REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Meeting of the Academic Senate
• Eureka: 7351 Tompkins Hill Road, AD 201 (Board Room)
• Del Norte: 883 West Washington Boulevard, Crescent City, Rooms E3 and E4
• Mendocino Coast: 1211 Del Mar Drive, Ft. Bragg, Room 106 B
Friday, November 4, 2011, 1 p.m.
AGENDA
1. Call To Order
2. Introductions and Public Comment: Members of the audience are invited to make comments regarding
any subject appropriate to the Academic Senate.
3. Approve the October 21, 2011 Meeting Minutes
4. Action Items
4.1 Approve Curriculum Committee October 28 Recommendations, Peter Blakemore (Attachment)
4.2 Approve Faculty Qualifications Committee October 14 Recommendation, Michelle Haggerty
(Attachment)
4.3 Approve Faculty Development Committee October 28 Recommendations, Kerry Mayer (Attachment)
4.4 Approve Senate Resolution Regarding Basic Skills Initiative Governance Draft, Mark Winter
(Attachment)
4.5 Endorse AP 4024 Instructional Exigency Plan Due to Adverse budget Environment Proposal, Mark
Winter (Attachment)
5. Discussion Items
5.1 Academic Standards and Policies Committee October 28 Recommendation – BP 4030 Academic
Freedom Proposal, Connie Wolfsen (Attachment)
5.2 College Council Policy and Procedure Drafts out for Constituent Review
5.2.1 AP 4103 Work Experience, Mark Winter (Attachment)
5.2.2 BP/AP 3050 Institutional Code of Ethics, Mike Richards (Attachments)
5.2.3 AP 5055 Enrollment Priorities, Mark Winter (Attachment)
6. Reports
6.1 Facilities Planning Committee Update, Maggie White (Attachments)
6.2 MyEdu, Barry Tucker (please reference MyEdu.com for information)
6.3 College Council Policy and Procedure Drafts out for Constituent Review
6.3.1 AP 5020 Nonresident Tuition, Mark Winter (Attachment)
6.3.2 BP/AP 5700 Athletics, Mark Winter (Attachments)
6.4 Status of College Level Exam Program and International Baccalaureate, Mark Winter
6.5 College Update, Utpal Goswami
6.6 ASCR Update, Bobby Shearer
6.7 College Council October 24 Meeting, Mark Winter
6.8 Board of Trustees November 1 Meeting, Mark Winter
7. Announcements and Open Forum
8. Adjournment
Public Notice—Nondiscrimination:
College of the Redwoods does not discriminate on the basis of ethnicity, religion, age, gender, sexual orientation, color or
disability in any of its programs or activities. College of the Redwoods is committed to providing reasonable accommodations
for persons with disabilities. Upon request this publication will be made available in alternate formats. Please contact Sally
Frazier, Administrative Secretary to the Academic Senate, 7351 Tompkins Hill Road, Eureka, CA 95501, (707) 476-4259,
8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday—Friday.
Next Meeting:
Friday, November 18, 2011
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Meeting of the Academic Senate
October 21, 2011, 1 p.m.
• Eureka: 7351 Tompkins Hill Road, AD 201 (Board Room)
• Del Norte: 883 West Washington Boulevard, Crescent City, Rooms E3 and E4
• Mendocino Coast: 1211 Del Mar Drive, Ft. Bragg, Room 106 B
Members Present: Mark Winter, Mike Richards, Dave Bazard, Bob Brown, Steve Brown, Kady
Dunleavy, Ryan Emenaker, Chris Gaines, Jennifer Gardner, Utpal Goswami,
Dave Gonsalves, Cindy Hooper, Allen Keppner, Philip Mancus, Susan Nordlof,
Sandra Rowan, Gary Sokolow, Kevin Yokoyama.
Members Absent: Bobby Shearer.
1. Call to Order: Copresident Mark Winter called the meeting to order at 1:03.
2. Introductions and Public Comments: Copresident Mark Winter welcomed all members and
guests, and he called for public comments. No public comments were forwarded.
3. Approve the October 7 Meeting Minutes: On motion by Gary Sokolow, seconded by Steve
Brown, the minutes were approved as written.
4. Action Items
4.1
Approve Curriculum Committee October 14 Recommendations: In the chair’s absence,
Curriculum Committee member Allen Keppner presented the October 14, 2011 Summary
of Course Changes; the statement of how the Curriculum Committee supports the College’s
mission; and the proposed curriculum process policy that would require applications for
New Credit Program approval (CCC-501) and Substantial Changes to Approved Program
approval (CCC-510) be submitted four weeks prior to being considered and voted upon by
the Curriculum Committee. Kevin Yokoyama moved to approve the three
recommendations, seconded by Gary Sokolow. Information was presented on the
Curriculum Committee’s discussions when considering a new GE proposal, and senators
were asked to inform their constituents that when proposing a new GE course, the breadth
of the course and the GE criteria will be key factors for consideration. Senate discussion
on the committee’s statement of support for the College’s mission and the request that new
program and substantial changes to approved programs be submitted four weeks prior to
committee consideration resulted in a motion by Kevin Yokoyama, seconded by Bob
Brown, to divide the question into three separate votes. The motion to divide the question
was unanimously approved by the following roll call vote: Bazard – y, Brown B. – y,
Brown, S. – y, Dunleavy – y, Emenaker – y, Gaines – y, Gardner – y, Gonsalves – y,
Hooper – y, Keppner – y, Mancus – y, Nordlof – y, Rowan – y, Sokolow – y, Yokoyama –
y. The motion to approve the October 14 Summary of Course Changes carried
unanimously by the following roll call vote: Bazard – y, Brown B. – y, Brown, S. – y,
Dunleavy – y, Emenaker – y, Gaines – y, Gardner – y, Gonsalves – y, Hooper – y, Keppner
– y, Mancus – y, Nordlof – y, Rowan – y, Sokolow – y, Yokoyama – y. Ryan Emenaker
moved to support the actions of the Curriculum Committee in adopting the statement of
Academic Senate Minutes
October 21, 2011
Page 2
how the committee’s work supports the College’s mission, seconded by Kevin Yokoyama.
However, following discussion and clarification that the statement was not meant to be a
Bylaws revision, Ryan withdrew his motion and Kevin agreed. Kady Dunleavy then
moved to table consideration of the support statement until Curriculum Committee Chair
Peter Blakemore could attend a Senate meeting to present it, seconded by Gary Sokolow.
