant
One time district funded
Clay Club
Fundraiser
Dedicated
Equipment/ replacement budget
One time district funded
One time district funded
Dedicated
Equipment/ replacement budget
$8,305
$6,000
$5,000
$335
$6,000
$5,000
$300

2 replacement tungsten lights for the slide library
Dedicated
Equipment/ replacement budget
$28
These are our immediate and near future needs: an upgrade to
Photoshop CS3 for our computer lab ($6,000), two new electric kilns
($10,800—our old ones are beyond repair), 10 new potter’s wheels
($8,180—our existing wheels are improperly wired and have been flagged by maintenance as unsafe), 4 Mig welders ($1,000), a metal shear ($1,300) and a table saw ($2,000.) We also need the following photography equipment: 6 enlargers with lenses ($6,000) and 6 timers, 6 enlarging easels, 6 magnifiers and 6 developing tanks
($1,092.)
To complete the “smart classroom” project for the 4 art rooms, the following equipment will also be needed: 4 dell desk tops ($4,000), 4 sound amplifiers ($956), 4 sets of speakers ($700), and 4 wall mounts for the speakers ($100.)
Please refer also to “Appendix B” for an annotated list of these immediate equipment replacement needs.
Mendocino Campus: Most of the equipment in the four classrooms used for studio art is between 15 and 25 years old. Exceptions to this are a large gas kiln purchased 3 years ago (PLE funded), three new
IMAC computers and a large ink jet printer (PLE funded), and a collection of older but very fine traditional film based photographic equipment that was donated to the college art department.
Upgrades to some of the ceramic equipment and ventilation for spraying and glaze mixing are anticipated with the current remodel.
Del Norte Campus: The CRDN campus doesn’t have any equipment needs at this time.
Learning Outcomes Assessment Update
11.
How has your area or program been engaged in student learning outcomes assessment? a. Summarize your results. b. What did your program learn from these results that enabled you to improve teaching and learning in the discipline?

c.
How have part-time faculty been made aware of the need to assess SLOs?
Eureka Campus: Though no formally codified system for SLO assessment is yet in place, a great deal of informal assessment occurs twice a week throughout the semester. In each of our classrooms, every student’s assignment is placed on public display for other instructors and students to view and assess. Instructors frequently commiserate on the success of particular assignments and student work, and also compare the results of assignments and concepts within each course offered. A remarkable exchange of ideas and even healthy competition occurs (amongst both students and faculty) as a result of these twice-weekly exhibitions of students’ finished work and works-in-progress.
Part-time art faculty have been actively engaged in our course outline updates this semester, and many have learned about the importance of Student Learning Outcomes by attending the curriculum workshops hosted by our Curriculum Committee this semester. SLO’s as a result, are currently being integrated into every art course outline districtwide, and all course outlines will have them by December 2007.
Mendocino Campus: CRMC full-time and part-time faculty have been very much engaged in the rewrites of art courses and also in the inclusion of SLO’s. Additionally, monthly exhibitions of student work in the main campus hallway prompts engaging dialog with art and nonart faculty on the subject of Student Learning Outcomes.
CRMC faculty meetings on the subject of exhibitions, curriculum update training sessions, and the facilities remodel project continue to contribute to the Student Learning Outcome dialog, and also improves the learning environment department and campus-wide.
Curriculum Update
(Reminder: Send updated course outlines to the Curriculum Committee.)
12.
Identify curricular revisions, program innovations, and new initiatives undertaken in the last year.
This semester, the entire art discipline district-wide is updating all course outlines, and plans to have the work completed by December
2007. Additionally, we have inactivated courses that are no longer frequently taught, including Art 146, 150, 151, 20, 36, 38, 39, 44, 45,
47, 5, 6, 61, 69, 71 and 87.
Eureka campus: One new innovation includes the installation of ceiling-mounted digital projectors (and internet access) in 4 of the art

