Instructional Program Review Template for Academic Year 2013‐2014 (fields will expand as you type) Please provide a concise response to all questions, and include relevant details in direct support of your responses. Bulleted lists may be used to clearly organize information. Section 1 ‐ Program Information 1.0 Name of Program: Fine Arts
Date: 10/18/13 1.1 Program Review Authors (include names and campus locations): Cindy Hooper (Eureka), Emily Silver (Eureka), George Potamianos (Eureka), Shannon Sullivan (Eureka), Josh Craig (Eureka), Ed Macan
(Eureka), Jessica Thompson (Mendocino), Anne Beck (Mendocino), Sara Broderick (Del Norte)
1.2 Dean’s Signature: Erin Wall Date: 11/14/13 1.3 Individual Program Information # of Degrees offered: 2 # of Certificates offered: 0 1.3.1 State briefly how the program functions support the college mission: The Art department provides a variety of courses to satisfy General
Education degree and transfer requirements for CR (Area C), CSU (Area C), and UC IGETC (Area 3). We also provide courses for major
preparation and transfer in Studio Art, Art History, and in several career technical degrees, including Digital media and Drafting Technology. We
also currently have two degree programs AA in Liberal Arts: Fine Arts and the AA‐T in Studio Art.
The College of the Redwoods Music programs provides outstanding developmental and transfer education. We offer standard developmental
courses in the program. The music program offers music majors the opportunity to transfer to a four‐year institution having met almost the entirety
of their freshman and sophomore major requirements. Our music ensembles are comprised of a vibrant mixture of transfer music majors and
experienced local musicians desiring a challenging musical environment. Our Music 44 course represents a partnership with the Humboldt Light
Opera Company. We are currently exploring the development of an AA-T in Music.
1.3.2 State briefly program highlights/accomplishments: Music:
 Continues to maintain an active profile both on campus and in the community. The concert band, jazz band, and concert choir all perform
regularly, both on campus and in the community.
 The development of a community education co-enrollment program with the ensemble courses so students seeking credit and those
wanting to participate for personal enrichment can play together.
Art:

Development of the AA-T in Studio Arts
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 1 
In the final stages of the development of a Certificate of Fine Craft & Entrepreneurship Certificate in collaboration with the Business
Department.
Cinema: Course offerings were cut due to the budget situation and the new TLU allocation model
Drama: Course offerings were suspended this past year. At some point in the future, when reintroduction of Drama courses to the schedule is
undertaken, a new comprehensive agreement regarding the use of the Performing Arts facility by Drama and Music courses should be created.
Section 2 ‐ Data Analysis 2.1 Enrollment & Fill Rate Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Enrollments & fill rates Comment if checked: Enrollment X Art enrollment declined by 16%, which is more than the District’s decline of 12%. Their fill rate at 73% is still above the
District average fill rate of 66%.
Drama enrollment declined by 19%, which is more than the District’s decline of 12%.
Music enrollments declined by 25%, which is more than the District’s decline of 12%.
In Del Norte, there are only Art courses offered from this program. Enrollments dipped slightly over this past year, but their
fill rate at 79% is still higher than that of the District’s.
In Mendocino, there are only Art courses offered from this program as well. Enrollments dipped some over this past year, but
their fill rate at 81% is still higher than that of the District’s.
Fill Rate ☐ These much larger drops in enrollment over the District’s average were due to the TLU allocation shift that happened during
the 2012-2013 academic year. The new TLU allocation scheme shifted the allocation discussion away from historical staffing
levels and established course scheduling patterns to course scheduling that prioritizes student learning and education
outcomes. Since Art, Cinema, and Music are contained in GE areas with lots of options for students there was severe cuts to
the number of sections offered. The change in course repeatability rules has also negatively impacted enrollments in Music
Ensembles.
Comment if checked: Art’s fill rate at 73% is above the District’s average of 66%. The fill rate did fall 9 percentage points this last year even though
4 less sections were offered.