The motion to table carried unanimously by the following roll call vote: Bazard – y,
Brown B. – y, Brown, S. – y, Dunleavy – y, Emenaker – y, Gaines – y, Gardner – y,
Gonsalves – y, Hooper – y, Keppner – y, Mancus – y, Nordlof – y, Rowan – y, Sokolow –
y, Yokoyama – y. Senate discussion on the four-week procedural requirement for new
programs and substantial changes to approved courses included the clarification that since
the Curriculum Committee has the discretion to set their own agenda, the policy is not
needed. The vote to approve the four-week policy failed by the following roll call vote:
Bazard – n, Brown, B. – n, Brown, S. – n, Dunleavy – n, Emenaker – n, Gaines – n,
Gardner – n, Gonsalves – n, Hooper – n, Keppner – abstained, Mancus – abstained,
Nordlof – abstained, Rowan – n, Sokolow – y, Yokoyama – n. Copresident Winter agreed
to communicate to the Curriculum Committee that the vote is not a rejection of the
recommendation but a statement that it is not within the Senate’s purview to set policy for
the committee.
5. Discussion Items
5.1
College Council Policy and Procedure Drafts for Constituent Review
5.1.1 BP/AP 3430 Prohibition of Harassment: Copresident Richards presented the
proposals and the Summary of Feedback, which was compiled from feedback from
the Senate’s Multicultural and Diversity and the Academic Standards and Policies
Committees, as well as comments from a former Senate discussion and from
constituents. A suggestion was made that in the first paragraph of the BP, the third
sentence be revised to read, “The District shall be free of all forms of harassment,
including that which is based on any of the following statuses: race…foregoing
characteristics.” Senators also expressed concerns regarding having an administrator
be the one to determine harassment and whether that determination might infringe on
academic freedom. Senators suggested that the proposals need to be vetted through
the District’s legal counsel prior to College Council approval. Copresidents Winter
and Richards agreed to forward the feedback to College Council.
5.1.2 AP 3435 Discrimination and Harassment Investigations: Copresident Richards
presented the proposal, and Senate discussion included the suggestion that training
include broader issues than just sexual harassment. In response to a question, Utpal
clarified that once a harassment charge has been filed, there is an obligation for the
person who feels harassed to notify the offender, which is part of due process and also
could stop the offending behavior. The Senate was also informed that the previous
harassment policy included a process for investigations, but this proposal outlines the
process in greater detail. Copresidents Winter and Richards will forward the Senate’s
feedback to College Council for consideration.
5.1.3 AP 4024 Instructional Exigency Plan Due to Adverse Budget Environment –
Recommended Revisions: Copresident Winter presented background information
regarding the proposed plan and the recommended revisions compiled from Senate
discussion and constituent feedback. Mark asked the Senate to consider whether
there is a need for a new procedure when we have AP 4021 Program Revitalization or
Discontinuation Process, and if so, what direction an Instructional Exigency Plan Due
Academic Senate Minutes
October 21, 2011
Page 3
5.2
to Adverse Budget Environment should take. In reviewing the recommended
revisions document, suggestions were made that enrollment trends be considered
rather than just enrollment and wording be added to clarify that faculty participation
is meant to ensure that a deliberate and transparent process for declaring an adverse
budget environment was followed. It was also suggested that faculty in areas that
could be affected be able to provide feedback during the process and that faculty
could be involved in the determination that an adverse budget environment exists.
Mark reported that since the proposed plan falls within the area of mutual agreement,
the challenge is to draft a policy (or decide not to) that both the faculty and the
administration can agree to. Mark suggested that a Senate vote would provide a clear
sense of the Senate’s position on the proposal that the copresidents could take to
College Council, and the draft might be an action item on November 4.
Senate Resolution Regarding Basic Skills Initiative (BSI) Governance Draft: Copresident
Winter presented the resolution, and he explained that the purpose of the draft is to
publically acknowledge the current BSI process. Mark informed the Senate that the draft
had been reviewed by the Executive Committee and will be an action item on November 4.
6. Reports
6.1
Enrollment Management Committee (EMC) Update: Committee member Allen Keppner
presented the 2011-2012 EMC Work Plan that outlines the committee’s goals and who is
responsible for each task. Allen explained that the EMC is looking at enrollment
allocations to ensure that the College’s mission is maintained, and the committee has
discussed the proliferation of GE courses and whether the TLU allocations can support
offering all the approved GE courses. In addition, success measures are being reviewed to
better inform how and where courses are offered and to better utilize district facilities.
6.2 Institutional Effectiveness Committee (IEC) Update: Roxanne Metz presented the 20112012 IEC Work Plan, and she explained that the committee has determined that its role is
evaluative rather than operational. Roxanne reviewed the changes in the IEC membership
structure, which now includes two at-large faculty members, and she acknowledged Keith
Snow-Flamer’s role in chairing and reforming the committee that resulted in an
accommodation by the ACCJC Visiting Team.
6.3 Student Services Updates
6.3.1 Repetition for a Substandard Grade, Withdrawal and Apportionment: Kathy
Goodlive informed the Senate that beginning with Spring 2012 registration, changes
to Title 5 regulations on apportionment limits for credit course enrollment, repetition,
and withdrawals will go into effect. Students will have only three attempts at
repeatability, and the changes will be grandfathered back to 1985 when CR began
keeping electronic records. While the college has the option of allowing a student to
enroll in a course for a fourth time, the district would receive no funding, and the
EMC is developing a rubric for determining whether a student can enroll for a fourth
time. Kathy reported that this will only affect non-repeatable courses, but the state is
also looking at repeatable courses. With the new regulations comes the requirement
that students be alerted, and notification emails will be distributed at least twice
through ASCR.
6.3.2 Auditors Request for TBA Course Information: Kathy Goodlive reported that during
the last round of audits, the auditors requested detailed information on TBA sections.
While the information was compiled, it was time consuming, and Kathy wanted
faculty to be prepared to provide detailed information if it is requested in the future.