classrooms, and also the digitizing of our visual resources archive.
Additionally, the new associate faculty we’ve hired this year are very tech savvy, and are quickly adopting these “smart classroom” resources, as well as integrating technology into the teaching of studio and lecture-based art courses. Our associate faculty Lindsay Coats, for example, is integrating digital video into her drawing course assignments, and our associate David Zdrazil will be offering an online art appreciation course for the first time this spring 2008.
Mendocino campus: Curriculum updates will sequentially streamline the course content of varied printmaking, photography and textile offerings.
13.
Identify curricular revisions, program innovations, and new initiatives planned for the next year.
Eureka campus: Our goals for the next year and beyond are to continue integrating New Media (including digital art, video, performance, installation, and interdisciplinary arts) into our existing art curriculum, and to upgrade and diversify the equipment and media options (including welding) for our three-dimensional courses. We also plan to continue offering on-line versions of our lecture courses, and to offer more field trip courses to major museums and galleries in San
Francisco and elsewhere. This fall, for example, we are offering a field trip course to San Francisco, and next spring, will offer a field trip course to the California Conference for the Advancement of Ceramic
Art in Davis.
Mendocino Campus: A variety of Art 99’s (Experimental Topics) courses have been recently written, and include subjects such as experimental water-based media, papermaking, kiln building, and museum and gallery field trips. These courses will create an on-going rotation of continually new and exciting offerings to augment our existing curriculum.
Del Norte Campus: N/A
14.
Complete the grid below
Course
Art 10
Art 11
Art 110
Art 14
Year Course Outline
Last Updated
2007
2007
2007
2007
Year Next Update
Expected
2012
2012
2012
2012

Art 146
Art 150
Art 22
Art 23
Art 26
Art 28
Art 31A
Art 31B
Art 32
Art 35
Art 36
Art 37
Art 38
Art 151
Art 155
Art 16
Art 163
Art 165
Art 166
Art 17
Art 18
Art 18L
Art 19
Art 1A
Art 1B
Art 2
Art 20
Art 39
Art 3A
Art 3B
Art 4
Art 43A
Art 43B
Art 44
Art 45
Art 47
Course inactivated
2007
Course inactivated
2007
Course inactivated
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
Course inactivated
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
Course inactivated
2007
2007
Course inactivated
2007
Course inactivated
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
Course inactivated
2007
Course inactivated
2007
Course inactivated
2007
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012

Art 5
Art 52
Art 53
Art 54
Art 55
Art 56
Art 57
Art 58
Art 59
Art 6
Art 60/60L
Art 61
Art 62
Art 63
Art 64
Art 67
Art 69
Art 70
Art 71
Art 87
Course inactivated
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
Course inactivated
2007
2007
Course inactivated
2007
2007
2007
2007
2007
Course inactivated
2007
2007
Course inactivated
2007
Course inactivated
2007
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
Goals and Plans
15.
If you have recently undergone a comprehensive review, attach your Quality
Improvement Plan if applicable.
Not applicable.
16.
If you do not have a QIP, what goals and plans does your area have for the coming year?
Eureka Campus Goals and Plans:
1.
Obtain a full-time art faculty to teach our 3 most popular GE courses.
2.
Obtain a full-time art faculty to teach New Media courses, including digital arts, video, and installation, alongside (and within the context of) our existing general education course offerings.
3.
Infuse our existing curriculum with more New Media concepts
(including digital art, video, performance, installation, and interdisciplinary arts.)

4.
Infuse our existing curriculum with more Multicultural imagery, media, and concepts.
5.
Expand our computer lab into the former small gallery.
6.
Install a canopy over the sculpture patio to increase classroom space— particularly for welding activities.
7.
Obtain the needed equipment detailed in this document—most especially so that we can upgrade and expand our digital art, photography, and ceramics/sculpture curriculum.
8.
Continue to upgrade and expand our digital image archive and delivery system.
9.
Develop a comprehensive plan for assessing Student Learning
Outcomes for each course we offer.
Mendocino Campus Goals and Plans:
1.
Complete the facilities remodel, update all courses, and introduce new courses to create a renewed and improved program for CRMC art students.
2.
Expand our digital instruction within our photography, video, animation, and illustration courses.
3.
Collaborate with the Digital Media program to offer more digitallybased course content for the teaching of illustration.
Del Norte Campus Goals and Plans:
1.
Recruit and hire a qualified associate faculty member in the Digital Art discipline.
2.
Provide appropriate storage space for the art supplies and equipment in the designated classroom space for art courses.