Drama’s fill rate at 58% was less than the District’s average of 66%.
Music’s fill rate at 36% was well below the District’s 66% fill rate. There was a sharp decrease in fill rates in Music the last
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 2 two years. This is likely due to the changes in repeatability rules. In response, students had started to audit ensemble courses.
However, this was not financially sustainable for the institution, leading to the creation of the Community Education option for
those who would like to continue to take these courses for personal enrichment. Course caps for a number of the Music
courses were set at an unrealistically high figure in an earlier era when fill rates were not considered significant and access was
a high priority. Given existing circumstances many of these cap figures should be lowered next time the course outlines are
revised. 2.2 Program Majors Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: # of Majors Comment: AA-T Studio Arts = 1 It is worth noting that this is a new degree approved Spring 2013.
FIN.ARTS.LA = 257 (13 Del Norte, 4 KT, 22 Mendocino, and 8 Online)
It is worth noting that 198 of the 257 FIN.ARTS.LA declared students chose the FIN.ARTS.LA.A.AA pattern.
2.3 Success & Retention Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Success & Retention Success ☐ Comment if checked: Art with a 73% success rate is above the District’s average of 69%
Cinema with a 65% success rate was below the District’s average of 69%
Music with a 72% success rate is above the District’s average of 69%
Retention ☐ Comment if checked: The following disciplines had retention rates slightly below the District’s average of 87%. Statistically they are consistent
with the District’s average.
 Music with an 85% retention rate
 Drama with an 86% retention rate
 Cinema with an 85% retention rate
Art had a retention rate of 87% the same as the District’s average.
2.4 Persistence Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Persistence & Completion rates Comment: Persistence rates are consistent with that of the District. 2.5 Completers Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 3 Select your program and click on: Persistence & Completion rates Comment: Completion rates are consistent with that of the District. 2.6 Program Completers Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: # of Completers Comment: There were 14 completers of the AA Liberal Arts: Fine Arts degree last year. The AA-T Studio Arts degree was created just
this past spring.
Student Equity Group Data 2.7 Enrollments Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp by group Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group below the Enrollments & fill rates Comment: (check basic skills and ethnic groups) Enrollments in this program at Del Norte, Eureka, and KT attract younger students.
 At Eureka, 70.52% of students in this program fall into the 18-24 year old age bracket, while 65.59% of the student
population on the Eureka campus fall into this age bracket.
 At Del Norte, 65% of students in this program fall in to the 18-24 year old age bracket, while 55.44% of the student
population on the Del Norte campus fall into this age bracket.
 At Klamath-Trinity, 64.29% of students in this program fall into the 18-24 year old age bracket, while 44.29% of the
student population on the Klamath-Trinity campus fall into this age bracket.
At Mendocino, 45.13% of students in this program fall into the 50+ year old age bracket, while 17.3% of the student
population on the Mendocino campus fall into this age bracket.
In Mendocino Caucasian’s enrollments in this program are a little higher and Hispanic’s enrollments a little lower than you
would expect based on the ethnic make up of the campus.
2.8 Success & Retention Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp by group Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group below success & retention Comment: Success rates of all groups, but Hispanics, were higher than those of all groups in the District. Hispanic success rate is the
same as that of the District. The retention rates of all groups were similar to that of the District.
2.9 Completers by group Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on ~ by Student Equity Group next to persistence Comment cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 4 Skip this item. Data not provided.