Academic Senate Minutes
October 21, 2011
Page 4
6.4
6.5
6.6
Executive Committee Meeting with ACCJC Team Members: Copresident Winter reported
that the Executive Committee met with Team members Trustee Dave Chapel, Professor
Jim Merrill, and Vice President of Administrative Services Michael Renzi on Wednesday,
October 19. Questions and discussion topics included what role the faculty has in the
president’s evaluation, and in budget and facilities planning. They also asked how the
Senate communicates to the Board, and their message was for faculty to be assertive and
stay involved in decision-making processes. Mark said that the Team members were
attempting to identify recommendations to solidify our integrated planning process and
what faculty can do to improve the functions of the institution.
College Update: Utpal Goswami reported that (1) the ACCJC Visiting Team requested a
lot of evidence and that they were very pleased with what they saw. They acknowledged
our good faculty leadership and because faculty and staff are willing to work together, the
college has been able to accomplish a number of its goals. (2) For the first time in years,
the college now has a complete map of the district’s technology infrastructure, and ways to
improve the system are being addressed. (3) Calculations have been made for last year’s
50% Law compliance, and it appears that the College will qualify for an exemption.
Because the numbers are just now becoming available, the College will have a short
turnaround time to apply for the exemption.
College Council October 10 Meeting: Copresident Winter reported that BP/AP 3260
Participatory Governance and AP 5010 Admissions and Concurrent Enrollment were
approved by College Council and forwarded to the Board of Trustees. The Council has
been addressing BP/AP 3050 Institutional Code of Ethics, which may be ready for
constituent review after the next meeting. Mark directed senators to the College Council
website for more information on Council activities.
7. Announcements and Open Forum
7.1
Science Night: Kevin Yokoyama encouraged everyone to attend the annual Science Night,
which is scheduled for tonight, from 5 – 9 p.m. in numerous locations on the Eureka
campus. With the construction on campus, parking and a number of activities will be based
at Creative Arts, and signs will direct people to the various events. Dinner will be available
in the cafeteria, and a bake sale will offer goodies.
8. Adjournment: On motion by Allen Keppner, seconded by Kevin Yokoyama, the meeting was
adjourned at 3:13.
Respectfully submitted by Sally Frazier, Administrative Secretary to the Academic Senate.
Next Meeting:
Friday, November 4, 1 p.m.
4.1
College of the Redwoods
Summary of Course Changes
10.28.11
LEGEND
PREFIX = Course prefix; # = Course Number; TITLE = Course title or title change; NEW = New course or large format/distanced education proposal first
submission; REV = Revised course; REP = Replaces existing course; INA = Inactivated course; UNITS = Total Units and hrs of new or revised course; UC = UC
transferable – indicate UC transfer status by placing an A for approved courses and a P for courses pending; CSU = CSU transferable – indicate CSU transfer
status by placing an A for approved courses and a P for courses pending CR GE = credits apply to CR General Education; underlined indicates new CR GE;
COMMENTS = Review of outline changes, including prerequisites.
Prefix
N
E
W
R
E
V
#
Title/Title Change
PE
68
Care and Prevention of Sports
Injuries
X
HE
7
First Aid/CPR/AED
GUID
41
GUID
8
AG
33
R
E
P
I
N
A
[ Units ]
Lec/Lab
Hrs
U
C
C
S
U
CR
GE
Comments/ Summary Changes
Discipline Code/ Prerequisite Change
A
Course updated. Changes include new course
description and course learning outcomes. Lab
component has been eliminated.
X
A
Course updated to reflect changes made by the
American Red Cross. Changes include course title,
catalog description and course content.
World of Work
X
A
A regularly scheduled course update. Changes
include a new catalog description.
Career Planning
X
A
Course updated. Course learning outcomes
streamlined. New sources of information added.
A
New course developed due to increasing student
demand for more on this subject than is currently
being covered in AG-63 Intro to Sustainable
Agriculture. This course reflects a new requirement
for the AG AS degree. Course also approved as
General Education in Area B - Social Sciences.
Agriculture, Environment and
Society
Curriculum Changes: 10.28.11
X
[3.0]
54 / 0
[3.0]
54 / 0
A
4.1
College of the Redwoods
Summary of Curricular Changes
10.28.11
DEGREES & CERTIFICATES
NEW = New Program (form 501); SUB = Revised program that has undergone substantive changes (form 510); NONSUB = Revised
program that has undergone non-substantial changes (form 511); INA = Inactivated program (form 511); COMMENTS = nature of proposal
Program Title
Agriculture, Business Management
Associate of Science
Curriculum Changes: 10.28.11
N
E
W
N
O
N
S
U
B
X
S
U
B
I
N
A
Comments/ Summary Changes
Discipline Code/ Prerequisite Change
Degree Reactivation. The Agriculture Business Management program
provides the student with employable skills and provides a framework
for further study if desired. Course work is practical and broad-based.
Emphasis is placed on the development of skills in business
management, sales and communication, computers, economics,
leadership, and agricultural accounting.
4.2
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Faculty Qualifications Committee Recommendations
To the
Academic Senate
October 14, 2011
Equivalency to the Minimum Qualifications application reviewed:
Name
Discipline
Recommendation
1. David Franklin
Ecology
Approval
Faculty Development Committee
Round 1 Recommendations to the Senate
October 28, 2011
Prese
nter?