Annual Program Review Update : EUREKA CAMPUS ART DEPARTMENT
Needs Worksheet
Resources
This section to be filled out by the program at each campus
Campus/Program
Please list/summarize the needs of your program on your campus below
This section to be filled out by
Subcommittee
Degree of
Justification (as
Approval
Status substantiated by the program review)
List Resources Needed for Academic Year___2007-2008 / 2008-2009________________
1. 2 Full Time faculty positions in art (see below.)
2. An increase of our tech support position from 10-20 hours per week (see below.)
3. 2 remodel projects for the Art building (see below.)
4. $42,128 in technology equipment and equipment replacement/repair (see below.)
17

Annual Program Review Update: EUREKA CAMPUS ART DEPARTMENT
Faculty
This section to be filled out by the program at each campus
Please list/summarize the needs of your program on your campus below
Campus/Program Needs Worksheet
This section to be filled out by
Subcommittee
Degree of
Justification (as
Approval
Status substantiated by the program review)
List Faculty Positions Needed for Academic Year_____2008-2009 / 2009-
2010______________
1. A full time Art Professor to teach GE courses, including Art 17 (Drawing), Art 2
(Introduction to Art), and Art 4 (Art Appreciation.)
2. A full time Art Professor to teach courses in Digital Art (Art 43A/B), Sculpture (Art 3A), and New Media courses as well.
3.
4.
5.

Annual Program Review Update: EUREKA CAMPUS ART DEPARTMENT
Staff
This section to be filled out by the program at each campus
Please list/summarize the needs of your program on your campus below
Campus/Program Needs Worksheet
This section to be filled out by
Subcommittee
Approval
Status
Degree of Justification (as substantiated by the program review)
List Staff Positions Needed for Academic Year_ ASAP: 2007-2008_________
1. A 20+ hour per week instructional support staff person for all areas of the art department, including ceramics, sculpture, drawing/painting, photography, digital art and the gallery.
2.
3.
4.
5.

Annual Program Review Update: EUREKA CAMPUS ART DEPARTMENT
Equipment
This section to be filled out by the program at each campus
Please list/summarize the needs of your program on your campus below
Campus/Program Needs Worksheet
This section to be filled out by
Subcommittee
Approval
Status
Degree of
Justification (as substantiated by the program review)
List Equipment or Equipment Repair Needed for Academic
Year__ASAP: 2007-2008 / 2008-2009
Approximate
Cost
1. Photoshop CS3 upgrade for the computer lab
2. Sculpture equipment: 2 electric kilns, 10 potter’s wheels, 4 mig welders, a metal shear and a table saw.
3. Photography equipment: 6 enlargers, 6 timers, 6 enlarging easels, 6 magnifiers and 6 developing tanks.
4. Digital projection system equipment: 4 Dell Desk top computers, 4 amplifiers, 4 sets of speakers, and 4 speaker wall mounts.
5.
6.
$6,000
$23,280
$7,092
$5,756

Annual Program Review Update: EUREKA CAMPUS ART DEPARTMENT
Facilities
This section to be filled out by the program at each campus
Please list/summarize the needs of your program on your campus below
4.
List Facility Needs for Academic Year____2008-2009_______________
(Remodels, Renovations or added new facilities)
?
1. A metal canopy (with skylights) for the sculpture patio.
2. An expansion of the art computer lab by removing the wall between it and the former small gallery.
?
3.
Approximate
Cost
Campus/Program Needs Worksheet
This section to be filled out by
Subcommittee
Approval
Status
Degree of
Justification (as substantiated by the program review)