Faculty Information 2.10 Faculty Review and interpret data by clicking here or going to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Faculty (FT/PT) & FTES/FTEF Comment: Art:
FTES/FTEF = 30.0 which is higher than the District’s at 26.7
FT/PT = 26.35%/73.65 which is lower than the District’s 46.71%/53.29%
Cinema:
FT/PT = 33.33%/66.67% which is lower than the District’s 46.71%/53.29%
Drama:
FTES/FTEF = 30.5 which is higher than the District’s at 26.7
100% PT
Music:
FTES/FTEF = 23.3 which is lower than the District’s at 26.7
FT/PT = 46.03%/53.97% which is comparable to the District’s (there’s only one full-time faculty member who teaches an
overload)
CTE/Occupational programs The following Labor Market section should be completed by all CTE/Occupational programs. Only CTE/Occupational programs need to complete this section (2.9). 2.11 Labor Market Data Refer to the California Employment Development Division: http://www.edd.ca.gov/ www.labormarketinfo.edd.ca.gov
Provide a narrative that addresses the following: a. Documentation of labor market demand b. Non‐duplication of other training programs in the region c. Effectiveness as measured by student employment and program completions. Narrative: cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 5 Summary of Section 2 Overall, what did you learn from the data provided in this section? Be sure to indicate if your discoveries apply to the entire district, or if they vary by site. Section 3 – Critical Reflection of Assessment Activities Curriculum & Assessment Data What courses, if any are not on track with regard to a 2‐year assessment cycle? Explain if this is a consequence of how often the course is offered or other mitigating factors such as outcome updates that may have changed the assessment cycle. Music 22B, 22P, 22W and
Music 26A, 26B, 27A. 27B
will be assessed spring 2014.
Music 3, 24A, 24B, 25A,
25B, 61, 64 will be assessed
fall 2013.
Music 44 and 70 will be
assessed when offered again.
Art 42, 43A, 59 and 6 are
being assessed Fall 2013.
Art 11, 32 will be assessed
spring 2014
Art 3A will be assessed fall
2014 when it is offered
again.
Art 110 and 28 have been
deactivated.
Cinema: 1, 2, 3, 6, 8
Music: 32
Art: 30
Cinema: 3
# of course SLO reports submitted during 2012‐2013. Reports submitted in 2012‐13 up to the Sept 15, 2013 deadline were included in 2012‐2013. cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 6 # of degree/cert (PLO) reports submitted during 2012‐2013. Reports submitted in 2012‐13 up to the Sept 15, 2013 deadline were included in 2012‐2013. % of Course Outlines of Record up to date. Includes approvals through spring 2013. Explain any mitigating circumstances. Indicate if you have submitted updated Course Outlines of Record this fall. If there is no plan for updating outdated curriculum, when will you inactivate? View curriculum status: click here or go to: http://www.redwoods.edu/District/IR/Program_Select.asp Select your program and click on: Curriculum Status Liberal Arts: Fine Arts 1
Music: 96%
Music 26L was inactivated
in 2010
Art: 86%
Art 11, 32 are being revise
Art 28, 110, 99B were
inactivated 10/2013
Cinema: 100%
Did the Program Advisory Committee Meet in the last year? Y/N Click here to view the Program Advisory Committee webpage 3.1 What changes have been made to the program based on assessment findings? You may include results from your closing the loop reports that map to your program. As a result of program level assessments a number of courses that were not a part of core major requirements according to the TMC were removed
from the AA-Liberal Arts Fine Arts degree.
3.2 (Optional) Describe assessment findings/observations that may require further research or institutional support. The Art Department needs organizational support from the Associate Dean in assessing Program Level Outcomes for the AA-T in Studio Arts and
AA-Liberal Arts Fine Arts degree.
Summary of Section 3 Provide any additional explanations for items described in section 3. Section – 4 Evaluation of Previous Plans cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 7 4.1 Describe plans/actions identified in the last program review and their current status. What measurable outcomes were achieved due to actions completed. Action plans may encompass several years; an update on the current status, or whether the plan was discarded and why. Click here to view completed program reviews from last year. Actions Taken Current Status Impact of Action (describe all relevant data used to evaluate the impact) Obtain Chancellor’s Office approval for
our AA‐T degree in
Completed Spring 2013
There is already one declared major in this
new degree.