Applicant Name
Status &
Loc
Awarded
10-11
Awarded
09-10
N
Trish Blair
FT, EKA
$700
$0
N
Cynthia Brown
PT, EKA
0
0
N
Becky Evans
PT, EKA
0
0
N
Amanda Gomes
PT, EKA
0
0
N
Ralph (Bert) H. Hafar
PT, EKA
0
0
Y
Sean Herrera-Thomas
PT, EKA
0
0
N
David Holper
FT, EKA
0
1,321
N
Bob McPherson
PT, EKA
500
0
N
Hillary Reed
FT, EKA
0
1,596
N
Wendy Riggs
PT, EKA
0
0
Y
Teresa Sholars
FT, MC
380
$0
N
N
Emily Silver
Gaye Warren
PT, EKA
PT, EKA
500
0
$0
$0
N
Connie Wolfsen
FT, EKA
656
0
Description & Location of Activity
American Speech and Hearing Assoc. Conference, San
Diego, CA
FACCC Part-time Faculty Symposium, Cupertino, CA
Research and Meetings with More editor, Brooklyn Bridge
Park staff, and NY Galleries and Museums, New York ,NY
4.3
Event Date
11/17 11/19/11
10/29/11
Total Faculty Development Committee
Recommendation Round 1
1,000
462
1000
0
500
0
875
250
500
250
500
500
1,739
1739
500
0
875
500
875
500
600
500
500
600
0
500
1,424
1424
$10,225
7,888
10/1 - 10/11/11
Calif. Assoc. of Dental Assisting Teachers Methodology
Fall 2011
Certificate
Hand Tooled Furniture, Eureka, CA
7/11 - 7/15/11
Midwest Modern Language Assoc. Conference, St. Louis,
11/4 - 11/6/11
MO
Assoc. of Writers and Writing Programs Conference,
2/29 - 3/3/12
Chicago, IL
Annual Field Trip, Friends of the Pleistocene, Kern River
9/15 - 9/19/11
Region, CA
Calif. Assoc. of Dental Assisting Teachers Methodology
Fall 2011
Certificate
Think Evolution III Summer Institute, Berkeley, CA
8/1 - 8/5/11
Calif. Native Plant Society 2012 Conservation Conference,
1/10 - 1/15/12
San Diego, CA
College Art Association Conference, New York, NY
2/9 - 212/11
Winter Fancy Food Show, San Francisco, CA
1/15 - 1/17/11
American Psychiatric Nurses Assoc. Annual Conference,
10/20 Anaheim, CA
10/22/11
Total Requested Round 1, 2011-11 Academic Year
Amount
$ Amount
Senate Actually
RECOMRequested
MENDED by Decision spent
Fall 2011
FDC
7,888
Funds Allocated to date
Funds Remaining to Allocate (pending AS approval of
Round 1 Recommendations)
16,570
0
0
4.4
Draft 11/4/11
Resolution regarding Basic Skills Initiative (BSI) Governance
DRAFT
Whereas, From May 15, 2009 through December 3, 2010, there was no collaborative or
participative governance of the BSI with the Academic Senate;
Whereas, From May 15, 2009 through December 3, 2010, the administration created,
prepared and submitted the required Basic Skills Action Plan and Expenditure reports to
the state Chancellor’s Office without the required Academic Senate Co-President’s
signature;
Whereas, On December 3, 2010 the Academic Senate for College of the Redwoods
passed a Resolution calling for collegial consultation in planning and implementing the
College’s Basic Skills Initiative;
Whereas, During the Spring 2011 semester, the administration created a Basic Skills
Committee in consultation with the Academic Senate including multiple constituents and
a faculty tri-chair;
Whereas, Since April 2011 the Basic Skills Committee has demonstrated participative
governance;
Whereas, On October 7, 2011, the Basic Skills Committee created, prepared and
submitted the required Basic Skills Allocation Action Plan and Expenditure reports to the
state Chancellor’s Office with the required Academic Senate Co-President’s signature;
Resolved, That the Academic Senate for College of the Redwoods confirms the use of
collegial consultation in planning and implementing the College’s Basic Skills Initiative.
4.5
Constituency review period ends Nov 21, 2011
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Administrative Procedure
Draft AP 4024
Instructional Exigency Plan Due to Adverse Budget Environment
In the event of a significantly adverse budget environment and only after all other budget
reductions have been considered and acted upon by the Budget Planning Committee, the
President may declare that instructional cuts for budgetary reasons are necessary and will
provide written justification for the declaration (For example: unrestricted general fund equity
forecasted to fall below a 5% minimum balance for more than one fiscal year, state funding for
student enrollments forecasted to significantly decline, etc. ). Then, the Instructional Exigency
Committee will be formed to consider relevant factors and make recommendations to the
President.
The committee will consist of the following members:
 College President (ex officio and non-voting)

Vice President of Instruction (or designee. Will serve as Chair)

Academic Senate Co-Presidents

One designated faculty representative from Program Review Committee (assigned by the AS
Co-Presidents

Director of Institutional Research (or designee)

Vice President of Administrative Services

Co-Chairs of the Budget Planning Committee

Deans and Directors of Academic, CTE, and Instructional Programs
The President will call the first meeting and provide the following information at the first
meeting:
 Committee’s charge.

Full financial disclosure: The committee will be provided a written justification for
instructional cuts including other budget non programmatic or non-instructional reductions
and dollar amount required. Implications of all budget cuts, including instructional program
discontinuation, suspension, or workforce reduction, to the 50% law. The required budget cut
cannot reduce the District’s expenditure for instructional costs below the 50% criterion
(50% Law.) Any additional contingency cut, and a written justification if the amounts differ
from the recommendation of the Budget Planning Committee.

Prohibited subjects. The committee will avoid discussions or recommendations on
negotiable issues related to collective bargaining or confidential matters.
4.5
Constituency review period ends Nov 21, 2011

Avoid rumors. Until the committee publishes its recommendations, the committee will avoid
discussing its work outside of the committee, except as necessary to complete the
committee’s charge.

Deadline. A deadline, of not less than 30 days from the date of the first meeting, for the
committee to complete its work and submit its written recommendation to the President.

To prepare for and attend these committee meetings, the President may excuse committee
members from other committee work in the event of meeting conflicts.
Because sufficient time may not be available to perform in-depth research and develop reports,
the committee will primarily rely on readily available data and reports. The Committee may
consider the Executive Summaries from the Program Review Committee and a breakdown of the
cost of programs and/or disciplines from Administrative Services, as well as any relevant data
from Institutional Research on enrollment, student-faculty ratio, persistence, degree or certificate
completion, transfer data, marketplace data, or any other relevant information. The Committee
may consider the impact of the budget cuts as a whole on the college’s ongoing operations and
may adjust its recommendations to reduce disruptions to students and to position the college for
academic and financial stability, while still meeting the required budget cut amount.
Using a process to be determined by the committee, the committee will locate program(s) and/or
disciplines, prioritize them, ranking from high-low (in order of potential cuts) and listing the
expected budget impact of each program. The recommendations will be made by a simple
majority vote. Any member may abstain from voting.
After compiling the ranked order list of program/discipline recommendations, the committee will
forward the recommendations to CRFO and the Administration for negotiations (per the
Collective Bargaining Agreement).