A draft is nearly completed
This was not undertaken. There is now a moratorium
on new DE Curriculum until the college’s substantive
change proposal is approved.
Studio Art. Develop a "Certificate of Craft and
Entrepreneurship" Develop Art 42 and Art 43A as online
courses
4.2 (If applicable) Describe how funds provided in support of the plan(s) contributed to program improvement: Section – 5 Planning Click here to link to Institutional Planning Documents 5.1 Program Plans Based on data analysis, student learning outcomes and program indicators, assessment and review, and your critical reflections, describe the actions to be taken for the 2013‐2014 academic year. Use as many rows as you have actions, and add additional rows if you have more than 5 actions. Please number all rows that you add. Please be specific. This section and section 6 should include a detailed justification so that the resource prioritization committees understand cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 8 your needs and their importance. * Not all actions in this program plan section may require resources, but all resource requests must be linked to this section. 5.1 Program Plans Action # 1
2
Action to be taken: Relationship to Institutional Plans Include the specific plan and action item relevant to your action to be taken. For example: Annual Plan 2013‐
2014 Theme: Persistence; or List the specific action Goal 1: Student Success: to be taken in enough EP.1.6.2 Develop a plan for narrowing the achievement gap detail so that someone outside of your area can for underrepresented student populations. understand. Develop an AA-T in
Music
Submit for approval
and begin offering the
interdisciplinary
“Certificate of Craft
and
Entrepreneurship”
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx Education Master Plan:
Goal 1 Objective 1.4:
Increase transfer and
degree certificate
completions
Education Master Plan: Goal
1 Objective 1.4: Increase
transfer and degree certificate
completions
Education Master Plan: Goal
2 Develop Programs and
Services to Meet Community
Needs
3/6/2014 Expected Impact on Program/Student Learning Describe the expected impact in a way that someone outside the program can understand. The impact should be measurable. Expanded degree offerings to
students. There will be a more
uniform articulation process.
Students who earn this certificate
will be trained to enter the
community with knowledge of fine
arts, design, marketing and
production. They will have skills
such as complex problem solving,
critical thinking, social
perceptiveness and fluency with
current ideas that will set potential
employees apart from other
applicants. This will benefit
employers, increase aesthetic
awareness and visual literacy, and
improve quality of life in our
Page 9 Relationship to Assessment Resources Needed (Y/N) Include all assessment results that indicate that this action will yield the desired impact on the program. If the assessment has yet to be conducted, explain when and how it will be conducted. A yes here requires a corresponding request in the next section. Creation of an AAT in Music will
likely make a CR
degree more
attractive to the
transfer students.
N
N
community as a whole.
We envision students earning both
the AA‐T in Studio Art and the
proposed “Certificate of Craft and
Entrepreneurship” at the same time.
Many of the core classes in the Craft
Certificate (including Art 17, Art 10,
Art 1A/1B) are also requirements for
the AA‐T in Studio Art, and are GE
courses as well. Other courses
(including Art 31A and
Art 3A) are restricted electives for the
AA‐T in Studio Art, and would be
requirements for the
Crafts Certificate. Our AA‐T in
Studio Art and Career Technical
Certificate will be carefully
coordinated to serve students seeking
to transfer to a four-year school, enter
the workplace, start a small to
midsize business, or all of the above.
In the changing climate at California
Community Colleges as mandated by
the Chancellors office, our new AA-T
in Studio Art and our proposed Craft
Career Technical certificate will keep
our department relevant, current, and
exciting for students as we move
forward.
Educational Master Plan
Goal 4 Maintain
Technological Relevance
3 Convert traditional
photography course to
a digital photography
course
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx Facilities Master Plan:
Objective 3.2 Incorporate
sustainable design principles
3/6/2014 Our traditional photography lab has
safety ventilation issues. Managing
the chemicals appropriately and
maintain the facilities has been
difficult as well. Also, the CSUs are
moving towards digital photography
as well.