Reference: No reference
Approved: xx/xx/xxxx
5.1
ASPC Proposal for Senate Review 11/4/11
BP 4030
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Board of Trustees Policy
ACADEMIC FREEDOM
The Board of Trustees and the Academic Senate of the Redwoods Community College
District, in an effort to promote and protect the academic freedom of faculty and students,
endorse the following policy.
It is the responsibility of the Redwoods Community College District to provide an
institutional environment that encourages academic freedom and instills respect and
commitment to the obligations required to maintain these freedoms.
Academic freedom represents the continual search for truth, and it includes protection for
the teacher to teach and for the student to learn without coercion, censorship, or other
forms of restrictive interference. Academic freedom recognizes that freedom to teach
and freedom to learn imply both rights and responsibilities within the framework of the
law. Free discussion and free access to information, therefore, are the heart of the
continuing search for truth.
Academic freedom is the freedom to discuss all relevant matters in and outside of the
classroom, to explore all avenues of scholarship, research, and creative expression. When
faculty members speak or write as citizens, thereby exercising their constitutional right of
free speech, it should be as persons who are free from institutional censorship or
discipline. With academic freedom comes academic responsibility which implies the
faithful performance of professional duties and obligations, the recognition of the
demands of the scholarly enterprise, and the candor to make it clear that when one is
speaking on matters of public interest, one is not speaking for the institution.
References: Title 5, Section 51023; Accreditation Standard II.A.7; ASCCC Resolution
Approved Fall 2010; 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure,
including the 1958 and 1970 interpretative comments of the American Association of
University Professors.
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BP 4030
Board of Trustees Policy
BP 4030
ACADEMIC FREEDOM
The Board of Trustees and the Academic Senate of the Redwoods Community College
District, in an effort to promote and protect the academic freedom of faculty and students
endorse the following policy adapted from the 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic
Freedom and Tenure (including the 1958 and 1970 interpretative comments of the
American Association of University Professors).
A.
Faculty members are entitled to freedom in the classroom in discussing issues
germane to their academic discipline. Academic freedom inherently involves the
right to introduce within the assigned teaching discipline controversial topics,
concepts, issues, and systems as long as the method or manner of presentation
involves objective reasoning and rational discussion.
B.
Faculty members are citizens, members of a profession, and employees of an
education institution. When faculty members speak or write as citizens, thereby
exercising their constitutional right of free speech, it should be as persons who are
free from institutional censorship or discipline. In the process of making such
utterances, faculty members have a responsibility to make a clear distinction
between personal viewpoints and the college's official policies.
C.
Faculty members are entitled to full freedom in research and in the publication of
the results, subject to the adequate performance of other academic duties; but
research for pecuniary return should be based upon an understanding with the
administration of the college.
D.
The protection of academic freedom and the requirements of academic
responsibility apply to full-time probationary, tenured, and part-time faculty.
Reference: Title 5 Section 51023; Accreditation Standard II.A.7
Adopted by Board of Trustees: 12/5/06
Former Policy #326, “Academic Freedom,” Adopted by the Board of Trustees: 8/15/77
Former BP 326 renumbered BP 4030
5.2.1
Constituent Review Ends 11/21/2011
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Administrative Procedure
Draft AP 4103
WORK EXPERIENCE
The college will maintain an approved plan with the State Chancellor’s Office that
includes:
•
The systematic design of a program whereby students gain realistic useful
learning experiences through workplace related activities;
•
A specific description of the respective responsibilities of the college, the student,
the employer, and other cooperating agencies;
•
Guidance services;
•
A sufficient number of qualified academic personnel to direct the program;
•
Processes that assure students’ on-the-job learning experiences are documented
with written measurable learning objectives, students are required to meet certain
criteria and are evaluated, and the basis for awarding grades and credit is
described;
•
Adequate clerical and instructional services are provided;
•
The maintenance of records that include the type and units of work experience in
which student is enrolled, where employed, job held, basis for determining
student qualifications, statement of student hours worked, evaluation of
performance, and that a work permit was issued.
Supervising faculty must maintain records that show consultation with the employer and
the student, evaluation of the student’s achievement, and the final grade.
Reference:
Title 5, Sections 55250 et seq.
Approved: XX/XX/XXXX
New Procedure
5.2.2 a
Constituent Review ends Dec 5, 2011
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Board of Trustees Policy
DRAFT BP 3050
INSTITUTIONAL CODE OF ETHICS
The Redwoods Community College District upholds an institutional code of ethics for all of its
personnel.
The President/Superintendent shall ensure that the institutional code of ethics specifying the
responsibilities of all employees and students is established. The institutional code of ethics
shall be reviewed annually and published in consultation with faculty members, classified staff
members and managers, administrators, students, and the Board of Trustees.
Reference:
Accreditation Standard III.A.1.d
ACCCA Statement of Ethics
December 14, 2010 Draft
No Former Redwoods CCD Policy
5.2.2 b
Constituent Review Ends Dec 5, 2011
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Administrative Procedure
DRAFT AP 3050
INSTITUTIONAL CODE OF ETHICS
Definition of Ethics
Ethical behavior is often described as “right” or “good” behavior as measured against
commonly accepted rules of conduct for society or for a profession. The ethical person is
often described as one who is fair, honest, straightforward, trustworthy, objective,
unprejudiced, and equitable. The consistent exercise of integrity is the cornerstone of
ethical behavior.
Importance of Ethics
A. The credibility of all employees depends upon whether they are perceived as
honest men and women. If integrity contributes to credibility, then ethical
behavior is a singular prerequisite to successful performance of one’s duties.
B. Statements of ethical standards do not necessarily ensure ethical behavior. Yet,
public statements of intent create an expression that employees will indeed act
with integrity in the public interest.
C. Although district’s guiding principles cannot address every issue or provide
answers to every dilemma, they define the spirit in which we intend to conduct
business and should guide us in our daily conduct.
Ethical Standards
All employees shall adhere to the following ethical standards:
• Exercise due diligence in the ethical performance of his or her duties and model
the highest standard of ethically responsible behavior.
• Facilitate a climate of trust, mutual support, and courteous consideration through
actions that demonstrate respect for institutional values (as defined in the mission,
vision and values statement), freedom of expression, and the right to dissent in a
constructive manner.
• Avoid knowingly making false and malicious statement about other employees or
students.
• Use caution and integrity in sharing non public information, follow state and
federal guidelines as they relate to privacy and avoid disclosing information about
selection processes, colleagues, or students obtained in the course of professional
service unless disclosure serves a valid business purpose, or is required by law.
• Avoid entering into or recommending the District enter into contractual
relationships that create conflicts of interest and lead to personal gain.
• Avoid accepting business courtesies that attempt to influence District decisions.
5.2.2 b
Constituent Review Ends Dec 5, 2011
•
•
•
•
•
Avoid permitting the interest of any members of the college community to
override the best interest of the public served by the district.
Challenge and report unethical behavior in a timely manner.
Avoid fraudulent activities. Fraud is defined as a deception deliberately practiced
in order to secure unfair or unlawful gain.
Confront issues and people without prejudice and exhibit mutual respect.
Exercise due diligence to ensure that District resources are not used for other than
their intended purpose. Employees of the District shall manage the district’s
resources prudently and shall not improperly convert such resources to personal
use or for the personal use of another.
Compliance with Laws
Commitment to ethical behavior requires complying with laws, rules, and regulations.
Each employee must have an understanding of the policies, rules, laws, and regulations
that apply to his or her specific role. If an employee is unsure of whether a contemplated
action is permitted by law or district policy, he/she should seek advice from individuals
who are knowledgeable about the matter. Employees are responsible for preventing
violations of law and for reporting violations of laws to supervisors.
Expectations of Ethical Behavior
Employees of Redwoods Community College District shall be committed to the
principles of honesty and equity. They shall not seek to abridge, for any purpose, the
freedoms of other employees or students. At the same time, they shall not willingly
permit the rights and privileges of any members of the college community to override the
best interests of the public served by the District.
Employees shall exercise judgments that are dispassionate, fair, consistent, and equitable.
They shall do everything they can to demonstrate a commitment to excellence in
education and without compromise to the principles of ethical behavior.
Similarly, students are expected to abide by ethical behavior and decision-making in their
treatment of college employees, other students, and members of the public, as noted in
the ‘Student Code of Conduct.’
Conflict of Interest
Executive administrative personnel and other designated personnel subject to the
provisions of the Political Reform Act of 1974 as set forth in Government Code Section
18000 have additional responsibilities with reference to contracts and financial decisions
made by the District as described in applicable conflict of interest laws.
5.2.2 b
Constituent Review Ends Dec 5, 2011
Violation of Institutional Code of Ethics
Although the Institutional Code of Ethics can only be a guideline, violation of its tenets
will likely may result in a violation of District policies and procedures, and/or state and
federal laws and regulations. As such In such cases, any employee who violates the
Institutional Code of Ethics may be subject to disciplinary action by the District as
described in other District policies and collective bargaining agreements.
5.2.3
Constituent Review Ends 12-05-11
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Administrative Procedure
Draft AP 5055
ENROLLMENT PRIORITIES
Enrollment in courses and programs may be limited to students meeting properly established
prerequisites and co-requisites.
Enrollment may be limited due to the following:
• health and safety considerations
• facility limitations
• faculty workload
• availability of qualified instructors
• funding limitations
• regional planning
• legal requirements
• contractual requirements
Priority Registration days and times for any semester will be assigned as follows:
1. Documented eligible students actively participating in Disabled Student Programs and
Services (DSPS) or in Extended Opportunity Programs and Services (EOPS); documented
member or former member of the Armed Forces of the United States within two years of
leaving active duty; and foster youth or former foster youth. "Foster youth" means a person
who is currently in foster care, and "former foster youth" means a person who is an
emancipated foster youth and who is up to 24 years of age.
2. In descending order, continuing students [fully matriculated assessment/orientation/advising
– please discuss] who have declared an academic program, certificate or transfer educational
goal, making satisfactory academic progress of a 2.0 cumulative grade point average or better
(effective, Fall 2013) and:
a. completed 45 or more but less than 100 units at College of the Redwoods;
b. completed between 30 and 44.5 units at College of the Redwoods;
c. completed between 15 and 29.5 units at College of the Redwoods;
d. attempting or completed between 0.5 and 14.5 units at College of the Redwoods;
3. New (includes transfer students) and returning students;
4. All other continuing students without a declared academic program, certificate or transfer or
educational goal and/or less than a 2.00 cumulative grade point average;
5. Concurrently enrolled high school students.
References: Title 5 Sections 56232, 56026, 58106, 58108; Education Code Sections 66025.8,
66025.9, 76001
Approved: 8/7/07
Amended: 1/15/08; 04/06/10
Former Policy #500, “Priority Registration,” Adopted by the Board of Trustees: 6/3/91
Amended: 6/5/95; 8/7/07
Facilities Planning Committee
Unsorted List of Local Bond Fund Requests - Oct 2011
Measure Q Project Descriptions
Location
Creative Arts Building - Add'l 5,864,816 from state bonds
Student Union - Add'l $2,376,310 from state bonds
Health & Student Svc Bldg - Add'l $5,344,929 from state bonds
Eureka sewer connection - $500K from util infrastructure
Electrical panels - state utility infrastructure
Campus safety alert upgrades
District-wide ADA and safety compliance
Security, including marquee upgrades and fire alarm
Energy conservation
HVAC, boiler equipment
Maint & Dining equipment, mini-bookstore, portable bldgs
Remodel LRC *
Carpet replacement
Athletic Complex Facility, including repurposing the pool area
Reserve for repurposing vacated buildings, incl faculty ofcs
Old library seismic upgrade *
Parking lots, fencing, etc.
Exterior paint and light upgrades
Roof replacement
Stadium scoreboard, roof, stands, walkways, field
Baseball field, stands, walkways, etc.
Softball field, stands, walkways, etc.
Track upgrade
Voice over IP (VOIP) to replace PBX & phones
Nursing facility upgrades
Wood shop waterbath - completed
Diesel Program upgrade (to coincide with revitalized program)
Automotive Technology Lab upgrade
HRC teaching kitchen *
Welding area cover expansion
Construction Technology Lab upgrade
CTE computer lab upgrades (MT, DM, DT, etc.)
Ag Dept Tompkins Hill barn renovation/ replacement
Itech Innovations Lab establishment (solar,thermal,water/waste)
Firing range upgrade
Emergency Response Training Center
Fire Technology Instruction Building
Fire Science equipment and apparatus storage
Public Safety Preparedness Tower *
TOTAL PROPOSALS
* The Facilities Planning Committee questioned how these requests
fit into the District's ongoing planning process and program review.