Page 10 Y
in all development. Minimize
the negative long-term effect
on the environment
4 5 6 7 Replace 5 of the
digital pianos
Bring back Cinema
course offerings
Obtain 7 easels to
replace broken ones
in CA 138.
Obtain 24 digital
writing tablets and
pens for the art
computer lab so that
digital drawing
principles can be
introduced in Art 17,
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx Educational Master Plan:
Objective 4.1 Provide lab
equipment and technology to
effectively support
instructional needs
Two of the electric pianos are 20
years old. The others are old as well.
Gradual replacement will ensure the
necessary instructional equipment
will be available for students to meet
their CLO. These digital pianos also
support the AA-T in Music
Cinema is the only non-studio art
related course in the Fine Arts degree
and the only course on campus that
provides an extensive moving images
analysis.
Strategic Plan Goal 4.2
Improve instructional labs to
support effective teaching
and learning.
These easels facilitate classroom
instruction for Art 17, Art 18, Art 19,
and Art 23.
Education Master Plan Goal
4.1: Provide lab equipment
and technology to effectively
support instructional needs,
and 4.4: Effectively utilize
technology in teaching
Drawing students will become
familiar and proficient in techniques
for creating digital imagery.
3/6/2014 Page 11 Y
N
This action will
support the
achievement of
SLOs 1-3 for Art
17, Art 19 and Art
23, and SLO 1 for
Art 18. This action
will also support the
achievement of
PLO 1 and 4 for the
AA-T in Studio
Arts as well as PLO
1 for the AA Liberal
Arts: Fine Arts
degree.
Y
This action will
support the
achievement of Art
17 and Art 19 SLOs
#3: Create drawings
that successfully
evaluate and
Y
Art 19, and Art 42.
8
9
Maintain and Upgrade
equipment to ensure
safety and
technological
relevance.
Expand digital
instruction
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx respond to
historical,
contemporary,
multicultural, and
interdisciplinary
materials, concepts,
and approaches in
drawing. Also: here
is a link to an
assessment activity
for Art 17 where the
need for more
technology-based
instruction in this
course is recognized
by the participants:
http://webapps.redw
oods.edu/assessmen
t/outcomesource/Lo
opClosedReport.asp
x?assessid=20470
Educational Master Plan
Goal 4 Maintain
Technological Relevance
Educational Master Plan
Goal 4 Maintain
Technological Relevance
3/6/2014 Y Art instruction in the art department
will remain up to
date and responsive to contemporary
and technological approaches and
trends.
Most art courses
have SLOs that
require students
to create artworks
that evaluate and
respond to
contemporary
materials,
concepts, and
approaches in art
making.
Contemporary art is
highly
responsive to
Y Page 12 Educational Master Plan
Goal 1 Ensure Students
Success
10
Expand
interdisciplinary and
multicultural learning
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx Educational Master Plan
Goal 2 Develop Programs
and Services to Meet
Community Needs
3/6/2014 The expected impact will be that
multicultural and interdisciplinary
course content and learning will be
expanded within our department.
Page 13 technological
methods and
approaches. Some
art courses have
SLOs that
specifically
reference digital
instruction. This
plan will insure
that digital
instruction in the art
department is kept
relevant and up to
date.
In the coming year,
we will be using
Program Level
assessment
activities to
inventory the level
of multicultural and
interdisciplinary
learning that is
currently happening
in studio art
courses. The PLOs
we will be assessing
include: 2.
Critically analyze,
interpret, and
evaluate all aspects
of visual culture
using a variety of
historical,
contemporary, and
multicultural
perspectives, and 3.
Demonstrate the
ways that
contemporary art
N practice creatively
and critically works
between or across
established
disciplines.
11
Move the grand piano
from the Forum
Theater to the new
Performing Arts
Theater
Strategic Plan Objective 5.2
Support/increase cultural
activities at the college.