11/2/2011 10:57 AM
6.1 a
1
Cost
EKA
EKA
DN
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA/DN/MC
EKA/DN/MC
EKA/DN/MC
EKA/DN/MC
EKA
EKA
EKA/DN/MC
EKA
EKA
EKA
DN/MC
EKA/DN/MC
CRDN
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA/DN/MC
CRDN
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
EKA
1,319,880
2,376,310
2,869,590
1,700,000
13,000
880,000
349,700
360,000
3,664,132
105,000
50,000
140,000
3,000,000
1,500,000
800,000
177,500
255,000
600,000
1,005,000
700,000
550,000
200,000
1,000,000
29,211
850,000
500,000
450,000
150,000
500,000
450,000
250,000
300,000
150,000
15,000
350,000
40,000
1,000,000
28,649,323
-
m13-Measure Q Project Summary FPC Report.xlsx Summary
6.1 b
Facilities Planning Committee
Funding Priorities for Local Bond Funds – October 2011
1. Immediate health and safety needs and mandated requirements.
2. Relationship and relative importance to the strategic plan, facilities master plan, and
integrated planning.
3. Must be supported by institutional data and/or program review.
4. Funding history of the unit/area. Remaining useful life of the facility/item.
5. Availability of alternatives and potential for deferral. Degree to which delay will cause
larger expenditures in the future.
6. Relationship to priorities on Measure Q ballot measure.
7. Degree to which annual operating expenditures will be reduced as a result of approving
the request.
6.3.1
Constituent Review Ends Dec 5, 2011
Board Policy / Administrative Procedure Cover Sheet
Title of Policy/Procedure: Nonresident Tuition
This section to be completed by author
Author: Name and contact info
Originating Department/Division
New or Revision
BP/AP numbers
Former BP/AR numbers
Authors:
Research
• List pertinent codes researched (Ed
Code/Title 5, etc.)
• List other colleges researched
• Other references
Sr. Administrator Review (Name, date,
comments)
Keith Snow-Flamer
Student Development
Revision
AP 5020
Date submitted to PPRS
Comments:
10/17/11
Keith Snow-Flamer, Kathy Goodlive
Ed Code 76140 et seq.
North Orange, Palomar, Yuba, Cerritos
Keith Snow-Flamer
This section to be completed by Policy and Procedure Review Subcommittee (PPRS)
PPRS Contact and contact info
Format cleared (i.e. titles, font, style)
Content reviewed with CCLC format
Legal concerns
Date returned to originator
Date submitted to College Council
Comments:
Cheryl Tucker
Yes
Yes
No
10/17/11
College Council Tracking
First Review
Back to PPRS
30/90 day Review
Second Review
Date sent to Board of Trustees
Date approved by Board of Trustees
10/24/11
6.3.1
Constituent Review Ends Dec 5, 2011
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Administrative Procedure
Draft AP 5020
NONRESIDENT TUITION
Nonresident Tuition Fee for Out-of-State and Foreign Students
Not later than February 1 of each year, the President/Superintendent shall bring to the Board of
Trustees for approval an action to establish nonresident tuition for the following fiscal year. The
amount shall be derived by using the formula contained in Education Code Sections 76140 (d)
and (e). The same per-unit rate shall be charged to all nonresident students attending any
summer sessions.
Interstate Exchange Agreement
The district maintains, as allowed by Education Code 66800, several interstate exchange
agreements. Nonresident students admitted under these agreements shall pay the tuition fee and
enrollment fee appropriate to each agreement.
Tuition Fee Rate Schedule
Upon the yearly adoption of the tuition fee, the administration shall develop and publish the out
of-state tuition rates to be paid by nonresident and foreign students (regular tuition fee) and
special rates for any interstate exchange agreements maintained by the district. See
Administrative Procedure #AP 5030, “Fees.”
Tuition Fee Refunds
Refunds will be made in accordance with Administrative Procedure #AP 5030, “Fees.”
Fee Exemptions
Military Resident Exemption. Nonresident U.S. military personnel on active duty in California
(except those assigned for education purposes to state-supported institutions of higher education)
are granted a waiver of Nonresident Tuition until they are discharged from their military service.
Their dependents are granted a waiver for a period of one year from the date they enter
California. Upon expiration of the waiver, evidence must be provided as to the date the student
surrendered his/her out-of-state residence to become a resident of California. The student will be
classified as a nonresident and charged Nonresident Tuition until one year has elapsed since the
out-of-state residence was surrendered.
Foreign Students. The Board of Trustees may approve an exemption from all or part of the
nonresident fee for any nonresident who is both a citizen and resident of a foreign country, or
who are legally precluded from establishing residency in California, provided that the
nonresident student has a 2.50 cummulative GPA, enrolled as a full-time student, and has
demonstrated a financial need for the exemption, and not more than ten percent of the
nonresident foreign students attending the district may be so exempted. Students who qualify
6.3.1
Constituent Review Ends Dec 5, 2011
can file a waiver request with the Admissions Office every semester/session. If approved, the
waiver will be valid for one academic year only.
The Chief Student Services Officer shall determine annually the potential number of available
foreign students who can be considered.
The methods of determining financial need shall be done in accordance with standards utilized
for federal campus-based financial aid programs.
The Board of Trustees authorizes the President/Superintendent to contract with a state, a county
contiguous to the district boundaries, the Federal Government, a foreign country, or an agency
thereof, for payment of all or part of the nonresident student tuition fee.
The Chief Student Services Officer shall coordinate all such requests for the
district.
The criteria to be used in the determination of requests under this subsection shall include (at
minimum):
•
•
the educational benefits to the individual and the district
the reason(s) for the request, to include:
o the amount of the fee that can be paid
o demonstrated economic hardship that encompasses the financial
circumstances of a person who may qualify for a BOG waiver
o other extenuating circumstances
o two letters of recommendation (cannot be from a family member)
The Chief Student Services Officer will submit requests for nonresident tuition
fee exemptions to the Board of Trustees for approval.
References: Education Code Section 76140 et seq.