Educational Master Plan
Objective 1.2 Improve
support for students
The grand piano in the Forum
Theater is a beautiful instrument. It
is stored in a climate-controlled box,
which needs to be relocated to the
new Performing Arts Theater for
student and community performances
and productions.
Y 5.2 Provide any additional information, brief definitions, descriptions, comments, or explanations, if necessary. Section 6 ‐ Resource Requests 6.0 Planning Related, Operational, and Personnel Resource Requests. Requests must be accompanied by an action plan in the above section. Requests should include estimated costs. Submit a support ticket if you do not know the estimated costs. If you are requesting personnel resources, you must also include the “Request for Faculty or Staffing” forms, located at inside.redwoods.edu/program review. Submit one form for each request. Additional Instructions: 
Put down the full amount you are requesting in the “Amount” column. Put down the annual amount of any ongoing or recurring costs in the “Annual Recurring” column. For example, a personnel request for a permanent position might show an Amount of $30,000 and an Annual Recurring Cost of $30,000. A request for equipment might show an Amount of $5,000 and an Annual Recurring cost of $200. A professional development request might show an Amount of $800 and a recurring cost of $0. 
If you have a grant or some other source of funding, include in the “Request” column a brief description of the source of funds and the dollar amount that is expected to be covered by the other source and if the other source covers any of the annual recurring costs. 
Note in the “Request” column if this is a repeat request, and how many times you have submitted this request. The item number must match the corresponding action # from section 5. Add rows as necessary. Type of Request (Check One) Operational Personnel Professional Planning To be Development Action # $ reviewed by use # above Amount
Prioritization To be cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 14 $ Annual Recurrin
g Costs Contact Person (Name, email, phone) Request Describe your request here in a way that Committees of the Budget Planning Committee To be reviewed and grouped by Associate Deans. To be reviewed by Faculty Prioritization Committee. reviewed by the Professional Development Committee someone outside the program can understand. Edmacan
@redwo
ods.edu
1, 4
5
3, 9
8, 9
7, 9
6
Five new digital pianos for CA 104
X
Caustic Cabinet 3 ft X 1.5 ft
X
ISS I in Eureka for conversion of photo
lab, supervision of the gallery, art
computer lab, and 2D media area
3-D printer and 3-D design software. This
will enable the 3-D courses, including 3-D
design, ceramics, sculpture, and jewelry to
start teaching their students digital 3-D
skills, which are increasingly important in
the workplace. For the time being, the art
department would like to start with free
software like 123D Design. We should
budget about $2500 for the printer. SAM
fees will cover the cost of the plastic that
the printer extrudes.
24 Wacom Intuos Creative Pens and
Touch Tablets for the Art Computer Lab
“Best” Brand University Easels ($702 per
easel, includes shipping)
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 $6,000‐
$7,000
None
$515
without
shipping
None
X4321
Joshcraig@r
edwood
s.edu
Erinwall@re
dwoods.