Approved: XX/XX/XXXX
Former Administrative Regulation #501.01, “Non-Resident Tuition Fee Exemptions,” Approved: 1/11/93
Former Administrative Regulation #501.02, “Non-Resident Students, Approved: 8/15/77
Revised 2/7/94, 12/7/99, 2/6/07
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Administrative Procedure
AP 5020
NONRESIDENT TUITION
Nonresident Tuition Fee for Out-of-State and Foreign Students
Not later than February 1 of each year, the President/Superintendent shall bring to the Board of
Trustees for approval an action to establish nonresident tuition for the following fiscal year. The
amount shall be derived by using the formula contained in Education Code Section 76140 (d)
and (e). The same per-unit rate shall be charged to all nonresident students attending any
6.3.1
Constituent Review Ends Dec 5, 2011
summer sessions.
Interstate Exchange Agreement
The district maintains, as allowed by Education Code 66800, several interstate exchange
agreements. Nonresident students admitted under these agreements shall pay the tuition fee and
enrollment fee appropriate to each agreement.
Tuition Fee Rate Schedule
Upon the yearly adoption of the tuition fee, the administration shall develop and publish the
outof-state tuition rates to be paid by nonresident and foreign students (regular tuition fee) and
special rates for any interstate exchange agreements maintained by the district. See
Administrative Procedure #AP 5030, Fees.
Tuition Fee Refunds
Refunds will be made in accordance with Administrative Procedure #AP 5030, Fees.
Fee Exemptions
The Board of Trustees may approve an exemption from all or part of the nonresident fee for any
nonresident who is both a citizen and resident of a foreign country, provided that the nonresident
has demonstrated a financial need for the exemption, and not more than ten percent of the
nonresident foreign students attending the district may be so exempted.
The Vice President, Student Services shall determine annually the potential number of available
foreign students who can be considered.
The methods of determining financial need shall be done in accordance with standards utilized
for federal campus-based financial aid programs.
The Board of Trustees authorizes the President/Superintendent to contract with a state, a county
contiguous to the district boundaries, the Federal Government, a foreign country, or an agency
thereof, for payment of all or part of the nonresident student tuition fee.
The Vice President, Chief Student Services Officer shall coordinate all such requests for the
district.
The criteria to be used in the determination of requests under this subsection shall include (at
minimum):
•
•
the educational benefits to the individual and the district
the reason(s) for the request, to include:
o the amount of the fee that can be paid
o a financial hardship statement
o other extenuating circumstances
The Vice President, Chief Student Services Officer will submit requests for nonresident tuition
fee exemptions to the Board of Trustees for approval.
6.3.1
Constituent Review Ends Dec 5, 2011
References: Education Code Section 76140 et seq.
Approved: 2/6/07
Former Administrative Regulation #501.01, “Non-Resident Tuition Fee Exemptions,” Approved: 1/11/93
Former Administrative Regulation #501.02, “Non-Resident Students, Approved: 8/15/77
Revised 2/7/94, 12/7/99
6.3.2 a
Constituent Review Ends 12/05/2011
Board Policy / Administrative Procedure Cover Sheet
Title of Policy/Procedure: Athletics
This section to be completed by author
Author: Name and contact info
Originating Department/Division
New or Revision
BP/AP numbers
Former BP/AR numbers
Authors:
Research
• List pertinent codes researched (Ed
Code/Title 5, etc.)
• List other colleges researched
• Other references
Sr. Administrator Review (Name, date,
comments)
Date submitted to PPRS
Comments:
Keith Snow-Flamer
Student Development
Revision
BP and AP 5700
BP 114
Keith Snow-Flamer, Joe Hash
Education Code Sections 78223, 66271.6,
66271.8, and 67360 et seq.
Title IX Education Amendments of 1972
Palomar, Yuba, Cerritos
Keith Snow-Flamer
10/14/11
This section to be completed by Policy and Procedure Review Subcommittee (PPRS)
PPRS Contact and contact info
Cheryl Tucker
Format cleared (i.e. titles, font, style)
yes
Content reviewed with CCLC format
yes
Legal concerns
no
Date returned to originator
10/17/11
Date submitted to College Council
Comments:
College Council Tracking
First Review
Back to PPRS
30/90 day Review
Second Review
Date sent to Board of Trustees
Date approved by Board of Trustees
10/24/2011
6.3.2 a
Constituent Review Ends 12/05/2011
7/19/11
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Board of Trustees Policy
Proposed BP 5700
ATHLETICS
The District shall maintain an organized program for men and women in intercollegiate athletics.
The program shall not discriminate on the basis of gender in the availability of athletic
opportunities.
The Superintendent/President shall assure that the athletics program complies with state law, the
California Community Colleges Commission on Athletics Constitution, and appropriate
Conference Constitution regarding student athlete participation.
The District shall assume financial responsibility for the Athletic Program.
See Administrative Procedure 5700.
References: Education Code Sections 78223, 66271.6, 66271.8, and 67360 et seq.
Revision adopted XX/XX/XXXX
Former Board Policy No. 114 “Intercollegiate Activities”
Adopted 8/15/77
COLLEGE OF THE REDWOODS
Board of Trustees Policy No. 114
Administrative Regulation No. ___
INTERCOLLEGIATE ACTIVITIES
The Board recognizes the value of a program of intercollegiate activities as an integral part of the
total school experience to the students of the College and to the community.
Through a program of intercollegiate activities, the Board offers students the opportunity to
exercise and test their abilities in a context greater and more varied than that which can be
offered by the College alone.
The President shall approve periodically a program of inter- collegiate activities and shall require
that all facilities utilized in that program, whether or not the property of the College, properly
safeguard both participants and spectators and are kept free from hazardous conditions.
It shall be the policy of the Board to offer opportunities for participation in intercollegiate
6.3.2 a
Constituent Review Ends 12/05/2011
activities programs to male and female students on as equal a basis as is practicable and in
accordance with State and Federal guidelines.
Adopted by Board of Trustees: August 15, 1977
6.3.2 b
Constituent Review Ends 12/05/2011
REDWOODS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
Administrative Procedure
ATHLETICS
Athletic Drug Testing
Athletic drug testing is not mandated.
Office of Primary Responsibility: Athletics
References: Education Code Sections 66271.6, 66271.8, and 67360 et seq.;
Title IX Education Amendments of 1972
No former Administrative Procedures.
Adopted XX/XX/XXXX
Proposed AP 5700