edu
X
$10,000
$10,000 X4576
Shannon
sullivan
@redwo
ods.edu
X
$2500
None
X
$2,305
None
$4,284
None
X
Page 15 X4339
Cindyhooper
@redwo
ods.edu,
x4320
Cindyhooper
8
8
8
8
8
@redwo
ods.edu,
x4320
JessicaThomps
on@red
woods.e
du
14”X28” Corelite 10@$49 each
(Mendocino)
X
$500
None
JessicaThomps
on@red
woods.e
du
3” hardbrick soaps 15@$5 each
(Mendocino)
X
$75
None
JessicaThomps
on@red
woods.e
du
6” harbrick soaps 12@$7 each
(Mendocino)
X
$105
None
JessicaThomps
on@red
woods.e
du
9” hardbrick soaps 15@$8 each
(Mendocino)
X
$120
None
JessicaThomps
on@red
woods.e
du
9” full hardbricks 15@$7.05 each
(Mendocino)
X
$105.75
None
JessicaThomps
on@red
woods.e
du
8
8
Quart jars 10@$2.35 each (Mendocino)
2 quart jars 10@$3.95 each (Mendocino)
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 X
X
$23.50
$39.50
Page 16 None
None
Jessica-
Thomps
on@red
woods.e
du
8
8
JessicaThomps
on@red
woods.e
du
Gallon jars (1 kind) 20@$4.55 each
(Mendocino)
X
Gallon jars (another kind) 10@$2.75 each
(Mendocino)
$91.00
None
JessicaThomps
on@red
woods.e
du
X
$27.50
None
Shannon
sullivan
@redwo
ods.edu
8
12 6” kiln posts (Eureka)
X
$20.40
None
X4339
Shannon
sullivan
@redwo
ods.edu
8
12 7” kiln posts (Eureka)
X
$23.40
None
X4339
Shannon
sullivan
@redwo
ods.edu
8
6 8” kiln posts (Eureka)
X
$17.28
None
8
12 9” kiln posts (Eureka)
X
$42
None
X4339
Shannon
-
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 17 sullivan
@redwo
ods.edu
X4339
Shannon
sullivan
@redwo
ods.edu
8
4 ¾” thick electric kiln shelves (Eureka)
X
$128
None
X4339
Shannon
sullivan
@redwo
ods.edu
8
12 1” thick gas/wood kiln shelves (Eureka)
X
$528
None
8
Replace Shannon’s Office Machine (it is
from 2006 and is slow and difficult to
upgrade)
X
$2500
Replace
at least
every 5
years
X4339
Shannon
sullivan
@redwo
ods.edu
8
New elements to replace existing ones in
one of the electric kilns. (Eureka)
X
$924
None
$585
None
$496
None
8
8
20 ton hydraulic press and jack
8 New tables to put in CA 138 and 139
($62 each).
cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 X
X
Page 18 X4339
Shannon
sullivan
@redwo
ods.edu
X4339
Joshcraig@r
edwood
s.edu
Cindyhooper
@redwo
ods.edu,
x4320
EdMacan
@redwo
ods.edu
11 Move grand piano from the Forum Theater
to the new Performing Arts Theater.
2 ISS 1 for Mendocino (replacement position
to support ceramics and 2D studio courses)
X
X
$700
None
$10,000
$10,000
X4321
Erinwall@re
dwoods.
edu
Section 7‐Author Feedback Provide any constructive feedback about how this template or datasets could be improved. The fill rates for courses offered as part of the Honor Program are lower than what they should be since an additional section is created to track
these students.
How much do you agree with the following statements? (mark your choice with an x )
Strongly Somewhat
Somewhat Strongly
Neutral
Agree
Agree
Disagree Disagree
This year’s program review was valuable
[]
[X ]
[]
[]
[]
in planning for the ongoing improvement
of my program.
Analysis of the program review data was
useful in assessing my program.
[]
[ X]
[]
[]
[]
Section 8‐ PRC Response by section (completed by PRC after reviewing the program review) 8.0 The response will be forwarded to the author and the supervising Director and Vice President: S.1. Program Information: Completed S.2. Data Analysis: Acceptable; Trends were identified and data that fell outside district averages included narrative. S.3. Critical Reflection of Assessment Activities: Acceptable. Course outlines are up to date or in process. Good job on streamlining the degree. cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 19 S.4. Evaluation of Previous Plans: Exemplary S.5. Planning: Developing. PRC Suggestions: Item #1: There is only a vague description of a potential impact and no specific assessment or identified assessment data to be used to evaluate the development of the ADT: Music. Items #2, #3, 4, #5, #8, and #11: There is no assessment plan or anticipated data indicated. Items #3, #5, #6, and #11: The described program/student learning impacts do not actually identify impacts of programs or learning. Item #8: There is no program/student learning impact identified. S.6. Resource Requests: Exemplary cFine Arts Program Review 2013‐14.docx 3/6/2014 Page 20